With the pending release of the SEC's Reg BI, the issues of prudence and FINRA's fair dealing requirement are sure to receive considerable attention. The Active Management Value Ratio is a valuable metric to assist in the forensic analysis of actively managed mutual funds.
Far too many 401(k)/403(b) plan sponsors, trustees, and other investment fiduciaries leave themselves unnecessarily exposed to personal liability due to the selection of cost-inefficient investment options. The Active Management Value Ratio is a simple, yet powerful, metric that allows fiduciaries to quickly determine whether an actively managed mutual fund is cost-efficient and, therefore prudent under applicable fiduciary standards.
The Active Management Value Ratio 2.0 is a metric that allows investors and investment fiduciaries, such as pension plan sponsors and trustees, to avoid unsuitable investments and unwanted liability exposure.
FINRA has its suitability and fair dealing rules. The SEC recently adopted its new Reg BI rule. Now, the Department of Labor has announced that it is going to enact a new fiduciary rule. Is it any wonder that investment fiduciaries, 401(k) plan sponsors and financial advisors are thoroughly confused as to what rule applies and when? One constant in each rule is a focus on the comparative cost, or cost-efficiency, of investments recommended by an advisor and/or utilized by an investment fiduciary. The Active Management Value Ratio™ 3.0 (AMVR) is a simple, yet powerful, metric that allows investors, investment fiduciaries and attorneys to evaluate the cost-efficiency of actively managed mutual funds and avoid unnecessary losses due to cost-inefficient.mutual funds.
A Scottish proverb says "Make as much money as you can and keep what you get. That's the way to become rich." A familiar saying on Wall Street is "don't tell me how much money you made; how much were you able to keep?" While wealth accumulation often gets the media attention, accumulation without preservation is meaningless. Improperly designed and/or maintained investment portfolios are a common wealth preservation issue. The Active Management Value Ratio metric provides investors and wealth advisers with a quick and simple way to expose cost-inefficient investments and prevent unnecessary wealth losses.
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...James Watkins, III JD CFP®
As the concepts of prudence and "best interests take on even greater importance in ERISA law and the overall investment industry, the ability to properly evaluate investment advice takes on even greater importance in order to avoid unwanted professional liability exposure.
The Brotherston decision, and SCOTUS' decision not to hear Putnam's appeal, have drastically changed the 401(k) landscape. Given the anticipated adoption of the First Circuit's position and logic by other jurisdictions, plan sponsors and plan advises face a daunting challenge to meet the applicable fiduciary prudence standards established under the Restatement (Third) of Trusts. This presentation proposes a post-Brotherston three-step procedure in addressing 401(k) fiduciary prudence issues for plan sponsors, plan advises and ERISA attorneys.
Many investment advisers and other investment fiduciaries, such as 401(k) plan sponsors, leave themselves open to successful fiduciary liability litigation cases due to their failure to properly evaluate available investment options and to ask and answer one key question regarding fiduciary prudence.
Many investment advisers and other investment fiduciaries, such as 401(k) plan sponsors, leave themselves open to successful fiduciary liability litigation cases due to their failure to properly evaluate available investment options and to ask and answer one key question regarding fiduciary prudence.
Far too many 401(k)/403(b) plan sponsors, trustees, and other investment fiduciaries leave themselves unnecessarily exposed to personal liability due to the selection of cost-inefficient investment options. The Active Management Value Ratio is a simple, yet powerful, metric that allows fiduciaries to quickly determine whether an actively managed mutual fund is cost-efficient and, therefore prudent under applicable fiduciary standards.
The Active Management Value Ratio 2.0 is a metric that allows investors and investment fiduciaries, such as pension plan sponsors and trustees, to avoid unsuitable investments and unwanted liability exposure.
