Semantic annotation, which is considered one of the semantic web applicative aspects, has been adopted by researchers from different communities as a paramount solution that improves searching and retrieval of information by promoting the richness of the content. However, researchers are facing challenges concerning both the quality and the relevance of the semantic annotations attached to the annotated document against its content as well as its semantics, without ignoring those regarding automation process which is supposed to ensure an optimal system for information indexing and retrieval. In this article, we will introduce the semantic annotation concept by presenting a state of the art including definitions, features and a classification of annotation systems. Systems and proposed approaches in the field will be cited, as well as a study of some existing annotation tools. This study will also pinpoint various problems and limitations related to the annotation in order to offer solutions for our future work.
Survey of Machine Learning Techniques in Textual Document ClassificationIOSR Journals
Classification of Text Document points towards associating one or more predefined categories based
on the likelihood expressed by the training set of labeled documents. Many machine learning algorithms plays
an important role in training the system with predefined categories. The importance of Machine learning
approach has felt because of which the study has been taken up for text document classification based on the
statistical event models available. The aim of this paper is to present the important techniques and
methodologies that are employed for text documents classification, at the same time making awareness of some
of the interesting challenges that remain to be solved, focused mainly on text representation and machine
learning techniques.
Sentiment Analysis of Document Based on Annotation dannyijwest
I present a tool which tells the quality of document or its usefulness based on annotations. Annotation may
include comments, notes, observation, highlights, underline, explanation, question or help etc. comments
are used for evaluative purpose while others are used for summarization or for expansion also. Further
these comments may be on another annotation. Such annotations are referred as meta-annotation. All
annotation may not get equal weightage. My tool considered highlights, underline as well as comments to
infer the collective sentiment of annotators. Collective sentiments of annotators are classified as positive,
negative, objectivity. My tool computes collective sentiment of annotations in two manners. It counts all the
annotation present on the documents as well as it also computes sentiment scores of all annotation which
includes comments to obtain the collective sentiments about the document or to judge the quality of
document. I demonstrate the use of tool on research paper
Survey of Machine Learning Techniques in Textual Document ClassificationIOSR Journals
Classification of Text Document points towards associating one or more predefined categories based
on the likelihood expressed by the training set of labeled documents. Many machine learning algorithms plays
an important role in training the system with predefined categories. The importance of Machine learning
approach has felt because of which the study has been taken up for text document classification based on the
statistical event models available. The aim of this paper is to present the important techniques and
methodologies that are employed for text documents classification, at the same time making awareness of some
of the interesting challenges that remain to be solved, focused mainly on text representation and machine
learning techniques.
Sentiment Analysis of Document Based on Annotation dannyijwest
I present a tool which tells the quality of document or its usefulness based on annotations. Annotation may
include comments, notes, observation, highlights, underline, explanation, question or help etc. comments
are used for evaluative purpose while others are used for summarization or for expansion also. Further
these comments may be on another annotation. Such annotations are referred as meta-annotation. All
annotation may not get equal weightage. My tool considered highlights, underline as well as comments to
infer the collective sentiment of annotators. Collective sentiments of annotators are classified as positive,
negative, objectivity. My tool computes collective sentiment of annotations in two manners. It counts all the
annotation present on the documents as well as it also computes sentiment scores of all annotation which
includes comments to obtain the collective sentiments about the document or to judge the quality of
document. I demonstrate the use of tool on research paper
Semantic Annotation: The Mainstay of Semantic WebEditor IJCATR
Given that semantic Web realization is based on the critical mass of metadata accessibility and the representation of data with formal
knowledge, it needs to generate metadata that is specific, easy to understand and well-defined. However, semantic annotation of the
web documents is the successful way to make the Semantic Web vision a reality. This paper introduces the Semantic Web and its
vision (stack layers) with regard to some concept definitions that helps the understanding of semantic annotation. Additionally, this
paper introduces the semantic annotation categories, tools, domains and models
This paper is addressed towards extraction of important words from conversations, with the
objective of utilizing these watchwords to recover, for every short audio fragment, a little number of
conceivably relatable reports, which can be prescribed to members, just-in-time. In any case, even a short
audio fragment contains a mixed bag of words, which are conceivably identified with a few topics; also,
utilizing automatic speech recognition (ASR) framework slips errors in the output. Along these lines, it is
hard to surmise correctly the data needs of the discussion members. We first propose a calculation to
remove decisive words from the yield of an ASR framework (or a manual transcript for testing) to
coordinate the potentially differing qualities of subjects and decrease ASR commotion. At that point, we
make use of a technique that to make many implicit queries from the selected keywords which will in
return produce list of relevant documents. The scores demonstrate that our proposition moves forward over
past systems that consider just word recurrence or theme closeness, and speaks to a promising answer for a
report recommender framework to be utilized as a part of discussions.
In this paper, we present three techniques for incorporating syntactic metadata in a textual retrieval system. The first technique involves just a syntactic analysis of the query and it generates a different weight for each term of the query, depending on its grammar category in the query phrase. These weights will be used for each term in the retrieval process. The second technique involves a storage optimization of the system's inverted index that is the inverse index will store only terms that are subjects or predicates in the document they appear in. Finally, the third technique builds a full syntactic index, meaning that for each term in the term collection, the inverse index stores besides the term-frequency and the inverse-document-frequency, also the grammar category of the term for each of its occurrences in a document.
Lexicon Based Emotion Analysis on Twitter Dataijtsrd
This paper presents a system that extracts information from automatically annotated tweets using well known existing opinion lexicons and supervised machine learning approach. In this paper, the sentiment features are primarily extracted from novel high coverage tweet specific sentiment lexicons. These lexicons are automatically generated from tweets with sentiment word hashtags and from tweets with emoticons. The sentence level or tweet level classification is done based on these word level sentiment features by using Sequential Minimal Optimization SMO classifier. SemEval 2013 Twitter sentiment dataset is applied in this work. The ablation experiments show that this system gains in F Score of up to 6.8 absolute percentage points. Nang Noon Kham "Lexicon Based Emotion Analysis on Twitter Data" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-5 , August 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd26566.pdfPaper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/data-miining/26566/lexicon-based-emotion-analysis-on-twitter-data/nang-noon-kham
This paper is focused towards extraction of important words from conversations, and then these
words are utilized to recover a small number of relevant documents, which can be given to users as per
their needs. In any case, even a short audio fragment contains of large number of words, which are
conceivably identified with a few topics and also, using automatic speech recognition (ASR) framework
reduces errors in the output. It is difficult to provide the data needs of the conversation members
appropriately. A calculation to remove decisive words from the yield of an ASR framework (or a manual
transcript for testing) to support the potentially differing qualities of subjects and decrease ASR
commotion is proposed. At that point, a technique is used to make many implicit queries from the selected
keywords. These queries will in return produce list of relevant documents. The scores demonstrate that our
proposition is modified over past systems that consider just word re-occurrence or topic closeness, and
speaks to an appropriate answer for a report recommender framework to be utilized as a part of
discussions.
