Stand out from the crowd by adding Evidence-Informed Public Health (EIPH) to your portfolio! Join us to learn about EIPH and resources you can use to develop these in-demand skills.
Students in Public Health programs are expected to use the best available research evidence in coursework, practicum placements and upon entry into the public health workforce. This webinar will feature an overview of the process for evidence-informed public health and a model for evidence-informed decision making. Learn more about valuable online resources from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) that can help you become skilled in finding and using the best available research evidence and developing the core competencies for public health.
A panel of current MPH students and MPH alumni from various programs across the country will share their experiences of using research evidence in coursework and their public health careers.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Students in Public Health programs are expected to use the best available research evidence in coursework, practicum placements and upon entry into the public health workforce. This webinar will feature an overview of the process for evidence-informed public health and a model for evidence-informed decision making. Learn more about valuable online resources from the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) that can help you become skilled in finding and using the best available research evidence and developing the core competencies for public health.
A panel of current MPH students and MPH alumni from various programs across the country will share their experiences of using research evidence in coursework and their public health careers.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Economic Evaluation of the Electronic Palliative Care Coordination System (EP...NHS Improving Quality
As part of our work on End of Life Care, an Economic Evaluation of the Electronic Palliative Care Coordination System (EPaCCS) Early Implementer Sites was undertaken. The evaluation includes quantifying impact from implementation, co-ordination of care and the economic case for EPaCCS.
Riff: A Social Network and Collaborative Platform for Public Health Disease S...Taha Kass-Hout, MD, MS
A hybrid (event-based and indicator-based) platform designed to streamline the collaboration between domain experts and machine learning algorithms for detection, prediction and response to health-related events (such as disease outbreaks or pandemics). The platform helps synthesize health-related event indicators from a wide variety of information sources (structured and unstructured) into a consolidated picture for analysis, maintenance of “community-wide coherence”, and collaboration processes. The platform offers features to detect anomalies, visualize clusters of potential events, predict the rate and spread of a disease outbreak and provide decision makers with tools, methodologies and processes to investigate the event.
Patient Engagement in Health Economic and Outcomes Research: Current and Future ISPOR Initiatives, presentation from the ISPOR 20th International meeting Philadelphia, May 2015, by the Patient Centered Special Interest Group
Interoperability, pop up uni, 10am, 3 september 2015NHS England
Expo is the most significant annual health and social care event in the calendar, uniting more NHS and care leaders, commissioners, clinicians, voluntary sector partners, innovators and media than any other health and care event.
Expo 15 returned to Manchester and was hosted once again by NHS England. Around 5000 people a day from health and care, the voluntary sector, local government, and industry joined together at Manchester Central Convention Centre for two packed days of speakers, workshops, exhibitions and professional development.
This year, Expo was more relevant and engaging than ever before, happening within the first 100 days of the new Government, and almost 12 months after the publication of the NHS Five Year Forward View. It was also a great opportunity to check on and learn from the progress of Greater Manchester as the area prepares to take over a £6 billion devolved health and social care budget, pledging to integrate hospital, community, primary and social care and vastly improve health and well-being.
More information is available online: www.expo.nhs.uk
Using Social Media to Support Youth Healthy Sexual BehaviorYTH
Erin Wright of the mHealth Impact Laboratory at the Colorado School of Public Health, provides an overview of Just/Us, a study to analyze the impact of social networking sites to effectively support healthy sexual behavior for young people. Presented at YTH Live 2014 session "Social Media for Sexual Health Outreach."
The use of Information and Communication Technology to support South African ...Michael Rowe
This is the first conference presentation I ever gave. It was in 2008 at the South African Association of Health Educators (SAAHE) conference at Stellenbosch University.
I came across it just now and thought I'd put it up here, just for the sake of being complete.
Patient involvement in clinical research and long term conditions -what can b...Nowgen
"Patient involvement in clinical research and long term conditions -what can be achieved by working in partnership", presented by Dr. J. Paul Schofield, ABPI, at EUPATI-UK Network Conference on 6 March 2014 in Leeds, UK
Remote Monitoring of Rheumatoid Arthritis using a Smartphone app3GDR
Dr Lynn Austin, Research Fellow, University of Manchester:
https://mhealthinsight.com/2016/06/27/join-us-at-the-kings-funds-digital-health-care-congress/
This poster on Database Trial Success Through Community Organizing was presented at the Medical Library Association Conference in May, 2015 in Austin, Texas.
