Science Fair Student Slides 20xx-20xx
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
2 likes•1,023 views
This document appears to be a template for a student science fair project. It includes sections for the project title, student number, category, teacher, question, materials, procedure, research findings in bullet points, hypothesis, variables including a controlled variable and independent variable, data and observations in graph or table form, conclusion, works cited, and a judging sheet. The judging sheet lists criteria such as having a title page, question, materials, procedure, research findings, variables identified, hypothesis, data, conclusion, and works cited, as well as bonuses for technical merit and creativity. Judges are directed to score projects on a scale of 1 to 5 in each category.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Lab Report Format
The document outlines the proper format for a lab report, including a cover page with student and experiment details, and numbered pages for the problem, hypothesis, materials, procedure, data, and conclusion. The problem and hypothesis are stated on the first two pages, with the problem posing the experiment's question and the hypothesis predicting the answer. The following pages cover the materials used, step-by-step procedure, results displayed in tables and graphs, and a concluding paragraph analyzing whether the data supports or disproves the hypothesis and what was learned.
Science fair project
This science fair project document template provides guidelines for students to describe their science experiment, including sections for the problem statement, project overview, research background, variables, hypothesis, materials, procedures, data collection, results, and conclusion. The student is asked to provide details about their experiment testing how a controlled independent variable affects a dependent variable.
Sciencefairpowerpoint2011 110321200644-phpapp02
The document provides requirements and guidelines for a science fair project. It outlines that students must submit: 1) a logbook with dated records of their work, 2) a display board summarizing their project, 3) an abstract, and 4) any models or visual aids. The logbook must be organized into sections including background research, scientific method, raw data, findings and conclusions. The display board should visually showcase the title, problem, hypothesis, procedures, data and conclusions. Important due dates for submitting project components are also provided.
Sc. fair written report (part i)
The document provides guidance for students writing science fair reports, separating requirements into competitive and non-competitive sections. It outlines the specific sections and content needed for the written report, including purpose, problem, research, hypothesis, subjects, variables, controls, materials, and procedures. Students are instructed to write each section on its own page with the appropriate heading. Competitive reports must be typed while non-competitive can be handwritten, and all must be added to a science fair binder.
Sc. fair written report (exp. design)
This document provides guidelines for students completing a science fair written report. It outlines the 14 required sections for the report and examples of content for each section. For competitive students, reports must be typed using standard font sizes and formatting. Sections include the purpose of the study, the problem being investigated, a research paper, hypothesis, subjects, variables, controls, materials, procedures, graphs of data, results, conclusion, applications, and recommendations. Following these guidelines will help students complete a full written report for their science fair project.
Writing up your coursework
The document provides guidance to students on completing sections of a written project report on memory. It outlines the requirements and deadlines for the Introduction, Method, and Conclusion sections. For the Introduction, it describes including background research on memory models and relating previous studies. The Method section must describe the design, participants, materials, and procedures in enough detail to replicate the study. It also provides details on what to include for the hypothesis, independent and dependent variables, sampling method, materials, procedure, and controlling for confounding variables. The deadline for the final coursework is March 1st.
Types of instrument
This document discusses research instruments and data collection methods. It describes common instruments like tests, questionnaires, and interviews that are used to gather data. Questionnaires are one of the most widely used tools, and there are two main types: closed-form questionnaires with predetermined answers and open-form questionnaires with open-ended questions. The document provides guidelines for constructing effective questionnaires, such as using clear language, asking single-purpose questions, and avoiding biases. It also notes advantages and disadvantages of using questionnaires for data collection.
Science Fair Project Presentation
This document outlines the sections and content needed for a science fair project. The project asks a question about a problem and presents a hypothesis. Experiments are designed with controlled, independent, and dependent variables. Procedures are followed and observations are recorded, then analyzed to conclude whether the data supports the original hypothesis. Sources are cited.
Recommended
Lab Report Format
The document outlines the proper format for a lab report, including a cover page with student and experiment details, and numbered pages for the problem, hypothesis, materials, procedure, data, and conclusion. The problem and hypothesis are stated on the first two pages, with the problem posing the experiment's question and the hypothesis predicting the answer. The following pages cover the materials used, step-by-step procedure, results displayed in tables and graphs, and a concluding paragraph analyzing whether the data supports or disproves the hypothesis and what was learned.
