HOWTO SELL
PPMTOYOUR
EXECUTIVES
PROVING VALUE WITH FORRESTER’S TOTAL
ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT FOR PROJECT
ONLINE
THE CHALLENGE
‱ As Project Managers, we all understand the
value and benefits of a Project & Portfolio
Management solution. But, these are often
identified as soft-costs and not tangible benefits
to the business.
‱ Forrester’s TEI report on Project Online
provides a vehicle by which you can sell PPM to
your boardroom, breaking down reporting
efficiencies, improved resource utilization, and
simplified IT costs into hard benefits that will
resonate with your executives.
2
OVERVIEW
3
Project Online equipped project managers (PMs) and project
management offices (PMOs) with the tools and reports necessary to
overcome these challenges.
These customers faced challenges including a lack of performance
visibility, difficulty in estimating resource demands and project
workload, and poor communication across teams and with
executives.
To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with
this investment, Forrester interviewed several customers with
multiple years of experience using Project Online.
FORRESTERTEI
FRAMEWORK &
METHODOLOGY
The TEI (Total Economic Impact) methodology
helps companies demonstrate, justify, and
realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to
both senior management and other key
business stakeholders.
‱ Due Diligence
‱ Customer Interviews
‱ Composite Organization
‱ Financial Model Framework
‱ Case Study
4
WHY
PROJECT
ONLINE?
✓Prior to using Project Online, the
customers documented project
performance using either a desktop
project management solution or
spreadsheets and word processing
software.
✓This resulted in time intensive manual
processes that hindered collaboration
and the ability to utilize project data
with Enterprise Resource Planning
(ERP) solutions and other planning
systems.
5
QUANTIFIED BENEFITS
‱ Utilizing Project Online increased PMs
ability to build and generate worthwhile
reporting on project performance,
resource utilization, and project
materials needed.
‱ Previously, this reporting would have
taken two dedicated resources to
generate, but now it can be done with
less than one fully dedicated resource.
‱ PMs previously would spend 15 hours
per month reconciling project spending
with Finance
6
‱ Project Online increased visibility into
project performance allowing PMs to
gain a better understanding of their
resource needs and predict with
greater accuracy when they would
require more or less resources.
‱ This helped ensure projects were
staffed appropriately and ultimately
reduced the amount of overtime
required by 83%.
REPORTING EFFICIENCIES RESULTED
IN 60%TIME SAVINGS FOR PROJECT
MANAGERS
INCREASED PROJECTVISIBILITY
LEDTO 83% REDUCTION IN
OVERTIME COSTS
INCREASING CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION
“On-time delivery is the most important
factor for our customers.“
‱ After deploying Project Online, many of
the interviewed customers reported
increases in on-time delivery percentages.
‱ One customer even saw on-time delivery
go from 8% to 40%, with realistic goals of
achieving 70%, resulting in increased
sales and improved customer satisfaction.
7
VALUETHAT GROWSWITHYOU
Project Online enables organizations to
mature their project management
practices.
‱ In addition to improving project management
processes to drive efficiencies throughout the
project, one interviewed organization was
able to restructure, improving their project
management processes and increasing
functional accountability.
8
MATURE PRACTICES
Project Online, as a cloud-based solution,
reduces infrastructure costs and increases
scalability.
‱ Project Online grows with organizations.
Instead of having to invest upfront in
infrastructure, maintenance and ongoing
upgrades, Project Online provides customers
with the latest software updates
automatically.
‱ As organizations grow and add more projects
and/or locations, subscriptions are easily
expanded.