This webinar on evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) draws on The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT)'s seven-step process, with reference to methods and tools for each step that are specific to mental health practice.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) is one of six National Collaborating Centres for Public Health in the country with a collective mandate to strengthen public health in Canada. Visit the NCCMT website (www.nccmt.ca) or contact nccmt@mcmaster.ca for more information.
This webinar on evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) draws on The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT)'s seven-step process, with reference to methods and tools for each step that are specific to healthy weights.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada. Visit the NCCMT website (www.nccmt.ca) or contact nccmt@mcmaster.ca for more information.
This webinar on evidence-informed decision-making, delivered jointly by NCCMT and NCCID, draws on the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) seven-step process, with reference to how methods and tools for each step can apply to infectious disease prevention.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Economic Evaluation of the Electronic Palliative Care Coordination System (EP...NHS Improving Quality
As part of our work on End of Life Care, an Economic Evaluation of the Electronic Palliative Care Coordination System (EPaCCS) Early Implementer Sites was undertaken. The evaluation includes quantifying impact from implementation, co-ordination of care and the economic case for EPaCCS.
Riff: A Social Network and Collaborative Platform for Public Health Disease S...Taha Kass-Hout, MD, MS
A hybrid (event-based and indicator-based) platform designed to streamline the collaboration between domain experts and machine learning algorithms for detection, prediction and response to health-related events (such as disease outbreaks or pandemics). The platform helps synthesize health-related event indicators from a wide variety of information sources (structured and unstructured) into a consolidated picture for analysis, maintenance of “community-wide coherence”, and collaboration processes. The platform offers features to detect anomalies, visualize clusters of potential events, predict the rate and spread of a disease outbreak and provide decision makers with tools, methodologies and processes to investigate the event.
Patient Engagement in Health Economic and Outcomes Research: Current and Future ISPOR Initiatives, presentation from the ISPOR 20th International meeting Philadelphia, May 2015, by the Patient Centered Special Interest Group
Interoperability, pop up uni, 10am, 3 september 2015NHS England
Expo is the most significant annual health and social care event in the calendar, uniting more NHS and care leaders, commissioners, clinicians, voluntary sector partners, innovators and media than any other health and care event.
Expo 15 returned to Manchester and was hosted once again by NHS England. Around 5000 people a day from health and care, the voluntary sector, local government, and industry joined together at Manchester Central Convention Centre for two packed days of speakers, workshops, exhibitions and professional development.
This year, Expo was more relevant and engaging than ever before, happening within the first 100 days of the new Government, and almost 12 months after the publication of the NHS Five Year Forward View. It was also a great opportunity to check on and learn from the progress of Greater Manchester as the area prepares to take over a £6 billion devolved health and social care budget, pledging to integrate hospital, community, primary and social care and vastly improve health and well-being.
More information is available online: www.expo.nhs.uk
Using Social Media to Support Youth Healthy Sexual BehaviorYTH
Erin Wright of the mHealth Impact Laboratory at the Colorado School of Public Health, provides an overview of Just/Us, a study to analyze the impact of social networking sites to effectively support healthy sexual behavior for young people. Presented at YTH Live 2014 session "Social Media for Sexual Health Outreach."
The use of Information and Communication Technology to support South African ...Michael Rowe
This is the first conference presentation I ever gave. It was in 2008 at the South African Association of Health Educators (SAAHE) conference at Stellenbosch University.
I came across it just now and thought I'd put it up here, just for the sake of being complete.
Patient involvement in clinical research and long term conditions -what can b...Nowgen
"Patient involvement in clinical research and long term conditions -what can be achieved by working in partnership", presented by Dr. J. Paul Schofield, ABPI, at EUPATI-UK Network Conference on 6 March 2014 in Leeds, UK
Remote Monitoring of Rheumatoid Arthritis using a Smartphone app3GDR
Dr Lynn Austin, Research Fellow, University of Manchester:
https://mhealthinsight.com/2016/06/27/join-us-at-the-kings-funds-digital-health-care-congress/
This poster on Database Trial Success Through Community Organizing was presented at the Medical Library Association Conference in May, 2015 in Austin, Texas.