Science fair project
This science fair project document template provides guidelines for students to describe their science experiment, including sections for the problem statement, project overview, research background, variables, hypothesis, materials, procedures, data collection, results, and conclusion. The student is asked to provide details about their experiment testing how a controlled independent variable affects a dependent variable.
Sciencefairpowerpoint2011 110321200644-phpapp02
The document provides requirements and guidelines for a science fair project. It outlines that students must submit: 1) a logbook with dated records of their work, 2) a display board summarizing their project, 3) an abstract, and 4) any models or visual aids. The logbook must be organized into sections including background research, scientific method, raw data, findings and conclusions. The display board should visually showcase the title, problem, hypothesis, procedures, data and conclusions. Important due dates for submitting project components are also provided.
Sc. fair written report (part i)
The document provides guidance for students writing science fair reports, separating requirements into competitive and non-competitive sections. It outlines the specific sections and content needed for the written report, including purpose, problem, research, hypothesis, subjects, variables, controls, materials, and procedures. Students are instructed to write each section on its own page with the appropriate heading. Competitive reports must be typed while non-competitive can be handwritten, and all must be added to a science fair binder.
Sc. fair written report (exp. design)
This document provides guidelines for students completing a science fair written report. It outlines the 14 required sections for the report and examples of content for each section. For competitive students, reports must be typed using standard font sizes and formatting. Sections include the purpose of the study, the problem being investigated, a research paper, hypothesis, subjects, variables, controls, materials, procedures, graphs of data, results, conclusion, applications, and recommendations. Following these guidelines will help students complete a full written report for their science fair project.
Writing up your coursework
The document provides guidance to students on completing sections of a written project report on memory. It outlines the requirements and deadlines for the Introduction, Method, and Conclusion sections. For the Introduction, it describes including background research on memory models and relating previous studies. The Method section must describe the design, participants, materials, and procedures in enough detail to replicate the study. It also provides details on what to include for the hypothesis, independent and dependent variables, sampling method, materials, procedure, and controlling for confounding variables. The deadline for the final coursework is March 1st.
Types of instrument
This document discusses research instruments and data collection methods. It describes common instruments like tests, questionnaires, and interviews that are used to gather data. Questionnaires are one of the most widely used tools, and there are two main types: closed-form questionnaires with predetermined answers and open-form questionnaires with open-ended questions. The document provides guidelines for constructing effective questionnaires, such as using clear language, asking single-purpose questions, and avoiding biases. It also notes advantages and disadvantages of using questionnaires for data collection.
Science Fair Project Presentation
This document outlines the sections and content needed for a science fair project. The project asks a question about a problem and presents a hypothesis. Experiments are designed with controlled, independent, and dependent variables. Procedures are followed and observations are recorded, then analyzed to conclude whether the data supports the original hypothesis. Sources are cited.
Ch. 9 generating and testing hypotheses
This document discusses generating and testing hypotheses. It explains that hypotheses can be approached inductively by drawing conclusions from known information, or deductively by making predictions using general rules. Six types of tasks that employ hypotheses are described: system analysis, problem solving, historical investigation, invention, experimental inquiry, and decision making. The document emphasizes that teachers should provide support for students to clearly explain their hypotheses and conclusions, such as templates, sentence stems, rubrics, and opportunities to present their thinking to others.
Week4 Ensure Analysis Is Accurate And Complete
This document discusses analyzing information gathered to ensure accuracy and completeness. It explains that data should be analyzed both during and after collection. When analyzing collected data, it is important to organize the data into meaningful categories, document it in tables, summarize it in paragraphs, and represent it visually using charts. Examples of representing survey results as a pie chart and column graph are provided.
Qcl 14-v3 [cause-effect-diagram]-[banasthali university]_[devanshi agarwal] (1)
This document discusses cause and effect analysis and its four steps. It provides an example of using cause and effect analysis to identify the root causes of poor student placement. The major factors identified include students, college administration, and companies. Possible causes are then mapped relating to each factor, such as lack of interest, ineffective faculty, poor hospitality, and no vacancies. The document concludes by summarizing that students must focus on practical learning, colleges must prioritize placements, and companies should only recruit students they intend to employ.
