This document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) construction project to date. It shows that total CIP construction spending was $256,955,525, of which $95,658,634 or 37% was spent on Small Business Enterprise (SBE), Women-owned Business Enterprise (WBE), Minority-owned Business Enterprise (MBE), Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), and Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) subcontractors and suppliers. It provides breakdowns of spending amounts and percentages for each of these categories. It also lists individual subcontractors and suppliers that worked on the project, indicating which categories each business falls under.
The document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) construction project to date. It shows that total spending to date is $236.3 million, of which $88.9 million or 38% was spent with small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending with different types of these businesses. The document also lists over 100 subcontractors that worked on the project, indicating if they were small, women-owned, minority-owned or disadvantaged businesses.
The document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) construction project to date. It shows that total CIP construction spending has been $292,599,951, of which $106,873,988 or 37% has gone to Small Business Enterprise (SBE), Women-Owned Business Enterprise (WBE), Minority-Owned Business Enterprise (MBE), Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), and Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) subcontractors. It then provides more detailed breakdowns of spending within each category.
The document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) construction project to date. It shows that total CIP construction spending is $222,762,569, of which $82,821,285 or 37% was spent on Small Business Enterprise (SBE), Women-owned Business Enterprise (WBE), Minority-owned Business Enterprise (MBE), Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), and Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) subcontractors and suppliers. It then provides further breakdowns of spending within each category. The document also lists individual subcontractors and suppliers that worked on the project, indicating whether each qualified as a SBE, WBE, MBE, DBE
The document summarizes spending to date on a Capital Improvement Program construction project totaling $183.3 million. Of that total, $66.3 million or 36% was spent with small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. The largest portions of protected spending went to small businesses ($52 million, 28%), minority businesses ($25.4 million, 14%) and disadvantaged businesses ($15.8 million, 9%). The document then lists individual subcontractors and their spending amounts in various protected categories.
This document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program to date. Total spending has been $273.5 million, of which $104.9 million (38%) has gone to small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. Specifically, spending has been $89.9 million (33%) to SBEs, $14.7 million (5%) to WBEs, $34.1 million (12%) to MBEs, $21.5 million (8%) to DBEs and $32.2 million (12%) to HUBs. The document then lists individual subcontractors and their spending amounts in each category.
This document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program to date. It shows that total spending to date is $213 million, of which $78.8 million (37%) was spent with small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending amounts and percentages for various subcategories of diverse suppliers. The document also lists numerous individual subcontractors that worked on the project, identifying whether they qualify as small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $187,486,443 on a capital improvement program. It shows that $69,556,188 or 37% of total spending went to small/women/minority/disadvantaged businesses. The top spending categories were Total SBE spending of $54,690,082 (29% of total) and Total MBE spending of $25,805,774 (14% of total). It then lists numerous individual contractor companies and their spending amounts in each small business category.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $238,059,622 on a capital improvement program. Of the total spending, $89,381,898 or 38% went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. Specifically, small business enterprises received $75,794,595 or 32% of total spending, while women-owned businesses received $9,503,939 or 4% and minority-owned businesses received $29,862,169 or 13%. The document also lists individual subcontractors and their spending amounts in various business categories.
The document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) construction project to date. It shows that total spending to date is $236.3 million, of which $88.9 million or 38% was spent with small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending with different types of these businesses. The document also lists over 100 subcontractors that worked on the project, indicating if they were small, women-owned, minority-owned or disadvantaged businesses.
The document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) construction project to date. It shows that total CIP construction spending has been $292,599,951, of which $106,873,988 or 37% has gone to Small Business Enterprise (SBE), Women-Owned Business Enterprise (WBE), Minority-Owned Business Enterprise (MBE), Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), and Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) subcontractors. It then provides more detailed breakdowns of spending within each category.
The document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) construction project to date. It shows that total CIP construction spending is $222,762,569, of which $82,821,285 or 37% was spent on Small Business Enterprise (SBE), Women-owned Business Enterprise (WBE), Minority-owned Business Enterprise (MBE), Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE), and Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) subcontractors and suppliers. It then provides further breakdowns of spending within each category. The document also lists individual subcontractors and suppliers that worked on the project, indicating whether each qualified as a SBE, WBE, MBE, DBE
The document summarizes spending to date on a Capital Improvement Program construction project totaling $183.3 million. Of that total, $66.3 million or 36% was spent with small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. The largest portions of protected spending went to small businesses ($52 million, 28%), minority businesses ($25.4 million, 14%) and disadvantaged businesses ($15.8 million, 9%). The document then lists individual subcontractors and their spending amounts in various protected categories.
This document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program to date. Total spending has been $273.5 million, of which $104.9 million (38%) has gone to small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. Specifically, spending has been $89.9 million (33%) to SBEs, $14.7 million (5%) to WBEs, $34.1 million (12%) to MBEs, $21.5 million (8%) to DBEs and $32.2 million (12%) to HUBs. The document then lists individual subcontractors and their spending amounts in each category.
