This document discusses issues with using infrared imaging from satellites for surveillance purposes. It notes that infrared imaging can only be used at night and produces unclear, fuzzy images. These unclear images could be intentionally misrepresented by altering the imaging algorithms. Any data transmitted from satellites, including infrared images and email, could potentially be falsified. The document raises concerns that infrared energies beamed from satellites could potentially be misused or harm human brains, though international law does not currently place limits on infrared transmission levels from satellites. It suggests there should be legal recourse if infrared energies were to damage human brains.

1. Satellite Infrared (IR)
Satellite views are picturesque when recorded in the visible range and
shown on a visual display.
From an intelligence (surveillance) point of view, the technique would
only be effective during daylight hours at the latitude photographed
from the GPS camera in orbit.
For nighttime image capture, infrared energies would need to be used to
obtain resolution. The resolution would be fuzzy or unclear. The unclear
images would be unclear to a court of law, but could still be acceptable
for making decisions from a surface viewing position regardless of legal
impact in an Earth-surface court of law.
Since the unclear images are projections of algorithms (that alter visual
display frame sequencing,) a small change in algorithmic programming
(code) could make an IR image, as recorded, inaccurate. In that case, the
image that was used to make decisions, from the ground, could be
intentionally misrepresented as well by the code writer.
These facts would apply to microwave transmissions through space
between and among satellites and satellites among ground receiving
positions and relays. These facts would then apply to email information
and image information across Internet nodes as well.
Then the images and data used to make decisions, from the ground,
could be false through measurement, through observation, and also
through deception.
While an image could be used for focusing actions on the Earth surface,
that same image could be falsified as-presented to the person affecting
the ground action and could further be misrepresented later in a court
of law.
To increase the clarity of surface images using infrared (IR)
wavelengths, the beam energy would need to be increased.

2. Since there is no international maritime law enforced on IR (or most
other) energies of detection from satellite, there should be no limit at
which the energies could arrive at the human brain.
The human brain function, process, visual reception, and thought are
based on very low energies in chemical states within hydrocarbon
molecules. It seems there should be enforcement action available for the
safety of the population regarding misuse (or negligence) of IR energies
transmitted to the ground from a satellite, especially from a GPS
satellite.
It also seems that the human brain should then have recourse, in a court
of law, in the State of damage as well as in the State of satellite origin.
I appreciate that these images were brought to my attention.