Roadway Maintenance Fee
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•1,647 views
The document discusses a proposed roadway maintenance fee (RMF) to generate $4.5 million annually for road maintenance. The fee would be based on property use and estimated vehicle miles traveled. Residential fees would be flat while non-residential fees would be tiered based on business type. The fee could be included on utility bills. Example fees are provided for single family homes, apartments, and various non-residential properties. Policy considerations around fee structure, exemptions, and appeals processes are also discussed.
More Related Content
Similar to Roadway Maintenance Fee
Similar to Roadway Maintenance Fee (20)
More from City of College Station
More from City of College Station (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Roadway Maintenance Fee
- 1. Roadway Maintenance Fee October 27, 2016
- 3. Fee Structure Methodology • Revenue based on cost of providing roadway maintenance service – Dedicated Roadway Maintenance Fund – $4.5 million annual revenue • Fee based on use of/impact to roadway system – Travel characteristics of 60+ land uses (trip generation, trip length) – Vehicle miles per development unit (transportation demand factor) • Reasonable equitability – Property fee determined by vehicle miles traveled (VMT) • Lower administrative burden – Flat residential, tiered non-residential • Monthly user fee on utility bill
- 4. Example Property Residential Single Family House Multifamily Apartment unit Non-Residential NR Tier I Car Wash NR Tier 2 Bank (1 Drive-in Lane) NR Tier 3 Mini Storage NR Tier 4 Fast Food Restaurant NR Tier 5 Grocery Store Fee Structure
- 5. Example Property Option 1 Option 2 Residential Single Family House $7.78 $7.52 Multifamily Apartment unit $6.10 Non-Residential NR Tier I Car Wash $17.23 $17.23 NR Tier 2 Bank (1 Drive-in Lane) $38.71 $38.71 NR Tier 3 Mini Storage $74.71 $74.71 NR Tier 4 Fast Food Restaurant $152.39 $152.39 NR Tier 5 Grocery Store $250.00 $250.00 Fee Structure Options
- 6. Policy Considerations • Fee Structure • Exemptions – Other cities’ exemptions – TAMU and CSISD in consideration for other public benefit • Appeals Process
- 7. BACKUP Other Cities’ Appeals City Who? Land Use Inaccurately Assessed Single Business with multiple meters & LASF >118,000 cap Appeals Board? Corrections or Adjustments? Austin Anyone billed for RMF Yes Yes Yes Yes Corpus Christi Non- residential only Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Kingsville Non- residential only Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
- 8. BACKUP Other Cities’ Exemptions City School Districts Churches City Govt. County/State Govt. Hospitals Univ. Nonprofits Austin X X X Bryan X Corpus Christi X X X X X Kingsville X X X X X X X Lumberton X X X X Taylor X
Editor's Notes
- -commercial rates for businesses will vary based on monthly trip generation rates, land use and square footage. *The number of motor vehicle trips generated by a benefitted property may reasonably be used to estimate the prorated cost of the street system attributable to a benefitted property *The size and use of a property may reasonably be used to estimate the number of motor vehicle trips generated by the property It is reasonable and equitable to impose a set monthly fee per each developed residential and nonresidential benefitted property in order to avoid a disproportionate burden on any residential and nonresidential benefitted property.