This document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program to date. It shows that total spending to date is $213 million, of which $78.8 million (37%) was spent with small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending amounts and percentages for various subcategories of diverse suppliers. The document also lists numerous individual subcontractors that worked on the project, identifying whether they qualify as small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $187,486,443 on a capital improvement program. It shows that $69,556,188 or 37% of total spending went to small/women/minority/disadvantaged businesses. The top spending categories were Total SBE spending of $54,690,082 (29% of total) and Total MBE spending of $25,805,774 (14% of total). It then lists numerous individual contractor companies and their spending amounts in each small business category.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $238,059,622 on a capital improvement program. Of the total spending, $89,381,898 or 38% went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. Specifically, small business enterprises received $75,794,595 or 32% of total spending, while women-owned businesses received $9,503,939 or 4% and minority-owned businesses received $29,862,169 or 13%. The document also lists individual subcontractors and their spending amounts in various business categories.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $301,656,662 on a capital improvement program. It shows that $108,510,000 or 36% of total spending went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending amounts and percentages to various subcategories of these businesses. It also lists various subcontractors that performed work on the program, identifying whether they qualify as small, women, minority, disadvantaged or historically underutilized businesses.
The document summarizes spending to date on a Capital Improvement Program totaling $165,027,937. It shows that 37% of total spending, or $60,527,896, went to small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. It provides details on spending amounts and percentages to various subcontractors in these categories.
This document summarizes construction spending to date on capital improvement projects totaling $191,850,642. It shows that $71,460,043 or 37% was spent with small/women/minority/disadvantaged businesses. Specifically, 29% ($55,932,670) was spent with Small Business Enterprises, 4% ($7,446,555) with Women Business Enterprises, 14% ($26,216,189) with Minority Business Enterprises, and 8% ($16,270,506) with Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. It also lists individual subcontractors and the amounts paid to each.
This document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) construction project to date. It shows that total spending to date is $252,391,510, of which $93,878,341 or 37% has gone to small, women, minority, disadvantaged or historically underutilized business subcontractors and suppliers. The highest subcategories were $79,981,235 or 32% to small business enterprises and $30,025,789 or 12% to minority business enterprises. It then lists individual subcontractors or suppliers that have received payments, including whether they qualify as small, women, minority, disadvantaged or historically underutilized businesses.
The document summarizes spending to date on a Capital Improvement Program construction project totaling $325.7 million. Of the total spending, $116.4 million or 36% went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. The top categories were: total SBE spending of $98.7 million (30% of total), total MBE spending of $36.7 million (11% of total), and total WBE spending of $17.2 million (5% of total). The document also lists individual subcontractors or vendors that worked on the project, indicating if they were certified in various business categories.
The document summarizes spending to date on a Capital Improvement Program construction project. It shows that total spending to date is $298 million, of which $107 million or 36% was spent with small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending amounts and percentages for various subcategories of these businesses. The remainder of the document lists individual subcontractors that worked on the project, indicating whether they qualify as small, women, minority, disadvantaged or historically underutilized businesses.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $342,687,622 on a capital improvement program. Of the total spending, $127,851,722 or 37% went to small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. The largest portions of these funds went to small business enterprises ($109,245,129 or 32%) and women-owned business enterprises ($23,246,175 or 7%). The document then lists individual subcontractors or vendors that received funds, including whether they were certified in one or more of the business categories.
This document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $348,356,638, including $130,085,426 or 37% spent on small/women/minority/disadvantaged businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending amounts and percentages for various subcategories of diverse business spending, and lists various subcontractors that received payments, including whether they qualified as small, women, minority, disadvantaged or veteran-owned businesses.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $337,398,887 on a capital improvement program. It shows that 37% of total spending, or $123,246,981, went to small/women/minority/disadvantaged businesses. Specifically, 31% ($104,701,271) went to small businesses, 6% ($21,156,816) to women-owned businesses, and 13% ($42,320,345) to minority-owned businesses. The document also provides a breakdown of individual subcontractor payments by business type.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $342,687,622 on capital improvement projects. Of the total spending, $126,116,612 or 37% went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. The largest portions of protected spending went to small businesses at $107,526,338 or 31% of total spending and women-owned businesses at $22,593,825 or 7% of total spending. The document then lists individual subcontractors and the amounts they were paid in relation to their protected business classifications.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $304,871,453. It shows that $109,916,639 or 36% of total spending went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. The highest amounts went to small business enterprises ($93,942,731 or 31% of total spending), women business enterprises ($15,398,699 or 5% of total spending), and minority business enterprises ($34,361,401 or 11% of total spending). The document also provides a breakdown of individual subcontractor spending.
Businesses and organizations operating in the Southern Tier NY region.
(Oct 1, 2017 version. This is a work in progress - many of the 1,382 businesses have only been partially analyzed or not analyzed at all.)
If you want your company added (ESPECIALLY if you employ 25 or more) just let us know at IBB.
The document summarizes workforce trends in Texas, the Houston region, and at Houston Community College. It notes that while the Texas and Houston economies are growing and job demand is high, traditional college enrollment and the number of high school graduates entering higher education have been declining. TRUE Initiative grants awarded to HCC helped increase enrollment in cybersecurity, commercial driver's license training, and manufacturing programs to help close workforce skills gaps. However, sustained funding is needed to continue meeting the region's workforce needs as the economy grows.