Context Driven Technique for Document ClassificationIDES Editor
In this paper we present an innovative hybrid Text
Classification (TC) system that bridges the gap between
statistical and context based techniques. Our algorithm
harnesses contextual information at two stages. First it extracts
a cohesive set of keywords for each category by using lexical
references, implicit context as derived from LSA and wordvicinity
driven semantics. And secondly, each document is
represented by a set of context rich features whose values are
derived by considering both lexical cohesion as well as the extent
of coverage of salient concepts via lexical chaining. After
keywords are extracted, a subset of the input documents is
apportioned as training set. Its members are assigned categories
based on their keyword representation. These labeled
documents are used to train binary SVM classifiers, one for
each category. The remaining documents are supplied to the
trained classifiers in the form of their context-enhanced feature
vectors. Each document is finally ascribed its appropriate
category by an SVM classifier.
This paper proposes Natural language based Discourse Analysis method used for extracting
information from the news article of different domain. The Discourse analysis used the Rhetorical Structure
theory which is used to find coherent group of text which are most prominent for extracting information
from text. RST theory used the Nucleus- Satellite concept for finding most prominent text from the text
document. After Discourse analysis the text analysis has been done for extracting domain related object
and relates this object. For extracting the information knowledge based system has been used which
consist of domain dictionary .The domain dictionary has a bag of words for domain. The system is
evaluated according gold-of-art analysis and human decision for extracted information.
TOWARDS A STANDARD OF MODELLING ANNOTATIONS IN THE E-HEALTH DOMAINhiij
A large number of annotation systems in e-health domain have been implemented in the literature. Several factors distinguish these systems from one another. In fact, each of these systems is based on a separate paradigm, resulting in a disorganized and unstructured vision. As part of our research, we attempted to categorize them based on the functionalities provided by each system, and we also proposed a model of annotations that integrates both the health professional and the patient in the process of annotating the medical file.
Semantic Annotation: The Mainstay of Semantic WebEditor IJCATR
Given that semantic Web realization is based on the critical mass of metadata accessibility and the representation of data with formal
knowledge, it needs to generate metadata that is specific, easy to understand and well-defined. However, semantic annotation of the
web documents is the successful way to make the Semantic Web vision a reality. This paper introduces the Semantic Web and its
vision (stack layers) with regard to some concept definitions that helps the understanding of semantic annotation. Additionally, this
paper introduces the semantic annotation categories, tools, domains and models
This paper is addressed towards extraction of important words from conversations, with the
objective of utilizing these watchwords to recover, for every short audio fragment, a little number of
conceivably relatable reports, which can be prescribed to members, just-in-time. In any case, even a short
audio fragment contains a mixed bag of words, which are conceivably identified with a few topics; also,
utilizing automatic speech recognition (ASR) framework slips errors in the output. Along these lines, it is
hard to surmise correctly the data needs of the discussion members. We first propose a calculation to
remove decisive words from the yield of an ASR framework (or a manual transcript for testing) to
coordinate the potentially differing qualities of subjects and decrease ASR commotion. At that point, we
make use of a technique that to make many implicit queries from the selected keywords which will in
return produce list of relevant documents. The scores demonstrate that our proposition moves forward over
past systems that consider just word recurrence or theme closeness, and speaks to a promising answer for a
report recommender framework to be utilized as a part of discussions.
In this paper, we present three techniques for incorporating syntactic metadata in a textual retrieval system. The first technique involves just a syntactic analysis of the query and it generates a different weight for each term of the query, depending on its grammar category in the query phrase. These weights will be used for each term in the retrieval process. The second technique involves a storage optimization of the system's inverted index that is the inverse index will store only terms that are subjects or predicates in the document they appear in. Finally, the third technique builds a full syntactic index, meaning that for each term in the term collection, the inverse index stores besides the term-frequency and the inverse-document-frequency, also the grammar category of the term for each of its occurrences in a document.
Lexicon Based Emotion Analysis on Twitter Dataijtsrd
This paper presents a system that extracts information from automatically annotated tweets using well known existing opinion lexicons and supervised machine learning approach. In this paper, the sentiment features are primarily extracted from novel high coverage tweet specific sentiment lexicons. These lexicons are automatically generated from tweets with sentiment word hashtags and from tweets with emoticons. The sentence level or tweet level classification is done based on these word level sentiment features by using Sequential Minimal Optimization SMO classifier. SemEval 2013 Twitter sentiment dataset is applied in this work. The ablation experiments show that this system gains in F Score of up to 6.8 absolute percentage points. Nang Noon Kham "Lexicon Based Emotion Analysis on Twitter Data" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-3 | Issue-5 , August 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd26566.pdfPaper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/data-miining/26566/lexicon-based-emotion-analysis-on-twitter-data/nang-noon-kham
This paper is focused towards extraction of important words from conversations, and then these
words are utilized to recover a small number of relevant documents, which can be given to users as per
their needs. In any case, even a short audio fragment contains of large number of words, which are
conceivably identified with a few topics and also, using automatic speech recognition (ASR) framework
reduces errors in the output. It is difficult to provide the data needs of the conversation members
appropriately. A calculation to remove decisive words from the yield of an ASR framework (or a manual
transcript for testing) to support the potentially differing qualities of subjects and decrease ASR
commotion is proposed. At that point, a technique is used to make many implicit queries from the selected
keywords. These queries will in return produce list of relevant documents. The scores demonstrate that our
proposition is modified over past systems that consider just word re-occurrence or topic closeness, and
speaks to an appropriate answer for a report recommender framework to be utilized as a part of
discussions.
Context Driven Technique for Document ClassificationIDES Editor
In this paper we present an innovative hybrid Text
Classification (TC) system that bridges the gap between
statistical and context based techniques. Our algorithm
harnesses contextual information at two stages. First it extracts
a cohesive set of keywords for each category by using lexical
references, implicit context as derived from LSA and wordvicinity
driven semantics. And secondly, each document is
represented by a set of context rich features whose values are
derived by considering both lexical cohesion as well as the extent
of coverage of salient concepts via lexical chaining. After
keywords are extracted, a subset of the input documents is
apportioned as training set. Its members are assigned categories
based on their keyword representation. These labeled
documents are used to train binary SVM classifiers, one for
each category. The remaining documents are supplied to the
trained classifiers in the form of their context-enhanced feature
vectors. Each document is finally ascribed its appropriate
category by an SVM classifier.
This paper proposes Natural language based Discourse Analysis method used for extracting
information from the news article of different domain. The Discourse analysis used the Rhetorical Structure
theory which is used to find coherent group of text which are most prominent for extracting information
from text. RST theory used the Nucleus- Satellite concept for finding most prominent text from the text
document. After Discourse analysis the text analysis has been done for extracting domain related object
and relates this object. For extracting the information knowledge based system has been used which
consist of domain dictionary .The domain dictionary has a bag of words for domain. The system is
evaluated according gold-of-art analysis and human decision for extracted information.
TOWARDS A STANDARD OF MODELLING ANNOTATIONS IN THE E-HEALTH DOMAINhiij
A large number of annotation systems in e-health domain have been implemented in the literature. Several factors distinguish these systems from one another. In fact, each of these systems is based on a separate paradigm, resulting in a disorganized and unstructured vision. As part of our research, we attempted to categorize them based on the functionalities provided by each system, and we also proposed a model of annotations that integrates both the health professional and the patient in the process of annotating the medical file.
