Download to read offline
Uploaded byMaria Joao Loureiro
REA_El@ies2012_práticas vs recursos_avaliação
This document discusses open educational practices and resources, and addresses related questions and possibilities. It examines the impacts of using open practices and resources on various stakeholders, and discusses frameworks for evaluating quality and sustainability in this area. Case studies are presented that illustrate lessons learned from experiences using information and communication technologies in educational contexts.
More Related Content
Similar to REA_El@ies2012_práticas vs recursos_avaliação
REA_El@ies2012_práticas vs recursos_avaliação
- 1. Práticas vs recursoseducativas(os) abertas(os): Questões e possibilidades… Maria João Loureiro DE, CIDTFF, Universidade de Aveiro 2º Encontro de Instituições e Unidades de e-Learning no ES, 8/9/2012, Lisboa
- 2. Sumário 1. Práticas vs recursos – Ensino/investigação/supervisão – indissociáveis e contextualizados – Ciclos inovação “design-bsed”: avaliação fundamental 2. Avaliação da qualidade – Que objetos Que referenciais? Que questões? – Global vs contextualizado? 3. Um percurso Maria João Loureiro 08-10-12 DE, CIDTFF, Universidade de Aveiro
- 3. UKOER evaluation framework Dimenções Categorias Culture and practice Enablers and barriers, effect/impact on practices (of the different skateholders), strategies and skateholders engagement… Releasing and using OERs Role of collaborations, technical and hosting issues, discovery and organisation, accessibility, and adaptability of OERs Sustainability Institutional/organisational policies and processes, legal and IPR policies, other strategies to support sustainability … Maria João Loureiro 08-10-12 DE, CIDTFF, Universidade de Aveiro
- 4. 1. Quais osimpactos do uso de P/REA Maria João Loureiro DE, CIDTFF, Universidade de Aveiro nas práticas dos envolvidos (macro/meso/micro)? ? 08-10-12 Efeitos/impactos
- 5. Um caminho -Cotiques Exp1 Uma comunidade online • um domínio, objetivos St1 partilhados e um repertório Exp2 (Wenger, 1998) St4 St5 St3 em que a colaboração St8 • partilha, discussão (avaliação St6 por pares) e teste de ideias St2 (Gunawardena et al., 1997) St7 e a comunicação Supervisor •diálogo aberto, desenvolvi- St9 St11 mento de comp. de comuni- St12 cação oral e de escrita St10 Sv1 St13 académica St14 ocorreram. Maria João Loureiro 08-10-12 DE, CIDTFF, Universidade de Aveiro
- 6. Factors affecting onlinesupervision • Positive – availability of supervisor (night sessions), peer support and feedback • Negative – supervision overload, lack of shared bibliographic resources • Disparate – Content tools (suitable to share students doc but not biblio) – Students attitudes (self-efficacy, independence) and conceptions – Interaction through computer conferencing (fóruns) • Amount of information/information search tool • Text-based (thoughtful but time consuming) • Participation (overloading/underwhelming). Maria João Loureiro 08-10-12 DE, CIDTFF, Universidade de Aveiro
- 7. Reflexion Quality factors Good online research supervision feedback from students and peer time complexion (one – one and a half year) increase of research competencies, as well as digital literacy Sustainability difficulties to manage CoP instability communication tools Maria João Loureiro 08-10-12 DE, CIDTFF, Universidade de Aveiro
- 8. http://cms.ua.pt/RedeSIDEdu/ Maria João Loureiro 08-10-12 DE, CIDTFF, Universidade de Aveiro
- 9. Considerações finais: colaboração Fonte: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3ANODEXL.jpg Maria João Loureiro 08-10-12 DE, CIDTFF, Universidade de Aveiro
- 10. Impact studies •TIC/RP St1 •TIC/Inf-search St4 St5 •TIC/learning to learn St3 •TIC/science image St8 •Webquest/motivation St6 St2 St7 Supervisor St9 St11 St12 St10 Sv1 St13 St14
- 11. Exp1 Lessons plan •ICT collaborative project, primarySt1 school students Exp2 St4 St5 St3 St8 St6 St2 St7 Supervisor St9 St11 St12 St10 Sv1 St13 St14
- 12. Exp1 St1 Exp2 St4 St5 St3 St8 St6 St2 St7 Supervisor St9 St11 St12 St10 Sv1 Software development St13 St14
- 13. Exp1 St1 Exp2 St4 St5 St3 St8 St6 St2 St7 Supervisor StICT use11 9 St St12 •teachers St10 Sv1 St13 •students St14
- 14. Exp1 St1 Exp2 St4 St5 St3 CoP St8 •Curr development St6 •Interaction analysis St2 •constitution St7 Supervisor St9 St11 St12 St10 Sv1 St13 St14
Editor's Notes
- #2 My presentation is about an ongoing project “Science Education Research and School Practices: Dynamics of Interaction” which is financed both by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and our research centre (Research Centre in Didactics and Technology in Teachers Education).