This document outlines a week-long lesson plan on the scientific method for 7th grade life science students. The lesson includes 5 days of instruction using PowerPoint presentations, guided notes, worksheets, and a lab experiment. On day 1, students learn the steps of the scientific method. Day 2 focuses on aligning experiments with the steps. On day 3, students write hypotheses and procedures. A freshwater vs. saltwater lab is conducted on day 4. Day 5 involves a quiz and reviewing conclusions from the lab. The goal is for students to understand and apply the scientific method to develop hypotheses and communicate conclusions.
Observation of Io’s Resurfacing via Plume Deposition Using Ground-based Adapt...Sérgio Sacani
Since volcanic activity was first discovered on Io from Voyager images in 1979, changes
on Io’s surface have been monitored from both spacecraft and ground-based telescopes.
Here, we present the highest spatial resolution images of Io ever obtained from a groundbased telescope. These images, acquired by the SHARK-VIS instrument on the Large
Binocular Telescope, show evidence of a major resurfacing event on Io’s trailing hemisphere. When compared to the most recent spacecraft images, the SHARK-VIS images
show that a plume deposit from a powerful eruption at Pillan Patera has covered part
of the long-lived Pele plume deposit. Although this type of resurfacing event may be common on Io, few have been detected due to the rarity of spacecraft visits and the previously low spatial resolution available from Earth-based telescopes. The SHARK-VIS instrument ushers in a new era of high resolution imaging of Io’s surface using adaptive
optics at visible wavelengths.
Deep Behavioral Phenotyping in Systems Neuroscience for Functional Atlasing a...Ana Luísa Pinho
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) provides means to characterize brain activations in response to behavior. However, cognitive neuroscience has been limited to group-level effects referring to the performance of specific tasks. To obtain the functional profile of elementary cognitive mechanisms, the combination of brain responses to many tasks is required. Yet, to date, both structural atlases and parcellation-based activations do not fully account for cognitive function and still present several limitations. Further, they do not adapt overall to individual characteristics. In this talk, I will give an account of deep-behavioral phenotyping strategies, namely data-driven methods in large task-fMRI datasets, to optimize functional brain-data collection and improve inference of effects-of-interest related to mental processes. Key to this approach is the employment of fast multi-functional paradigms rich on features that can be well parametrized and, consequently, facilitate the creation of psycho-physiological constructs to be modelled with imaging data. Particular emphasis will be given to music stimuli when studying high-order cognitive mechanisms, due to their ecological nature and quality to enable complex behavior compounded by discrete entities. I will also discuss how deep-behavioral phenotyping and individualized models applied to neuroimaging data can better account for the subject-specific organization of domain-general cognitive systems in the human brain. Finally, the accumulation of functional brain signatures brings the possibility to clarify relationships among tasks and create a univocal link between brain systems and mental functions through: (1) the development of ontologies proposing an organization of cognitive processes; and (2) brain-network taxonomies describing functional specialization. To this end, tools to improve commensurability in cognitive science are necessary, such as public repositories, ontology-based platforms and automated meta-analysis tools. I will thus discuss some brain-atlasing resources currently under development, and their applicability in cognitive as well as clinical neuroscience.
ISI 2024: Application Form (Extended), Exam Date (Out), EligibilitySciAstra
The Indian Statistical Institute (ISI) has extended its application deadline for 2024 admissions to April 2. Known for its excellence in statistics and related fields, ISI offers a range of programs from Bachelor's to Junior Research Fellowships. The admission test is scheduled for May 12, 2024. Eligibility varies by program, generally requiring a background in Mathematics and English for undergraduate courses and specific degrees for postgraduate and research positions. Application fees are ₹1500 for male general category applicants and ₹1000 for females. Applications are open to Indian and OCI candidates.
hematic appreciation test is a psychological assessment tool used to measure an individual's appreciation and understanding of specific themes or topics. This test helps to evaluate an individual's ability to connect different ideas and concepts within a given theme, as well as their overall comprehension and interpretation skills. The results of the test can provide valuable insights into an individual's cognitive abilities, creativity, and critical thinking skills
The ability to recreate computational results with minimal effort and actionable metrics provides a solid foundation for scientific research and software development. When people can replicate an analysis at the touch of a button using open-source software, open data, and methods to assess and compare proposals, it significantly eases verification of results, engagement with a diverse range of contributors, and progress. However, we have yet to fully achieve this; there are still many sociotechnical frictions.
Inspired by David Donoho's vision, this talk aims to revisit the three crucial pillars of frictionless reproducibility (data sharing, code sharing, and competitive challenges) with the perspective of deep software variability.
Our observation is that multiple layers — hardware, operating systems, third-party libraries, software versions, input data, compile-time options, and parameters — are subject to variability that exacerbates frictions but is also essential for achieving robust, generalizable results and fostering innovation. I will first review the literature, providing evidence of how the complex variability interactions across these layers affect qualitative and quantitative software properties, thereby complicating the reproduction and replication of scientific studies in various fields.
I will then present some software engineering and AI techniques that can support the strategic exploration of variability spaces. These include the use of abstractions and models (e.g., feature models), sampling strategies (e.g., uniform, random), cost-effective measurements (e.g., incremental build of software configurations), and dimensionality reduction methods (e.g., transfer learning, feature selection, software debloating).
I will finally argue that deep variability is both the problem and solution of frictionless reproducibility, calling the software science community to develop new methods and tools to manage variability and foster reproducibility in software systems.
Exposé invité Journées Nationales du GDR GPL 2024
Comparing Evolved Extractive Text Summary Scores of Bidirectional Encoder Rep...University of Maribor
Slides from:
11th International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (IcETRAN), Niš, 3-6 June 2024
Track: Artificial Intelligence
https://www.etran.rs/2024/en/home-english/
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
Phenomics assisted breeding in crop improvementIshaGoswami9
As the population is increasing and will reach about 9 billion upto 2050. Also due to climate change, it is difficult to meet the food requirement of such a large population. Facing the challenges presented by resource shortages, climate
change, and increasing global population, crop yield and quality need to be improved in a sustainable way over the coming decades. Genetic improvement by breeding is the best way to increase crop productivity. With the rapid progression of functional
genomics, an increasing number of crop genomes have been sequenced and dozens of genes influencing key agronomic traits have been identified. However, current genome sequence information has not been adequately exploited for understanding
the complex characteristics of multiple gene, owing to a lack of crop phenotypic data. Efficient, automatic, and accurate technologies and platforms that can capture phenotypic data that can
be linked to genomics information for crop improvement at all growth stages have become as important as genotyping. Thus,
high-throughput phenotyping has become the major bottleneck restricting crop breeding. Plant phenomics has been defined as the high-throughput, accurate acquisition and analysis of multi-dimensional phenotypes
during crop growing stages at the organism level, including the cell, tissue, organ, individual plant, plot, and field levels. With the rapid development of novel sensors, imaging technology,
and analysis methods, numerous infrastructure platforms have been developed for phenotyping.
Travis Hills' Endeavors in Minnesota: Fostering Environmental and Economic Pr...Travis Hills MN
Travis Hills of Minnesota developed a method to convert waste into high-value dry fertilizer, significantly enriching soil quality. By providing farmers with a valuable resource derived from waste, Travis Hills helps enhance farm profitability while promoting environmental stewardship. Travis Hills' sustainable practices lead to cost savings and increased revenue for farmers by improving resource efficiency and reducing waste.
DERIVATION OF MODIFIED BERNOULLI EQUATION WITH VISCOUS EFFECTS AND TERMINAL V...Wasswaderrick3
In this book, we use conservation of energy techniques on a fluid element to derive the Modified Bernoulli equation of flow with viscous or friction effects. We derive the general equation of flow/ velocity and then from this we derive the Pouiselle flow equation, the transition flow equation and the turbulent flow equation. In the situations where there are no viscous effects , the equation reduces to the Bernoulli equation. From experimental results, we are able to include other terms in the Bernoulli equation. We also look at cases where pressure gradients exist. We use the Modified Bernoulli equation to derive equations of flow rate for pipes of different cross sectional areas connected together. We also extend our techniques of energy conservation to a sphere falling in a viscous medium under the effect of gravity. We demonstrate Stokes equation of terminal velocity and turbulent flow equation. We look at a way of calculating the time taken for a body to fall in a viscous medium. We also look at the general equation of terminal velocity.