Abstract:
A growing number of resources are available for enriching documents with semantic annotations. While originally focused on a few standard classes of annotations, the ecosystem of annotators is now becoming increasingly diverse. Although annotators often have very different vocabularies, with both high-level and specialist
concepts, they also have many semantic interconnections. We will show that both the overlap and the diversity in annotator vocabularies motivate the need for semantic annotation integration: middleware that produces a unified annotation on top of diverse semantic annotators. On the one hand, the diversity of vocabulary allows applications
to benefit from the much richer vocabulary available in
an integrated vocabulary. On the other hand, we present evidence that the most widely-used annotators on the web suffer from serious accuracy deficiencies: the overlap in vocabularies from individual annotators allows an integrated annotator to boost accuracy by exploiting inter-annotator agreement and disagreement.
The integration of semantic annotations leads to new challenges, both compared to usual data integration scenarios and to standard aggregation of machine learning tools. We overview an approach to these challenges that performs ontology-aware aggregation. We
introduce an approach that requires no training data, making use of ideas from database repair. We experimentally compare this with a supervised approach, which adapts maximal entropy Markov models to the setting of ontology-based annotations. We further experimentally compare both these approaches with respect to ontology-unaware
supervised approaches, and to individual annotators.
Health Informatics: An International Journal (HIIJ)
ISSN : 2319 - 2046 (Online); 2319 - 3190 (Print)
https://airccse.org/journal/hiij/index.html
Volume 10, Number 4
Towards a Standard of Modelling Annotations in the E-Health Domain
For more info
https://airccse.org/journal/hiij/Current2021.html
Great model a model for the automatic generation of semantic relations betwee...ijcsity
The
large
a
v
ailable
am
ou
n
t
of
non
-
structured
texts
that
b
e
-
long
to
differe
n
t
domains
su
c
h
as
healthcare
(e.g.
medical
records),
justice
(e.g.
l
a
ws,
declarations),
insurance
(e.g.
declarations),
etc. increases
the
effort
required
for
the
analysis
of
information
in
a
decision making
pro
-
cess.
Differe
n
t
pr
o
jects
and t
o
ols
h
av
e
pro
p
osed
strategies
to
reduce
this
complexi
t
y
b
y
classifying,
summarizing
or
annotating
the
texts.
P
artic
-
ularl
y
,
text
summary
strategies
h
av
e
pr
ov
en
to
b
e
v
ery
useful
to
pr
o
vide
a
compact
view
of
an
original
text.
H
ow
e
v
er,
the
a
v
ailable
strategies
to
generate
these
summaries
do
not
fit
v
ery
w
ell
within
the
domains
that
require
ta
k
e
i
n
to
consideration
the
tem
p
oral
dimension
of
the
text
(e.g.
a
rece
n
t
piece
of
text
in
a
medical
record
is
more
im
p
orta
n
t
than
a
pre
-
vious
one)
and
the
profile
of
the
p
erson
who
requires
the
summary
(e.g
the
medical
s
p
ecialization).
T
o
co
p
e with
these
limitations
this
pa
p
er
prese
n
ts
”GRe
A
T”
a
m
o
del
for
automatic
summary
generation
that
re
-
lies
on
natural
language
pr
o
cessing
and
text
mining
te
c
hniques
to
extract
the
most
rele
v
a
n
t
information
from
narrati
v
e
texts
and
disc
o
v
er
new
in
-
formation
from
the
detection
of
related
information. GRe
A
T
M
o
del
w
as impleme
n
ted
on
sof
tw
are
to
b
e
v
alidated
in
a
health
institution
where
it
has
sh
o
wn
to
b
e
v
ery
useful
to displ
a
y
a
preview
of
the
information
a
b
ou
t
medical
health
records
and
disc
o
v
er
new
facts
and
h
y
p
otheses
within
the
information.
Se
v
eral
tests
w
ere
executed
su
c
h
as
F
unctional
-
i
t
y
,
Usabili
t
y
and
P
erformance
regarding
to
the
impleme
n
ted
sof
t
w
are.
In
addition,
precision
and
recall
measures
w
ere
applied
on
the
results
ob
-
tained
through
the
impleme
n
ted
t
o
ol,
as
w
ell
as
on
the
loss
of
information
obtained
b
y
pr
o
viding
a
text
more
shorter than
the
original
Towards a Standard of Modelling Annotations in the E-Health Domainhiij
A large number of annotation systems in e-health domain have been implemented in the literature. Several factors distinguish these systems from one another. In fact, each of these systems is based on a separate paradigm, resulting in a disorganized and unstructured vision. As part of our research, we attempted to categorize them based on the functionalities provided by each system, and we also proposed a model of annotations that integrates both the health professional and the patient in the process of annotating the medical file.
Many of previous research have proven that the usage of rhetorical relations is capable to enhance many applications such as text summarization, question answering and natural language generation. This work proposes an approach that expands the benefit of rhetorical relations to address redundancy problem for cluster-based text summarization of multiple documents. We exploited rhetorical relations exist between sentences to group similar sentences into multiple clusters to identify themes of common information. The candidate summary were extracted from these clusters. Then, cluster-based text summarization is performed using Conditional Markov Random Walk Model to measure the saliency scores of the candidate summary. We evaluated our method by measuring the cohesion and separation of the clusters constructed by exploiting rhetorical relations and ROUGE score of generated summaries. The experimental result shows that our method performed well which shows promising potential of applying rhetorical relation in text clustering which benefits text summarization of multiple documents.
EXPLOITING RHETORICAL RELATIONS TO MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS TEXT SUMMARIZATIONIJNSA Journal
Many of previous research have proven that the usage of rhetorical relations is capable to enhance many applications such as text summarization, question answering and natural language generation. This work proposes an approach that expands the benefit of rhetorical relations to address redundancy problem for cluster-based text summarization of multiple documents. We exploited rhetorical relations exist between sentences to group similar sentences into multiple clusters to identify themes of common information. The candidate summary were extracted from these clusters. Then, cluster-based text summarization is performed using Conditional Markov Random Walk Model to measure the saliency scores of the candidate summary. We evaluated our method by measuring the cohesion and separation of the clusters constructed by exploiting rhetorical relations and ROUGE score of generated summaries. The experimental result shows that our method performed well which shows promising potential of applying rhetorical relation in text clustering which benefits text summarization of multiple documents.
09 9241 it co-citation network investigation (edit ari)IAESIJEECS
This paper reports a co-citation network investigation (bibliometric investigation) of 10 journals in the management of technology (MOT) field. And also presenting different bibliometric thoughts, organize investigation devices recognize and investigate the ideas secured by the field and their between connections. Particular outcomes from various levels of investigation demonstrate the diverse measurements of technology administration: Co-word terms recognize subjects, Journal co-reference arrange: connecting to different controls, Co-citation network indicate groupings of topics. The examination demonstrates that MOT has a connecting part in coordinating thoughts from a few particular orders. This recommends administration and technique are vital to MOT which basically identifies with the firm as opposed to arrangement. Additionally we have a double concentrate on abilities, however can see inconspicuous contrasts by the way we see these thoughts, either through an inwards looking focal point to perceive how associations capacity, or all the more outward to comprehend setting and change in landscapes.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA) is an open access online peer reviewed international journal that publishes research and review articles in the fields of Computer Science, Neural Networks, Electrical Engineering, Software Engineering, Information Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Plastic Engineering, Food Technology, Textile Engineering, Nano Technology & science, Power Electronics, Electronics & Communication Engineering, Computational mathematics, Image processing, Civil Engineering, Structural Engineering, Environmental Engineering, VLSI Testing & Low Power VLSI Design etc.