SIMPLIFY IT
SIMPLIFY IT:TOTAL COST OF OWNERSHIP COMPARISON
9
Upgrade: 5 Year Outlook Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Licensing $ 138,963.36 $ 138,963.36 $ 138,963.36 $ 138,963.36 $ 138,963.36
Administration/Patching/Maint. $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00
Hardware/Infrastructure $ 50,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000.00
Data Center Costs/DR $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00
Partner Migration $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000.00
Total $ 518,963.36 $ 268,963.36 $ 268,963.36 $ 268,963.36 $ 518,963.36
Online: 5 Year Outlook Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Licensing/Hosting $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20
Partner Migration $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Total $ 429,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20
Total 5-Year On-Prem Investment $ 1,844,816.80
Total 5-Year Project Online Investment $ 1,348,406.00
Total 5-Year Projected Project Online Savings $ 496,410.80
THREEYEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
10
THE PROJECT ONLINE CUSTOMER JOURNEY:
BEFORE AND AFTER PROJECT ONLINE IMPLEMENTATION
11
‱ Annual Revenue of $220
million
‱ 560 employees, 12
locations
‱ 145 subscriptions: 60
Professional, 85 Essentials
MANUFACTURING
COMPANY
FOOD AND BEVERAGE
PRODUCER
CONSUMER GOODS
COMPANY
MAJOR MANUFACTURING
COMPANY
‱ Annual Revenue of $ 1
billion
‱ 2,500 Employees, 8
locations
‱ 250 subscriptions; 50
Professional, 200 Essentials
‱ Annual Revenue of $20
billion
‱ 25,000 employees, 2
locations
‱ 400 subcriptions; 188
Professional, 212
Essentials
‱ Annual Revenue of $50+
billion
‱ 125,000 employees,
180+ locations
‱ 3,000 subscriptions, 700
Professional, 2,300
Essentials
KEY CHALLENGES
‱ Project Management Processes were manual and
time consuming.
‱ Most companies were utilizing spreadsheets and
word processing documents to manage project
portfolios.
‱ Reporting lacked the ability to consolidate or roll-up
data from so many different project spreadsheets.
‱ No way to collaborate across projects or share project
forecasts across the company.
12
INEFFICIENT PROJECT
MANAGEMENT PROCESSES For decision makers, it was difficult to make
unilateral decisions without having the proper
information available to them.
For PMs, it was hard to manage resource
availability and timing since there was not a
central database in which they could look across
projects to understand resource needs.
The lack of visibility led to budget overruns and
missed deadlines.
LACK OFVISIBILITY INTO
PROJECT PERFORMANCE
13
KEY CHALLENGES CONTINUED

Immature project management practices
limited ability to grow the organization
“Our previous solution didn’t initially
work well, it wasn’t scalable but with
Project Online it meets the criteria that
users need” – Actual Customer
“We didn’t have access to information
and with 120 projects, it was nearly
impossible to integrate it into a central
database, tie to the ERP and sales
forecasting systems, and then report on
it” - Director of global IT & systems
14
THE RESULTS!
Increased Transparency into Project
Performance
“By adopting Project Online, it gave our
project managers information to do their
job better and be more proactive which
benefits the business across the board.”
“Financial transparency of data enabled a
new form of decision making that helped
with our strategic planning process
now
they have one version of the truth.”
15
THE RESULTS!
Increased Transparency into Project
Performance
With Project Online, it was clear that
having greater visibility and transparency
into project performance equipped PMs
and PMOs with the necessary information
to better manage projects and make
informed decisions.
“The business always wants us to deliver
projects, but we don’t have the capacity.
With Project Online, we are able to equip
our CIO to have informed conversations
with business VPs
”
16
THE RESULTS!
Improved Customer Satisfaction and
On-time Delivery with Better Resource
Utilization
Customer satisfaction
increased with the
improvement in on-time
deliveries
attributed to better resource
utilization.
Project Online
gave organizations the
ability to allocate resources to projects,
forecast workload and completion dates
accurately, as well as better align skillsets
to specific roles.
“The trending information is really vital in
terms of on-time delivery.” On-time
deliveries went from 85% to 95%.
17
THE RESULTS!
Efficiencies in Project Management
Processes
“Monthly reporting cycles used to take
twice as long.”
The improved productivity with reporting
has allowed PMs to focus their time to
ensure projects are delivered on-time and
under budget.
“
if we are trending negative, we take
action. Overall our on-time delivery
percentage has increased by 10
percentage points.”
18
THE RESULTS!
Improved Collaboration with Cloud-
based Project Management
“Project Online has cooperative project
dependencies which provides accurate
timelines and milestones for other
projects.”
Having a cloud-based project
management system allows organizations
to share learnings across projects and
locations.
This allowed them to get to market faster
and improve their speed of delivery.
QUANTIFIABLE RESULTS
19
QUANTIFIABLE
RESULTS
20
BQUICK@MICROSOFT.COM
WWW.MICROSOFT.COM/PROJECT
THANKYOU
CUSTOMIZETHISTEMPLATE
Template Editing
Instructions and Feedback
22

Selling PPM to your Executives

  • 1.