The document provides an overview of Houston Community College System. It summarizes key student demographics which show the student body is diverse with over half being students of color. It also outlines the colleges' strategic priorities which focus on student success, diversity, personalized learning, and becoming the top choice for education. Additionally, it reviews the college's governance structure and administration.
The Houston Community College Small Business Development Program has made improvements to expand opportunities for certified small businesses. The program certification accepts additional certifications from the City of Houston and now includes minority, women, disabled, and disadvantaged owned businesses. The evaluation process for small businesses has also improved to maximize their chance of competing for and winning contracts. Certified small businesses can now receive up to 15 points based on their status and level of subcontracting with other certified small businesses.
This document is the procurement operations procedures manual for HCC. It provides definitions for over 75 procurement-related terms used throughout the manual. The table of contents shows that the manual contains articles on general provisions, sources of supplies and services, procurement methods, competitive sealed bidding, competitive sealed proposals, construction procurement, contract administration and close out. The document establishes standard procedures and guidelines for HCC's procurement processes.
This document provides information about Houston Community College (HCC) for the Common Data Set. It includes contact information for HCC's Office of Institutional Research and general information about HCC such as its status as a public community college with an open enrollment policy. Enrollment numbers from 2020-2021 are provided for full-time and part-time students by gender and race/ethnicity. Graduation and retention rates cannot be provided since HCC is a two-year institution. Application information is given showing total freshman applicants and admits for 2020. Admission requirements are not listed since HCC has an open enrollment policy.
This document contains the bylaws of the Board of Trustees of Houston Community College. It establishes ethics policies for trustees and senior staff, including a code of conduct. It has been amended over 30 times since its initial adoption in 2010 to update various sections. The bylaws cover topics like the board's powers and authority, committees, meetings, and operations. It aims to ensure high ethical standards and proper governance of the college.
This document outlines Houston Community College's regulation regarding ensuring equal access to technology resources for individuals with disabilities. It establishes guidelines for making the college's websites and digital content compliant with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Level AA. It defines key terms and roles, such as designating the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator as responsible for handling requests regarding inaccessible online content. The regulation applies to all college employees and users of technology resources, and states that inaccessible content must be made available in an equally effective alternative format upon request.
This document summarizes the bylaws of the Board of Trustees of Houston Community College. It outlines ethics policies for board members and senior staff, including standards of conduct, prohibited communications during the bid process, and requirements for disclosing conflicts of interest. The bylaws establish that board members must act in the best interests of the college, maintain confidentiality, and avoid undue external influence. Board members and senior staff are prohibited from certain communications with bidders during the bid period and from accepting related political contributions.
1. The document is a memorandum from the Chancellor of Houston Community College to the Board of Trustees regarding new reporting requirements under Texas law for incidents of sexual harassment, assault, dating violence or stalking.
2. It provides details on the requirements of Texas Education Code Section 51.253(c) which mandates that the Chancellor submit a report to the Board and post publicly on incidents reported and their dispositions.
3. Attached is the first report submitted by the Chancellor to the Board as required, providing summary data on 4 reports received under the relevant section of the Code and 1 report regarding failure to report from January to March 2020. The 3 investigations were still ongoing.
1) The document outlines Houston Community College's policy prohibiting discrimination, harassment, sexual harassment, sexual assault, dating violence, stalking, and retaliation.
2) It defines key terms like employee, sex or gender, and sexual harassment. It also defines prohibited conduct covered by the policy.
3) The policy establishes reporting procedures, including mandatory reporting requirements for employees, and designates the Title IX Coordinator to handle reports of sex discrimination.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $301,656,662 on a capital improvement program. It shows that $108,510,000 or 36% of total spending went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending amounts and percentages to various subcategories of these businesses. It also lists various subcontractors that performed work on the program, identifying whether they qualify as small, women, minority, disadvantaged or historically underutilized businesses.
The document summarizes spending to date on a Capital Improvement Program totaling $165,027,937. It shows that 37% of total spending, or $60,527,896, went to small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. It provides details on spending amounts and percentages to various subcontractors in these categories.
This document summarizes construction spending to date on capital improvement projects totaling $191,850,642. It shows that $71,460,043 or 37% was spent with small/women/minority/disadvantaged businesses. Specifically, 29% ($55,932,670) was spent with Small Business Enterprises, 4% ($7,446,555) with Women Business Enterprises, 14% ($26,216,189) with Minority Business Enterprises, and 8% ($16,270,506) with Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. It also lists individual subcontractors and the amounts paid to each.
This document summarizes spending on a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) construction project to date. It shows that total spending to date is $252,391,510, of which $93,878,341 or 37% has gone to small, women, minority, disadvantaged or historically underutilized business subcontractors and suppliers. The highest subcategories were $79,981,235 or 32% to small business enterprises and $30,025,789 or 12% to minority business enterprises. It then lists individual subcontractors or suppliers that have received payments, including whether they qualify as small, women, minority, disadvantaged or historically underutilized businesses.
The document summarizes spending to date on a Capital Improvement Program construction project totaling $325.7 million. Of the total spending, $116.4 million or 36% went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. The top categories were: total SBE spending of $98.7 million (30% of total), total MBE spending of $36.7 million (11% of total), and total WBE spending of $17.2 million (5% of total). The document also lists individual subcontractors or vendors that worked on the project, indicating if they were certified in various business categories.
