This document discusses the important considerations for filling federal judge positions in the United States. It argues that candidates should have strong academic qualifications, integrity, and experience applying the constitution as written. They should also demonstrate sound judicial temperament and not have any political or personal biases. The candidate's education background, past rulings, judicial philosophy, political stances, and personal history should all be carefully considered to ensure they are well-qualified and able to fairly and impartially serve the American people in this important role.
5Week 3 – Reflection Paper Reflection Paper .docxalinainglis
5
Week 3 – Reflection Paper
Reflection Paper #3
Business Law
This week’s agenda reviewed the topics of how our judicial system works hand in hand with philosophy and legal interpretation. First and foremost, the podcast that reviews Judicial Philosophy in Legal Interpretation at the Supreme Court, talks about how those who work with and for the law make the choices and decisions they make and why. They have addressed how police officers, supreme court justices, and even judges evaluate the law and interpret the written law and reprimand or investigate certain situations based not only on mandated law, but they also use personal beliefs and experiences to make legal choices. It distinguishes how these justices may vote for and with the written law and the court system rather than their own beliefs and philosophy. There are many supreme court justices that are acting on behalf of the supreme court for 30 years, or what is considered a lifetime. When this occurs the law and supreme court views and dispositions do not change, the influences on the court hardly differ. The only way to change the beliefs of this supreme court committee is to enact a law, which could be constitutional, only allowing these justices to be involved for a max of 18 years. This then suggests that every other year a justice will retire thus changing the ideals, beliefs, and philosophical ideologies of those who are making choices on behalf of the law. Professor Ward Farnsworth had commented on a particular situation that I found very interesting; the situation was about a young man who was in an area known for illegal activity, the young man then began running as soon as he noticed the police officers. The police officers then had to determine, based off of previous experiences if the young man was running because he was hiding something, had done something illegal, or was in fact scared. Host Dan Rae had then mentioned that maybe the young man had grown up in an environment that led him to fear law enforcement, and he began running whether or not he had in fact done anything wrong. As Professor Ward then stated that the police officers experience may have been that individuals who run from law enforcement typically have done something they shouldn’t. You now have two very different perspectives and only life experience combined with the law can determine what actions to take.
In the case of George W. Bush vs Al Gore, the same principles have applied. When the state court systems approved the recount of the votes in various counties the supreme court then reviewed the case and decided that under the fourteenth amendment, the Equal Protection Clause, back down to the state level and the state of Florida felt as though they had no choice but to dismiss the case for a recount of the votes. It was determined that the actions that took place during this election in the state of Florida left many individuals feeling as though there were politics invo.
Example Of The Short Version Of Judicial Activism
Essay on The Role of the Judiciary
Judicial Activism: The Wade V. Roe Case
Judicial Restraint Vs. Judicial Activism
Judicial Activism Vs. Judicial Restraint
Judicial Restraint Analysis
Judicial Activism And Judicial Restraint
Judicial Restraint Essay
Judicial Activism In Canada
Judicial Restraint Vs Judicial Activism
Judicial Restraint/Activism Essay
High Level Of Judicial Activism
Judicial Injustice: A Case Of Judicial Activism
Judicial Activism In American Society
Judicial Activism Research Paper
Judicial Activism
Advantages Of Judicial Activism
Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Essay
Please answer the following questions belowDistinguish between .docxrandymartin91030
Please answer the following questions below:
Distinguish between the terms actus reus and mens rea. How are they significant in criminal law?
Define how concurrence works with actus reus and mens rea to lead to criminal liability. Why is concurrence so significant?
Which of the three legal requirements listed above (i.e., actus reus, mens rea, or concurrence) is more difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a trial?
THIS ASSIGNMENT IS COMPLETED ABOVE, YOUR NEXT ASSIGNMENT IS TO:
Respond to at least two of your classmates post. Ensure that you and your classmates fully comprehend the difficulties of proving someone’s intent and coordinating the act and the intent to create a prosecutable, criminal offense. EACH STUDENT FEEDBACK MUST BE 200 WORDS EACH (TOTAL OF 2 STUDENTS FEEDBACKS).