This webinar on evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) draws on The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT)'s seven-step process, with reference to methods and tools for each step that are specific to mental health practice.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) is one of six National Collaborating Centres for Public Health in the country with a collective mandate to strengthen public health in Canada. Visit the NCCMT website (www.nccmt.ca) or contact nccmt@mcmaster.ca for more information.
This webinar on evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) draws on The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT)'s seven-step process, with reference to methods and tools for each step that are specific to healthy weights.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada. Visit the NCCMT website (www.nccmt.ca) or contact nccmt@mcmaster.ca for more information.
This webinar on evidence-informed decision-making, delivered jointly by NCCMT and NCCID, draws on the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) seven-step process, with reference to how methods and tools for each step can apply to infectious disease prevention.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
This webinar on evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) draws on The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT)'s seven-step process, with reference to methods and tools for each step that are specific to injury prevention.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Join Dr. Susan Snelling and Mr. Daniel Fong for a practice-oriented discussion of how public health professionals can adapt information and implement and evaluate policy change.
This webinar draws on the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) seven-step process for evidence-informed public health, with a focus on the process by which research evidence can be adapted to local context and then implemented and evaluated.
As an example, the discussion draws on a collaboration between the National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (NCCEH) and Saskatoon Health Region (SHR) that aimed to protect vulnerable residents of long-term care facilities (LTCFs) from the adverse health effects of chronic carbon monoxide (CO) exposure. The SHR CO monitoring policy was examined in consultation with stakeholders to promote a health-protective CO management strategy in LTCFs, followed by an evaluation of its implementation and utility in identifying elevated indoor CO.
Finally, experience and knowledge gained from this process was distilled into the Carbon Monoxide (CO) Monitoring and Response Framework and tools were developed for implementing and evaluating the framework in LTCFs across Canada.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Interested in a standardized process to appraise and synthesize research evidence?
Are you engaged in utilizing sources of high quality literature to support your decision-making process? Are you interested in learning about critical appraisal of interventions studies? The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies can help!
The process for systematically reviewing the literature and associated tool were developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) at McMaster University.
How can the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies help you?
The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies can be applied to articles of any public health topic area, such as the promotion of family and sexual health and the prevention of chronic disease, injuries and substance misuse. It can help you to assess study quality and develop recommendations for study findings. The critical appraisal method and associated tool are suitable for use by public health researchers, practitioners and policymakers.
The Policy Readiness Tool: Understanding a Municipality’s Readiness for Policy Change and Strategies for Taking Action can help you determine a municipalities, communities or organizations level of readiness for policy change. The tool is appropriate for anyone interested in encouraging health public policy development, including policy developers, advocates, community organizations, community members, and municipalities.
The Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies includes:
•A seven-step method to guide knowledge synthesis;
•A multi-criteria tool for conducting knowledge synthesis;
•A reviewer’s dictionary to assist reviewers and maintain standardized results.
To see the summary statement of this tool developed by NCCMT, click here: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/14
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
What knowledge, skills and attitudes do you need to be a successful public health practitioner?
The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) has outlined what they call the “basic building blocks of public health education and professional development” in their Core Competencies.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) has created a new tool on its website to help busy practitioners find the many resources available from the NCCMT that can support PHAC’s Core Competencies for Public Health in Canada. This tool helps individuals and organizations find NCCMT resources related to each competency so they can plan professional development activities tailored to their own needs or those of their team.
Click here to access the tool: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/phac-mapping
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is excited to present a two-part webinar featuring the Policy Readiness Tool
Part 1: Overview of the Policy Readiness Tool
(ALSO ON YOUTUBE: https://youtu.be/FPzViyniKDQ)
Learn how the Policy Readiness Tool was developed and how to use the tool in your practice.
(Part 2 is available here: http://www.slideshare.net/NCCMT/nccmt-webinar-policy-readiness-tool-part-2)
A summary statement of this tool developed by NCCMT is available here: http://www.nccmt.ca/registry/view/eng/144.html
Presented by the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) with guests:
Candace Nykiforuk, PhD, CE, Associate Professor, School of Public Health, University of Alberta; CIHR/PHAC/AIHS Applied Public Health Chair
and
Kayla Atkey, MSc, Policy Analyst, Alberta Policy Coalition for Chronic Disease Prevention (APCCP)
NCCMT is one of six NCCs for Public Health in Canada. More on the NCCs at www.nccph.ca. Production of this webinar has been made possible through a financial contribution from the Public Health Agency of Canada. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
Interested in a tool to appraise all types of public health evidence?
