Trauma-Informed Care
and Practice
Meeting the Challenge

Specialist Homelessness Services
Trauma-Informed Care
and Practice
Meeting the Challenge

Specialist Homelessness Services
Project Origins
I thought I was doing the right thing…
Exposure to Trauma
Once in a lifetime?

                           100%                                                 93%
Note:                       90%
General Population          80%
At least 1 event            70%
                                                          57%
Homeless Population         60%
At least 2 events, but 6    50%
on average.                 40%
100% of women who           30%
were homeless               20%
experienced at least one    10%
major traumatic event in     0%
their lives.
                                                              Traumatic Events

                                            General Population         People who are homeless


                           Hodder, Teesson & Buhrich (1998), Down and Out in Sydney:
                           Prevalence of Mental Disorders, Disability and Health Service Use among
                           Homeless People in Inner Sydney
                           Taylor (2006), PTSD Among Homeless Adults in Sydney
Home
75% of homeless people struggle to define ‘home’.


People who are housed:
House = just a house – four walls and a roof.
Home = a place of warmth and belonging among friends and family.


People who are homeless:
House = a shared dwelling that isn’t yours.
Home = a solitary living environment.
Homeless = escaping home.



                         Tomas and Dittmar (1995), The experience of homeless women: An
                         exploration of housing histories and the meaning of home
Compassionate Engagement
Listening
A key starting point to developing long-term solutions to iterative
homelessness by more effectively working to identify underlying rather
than presenting issues.
Core observation: those surviving both homelessness and violent
victimisation do not understand themselves as precious and worthy of
assistance.
For whom and how many will compassionate engagement, will
listening, come too late?




                        Robinson (2010), Rough living: surviving violence and homelessness
Compassionate Engagement
A persistent, reliable, intimate and respectful relationship
“the particular qualities which facilitate the development of an effective
working relationship in the context of case management. The quality of
intimacy is a consequence of the genuine emotional dimension and the
everyday nature of the case management activities”
            Gronda (2009), What makes case management work for people experiencing homelessness?



Rapport PLUS
Rapport building that goes beyond, perhaps, our traditional or
professional understanding. It demands that we keep less of an arms-
length. It insists that some attachment is necessary and healthy.
Attachment ≠ Dependence
Serving ≠ Enabling
Trauma-Informed Care in SHS
               Traditional Response                 Trauma-Informed Response

Impact of      Not a primary defining event in      Central, primary events impacting
Trauma         people’s lives.                      everything else – all-encompassing.
Style of                                            Proactive – services and systems
               Reactive – services and systems
Service /                                           focus on preventing further crisis
               are crisis-driven.
Atmosphere                                          and re-traumatisation.

Symptoms       Discrete and separate.               Inter-related and coping methods.

                                                    Shared power – everyone trained to
               ‘Objective’ and ‘distant’.           respond to someone in distress and
Worker /                                            about trauma’s impact on individuals
Client                                              People who are homeless are active
Relationship   Service-providers are the experts.
                                                    experts and partners in services –
               Homeless clients are passive
                                                    they’re viewed as experts in knowing
               recipients of services.
                                                    what is best for them.
Trauma-Informed Care in SHS
              Traditional Response                      Trauma-Informed Response

Support       Defined by service providers and          Defined by the person and focus on
Goals         focus on symptom reduction.               recovering and healing.
              Clients are broken, vulnerable,           Recovery is possible. Maximising
Road to       damaged and needing protection            choice, autonomy, self-
recovery      from themselves. Agencies are             determination, dignity and respect is
              responsible for ‘fixing’ the ‘problem’.   central to healing.
                                                        Challenging behaviours are the
              Difficult clients such as those with      ordinary responses to trauma.
Challenging
              behavioral problems and substance         They’re opportunities to help people
behaviours
              abuse issues are excluded.                address the impact of their
                                                        behaviours in their own lives.




                         A Long Journey Home, National Centre on Family Homelessness, USA
Trauma-Informed Care in SHS
Common Themes
Trauma awareness
Emphasis on safety
Opportunities to rebuild control
Strengths-based approach




                         Hopper, Bassuk and Olivet (2010), Shelter from the Storm: Trauma-
                         Informed Care in Homelessness Services Settings
Reflections
Am I still not doing the right thing…?