FINRA has its suitability and fair dealing rules. The SEC recently adopted its new Reg BI rule. Now, the Department of Labor has announced that it is going to enact a new fiduciary rule. Is it any wonder that investment fiduciaries, 401(k) plan sponsors and financial advisors are thoroughly confused as to what rule applies and when? One constant in each rule is a focus on the comparative cost, or cost-efficiency, of investments recommended by an advisor and/or utilized by an investment fiduciary. The Active Management Value Ratio™ 3.0 (AMVR) is a simple, yet powerful, metric that allows investors, investment fiduciaries and attorneys to evaluate the cost-efficiency of actively managed mutual funds and avoid unnecessary losses due to cost-inefficient.mutual funds.
A Scottish proverb says "Make as much money as you can and keep what you get. That's the way to become rich." A familiar saying on Wall Street is "don't tell me how much money you made; how much were you able to keep?" While wealth accumulation often gets the media attention, accumulation without preservation is meaningless. Improperly designed and/or maintained investment portfolios are a common wealth preservation issue. The Active Management Value Ratio metric provides investors and wealth advisers with a quick and simple way to expose cost-inefficient investments and prevent unnecessary wealth losses.
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...James Watkins, III JD CFP®
As the concepts of prudence and "best interests take on even greater importance in ERISA law and the overall investment industry, the ability to properly evaluate investment advice takes on even greater importance in order to avoid unwanted professional liability exposure.
The Brotherston decision, and SCOTUS' decision not to hear Putnam's appeal, have drastically changed the 401(k) landscape. Given the anticipated adoption of the First Circuit's position and logic by other jurisdictions, plan sponsors and plan advises face a daunting challenge to meet the applicable fiduciary prudence standards established under the Restatement (Third) of Trusts. This presentation proposes a post-Brotherston three-step procedure in addressing 401(k) fiduciary prudence issues for plan sponsors, plan advises and ERISA attorneys.
Many investment advisers and other investment fiduciaries, such as 401(k) plan sponsors, leave themselves open to successful fiduciary liability litigation cases due to their failure to properly evaluate available investment options and to ask and answer one key question regarding fiduciary prudence.
Many investment advisers and other investment fiduciaries, such as 401(k) plan sponsors, leave themselves open to successful fiduciary liability litigation cases due to their failure to properly evaluate available investment options and to ask and answer one key question regarding fiduciary prudence.
This allows for a sufficient tax shield to maximize the profitability of the buyout. By utilizing such leverage, we incur a great deal from the tax shield. Further, we would pay off the debt using our excess free cash flow to pay off the debt. By the end of the 5th year, we would sell the firm andgain from any excess value found within the firm.
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...James Watkins, III JD CFP®
The Active Management Value Ratio (AMVR) is a variation of the popular cost-benefit analysis metric commonly uased in the business world the evaluate projects. The AMVR uses the incremental costs and incremental returns between an actively managed mutual fund and an index fund to evaluate the cost-efficiency, or cost-inefficiency, of an actively managed fund relative to a comparable index fund.
The AMVR allows plan sponsors, trustees, and other investment fiduciaries to avoid unwanted fiduciary liability. The AMVR allows attorneys and investors to easily assess the prudence of actively managed mutual funds in terms of investment prudence.
"Active Management Value Ratio", "AMVR" and the "InvestSense" logo are trademarks of InvestSense, LLC.
This allows for a sufficient tax shield to maximize the profitability of the buyout. By utilizing such leverage, we incur a great deal from the tax shield. Further, we would pay off the debt using our excess free cash flow to pay off the debt. By the end of the 5th year, we would sell the firm andgain from any excess value found within the firm.
The Active Management Value Ratio: The New Science of Benchmarking Investment...James Watkins, III JD CFP®
The Active Management Value Ratio (AMVR) is a variation of the popular cost-benefit analysis metric commonly uased in the business world the evaluate projects. The AMVR uses the incremental costs and incremental returns between an actively managed mutual fund and an index fund to evaluate the cost-efficiency, or cost-inefficiency, of an actively managed fund relative to a comparable index fund.
The AMVR allows plan sponsors, trustees, and other investment fiduciaries to avoid unwanted fiduciary liability. The AMVR allows attorneys and investors to easily assess the prudence of actively managed mutual funds in terms of investment prudence.
"Active Management Value Ratio", "AMVR" and the "InvestSense" logo are trademarks of InvestSense, LLC.