ANY OUTSIDE SOURCES MUST BE PROPERLY CITED IN APA FORM…Remember; do not merely agree with your classmates without additional information. A substantive response advances the discussion in a meaningful way; merely agreeing with your classmates is not a substantive response….
FIRST STUDENT RESPONSE FROM Cameron Blanchard
Distinguish between the terms actus reus and mens rea. How are they significant in criminal law?
Actus reus – a Latin term, “the guilty act”. Proper identification of the act is often the most difficult. (Wright, R., 2013). A judge or jury has to determine what specific acts were prohibited by the statue and if the defendant engaged in those specified acts.
Mens rea – examines the person’s mental ability, state of mind once a crime has been committed. Once, Mens rea has occurred, the prosecution is liable to prove without admissible evidence that criminal intent was exemplified in order to convict the defendant.
The significance of Actus reus and Mens rea in criminal law is based on the difference of crime and the conviction or being not guilty once proof of either act is attained.
Define how concurrence works with actus reus and mens rea to lead to criminal liability. Why is concurrence so significant?
Concurrence works with Actus reus and Mens rea to lead to criminal liability to determine the order the crime occurred. For example, my neighbor was at a local park in 2009 playing basketball, had a few altercations with some neighborhood kids. While at the park playing basketball, the opposing dudes passed twice and the third time they passed, the driver stopped and went on the court and shot him 6 times in the back. He seen my neighbor turn and run away when he heard the first shot not paying attention that the bullet hit him and the shooter ran behind him and continued to shot. In Louisiana shooting someone constantly or being present at the scene and to leave and come back to the location is considered pre-mediation murder, preplanned.
Which of the three legal requirements listed above (i.e., actus reus, mens rea, or concurrence) is more difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a trial?
In most cases, I would have to say t.
PSM 451 PAD 581MaynardMoody, Ch. 1-2Dealing with.docxamrit47
PSM 451/ PAD 581
Maynard/Moody, Ch. 1-2
Dealing with Faces
Expectation of law abidance: demand that
street-level workers apply laws, rules, and
administrative procedures to people’s behavior
Prevalence of cultural abidance: workers’
subjective judgment of who people are, their
perceived identities and moral character, often
based on superficial social markers (race/ethnic,
gender, religious garb/practices etc.)
Tension between law and cultural abidance
affect street level workers’ decision-making
Street-level workers’ belief/value system often
come into conflict with organizational rules and
policies on the administration of public services
Discretionary Decision-making
State-agent narrative: democratic state built on law
and predictable procedures that treat like cases the
same
Deviations allowed only if law adapted to
circumstances in manner consistent with policy
Structure of public administration designed to
circumscribe discretion in order to insure equal
treatment as much as possible
Most egregious instances of cultural abidance draw
media/scholarly scrutiny
E.g. racial profiling seen as eroding legitimacy and authority of
governance in general and law enforcement in particular
Discretionary Decision-making
State-agent narrative: democratic state built on law
and predictable procedures that treat like cases the
same
Deviations allowed only if law adapted to
circumstances in manner consistent with policy
Structure of public administration designed to
circumscribe discretion in order to insure equal
treatment as much as possible
Most egregious instances of cultural abidance draw
media/scholarly scrutiny
E.g. racial profiling seen as eroding legitimacy and authority of
governance in general and law enforcement in particular
Citizen-agent narrative
Citizen-agent narrative: focuses on worker’s
judgments about identities and moral character of
clients and their behavior during encounters
Street-level workers take risk to provide unauthorized,
extraordinary assistance, or to administer services by
the book, or to withhold or provide services in an
abusive manner
Street-level cultural judgments are inevitably part of
governing the modern state
“every application of a law involves further elaboration of that
law” H. George Frederickson
Accountability and control are fundamental to traditional view
of administrative state
State-agent narrative
Concerned with law abidance of citizens
and workers
Identifying of worthy and unworthy
colleagues and citizens e.g. police
solidarity
Workers unsure of how to act when
views of worthiness, fairness, and
appropriate actions and laws, rules, and
policies don’t coincide
Politics & Administration
Role of street-level workers in administering
public policy raises classic question of their
influence in shaping policy and in essence
governing
Many scholars reject separation between politics
and administration
Implementation theory: gap between ...