"Analysis of Different Text Classification Algorithms: An Assessment "ijtsrd
Theoretical Classification of information has become a significant research region. The way toward ordering archives into predefined classifications dependent on their substance is Text characterization. It is the mechanized task of common language writings to predefined classifications. The essential prerequisite of content recovery frameworks is content characterization, which recover messages because of a client inquiry, and content getting frameworks, which change message here and there, for example, responding to questions, creating outlines or removing information. In this paper we are concentrating the different grouping calculations. Order is the way toward isolating the information to certain gatherings that can demonstration either conditionally or freely. Our fundamental point is to show the examination of the different characterization calculations like K nn, Na¯ve Bayes, Decision Tree, Random Forest and Support Vector Machine SVM with quick digger and discover which calculation will be generally reasonable for the clients. Adarsh Raushan | Prof. Ankur Taneja | Prof. Naveen Jain "Analysis of Different Text Classification Algorithms: An Assessment" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4 | Issue-1 , December 2019, URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd29869.pdf Paper URL: https://www.ijtsrd.com/computer-science/other/29869/analysis-of-different-text-classification-algorithms-an-assessment/adarsh-raushan
Explore the innovative world of trenchless pipe repair with our comprehensive guide, "The Benefits and Techniques of Trenchless Pipe Repair." This document delves into the modern methods of repairing underground pipes without the need for extensive excavation, highlighting the numerous advantages and the latest techniques used in the industry.
Learn about the cost savings, reduced environmental impact, and minimal disruption associated with trenchless technology. Discover detailed explanations of popular techniques such as pipe bursting, cured-in-place pipe (CIPP) lining, and directional drilling. Understand how these methods can be applied to various types of infrastructure, from residential plumbing to large-scale municipal systems.
Ideal for homeowners, contractors, engineers, and anyone interested in modern plumbing solutions, this guide provides valuable insights into why trenchless pipe repair is becoming the preferred choice for pipe rehabilitation. Stay informed about the latest advancements and best practices in the field.
Welcome to WIPAC Monthly the magazine brought to you by the LinkedIn Group Water Industry Process Automation & Control.
In this month's edition, along with this month's industry news to celebrate the 13 years since the group was created we have articles including
A case study of the used of Advanced Process Control at the Wastewater Treatment works at Lleida in Spain
A look back on an article on smart wastewater networks in order to see how the industry has measured up in the interim around the adoption of Digital Transformation in the Water Industry.
NO1 Uk best vashikaran specialist in delhi vashikaran baba near me online vas...Amil Baba Dawood bangali
Contact with Dawood Bhai Just call on +92322-6382012 and we'll help you. We'll solve all your problems within 12 to 24 hours and with 101% guarantee and with astrology systematic. If you want to take any personal or professional advice then also you can call us on +92322-6382012 , ONLINE LOVE PROBLEM & Other all types of Daily Life Problem's.Then CALL or WHATSAPP us on +92322-6382012 and Get all these problems solutions here by Amil Baba DAWOOD BANGALI
#vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore#blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #blackmagicforlove #blackmagicformarriage #aamilbaba #kalajadu #kalailam #taweez #wazifaexpert #jadumantar #vashikaranspecialist #astrologer #palmistry #amliyaat #taweez #manpasandshadi #horoscope #spiritual #lovelife #lovespell #marriagespell#aamilbabainpakistan #amilbabainkarachi #powerfullblackmagicspell #kalajadumantarspecialist #realamilbaba #AmilbabainPakistan #astrologerincanada #astrologerindubai #lovespellsmaster #kalajaduspecialist #lovespellsthatwork #aamilbabainlahore #Amilbabainuk #amilbabainspain #amilbabaindubai #Amilbabainnorway #amilbabainkrachi #amilbabainlahore #amilbabaingujranwalan #amilbabainislamabad
Cosmetic shop management system project report.pdfKamal Acharya
Buying new cosmetic products is difficult. It can even be scary for those who have sensitive skin and are prone to skin trouble. The information needed to alleviate this problem is on the back of each product, but it's thought to interpret those ingredient lists unless you have a background in chemistry.
Instead of buying and hoping for the best, we can use data science to help us predict which products may be good fits for us. It includes various function programs to do the above mentioned tasks.
Data file handling has been effectively used in the program.
The automated cosmetic shop management system should deal with the automation of general workflow and administration process of the shop. The main processes of the system focus on customer's request where the system is able to search the most appropriate products and deliver it to the customers. It should help the employees to quickly identify the list of cosmetic product that have reached the minimum quantity and also keep a track of expired date for each cosmetic product. It should help the employees to find the rack number in which the product is placed.It is also Faster and more efficient way.
About
Indigenized remote control interface card suitable for MAFI system CCR equipment. Compatible for IDM8000 CCR. Backplane mounted serial and TCP/Ethernet communication module for CCR remote access. IDM 8000 CCR remote control on serial and TCP protocol.
• Remote control: Parallel or serial interface.
• Compatible with MAFI CCR system.
• Compatible with IDM8000 CCR.
• Compatible with Backplane mount serial communication.
• Compatible with commercial and Defence aviation CCR system.
• Remote control system for accessing CCR and allied system over serial or TCP.
• Indigenized local Support/presence in India.
• Easy in configuration using DIP switches.
Technical Specifications
Indigenized remote control interface card suitable for MAFI system CCR equipment. Compatible for IDM8000 CCR. Backplane mounted serial and TCP/Ethernet communication module for CCR remote access. IDM 8000 CCR remote control on serial and TCP protocol.
Key Features
Indigenized remote control interface card suitable for MAFI system CCR equipment. Compatible for IDM8000 CCR. Backplane mounted serial and TCP/Ethernet communication module for CCR remote access. IDM 8000 CCR remote control on serial and TCP protocol.
• Remote control: Parallel or serial interface
• Compatible with MAFI CCR system
• Copatiable with IDM8000 CCR
• Compatible with Backplane mount serial communication.
• Compatible with commercial and Defence aviation CCR system.
• Remote control system for accessing CCR and allied system over serial or TCP.
• Indigenized local Support/presence in India.
Application
• Remote control: Parallel or serial interface.
• Compatible with MAFI CCR system.
• Compatible with IDM8000 CCR.
• Compatible with Backplane mount serial communication.
• Compatible with commercial and Defence aviation CCR system.
• Remote control system for accessing CCR and allied system over serial or TCP.
• Indigenized local Support/presence in India.
• Easy in configuration using DIP switches.
Sachpazis:Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Estimation in simple terms with Calculati...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
Terzaghi's soil bearing capacity theory, developed by Karl Terzaghi, is a fundamental principle in geotechnical engineering used to determine the bearing capacity of shallow foundations. This theory provides a method to calculate the ultimate bearing capacity of soil, which is the maximum load per unit area that the soil can support without undergoing shear failure. The Calculation HTML Code included.
Saudi Arabia stands as a titan in the global energy landscape, renowned for its abundant oil and gas resources. It's the largest exporter of petroleum and holds some of the world's most significant reserves. Let's delve into the top 10 oil and gas projects shaping Saudi Arabia's energy future in 2024.
Final project report on grocery store management system..pdfKamal Acharya
In today’s fast-changing business environment, it’s extremely important to be able to respond to client needs in the most effective and timely manner. If your customers wish to see your business online and have instant access to your products or services.
Online Grocery Store is an e-commerce website, which retails various grocery products. This project allows viewing various products available enables registered users to purchase desired products instantly using Paytm, UPI payment processor (Instant Pay) and also can place order by using Cash on Delivery (Pay Later) option. This project provides an easy access to Administrators and Managers to view orders placed using Pay Later and Instant Pay options.