The document summarizes spending to date on a Capital Improvement Program construction project. It shows that total spending to date is $298 million, of which $107 million or 36% was spent with small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending amounts and percentages for various subcategories of these businesses. The remainder of the document lists individual subcontractors that worked on the project, indicating whether they qualify as small, women, minority, disadvantaged or historically underutilized businesses.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $342,687,622 on a capital improvement program. Of the total spending, $127,851,722 or 37% went to small, women-owned, minority-owned, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. The largest portions of these funds went to small business enterprises ($109,245,129 or 32%) and women-owned business enterprises ($23,246,175 or 7%). The document then lists individual subcontractors or vendors that received funds, including whether they were certified in one or more of the business categories.
This document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $348,356,638, including $130,085,426 or 37% spent on small/women/minority/disadvantaged businesses. It provides breakdowns of spending amounts and percentages for various subcategories of diverse business spending, and lists various subcontractors that received payments, including whether they qualified as small, women, minority, disadvantaged or veteran-owned businesses.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $337,398,887 on a capital improvement program. It shows that 37% of total spending, or $123,246,981, went to small/women/minority/disadvantaged businesses. Specifically, 31% ($104,701,271) went to small businesses, 6% ($21,156,816) to women-owned businesses, and 13% ($42,320,345) to minority-owned businesses. The document also provides a breakdown of individual subcontractor payments by business type.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $342,687,622 on capital improvement projects. Of the total spending, $126,116,612 or 37% went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged, or historically underutilized businesses. The largest portions of protected spending went to small businesses at $107,526,338 or 31% of total spending and women-owned businesses at $22,593,825 or 7% of total spending. The document then lists individual subcontractors and the amounts they were paid in relation to their protected business classifications.
The document summarizes construction spending to date totaling $304,871,453. It shows that $109,916,639 or 36% of total spending went to small, women, minority, disadvantaged and historically underutilized businesses. The highest amounts went to small business enterprises ($93,942,731 or 31% of total spending), women business enterprises ($15,398,699 or 5% of total spending), and minority business enterprises ($34,361,401 or 11% of total spending). The document also provides a breakdown of individual subcontractor spending.
Businesses and organizations operating in the Southern Tier NY region.
(Oct 1, 2017 version. This is a work in progress - many of the 1,382 businesses have only been partially analyzed or not analyzed at all.)
If you want your company added (ESPECIALLY if you employ 25 or more) just let us know at IBB.
The document summarizes workforce trends in Texas, the Houston region, and at Houston Community College. It notes that while the Texas and Houston economies are growing and job demand is high, traditional college enrollment and the number of high school graduates entering higher education have been declining. TRUE Initiative grants awarded to HCC helped increase enrollment in cybersecurity, commercial driver's license training, and manufacturing programs to help close workforce skills gaps. However, sustained funding is needed to continue meeting the region's workforce needs as the economy grows.
The document provides an overview of Houston Community College System. It summarizes key student demographics which show the student body is diverse with over half being students of color. It also outlines the colleges' strategic priorities which focus on student success, diversity, personalized learning, and becoming the top choice for education. Additionally, it reviews the college's governance structure and administration.
The Houston Community College Small Business Development Program has made improvements to expand opportunities for certified small businesses. The program certification accepts additional certifications from the City of Houston and now includes minority, women, disabled, and disadvantaged owned businesses. The evaluation process for small businesses has also improved to maximize their chance of competing for and winning contracts. Certified small businesses can now receive up to 15 points based on their status and level of subcontracting with other certified small businesses.
This document is the procurement operations procedures manual for HCC. It provides definitions for over 75 procurement-related terms used throughout the manual. The table of contents shows that the manual contains articles on general provisions, sources of supplies and services, procurement methods, competitive sealed bidding, competitive sealed proposals, construction procurement, contract administration and close out. The document establishes standard procedures and guidelines for HCC's procurement processes.
This document provides information about Houston Community College (HCC) for the Common Data Set. It includes contact information for HCC's Office of Institutional Research and general information about HCC such as its status as a public community college with an open enrollment policy. Enrollment numbers from 2020-2021 are provided for full-time and part-time students by gender and race/ethnicity. Graduation and retention rates cannot be provided since HCC is a two-year institution. Application information is given showing total freshman applicants and admits for 2020. Admission requirements are not listed since HCC has an open enrollment policy.
This document contains the bylaws of the Board of Trustees of Houston Community College. It establishes ethics policies for trustees and senior staff, including a code of conduct. It has been amended over 30 times since its initial adoption in 2010 to update various sections. The bylaws cover topics like the board's powers and authority, committees, meetings, and operations. It aims to ensure high ethical standards and proper governance of the college.
This document outlines Houston Community College's regulation regarding ensuring equal access to technology resources for individuals with disabilities. It establishes guidelines for making the college's websites and digital content compliant with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Level AA. It defines key terms and roles, such as designating the ADA/Section 504 Coordinator as responsible for handling requests regarding inaccessible online content. The regulation applies to all college employees and users of technology resources, and states that inaccessible content must be made available in an equally effective alternative format upon request.
This document summarizes the bylaws of the Board of Trustees of Houston Community College. It outlines ethics policies for board members and senior staff, including standards of conduct, prohibited communications during the bid process, and requirements for disclosing conflicts of interest. The bylaws establish that board members must act in the best interests of the college, maintain confidentiality, and avoid undue external influence. Board members and senior staff are prohibited from certain communications with bidders during the bid period and from accepting related political contributions.
1. The document is a memorandum from the Chancellor of Houston Community College to the Board of Trustees regarding new reporting requirements under Texas law for incidents of sexual harassment, assault, dating violence or stalking.
2. It provides details on the requirements of Texas Education Code Section 51.253(c) which mandates that the Chancellor submit a report to the Board and post publicly on incidents reported and their dispositions.
3. Attached is the first report submitted by the Chancellor to the Board as required, providing summary data on 4 reports received under the relevant section of the Code and 1 report regarding failure to report from January to March 2020. The 3 investigations were still ongoing.
1) The document outlines Houston Community College's policy prohibiting discrimination, harassment, sexual harassment, sexual assault, dating violence, stalking, and retaliation.
2) It defines key terms like employee, sex or gender, and sexual harassment. It also defines prohibited conduct covered by the policy.
3) The policy establishes reporting procedures, including mandatory reporting requirements for employees, and designates the Title IX Coordinator to handle reports of sex discrimination.
This document outlines Houston Community College's policy on sex and gender discrimination, including sexual harassment and retaliation. It defines discrimination and prohibited conduct, and establishes procedures for reporting, investigating, and resolving complaints. It designates the Title IX Coordinator and states that any employee receiving a report must notify them. It also provides examples of corrective actions that may be taken following investigations.
This document outlines the bylaws of the Board of Trustees of Houston Community College. It was originally adopted on January 1, 2010 and has been amended numerous times, with the most recent amendment on February 5, 2020. The bylaws cover topics such as ethics and standards of conduct for trustees and staff, the powers and responsibilities of the board, elections, meetings, committees, and board operations. The purpose is to provide internal governance and management for the board and its activities in accordance with applicable laws.
The Houston Community College System's (HCC) total assets decreased by $5.4 million from fiscal year 2018 primarily due to spending $19.4 million to complete capital improvement projects, reducing restricted cash and investments. Total liabilities increased by $76.4 million mainly due to changes in pension and other post-employment benefit assumptions. HCC's net position increased by $3 million to $393 million for fiscal year 2019 despite higher pension and other post-employment benefit expenses. Non-operating revenues increased by $8 million.
This document is Houston Community College's 2019 Annual Clery Security Report, which provides crime statistics and safety policies for the college as required by law. It summarizes crime data for 2018, including reports of crimes such as burglary, assault, and dating violence. It also outlines the college's policies for reporting crimes, making timely warnings, and preparing the annual disclosure. The report provides definitions of Clery-defined crimes and lists contact information for campus safety authorities.
The document is Houston Community College's updated 2019 procurement plan listing 63 anticipated solicitations for goods and services projected to be sourced during the year, grouped by month. It notes that additional needs may be added and that official solicitation notices will be posted on the procurement website. It also outlines prohibited communication policies for proposers during the "blackout period" between advertisement and contract execution or cancellation.
This document provides information about Houston Community College for a Common Data Set. It includes contact information for the college, basic facts such as the types of degrees offered and academic calendar, enrollment numbers broken down by gender and race/ethnicity, persistence and graduation rates, and retention rates. Houston Community College is a public, coeducational institution located in Houston, Texas that offers associate degrees and certificates on a semester system with an undergraduate enrollment of over 57,000 students as of fall 2018.
The document provides tips on how to recognize email scams by learning to spot suspicious elements like generic salutations, alarmist messages, grammatical errors, requests for personal information, and emails that do not come from official college domains. Examples are given of phishing emails disguising themselves as being from Houston Community College but with email addresses from outlook.com, gmail.com, and foreign domains, as well as links that do not match the displayed text. Readers are advised to be wary of these types of suspicious emails.
The document discusses the history and development of artificial intelligence over the past 70 years. It outlines some of the key milestones in AI research including the creation of logic theories, machine learning algorithms, and neural networks. Recent advances in deep learning have helped AI systems match and even surpass human-level performance in certain domains like image recognition and natural language processing.
This document contains the bylaws of the Board of Trustees of Houston Community College that were adopted on January 1, 2010 and have been amended multiple times since. The bylaws cover topics such as ethics, powers and duties of the board, committees, meetings, and board operations. Specifically, Article A establishes ethics policies for board members and senior staff including conflict of interest disclosure, prohibited communications during procurement processes, and a code of conduct.
Andreas Schleicher presents PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Thinking - 18 Jun...EduSkills OECD
Andreas Schleicher, Director of Education and Skills at the OECD presents at the launch of PISA 2022 Volume III - Creative Minds, Creative Schools on 18 June 2024.
