www.studymafia.org
Submitted To: Submitted By:
www.studymafia.org www.studymafia.org
Seminar
On
MULTIPLE INPUT
MULTIPLE OUTPUT
SYSTEMS (MIMO)
 Introduction
 What is MIMO?
 Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing
 MEMO capacity on fading channels
 Benefits of MIMO
 Drawbacks of MIMO
 Conclusion
Content
MIMO Systems:
 use multiple inputs and multiple outputs from a
single channel
 are defined by Spatial Diversity and Spatial
Multiplexing
Introduction
As we know MIMO is multiple antenna
technology in which more than one antennas
are used at transmitter and receiver stations.
What is MIMO?
 Spatial Diversity
◦ Signal copies are transferred from multiple
antennas or received at more than one antenna
◦ redundancy is provided by employing an array of
antennas, with a minimum separation of λ/2
between neighbouring antennas
 Spatial Multiplexing
◦ the system is able to carry more than one data
stream over one frequency, simultaneously
Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing
 There is always a need for increase in performance in
wireless systems
◦ Significant increase in spectral efficiency and data
rates
◦ High Quality of Service (QoS)
◦ Wide coverage, etc.
 Wireless channel that we are using is very unfriendly
◦ Suffers from Co–channel interference and signal
level fading
◦ It provides a limited bandwidth
◦ power falls off with distance
Why MIMO?
 By using Multiple Output Multiple Input (MIMO)
systems
◦ Diversity gain mitigates the fading and increases
coverage and improves QoS
◦ Multiplexing gain increases capacity and spectral
efficiency with no additional power or bandwidth
expenditure
◦ Array gain results in an increase in average receive
SNR.
 Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing can be
conflicting goals
MIMO System solutions
 MIMO channels can be decomposed into a number of R parallel
independent channels Multiplexing Gain
→
◦ Principle: Transmit independent data signals from different antennas
to increase the throughput, capacity.
Spatial Multiplexing
Source: An Overview of MIMO Systems in Wireless Communications
www.iet.ntnu.no/projects/beats/Documents/mimo.pdf
MEMO capacity on fading channels
 The capacity increase can be seen by comparing MEMO
systems with SISO, SIMO, and MISO systems
◦ SISO:capacity is given by Shannon’s classical formula:
Where B is the BW and h is the fading gain
◦ SIMO (with M transmitting antennas), the capacity is given by
[2]
◦ MISO (with M transmitting antennas), the capacity is given by
[2]
)
2
1
(
2
log h
snr
B
C 


)
1
2
1
(
2
log 




m
n
n
h
snr
B
C
)
1
2
1
(
2
log 










N
n
n
h
N
snr
B
C
MEMO capacity on fading channels
 The capacity for MIMO systems can have the following forms
(Assuming Tx antennas = Rx antennas = N):
A) If the channel is not known at the transmitter:
◦ Where Es is the total power, σ2
is noise level of AWGN
◦ Hence the power is equally shared by each channel
◦ The capacity grows linearly with the number of antennas
B) If the channel is known at the transmitter
)
2
2
1
(
2
log
n
h
N
s
E
N
C 












 


















N
n n
h
n
E
C
1
)
2
2
1
(
2
log

 With the channel known at the transmitter, the total power
allocation the each channel will be based on watterfilling.
◦ Watterfilling: Strong Sub-channel, with low noise power level will be
assigned with a higher signal power.
Where σ 2
= σ2
/ h
│ 2
│
MEMO capacity on fading channels
Illustrating Watterfilling
Source: MIMO Systems and Transmit Diversity,
www.comm.utoronto.ca/~rsadve/Notes/DiversityTransmit.pdf
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
SNR [dB]
Average
Capacity
[bits/sec/Hz]
N=1 M=1 N=2 M=1 N=1 M=2 N=2 M=2 N=2 M=4 N=2 M=6 N=4 M=4 N=8 M=8
Average capacity of a MIMO Rayleigh
fading channel []
Source: Space-time Diversity Codes for Fading Channels, [3]
 Improves the signal quality and achieves a higher SNR at the
receiver-side
 Principle of diversity relies on the transmission of structured
redundancy
Spatial Diversity
xi
yi
MIMO Diversity and Reliability
 The performance improvement in SNR and error probability
for MIMO can be compared with SISO, SIMO, and MISO
 The detailed calculation for SNR and Pe is shown in [1]
◦ SISO:
◦ Receive Diversity (SIMO):
N
i
n
x
h
y i
i
i 
,
2
,
1
, 