In order to develop an e-commerce website, a number of Technologies must be studied and understood. These include multi-tiered architecture, server and client-side scripting techniques, implementation technologies, programming language (such as PHP, HTML, CSS, JavaScript) and MySQL relational databases. This is a project with the objective to develop a basic website where a consumer is provided with a shopping cart website and also to know about the technologies used to develop such a website.
This document will discuss each of the underlying technologies to create and implement an e- commerce website.
Overview of the fundamental roles in Hydropower generation and the components involved in wider Electrical Engineering.
This paper presents the design and construction of hydroelectric dams from the hydrologist’s survey of the valley before construction, all aspects and involved disciplines, fluid dynamics, structural engineering, generation and mains frequency regulation to the very transmission of power through the network in the United Kingdom.
Author: Robbie Edward Sayers
Collaborators and co editors: Charlie Sims and Connor Healey.
(C) 2024 Robbie E. Sayers
semantic annotation of documents a compar ative study
1. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-2, Issue-11, Nov- 2016]
Infogain Publication (Infogainpublication.com) ISSN : 2454-1311
www.ijaems.com Page | 1936
Semantic Annotation of Documents: A Compar-
ative Study
Hasna Abioui, Ali Idarrou, Ali Bouzit, Driss Mammass
IRF-SIC Laboratory, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Marocco
Abstract—Semantic annotation, which is considered one
of the semantic web applicative aspects, has been adopted
by researchers from different communities as a para-
mount solution that improves searching and retrieval of
information by promoting the richness of the content.
However, researchers are facing challenges concerning
both the quality and the relevance of the semantic annota-
tions attached to the annotated document against its con-
tent as well as its semantics, without ignoring those re-
garding automation process which is supposed to ensure
an optimal system for information indexing and retrieval.
In this article, we will introduce the semantic annotation
concept by presenting a state of the art including defini-
tions, features and a classification of annotation systems.
Systems and proposed approaches in the field will be
cited, as well as a study of some existing annotation tools.
This study will also pinpoint various problems and limita-
tions related to the annotation in order to offer solutions
for our future work.
Keywords— Document, Semantic Annotation, Meta-
data, Information Retrieval.
I. INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, the amount of digital data reaches an unprece-
dented stage and keeps growing each day. However, the
volume is not the only factor that leads digital data to
explosion; evidently, the richness of contents and also the
remarkable heterogeneity of structures have a significant
impact. So, faced with that explosion, the challenge is
how we can provide an improved management, a better
exploitation and an efficient understanding of the infor-
mation contained in these digital sources. Well, semantic
annotation became one of the treated alternatives in this
regard, that may handle these requirements by ensuring a
good comprehension of document contents, thus allowing
an easy exploitation, exchange, and shareability.
Otherwise, semantic annotation is the practical solution
that may promote the information retrieval either on the
web or in large databases by calling upon ontologies,
thesauri and data extraction and segmentation algorithms,
in order to enhance the richness of contents through the
attachment of descriptive notes by considering different
contexts from which these notes may come, the various
structures that can represent them and the relationship that
links both of them while continuously safeguarding strict
separation between the resources and their annotations
[1].
Different application domains appeal the semantic anno-
tation as a recent research field to evaluate its efficiency
on various content types and structures. For instance, the
electronic Medical Records (EMR) used in the healthcare
industry [2] [3] is one of these application fields. As a
matter of fact, an EMR can be created by a set of experts
in different medical sub-domains and who may have va-
rying levels of expertise, which explains the abundance
and the diversity of contained information in a patient’s
record, such as epidemiological studies, medical history,
lab work, etc. Practically, the collaborative annotation of
the EMR by those practitioners facilitates the access to
the needed information without having to study or ana-
lyze the entire record.
This paper is organized as follows: in the second section,
we shall survey different definitions of annotation in the
literature and its different features. We shall also distin-
guish between annotation and metadata. We then present
and compare three types of annotation, and complete the
section by listing and comparing various annotation tools
available nowadays. The third section will present exam-
ples from recent studies of several annotation systems.
They shall be categorized according to the types of docu-
ments they aim to annotate. Finally, in the fourth section,
we present a synthesis of the survey.
II. STATE OF THE ART
2.1 Annotation: what does it mean?
In the literature, annotation is defined as a critical or ex-
planatory note accompanying the text. In computer sci-
ence, different definitions are often cited. Authors in [4]
define the annotation as graphical or textual information
attached to a document or simply placed on it. Evidently,
when we talk about an electronic document, it may be
mono-media, multimedia or a web page within the seman-
tic web. Hence, the forms of annotation differ depending
on the interest and the purpose of the annotator. It might,
for instance, be that a resource user or reader who wishes
to annotate a paragraph in order to simplify its next read-
ing, or facilitate the access to the information according to
the intended use.
In this case, the annotation will probably be non-textual
i.e. graphical and expressed by underlining, highlighting
2. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-2, Issue-11, Nov- 2016]
Infogain Publication (Infogainpublication.com) ISSN : 2454-1311
www.ijaems.com Page | 1937
or pinpointing elements, so as to create a personalized re-
segmentation and reorganization of the document or the
paragraph. However, if the annotator is the resource’s
author, an expert or even a simple user wishing to enrich
the document by associating other information, this latter
will certainly be textual information selected according to
a well-defined context.
Similarly, the author in [5], believes that the form of
the annotation depends on its function, distinguishing
between two forms of textual annotation: (i) personal
annotations – called also individual annotations– that are
used to translate a term, highlight it by providing more
definitions, rephrase a passage, etc; and (ii) collective
annotations that introduce the notion of sharing and ex-
changing which allow annotators – readers and/or experts
analyzing a document – to ask questions, provide an-
swers, and give feedback in the form of annotations.
2.2 From Annotation to Semantic Annotation
With the appearance of the semantic web and during its
evolution, an annotation treats and concerns more specifi-
cally semantics, since it remains one of the applicative
aspects of the semantic web, then called semantic annota-
tion. In the same context, the W3C (World Wide Web
Consortium) defines a semantic annotation as a comment,
an explanation or any other external note that can be at-
tached to a web document or a part of it. According to
[22], semantic annotation designates both the activity
which consists of affixing a note regarding a part of a
document and also that resulting note; and it’s reflected in
the definition of a semantic information layer that gives
meaning and sense to the text. In [8] [7], authors added
that these notes assigned to the entities to annotate have a
well-structured and a formally described semantic which
is already defined within the ontology and presented as a
set of concepts, instances of concepts and relations be-
tween them, by indicating that these annotations and
metadata can be stored within the document itself or in a
separate one by using the URI (Universal Resource Iden-
tifier) referencing the annotated entity.
2.3 Semantic annotation versus Metadata
However, when analyzing different definitions presented
in the literature, we note that semantic annotation is often
related to another term which is metadata. True to its
name, the latter is a data about other data i.e. a data about
the document. Metadata is considered as a label attached
to a document that describes sufficiently its content, even-
tually its main features without needing to open it for
consultation. According to [6], metadata help to identify,
describe and localize electronic resources. Not too far
from this, [23] links metadata to an easy access, share,
and reusability of information.
