1. G.L BAJAJ INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH
APPROVED BY AICTE, MINISTRY OF HRD, GOVT. OF INDIA
TEAM MEMBERS ROLL NO.
Pardeep Suhag GM18144
Priya Garg GM18159
Shobha Pramanick GM18163
Ranjay Kumar GM18176
Piyush Rai Saxena GM18148
Priyanka Mohanty GM18162
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF :
Dr. Arvind Bhatt
2.
3. The Apprentices Act - 1961
The Payment of Wages Act -1936
The Workmens’ Compensation Act -1923
The Factories Act -1948
The Industrial Disputes Act - 1947
The Employees PF & MP Act - 1952
The Employees State Insurance Act - 1948
The Maternity Benefit Act - 1961
The Payment of Bonus Act - 1965
The Payment of Gratuity Act - 1972
4. (1) Improves industrial relation i.e. employee-employer relations and minimizes
industrial disputes.
(2)Prospects workers form exploitation by the employers or management
(3)Helps workers in getting fair wages
(4)Minimizes labour unrest
(5)Reduces conflicts and strikes etc.
(6)Ensures job security for workers
(7)Promotes welcome environment conditions in the industrialsystem
(8)Fixes rest pauses and work hours etc.
(9)Provides compensation to workers, who are victims of accidents.
5.
6. Fair Wages
Equal Opportunity
Protecting Children
Protecting the Disabled
Working Hours
7. • Protection from Discrimination
• Compensation
• Labor Unions
• Creating a Union
9. The ILO has four strategic objectives:
• Promote and realize standards and fundamental
principles and rights at work
• Create greater opportunities for women and men to decent
employment and income
• Enhance the coverage and effectiveness of social
protection for all
• Strengthen tripartism and social dialogue
10. The Act shall apply to:
every establishment which is a factory
engaged in any industry mentioned in
schedule I of the Act and
employing 20 or more persons or
any other establishment employing twenty or
more persons or
such other establishment as the Central
Government may notify.
The Employee’s Provident Funds Act, 1952
11. The Right to Information emerges out of the umbrella of
Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression and Right to
Life.
Right to Information is also the centrifugal point for
access to myriad other basic human rights such as
environment, health, food, livelihood etc.
The most direct transformation that the right to
information effects is in the governance system.
From the perspective of citizenship, right to
information is the primary tool in the hands of the
citizen.
12. • Provides a legal framework of citizens
democratic right to access to information
under the control of public authorities
• To promote transparency and accountability
in the functioning of every public authority
13. “Public Authority” means any authority or body or
institution established or constituted.
By or under the constitution.
By any other law made by Parliament.
By any other law made by State Legislature.
By notification issued or order made by the appropriate government and
includes any
i) Body owned, controlled or substantially financed.
ii) Non - Government organization substantially financed directly or
indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate Government;
15. – Promote openness, transparency and accountability in the working of every
public authority.
– Reduce Corruption
– Prevent administrative arbitrariness
– Bride the gap between providers and recipient of public
services
– Make citizens part of decision making
– Make administrative responsive
– Strengthen the foundations of democracy
TO
16. Application fee Rs. 10/.
If information is required in electronic media – floppy /CD, etc additional
charges will be applicable.
Photocopy charges of Rs. 2/- per page.
Inspection charges of relevant files, documents and records –
•No fee for first hour of inspection.
• Rs. 5/- for every subsequent hour or fraction thereof.
Processing expenses incurred by the Public Information officer to be intimated
in writing.
Applicant can seek review of the decision on fees charged by the PIO by
applying to the appropriate Appellate Authority.
No fees from people living below the poverty line.
Free of cost if the PIO fails to comply within the time limit as prescribed under
the RTI Act.
17. 30 days if application is filed with the PIO.
35 days in case it is filed with the Assistant PIO.
48 hours in case the matter to which the information pertains
affects the life and liberty of an individual.
18. (a) National security
(b) Contempt of court
(c) Parliamentary privilege
(d) Trade secrecy
(e) Fiduciary relationship
(f) Foreign government
(g) Safety of informer in law enforcement
(h) Investigation
(i) Cabinet papers
(j) Privacy
(K) Copyright - disclosure which would involve an infringement of
copyright subsisting in a person other than the State may be rejected.
[Section 9]
19. Anita has enrolled for the P.G. Diploma in management offered by XPDMI
Institute affiliated to a University, which receives funds from the University
Grants Commission. The final examination for the students in their second
year is conducted by the University, even though the mid-term exams are the
responsibility of the Institute - which is a privately funded entity. The institute
has to submit all relevant records about the mid-term examinations to the
University. Anita wants to know about the norms laid down for evaluating the
answer sheets of one of her mid-term examination papers and submits an RTI
application to the Principal. The Management tells her that the Institute is a
private entity and is not bound by RTI Act, 2005.
A friend suggests that she should apply to the PIO of the University and that
there is a chance that she might get the relevant information. The friend also
suggests that she should first find out if the information she is looking for is
disclosed proactively by the University.
RTI
20. Question (a): Is Anita's friend's advice correct? What provisions of the RTI Act, 2005
apply?
(b): Can the PIO reject Anita`s application on the grounds that even though the
information is held by the University, it cannot be given since it pertains to a private
entity?