Do you appraise public health evidence? Are you interested in a single tool that can appraise many different types of evidence and study designs? Join us for a webinar to learn about the MetaQAT.
This tool was developed by Public Health Ontario.
How can the MetaQAT help you?
Many different types of evidence and study designs may be used to answer a single public health question. The MetaQAT provides a single process that can be used to appraise these different types of evidence. This supports the use of evidence to formulate recommendations and develop public health actions.
The MetaQAT consists of a four domain appraisal framework that includes relevance, reliability, validity, and applicability. A suite of design-specific companion tools are included to provide further guidance to assess validity of common designs.
This webinar includes an overview of the MetaQAT by its developer, Dr. Laura Rosella, followed by a presentation from Dr. Catherine Bornbaum, who used the MetaQAT in conducting a systematic review.
To see the summary statement of this tool developed by NCCMT, click here: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/243
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) hosts its popular student-led webinar on evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in public health programs. During this webinar, students and recent graduates showcase how they use EIDM tools and resources. Watch this webinar to learn how the NCCMT’s accessible and informative resources can support your coursework, practicums and future public health careers. This webinar features current students and recent graduates from Master of Public Health (MPH) and other graduate programs in Canada who share their experiences using evidence in their work.
Rapid reviews in public health
As public health organizations across Canada adopt and implement evidence-informed approaches to public health decision-making, there is a need for up to date evidence that can be applied to local contexts. While the most rigorous approach is to find or do a systematic review, timelines and resources often dictate a rapid review of the literature. Rapid reviews are tailored for a shorter timeline, but still use rigorous and transparent methodology to ensure that the best available research evidence is used in decision making.
How can the Rapid Review Guidebook help you?
The NCCMT has developed a Rapid Review Guidebook that details each step in the rapid review process, with notes on how to tailor the process given resource limitations. The Guidebook also includes a guide to writing the final report, with details on how to structure the report and what to include in each section.
Click here to access the method: http://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-repositories/search/308
There is a 'Links to Supporting Rapid Review Tools' resource available to assist in the rapid review process: https://www.slideshare.net/NCCMT/rapid-review-guidebook-links-to-supporting-tools
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
The Applicability and Transferability Tool helps you determine whether the evidence you find can be applied to your own local situation. Find the A&T tool on the NCCMT website: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/publications/9
NCCMT is one of six NCCs for Public Health in Canada. More on the NCCs at www.nccph.ca. Production of this webinar has been made possible through a financial contribution from the Public Health Agency of Canada. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
Within the context of public health, evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) is the process of finding, distilling and disseminating the best available evidence from research, context and experience, and using that evidence to inform and improve public health practice and policy. It involves assessing the quality of the research evidence you find, applying the best available evidence to your question, problem or issue, and evaluating its impact on practice.
Developed by Health EvidenceTM, the Evidence-Informed Decision Making Checklist helps public health professionals succinctly document how you and/or your team worked through the EIDM process so you can share that information with senior management. Having a Checklist on file can help your organization implement the results of your evidence.
The fillable checklist includes such critical elements as:
•Was a clear answerable search question developed?
•Was a comprehensive search strategy employed to find the best available evidence to address this question?
•Was quality assessment conducted on relevant evidence?
•What were the results of the review of the evidence?
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Do you need help with quality appraisal of different types of non-research evidence? This webinar will walk you through case examples showing how to use NCCMT’s Quality Assessment of Community Evidence (QACE) and Resource Planning and Assessment (RPA) tools to assess the quality of contextual evidence, including local health issues, community and political preferences and actions, and financial and human resources. Alongside the webinar, we are offering Knowledge Brokering mentorship to support post-webinar use of the tools.
The Population and Public Health team at the BC Centre for Disease Control undertook a project to support the integration of data into the community health planning process in British Columbia.
Interested in learning how to evaluate your policy influence?
Do you promote the uptake and dissemination of population health interventions? Are you interested in exploring public health–related case studies of policy influence? The Guide to Policy-Influence Evaluation can help!
This guide was developed by the Public Health Agency of Canada’s Innovation Strategy and produced by Cathexis Consulting.