The Art of Business ValuationMany investors insist on affixing e.docxmehek4
The Art of Business Valuation
Many investors insist on affixing exact values to their investments, seeking precision in an imprecise world, but business value cannot be precisely determined. Reported book value, earnings, and cash flow are, after all, only the best guesses of accountants who follow a fairly strict set of standards and practices designed more to achieve conformity than to reflect economic value. Projected results are less precise still. You cannot appraise the value of your home to the nearest thousand dollars. Why would it be any easier to place a value on vast and complex businesses?
Not only is business value imprecisely knowable, it also changes over time, fluctuating with numerous macroeconomic, microeconomic, and market-related factors. So while investors at any given time cannot determine business value with precision, they must nevertheless almost continuously reassess their estimates of value in order to incorporate all known factors that could influence their appraisal.
Any attempt to value businesses with precision will yield values that are precisely inaccurate. The problem is that it is easy to confuse the capability to make precise forecasts with the ability to make accurate ones. Anyone with a simple, hand-held calculator can perform net present value (NPV) and internal rate of return (IRR) calculations. The NPV calculation provides a single-point value of an investment by discounting estimates of future cash flow back to the present. IRR, using assumptions Of future cash flow and price paid, is a calculation of the rate of return on an investment to as many decimal places as desired. The seeming precision provided by NPV and IRR calculations can give investors a false sense of certainty for they are really only as accurate as the cash flow assumptions that were used to derive them.
The advent of the computerized spreadsheet has exacerbated this problem, creating the illusion of extensive and thoughtful analysis, even for the most haphazard of efforts. Typically, investors place a great deal of importance on the output, even though they pay little attention to the assumptions. "Garbage in, garbage out" is an apt description of the process.
NPV and IRR are wonderful at summarizing, in absolute and percentage terms, respectively, the returns for a given series of cash flows. When cash flows are contractually determined, as in the case of a bond, and when all payments are received when due, IRR provides the precise rate of return to the investor while NPV describes the value of the investment at a given discount rate. In the case of a bond, these calculations allow investors to quantify their returns under one set of assumptions, that is, that contractual payments are received when due. These tools, however, are of no use in determining the likelihood that investors will actually receive all contractual payments and, in fact, achieve the projected returns.
A Range of Value
Businesses, unlike debt instruments, do ...
IFRS 13 CVA DVA FVA and the Implications for Hedge Accounting - By Quantifi a...Quantifi
International Financial Reporting Standard 13: fair value measurement (IFRS 13) was originally issued in May 2011 and applies to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2013. IFRS 13 provides a framework for determining fair value, clarifies the factors to be considered for estimating fair value and identifies key principles for estimating fair value. IFRS 13 facilitates preparers to apply, and users to better understand, the fair value measurements in financial statements, therefore helping improve consistency in the application of fair value measurement.
Discount rate for the valuation of your company or startupEquidam
Understanding discount rate: definition, formulas, importance for negotiation and useful sources to find the right one for the valuation of your company or startup.
Read more on: https://www.equidam.com/the-discount-rate-in-the-valuation-of-a-startup/
Curious about your discount rate and valuation? Sign up for free at at https://www.equidam.com/
Mercer Capital | Valuation Insight | Corporate Finance in 30 Minutes Mercer Capital
Corporate finance does not need to be a mystery.
In this whitepaper, we have distilled the fundamental principles of corporate finance into an accessible and non-technical primer. Structured around the three key decisions of capital structure, capital budgeting, and dividend policy, the guide is designed to assist directors and shareholders without a finance background to make relevant and meaningful contributions to the most consequential financial decisions all companies must make. Our goal with this whitepaper is to give directors and shareholders a vocabulary and conceptual framework for thinking about strategic corporate finance decisions, allowing them to bring their perspectives and expertise to the discussion.
