The document discusses Douglas McGregor's Theory X and Theory Y management philosophies. Theory X assumes employees dislike work and need to be closely managed and controlled. Theory Y assumes employees can exercise self-direction and self-control towards organizational objectives. The document also discusses how Theory X leads to rigid hierarchies while Theory Y encourages participation, responsibility and trust in employees. Finally, it introduces Theory Z which emphasizes Japanese-style management focusing on job security, group decision-making and concern for employees' well-being.
X and Y are about the human motivational theory developed by Douglas McGregor. it is about understanding your assumptions about employees motivation can help you learn to manage more effectively.
HUman Relation Theory @ X Theory, Y Theory, Mayo Theorykumar alok
Human Relation Theory
Theory X & Theory Y
Mayo Theory
Maslow's need of motivation.
The detailed content for the Human Relation Theory --https://brakfoundation.blogspot.com/2020/12/human-relation-theory.html
Theory X and Theory Y are theories of human work motivation and management. They were created by Douglas McGregor while he was working at the MIT Sloan School of Management in the 1950s, and developed further in the 1960s.
X and Y are about the human motivational theory developed by Douglas McGregor. it is about understanding your assumptions about employees motivation can help you learn to manage more effectively.
HUman Relation Theory @ X Theory, Y Theory, Mayo Theorykumar alok
Human Relation Theory
Theory X & Theory Y
Mayo Theory
Maslow's need of motivation.
The detailed content for the Human Relation Theory --https://brakfoundation.blogspot.com/2020/12/human-relation-theory.html
Theory X and Theory Y are theories of human work motivation and management. They were created by Douglas McGregor while he was working at the MIT Sloan School of Management in the 1950s, and developed further in the 1960s.
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxEduSkills OECD
Francesca Gottschalk from the OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation presents at the Ask an Expert Webinar: How can education support child empowerment?
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
The French Revolution, which began in 1789, was a period of radical social and political upheaval in France. It marked the decline of absolute monarchies, the rise of secular and democratic republics, and the eventual rise of Napoleon Bonaparte. This revolutionary period is crucial in understanding the transition from feudalism to modernity in Europe.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2. Douglas McGregor studied the attitudes people have
towards work and in his book, "The Human Side
of Enterprise" published in 1960 revealed certain
assumptions (beliefs) people (workers) have towards
work.
He categorized these assumptions into two groups which
he called Theory X and Theory Y.
These are regarded as two types of management
philosophies which guide their actions.
Generally, Theory X assumes that people are lazy and will
avoid work whenever possible.
Theory Y, on the other hand, assumes that people are
creative and enjoy work.
3. Theory X = the classical school of management thought, as
suggested by adherents of Taylorism.
Theory X basically holds the belief that people do not like
work and that some kind of direct pressure and control must
be exerted to get them to work effectively.
These people require a rigidly managed environment, usually
requiring threats of disciplinary action as a primary source of
motivation.
It is also held that employees will only respond to monetary
rewards as an incentive to perform above the level of that
which is expected.
From a management point of view, autocratic (Theory X)
managers like to retain most of their authority.
They make decisions on their own and inform the workers,
assuming that they will carry out the instructions.
4. 1. The average human being has an inherent dislike for work and will
avoid it if possible.
2. Because of this human characteristic of dislike for work, most
employees must be coerced, controlled, directed and threatened
with punishment to get them to put forth adequate effort towards
achieving organizational objectives.
3. Most people are not ambitious, have little desire for responsibility,
and prefer to be directed or led.
4. The average man is by nature indolent - he works as little as
possible.
5. Most people have little capacity for creativity in solving
organizational problems.
6. Motivation occurs only at the physiological and safety levels.
7. Most people are inherently self-centered, indifferent to
organizational needs.
8. Man is by nature resistant to change.
5. Rigid patterns: Theory X results in rigid patterns of control
which may be applied in many ways. First, the theory advocates
close and careful supervision. Second, it relies on many
detailed directions such as demanding complete compliance
from the workers. Third, if employers feel the workers do not
perform their duties they threaten them with firing and
withdrawal of pay.