N
i
h
SNR
h
SNR
2
)
(
2
1
1
SNR
Pe


n
hx
y 

2
2
2
)
( h
SNR
n
E
hx
E
h
SNR 
 and
N
SNR
Pe








2
1
1
and
MIMO Diversity and Reliability
 The values for SNR and Pe for:
◦ Transmit Diversity (MISO):
◦ Transmit/Receive Diversity (MIMO):
 The received signal at antenna i will be:
 H is the channel fading matrix
i
j
ij
M
j
i n
x
h
y 


1
2
2
)
(
}
,
min{
H
SNR
H
SNR
M
N
H
SNR


M
SNR
Pe








2
1
1
n
x
h
y j
M
j
j 


1



M
j
j
h
SNR
h
SNR
1
2
)
( and
MN
M
N
SNR
Pe










}
,
min{
2
1
1
and
➨There is lower susceptibility of tapping by
unauthorized persons due to multiple antennas and
algorithms.
The systems with MIMO offers high QoS (Quality of
➨
Service) with increased spectral efficiency and data
rates.
The wide coverage supported by MIMO system
➨
helps in supporting large number of subscribers per
cell.
The MIMO based system is widely
➨
Benefits of MIMO
➨The hardware resources increase power
requirements. Battery gets drain faster due to
processing of complex and computationally intensive
signal processing algorithms. This reduces battery
lifetime of MIMO based devices.
MIMO based systems cost higher compare to single
➨
antenna based system due to increased hardware
and advanced software requirements.
Drawbacks of MIMO
 The capacity of Receive or Transmit Diversity grows
logarithmically with the number of antennas
 Capacity of MEMO increases linearly with the number of
antennas
 Using Spatial Diversity:
◦ The SNR increases and Pe decreases when using MIMO
 Spatial Multiplexing and Spatial Diversity are conflicting
objectives
Conclusion
Reference
 www.google.com
 www.wikipedia.com
 www.studymafia.org
THANKS