How can the Guide to Policy-Influence Evaluation help you?
The Guide to Policy-Influence Evaluation was developed to help organizations use policy influence to improve the uptake and evaluation of evidence-based population health interventions. This process is divided into the four steps of evaluation planning. Each step includes two or more resources to support it. The resources are then summarized and important highlights are presented as they related to each step.
This webinar includes an overview of the Guide by its developers, followed by a presentation from a community based organization who evaluated the impact on policies within their work to promote healthier weights.
The Guide to Policy-Influence Evaluation includes three public health–related case studies:
•Healthy weights among Aboriginal children and youth
•Anti-bullying for primary schools
•Food security and healthy weights
To see the summary statement of this method developed by NCCMT, click here: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/241
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Join us for a discussion of methods and tools that can be used to support evidence-informed decision making in the context of health equity. Learn about resources to help you apply health equity principles to planning processes that contribute to evidence informed public health.
Guest speakers from Niagara Region Public Health discussed the use of the 10 promising practices to address health equity. This included the results of a qualitative study to identify barriers and facilitators, and provided recommendations for strengthening planning and implementation practice to improve health equity.
This webinar is jointly produced by the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) and the National Collaborating Centre for Determinants of Health (NCCDH), and is supported through funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada.
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Interested in sharing best practices within your organization?
Are you engaged in creating community health status reports? Are you interested in learning about how to improve health equity? The Equity-Integrated Population Health Status Reporting Action Framework can help health professionals at all levels identify and implement manageable steps for integrating equity into existing or new public health status reporting processes. The framework is suitable for use by health/public health staff, community organizations that provide local data, and academic researchers.
This framework was developed collaboratively by the six National Collaborating Centres for Public Health, building upon earlier work by the NCC for Determinants of Health.
To see the summary statement of this tool developed by NCCMT, click here: http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/240
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools is funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada and affiliated with McMaster University. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada.
NCCMT is one of six National Collaborating Centres (NCCs) for Public Health. The Centres promote and improve the use of scientific research and other knowledge to strengthen public health practices and policies in Canada.
Keeping It Real:Resources for Implementing Evidence-based Public Health Progr...MargaretFarrell
Through this workshop, participants will
not only become familiar with how to use the tools they need to identity and address health outcomes, but
understand the benefits of virtual communities of practice as a means to engage researchers and practitioners around implementing cancer control programs.
will introduce participants to the Cancer Control P.L.A.N.E.T portal and the Research to Reality Community of Practice. (#NCIR2R)
Presentation given at the NATIONAL HEALTH OUTREACH CONFERENCE (#NHOC) Promoting Connections to Create Healthy Individuals, Families and Communities May 8, 2015
The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools hosts its popular student-led webinar on evidence-informed decision making (EIDM) in public health programs. During this webinar, students and recent graduates showcase how they are using EIDM tools and resources. This webinar features current students and recent graduates from Master of Public Health (MPH) and other graduate programs in Canada who share their experiences using evidence in their work.
Similar to Public Health Students get a head start with Evidence-informed Public Health! (20)
Joignez-vous aux lauréates 2024 des Bourses d’application des connaissances pour étudiants du Centre de collaboration nationale en santé publique (CCNMO) afin de prendre directement connaissance de leurs travaux essentiels permettant de combler l’écart entre la recherche et la pratique. Ces étudiantes et ces nouvelles diplômées dirigent des stratégies d’application des connaissances novatrices. Cette séance souligne leur excellence scolaire et met de l’avant des stratégies uniques et transférables pour s’attaquer aux priorités actuelles en matière de santé publique.
Hannah Bayne, Université de l’Alberta – Supporting tomorrow’s stewards: A knowledge mobilization project for climate-health literacy in Alberta elementary schools [Soutenir les intendants et intendantes de demain : un projet de mobilisation des connaissances en faveur de la littératie climat-santé dans les écoles primaires de l’Alberta]
Miranda Field, Université de Regina – Decolonized theory of place [La théorie du lieu décolonisée]
Jordan Chin, Université McMaster – The art of creation: An arts-based knowledge translation method to promote and advocate for a healthy start to life [L’art de la création : une méthode d’application des connaissances fondée sur les arts pour promouvoir et défendre un bon départ en santé]
Join the winners of the 2024 National Collaborating Centre for Public Health (NCCPH) Knowledge Translation Student Awards and get a first-hand look at their crucial work in bridging the gap between research and practice. These students are leading innovative knowledge translation strategies. This session highlights their academic excellence and features unique and transferable strategies to address today’s public health priorities.