Nevertheless, a distinction is made in [1] between seman-
tic annotation and metadata. The metadata term is more
independent than annotations and can itself be a resource
attached to the annotated resource as additional informa-
tion. A good example would be a summary prepared
separately for an article, a publication date for a docu-
ment, the duration of an audio or video clip, an artist's
name, or even the names of the instruments played in a
musical piece. While metadata is external, though possi-
bly attached, to the document, annotations lie within the
annotated resource and are written during the read-
ing/annotation process. In this case, it may be the lyrics of
a song, a sound played at a certain point in a presentation,
a textual string of words, sentences or even a paragraph.
2.4 A Semantic Annotation Systems Classification
A semantic annotation process, regardless of the anno-
tated resources type, can be manual, semi-automatic or
automatic. In other words, it concerns the annotation sys-
tem's automation level. In the following, we shall intro-
duce those three categories, weighing their pros and cons,
then concluding the subsection by comparing the most
commonly used annotation tools.
2.4.1 Manual Annotation
As its name indicates, manual annotation requires the
intervention of a human annotator who must provide de-
scriptive keywords. This intervention may be made at
several levels:
(i) In the resource drafting phase: in this case, the
author represents the annotator.
(ii) At the time of resource loading/tagging: in this
instance, generally, an appeal to an expert or group
of experts performing semantic, contextual and
collaborative annotation is needed; as in the case
of the patient records example that requires a col-
laborative and manual annotation by a group of
experts.
(iii) During consultation or final resource-use: here, it
concerns a complementary annotation for personal
use by adding notes and comments. As in the con-
text of E-learning or video-conferences, annota-
tions can be used in order to
facilitate note-taking, navigation platform, se-
quencing courses, etc.
2.4.2 Semi-automatic Annotation
Semi-automatic annotation is the combination of both:
manual and automatic annotation. It’s based on a human
intervention during an automatic process, by taking ad-
vantage of this latter’s efficiency on one side and the
accuracy of the manual annotation on the other. The user
may intervene at the beginning of the process as a re-
source annotator, by providing keywords and basic anno-
tations that the system must exploit to produce final anno-
tations. (Figure1.a). The annotator can intervene by the
end as well, but this time, as an expert that must validate
or cancel the annotations automatically proposed by the
system before generating final annotations (Figure 1.b).
3. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-2, Issue-11, Nov- 2016]
Infogain Publication (Infogainpublication.com) ISSN : 2454-1311
www.ijaems.com Page | 1938
Fig.1: Semi-Automatic Annotation
2.4.3 Automatic Annotation
Automatic annotation is performed by automated annotation tools without human intervention and relies on information
extraction heuristics and techniques (e.g. by exploiting redundancy), indexing and simple segmentation (data stream process-
ing, character strings, etc.) [7][8].
Table.1: Compares the three types cited above by summarizing their cons and pros:
TABLE I. A Comparison of Annotation Types
Annotation type Advantages Disadvantages
Manual
Annotation
- Superior in terms of quality: well targeted, relevant
and semantically precise.
- Selected keywords based on a human determination
of the resource semantic content.
Very time-consuming.
Being done by humans, it is highly
error-prone and can easily result in
syntactic errors and incorrect refer-
ences.
Semi-automatic
Annotation
- Ensures accurate and relevant annotation by combin-
ing human understanding with systematic efficiency.
- More efficient and less time consuming compared to
the manual annotation.
- More precise and leads to relevant and accurate
results compared to automatic annotation.
- Recommended for dynamic databases.
Still dependent on human interven-
tion, what makes it arduous and ex-
pensive process in terms of time and
used resources.
Automatic An-
notation
- Suitable for resources that have a large amount of
data to make a decision according to that to deduce
the qualified information to be annotations.
Lowering of quality and accuracy of
annotation if compared to manual
and semi-automatic annotation.
By weighing cons and pros of the three system categories
cited above, we notice that each one can be evoked in a
well-defined operating environment regardless of the
resource type. However, choosing the appropriate system
automation level depends on others criteria that we briefly
mention:
- Volume and number of resources to annotate: we can
only think about manual or semi-automatic annotation
as long as these two factors are reasonable and don’t
increase over time.
- Expected goal from these annotations: sometimes, we
look for detailed and more subtle semantic annotations
but other times, just simple and general annotations
are sufficient. Moreover, data and annotations granu-
larity is still believed to be the major limit for auto-
matic annotation since it’s hard to annotate data using
a high and fine enough level of granularity.
- If the resource to annotate already has minimal seman-
tic information on which an automatic annotation sys-
tem would be based to produce semantic annotations:
Here, we're going beyond the resource itself by treat-
ing its structures, in order to extract all useful deemed
information for a profitable automatic annotation
process in terms of efficiency and quality. In the op-
4. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-2, Issue-11, Nov- 2016]
Infogain Publication (Infogainpublication.com) ISSN : 2454-1311
www.ijaems.com Page | 1939
posite case, human intervention providing this infor-
mation would be needed either individually or collec-
tively.
- Sometimes, even the resource can provide semantic
information by using information extraction tools and
treated through TAL (the natural Language's Auto-
matic Treatment) tools, the process may be limited or
even blocked during data's operational phase. That
blockage is often linked to the resource domain speci-
ficity, for example, the lack of domain ontologies or
semantic networks, etc. Several related works faced
this problem, such as [24] having as objective to anno-
tate images semantically by using keywords in gastro-
enterology, so the domain specificity had prompted
researchers to conceive and develop their own polyps
ontology in conjunction with standard reasonings in
description logic SHOIQ+. The same problem was
mentioned in [25], when researchers were forced to
create a lexico-semantic network linked to radiology
in the absence of a french version of radiology an-
thologies as RadLex, a bilingual one offering just
English and German versions. So, in the two and other
similar cases, the annotator has to intervene to validate
the suggested annotations since that concerns new rea-
sonings and semantic models.
2.4.4 Annotation tools comparison
In this subsection, we shall compare the most commonly
used annotation tools and often cited in the literature. We
compare them using different criteria, namely the automa-
tion level, the resource types that they can annotate, and
the languages and schemas used to generate annotations.
In fact, the majority of these tools are used in the context
of the semantic web, as they treat web pages as resources.
Some tools are limited to adding free text as comments or
notes. Others on the other hand aim to semantically clar-
ify the resource content. All of them, however, use RDF
(Resource Description Framework) as a basic language
for the formal description of resources. Still, the formats
used in domain ontologies differ from one tool to another.
Generally, they vary between predetermined ontologies
implemented in RDFS (RDF Schema) and DAML + OIL
(DARPA Agent Markup Language and Ontology Infer-
ence Layer) later superseded by OWL (Web Ontology
Language).
Other tools are reserved for the annotation of audio-visual
documents. For these, the annotation is manual and in-
volves adding comments to documentary content, usually
collaboratively. Note that manual annotation systems
despite their precision are far from ideal, especially in the
context of the web, where we need to treat a huge amount
of resources and information. On the other hand, semi-
automatic and automatic systems may yield relatively
inferior results, depending on the information extraction
tools and the learning techniques they use.
In fact, these information extraction tools and the differ-
ent learning algorithms cited in this regard – which are
the basis of semi-automatic and automatic annotation
tools and systems – will be the object of our future re-
search in which we try to explore the possibilities in view
of improving the annotation process. But at this point, we
have restricted our attention to the related works on anno-
tation to elucidate the problem of annotation and informa-
tion retrieval in various types of resources, adopting vari-
ous forms of architectures.
