Rtpcr
•
0 likes•8 views
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on November 23, 2021 and reported on November 24, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, testing method used, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 22-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report outlines information about corona viruses, the test methodology, and notes that a negative result should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient and does not rule out infection. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq summarizes that: a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction testing; the test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19; and a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report also provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes with the signatures of the reviewing microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on December 24, 2021 and reported on December 25, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of COVID-19 testing done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. Real-time PCR was used to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The test was intended to detect the virus that causes COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A 16-year-old female presented with a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab that was tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 48-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Recommended
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 22-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report outlines information about corona viruses, the test methodology, and notes that a negative result should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient and does not rule out infection. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq summarizes that: a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction testing; the test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19; and a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report also provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes with the signatures of the reviewing microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on December 24, 2021 and reported on December 25, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of COVID-19 testing done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology used. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old female patient. The test resulted negative for SARS-CoV-2. Real-time PCR was used to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The test was intended to detect the virus that causes COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A 16-year-old female presented with a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab that was tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 48-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old male patient. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Sooraj Govindan, a 31-year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and exposure risks, as a false negative is possible. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 40-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on November 27, 2021 and reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Aswanth M and tested for COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the evaluating microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Nidhi Subhash shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Nidhi Subhash, a 24 year old female, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using RT-PCR. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report dated March 1, 2022 provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Rabiya T M on February 1, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test was conducted using real time polymerase chain reaction and produced a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and notes that a negative test result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a patient. The test result for the patient was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting negative and positive test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
1) The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 34-year-old male patient named Ashthaf Ali C. using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on 08/12/2021.
2) The test done was a SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen.
3) A negative result should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper collection, transport, or handling of the specimen.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides background information on corona viruses and the test methodology. It notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 47-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on February 1, 2022 and reported on March 1, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 26-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/10/2021 and reported on 20/10/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
A molecular biology report for a 58-year-old female patient named Mariyakunhi showed a negative result for COVID-19 from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 in Wuhan, China. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's given specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 46-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a 58-year-old female patient named CK Kunhamoo showed a SARS-CoV-2 test was negative. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report outlines information about corona viruses, the test methodology, and notes that a negative result should be interpreted in the clinical context and does not rule out infection. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 48-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
More Related Content
What's hot
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old male patient. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Sooraj Govindan, a 31-year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and exposure risks, as a false negative is possible. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 40-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on November 27, 2021 and reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Aswanth M and tested for COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the evaluating microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Nidhi Subhash shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Nidhi Subhash, a 24 year old female, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using RT-PCR. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report dated March 1, 2022 provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Rabiya T M on February 1, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test was conducted using real time polymerase chain reaction and produced a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and notes that a negative test result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a patient. The test result for the patient was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting negative and positive test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
1) The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 34-year-old male patient named Ashthaf Ali C. using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on 08/12/2021.
2) The test done was a SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen.
3) A negative result should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper collection, transport, or handling of the specimen.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides background information on corona viruses and the test methodology. It notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 47-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on February 1, 2022 and reported on March 1, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 26-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/10/2021 and reported on 20/10/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
A molecular biology report for a 58-year-old female patient named Mariyakunhi showed a negative result for COVID-19 from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 in Wuhan, China. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named C K Wasiq shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methodology. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's given specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 46-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a 58-year-old female patient named CK Kunhamoo showed a SARS-CoV-2 test was negative. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
What's hot (20)
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
Similar to Rtpcr
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 26-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report outlines information about corona viruses, the test methodology, and notes that a negative result should be interpreted in the clinical context and does not rule out infection. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 48-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 46-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report also provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 23/10/2021 and reported on the same day. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Ayshath Nafla summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, the meaning of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a sample collected from Mahin Izaan C H on 21/10/2021.
- The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) testing.
- A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 22-year old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
A molecular biology report for a patient named Aboobackar B A describes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was reported as SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. Additional information provided includes details on specimen collection and testing methodology, the pathogen being tested for, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 41-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 67-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test on the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The report provides information on the test method used, details on coronavirus and the implications of positive and negative test results. It concludes that the negative result should be considered in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Abdul Kader Arafath. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 44-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample from Sharique Muhammed Pandial, a 32-year-old male. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report also provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the interpreting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Zamiya Nafis shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal P V.
- The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not present in the sample.