Seminar on multiple input multiple output system

  • 1.
    www.studymafia.org Submitted To: SubmittedBy: www.studymafia.org www.studymafia.org Seminar On MULTIPLE INPUT MULTIPLE OUTPUT SYSTEMS (MIMO)
  • 2.
     Introduction  Whatis MIMO?  Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing  MEMO capacity on fading channels  Benefits of MIMO  Drawbacks of MIMO  Conclusion Content
  • 3.
    MIMO Systems:  usemultiple inputs and multiple outputs from a single channel  are defined by Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing Introduction
  • 4.
    As we knowMIMO is multiple antenna technology in which more than one antennas are used at transmitter and receiver stations. What is MIMO?
  • 5.
     Spatial Diversity ◦Signal copies are transferred from multiple antennas or received at more than one antenna ◦ redundancy is provided by employing an array of antennas, with a minimum separation of λ/2 between neighbouring antennas  Spatial Multiplexing ◦ the system is able to carry more than one data stream over one frequency, simultaneously Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing
  • 6.
     There isalways a need for increase in performance in wireless systems ◦ Significant increase in spectral efficiency and data rates ◦ High Quality of Service (QoS) ◦ Wide coverage, etc.  Wireless channel that we are using is very unfriendly ◦ Suffers from Co–channel interference and signal level fading ◦ It provides a limited bandwidth ◦ power falls off with distance Why MIMO?
  • 7.
     By usingMultiple Output Multiple Input (MIMO) systems ◦ Diversity gain mitigates the fading and increases coverage and improves QoS ◦ Multiplexing gain increases capacity and spectral efficiency with no additional power or bandwidth expenditure ◦ Array gain results in an increase in average receive SNR.  Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing can be conflicting goals MIMO System solutions
  • 8.
     MIMO channelscan be decomposed into a number of R parallel independent channels Multiplexing Gain → ◦ Principle: Transmit independent data signals from different antennas to increase the throughput, capacity. Spatial Multiplexing Source: An Overview of MIMO Systems in Wireless Communications www.iet.ntnu.no/projects/beats/Documents/mimo.pdf
  • 9.
    MEMO capacity onfading channels  The capacity increase can be seen by comparing MEMO systems with SISO, SIMO, and MISO systems ◦ SISO:capacity is given by Shannon’s classical formula: Where B is the BW and h is the fading gain ◦ SIMO (with M transmitting antennas), the capacity is given by [2] ◦ MISO (with M transmitting antennas), the capacity is given by [2] ) 2 1 ( 2 log h snr B C    ) 1 2 1 ( 2 log      m n n h snr B C ) 1 2 1 ( 2 log            N n n h N snr B C
  • 10.
    MEMO capacity onfading channels  The capacity for MIMO systems can have the following forms (Assuming Tx antennas = Rx antennas = N): A) If the channel is not known at the transmitter: ◦ Where Es is the total power, σ2 is noise level of AWGN ◦ Hence the power is equally shared by each channel ◦ The capacity grows linearly with the number of antennas B) If the channel is known at the transmitter ) 2 2 1 ( 2 log n h N s E N C                                  N n n h n E C 1 ) 2 2 1 ( 2 log 
  • 11.
     With thechannel known at the transmitter, the total power allocation the each channel will be based on watterfilling. ◦ Watterfilling: Strong Sub-channel, with low noise power level will be assigned with a higher signal power. Where σ 2 = σ2 / h │ 2 │ MEMO capacity on fading channels Illustrating Watterfilling Source: MIMO Systems and Transmit Diversity, www.comm.utoronto.ca/~rsadve/Notes/DiversityTransmit.pdf
  • 12.
    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 0 1 23 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 SNR [dB] Average Capacity [bits/sec/Hz] N=1 M=1 N=2 M=1 N=1 M=2 N=2 M=2 N=2 M=4 N=2 M=6 N=4 M=4 N=8 M=8 Average capacity of a MIMO Rayleigh fading channel [] Source: Space-time Diversity Codes for Fading Channels, [3]
  • 13.
     Improves thesignal quality and achieves a higher SNR at the receiver-side  Principle of diversity relies on the transmission of structured redundancy Spatial Diversity xi yi
  • 14.
    MIMO Diversity andReliability  The performance improvement in SNR and error probability for MIMO can be compared with SISO, SIMO, and MISO  The detailed calculation for SNR and Pe is shown in [1] ◦ SISO: ◦ Receive Diversity (SIMO): N i n x h y i i i  , 2 , 1 ,      N i h SNR h SNR 2 ) ( 2 1 1 SNR Pe   n hx y   2 2 2 ) ( h SNR n E hx E h SNR   and N SNR Pe         2 1 1 and
  • 15.
    MIMO Diversity andReliability  The values for SNR and Pe for: ◦ Transmit Diversity (MISO): ◦ Transmit/Receive Diversity (MIMO):  The received signal at antenna i will be:  H is the channel fading matrix i j ij M j i n x h y    1 2 2 ) ( } , min{ H SNR H SNR M N H SNR   M SNR Pe         2 1 1 n x h y j M j j    1    M j j h SNR h SNR 1 2 ) ( and MN M N SNR Pe           } , min{ 2 1 1 and
  • 16.
    ➨There is lowersusceptibility of tapping by unauthorized persons due to multiple antennas and algorithms. The systems with MIMO offers high QoS (Quality of ➨ Service) with increased spectral efficiency and data rates. The wide coverage supported by MIMO system ➨ helps in supporting large number of subscribers per cell. The MIMO based system is widely ➨ Benefits of MIMO
  • 17.
    ➨The hardware resourcesincrease power requirements. Battery gets drain faster due to processing of complex and computationally intensive signal processing algorithms. This reduces battery lifetime of MIMO based devices. MIMO based systems cost higher compare to single ➨ antenna based system due to increased hardware and advanced software requirements. Drawbacks of MIMO
  • 18.
     The capacityof Receive or Transmit Diversity grows logarithmically with the number of antennas  Capacity of MEMO increases linearly with the number of antennas  Using Spatial Diversity: ◦ The SNR increases and Pe decreases when using MIMO  Spatial Multiplexing and Spatial Diversity are conflicting objectives Conclusion
  • 19.
  • 20.