ANAMOLOUS SECONDARY GROWTH IN DICOT ROOTS.pptxRASHMI M G
Abnormal or anomalous secondary growth in plants. It defines secondary growth as an increase in plant girth due to vascular cambium or cork cambium. Anomalous secondary growth does not follow the normal pattern of a single vascular cambium producing xylem internally and phloem externally.
The use of Nauplii and metanauplii artemia in aquaculture (brine shrimp).pptxMAGOTI ERNEST
Although Artemia has been known to man for centuries, its use as a food for the culture of larval organisms apparently began only in the 1930s, when several investigators found that it made an excellent food for newly hatched fish larvae (Litvinenko et al., 2023). As aquaculture developed in the 1960s and ‘70s, the use of Artemia also became more widespread, due both to its convenience and to its nutritional value for larval organisms (Arenas-Pardo et al., 2024). The fact that Artemia dormant cysts can be stored for long periods in cans, and then used as an off-the-shelf food requiring only 24 h of incubation makes them the most convenient, least labor-intensive, live food available for aquaculture (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021). The nutritional value of Artemia, especially for marine organisms, is not constant, but varies both geographically and temporally. During the last decade, however, both the causes of Artemia nutritional variability and methods to improve poorquality Artemia have been identified (Loufi et al., 2024).
Brine shrimp (Artemia spp.) are used in marine aquaculture worldwide. Annually, more than 2,000 metric tons of dry cysts are used for cultivation of fish, crustacean, and shellfish larva. Brine shrimp are important to aquaculture because newly hatched brine shrimp nauplii (larvae) provide a food source for many fish fry (Mozanzadeh et al., 2021). Culture and harvesting of brine shrimp eggs represents another aspect of the aquaculture industry. Nauplii and metanauplii of Artemia, commonly known as brine shrimp, play a crucial role in aquaculture due to their nutritional value and suitability as live feed for many aquatic species, particularly in larval stages (Sorgeloos & Roubach, 2021).
Professional air quality monitoring systems provide immediate, on-site data for analysis, compliance, and decision-making.
Monitor common gases, weather parameters, particulates.
1. Page 1 of 19
GradeLevel/Course:
Grade 7 Life Science
Lesson/Unit Plan Name:
Scientific Method Mania
Rationale/Lesson Abstract:
SWBAT explain the scientific method/scientific inquiry. SWBAT to develop a hypothesis and
clearly and scientifically communicate their conclusion.
Timeframe:
One week
Common Core Standard(s):
7. Scientific progress is made by asking meaningful questions and conducting careful
investigations. As a basis for understanding this concept and addressing the content in
the other three strands, students should develop their own questions and perform
investigations. Students will:
c. Communicate the logical connection among hypotheses, science concepts, tests
conducted, data collected, and conclusions drawn from the scientific evidence.
e. Communicate the steps and results from an investigation in written reports and oral
presentations.
2. Page 2 of 19
Instructional Resources/Materials:
See Scientific Method Week Overview Document below in Activity/Lesson section
Day 1 – PowerPoint, guided notes worksheet and homework worksheet
Day 2 – PowerPoint, guided notes chart, and homework worksheet
Day 3 – Peanut Butter, Jelly, Bread, and knife for demo; homework worksheet
Day 4 – Water, salt, timer, ice cube, and cups for Fresh/Salt water lab; homework worksheet
Day 5 – PowerPoint quiz, student lab books to review Fresh/Salt water lab
Activity/Lesson:
See Scientific Method Week Overview on page 3 for detailed lesson plans
Day 1 – SWBAT write the steps of the scientific method. Teacher will present notes via
PowerPoint (see PowerPoint Day 1). Students follow along with guided notes worksheet (see
Guided Notes Day 1). Students begin homework worksheet (see Homework Worksheet Day 1)
in class and complete for homework.
