Rtpcr
•
0 likes•4 views
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 67-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test on the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The report provides information on the test method used, details on coronavirus and the implications of positive and negative test results. It concludes that the negative result should be considered in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Sooraj Govindan, a 31-year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and exposure risks, as a false negative is possible. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Aswanth M and tested for COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the evaluating microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 40-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on November 27, 2021 and reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal P V.
- The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not present in the sample.
- A negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The test was intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report explains that a negative result does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It also provides background information on corona viruses and the test method used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Mohammed Rameez M summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old male patient. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 46-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Recommended
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Sooraj Govindan, a 31-year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and exposure risks, as a false negative is possible. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Aswanth M and tested for COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the evaluating microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 40-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on November 27, 2021 and reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal P V.
- The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not present in the sample.
- A negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The test was intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report explains that a negative result does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It also provides background information on corona viruses and the test method used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Mohammed Rameez M summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 21-year-old male patient. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 46-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 46-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 44-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 37-year-old female patient named Nilufar Vanada with visit number V134275. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on December 31, 2021 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old male patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report also provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Mufeedh Ali Baramy, a 33-year-old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
A molecular biology report for a patient named Aboobackar B A describes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was reported as SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. Additional information provided includes details on specimen collection and testing methodology, the pathogen being tested for, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 48-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report also provides background information on coronaviruses and the test methodology used.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr 210906183229
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 53-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and interpretations for positive and negative test results which should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Thamam Shuhshad, a 34-year old male. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the results were negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report outlines details of the test including the specimen type tested, test method used, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes with the signatures of the consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 26-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample taken from the patient returned a negative result. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative test result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction methodology at the laboratory.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Abdul Janif B M and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 49-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative test results, and notes that repeat sampling may be needed for accurate results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) and found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's condition.
More Related Content
What's hot
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 46-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 44-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 37-year-old female patient named Nilufar Vanada with visit number V134275. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on December 31, 2021 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old male patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report also provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Mufeedh Ali Baramy, a 33-year-old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
A molecular biology report for a patient named Aboobackar B A describes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was reported as SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. Additional information provided includes details on specimen collection and testing methodology, the pathogen being tested for, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 48-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report also provides background information on coronaviruses and the test methodology used.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr 210906183229
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 53-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and interpretations for positive and negative test results which should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Thamam Shuhshad, a 34-year old male. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection using real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the results were negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report outlines details of the test including the specimen type tested, test method used, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes with the signatures of the consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 26-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample taken from the patient returned a negative result. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative test result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction methodology at the laboratory.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Abdul Janif B M and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 49-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative test results, and notes that repeat sampling may be needed for accurate results.
What's hot (20)
Similar to Rtpcr
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample using real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) and found to be negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results in the context of the patient's condition.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 41-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
1) The patient underwent COVID-19 testing via nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
2) The test results were negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen.
3) A negative test result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745
A COVID-19 test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from a 23-year-old male patient. The test was a Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) test, and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting test results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Mohammed Lisan Ali and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/10/2021 and reported on 21/10/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
1) A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
2) The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen.
3) A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 34-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not present in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 57-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the negative test result.
Rtpcr 21093004140
A molecular biology report for a patient named Farzaan Sayyah showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report explained that coronaviruses can cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases like MERS and SARS. A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample but does not rule out infection, and results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Thamam Shuhshad summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test results for a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen were negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and interpreting positive and negative test results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Nidhi Subhash shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 41-year-old female patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal P V.
- The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not present in the sample.
- A negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The test was intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19.
