the analysis of the union and state judiciary is explained in light of the Indian constitution. importance and role of article 32 is analyzed in the light of union and state judiciary
the analysis of the union and state judiciary is explained in light of the Indian constitution. importance and role of article 32 is analyzed in the light of union and state judiciary
Recently there was a controversy over the transfer of the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, Justice Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani, to the Meghalaya High Court. Justice Tahilramani submitted her resignation after her request for reconsideration of the transfer was rejected by the Collegium headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI), Ranjan Gogoi, and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court.
The national judicial appointments commission bill(NJAC);SSB Lec/Gp Dis 25Col Mukteshwar Prasad
NJAC has replaced existing Collegium system of Appointment of Judges which before taking off has already come under Judicial review which is being viewed as fight for supremacy of Judiciary versus Executive/Legislature in Parliamentary form of Govt in India.u
it is the 2nd part of judiciary of Nepal. it explain about court in Nepal with their qualifications, function jurisdiction etc according to the constitution of Nepal 2072
DescriptionThe Supreme Court of India is the premier judicial court under the Constitution of India. It is the highest constitutional court and has the power of judicial review.
Code of civil procedure 1908 reference, review, revisionDr. Vikas Khakare
This explains what is reference, review and revision. when and where it can be made. It also explains difference between reference, review and revision.
Recently there was a controversy over the transfer of the Chief Justice of the Madras High Court, Justice Vijaya Kamlesh Tahilramani, to the Meghalaya High Court. Justice Tahilramani submitted her resignation after her request for reconsideration of the transfer was rejected by the Collegium headed by the Chief Justice of India (CJI), Ranjan Gogoi, and four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court.
The national judicial appointments commission bill(NJAC);SSB Lec/Gp Dis 25Col Mukteshwar Prasad
NJAC has replaced existing Collegium system of Appointment of Judges which before taking off has already come under Judicial review which is being viewed as fight for supremacy of Judiciary versus Executive/Legislature in Parliamentary form of Govt in India.u
it is the 2nd part of judiciary of Nepal. it explain about court in Nepal with their qualifications, function jurisdiction etc according to the constitution of Nepal 2072
DescriptionThe Supreme Court of India is the premier judicial court under the Constitution of India. It is the highest constitutional court and has the power of judicial review.
Code of civil procedure 1908 reference, review, revisionDr. Vikas Khakare
This explains what is reference, review and revision. when and where it can be made. It also explains difference between reference, review and revision.
If you face any problem regarding the research then you can communicate with me and I would appreciate your comments.
E-mail: devendrasrivastava36@gmail.com
divyashreenandini@gmail.com
Discussion of Jurisdiction of Article 136 of Constitution of India
Why, where and when to approach Supreme Court
Right of litigant after judgment passed by High Court
In summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constituti.docxbradburgess22840
In summary, a defendant enjoys at least three important constitutional rights during the sentencing process: (1) the right not to be put twice in jeopardy; (2) the right to a sentence that conforms with the Eighth Amendment’s proscription against cruel and unusual punishment; and (3) the right to counsel at sentencing-related hearings, regardless of his or her ability to afford representation.
APPEALS and HABEAS CORPUS
1:APPEALS
An appeal occurs when an appellate court, such as one of the federal courts of appeal, examines a lower court’s decision in order to determine whether the proper procedure was followed or the correct law was applied. In other words, when a defendant appeals, he or she is claiming that the court made an error. Thus, the appeal guarantees that a defendant who is found guilty can challenge his or her conviction. Further, the appeal442443guarantees that another judge or panel of judges, disconnected from the initial trial, will make the relevant decision.
Although appealing convictions is an important part of the criminal process, the Supreme Court has never held that doing so is constitutionally permissible. That is, nowhere does the U.S. Constitution specify that a certain number of appeals will be granted to each convicted criminal. InMcKane v. Durston (153 U.S. 684 [1894]), the Supreme Court stated, “A review by an appellate court of the final judgment in a criminal case, however grave the offense of which the accused is convicted, was not at common law, and is not now, a necessary element of due process of law” (p. 687).