Temple of Asclepius in Thrace. Excavation resultsKrassimira Luka
The temple and the sanctuary around were dedicated to Asklepios Zmidrenus. This name has been known since 1875 when an inscription dedicated to him was discovered in Rome. The inscription is dated in 227 AD and was left by soldiers originating from the city of Philippopolis (modern Plovdiv).
THE SACRIFICE HOW PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTS STUDENTS ARE SACRIFICING TO CHANGE T...indexPub
The recent surge in pro-Palestine student activism has prompted significant responses from universities, ranging from negotiations and divestment commitments to increased transparency about investments in companies supporting the war on Gaza. This activism has led to the cessation of student encampments but also highlighted the substantial sacrifices made by students, including academic disruptions and personal risks. The primary drivers of these protests are poor university administration, lack of transparency, and inadequate communication between officials and students. This study examines the profound emotional, psychological, and professional impacts on students engaged in pro-Palestine protests, focusing on Generation Z's (Gen-Z) activism dynamics. This paper explores the significant sacrifices made by these students and even the professors supporting the pro-Palestine movement, with a focus on recent global movements. Through an in-depth analysis of printed and electronic media, the study examines the impacts of these sacrifices on the academic and personal lives of those involved. The paper highlights examples from various universities, demonstrating student activism's long-term and short-term effects, including disciplinary actions, social backlash, and career implications. The researchers also explore the broader implications of student sacrifices. The findings reveal that these sacrifices are driven by a profound commitment to justice and human rights, and are influenced by the increasing availability of information, peer interactions, and personal convictions. The study also discusses the broader implications of this activism, comparing it to historical precedents and assessing its potential to influence policy and public opinion. The emotional and psychological toll on student activists is significant, but their sense of purpose and community support mitigates some of these challenges. However, the researchers call for acknowledging the broader Impact of these sacrifices on the future global movement of FreePalestine.
How to Setup Default Value for a Field in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, we can set a default value for a field during the creation of a record for a model. We have many methods in odoo for setting a default value to the field.
CapTechTalks Webinar Slides June 2024 Donovan Wright.pptxCapitolTechU
Slides from a Capitol Technology University webinar held June 20, 2024. The webinar featured Dr. Donovan Wright, presenting on the Department of Defense Digital Transformation.
Information and Communication Technology in EducationMJDuyan
(𝐓𝐋𝐄 𝟏𝟎𝟎) (𝐋𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐧 2)-𝐏𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐂𝐓 𝐢𝐧 𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐜𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧:
Students will be able to explain the role and impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in education. They will understand how ICT tools, such as computers, the internet, and educational software, enhance learning and teaching processes. By exploring various ICT applications, students will recognize how these technologies facilitate access to information, improve communication, support collaboration, and enable personalized learning experiences.
𝐃𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐮𝐬𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞 𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐞𝐭:
-Students will be able to discuss what constitutes reliable sources on the internet. They will learn to identify key characteristics of trustworthy information, such as credibility, accuracy, and authority. By examining different types of online sources, students will develop skills to evaluate the reliability of websites and content, ensuring they can distinguish between reputable information and misinformation.
Information and Communication Technology in Education
SBE Report (Through March 31, 2017)
1. Total CIP Construction Spending to Date 256,955,525$
Total SBE/WBE/MBE/DBE/HUB Spending to Date 95,658,634$
As Percent of Total Spending to Date 37%
Total SBE Spending to Date 81,738,960
As Percent of Total Spending to Date 32%
Total WBE Spending to Date 11,367,068
As Percent of Total Spending to Date 4%
Total MBE Spending to Date 30,157,715
As Percent of Total Spending to Date 12%
Total DBE Spending to Date 18,238,876
As Percent of Total Spending to Date 7%
Total HUB Spending to Date 30,325,993
As Percent of Total Spending to Date 12%
Subs SBE WBE MBE DBE HUB Paid
Aggregate Technologies, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 73,546
AGS Consultants, LLC Y Y Y Y (blank) 35,555
Alliance Laboratories, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 303,047
Alpha Insulation O (blan (blan (blanY 637,742
A‐One Sprinkler O (blan (blan (blanY 308,849
Apollo BBC, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 6,175
Aquascapes Irrigation O (blan Y Y Y 31,920
ARK Engineers Y (blan Y Y Y 23,500
A‐Rocket Moving & Storage, Inc. O (blan Y (blanY 87,562
Arrow Services, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 213,461