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docxrtodd599
Running Head: William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Parties
William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Facts
William Jefferson Clinton, the defendant, was elected President of the United States in 1992. In 1991, William Jefferson Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas. In 1991, Paula Corbin Jones was an employee of the Arkansas Industrial Development Commission. The defendant attended a conference that year at a hotel staffed by the plaintiff. Jones claims that she was summoned by Danny Fergson, a state trooper, to go to the Defendant’s suite. Jones claims that while in that room the defendant made sexual advances toward her which she rejected. She also claims that her supervisors consequently changed her duties and treated her unfairly because she rejected the defendant’s sexual advances. Plaintiff Paula Jones filed a civil action against defendant (sitting) President Bill Clinton, alleging that he made “abhorrent” sexual advances. She sought $75,000 in actual damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. Defendant Clinton sought to dismiss the claim on the ground of presidential immunity, or, alternatively, to delay the proceedings until his term of office had expired.
Procedure
The district court denied the motion to dismiss and ordered discovery to proceed, but it also ordered that the trial be stayed until the end of Clinton’s term. The court of appeals affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss and reversed the stay of the trial. President Clinton appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Issue
Does the President have immunity from all suits against him while he occupies the office?
Explain the applicable law(s)
The doctrine of separation of powers calls for Congress, the legislative branch, to enact legislation and appropriate funds. The president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces and is also charged with ensuring that the laws are faithfully executed. The judicial branch is charged with interpreting the laws in the course of applying them to particular disputes. No member of one branch owes his or her tenure in that position to a member of any other branch; no branch can encroach on the power of another. This system is often referred to as being a system of checks and balances; that is, the powers given to each branch operate to keep the other branches from being able to seize enough power to dominate the government (Kubasek, ch.5, pg. 107).
The first charges that petitioner, acting under color of state law, deprived her of rights protected by the Constitution, in violation of Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The second charges that petitioner and Ferguson engaged in a conspiracy to violate her federal rights, also actionable under federal law. See Rev. Stat. §1980, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (Cornell Law).
Holding
The Constitution does not protect the President from federal civil litigation involving actions committed before entering office. There is no requirement to stay the case until the President leaves office. In.
5Week 3 – Reflection Paper Reflection Paper .docxalinainglis
5
Week 3 – Reflection Paper
Reflection Paper #3
Business Law
This week’s agenda reviewed the topics of how our judicial system works hand in hand with philosophy and legal interpretation. First and foremost, the podcast that reviews Judicial Philosophy in Legal Interpretation at the Supreme Court, talks about how those who work with and for the law make the choices and decisions they make and why. They have addressed how police officers, supreme court justices, and even judges evaluate the law and interpret the written law and reprimand or investigate certain situations based not only on mandated law, but they also use personal beliefs and experiences to make legal choices. It distinguishes how these justices may vote for and with the written law and the court system rather than their own beliefs and philosophy. There are many supreme court justices that are acting on behalf of the supreme court for 30 years, or what is considered a lifetime. When this occurs the law and supreme court views and dispositions do not change, the influences on the court hardly differ. The only way to change the beliefs of this supreme court committee is to enact a law, which could be constitutional, only allowing these justices to be involved for a max of 18 years. This then suggests that every other year a justice will retire thus changing the ideals, beliefs, and philosophical ideologies of those who are making choices on behalf of the law. Professor Ward Farnsworth had commented on a particular situation that I found very interesting; the situation was about a young man who was in an area known for illegal activity, the young man then began running as soon as he noticed the police officers. The police officers then had to determine, based off of previous experiences if the young man was running because he was hiding something, had done something illegal, or was in fact scared. Host Dan Rae had then mentioned that maybe the young man had grown up in an environment that led him to fear law enforcement, and he began running whether or not he had in fact done anything wrong. As Professor Ward then stated that the police officers experience may have been that individuals who run from law enforcement typically have done something they shouldn’t. You now have two very different perspectives and only life experience combined with the law can determine what actions to take.
In the case of George W. Bush vs Al Gore, the same principles have applied. When the state court systems approved the recount of the votes in various counties the supreme court then reviewed the case and decided that under the fourteenth amendment, the Equal Protection Clause, back down to the state level and the state of Florida felt as though they had no choice but to dismiss the case for a recount of the votes. It was determined that the actions that took place during this election in the state of Florida left many individuals feeling as though there were politics invo.