Rob Seaton presentation

  • 1.
    Trauma-Informed Care and Practice Meetingthe Challenge Specialist Homelessness Services
  • 2.
    Trauma-Informed Care and Practice Meetingthe Challenge Specialist Homelessness Services
  • 3.
    Project Origins I thoughtI was doing the right thing…
  • 4.
    Exposure to Trauma Oncein a lifetime? 100% 93% Note: 90% General Population 80% At least 1 event 70% 57% Homeless Population 60% At least 2 events, but 6 50% on average. 40% 100% of women who 30% were homeless 20% experienced at least one 10% major traumatic event in 0% their lives. Traumatic Events General Population People who are homeless Hodder, Teesson & Buhrich (1998), Down and Out in Sydney: Prevalence of Mental Disorders, Disability and Health Service Use among Homeless People in Inner Sydney Taylor (2006), PTSD Among Homeless Adults in Sydney
  • 5.
    Home 75% of homelesspeople struggle to define ‘home’. People who are housed: House = just a house – four walls and a roof. Home = a place of warmth and belonging among friends and family. People who are homeless: House = a shared dwelling that isn’t yours. Home = a solitary living environment. Homeless = escaping home. Tomas and Dittmar (1995), The experience of homeless women: An exploration of housing histories and the meaning of home
  • 6.
    Compassionate Engagement Listening A keystarting point to developing long-term solutions to iterative homelessness by more effectively working to identify underlying rather than presenting issues. Core observation: those surviving both homelessness and violent victimisation do not understand themselves as precious and worthy of assistance. For whom and how many will compassionate engagement, will listening, come too late? Robinson (2010), Rough living: surviving violence and homelessness
  • 7.
    Compassionate Engagement A persistent,reliable, intimate and respectful relationship “the particular qualities which facilitate the development of an effective working relationship in the context of case management. The quality of intimacy is a consequence of the genuine emotional dimension and the everyday nature of the case management activities” Gronda (2009), What makes case management work for people experiencing homelessness? Rapport PLUS Rapport building that goes beyond, perhaps, our traditional or professional understanding. It demands that we keep less of an arms- length. It insists that some attachment is necessary and healthy. Attachment ≠ Dependence Serving ≠ Enabling
  • 8.
    Trauma-Informed Care inSHS Traditional Response Trauma-Informed Response Impact of Not a primary defining event in Central, primary events impacting Trauma people’s lives. everything else – all-encompassing. Style of Proactive – services and systems Reactive – services and systems Service / focus on preventing further crisis are crisis-driven. Atmosphere and re-traumatisation. Symptoms Discrete and separate. Inter-related and coping methods. Shared power – everyone trained to ‘Objective’ and ‘distant’. respond to someone in distress and Worker / about trauma’s impact on individuals Client People who are homeless are active Relationship Service-providers are the experts. experts and partners in services – Homeless clients are passive they’re viewed as experts in knowing recipients of services. what is best for them.
  • 9.
    Trauma-Informed Care inSHS Traditional Response Trauma-Informed Response Support Defined by service providers and Defined by the person and focus on Goals focus on symptom reduction. recovering and healing. Clients are broken, vulnerable, Recovery is possible. Maximising Road to damaged and needing protection choice, autonomy, self- recovery from themselves. Agencies are determination, dignity and respect is responsible for ‘fixing’ the ‘problem’. central to healing. Challenging behaviours are the Difficult clients such as those with ordinary responses to trauma. Challenging behavioral problems and substance They’re opportunities to help people behaviours abuse issues are excluded. address the impact of their behaviours in their own lives. A Long Journey Home, National Centre on Family Homelessness, USA
  • 10.
    Trauma-Informed Care inSHS Common Themes Trauma awareness Emphasis on safety Opportunities to rebuild control Strengths-based approach Hopper, Bassuk and Olivet (2010), Shelter from the Storm: Trauma- Informed Care in Homelessness Services Settings
  • 11.
    Reflections Am I stillnot doing the right thing…?