Rtpcr 210930041407
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Fathima Afreen, a 21-year old female patient, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper sample collection, transport, or handling. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 56-year-old male patient. The SARS-CoV-2 test result was negative, indicating that the coronavirus was not detected in the patient's nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR) method. The report provides information on the test performed, specimen details, interpretation of results, and is signed off by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Abdul Kader Arafath. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Similar to Rtpcr (19)
More from Care Reference Laboratory
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Certificate
This certificate confirms Saniya Bi Shaikh received two doses of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine. She received her first dose on August 3, 2021 from batch 4121Z088 and her second dose on October 30, 2021 from batch 4121Z105 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and contains contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Certificate
This certificate confirms that Saniya Bi Shaikh, an 18-year-old female, received the first dose of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine on July 3, 2021 and the second dose on September 30, 2021 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and lists contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a patient named Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR and was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample collected on April 2, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result for the patient identified as Mohammed Rameez M was negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted in the clinical context. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 04/02/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, testing method used, implications of positive and negative results, and notes that the results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Mohammed Ishak B A. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed on April 2, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 24-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, as the test has limitations. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the negative results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Nidhi Subash shows the results of a COVID-19 test. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Mohammed Rafeeq Marathanadi. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test. The test result was positive, indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A positive result suggests a diagnosis of COVID-19, though the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Ashthaf Ali C. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR analysis. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 56-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on January 24, 2022 and reported on January 24, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/12/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, the coronavirus tested for, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test. The test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient C K Wasiq was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Nidhi subash rtpcr
This document is a lab report for a COVID-19 RT-PCR test. It indicates that the test for the sample from Miss. Nidhi Subash, a 24-year-old female, came back negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The test was performed at Sankar's Healthcare Scans and Diagnostics in Alappuzha, Kerala, India and analyzed samples from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab using real-time RT-PCR. The report provides background on SARS-CoV-2 and the test methodology, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with clinical observations.
More from Care Reference Laboratory (20)
Recently uploaded
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Fallopian tube blockage may cause female infertility. For treatment, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can be a solution.
Acute Gout Care & Urate Lowering Therapy .pdf
In this document , the management of acute gout attacks and a description of urate lowering therapy is mentioned.
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Do you have abnormal smell after periods? It may be vaginitis. Do not worry, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can help you get a cure.
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Challenges associated with ageing from a public health perspective
Lecture 6 -- Memory 2015.pptlearning occurs when a stimulus (unconditioned st...
learning occurs when a stimulus (unconditioned stimulus) eliciting a response (unconditioned response) • is paired with another stimulus (conditioned stimulus)
What are the different types of Dental implants.
Are you looking for a long-lasting solution to your missing tooth?
Dental implants are the most common type of method for replacing the missing tooth. Unlike dentures or bridges, implants are surgically placed in the jawbone. In layman’s terms, a dental implant is similar to the natural root of the tooth. It offers a stable foundation for the artificial tooth giving it the look, feel, and function similar to the natural tooth.
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a simplified look into the mechanisms involved in the regulation of respiration:
Learning objectives:
1. Describe the organisation of respiratory center
2. Describe the nervous control of inspiration and respiratory rhythm
3. Describe the functions of the dorsal and respiratory groups of neurons
4. Describe the influences of the Pneumotaxic and Apneustic centers
5. Explain the role of Hering-Breur inflation reflex in regulation of inspiration
6. Explain the role of central chemoreceptors in regulation of respiration
7. Explain the role of peripheral chemoreceptors in regulation of respiration
8. Explain the regulation of respiration during exercise
9. Integrate the respiratory regulatory mechanisms
10. Describe the Cheyne-Stokes breathing
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 42, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 36, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
3. Chapter 13, Human Physiology by Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty ORSI 2024.pptx
Indication and installation of a mobile cervical disc prosthesis. Benefits of the PRODISC C VIVO mobile disc prosthesis (Centinel Spine)
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS)
Artificial Intelligence Symposium (THAIS). Parc Taulí. Sabadell
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...PVI, PeerView Institute for Medical Education
Co-Chairs, Val J. Lowe, MD, and Cyrus A. Raji, MD, PhD, prepared useful Practice Aids pertaining to Alzheimer’s disease for this CME/AAPA activity titled “Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neuroradiology in Diagnosis and Treatment.” For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, and complete CME/AAPA information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at https://bit.ly/3PvVY25. CME/AAPA credit will be available until June 28, 2025.LOW BIRTH WEIGHT. PRETERM BABIES OR SMALL FOR DATES BABIES
low birth weight presentation. Low birth weight (LBW) infant is defined as the one whose birth weight is less than 2500g irrespective of their gestational age. Premature birth and low birth weight(LBW) is still a serious problem in newborn. Causing high morbidity and mortality rate worldwide. The nursing care provide to low birth weight babies is crucial in promoting their overall health and development. Through careful assessment, diagnosis,, planning, and evaluation plays a vital role in ensuring these vulnerable infants receive the specialize care they need. In India every third of the infant weight less than 2500g.