Day 2 – SWBAT describe the steps of the scientific method and align the six steps in method.
Students follow along with teacher’s PowerPoint with guided notes sheet (see Guided Notes
Day 2). In small groups, students complete vocabulary chart. Teacher continues to assess
students’ learning. Students begin homework worksheet (see Homework Worksheet Day 2) in
class and complete for homework.
Day 3 – SWBAT write a “report” section for a lab report and construct a solid hypothesis.
Students instruct teacher on making a peanut butter and jelly sandwich while writing clear
steps in lab notebook (following the scientific method).
Day 4 – SWBAT to solve problems using the scientific method. Students work in lab groups to
complete Fresh vs. Salt Water Lab (see lab handouts below).
Day 5 – SWBAT clearly articulate evidence and state conclusion from Fresh/Salt Water Lab.
Teacher administers PowerPoint Scientific Method Quiz (see PowerPoint Quiz attached).
Students will review Fresh/Salt Water Lab within theirlab groups and present evidence to
class.
Assessment:
Teacher will use formal (I.E. lab report, quiz, science fair project) and informal assessment (I.E. thumbs
up/down, 1--‐5 scale [example: “On a scale from 1--‐5, how well do you understand steps for scientific
method?”], daily “check for understanding” oral questions, think--‐pair--‐share)
3. Page 3 of 19
SCIENTIFIC METHOD MANIA UNIT OVERVIEW – DETAILED LESSON PLANS
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
Standard 7.c, 7.e
Objective SWBAT write
the steps of
the scientific
method
SWBAT describe
the steps of the
scientific method
and align
experiments with 6
steps in method
SEBAT write a
“report” section for a
lab report and
construct a solid
hypotheses
SWBAT solve
problems using the
scientific method
SWBAT clearly articulate
evidence and conclusion
from science lab
Do Now Describe a
science
experiment
you have
done in your
kitchen at
home
Define using
textbook: 1.
Scientific inquiry 2.
Hypothesis 3. data
4. Scientific Inquiry
5. variables
6. control
7. manipulated
variables
8. responding
variables
9. Conclusion
Scientific Method Quiz
Intro to new
material
Steps – ppt
(attached)
Notes – PPT
(attached)
Have students write
out steps for making
Peanut Butter and Jelly
Sandwich while teacher
prepares an actual
PB&J sandwich
Fresh and Salt
Water Lab – See
lab print-out below
Review – no new
material
Group
practice
Guided notes
(day 1)
Fill out chart –
notes/experiment
Peanut butter and jelly
steps translated into
scientific report
Students work in
groups to complete
lab
Review lab from Day 4
with lab group -‐‐ present
evidenceto class
Check for
understanding
Teacher
assess by
thumbs
up/down
Teacher assess
with a 1-5 scale
Teachers assess with
question/answer
Teacher walks
around room to
observe each group
Independent
practice
Worksheet
#1
Worksheet #2 –
identifying parts
Wkst # 3
Homework Finish wkst
for
homework
Finish worksheet &
come up with an
idea
Finish wkst 3 Finish for hw
worksheet #4
Materials Make copies
and hole
punch
Peanut butter, jelly,
bread, knife, plate
Water,salt,
cups, ice cubes,
lab worksheet
4. Page 4 of 19
Guided Notes – Day 1
Name Period Date
Do Now
Objective
Scientific Method Notes
The 6 Steps of the Scientific Method
Step #1: Pose a .
What do you want to explore? Ask a question about it.
Choose something that can be answered with an .
Step #2: Form your .
What do you think the answer to your question or problem will be?
A hypothesis is an educated guess based on .
Your hypothesis must be very clear so you can it.
Step #3: Design an and test your .
Write the steps for how you will test your hypothesis.
List the you will need.
Your procedure must be so detailed that another scientist could
.