Similar to Quantifying "Prudence" & "Fair Dealing"; The Active Management Value Ratio™ (20)
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
PRECEDENT AS A SOURCE OF LAW (SAIF JAVED).pptxOmGod1
Precedent, or stare decisis, is a cornerstone of common law systems where past judicial decisions guide future cases, ensuring consistency and predictability in the legal system. Binding precedents from higher courts must be followed by lower courts, while persuasive precedents may influence but are not obligatory. This principle promotes fairness and efficiency, allowing for the evolution of the law as higher courts can overrule outdated decisions. Despite criticisms of rigidity and complexity, precedent ensures similar cases are treated alike, balancing stability with flexibility in judicial decision-making.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
ALL EYES ON RAFAH BUT WHY Explain more.pdf46adnanshahzad
All eyes on Rafah: But why?. The Rafah border crossing, a crucial point between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, often finds itself at the center of global attention. As we explore the significance of Rafah, we’ll uncover why all eyes are on Rafah and the complexities surrounding this pivotal region.
INTRODUCTION
What makes Rafah so significant that it captures global attention? The phrase ‘All eyes are on Rafah’ resonates not just with those in the region but with people worldwide who recognize its strategic, humanitarian, and political importance. In this guide, we will delve into the factors that make Rafah a focal point for international interest, examining its historical context, humanitarian challenges, and political dimensions.
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v/s Union of India.pptxshweeta209
transfer of the P.I.L filed by lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in Delhi High Court to Supreme Court.
on the issue of UNIFORM MARRIAGE AGE of men and women.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
Introducing New Government Regulation on Toll Road.pdfAHRP Law Firm
For nearly two decades, Government Regulation Number 15 of 2005 on Toll Roads ("GR No. 15/2005") has served as the cornerstone of toll road legislation. However, with the emergence of various new developments and legal requirements, the Government has enacted Government Regulation Number 23 of 2024 on Toll Roads to replace GR No. 15/2005. This new regulation introduces several provisions impacting toll business entities and toll road users. Find out more out insights about this topic in our Legal Brief publication.
Quantifying "Prudence" & "Fair Dealing"; The Active Management Value Ratio™
1. QUANTIFYING “PRUDENCE” & “FAIR DEALING”:
THE ACTIVE MANAGEMENT VALUE RATIO™
JAMES W. WATKINS, III, J.D., AWMA®
INVESTSENSE, LLC
2. Defining “Prudence”
The generally accepted definition of
investment prudence is acting
“with the care, skill, prudence, and
diligence under the circumstances then
prevailing that a prudent man acting in a
like capacity and familiar with such matters
would use in the conduct of an enterprise
of a like character and with like aims….”
3. Defining “Fair Dealing”
FINRA Rule 2111 SM-2111-.01 (formerly
NASD Rule 2310) states that
“Implicit in all member and associated person
relationships with customers and others is the
fundamental responsibility for fair dealing.
Sales efforts must therefore be undertaken…
with particular emphasis on the requirement
to deal fairly with the public.”
4. The Scott Epstein Decision
“As relevant here, NASD Rule IM-2310-
2(a)(2) provides that ‘sales efforts must be
judged on the basis of whether they can be
reasonably said to represent fair treatment
for the persons to whom the sales efforts are
directed . . . .’”
“Epstein abdicated his responsibility for fair
dealing when he put his own self-interest
ahead of the interests of his customer.”
5. Prudence and the AMVR
Recent ERISA court actions have argued over
the proper way to evaluate mutual funds,
including comparisons over funds’
> business platforms
> annualized returns
> expense ratios
> assets under management
> popularity
6. Prudence and the AMVR
“[t]he best way to measure a manager’s
performance is to compare his or her
return with that of a comparable passive
alternative.” – Nobel Laureate William F.
Sharpe
7. Prudence and the AMVR
“So, the incremental fees for an actively
managed mutual fund relative to its
incremental returns should always be
compared to the fees for a comparable
index fund relative to its returns.” – Charles
D. Ellis
8. Prudence and the AMVR
The Active Management Value Ratio™
(AMVR) ignores all the irrelevant collateral
issues and focuses on what really matters
– the cost-efficiency, or the true benefit, if
any, provided to investors.
