Designating safe anchorage points is a critical step in providing fall protection solutions. During this webinar, we will review the key types of anchorages, design loads and variables to consider when selecting fall protection anchorage points.
BEST Call Girls In Old Faridabad ✨ 9773824855 ✨ Escorts Service In Delhi Ncr,
Evaluating Anchorages
1. SELECTING ANCHORAGE POINTS
LJB WEBINAR SERIES: MAY 2013
THOM KRAMER, P.E., C.S.P. – LJB INC.
(937) 259-5120; TKRAMER@LJBINC.COM
2. BOTTOM LINE UP FRONT
Just because your anchorage won’t fail doesn’t mean it is
safe.
Our focus on what people tie off to needs to catch up with
our focus on getting workers to tie off.
3. ACTION PLAN
1. Use the worksheet to evaluate 5-10 anchorages that you
know are used in your organization
• Temporary and permanent
2. Identify 2-3 systems where you can use the worksheet to
plan systems
10. ANSI DEFINITIONS
Designed by a
Qualified
Person
Must be used
for HLL
Certified
Designated by
a Competent
Person
Unquestionably
strong
elements
Non-
Certified
13. ANSI I-14.1 ANCHORAGE DESIGN LOADS
PERSONAL FALL ARREST SYSTEM:
5,000 pounds per employee attached
Designed, installed and used as part of a complete
PFAS which maintains a safety factor of at least 2
EQUIPMENT TIEBACK:
Capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds
19. VARIABLES TO CONSIDER
Span and size of member
Material(s)
Additional loads
Supports
Deterioration and corrosion
Anchorage location and spacing
> Above dorsal D-ring
20. STRUCTURE OF ANCHORAGE
Existing members of a
building structure are
often used as
anchorages
Existing members
usually support existing
loads
> Beam
> Purlin
> Truss
21. STRUCTURE OF ANCHORAGE
Addition of a fall arrest load may constitute a change
in use
Many jurisdictions require individuals to be
professional engineers who design and evaluate
physical structures
23. DESIGN LOADS
Conditional use
> Incorporates an administrative control that allows certain
members to be used as an anchorage under specific
conditions
> Applies to transient loads
> Combines two methods identified within the fall protection
hierarchy – fall arrest and administrative controls
> Existing building members used as conditional use
anchorages must be strictly controlled by a qualified person
24. SAFE ATTACHMENT LOCATIONS
Analysis may show that parts or all or none of the
beam may be used for anchorage
Requires strict control by a qualified person
Beams
3 Foot Max. Safe Zone
25. SAFE ATTACHMENT LOCATIONS
Panel points – the intersection of horizontal, vertical and
diagonal members (analysis required)
Individual members are usually not adequate
Trusses
26. FALL CLEARANCE
Rules of thumb
> Energy-absorbing lanyard – 13’
> Self-retracting lanyard – 7’
> Greater if determining
anchorage height
28. NUMBER OF USERS
Anchorage designed to support specific load
Load for a certified system is determined by the
qualified person
Based on number of users and maximum arresting
force of energy-absorbing lanyard
29. NUMBER OF USERS
Procedures should include:
> Maximum number of permitted simultaneous users
> Maximum user weight
> Maximum arrest force of energy-absorbing lanyard
Location of anchorage directly affects fall clearance
requirements
Clearances are calculated by qualified person
30. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
May affect longevity of permanently installed
equipment
Components installed in these conditions should be
fabricated from non-corrosive materials
Steelwork fabrications can be painted or galvanized
31. ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
Severe environmental conditions may warrant use of
stainless steel
Take precautions to avoid bi-metallic corrosion which
occurs when dissimilar metals are placed in contact
with each other
40. ACTION PLAN
1. Use the worksheet to evaluate 5-10 anchorages that you
know are used in your organization
• Temporary and permanent
2. Identify 2-3 systems where you can use the worksheet to
plan systems
41. SELECTING ANCHORAGE POINTS
LJB WEBINAR SERIES: MAY 2013
THOM KRAMER, P.E., C.S.P. – LJB INC.
(937) 259-5120; TKRAMER@LJBINC.COM
Editor's Notes
ChecklistNon-certifiedNon-certified per .2Certified per .2Certified per .6ProceduresSupervision of installationHierarchy of ControlClearancesNo clearance calculatedMiller slack used to calculate clearanceCP estimates clearanceClearance judged by QPSwing fallBridge crane or monorail used to minimize swing fall
Use roof examples – use case study for QP training (determine if it can be certified). Come up with 3 different types of solutions, and they can initially evaluate the solution and then some criteria to independently evaluate it. Need another example of an anchorage that wasn’t good (TEK). -
ChecklistNon-certifiedNon-certified per .2Certified per .2Certified per .6ProceduresSupervision of installationHierarchy of ControlClearancesNo clearance calculatedMiller slack used to calculate clearanceCP estimates clearanceClearance judged by QPSwing fallBridge crane or monorail used to minimize swing fall
Use roof examples – use case study for QP training (determine if it can be certified). Come up with 3 different types of solutions, and they can initially evaluate the solution and then some criteria to independently evaluate it. Need another example of an anchorage that wasn’t good (TEK). -
ChecklistNon-certifiedNon-certified per .2Certified per .2Certified per .6ProceduresSupervision of installationHierarchy of ControlClearancesNo clearance calculatedMiller slack used to calculate clearanceCP estimates clearanceClearance judged by QPSwing fallBridge crane or monorail used to minimize swing fall