STAAR online
Presentation I made about the online STAAR. Includes some research based on our students' preferences and results as well as information regarding the PNPs available on the online assessment.
Ap biology lab notebook
- The document outlines the requirements for AP Biology lab notebooks including formatting, content, and structure.
- Key requirements include using pencil, including identifying information on the cover, numbering pages, using third person, skipping lines between sections, and following specific formats for confirmation and inquiry labs.
- Sections must include the title, date, pre-lab questions, objective, materials, procedure, data, analysis, conclusion, and be written in a specific format and order.
Science Fair Project
This science fair project examines the question of how a particular independent variable affects a dependent variable. It outlines the controlled variables, hypothesis, materials used, and procedure for conducting an experiment. Data from the experiment is presented in a table or graph, and the conclusion discusses whether the results supported the initial hypothesis.
Science Fair Project
This science fair project explores a question by conducting an experiment with controlled variables, an independent variable that is changed, and a dependent variable that is measured. The student hypothesized the results of the experiment before conducting detailed procedures using listed materials. Data was organized and observations were made, with the conclusion summarizing that the results did or did not support the initial hypothesis.
How to do a science investigatory project
This document provides guidance for students on employing the scientific method and explaining a science project. It outlines the key steps of the scientific method including formulating a question, conducting research to form a hypothesis, experimentation through repeated trials, analyzing results, and drawing a conclusion. The document also notes that projects should be evaluated based on a research paper, oral presentation, and display poster. It emphasizes that both successful and failed experiments can provide valuable scientific insights.
ADP L6 Results
Part 6 of a series of lessons on writing an academic paper. Presented in English to graduate students at Kansai University, Osaka, Japan.
Survey Techniques
The document provides guidance on best practices for designing effective surveys. It discusses including open-ended and closed-ended questions, organizing the survey into sections, pilot testing questions, ensuring clear and unbiased wording, and remembering to keep the survey brief and easy for respondents to complete. Special attention should be given to question formatting, response options, and filtering questions to target the appropriate audience.
Coursework Data Interpretation
The document provides guidance on summarizing data from field work and investigations. It outlines three levels of summary: a brief description of results (Level 1), a good description of results that gives meaning and some conclusions (Level 2), and a detailed description with clear reasons for results and conclusions that link back to original ideas (Level 3). Past examiners noted the best investigations used a variety of techniques and clearly described, explained data, and identified links between data to draw sound conclusions connected to the original topic. Conclusions should return to key ideas, use useful data to answer questions, evaluate hypotheses, summarize main points, and link the investigation back to examples.
Likert scale
1. The Likert scale is a psychometric scale commonly used in survey research that employs questionnaires with symmetric agree-disagree response options that indicate the intensity of respondents' feelings towards a statement.
2. A typical 5-point Likert item provides 5 response levels ranging from "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree" to capture the intensity of respondents' feelings.
3. Likert scale responses can be analyzed individually as ordinal data or summed to treat them as interval data, and different statistical tests can then be used depending on the analysis method.
Act Writing At Eisenhower
This document provides information and guidance for scoring the writing portion of the Michigan Merit Exam (MME) using the ACT writing rubric. It discusses the components that contribute to the MME writing score, describes the ACT writing prompt and rubric, and explains how to analyze student responses using anchor papers and assign scores from 1 to 6. Scorers are trained to evaluate student essays based on attributes such as position, complexity, organization, and language use to effectively assess writing ability.
Fs5 ep5
The document discusses the student's field study on portfolios used for learner assessment. It includes a checklist for classifying different portfolio types the student examined, which identified documentation, process, and showcase portfolios. The student observed various portfolios and analyzed their elements and contents. The student reflected on whether portfolios improve learning assessment and if the effort required is justified by learning improvements.
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
This document provides guidance on developing assessment items and scoring rubrics. It outlines the procedural steps for creating multiple choice, short answer, extended answer, and extended performance assessment items. It includes templates for item frameworks, quality assurance checklists for items and scoring, and guidance on developing scoring keys and rubrics. The goal is to ensure assessments are well-designed and aligned to content standards.
Science Fair Training Slides
This document provides instructions for students participating in a science fair. It outlines the required elements for the display board [1] and encourages parents to assist their children while maintaining a supportive role [2]. Students are expected to follow a specific order for the scientific method slides and can make their presentations unique [3]. The science fair is intended to be fun and help prepare students for standardized testing [4].
Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14
The document provides steps for developing items and tasks for a multiple choice, short answer, extended answer, and extended performance assessment. It includes frameworks and checklists for multiple choice items, short answer tasks, scoring rubrics, administration guidelines, and test forms. The frameworks provide examples of item and task structures, while the checklists outline criteria for ensuring quality items, scoring, administration procedures, and test form design.
Student Voice
The document outlines a three-step process for teachers and students at Audenried High School to analyze benchmark data:
1) Teachers access benchmark data through the school district website and create PDFs of class and student performance.
2) Teachers analyze the data to inform instruction by identifying class strengths and weaknesses.
3) Students take ownership of their learning by examining their own performance, setting goals, and creating plans to improve for the next benchmark. Students graph their results over time and store materials in folders.
Episode 8
This document provides an overview of a learning episode on the K-12 grading system implemented in the Philippines. It includes the intended outcomes, performance criteria, and learning activities for the episode. The key points are:
- The K-12 grading system weights written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments differently depending on the subject and grade level. It aims to assess higher-order cognitive skills.
- Learning activities include interviewing a resource teacher and students about their experiences with the new system and doing a sample grade computation.
- The analysis examines teacher and student perspectives on the system and its emphasis on assessment of knowledge, skills, and values. Reflections consider whether grades truly matter and how core values are
Field study 5 - 5 Format
The document discusses the student's field study examining learners' portfolios. The student observed various types of portfolios, including documentation, process, and showcase portfolios. The student analyzed the portfolios, noting the most commonly used type and whether the sample portfolios contained standard elements like cover letters, tables of contents, and reflections. The student reflected on whether portfolio assessment improves learning and the impact of missing elements on the assessment process.
Chapter 11 apt 501
The document discusses developing assessment instruments, focusing on revising instruction based on formative evaluation data. It describes methods for summarizing evaluation data and identifying weaknesses in materials to suggest revisions. The revision process aims to improve instructional materials, strategies, and achievement of learners based on results from formative assessments.
Questionnaire slides
This document outlines steps for developing an effective questionnaire, including determining research questions, drafting question items, and various question formats like fill-in-the-blank, multiple choice, comment-on, list, Likert scales, and rank. Well-constructed questionnaires can efficiently gather both quantitative and qualitative data for research in a logical way that lends itself to organized analysis. Developing a questionnaire requires careful thought but produces a satisfying end product.
More Related Content
What's hot
Ch. 9 generating and testing hypotheses
This document discusses generating and testing hypotheses. It explains that hypotheses can be approached inductively by drawing conclusions from known information, or deductively by making predictions using general rules. Six types of tasks that employ hypotheses are described: system analysis, problem solving, historical investigation, invention, experimental inquiry, and decision making. The document emphasizes that teachers should provide support for students to clearly explain their hypotheses and conclusions, such as templates, sentence stems, rubrics, and opportunities to present their thinking to others.
Week4 Ensure Analysis Is Accurate And Complete
This document discusses analyzing information gathered to ensure accuracy and completeness. It explains that data should be analyzed both during and after collection. When analyzing collected data, it is important to organize the data into meaningful categories, document it in tables, summarize it in paragraphs, and represent it visually using charts. Examples of representing survey results as a pie chart and column graph are provided.
Qcl 14-v3 [cause-effect-diagram]-[banasthali university]_[devanshi agarwal] (1)
This document discusses cause and effect analysis and its four steps. It provides an example of using cause and effect analysis to identify the root causes of poor student placement. The major factors identified include students, college administration, and companies. Possible causes are then mapped relating to each factor, such as lack of interest, ineffective faculty, poor hospitality, and no vacancies. The document concludes by summarizing that students must focus on practical learning, colleges must prioritize placements, and companies should only recruit students they intend to employ.
STAAR online
Presentation I made about the online STAAR. Includes some research based on our students' preferences and results as well as information regarding the PNPs available on the online assessment.
Ap biology lab notebook
- The document outlines the requirements for AP Biology lab notebooks including formatting, content, and structure.
- Key requirements include using pencil, including identifying information on the cover, numbering pages, using third person, skipping lines between sections, and following specific formats for confirmation and inquiry labs.