Example Of The Short Version Of Judicial Activism
Essay on The Role of the Judiciary
Judicial Activism: The Wade V. Roe Case
Judicial Restraint Vs. Judicial Activism
Judicial Activism Vs. Judicial Restraint
Judicial Restraint Analysis
Judicial Activism And Judicial Restraint
Judicial Restraint Essay
Judicial Activism In Canada
Judicial Restraint Vs Judicial Activism
Judicial Restraint/Activism Essay
High Level Of Judicial Activism
Judicial Injustice: A Case Of Judicial Activism
Judicial Activism In American Society
Judicial Activism Research Paper
Judicial Activism
Advantages Of Judicial Activism
Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint Essay
Please answer the following questions belowDistinguish between .docxrandymartin91030
Please answer the following questions below:
Distinguish between the terms actus reus and mens rea. How are they significant in criminal law?
Define how concurrence works with actus reus and mens rea to lead to criminal liability. Why is concurrence so significant?
Which of the three legal requirements listed above (i.e., actus reus, mens rea, or concurrence) is more difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a trial?
THIS ASSIGNMENT IS COMPLETED ABOVE, YOUR NEXT ASSIGNMENT IS TO:
Respond to at least two of your classmates post. Ensure that you and your classmates fully comprehend the difficulties of proving someone’s intent and coordinating the act and the intent to create a prosecutable, criminal offense. EACH STUDENT FEEDBACK MUST BE 200 WORDS EACH (TOTAL OF 2 STUDENTS FEEDBACKS).
ANY OUTSIDE SOURCES MUST BE PROPERLY CITED IN APA FORM…Remember; do not merely agree with your classmates without additional information. A substantive response advances the discussion in a meaningful way; merely agreeing with your classmates is not a substantive response….
FIRST STUDENT RESPONSE FROM Cameron Blanchard
Distinguish between the terms actus reus and mens rea. How are they significant in criminal law?
Actus reus – a Latin term, “the guilty act”. Proper identification of the act is often the most difficult. (Wright, R., 2013). A judge or jury has to determine what specific acts were prohibited by the statue and if the defendant engaged in those specified acts.
Mens rea – examines the person’s mental ability, state of mind once a crime has been committed. Once, Mens rea has occurred, the prosecution is liable to prove without admissible evidence that criminal intent was exemplified in order to convict the defendant.
The significance of Actus reus and Mens rea in criminal law is based on the difference of crime and the conviction or being not guilty once proof of either act is attained.
Define how concurrence works with actus reus and mens rea to lead to criminal liability. Why is concurrence so significant?
Concurrence works with Actus reus and Mens rea to lead to criminal liability to determine the order the crime occurred. For example, my neighbor was at a local park in 2009 playing basketball, had a few altercations with some neighborhood kids. While at the park playing basketball, the opposing dudes passed twice and the third time they passed, the driver stopped and went on the court and shot him 6 times in the back. He seen my neighbor turn and run away when he heard the first shot not paying attention that the bullet hit him and the shooter ran behind him and continued to shot. In Louisiana shooting someone constantly or being present at the scene and to leave and come back to the location is considered pre-mediation murder, preplanned.
Which of the three legal requirements listed above (i.e., actus reus, mens rea, or concurrence) is more difficult to prove beyond a reasonable doubt in a trial?
In most cases, I would have to say t.
PSM 451 PAD 581MaynardMoody, Ch. 1-2Dealing with.docxamrit47
PSM 451/ PAD 581
Maynard/Moody, Ch. 1-2
Dealing with Faces
Expectation of law abidance: demand that
street-level workers apply laws, rules, and
administrative procedures to people’s behavior
Prevalence of cultural abidance: workers’
subjective judgment of who people are, their
perceived identities and moral character, often
based on superficial social markers (race/ethnic,
gender, religious garb/practices etc.)