Table.2 shows a detailed comparison of annotation tools
according to already mentioned criteria.
Soft-
ware
tool
Type
Of
annota-
tion
Types of
re-
sources
anno-
tated
Informa-
tion
extraction
tool
Metadata
schema and
ontology used
Language used
for generating
annotations
Observations
Annotea
[9]
Manual
annotatio
n
HTML,
XML
documen
ts
―
- uses
elements/terms
from
DublinCore
(author, date,
title, corpus…).
- free-text
annotation
(comments,
notes).
- domain
ontology
formatted in
RDFS.
Annotations
output as RDF
triplets and
linked to
documents with
XPointers
- Designed for W3C.
Allows simple text
annotations of web page
content, structured and
non-structured.
- No explicit semantics
on content or the
concepts in it.
5. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-2, Issue-11, Nov- 2016]
Infogain Publication (Infogainpublication.com) ISSN : 2454-1311
www.ijaems.com Page | 1940
TABLE I. A COMPARISON OF ANNOTATION TOOLS
V-
Annotea
[10]
Audiovis
ual
documen
ts
―
- Uses simple
elements/terms
from
DublinCore.
- free-text
annotations:
comments,
remarks, etc.
Description of
document
elements in
MPEG-7
- Allows collaborative
indexation, navigation,
annotation and
discussion of video
contents amongst
several groups in
geographically
dispersed locations
The
CREAM
Model
[11]
HTML,
XML
documen
ts
―
- Uses domain
ontologies
DAML+OIL /
OWL.
Annotations
saved in
document file as
RDF
tags/attachments
.
- It's a general open and
complete model
allowing the
development of
annotation tools from
ontologies.
Ontomat
Annotize
r
Web
page
fragment
s
(HTML,
XML)
―
- Uses domain
ontologies
DAML+OIL /
OWL.
Annotations
written out in
RDF.
-A tool implementing
the CREAM model.
- M-Ontomat-Annotizer
is also based on this
model but it's meant for
multimedia documents.
MnM
same
principle
as
Mellita
Semi-
automati
c
annotatio
n
HTML/
XML
documen
ts
Amilcare
- RDF.
- uses
predefined
ontologies
DAML+OIL
and OCML
Generates
annotations in
RDF, XML
- Learning and
information extraction
is done by Amilcare,
while correction and
validation of the
annotations are manual
S-
CREAM
[13]
HTML
documen
ts
Amilcare
- uses ontologies
in DAML+OIL DAML+OIL
- manual annotation
using CREAM.
Armadill
o [12]
Automati
c
annotatio
n
HTML
documen
ts
Amilcare
- uses domain
ontologies in
RDFS.
Annotations in
RDF triplets
- Uses redundancy on
the web to establish
relationships between
instances.
AeroDA
ML [14]
HTML
documen
ts
AeroText
- uses ontologies
in DAML+OIL.
Generation of
automatic
annotations in
DAML.
- The web version uses
a generic ontology. The
client/server version
supports annotations
with custom-built
ontologies.
6. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-2, Issue-11, Nov- 2016]
Infogain Publication (Infogainpublication.com) ISSN : 2454-1311
www.ijaems.com Page | 1941
III. RELATED WORKS
As stated previously, annotation is becoming an essential
activity for an easy resources exploitation and manage-
ment, thanks to its simple data manipulation and its low
time-consuming and that what makes it more and more
use in various research fields, such as e-learning, health-
care, etc. In the following, we examine some annotation
related works from different categories in order to sum-
marize various adopted techniques and concepts.
3.1 Annotation in the semantic web
In the context of the semantic web, [15] proposes an an-
notation system in three phases for web pages.
A web page annotation system is proposed in [15] by
using three phases: First, it starts with the marking and
automatic identification of relevant elements brought
together in a corpus in order to associate them with prede-
termined ontology concepts. Then comes the learning
process, which exploits the tree structure of the web page
provided by DOM (Document Object Model) in order to
deduce for each ontology concept and role an assimilated
parallel path from the web page. Finally, it comes up with
an annotation based on the generation of ontology in-
stances by direct application of the obtained assimilated
paths. One of the major advantages of this approach is
that it generates not only instances of concepts but also
instances of the roles of concepts in ontology. However,
the use of the tree structure is usually limited by the de-
gree of regularity in the web page and the extent of its
conformity with the hierarchy represented in the ontol-
ogy. In the same context, [16] opts for a semi-automatic
annotation always according to the semantics of the web
page, but without the use of its DOM structure. Instead,
[16] opts for the use of the Semantic Radar tool, which
performs automatic metadata extraction, defining the
semantics of the page with descriptor types FOAF (Friend
of a friend), SIOC (Semantically-Interlinked Online
Communities), DOAP (Description of A Project) and
RDFa (Resource Description Framework in attributes)
with the purpose of generating an initial source of analy-
sis for each page. The next step is to reinforce the rele-
vance of the annotation by pairing the obtained results
with others offered by domain ontology, according to the
rules of equivalence and an annotation model. At this
point, two types of ontologies are considered: (i) an en-
riched domain ontology (OWL) and (ii) a FOAF and
SIOC ontology (.RDF). Finally, we get for each web
page, a file containing metadata in RDF format. The ex-
perimental results are quite satisfactory according to [16]:
45% of web pages are annotated especially in a vast envi-
ronment, containing heterogeneous resources such as the
web.
In [17], another annotation system is presented:
'DYNOSYS'. It has a distributed architecture that supports
collaborative work and it is platform-independent. Unlike
the system in [16], generated annotations in [17] are in
XML format.
3.2 Annotation of multimedia documents
As for the area of multimedia documents, we look at vari-
ous studies that are interested in very specific fields, and
which, through their proposals and approaches, have been
able to satisfactorily meet the varying needs of the practi-
tioners in these fields.
For instance, [19] presents an approach that aims to au-
tomating manual annotation tools dealing with the annota-
tion of sign language videos, by proposing architecture
capable of providing a distributed system hosting auto-
matic annotation assistants on remote servers. Data de-
scription is in XML format and is structured in the form
of annotation graphs that annotation tools must be able to
import and export.
In the medical field, [18] proposes a method of know-
ledge creation, that is based on the cooperative annotation
of surgical videos by practitioners and domain experts, by
building and sharing objects, results and observations
which will be useful for the extraction of the video's se-
mantics. To this end, two processes are put in place: one
for creating concepts and the other for learning them.
Each of the two processes goes through three phases: (i)
an individual observation phase which allows the partici-
pants to annotate videos, each according to his/her level
of expertise, his viewpoint etc. (ii) a group negotiation
phase, and finally (iii) a concept elaboration phase. Each
process iterates as many times as necessary to achieve a
set of common and coherent annotations between group
members, which makes the task difficult and complicated
despite the proven improvement in practices according to
experimental studies. Regarding the semantic data, on-
tologies and annotations are structured in RDFS / RDF
format.
Two other works deal with the annotation and the descrip-
tion of multimedia documents using XML graphs similar-
ly to the previous work. The first system, proposed in [6]
is a meta-modeling of semi-structured data by defining a
set of metadata for each different medium – text, image,
audio and video – in order to have a unified presentation
of annotations for multimedia documents based on the
content and its semantics. The metadata structuring is
done in XML documents called meta-documents contain-
ing textual metadata or links to information in the case of
non-textual metadata. The second is a video annotation
system presented in [20], which proposes to organize and
present the annotations in the form of graphs by introduc-
ing the description schemas and dimensions of analysis.