Hannah Bayne, University of Alberta - Supporting Tomorrow’s Stewards: A Knowledge Mobilization Project for Climate-Health Literacy in Alberta Elementary Schools
Miranda Field, University of Regina - Decolonized Theory of Place
Jordan Chin, McMaster University - The Art of Creation: an Arts-Based Knowledge Translation Method to Promote and Advocate for a Healthy Start to Life
Avez-vous besoin d’aide pour évaluer la qualité de différents types de données probantes non issues de la recherche? Ce webinaire vous guidera à travers des exemples de cas montrant la manière d’utiliser l’Outil d’évaluation de la qualité des données probantes issues de la communauté (ÉQDPIC) et l'outil de planification et d’évaluation des ressources (PÉR) pour évaluer la qualité des données probantes contextuelles, y compris les problèmes de santé locaux, les préférences et les actions communautaires et politiques, ainsi que les ressources financières et humaines. Dans le but de soutenir l’utilisation de ces outils après le webinaire, nous offrons du mentorat en courtage de connaissances.
Le CCNMO se réjouit d’organiser son populaire webinaire étudiant sur la prise de décision éclairée par des données probantes (PDÉDP) dans les programmes de santé publique. Dans ce webinaire, des étudiants et de récents diplômés montreront les manières dont ils utilisent des outils et des ressources en matière de PDÉDP. Les habiletés en matière de PDÉDP sont très recherchées sur le marché du travail. Participez à ce webinaire pour découvrir les manières dont les ressources accessibles et enrichissantes du CCNMO peuvent vous soutenir dans vos cours, vos stages et votre future carrière en santé publique. Profitez de cette occasion d’apprendre d’autres étudiants et de récents diplômés. Ce webinaire fera participer des étudiants actuels et de récents diplômés de programmes de maîtrise en santé publique (M.P.H.) au Canada qui parleront de leurs expériences d’utilisation des données probantes dans leur travail.
Joignez-vous aux lauréates des Bourses d’application des connaissances pour étudiants du Centre de collaboration nationale en santé publique (CCNSP) afin de prendre directement connaissance de leurs travaux essentiels permettant de combler l’écart entre la recherche et la pratique. Ces étudiantes et ces nouvelles diplômées dirigent des stratégies d’application des connaissances novatrices. Cette séance souligne leur excellence scolaire et met de l’avant des stratégies uniques et transférables pour s’attaquer aux priorités actuelles en matière de santé publique.
Jorden Hendry, Université de la Colombie-Britannique – « Les instructions sont fournies : comprendre et mettre en œuvre les engagements fondamentaux pris envers les peuples autochtones par le Bureau du médecin hygiéniste provincial de la Colombie-Britannique »;
Karen Wong, Université de la Colombie-Britannique – « Une description des manières dont les travaux universitaires mettent en œuvre des stratégies d’application des connaissances en santé publique »;
Leah Taylor, Université Western – « Tout le monde peut jouer : une ressource en application des connaissances pour promouvoir la participation à l’activité physique chez les enfants vivant avec un handicap à London (Ontario) ».
Join the winners of the National Collaborating Centre for Public Health (NCCPH) Knowledge Translation (KT) Student Awards and get a first-hand look at their crucial work in bridging the gap between research and practice. These students and recent graduates are leading innovative knowledge translation strategies. This session highlights their academic excellence and features unique and transferable strategies to address today’s public health priorities.
Jorden Hendry, University of British Columbia – Instructions have been provided: Understanding and implementing Foundational Commitments to Indigenous Peoples in the BC Office of the Provincial Health Officer.
Karen Wong, University of British Columbia – Description of how academic work implements public health knowledge translation strategies.
Leah Taylor, Western University – Everyone Can Play: A Knowledge Translation Resource to Promote Physical Activity Participation of Children with Disabilities in London, Ontario.