5. Page 5 of 19
Step #4: Collect and Interpret .
Get your materials, follow your , and make observations.
While taking data, you should record and
observations.
Make , charts, or using the data.
Step #5: Draw .
In the conclusion, scientists answer the that the experiment
asked.
Look at your and decide what it tells you about your hypothesis.
Summarize your data.
Step #6: Communicate your .
What happened? Was it what you expected? Why or why not?
your results with others.
6. Page 6 of 19
DAY 2 – Guided notes/chart
Name Period Date
Do Now
Objective
SCIENTIFIC METHOD
Definition Example
1. Pose a question
2. Form a hypothesis
3.Design an experiment
4. Collect data
7. Page 7 of 19
5. Make a conclusion
6. Communicate results
Good Scientific Method Questions
A good scientific question can be answered by doing an ______________________ _.
Which of the following are good scientific method questions?
Put a YES next to questions that are good scientific method questions and a NO next to those that are
not.
What is the best color in the world?
Will using or not using fertilizer help a plant grow better?
Do athletes run faster with or without vitamins?
How fast can humans run?
8. Page 8 of 19
Rewrite the 2 questions above that were not good scientific method questions so that they are good
scientific method questions.
a)
b)
Create 2 examples of your own good scientific method questions.
a)
b)
9. Page 9 of 19
Scientific method homework– Day 3
Name Period Date
Do Now
Objective
1. What is the scientific method?
2. Write the 6 steps of the scientific method in order.
Today we are going to practice the first three steps of the scientific method. For each situation
below, please state a problem and form a hypothesis.
***The problem always ends in a question mark (?) and the hypothesis always ends in a period
(.).
Example: Observation: Juan is trying to grow plants.
Problem: Will Juan’s plants grow better if he puts them in the sun?
Hypothesis: If Juan puts his plants in the sun, then they will grow better.
3. Observation: Students are late to class.
Problem:
Hypothesis:
10. Page 10 of 19
4. Observation: Someone is smoking a cigarette.
Problem:
Hypothesis:
5. Observation: Students are always tired in my first period class.
Problem:
Hypothesis:
6. Observation: Samantha is trying to grow flowers.
Problem:
Hypothesis:
Now fill in your OWN observations:
7. Observation:
Problem:
Hypothesis:
8. Observation:
Problem:
Hypothesis:
9. Observation:
Problem:
Hypothesis:
11. Page 11 of 19
10. It is important to learn how to a good “methods” section in a
report.
This is the section where you tell your audience how you completed your
and what you used.
11. Today we wrote the steps and materials needed to build a PB & J sandwich. Now it is your
turn, please write all materials and steps needed to prepare a bowl of cereal. Be exact, pretend
like you are writing to someone who has NEVER made milk and cereal before.
MATERIALS:
PROCEDURE:
12. Page 12 of 19
Group’s Name: ____________________________Section: ________________ Score: __________________
Fresh vs. Salt Water Lab
The scientific method involves 5 steps: question, hypothesis, experiment, data,
and conclusion. Any discovery made in science involves these steps where a
scientist notices something, asks why or how that happens, and comes up with
a reasonable guess to answer it. However, a guess alone does not prove
anything. In order to answer his question, he must perform an experiment and
look at the data. Only then he will know if his reasonable guess was correct or
incorrect. In this lab, you will follow the 6 steps of the scientific method to answer the question,
“Does ice melt faster in salt or fresh water?