AS THE CROW FLIES TRANSPORT & HAULING O (blan (blan (blanY 9,000
ASA Dally, Inc. O (blan Y Y (blank) 396,918
Asakura Robinson Company LLC Y (blan Y Y Y 156,789
Associated Operations, Inc., DBA Harper Wood Electrical Co. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 923,644
AUTOARCH Architects, LLC Y Y (blan Y (blank) 556,509
Aviles Engineering Corporation O (blan Y Y (blank) 21,611
B & C Painting and Wallcovering, LLC Y (blan Y Y (blank) 329,810
B M F SOLUTIONS, LLP Y (blan (blan (blanY 238,041
B&E Reprographics, Inc. Y (blan Y Y Y 12,312
Baker Painting & Wallcovering, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 450
Bamex Painting, Inc. Y (blan Y (blan(blank) 203,082
Bandos Steel, LLC Y (blan Y Y (blank) 2,851,036
Belknap Concrete, Cutting & Drilling, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 875
Belknap Plumbing Systems, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 993,690
Big Daddy Electric Inc. of Texas Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 707,045
Burns and Burns, Inc. DBA Astro Fence Company Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 116,725
Burts Construction Inc. Y (blan (blan (blanY 402,787
Bynam Enterprises (dba Able Paving) Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 6,469
Byrne Metals Corp Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 2,880,859
Calderon Trucking O (blan (blan Y (blank) 1,500
Canalco, Inc Y (blan Y Y (blank) 640,335
Central Marble & Tile, Inc. O (blan Y Y Y 95,791
Clark Condon Associates, Inc. O Y (blan (blanY 62,576
COLEMAN TBG PARTNERS, LLC, DBA COLEMAN TBG Y Y (blan (blan(blank) 65,000
Collaborate Arch LLC, DBA Collaborate Architects Y (blan Y (blanY 728,512
Commercial Flooring, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 472,550
Construction EcoServices II, Inc., DBA Construction EcoServices Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 10,206
Correct Electric Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 3,676,223
CSF Consulting, L.P. DBA CSF Y (blan Y Y (blank) 67,200
Data Design Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 5,000
Datacom Design Group, LLC O Y (blan (blanY 274,202
Digital Air Control Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 80,168
Dirden Landscape & Irrigation, Inc., DBA Creative Landscapes of Texas Y (blan Y Y (blank) 2,129
DistribAire, Inc. Y (blan Y (blanY 3,219,769
DNA Trucking, Inc. Y (blan Y Y (blank) 563,764
Duty Construction Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 2,725,527
E&C Engineers & Consultants, Inc. O Y (blan (blan(blank) 1,071,775
Eagle Fabricators, Inc. Y (blan Y (blan(blank) 1,084,479
EDH Plumbing Contractors, LLC Y (blan Y (blanY 232,155
Elias Commercial Roof Systems Y Y Y (blanY 349,503
Ellis Surveying Services LLC Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 5,893
Emerald Standard Services Inc. Y (blan Y Y Y 2,794,190
Empire Acero, LLC Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 2,097,555
Energy Electric Supply Y (blan Y Y (blank) 1,175,490
Enerspace Modular Group O (blan (blan (blanY 26,228
2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(THROUGH 31 MARCH 2017)
2013 CIP SBE Report (201703 Close) 20170330 ‐ Chuck Web Version Pivot Page 1 of 3
2. Environmental Allies GP, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blanY 78,718
Enviro‐San Corporation, DBA Clunn Acoustical Systems Y Y (blan (blan(blank) 3,752,731
ERC ENVIRONMENTAL & CONSTRUCTION SERV Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 104,617
Esbee Signs, Inc. Y (blan Y (blanY 99,250
Executive Cleaning Corp. Y Y Y (blan(blank) 10,367
Facility Interiors, Inc. O (blan (blan (blanY 4,650,477
FGH FABRICATORS INC O (blan (blan (blanY 144,236
Friendswood Contracting Company, LLC Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 430,963
Fronza & Francis, LLC Y Y Y Y (blank) 511,858
GARZABURY, LLC O (blan (blan (blanY 184,762
Gennoa French Enterprises, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 148,055
George Meeks LandPRO, Inc. Y (blan Y Y (blank) 168,889
Glennlock Construction Group, L.L.C. Y (blan Y (blan(blank) 565,539
GLV Interest, Inc., DBA Vossler Plumbing Company Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 176,054
Golden West Enterprises, Inc., DBA Golden West Plastering Company Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 205,176
Grant Equipment Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 803,641
Guerrero Trucking O (blan (blan (blanY 3,800
Gulf Coast Railings, Inc Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 134,600
Gurrola Reprographics, Inc. Y (blan Y Y (blank) 1,896
H&E Aggregate Y Y (blan Y (blank) 211,264
Halford Busby Y Y (blan Y Y 263,508
Hardman Signs Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 36,053
Harrison Kornberg Architects, LLC Y (blan Y Y Y 887,195
Henderson + Rodgers (Rogers Moore Engineers) Y Y (blan Y Y 186,620
Hoffman Engineering Group, Inc, DBA Ibis Engineering Y (blan (blan (blanY 219,850
Horizon International Group Y Y Y (blanY 2,610,764
Hydrozone Landscape Corporation Y (blan Y Y Y 19,950
IDC Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 1,376,335
Industry Junction, Inc. Y (blan Y (blanY 62,432
Infrastructure Associates, Inc. O (blan Y (blanY 1,544,335
IronForge Systems, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 39,600
ISANI CONSULTANTS, L.P. Y (blan Y Y (blank) 192,813
J Cruz Transport LLC Y (blan Y Y Y 134,213
Jewels Cleaning, LLC Y Y Y Y (blank) 27,675
John A. Walker Roofing Co. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 708,556
JZ CONSTRUCTION Y (blan Y (blan(blank) 229,670
Kauffman Company Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 903,729