The aim is to ensure (i) easy management of an extended
vocabulary, and (ii) an easy, fast, customized query-and-
response construction system when searching for infor-
mation.
7. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-2, Issue-11, Nov- 2016]
Infogain Publication (Infogainpublication.com) ISSN : 2454-1311
www.ijaems.com Page | 1942
3.3 Annotation as a part of E-learning
In the e-learning field, some approaches are directed to-
wards resources annotation. They focus on platforms and
systems that allow instructors to prepare course materials
and make them available to students. [21] is one of works
coming in that context. It proposes an annotation model
dedicated to teachers based on three facets of learning:
cognitive, semantic and contextual. This model, translated
into an architecture, gives birth to two subsystems. One of
them allows the management of learning contexts while
the other takes care of annotations management that are
created and transmitted in XML, to ensure seamless
communication and exchange between different modules
of the model.
In the following, we present a discussion in summary
form drawn from the aforementioned works.
IV. SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION
By surveying the literature of semantic annotation, some
indispensable requirements come to mind in order, to
create a complete and highly performed annotation sys-
tem that fits the needs and expectations of practitioners.
From the perspective of automation level, we notice that
manual annotation systems offer a high accuracy. More-
over, they are outdated and consuming in terms of time
and manpower. For entirely automated systems, the qual-
ity of results remains inferior, which explain the use of
semi-automatic annotation systems that combines the
strengths of both worlds. In other words, the more a sys-
tem combines principles of manual annotation – collabo-
rative annotation, manually-made ontologies (generic
domain-specific, predefined, or custom-made for a spe-
cific need), the definition of concepts, models and rules
by human agents – with a well-optimized automation, the
better the efficiency and the quality of the annotation. The
better integrated the extensions and tools of descriptor
semantics and data extraction, the more satisfactory and
efficient the annotations are. Regarding the physical ar-
chitecture, a variety of works emphasize on the distribu-
tion concept. A distributed architecture improves the sys-
tem effectiveness by, (i) guaranteeing the high availability
of services against the interruption, (ii) minimizing the
critical failure points, (iii) parallelizing tasks and (iv)
load-balancing the work over cluster nodes.
In terms of data and resources description, collaborative
annotation stands out as the most preferred solution when
creating abundant, reliable and very specific annotations
for partially or entirely document annotation regardless of
the resource type. Certain works suggest to begin with a
single annotation before a negotiation step between anno-
tators, to discuss and choose the most semantically appro-
priate concepts. Others choose the creation of collabora-
tive annotation sessions as forums, to exchange all-out
quantity of information and knowledge related to the
same resource from different points of view and annota-
tors with different level of expertise, possibly even by
using various annotation forms. Concerning the serializa-
tion, storage and transformation of semantic data, ontolo-
gies are often encoded in RDFS and OWL, while annota-
tions are generated using RDF format. In fact, RDF is
defined as the semantic web’s greatest achievement. It is
by a margin the best resource description standard that fits
most significant needs. Its formal description of web re-
sources guarantees efficient machine-readability and
automatic processing of metadata and annotation.
As for the annotation of multimedia documents, we no-
ticed that most practitioners opt for an XML graphs based
description, due to the need to provide some structure to
the document to ensure data communication and ex-
change while still successfully maintaining document’s
description.
V. CONCLUSION
Document annotation is becoming more and more crucial
and indispensable for a high-performance document man-
aging and exploitation. Although in the current study, we
highlight some problems related to both document anno-
tation tools and methods. So, first, we define broadly the
concept of annotation, by providing an overview of the
state of the art while surveying the main annotation tools
and related works in the literature, then we end with a
synthesis. Based on that, our own semantic annotation
system will be developed according to high quality and
performance annotation, having in mind multiples types
of media, document structures and the system automation
level.
REFERENCES
[1] Y.Prié, S.Garlatti, “Annotations et métadonnées
dans le Web sémantique”, in Revue I3 Information-
Interaction - Intelligence, Numéro Hors-série Web
sémantique, 2004, 24 pp.
[2] S. Bringay, C. Barry, J. Charlet, “Un modèle pour
les annotations du dossier patient in formatisé”,
P. Salembier, M. Zacklad (eds.), Vol. Annotations
dans les documents pour l'action, pp. 47-
67, Hermespublishing, 2006.
[3] S. Bringay, C. Barry, J. Charlet, “Les annotations
pour gérer les connaissances du dossier patient”,
Actes IC 2005, Nice (France): 73-84.
[4] E. Desmontils, C. Jacquin, “Annotations sur le Web
: notes de lecture”, in Journées Scientifiques Web
Sémantique, (Action Spécifique STIC CNRS), Paris,
France, 2002, pp 10-11.
[5] G.Cabanac, “Annotation de ressources électroniques
sur le Web : formes et usages”, Master Report, Paul
Sabatier University, June 2005.
8. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science (IJAEMS) [Vol-2, Issue-11, Nov- 2016]
Infogain Publication (Infogainpublication.com) ISSN : 2454-1311
www.ijaems.com Page | 1938
Fig.1: Semi-Automatic Annotation
2.4.3 Automatic Annotation
Automatic annotation is performed by automated annotation tools without human intervention and relies on information
extraction heuristics and techniques (e.g. by exploiting redundancy), indexing and simple segmentation (data stream process-
ing, character strings, etc.) [7][8].
Table.1: Compares the three types cited above by summarizing their cons and pros:
TABLE I. A Comparison of Annotation Types
Annotation type Advantages Disadvantages
Manual
Annotation
- Superior in terms of quality: well targeted, relevant
and semantically precise.
- Selected keywords based on a human determination
of the resource semantic content.
Very time-consuming.
Being done by humans, it is highly
error-prone and can easily result in
syntactic errors and incorrect refer-
ences.
Semi-automatic
Annotation
- Ensures accurate and relevant annotation by combin-
ing human understanding with systematic efficiency.
- More efficient and less time consuming compared to
the manual annotation.
- More precise and leads to relevant and accurate
results compared to automatic annotation.
- Recommended for dynamic databases.
Still dependent on human interven-
tion, what makes it arduous and ex-
pensive process in terms of time and
used resources.
Automatic An-
notation
- Suitable for resources that have a large amount of
data to make a decision according to that to deduce
the qualified information to be annotations.
Lowering of quality and accuracy of
annotation if compared to manual
and semi-automatic annotation.
By weighing cons and pros of the three system categories
cited above, we notice that each one can be evoked in a
well-defined operating environment regardless of the
resource type. However, choosing the appropriate system
automation level depends on others criteria that we briefly
mention:
- Volume and number of resources to annotate: we can
only think about manual or semi-automatic annotation
as long as these two factors are reasonable and don’t
increase over time.
- Expected goal from these annotations: sometimes, we
look for detailed and more subtle semantic annotations
but other times, just simple and general annotations
are sufficient. Moreover, data and annotations granu-
larity is still believed to be the major limit for auto-
matic annotation since it’s hard to annotate data using
a high and fine enough level of granularity.
- If the resource to annotate already has minimal seman-
tic information on which an automatic annotation sys-
tem would be based to produce semantic annotations:
Here, we're going beyond the resource itself by treat-
ing its structures, in order to extract all useful deemed
information for a profitable automatic annotation
process in terms of efficiency and quality. In the op-