Insistence on centralized power: All decisions are made and
channeled from the top. The workers do not have any say in
matters which affect them. Thus, it leads to authoritarian
leadership. In the school, it may show up in teacher dominated
classroom where students do not have any say. He might arbitrarily
decide to punish students by giving them undeserved low grades. '
6. Another problem with Theory X is that it concerns itself
exclusively with high productivity of the organization at the
expense of the workers. They are exploited and their morale
becomes low.
Administrators who use Theory X approach adopt wrong
attitudes towards the workers, considering them to be
unreliable, irresponsible and immature. The workers are
therefore not given any important responsibilities or involved in
decision-making.
In sum, what is fundamental to Theory X is a philosophy of
direction, close supervision, external control and
authoritarian and directive style of leadership.
7. Theory Y's assumptions represent a much more positive
assessment of human behaviour, and therefore related to
the human relations theory.
Theory Y assumes that people are creative and eager to
work.
Theory Y workers tend to desire more responsibility than
Theory X workers, and have strong desires to participate
in the decision making process.
Theory Y workers are comfortable in a working
environment which allows creativity and the opportunity
to become personally involved in organisational planning
8. 1. The expenditure of physical and mental efforts in work is as
natural as play or rest.
2. External control and the threat of punishment are not the only
means of bringing about efforts towards organizational objectives
to which they are committed.
3. Commitment to objectives is a functions of the rewards associated
with their achievement.
4. The average human being learns, under proper conditions, not
only to accept, but also to seek responsibility.
5. The capacity to exercise a relatively high degree of imagination,
ingenuity and creativity in the solution of organizational problems
is widely and not narrowly distributed in the population.
6. Under the condition of modem industrial life, the intellectual
potentialities of the average human being are only partially realized
or utilized.
9. 1. Administrators who are Theory Y oriented seek
information from their workers and listen to them.
They will be concerned with the welfare of their
workers and willingly listen to their problems.
In the classroom, the teacher who is Y oriented will
be student oriented and give them freedom to express
their ideas, and give them support in their class work.
1. The belief in Theory Y also leads to decentralization
of activities or power and delegation of authority.
That is, responsibilities are shared among workers.
Besides, the workers are given authority to a certain
extent.
10. For example, the workers are given a large measure of
self-control, self direction, freedom to act
(participate), responsibility and recognition for
achievement. By this the worker becomes highly
motivated.
1. Workers are regarded as responsible and mature and
therefore treated with due respect.
2. Finally a theory Y managerial behaviour would reflect
a less authoritarian or democratic leadership style.
11. In sum, as pointed out by Szilagyi (1981), Theory Y
encourages:
(1) delegating authority for many decisions to lower
level workers;
(2) making an effort to make workers' job less routine
and boring;
(3) increasing the level of responsibility in each
worker's job;
(4) improving the free flow of information and
communication within the organization; and
(5) recognizing that people are motivated by a
complex set of psychological needs, not just money.
12. Theory Z is the term coined by William G. Ouchi to
characterize the Japanese approach to managing a
business.
Like Theory Y, Theory Z emphasizes concern for people
and participative or consultative decision-making.
Theory Z speaks of an organisational culture which
mirrors the Japanese culture in which workers are more
participative, and capable of performing many and varied
tasks.
Theory Z emphasises things such as job rotation,
broadening of skills, generalisation versus specialisation,
and the need for continuous training of workers
13. The most significant aspect of Theory Z, however, is
the importance it places on the traditional
mechanisms.
Ouchi believes, the secret of Japanese success, is the
great concern Japan's managers show for the
well-being and development of employees.
This philosophy based on several ideas that are
uniquely Japanese, emphasizes the workers as the key
to productivity and economic growth
14. 1. Life time employment
2. Collective decision-making
3. Collective responsibility
4. Slow evaluation and promotion
5. Implicit control mechanism
6. Non-specialized career paths
7. Holistic concern for employee as a person.