    HOWTO SELL PPMTOYOUR EXECUTIVES PROVING VALUEWITH FORRESTER’S TOTAL ECONOMIC IMPACT REPORT FOR PROJECT ONLINE
  • 2.
    THE CHALLENGE ‱ AsProject Managers, we all understand the value and benefits of a Project & Portfolio Management solution. But, these are often identified as soft-costs and not tangible benefits to the business. ‱ Forrester’s TEI report on Project Online provides a vehicle by which you can sell PPM to your boardroom, breaking down reporting efficiencies, improved resource utilization, and simplified IT costs into hard benefits that will resonate with your executives. 2
  • 3.
    OVERVIEW 3 Project Online equippedproject managers (PMs) and project management offices (PMOs) with the tools and reports necessary to overcome these challenges. These customers faced challenges including a lack of performance visibility, difficulty in estimating resource demands and project workload, and poor communication across teams and with executives. To better understand the benefits, costs, and risks associated with this investment, Forrester interviewed several customers with multiple years of experience using Project Online.
  • 4.
    FORRESTERTEI FRAMEWORK & METHODOLOGY The TEI(Total Economic Impact) methodology helps companies demonstrate, justify, and realize the tangible value of IT initiatives to both senior management and other key business stakeholders. ‱ Due Diligence ‱ Customer Interviews ‱ Composite Organization ‱ Financial Model Framework ‱ Case Study 4
  • 5.
    WHY PROJECT ONLINE? ✓Prior to usingProject Online, the customers documented project performance using either a desktop project management solution or spreadsheets and word processing software. ✓This resulted in time intensive manual processes that hindered collaboration and the ability to utilize project data with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) solutions and other planning systems. 5
  • 6.
    QUANTIFIED BENEFITS ‱ UtilizingProject Online increased PMs ability to build and generate worthwhile reporting on project performance, resource utilization, and project materials needed. ‱ Previously, this reporting would have taken two dedicated resources to generate, but now it can be done with less than one fully dedicated resource. ‱ PMs previously would spend 15 hours per month reconciling project spending with Finance 6 ‱ Project Online increased visibility into project performance allowing PMs to gain a better understanding of their resource needs and predict with greater accuracy when they would require more or less resources. ‱ This helped ensure projects were staffed appropriately and ultimately reduced the amount of overtime required by 83%. REPORTING EFFICIENCIES RESULTED IN 60%TIME SAVINGS FOR PROJECT MANAGERS INCREASED PROJECTVISIBILITY LEDTO 83% REDUCTION IN OVERTIME COSTS
  • 7.
    INCREASING CUSTOMER SATISFACTION “On-time deliveryis the most important factor for our customers.“ ‱ After deploying Project Online, many of the interviewed customers reported increases in on-time delivery percentages. ‱ One customer even saw on-time delivery go from 8% to 40%, with realistic goals of achieving 70%, resulting in increased sales and improved customer satisfaction. 7
  • 8.
    VALUETHAT GROWSWITHYOU Project Onlineenables organizations to mature their project management practices. ‱ In addition to improving project management processes to drive efficiencies throughout the project, one interviewed organization was able to restructure, improving their project management processes and increasing functional accountability. 8 MATURE PRACTICES Project Online, as a cloud-based solution, reduces infrastructure costs and increases scalability. ‱ Project Online grows with organizations. Instead of having to invest upfront in infrastructure, maintenance and ongoing upgrades, Project Online provides customers with the latest software updates automatically. ‱ As organizations grow and add more projects and/or locations, subscriptions are easily expanded. SIMPLIFY IT
  • 9.
    SIMPLIFY IT:TOTAL COSTOF OWNERSHIP COMPARISON 9 Upgrade: 5 Year Outlook Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Licensing $ 138,963.36 $ 138,963.36 $ 138,963.36 $ 138,963.36 $ 138,963.36 Administration/Patching/Maint. $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 $ 80,000.00 Hardware/Infrastructure $ 50,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 50,000.00 Data Center Costs/DR $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Partner Migration $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000.00 Total $ 518,963.36 $ 268,963.36 $ 268,963.36 $ 268,963.36 $ 518,963.36 Online: 5 Year Outlook Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Licensing/Hosting $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 Partner Migration $ 200,000.00 $ - $ - $ - $ - Total $ 429,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 $ 229,681.20 Total 5-Year On-Prem Investment $ 1,844,816.80 Total 5-Year Project Online Investment $ 1,348,406.00 Total 5-Year Projected Project Online Savings $ 496,410.80
  • 10.