- Sections must include the title, date, pre-lab questions, objective, materials, procedure, data, analysis, conclusion, and be written in a specific format and order.
Science Fair Project
This science fair project examines the question of how a particular independent variable affects a dependent variable. It outlines the controlled variables, hypothesis, materials used, and procedure for conducting an experiment. Data from the experiment is presented in a table or graph, and the conclusion discusses whether the results supported the initial hypothesis.
Science Fair Project
This science fair project explores a question by conducting an experiment with controlled variables, an independent variable that is changed, and a dependent variable that is measured. The student hypothesized the results of the experiment before conducting detailed procedures using listed materials. Data was organized and observations were made, with the conclusion summarizing that the results did or did not support the initial hypothesis.
How to do a science investigatory project
This document provides guidance for students on employing the scientific method and explaining a science project. It outlines the key steps of the scientific method including formulating a question, conducting research to form a hypothesis, experimentation through repeated trials, analyzing results, and drawing a conclusion. The document also notes that projects should be evaluated based on a research paper, oral presentation, and display poster. It emphasizes that both successful and failed experiments can provide valuable scientific insights.
ADP L6 Results
Part 6 of a series of lessons on writing an academic paper. Presented in English to graduate students at Kansai University, Osaka, Japan.
Survey Techniques
The document provides guidance on best practices for designing effective surveys. It discusses including open-ended and closed-ended questions, organizing the survey into sections, pilot testing questions, ensuring clear and unbiased wording, and remembering to keep the survey brief and easy for respondents to complete. Special attention should be given to question formatting, response options, and filtering questions to target the appropriate audience.
Coursework Data Interpretation
The document provides guidance on summarizing data from field work and investigations. It outlines three levels of summary: a brief description of results (Level 1), a good description of results that gives meaning and some conclusions (Level 2), and a detailed description with clear reasons for results and conclusions that link back to original ideas (Level 3). Past examiners noted the best investigations used a variety of techniques and clearly described, explained data, and identified links between data to draw sound conclusions connected to the original topic. Conclusions should return to key ideas, use useful data to answer questions, evaluate hypotheses, summarize main points, and link the investigation back to examples.
Likert scale
1. The Likert scale is a psychometric scale commonly used in survey research that employs questionnaires with symmetric agree-disagree response options that indicate the intensity of respondents' feelings towards a statement.
2. A typical 5-point Likert item provides 5 response levels ranging from "Strongly disagree" to "Strongly agree" to capture the intensity of respondents' feelings.
3. Likert scale responses can be analyzed individually as ordinal data or summed to treat them as interval data, and different statistical tests can then be used depending on the analysis method.
Act Writing At Eisenhower
This document provides information and guidance for scoring the writing portion of the Michigan Merit Exam (MME) using the ACT writing rubric. It discusses the components that contribute to the MME writing score, describes the ACT writing prompt and rubric, and explains how to analyze student responses using anchor papers and assign scores from 1 to 6. Scorers are trained to evaluate student essays based on attributes such as position, complexity, organization, and language use to effectively assess writing ability.
What's hot (13)
Qcl 14-v3 [cause-effect-diagram]-[banasthali university]_[devanshi agarwal] (1)
Qcl 14-v3 [cause-effect-diagram]-[banasthali university]_[devanshi agarwal] (1)
Similar to Science Fair Student Slides 20xx-20xx
Fs5 ep5
The document discusses the student's field study on portfolios used for learner assessment. It includes a checklist for classifying different portfolio types the student examined, which identified documentation, process, and showcase portfolios. The student observed various portfolios and analyzed their elements and contents. The student reflected on whether portfolios improve learning assessment and if the effort required is justified by learning improvements.
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
This document provides guidance on developing assessment items and scoring rubrics. It outlines the procedural steps for creating multiple choice, short answer, extended answer, and extended performance assessment items. It includes templates for item frameworks, quality assurance checklists for items and scoring, and guidance on developing scoring keys and rubrics. The goal is to ensure assessments are well-designed and aligned to content standards.
Science Fair Training Slides
This document provides instructions for students participating in a science fair. It outlines the required elements for the display board [1] and encourages parents to assist their children while maintaining a supportive role [2]. Students are expected to follow a specific order for the scientific method slides and can make their presentations unique [3]. The science fair is intended to be fun and help prepare students for standardized testing [4].