Tension between law and cultural abidance
affect street level workers’ decision-making
Street-level workers’ belief/value system often
come into conflict with organizational rules and
policies on the administration of public services
Discretionary Decision-making
State-agent narrative: democratic state built on law
and predictable procedures that treat like cases the
same
Deviations allowed only if law adapted to
circumstances in manner consistent with policy
Structure of public administration designed to
circumscribe discretion in order to insure equal
treatment as much as possible
Most egregious instances of cultural abidance draw
media/scholarly scrutiny
E.g. racial profiling seen as eroding legitimacy and authority of
governance in general and law enforcement in particular
Discretionary Decision-making
State-agent narrative: democratic state built on law
and predictable procedures that treat like cases the
same
Deviations allowed only if law adapted to
circumstances in manner consistent with policy
Structure of public administration designed to
circumscribe discretion in order to insure equal
treatment as much as possible
Most egregious instances of cultural abidance draw
media/scholarly scrutiny
E.g. racial profiling seen as eroding legitimacy and authority of
governance in general and law enforcement in particular
Citizen-agent narrative
Citizen-agent narrative: focuses on worker’s
judgments about identities and moral character of
clients and their behavior during encounters
Street-level workers take risk to provide unauthorized,
extraordinary assistance, or to administer services by
the book, or to withhold or provide services in an
abusive manner
Street-level cultural judgments are inevitably part of
governing the modern state
“every application of a law involves further elaboration of that
law” H. George Frederickson
Accountability and control are fundamental to traditional view
of administrative state
State-agent narrative
Concerned with law abidance of citizens
and workers
Identifying of worthy and unworthy
colleagues and citizens e.g. police
solidarity
Workers unsure of how to act when
views of worthiness, fairness, and
appropriate actions and laws, rules, and
policies don’t coincide
Politics & Administration
Role of street-level workers in administering
public policy raises classic question of their
influence in shaping policy and in essence
governing
Many scholars reject separation between politics
and administration
Implementation theory: gap between ...
Running Head William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin JonesP.docxrtodd599
Running Head: William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Parties
William Jefferson Clinton v. Paula Corbin Jones
Facts
William Jefferson Clinton, the defendant, was elected President of the United States in 1992. In 1991, William Jefferson Clinton was the Governor of Arkansas. In 1991, Paula Corbin Jones was an employee of the Arkansas Industrial Development Commission. The defendant attended a conference that year at a hotel staffed by the plaintiff. Jones claims that she was summoned by Danny Fergson, a state trooper, to go to the Defendant’s suite. Jones claims that while in that room the defendant made sexual advances toward her which she rejected. She also claims that her supervisors consequently changed her duties and treated her unfairly because she rejected the defendant’s sexual advances. Plaintiff Paula Jones filed a civil action against defendant (sitting) President Bill Clinton, alleging that he made “abhorrent” sexual advances. She sought $75,000 in actual damages and $100,000 in punitive damages. Defendant Clinton sought to dismiss the claim on the ground of presidential immunity, or, alternatively, to delay the proceedings until his term of office had expired.
Procedure
The district court denied the motion to dismiss and ordered discovery to proceed, but it also ordered that the trial be stayed until the end of Clinton’s term. The court of appeals affirmed the denial of the motion to dismiss and reversed the stay of the trial. President Clinton appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Issue
Does the President have immunity from all suits against him while he occupies the office?
Explain the applicable law(s)
The doctrine of separation of powers calls for Congress, the legislative branch, to enact legislation and appropriate funds. The president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces and is also charged with ensuring that the laws are faithfully executed. The judicial branch is charged with interpreting the laws in the course of applying them to particular disputes. No member of one branch owes his or her tenure in that position to a member of any other branch; no branch can encroach on the power of another. This system is often referred to as being a system of checks and balances; that is, the powers given to each branch operate to keep the other branches from being able to seize enough power to dominate the government (Kubasek, ch.5, pg. 107).
The first charges that petitioner, acting under color of state law, deprived her of rights protected by the Constitution, in violation of Rev. Stat. §1979, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The second charges that petitioner and Ferguson engaged in a conspiracy to violate her federal rights, also actionable under federal law. See Rev. Stat. §1980, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (Cornell Law).
Holding
The Constitution does not protect the President from federal civil litigation involving actions committed before entering office. There is no requirement to stay the case until the President leaves office. In.