Birth period, socioeconomical status, nutritional and intrauterine environment are the factors influencing low birth weight
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
- Video recording of this lecture in English language: https://youtu.be/Pt1nA32sdHQ
- Video recording of this lecture in Arabic language: https://youtu.be/uFdc9F0rlP0
- Link to download the book free: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/nephrotube-nephrology-books.html
- Link to NephroTube website: www.NephroTube.com
- Link to NephroTube social media accounts: https://nephrotube.blogspot.com/p/join-nephrotube-on-social-media.html
How to choose the best dermatologists in Indore.
The skin is the largest organ and its health plays a vital role among the other sense organs. The skin concerns like acne breakout, psoriasis, or anything similar along the lines, finding a qualified and experienced dermatologist becomes paramount.
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
Recently uploaded (20)
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Demystifying Fallopian Tube Blockage- Grading the Differences and Implication...
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Ageing, the Elderly, Gerontology and Public Health
Lecture 6 -- Memory 2015.pptlearning occurs when a stimulus (unconditioned st...
Lecture 6 -- Memory 2015.pptlearning occurs when a stimulus (unconditioned st...
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 6_Anti Malarial Drugs.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 6_Anti Malarial Drugs.pdf
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
The Nervous and Chemical Regulation of Respiration
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...
Alzheimer’s Disease Case Conference: Gearing Up for the Expanding Role of Neu...
LOW BIRTH WEIGHT. PRETERM BABIES OR SMALL FOR DATES BABIES
LOW BIRTH WEIGHT. PRETERM BABIES OR SMALL FOR DATES BABIES
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Hemodialysis: Chapter 5, Dialyzers Overview - Dr.Gawad
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Test bank for karp s cell and molecular biology 9th edition by gerald karp.pdf
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
Promoting Wellbeing - Applied Social Psychology - Psychology SuperNotes
Rtpcr
- 1. LABORATORY REPORT : P135667 : 27/11/2021 4:16 PM : 27/11/2021 4:32 PM : 28/11/2021 5 :36 PM : Patient ID Registered On Collected On Reported On External Id : Haridasan D : V134273 : 67 Y/ M Name Visit No Age/Gender Ref By Aadhar Card DOB : Kalarikkal X ray, Ramanattukara : 9016 8391 1918 : 07/05/1960 MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORT Test Name : COVID 19 SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR ICMR Registration Number: CARREFLABVKK SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction TEST RESULT SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE Specimen Type : Method : Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab RTPCR This Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test intended to use for the qualitative detection of a novel corona virus which was identified in 2019 at Wuhan City, Hubei province, China in upper respiratory tract specimens and lower respiratory tract specimens of infected people. Pathogen information : Corona viruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS -CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. Interpretation : A "POSITIVE" result indicates that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is present in the given sample and suggests the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Test result should always be considered in the context of patient's clinical history, physical examination, and epidemiologic exposures. A "NEGATIVE" result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is not present in the patient's given specimen. Result should be correlated with patient’s history and clinical presentation. However it does not rule out the infection completely and should not be used as the sole basis for making decisions related to treatment and other patient management decisions. A false negative may resulted due to inadequate number of organisms are present in the specimen due to improper collection, transport or handling Note: The results relate only to the specimens tested and should be correlated with clinical findings Interpretation guidance: 1. Testing of referred clinical specimens was considered on the basis of request/referral received from/ through state surveillance officer(SSO) of concerned State Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme / any other health care facility affirming requirements of the case definition/s 2.A single negative test result, particularly if this is from an upper respiratory tract specimen, does not exclude infection 3.A positive test result is only tentative, and will be reconfirmed by retesting. 4.Repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimen is strongly recommended in severe or progressive disease. The repeat specimens may be considered after a gap of 2-4 days after the collection of the first specimen for additional testing if required 5.A positive alternate pathogen does not necessarily rule out either, as little is yet known about the role of coinfections *** End of Report *** Page 1 of 1 Dr. Ronald A Roche MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist Dr. Reshmi Gopalakrishnan MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist