2. The case mentions the dependence of BP’s IT
organization on external contractors. Why would
this be an issue? When is it a good idea for IT
departments to hire contractors, and when is it
not? Discuss some scenarios
3. Outside contractors
Hiring is Expensive
organization has Less Control over them
Their experience and knowledge cannot be used properly
Wont be participating in HR and other events
Contractor Pros
Can be used when expertise is unavailable within the organization
Can be hen only short-term commitment is needed and organization cant afford hiring
permanent employees
Contractor Cons
It is an expensive process
Knowledge/experience walk out the door when contractors leave
Not as much control or accountability (people's careers don't depend on the project's
success)
4. The culture of the IT organization is mentioned
as an important issue. How do you think it
changed throughout the period covered here?
What did it look like when Deasy came
onboard? What does it look like now
5. When Deasy took over the office:
IT organization was highly Decentralized
About 45% IT workers were contractors
The organization had around 2200 vendors
Organization was using around 8500 applications
The annual budget allocated was a massive $3Billion
Changes brought about by Deasy
wiped out most of IT leadership, made more centralized, each unit CIO works for
business leader and also reports to Deasy.
Cut around 1200 IT suppliers to reduce cost.
IT leaders became loyal to Deasy
IT leaders became empowered to make changes
IT leaders became less risk-averse
6. Present status of the IT organization
The system became highly centralized and the operations became more efficient
Company was able to cut down IT budget and saved around $900 million in the
next five years.
The entire organization was rebuilt by spending around $1.5 billion.
7. How did BP get into the situation mentioned at
the beginning of the transformation process?
Does it appear to be the result of a conscious
decision? Use examples to narrate
8. It seems to be a result of the attitude and business practices of the employees.
It was a conscious decision to operate in that way, but not to create that culture.“…an
organization he thought had become, like the company overall, bloated, passive,
unfocused, and unconcerned with performance and accountability.” The company’s
contractors were a huge problem as well. Not only were there too many, but they
weren’t properly managed.
There were a huge number of suppliers ,which was not necessary.
The company was allotting huge budgets annually without really knowing how it is being
utilized.
Managers weren’t ensuring that the value pitched in order to gain the contract was the
value being gained in the end.
What’s a vendor’s job over the next five years? Well, when you strip away all the fancy
talk, it’s to claw back all that money they gave up in our rebids.”