Step 1: Question (1 point)
Step 2: Hypothesis (3 points)
If I test to see___________________________________________________________________
then I predict
because
Step 3: Experiment (Materials) (2 points)
□ Cups:
□ Water:
□ Timer
Step 3: Experiment (steps)
1. Work in groups of 4. Only the material leader can get the materials for the group.
2. Pour fresh water in the fresh water cup.
3. Pour salt water in the salt water cup.
4. Class timer will start.
5. Put 2 cubes of ice in each cup when the teacher gives the signal.
6. Record the time it takes for ice to melt in salt water in the data table.
7. Record the time it takes for ice to melt in fresh water in the data table.
8. Include units!! (time in minutes or seconds)
13. Page 13 of 19
Fresh Water Salt Water
Step 4: Data Analysis (4 points)
Salt water Fresh water
Time
Step 4: Data Analysis (Graphing) (3 points)
14. Page 14 of 19
Step 5: Conclusion.(7 points)
1. How long did it take ice to melt in fresh water?
2. How long did it take ice to melt in salt water? ____________________
3. Looking at your data, was your hypothesis correct or incorrect?
4. Explain in 2--‐3 COMPLETE SENTENCES about what happened in your experiment. Be detailed.
15. Page 15 of 19
Scientific Method Homework
Name: Period:
List the steps of the Scientific Method In the space provided.
Date
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
In the space provided, use the Scientific Method to solve the following problems. Follow
the step-by-step process you wrote above to find a solution. Write your answer in
PARAGRAPH FORM and be sure to write in COMPLETE SENTENCES.
Observation 1: One morning you wake up and discover that your radio no
longer works.
16. Page 16 of 19
Observation 2: You take all of your books home from school and promptly finish
your homework. The next morning you wake up and cannot find your bag with
your books in it. Your brother has a backpack that looks very similar to yours.
17. Page 17 of 19
Scientific Method Review Sheet
Name Period Date
Do Now
Objective
The Scientific Method
How do scientists make discoveries? They follow the five steps of the
scientific method:
1. Make observations. Check out the world around you to find out
everything you can about a problem you want to solve.
2. Form a hypothesis, or predict what you think will happen when
you do the experiment.
3. Perform experiments, or tests, that will prove your hypothesis is
right or wrong.
4. Collect results. What happened when you did your experiment?
What information can you collect?
5. Draw conclusions, or answers, about your hypothesis by taking a
good look at your results.
18. Page 18 of 19
Scientific Method Review – Student version
Name: Date:
“The Scientific Method” Questions
1. In the scientific method, before conducting any experiments, it is necessary to
a. make discoveries.
b. draw conclusions.
c. form a hypothesis.
d. collect results.
2. If the hypothesis is proved wrong, the next step would be to create a new hypothesis and
follow steps of the scientific method steps again. What step would be next?
a. collect more results.
b. draw conclusions.
c. conduct more experiments.
d. do nothing, you are done.
3. An experiment that is most appropriate to prove the hypothesis that it rains more in April
than in March would be to
a. count how many days it rains in April.
b. measure the growth of flowers during the month of March.
c. count the number of sunny days in March and April.
d. collect and measure the amount of rain in March and in April.
4. The step just before deciding whether your hypothesis is correct or incorrect would be to
a. make a prediction.
b. perform an experiment.
c. collect results.
d. make observations.
5. What question about the world around you could be answered using the scientific
method? Explain how you could use the scientific method to answer your question.
_______________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
19. Page 19 of 19
Scientific Method Review Document – Answer Sheet
Name: Date:
“The Scientific Method” Answer Sheet
Seq. 1. In the scientific method, before conducting any experiments, it is necessary to
a. make discoveries.
b. draw conclusions.
c. form a hypothesis.
d. collect results.
Seq. 2. If the hypothesis is proved wrong, the next step would be to create a new hypothesis
and follow the steps of the scientific method again. What step would be next?
a. collect more results.
b. draw conclusions.
c. conduct more experiments.
d. do nothing, you are done.
DC 3. An experiment that is most appropriate to prove the hypothesis that it rains more in
April than in March would be to
a. count how many days it rains in April.
b. measure the growth of flowers during the month of March.
c. count the number of sunny days in March and April.
d. collect and measure the amount of rain in March and in April.
Seq. 4. The step just before deciding whether your hypothesis is correct or incorrect would be
to
a. make a prediction.
b. perform an experiment.
c. collect results.
d. make observations.
DC 5. What question about the world around you could be answered using the scientific
method? Explain how you could use the scientific method to answer your question.
Answers will vary but should follow the scientific method.