The AMVR essentially says “I don’t care
how you did it, but whether you actually
provided a real incremental benefit to me
at all.”
9. Prudence and the AMVR
The following slides explain how attorneys and
investment fiduciaries can interpret the AMVR
calculation process and use the AMVR as a
forensic analysis/risk management tool.
The two funds shown on the slides are two of
the most popular mutual funds in terms of
invested assets, both in terms of retail shares
and retirement shares.
10. Fees
Total
Fees AER
Annual
Return
Active Fund
Expense Ratio 0.64 5.40 15.47 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 25% 0.30 0.30 14.11 Load Adjusted
Total Active Costs 0.94 5.70 12.94 Risk Adjusted
Benchmark
Expense Ratio 0.17 0.17 15.34 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 3% 0.10 0.10 14.06 Risk Adjusted
Total Bmark Costs 0.27 0.27
IC/IR 0.67 5.43 (1.12)
% Fees/% Return 71% 95% NA
11. AMVR Annual Returns
The AMVR examines three types of returns:
1. Nominal, or stated, returns.
2. Load-adjusted returns, showing the impact
of any front-end fees charged by a fund.
3. Risk-adjusted returns.
AMVR uses risk-adjusted returns in its
calculations. Here, the fund failed to even
provide a positive incremental return.
12. Fees
Total
Fees AER
Annual
Return
Active Fund
Expense Ratio 0.64 5.40 15.47 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 25% 0.30 0.30 14.11 Load Adjusted
Total Active Costs 0.94 5.70 12.94 Risk Adjusted
Benchmark
Expense Ratio 0.17 0.17 15.34 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 3% 0.10 0.10 14.06 Risk Adjusted
Total Bmark Costs 0.27 0.27
IC/IR 0.67 5.43 (1.12)
% Fees/% Return 71% 95% NA
13. AMVR Nominal Fees
The AMVR combines a fund’s annual
expense ratio and the fund’s turnover/
trading costs in calculating a fund’s total
costs.
While trading costs are factored into a
fund’s stated return as part of a fund’s
operating costs, they are not broken out
separately, preventing investors from
comparing such costs for each fund.
14. AMVR Nominal Fees
Since funds are not legally required to provide
investors with the fund’s actual trading costs,
the AMVR uses a metric created by John
Bogle as a proxy for such costs.
Trading costs = (fund turnover x 2) * 0.60
15. AMVR Nominal Fees
Bogle’s metric allows investors to compare
the efficiency of the management of two
funds. If two funds have comparable
annualized returns, but the trading costs of
one of the funds is twice that of the other
fund, that is information that most investors
would find valuable. As Mr. Bogle often
said, “costs matter.”
16. Fees
Total
Fees AER
Annual
Return
Active Fund
Expense Ratio 0.64 5.40 15.47 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 25% 0.30 0.30 14.11 Load Adjusted
Total Active Costs 0.94 5.70 12.94 Risk Adjusted
Benchmark
Expense Ratio 0.17 0.17 15.34 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 3% 0.10 0.10 14.06 Risk Adjusted
Total Bmark Costs 0.27 0.27
IC/IR 0.67 5.43 (1.12)
% Fees/% Return 71% 95% NA
17. AMVR AER-Adjusted Fees
The AMVR also calculates a fund’s fees using
Ross Miller’s Active Expense Ratio (AER)
metric. The AER reveals the implicit cost of a
fund’s active management component and
helps investors avoid potential “closet” index
funds, funds that closely track comparable
indices and/or index funds, but charge
substantially higher fees than comparable
index funds.
18. AMVR Fee Calculations
A common question about AMVR calculations
is why trading costs are included in fee
calculations. The AMVR can also be
calculated solely on the basis of the funds’
annual expenses ratios, both nominal and
AER-adjusted. When InvestSense prepares
reports for clients, we provide data using both
approaches and let the client decide how to
utilize the data.
