Rohde Transnational Social Activist Communities

Technologies within
Transnational Social Activist Communities

An Ethnographic Study of the European Social Forum

Saqib Saeed, Markus Rohde, Volker Wulf
Department of Information Systems and New Media
University of Siegen, Hölderlinstr 3, 57076 Siegen, Germany

Information Systems and New Media C&T2009, July 25
Prof. Dr. Volker Wulf

Organizational Field of Application

Transnational networks of civil society organizations
(CSOs), groups, movements and activists
Loosely connected
Volunteer-based
Cultural and language diversity
Limited financial and human resources
Adhoc-setup, lacking well-organized and institutionalized
structures


R&D Objective

Help to design appropriate technological support for
transnational CSO networks


Research Questions

What requirements do CSO networks address to
technological support?
How do transnational CSO networks interact with
technology?
How is their technological infrastructure developed
and appropriated?
What are the main problems that transnational CSO
networks face with regard to computer-mediated
communication/cooperation?


Research Program

Understand the social practice of transnational CSO
networking
Understand the state of the art of technological
infrastructure
Derive design requirements
Develop prototypes
Evaluate use of prototypes in the social practice
Re-design if necessary


Social Forums
World Social Forum (WSF) process:
initiated in 2001 as a counterpart to the World Economic
Forum
The largest communication space for the alter-globalization
movement (for global justice)
„Another world is possible!“
Local, national, regional, global forums with independent
organizing processes
networks of NGOs, labour organizations, trade unions, social
movements and grass-roots activists
Non-hierarchical structures, absence of central leadership and
well-organized institutions
Decision-making by consensus


History of Social Forums
9 Annual World Social Forum (WSF) Events
Central locations, policentric events, global call for action
Between 12,000 to 155,000 attendees, thousands
organizations, more than 130 countries
5 (Bi-) Annual European Social Forum (ESF) Events since 2002
Central locations st
1 European Social Forum
Up to 60,000 attendees, Florence, Italy 2002

hundreds of participating nd
Paris, France 2003
organizations
5th European Social Forum, rd
London, UK 2004
17th-21st September 2008
(ESF 2008) in Malmo, Sweden th
Athens, Greece 2006
13,000 participants
5th European Social Forum
Malmo, Sweden 2008


Social Forums: Field of Application
Social Forums: Events and Organizations/Committees

World Social Regional SF: National SF: City/District
Forum Social Forums
European, German, Italian,
African, Asian, Indian, United State/Provincial
American etc. States etc. Social Forums
Social Forums Social Forums
Thematic
Social Forums

Self-organize and participate

Activists
local
and Individuals Groups Organizations Networks Movements
regional
Networks national
international


Social Forums: Field of Application
Social Forums: Events and Organizations

World Social Regional SF: National SF: City/District
Forum Social Forums
European, German, Italian,
African, Asian, Indian, United State/Provincial
American etc. States etc. Social Forums
Social Forums Social Forums
Thematic
Social Forums

Self-organize and participate

Activists
local
and Individuals Groups Organizations Networks Movements
regional
Networks national
international


Organizing Structure of ESF 2008

•European Preparatory Assembley (EPA)
•Babels(volunteering interpreters)
•Web-Team (volunteers for IT mangement)
•Networks (specialized thematic groups)

•Nordic Organizing Committe (NOC)
•139 member organizations
•11 Working Groups
•Board (financial matters)
•Office
•Coordination Group


Organizing Structure of ESF 2008

NOC
Babels
EPA
139 Member Organizations
Coor-
Board Office dination
Group
Experts

Net-
ALIS
Program works
Fundraising
11 Working Groups Demonstration
Information Web-
Culture Team
Logistics
Mobilization
Volunteers
Interpretations
Contact Group for
Europe & the World


Technological Infrastructure

Central Website (official information)
Event Website (event information)
OpenESF Website (Collaborative tool, Project Workspaces,
Wikis, Mailing lists)
Mailing lists (communication at the European level)

Self-organized resources (volunteers/activists/participants):
MySpace
Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
… etc.