Template #2 Building the Assessment-22JAN14
The document provides steps for developing items and tasks for a multiple choice, short answer, extended answer, and extended performance assessment. It includes frameworks and checklists for multiple choice items, short answer tasks, scoring rubrics, administration guidelines, and test forms. The frameworks provide examples of item and task structures, while the checklists outline criteria for ensuring quality items, scoring, administration procedures, and test form design.
Student Voice
The document outlines a three-step process for teachers and students at Audenried High School to analyze benchmark data:
1) Teachers access benchmark data through the school district website and create PDFs of class and student performance.
2) Teachers analyze the data to inform instruction by identifying class strengths and weaknesses.
3) Students take ownership of their learning by examining their own performance, setting goals, and creating plans to improve for the next benchmark. Students graph their results over time and store materials in folders.
Episode 8
This document provides an overview of a learning episode on the K-12 grading system implemented in the Philippines. It includes the intended outcomes, performance criteria, and learning activities for the episode. The key points are:
- The K-12 grading system weights written work, performance tasks, and quarterly assessments differently depending on the subject and grade level. It aims to assess higher-order cognitive skills.
- Learning activities include interviewing a resource teacher and students about their experiences with the new system and doing a sample grade computation.
- The analysis examines teacher and student perspectives on the system and its emphasis on assessment of knowledge, skills, and values. Reflections consider whether grades truly matter and how core values are
Field study 5 - 5 Format
The document discusses the student's field study examining learners' portfolios. The student observed various types of portfolios, including documentation, process, and showcase portfolios. The student analyzed the portfolios, noting the most commonly used type and whether the sample portfolios contained standard elements like cover letters, tables of contents, and reflections. The student reflected on whether portfolio assessment improves learning and the impact of missing elements on the assessment process.
Chapter 11 apt 501
The document discusses developing assessment instruments, focusing on revising instruction based on formative evaluation data. It describes methods for summarizing evaluation data and identifying weaknesses in materials to suggest revisions. The revision process aims to improve instructional materials, strategies, and achievement of learners based on results from formative assessments.
Questionnaire slides
This document outlines steps for developing an effective questionnaire, including determining research questions, drafting question items, and various question formats like fill-in-the-blank, multiple choice, comment-on, list, Likert scales, and rank. Well-constructed questionnaires can efficiently gather both quantitative and qualitative data for research in a logical way that lends itself to organized analysis. Developing a questionnaire requires careful thought but produces a satisfying end product.
Revising Instructional Materials
This document discusses revising instructional materials based on formative assessment data. It describes analyzing data from one-to-one trials and small group studies, including learner characteristics, responses, learning time, and post-test performance. Data should be summarized using tables showing item-by-item and learner-by-objective performance. Revisions are identified by examining objectives, pre/post-tests, instructional strategies, learning time, and implementation procedures. A template is provided to document proposed changes based on identified problems and evidence from the evaluation. The goal of revision is to improve areas where learners struggled and facilitate intellectual growth.
Treatment integrity DADD CEC
This document provides information on treatment integrity and how to ensure it. It defines treatment integrity as a multidimensional construct that involves both the content and process of how an intervention is implemented. It discusses assessing treatment integrity using methods that examine adherence, exposure, errors of omission/commission, and differentiation between programs. Barriers to integrity like intervention complexity and implementer characteristics are reviewed. Specific strategies are presented to measure integrity, including developing tools that rate operationalized intervention steps. The importance of participant responsiveness and intervention characteristics are also covered.
Science fair packet
This document provides instructions and forms for students completing a science fair project. It includes forms for students and parents to sign agreeing to the project and acknowledging the problem statement. It also includes a checklist for writing a testable problem statement and developing variables and a hypothesis. Finally, it provides a timeline for completing tasks like research, experimentation, and final project development. The key information is that students must develop a problem statement, variables, and hypothesis and follow a timeline to complete tasks like experimentation and data analysis to develop their final science fair project.
Apt chapter 11
This chapter discusses revising instructional materials based on formative evaluation data. Key points include:
1) Revision occurs after formative evaluation to improve accuracy and effectiveness of materials or instructional procedures.
2) Small group and field trial data provide more concrete information than one-on-one data to identify problems and suggest revisions.