19. Fees
Total
Fees AER
Annual
Return
Active Fund
Expense Ratio 0.74 5.48 15.47 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 29% 0.35 0.35 14.81 Risk Adjusted
Total Active Costs 1.09 5.83
Benchmark
Expense Ratio 0.17 0.17 15.34 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 3% 0.10 0.10 14.06 Risk Adjusted
Total Bmark Costs 0.27 0.27
IC/IR 0.80 5.56 0.75
% Fees/% Return 73% 95% 5.0%
20. Calculating the AMVR
InvestSense calculates a fund’s AMVR
score by dividing a fund’s AER-adjusted
incremental cost by the fund’s risk-
adjusted incremental return.
The goal is an AMVR score between one
(1) and zero (0). This indicates that a fund
is cost-efficient, that the fund’s costs were
less than the fund’s returns
21. Calculating the AMVR
The AMVR requires an investor to ask two
preliminary questions:
1. Did the fund provide a positive
incremental return?
2. If so, did the fund’s incremental return
exceed its incremental costs?
22. Calculating the AMVR
If the answer to either question is “no,” the fund
is not cost-efficient and no AMVR is needed
The AMVR formula: AMVR = AER IC/RAR IR
Using the second fund:
Nominal AMVR = .80/.75 = 1.07
AER-adjusted AMVR = 5.56/.75 = 7.41
23. Fees
Total
Fees AER
Annual
Return
Active Fund
Expense Ratio 0.74 5.48 15.47 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 29% 0.35 0.35 14.81 Risk Adjusted
Total Active Costs 1.09 5.83
Benchmark
Expense Ratio 0.17 0.17 15.34 Nominal
TO/Trading Cost 3% 0.10 0.10 14.06 Risk Adjusted
Total Bmark Costs 0.27 0.27
IC/IR 0.80 5.56 0.75
% Fees/% Return 73% 95% 5.0%
24. The Cost-Efficiency Quotient
The Cost-Efficiency Quotient (CEQ) is a
proprietary metric of InvestSense that
measures a fund’s cost-efficiency. The
CEQ is calculated by dividing a fund’s fee
percentage by its return percentage.
Using the second fund:
Nominal CEQ would be 14.6.
AER-adjusted CEQ would be 19.0.
25. The Fiduciary Prudence Score
InvestSense also uses a proprietary metric,
the Fiduciary Prudence Score (PFS), which
measures the performance of an actively
managed fund based on the fund’s efficiency,
both in terms of cost and risk management,
as well as the fund’s overall consistency of
performance.
26. Going Forward
In analyzing the decisions of investment
fiduciaries, there are two key questions:
1. Were the fiduciary’s decisions prudent?
2. If the fiduciary is FINRA registered, did
the fiduciary put his/her self interests
ahead of the customer/plan participants,
thereby violating their duty of fair dealing?
27. Going Forward
So, when using the AMVR for forensic
analysis, the two key questions become
1. Are cost-inefficient investment options
prudent ?
2. Do recommendations to buy cost-
inefficient investments violate a
stockbroker’s duty of fair dealing with
customers/plan participants?
28. Going Forward
The importance of prudence will gain even
more importance under the SEC’s proposed
Reg BI. Reg BI states that in order to meet
Reg BI’s “best interest” requirement, anyone
offering investment recommendations to the
public must exercise “reasonable diligence,
care, skill and prudence.” (emphasis added)
29. Going Forward
The Restatement (Third) of Trusts will
undoubtedly be referenced in connection
with Reg BI’s prudence requirement.
Comment h(2) of Section 90 of the
Restatement essentially states that it
would be imprudent for anyone to
recommend an actively managed mutual
fund that is not cost-efficient.
30. Going Forward
The Restatement’s position is even more
interesting, given the various studies that
have concluded that the overwhelming
majority of actively managed mutual funds
are not cost-efficient. As one study noted:
“[T]here is strong evidence that the vast
majority of active managers are unable to
produce excess returns that cover their
costs.”
Editor's Notes
RGAGX 5.75% front end load/STDEV 10.27/R-sqrd 98/AW .1240
RGAGX 5.75% front end load/STDEV 10.27/R-sqrd 98/AW .1240
RGAGX 5.75% front end load/STDEV 10.27/R-sqrd 98/AW .1240