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
1. Surname 1
Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Subject
DD Month YYYY
Federal Judgment Appointment
What should be the most important considerations when filling judge positions at the federal
level? Why?
Contacts for help:dorineadalyn@gmail.com
A Federal judge serves in the federal courts in the United States in courts of appeal,
district courts, and the United States Courts of International Trade. This term refers to Article III
on federal judges and Article I federal magistrates who serve as magistrate judges. The United
State constitution provides that the procedure for the nomination of the federal judges is done by
the president and is confirmed by the president. A federal court’s judge is an important position
that carries significant responsibility and authority in the United States. Thus, given that US
judges are appointed to serve for life, the process of appointment is often set at a high bar. This
essay aims to analyze the significant considerations when one is filling a federal position.
The United States constitution does not set forth the qualification for one to be a federal
judge; however, a federal judge aspirant must qualify as an attorney despite the fact that this is
not a requirement. Without such qualifications, a judge may not be lucky to win confirmation by
the senate. To qualify as a federal judge, one must have academic qualifications and good
2. Surname 2
integrity to apply the constitution as it is written and as required by the Framers at the time of
ratification (Gresham 1). In this sense, such a judge will be ready to serve the United States
citizens all the time, without any political or personal bias. Having these exemplary
qualifications for this critical job will guarantee and demonstrate in-depth knowledge and fidelity
of the constitutions as written. Still, such a judge will have a better understanding of the
Americans' history, needs, and intellectual capacity to separate their duty from their personal
opinions and biases. When such a judge fails to meet the obligation in their duty, their action will
be disenfranchising and harming millions of United States citizens who will be denied their
rights and protection under the constitution.
One must have more than just a law degree to qualify as a federal judge. This is proof
that they have more academic experience, which will authenticate their judgment decisions. The
American Bar Association must endorse a candidate. The prospective federal judge must have a
legal profession supported with outstanding legal ability, breadth of experience, and a good
reputation for integrity. Moreover, such candidates must demonstrate sound judicial
temperament (Center for America Progress 2). During the federal judiciary reviews, the
candidate’s competence, temperance, integrity, and experience must be considered. Often,
twelve years’ experience is the American Bar Association endorsement requirement for one to
qualify as a federal judge (Krutz 500-513). Besides the academic qualifications, past rulings will
be a significant aspect to check for one to qualify as a federal judge. This is a factor that shows
their experience and gauges their performance.
The candidate’s political activity will be taken into consideration. For one to be appointed
a federal judge, their political philosophy, especially regarding previous decisions they have
issued, is critical given that federal judges' decisions affect many people. A candidate's judicial
3. Surname 3
philosophy, which can either be activists or constructivist/ textualist, can impact the judgment
they make because the purpose they are set to serve requires absolutes exactness without bias. It
is up to the federal judge candidate to provide information on how they will approach certain
issues to qualify as a federal judge. The candidate’s stance on certain critical issues in the
republic must be taken into consideration. A candidate’s personal life will be considered; such
will entail their tax compliance, criminal history, and professional reputation. A candidate with
positive personal life history qualifies because these qualifications support their integrity to the
nature of work they are set to do.
Federal judges are important to figures because their judgment affect people’s life.
Considering their critical responsibilities, the process and qualification process must be taken
with absolutes seriousness it deserves. A federal judges’ integrity, exemplary educational
backgrounds, temperament, political stance, judicial philosophy, and other critical qualification
criteria are integral for a candidate to qualify as a federal judge.
4. Surname 4
Works Cited
Center for American Progress. “Federal Judicial Nominations” 9 Steps from Vacancy to
Confirmation”. Legal Process. Vol. 1. (2013). P. 3. Retrieved from
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/general/news/2013/01/29/50996/federal-
judicial-nominations-9-steps-from-vacancy-to-confirmation/
Gresham, Tom. “Qualification to become a federal Judge." Chron. (2018). P.1
Retrieved from https://work.chron.com/qualifications-become-federal-judge-
14255.html
Krutz, Glen. “American Government 2e. Rice University”. Openstax. (2019). Pp.500-513.
Retrieved from: https://d3bxy9euw4e147.cloudfront.net/oscms-
prodcms/media/documents/AmericanGovernment2e-OP.pdf