3) Data from formative evaluations should be analyzed sequentially to identify issues and ensure objectives are being properly measured before revising materials.
Module 12 slideshare
This chapter discusses revising instructional materials based on data collected during formative evaluations, including summarizing data to identify weaknesses and suggesting revisions. The document provides guidance on analyzing data from one-to-one trials, small group trials, and field tests to evaluate learner performance and identify problems, such as with specific content, objectives, or time required to complete materials. Revisions are then made to address issues indicated by the evaluation data.
Thinking map how to set up an experiment new
This document provides guidance on using thinking maps to guide the scientific method process. It includes explanations and examples of how to:
1. Form a hypothesis using a cause and effect map to identify independent and dependent variables.
2. Create a procedure using a tree map to identify variables that will change, stay the same, and be measured in an experiment.
3. Structure an experiment, collect data, analyze results, and draw a conclusion on whether the original hypothesis was supported.
Spe 501 unit project assessments (1)
This document contains a unit project for a 4th grade math unit on multiplication and division. It includes an end of unit assessment, a performance based assessment, and a student self-assessment. The end of unit assessment contains multiple choice, short answer, and word problems to measure student learning. The performance assessment involves using a globe to measure distances between cities and converting those measurements to estimated mile distances. The student self-assessment asks students to rate their own understanding of key math skills from the unit. Accommodations for students with disabilities are also described.
Validation sheet
This document is a validation sheet for evaluating a test or questionnaire. It asks the validator to rate various aspects of the test on a scale from 1 to 5. The validator is asked to rate the clarity, presentation, suitability, adequacy of content, purpose attainment, objectivity, and appropriateness of the scale used in the test. Space is also provided for any remarks.
Review all of all things methods related student
This document provides a review of research methods concepts including:
1. Validity refers to the accuracy or truthfulness of research findings.
2. Practical issues that affect a researcher's choice of method include legal issues, ethics concerns, and problems accessing subjects.
3. Positivists see sociology as a science and prefer quantitative data, while the comparative method examines cause-and-effect relationships through thought experiments rather than practical experiments.
Phases in a project v 2
The document outlines the phases in designing an English language project, including choosing a topic, listing tasks, objectives, problems/situations, contents, and assessment criteria. It provides templates for planning the project, with sections on timing, competencies, learning outcomes, assessment, methodology, resources, and activities. The goal is to design a coherent project that motivates students and allows them to achieve the objectives through a final product or task.
Effective studyskills
For our learning and development lecture, we were given effective study skills to present as a project.
Similar to Science Fair Student Slides 20xx-20xx (20)
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
Template #2-Building the Assessment-June 2014-FINAL
Science Fair Student Slides 20xx-20xx
- 1. Project Title 2009-20010 Student Number Category Homeroom Teacher
- 2. Question
- 3. Materials
- 4. Procedure
- 5. Research Summarize your research here in five or more bullet points: –1 –2 –3 –4 –5
- 6. Hypothesis
- 7. Variables • Controlled variable: • Independent variable:
- 8. Data/Observations • Graph goes here.
- 9. Conclusion
- 10. Works Cited List in Alphabetical Order
- 11. Judging Sheet ***Check to make sure that you have everything needed from this list. *** Judges should score projects within a range of 1 to 5. Consider a 1 to be very low, a 2 is close to meeting the expectation, 3 should reflect that the student did what was expected. A 4 will be above average with a 5 being a superior rating. If possible, it will be appreciated if scores are totaled. 1. Title Page includes Number & Tchr.___________________ 2. Question_________________ 3. Materials _________________________________________ 4. Procedure- detailed steps of experiment__________________ 5. Research (Must have 5 facts)__________________________ 6. Variables _________________________________________ 1. Controlled variable- is the step/material that stays the same Project Number 2. Independent variable- is the step/material that changes. 7. Hypothesis –What student thinks will happen______________ ___________________ 8. Data/Observations – In graph or table form________________ 9. Conclusion- What they discovered__ _____________________ Project Title 10. Works Cited- Where information was found ________________ 11. Neat -Board has slides displayed with construction paper backing ______________________ and is neatly arranged__________________________________ 12. Technical (Bonus Points)_______________________________ Judge Number 13. Creative-(Bonus Points)_________________________________ ____________________ Total ____________