ESF Website

Central Website
(official information)


Event Website ESF 2008

Event Website
(official information on
the recent ESF event)


Open ESF platform

Open ESF
(communication platform)


Research Methods

Participant Observations at EPA/NOC meetings
(Berlin, Malmo)
Online Skype Meetings (3)
Semi-structured interviews (14)
4 members of the organizing committee (NOC)
4 members of the “web-team”
4 social activists who organized workshops
2 social activists who attended the event
Analysis of Websites and Mailing Lists


Development of the Event Website

2008 Event Website (Registration of activities, Merging,
Event information, Publishing the Program, Storing outcomes)
Company volunteering to develop the website
Previous website (2006 event) was developed using Plone
and the company developers were not familiar with Plone, so
they started from the scratch
Problems with the software company
Communication problems, requirements, limited resources
Thus, the 2008 Event Website was developed by extending
the previous forum (2006) website by a hired developer from
the web-team


Selection of Themes
From Sept. to Nov. 2007 there were collected 70
suggestions for thematic initiatives through the event
website
NOC combined these suggestions in 7 thematic
clusters/categories
EPA meeting in November 2007 in Istanbul (Turkey)
rejected these categories
Discussion at the EPA meeting in January 2008 in
Paris and February 2008 in Berlin
Nine themes finalized
In April 2008 a 10th category was added as a residual
category


Activities Merging Process
800 activities were proposed on the event website until
June 2008, each was given a code number
Merging to 200 in order to reduce the coordination
complexity and due to limited resources
Each theme having 1 coordinator and volunteers
supporting the merging process
Users were given options/suggestions for merging based on
similarities in proposed activities
Communication by phone, fax, e-mail, lists, skype etc.
Data extracted in excel files
Merging through the event website, new code numbers for
merged activities, activities got lost
Mismatch between actual web-database and excel files


Mobilization
Proposed target: 20,000 attendees
2 Mobilization Groups
Contact Group for Europe and the World (European mobilization)
Mobilization Group (Swedish)
Communication
Physical Meeting
Telephone Conferences
Mailing lists
Facebook group
Mobilization resulted in 13,000 attendees
Financial problems
Misunderstandings with the Athens 2006 mobilization group
Free-rider problem


Preparing Activities

One activity, many organizers (due to merging)
Some workshops used OpenESF to plan, others did
not, using e-mail or telcos instead
Difficulties in using the OpenESF platform
Difficulties in access (e.g., due to the war in Georgia)
Deficiency of IT skills
Language barriers
Manyfold negotiation processes
Existing network structures and alternative communication
infrastructures and habits/practices


Documenting Outcomes

Lacking official outcomes (general reader,
proceedings etc.)
Objective for ESF: open space for networking and
planning on common actions for the future
Event website used to record outcomes very
unstructured (some initiatives, some networks
started, some statements agreed with other
organizations)
Web-based form to report (43 initiatives published a
form)


Discussion
Highly complex interaction processes
Heterogeneous infrastructure and communication/use habits
Diversity of skills, languages and cultures, expectations and
experiences
Diversity of organizational structures
Knowledge Transfer/Expertise Sharing
From one event to the next
Between EPA and event committee (NOC)
Between ESF and other local, national and regional SFs and the
WSF
Between working groups, participants etc. in general


Discussion
Perception of Technology
Scepticism: technocracy, replacing physical interaction
Digital divide
Needs for technological infrastructure
Standardization of technology
Sustainability
Decentralized web sources, platforms, mailing lists etc.
Search & Find problem
Lacking integration concept
Common culture of information sharing and usage of
ICT infrastructure
Limited resources and training facilities
(e.g. provided by peers)


Conclusion and Future Work

Need for a better understanding of the social practice
of transnational CSO networks
Body of knowledge on technology support for this
specific kind of ad-hoc communities
Definition of design requirements
Participatory design of prototypical systems
Evaluation in practice

Ongoing research with respect to ESF, DSF, WSF


Thanks for your attention!

Markus Rohde
markus.rohde@uni-siegen.de
http://www.wineme.uni-siegen.de


Rohde Transnational Social Activist Communities

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Rohde Transnational Social Activist Communities

Similar to Rohde Transnational Social Activist Communities (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Rohde Transnational Social Activist Communities