KCI Concrete Color Systems, LLC Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 1,504,222
Kitchen and Bars of Houston Mfg. Co., Inc., DBA Architectural Metal Crafts Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 120,540
Klinger Specialties Direct, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 217,371
Koasati Construction Management Y (blan Y (blan(blank) 1,365,099
KSM MATERIALS HANDLING CORPORATION (Houston Steel Equipment) O (blan (blan (blanY 42,775
Langrand Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 547,534
Lazer Construction Company, Inc. Y (blan Y Y (blank) 992,027
Llewelyn‐Davies Sahni II, LLC Y (blan Y Y Y 89,660
Lucero's Trucking, LLC O (blan (blan (blanY 750
M.K. Dailey Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 511,260
Magnum Air Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 3,877,847
Manco Structures O (blan (blan (blanY 1,730,450
Matrix Structural Engineers, Inc. Y (blan Y Y (blank) 232,860
Mechanical Piping Systems Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 361,650
Medina Supply, Inc. Y (blan Y Y Y 791,700
MGC Millwork, LP Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 449,522
Mickie Service Company, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 13,325
Middleton Brown O (blan Y Y (blank) 184,089
Milam & Co Painting, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 86,220
Mitchell Chuoke Plumbing Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 4,581,700
Moody Flooring Services, LLC Y Y (blan (blan(blank) 89,871
MSD Building Corporation Y (blan (blan (blanY 1,298,011
NAO Global Health LLC Y Y Y (blan(blank) 21,220
Natex Corporation, DBA NATEX Corporation Architects Y Y Y (blanY 92,017
Nathelyne A. Kennedy & Associates, L.P. Y Y Y Y (blank) 42,582
Olivier, Inc. Y Y Y (blanY 235,218
Online Air Balancing Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 21,144
OTHON, INC. Y (blan Y Y (blank) 118,780
Oxford Builders Inc. O (blan Y Y Y 166,381
OZ Building Contractors Inc. Y Y Y Y (blank) 324,111
P^2MG, LLC Y (blan Y Y (blank) 461,061
Pachas Trucking O (blan (blan Y Y 2,250
Payless Insulation, Inc. Y Y (blan Y (blank) 18,900
Pfeiffer & Son, Ltd. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 57,945
Precision Land Surveying, Inc. Y (blan Y Y Y 48,644
Proficient Electric, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 1,971,900
Project Cost Resources, Inc. O Y (blan (blan(blank) 262,613
Pyramid Masonry Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 656,121
Rogers Moore Engineers O (blan (blan (blanY 664,503
RPH Consulting Group LLC Y (blan Y Y (blank) 48,479
S & V Surveying, Inc Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 30,227
S&S HVAC Equipment, LLC Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 513,218
2013 CIP SBE Report (201703 Close) 20170330 ‐ Chuck Web Version Pivot Page 2 of 3
3. Saabs Construction Company, Inc. Y (blan Y Y (blank) 227,464
Sam's Safety Equipment Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 3,500
SCIMETRICS, INC. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 4,197
Separation Systems Consultants, Inc., DBA SSCI Y Y (blan (blanY 290,628
Shah Smith & Associates Inc. Y (blan Y (blan(blank) 329,472
Shiloh Enterprises, Incorporated, DBA Shiloh Construction Company Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 781,172
Siren Steel, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blanY 1,045,199
Slack & Co. Contracting, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 522,003
Smith & Company Architects Y (blan Y (blanY 83,908
Sology, LLC O (blan (blan (blanY 112,464
Soni Appliance Service Y (blan Y (blan(blank) 5,037
Southern Global Safety Service O (blan (blan (blanY 25,095
Starcraft Interior Contractors, Ltd. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 3,506,320
STONE CASTLE INDUSTRIES, INC. O (blan (blan (blanY 111,205
Sullivan Land Services LTD Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 4,737
Taylor Construction Y (blan Y Y Y 1,061,723
Tejas Office Products, Inc O (blan Y Y Y 2,682
Teliosity, LLC Y (blan (blan (blanY 105,908
Texana Builders, LLC Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 1,853,221
Texas Premier Drywall Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 636,389
The Maddox Group, Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 474,445
The Principle Partnering Group, LLC Y (blan Y Y (blank) 147,420
Tolunay‐Wong Engineers O (blan (blan (blanY 297,577
United Interiors, LLC O (blan (blan (blanY 546,718
Vergel Gay & Associates Y (blan Y Y Y 698,990
Vogler Sheet Metal Co., Inc. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 388,375
VoltAir Consulting Engineers‐Texas, LLC O (blan Y Y (blank) 216,837
Woodlands Contracting Group, Inc., DBA Gulf Star Roofing & Sheetmetal Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 860,638
Young & Sons Drywall, L.P. Y (blan (blan (blan(blank) 582,598
Manager Small Business
veronica.douglas@hccs.edu
http://www.hccs.edu/district/departments/procurement/small‐business‐procurement/
If you are a small business owner and feel you have faced unfair or excessive barriers to participation, please feel free to direct
your concerns to our Manager of Small Business Procurement. As a dedicated Small Business liaison, the Manager of Small Business
Procurement directs all reported problems to the appropriate HCC department for review and works across departmetal boundaries
to address those concerns, reduce participation burdens, and help small businessess to succeed. Please contact:
Veronica Douglas
2013 CIP SBE Report (201703 Close) 20170330 ‐ Chuck Web Version Pivot Page 3 of 3