Most appeals are posttrial in nature and filed by the defense, which is why this topic is being discussed at the end of this book. However, in some situations, the defense appeals a court’s decision, such as on a motion to suppress evidence, during the trial. And in some instances, the prosecution can even file an appeal. Thus, this chapter will consider three types of appeals: (1) appeals by the defense prior to adjudication; (2) appeals by the defense after adjudication; and (3) appeals by the prosecution. First, however, it is important to review the common types of appeals and their consequences and the important Supreme Court cases dealing with the appellate process (i.e., the procedures courts are required to follow).■ Types and Effects of Appeals
Despite the Supreme Court’s view that appealing one’s conviction is not constitutionally guaranteed, every state and the federal government each has rules providing a certain number of appeals to a convicted criminal. At both the state and federal levels, a convicted criminal is usually granted at least one appeal of right, also known as a direct appeal, and at least one discretionary appeal.
An appeal of right, or a direct appeal, is automatically granted to the defendant by law. That is, an appeal of right must be heard by an appellate court. It is not up to the appellate court to decide whether to hear such an appeal. By contrast, the appellate .
President Jacob Zuma has today, 10 May 2017, filed an application for leave to appeal the decision of the North Gauteng High Court, handed down by Judge Bashier Vally, ordering the President to submit the record and reasons of the decision to reshuffle his Cabinet on 31 March 2017.
Ouster clauses and jurisdiction of civil courtsAnuja Aiyappan
The aim of the ppt is to understand what ouster clauses and jurisdiction of civil courts implies with respect to the Code of Civil Procedure applicable in and to do a study of the different provisions under the corresponding statutes.
After dismissal of review petition, final challenge to order or judgment of Supreme Court. Concept evolved by Supreme court to have statutorily recognized the right to approach supreme court in curative jurisdiction
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
WINDING UP of COMPANY, Modes of DissolutionKHURRAMWALI
Winding up, also known as liquidation, refers to the legal and financial process of dissolving a company. It involves ceasing operations, selling assets, settling debts, and ultimately removing the company from the official business registry.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of winding up:
Reasons for Winding Up:
Insolvency: This is the most common reason, where the company cannot pay its debts. Creditors may initiate a compulsory winding up to recover their dues.
Voluntary Closure: The owners may decide to close the company due to reasons like reaching business goals, facing losses, or merging with another company.
Deadlock: If shareholders or directors cannot agree on how to run the company, a court may order a winding up.
Types of Winding Up:
Voluntary Winding Up: This is initiated by the company's shareholders through a resolution passed by a majority vote. There are two main types:
Members' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is solvent (has enough assets to pay off its debts) and shareholders will receive any remaining assets after debts are settled.
Creditors' Voluntary Winding Up: The company is insolvent and creditors will be prioritized in receiving payment from the sale of assets.
Compulsory Winding Up: This is initiated by a court order, typically at the request of creditors, government agencies, or even by the company itself if it's insolvent.
Process of Winding Up:
Appointment of Liquidator: A qualified professional is appointed to oversee the winding-up process. They are responsible for selling assets, paying off debts, and distributing any remaining funds.
Cease Trading: The company stops its regular business operations.
Notification of Creditors: Creditors are informed about the winding up and invited to submit their claims.
Sale of Assets: The company's assets are sold to generate cash to pay off creditors.
Payment of Debts: Creditors are paid according to a set order of priority, with secured creditors receiving payment before unsecured creditors.
Distribution to Shareholders: If there are any remaining funds after all debts are settled, they are distributed to shareholders according to their ownership stake.
Dissolution: Once all claims are settled and distributions made, the company is officially dissolved and removed from the business register.
Impact of Winding Up:
Employees: Employees will likely lose their jobs during the winding-up process.
Creditors: Creditors may not recover their debts in full, especially if the company is insolvent.
Shareholders: Shareholders may not receive any payout if the company's debts exceed its assets.