  • 11.
    THE PROJECT ONLINECUSTOMER JOURNEY: BEFORE AND AFTER PROJECT ONLINE IMPLEMENTATION 11 ‱ Annual Revenue of $220 million ‱ 560 employees, 12 locations ‱ 145 subscriptions: 60 Professional, 85 Essentials MANUFACTURING COMPANY FOOD AND BEVERAGE PRODUCER CONSUMER GOODS COMPANY MAJOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY ‱ Annual Revenue of $ 1 billion ‱ 2,500 Employees, 8 locations ‱ 250 subscriptions; 50 Professional, 200 Essentials ‱ Annual Revenue of $20 billion ‱ 25,000 employees, 2 locations ‱ 400 subcriptions; 188 Professional, 212 Essentials ‱ Annual Revenue of $50+ billion ‱ 125,000 employees, 180+ locations ‱ 3,000 subscriptions, 700 Professional, 2,300 Essentials
  • 12.
    KEY CHALLENGES ‱ ProjectManagement Processes were manual and time consuming. ‱ Most companies were utilizing spreadsheets and word processing documents to manage project portfolios. ‱ Reporting lacked the ability to consolidate or roll-up data from so many different project spreadsheets. ‱ No way to collaborate across projects or share project forecasts across the company. 12 INEFFICIENT PROJECT MANAGEMENT PROCESSES For decision makers, it was difficult to make unilateral decisions without having the proper information available to them. For PMs, it was hard to manage resource availability and timing since there was not a central database in which they could look across projects to understand resource needs. The lack of visibility led to budget overruns and missed deadlines. LACK OFVISIBILITY INTO PROJECT PERFORMANCE
  • 13.
    13 KEY CHALLENGES CONTINUED
 Immatureproject management practices limited ability to grow the organization “Our previous solution didn’t initially work well, it wasn’t scalable but with Project Online it meets the criteria that users need” – Actual Customer “We didn’t have access to information and with 120 projects, it was nearly impossible to integrate it into a central database, tie to the ERP and sales forecasting systems, and then report on it” - Director of global IT & systems
  • 14.
    14 THE RESULTS! Increased Transparencyinto Project Performance “By adopting Project Online, it gave our project managers information to do their job better and be more proactive which benefits the business across the board.” “Financial transparency of data enabled a new form of decision making that helped with our strategic planning process
now they have one version of the truth.”
  • 15.
    15 THE RESULTS! Increased Transparencyinto Project Performance With Project Online, it was clear that having greater visibility and transparency into project performance equipped PMs and PMOs with the necessary information to better manage projects and make informed decisions. “The business always wants us to deliver projects, but we don’t have the capacity. With Project Online, we are able to equip our CIO to have informed conversations with business VPs
”
  • 16.
    16 THE RESULTS! Improved CustomerSatisfaction and On-time Delivery with Better Resource Utilization Customer satisfaction
increased with the improvement in on-time deliveries
attributed to better resource utilization. Project Online
gave organizations the ability to allocate resources to projects, forecast workload and completion dates accurately, as well as better align skillsets to specific roles. “The trending information is really vital in terms of on-time delivery.” On-time deliveries went from 85% to 95%.
  • 17.
    17 THE RESULTS! Efficiencies inProject Management Processes “Monthly reporting cycles used to take twice as long.” The improved productivity with reporting has allowed PMs to focus their time to ensure projects are delivered on-time and under budget. “
if we are trending negative, we take action. Overall our on-time delivery percentage has increased by 10 percentage points.”
  • 18.
    18 THE RESULTS! Improved Collaborationwith Cloud- based Project Management “Project Online has cooperative project dependencies which provides accurate timelines and milestones for other projects.” Having a cloud-based project management system allows organizations to share learnings across projects and locations. This allowed them to get to market faster and improve their speed of delivery.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.