- A negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The test was intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) and found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's condition.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 57-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected on December 30, 2021 and tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Similar to Rtpcr (20)
More from Care Reference Laboratory
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Certificate
This certificate confirms Saniya Bi Shaikh received two doses of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine. She received her first dose on August 3, 2021 from batch 4121Z088 and her second dose on October 30, 2021 from batch 4121Z105 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and contains contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Certificate
This certificate confirms that Saniya Bi Shaikh, an 18-year-old female, received the first dose of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine on July 3, 2021 and the second dose on September 30, 2021 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and lists contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a patient named Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR and was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample collected on April 2, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result for the patient identified as Mohammed Rameez M was negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted in the clinical context. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 04/02/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, testing method used, implications of positive and negative results, and notes that the results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Mohammed Ishak B A. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed on April 2, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 24-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, as the test has limitations. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the negative results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Nidhi Subash shows the results of a COVID-19 test. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Mohammed Rafeeq Marathanadi. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test. The test result was positive, indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A positive result suggests a diagnosis of COVID-19, though the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Ashthaf Ali C. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR analysis. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 56-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on January 24, 2022 and reported on January 24, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/12/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, the coronavirus tested for, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test. The test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient C K Wasiq was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Recently uploaded
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis - Pathogenesis , Clinical Features & Manage...
In this presentation , SBP ( spontaneous bacterial peritonitis ) , which is a common complication in patients with cirrhosis and ascites is described in detail.
The reference for this presentation is Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease Textbook ( 11th edition ).
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdf
Pollen and Fungal allergy: aeroallergy.pdfChulalongkorn Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group
Pollen and Fungal allergy
Presented by Chaloemchai Chumsaengchotsakul, MD.
June 14, 2024Breast cancer: Post menopausal endocrine therapy
Breast cancer in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) status is a common and complex condition that necessitates a multifaceted approach to management. HR+ breast cancer means that the cancer cells grow in response to hormones such as estrogen and progesterone. This subtype is prevalent among postmenopausal women and typically exhibits a more indolent course compared to other forms of breast cancer, which allows for a variety of treatment options.
Diagnosis and Staging
The diagnosis of HR+ breast cancer begins with clinical evaluation, imaging, and biopsy. Imaging modalities such as mammography, ultrasound, and MRI help in assessing the extent of the disease. Histopathological examination and immunohistochemical staining of the biopsy sample confirm the diagnosis and hormone receptor status by identifying the presence of estrogen receptors (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR) on the tumor cells.
Staging involves determining the size of the tumor (T), the involvement of regional lymph nodes (N), and the presence of distant metastasis (M). The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system is commonly used. Accurate staging is critical as it guides treatment decisions.
Treatment Options
Endocrine Therapy
Endocrine therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for HR+ breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The primary goal is to reduce the levels of estrogen or block its effects on cancer cells. Commonly used agents include:
Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs): Tamoxifen is a SERM that binds to estrogen receptors, blocking estrogen from stimulating breast cancer cells. It is effective but may have side effects such as increased risk of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic events.
Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs): These drugs, including anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, lower estrogen levels by inhibiting the aromatase enzyme, which converts androgens to estrogen in peripheral tissues. AIs are generally preferred in postmenopausal women due to their efficacy and safety profile compared to tamoxifen.
Selective Estrogen Receptor Downregulators (SERDs): Fulvestrant is a SERD that degrades estrogen receptors and is used in cases where resistance to other endocrine therapies develops.
Combination Therapies
Combining endocrine therapy with other treatments enhances efficacy. Examples include:
Endocrine Therapy with CDK4/6 Inhibitors: Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are CDK4/6 inhibitors that, when combined with endocrine therapy, significantly improve progression-free survival in advanced HR+ breast cancer.
Endocrine Therapy with mTOR Inhibitors: Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, can be added to endocrine therapy for patients who have developed resistance to aromatase inhibitors.
Chemotherapy
Chemotherapy is generally reserved for patients with high-risk features, such as large tumor size, high-grade histology, or extensive lymph node involvement. Regimens often include anthracyclines and taxanes.
How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.
Respiratory issues like asthma are the most sensitive issue that is affecting millions worldwide. It hampers the daily activities leaving the body tired and breathless.
The key to a good grip on asthma is proper knowledge and management strategies. Understanding the patient-specific symptoms and carving out an effective treatment likewise is the best way to keep asthma under control.
NARCOTICS- POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR ITS USE
This document outlines policies and procedures for handling narcotic and controlled drugs in NABH accredited hospitals.
Call Girls In Mumbai +91-7426014248 High Profile Call Girl Mumbai
Call Girls In Mumbai +91-7426014248 High Profile Call Girl Mumbai
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
This quiz was conducted as a promotional event for the 2024 Annual Meet of Kerala Chapter of API.
More than 20 participants took part everyday !
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
The skin is the largest organ and its health plays a vital role among the other sense organs. The skin concerns like acne breakout, psoriasis, or anything similar along the lines, finding a qualified and experienced dermatologist becomes paramount.
Top Travel Vaccinations in Manchester
Travel vaccination in Manchester offers comprehensive immunization services for individuals planning international trips. Expert healthcare providers administer vaccines tailored to your destination, ensuring you stay protected against various diseases. Conveniently located clinics and flexible appointment options make it easy to get the necessary shots before your journey. Stay healthy and travel with confidence by getting vaccinated in Manchester. Visit us: www.nxhealthcare.co.uk
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptx
Indication and installation of a mobile cervical disc prosthesis. Benefits of the PRODISC C VIVO mobile disc prosthesis (Centinel Spine)
Travel Clinic Cardiff: Health Advice for International Travelers
Travel Clinic Cardiff offers comprehensive travel health services, including vaccinations, travel advice, and preventive care for international travelers. Our expert team ensures you are well-prepared and protected for your journey, providing personalized consultations tailored to your destination. Conveniently located in Cardiff, we help you travel with confidence and peace of mind. Visit us: www.nxhealthcare.co.uk
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
une 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/Pt1nA32sdHQ
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/uFdc9F0rlP0
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
What is Obesity? How to overcome Obesity?
Obesity is a chronic complex disease defined by excessive fat deposits that can impair health.
Computer in pharmaceutical research and development-Mpharm(Pharmaceutics)
Statistics- Statistics is the science of collecting, organizing, presenting, analyzing and interpreting numerical data to assist in making more effective decisions.
A statistics is a measure which is used to estimate the population parameter
Parameters-It is used to describe the properties of an entire population.
Examples-Measures of central tendency Dispersion, Variance, Standard Deviation (SD), Absolute Error, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Eigen Value
Nutritional deficiency disorder in Child
Nutritional deficiency Disorder are problems in india.
It is very important to learn about Indian child's nutritional parameters as well the Disease related to alteration in their Nutrition.
acne vulgaris -Mpharm (2nd semester) Cosmetics and cosmeceuticals
cosmetics and cosmeceuticals
Muskan
mpharm
2nd semester
Guru Gobind Singh college of pharmacy, yamunanagar, haryana
Helminthiasis or Worm infestation in Children for Nursing students
Brief description worm infestation/Helminthiasis for Basic B.Sc Nursing students
Recently uploaded (20)
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis - Pathogenesis , Clinical Features & Manage...
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis - Pathogenesis , Clinical Features & Manage...
How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.
How to Control Your Asthma Tips by gokuldas hospital.
Call Girls In Mumbai +91-7426014248 High Profile Call Girl Mumbai
Call Girls In Mumbai +91-7426014248 High Profile Call Girl Mumbai
Tele Optometry (kunj'sppt) / Basics of tele optometry.
Tele Optometry (kunj'sppt) / Basics of tele optometry.
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
Medical Quiz ( Online Quiz for API Meet 2024 ).pdf
Travel Clinic Cardiff: Health Advice for International Travelers
Travel Clinic Cardiff: Health Advice for International Travelers
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
June 2024 Oncology Cartoons By Dr Kanhu Charan Patro
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Computer in pharmaceutical research and development-Mpharm(Pharmaceutics)
Computer in pharmaceutical research and development-Mpharm(Pharmaceutics)
acne vulgaris -Mpharm (2nd semester) Cosmetics and cosmeceuticals
acne vulgaris -Mpharm (2nd semester) Cosmetics and cosmeceuticals
Helminthiasis or Worm infestation in Children for Nursing students
Helminthiasis or Worm infestation in Children for Nursing students
Rtpcr
- 1. LABORATORY REPORT : P135665 : 23/11/2021 4:16 PM : 23/11/2021 4:30 PM : 24/11/2021 5 :36 PM : Patient ID Registered On Collected On Reported On External Id : C K Wasiq : V134271 : 22 Y/ M Name Visit No Age/Gender Ref By Aadhar Card DOB : Kalarikkal X ray, Ramanattukara : XXXX XXXX XXXX : DDMMYYYY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORT Test Name : COVID 19 SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR ICMR Registration Number: CARREFLABVKK SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction TEST RESULT SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE Specimen Type : Method : Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab RTPCR This Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test intended to use for the qualitative detection of a novel corona virus which was identified in 2019 at Wuhan City, Hubei province, China in upper respiratory tract specimens and lower respiratory tract specimens of infected people. Pathogen information : Corona viruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS -CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. Interpretation : A "POSITIVE" result indicates that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is present in the given sample and suggests the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Test result should always be considered in the context of patient's clinical history, physical examination, and epidemiologic exposures. A "NEGATIVE" result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is not present in the patient's given specimen. Result should be correlated with patient’s history and clinical presentation. However it does not rule out the infection completely and should not be used as the sole basis for making decisions related to treatment and other patient management decisions. A false negative may resulted due to inadequate number of organisms are present in the specimen due to improper collection, transport or handling Note: The results relate only to the specimens tested and should be correlated with clinical findings Interpretation guidance: 1. Testing of referred clinical specimens was considered on the basis of request/referral received from/ through state surveillance officer(SSO) of concerned State Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme / any other health care facility affirming requirements of the case definition/s 2.A single negative test result, particularly if this is from an upper respiratory tract specimen, does not exclude infection 3.A positive test result is only tentative, and will be reconfirmed by retesting. 4.Repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimen is strongly recommended in severe or progressive disease. The repeat specimens may be considered after a gap of 2-4 days after the collection of the first specimen for additional testing if required 5.A positive alternate pathogen does not necessarily rule out either, as little is yet known about the role of coinfections *** End of Report *** Page 1 of 1 Dr. Ronald A Roche MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist Dr. Reshmi Gopalakrishnan MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist