This rubric evaluates Glogs (online posters) on four categories: required elements, resources' relevance, grammar, and attractiveness. A poster can earn up to 22 points total by including all required elements about celebrations, using relevant resources clearly related to the topic, having minimal grammatical mistakes, and being well organized with an exceptional design. Lower scores are given for missing required elements, unclear or irrelevant resource use, grammatical errors that impede understanding, or a messy or poorly designed layout. The rubric also considers if the poster was sent or published on time.

1. Rubric to asses a Glog (online poster)
CATEGORY 5 4 3 2
Required The poster includes All required There are some Several required
Elements all required elements required elements elements
elements (vocabulary related (vocabulary related (vocabulary related
(vocabulary related to celebrations) are to celebrations) to celebrations)
to celebrations) as included on the included. were missing.
well as additional poster.
information.
Resources’ All resources The use of There is too much There is no use of
Relevance (photos, video, resources is ok or not justified use extra resources
audio) are well and (photos, video, of resources (photos, videos,
are related with the audio). But it is not (photos, video, audio)
topic clear its relationship audio). Because
with the topic. there is no
relationship with
the topic.
Grammar There are no There are some There are some There are too many
grammatical grammatical grammatical mistakes that make
mistakes on the mistakes but do not mistakes that almost impossible to
poster. affect the make the message understand the
understanding of the difficult to message.
message. understand.
Attractiveness The poster is well The poster is The poster is The poster is messy
organized and organized and acceptably or very poorly
exceptionally attractive in terms of attractive though it designed. It is not
attractive in terms of design, layout and may be a bit attractive.
design, layout and colors’ selection messy.
colors’ selection. though it could have
been improved
Send/publish it Yes (2) No (0)
on time
Students name: ________________________________________ points: ___/ 22
Comments:
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
Mark:___________________