Winding up is a complex legal and financial process that can have significant consequences for all parties involved. It's important to seek professional legal and financial advice when considering winding up a company.
Abdul Hakim Shabazz Deposition Hearing in Federal Court
Review jurisdiction of supreme court
1. Review Jurisdiction of Supreme Court
Review literally and even judicially means re-examination or re-
consideration on the philosophy that human errors crept sometimes.1 The
decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court is binding on parties, however,
aggrieved party has remedy to challenge or get it reviewed the order or
judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Appellate or Original
Jurisdiction by Hon’ble Supreme Court by filing review petition under
Article 137 of Constitution of India. That ratio decidendi of any case
decided by Supreme Court, in simple words, law declared by Supreme
Court shall be binding on all Courts within the territory of India. There is 30
days period of limitation to file review petition against the order or judgment
passed by Supreme Court under Article 133, 134 or 136 of Constitution of
India.
That as per Order XLVII Rule 1 of Supreme Court Rules 2013, in civil case,
review is permissible on the grounds mentioned in Order XLVII Rule 1 of
CPC, 1908 and in criminal case, review is permissible on the ground of
error apparent on face of record. That as per Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC,
grounds on which review is permissible on the grounds i.e. (i) discovery of
new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due
diligence was not within his knowledge or could not be produced by him at
the time when order made, or (ii) on account of some mistake or error
apparent on the face of the record or (iii) for any other sufficient reason2
.
Though it is limited jurisidiction but when sufficient case is made out, then
case under review jurisdiction is made out. It is important to note that the
fact that the decision on a question of law on which the judgement of the
Court is based has been reversed or modified by the subsequent decision
of a superior Court in any other case, shall not be a ground for the review
of such judgement.3 That Hon’ble Supreme Court exercised review
jurisdiction by not sitting in appeal and exercising an appellate jurisdiction
over the earlier decision but it does so in exercise of its inherent power and
only in exceptional circumstances such as when the earlier decision is per
1 [See: S. Nagaraj v. State of Karnataka, 1993 Supp (4) SCC 595]
2 [See Chhajju Ram v. Neki [LR 49 IA 144]
3 [See:Union of India v. Mohd. Nayyar Khalil, (2000) 9 SCC 252]
2. incuriam or is delivered in the absence of relevant or material facts or if it is
manifestly wrong and productive of public mischief.4 The question was
posed before Hon’ble Supreme Court is whether review is maintainable
against the order passed by Supreme Court for appointment of arbitrator
u/s 11(6) of Constitution of India. The Hon’ble Supreme Court answered in
positive by holding that an order passed by the Chief Justice of India or his
nominee under Section 11(6) of the Act is indeed an “order” within the
meaning of Article 137 of the Constitution and is subject to review under
the aforesaid provision.5
That though it is important to note that there is difference b/w mere
erroneous decision and decision with error apparent which resulting in
miscarriage of justice i.e. judicial error of such height that it cause rights of
parties severally prejudiced. More importantly, error apparent on record
means the error must be one of law not fact, and it must be manifest or
patent and not mere error. It has been explained to include failure to apply
the law of limitation to the fact found by the Court or failure to consider a
particular provision of a statute or a part thereof or a statutory provision
has been applied though it was not in operation. Review is permissible, if
there is an error of procedure apparent on the face of the record e.g. the
judgment is delivered without notice to the parties, or judgment does not
effectively deal with or determine any important issue in the case though
argued by the parties. That power of review cannot be confused with
appellate power which enables a superior Court to correct all errors
committed by a subordinate Court while review jurisdiction is limited
jurisdiction in which power of review can be exercised with extreme care,
caution and circumspection and only in exceptional cases when error crept
in inadvertently or otherwise and it is in the interest of justice, such a
mistake should be rectified.
4 [See: Bengal Immunity Company Ltd. v. State of Bihar [(1955) 2 SCR 603]
5 [See: Jain Studios Ltd. v. Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd. [(2006) 5 SCC 501]