Une grande incertitude découle de l’apparition de nouvelles maladies infectieuses comme la COVID-19, ce qui pose des défis uniques en matière de communication, différents d’autres initiatives de communication en santé. Une communication de crise efficace est essentielle à la promotion des comportements de prévention recommandés (comme la distanciation physique, l’hygiène des mains, le port du masque et la vaccination) et au maintien de la confiance durant la crise. Cette séance présentera un survol des meilleures pratiques en matière de communication de crise en santé publique dans les médias sociaux et abordera leur application concrète durant la COVID-19. D’abord, les meilleures pratiques en ce qui a trait à une communication de crise efficace pour démontrer que l’on est digne de confiance seront présentées. Le guide de communication de crise dans les médias sociaux, largement diffusé et téléchargé, offre des conseils pratiques en matière de santé publique. Par la suite, la communication de crise de Santé publique Ottawa dans les médias sociaux durant la COVID-19 sera examinée pour mettre en évidence les leçons tirées et les principales stratégies utilisées par l’équipe. Le compte Twitter de Santé publique Ottawa est le compte d’une autorité locale de santé publique le plus suivi en Amérique du Nord, et l’excellence de son travail dans les médias sociaux tout au long de la pandémie de COVID-19 a été soulignée par des organisations comme l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada, l’Organisation mondiale de la Santé, la Fondation Rockefeller et plusieurs autres.
High levels of uncertainty result from emerging infectious diseases like COVID-19, creating unique communication challenges that are different from other health communication initiatives. Effective crisis communication is essential to promote the recommended prevention behaviors (e.g., physical distancing, hand hygiene, mask-wearing, and vaccination) and to maintain trust during the crisis. The Guidebook for Social Media Crisis Communication has been widely shared and downloaded, providing practical advice for public health. This session will provide an overview of best practices for social media crisis communication for public health and its practical application during COVID-19. First, the best practices for effective crisis communication to demonstrate trustworthiness will be presented. Next, Ottawa Public Health’s social media crisis communication during COVID-19 will be explored to highlight the lessons learned and key strategies the team employs. Ottawa Public Health’s Twitter account is the most-followed local public health account in North America, and their social media work throughout the COVID-19 pandemic has been lauded for its excellence by organizations like the Public Health Agency of Canada, the World Health Organization, the Rockefeller Foundation and many others.
Presenters:
Dr. Melissa MacKay, University of Guelph - Dr. Melissa MacKay is a postdoctoral scholar and Sessional Instructor for the Master of Public Health program at the University of Guelph. Her research focuses on effective health and crisis communication, with a specific focus on social media.
Kevin Parent, Ottawa Public Health - Kevin Parent has been the social media lead for Ottawa Public Health since 2018. He graduated from Carleton University with a major in Communications and a minor in Sociology. Kevin is perpetually tired due to having 3 young children, and he loves coffee for the same reason.
Cette séance présentera un survol d’une revue exploratoire rapide, réalisée en 2022 par le Centre de collaboration nationale des méthodes et outils (CCNMO) en collaboration avec le Centre de collaboration nationale des maladies infectieuses (CCNMI), sur le rôle de la santé publique en partenariat avec des refuges offrant des services aux personnes en situation d’itinérance. La revue fait état d’exemples de collaborations entre la santé publique et des refuges pour offrir des programmes et des services de santé publique, ou pour soutenir le personnel des refuges relativement à des sujets de santé publique. Le CCNMI a utilisé cette revue dans le cadre d’un Institut explorant les possibilités d’améliorer les communications et les programmes afin qu’ils soient utiles aux clients et au personnel des refuges. Joignez-vous à nous pour en apprendre davantage sur les résultats de cette revue exploratoire rapide et pour discuter des moyens d’accroître la collaboration entre la santé publique et les refuges.
This session provides an overview of a rapid scoping review on the role of public health working with shelters serving people experiencing houselessness completed in 2022 by the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) in collaboration with the National Collaborating Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCCID). The review identified examples of public health collaborating with shelters to deliver public health programs and services, or to support shelter staff on public health topics. NCCID used the review in an Institute that explored opportunities to improve communications and programming that work for shelter clients and shelter staff. Join us to learn more about the results of this rapid scoping review, and to discuss possibilities for increased collaboration among public health and shelters.
Cette séance présentera un survol de deux ressources axées sur l’action visant à réduire les difficultés financières et à favoriser le mieux-être financier à long terme. Celles-ci ont été élaborées dans le cadre d’un partenariat international dirigé par le Centre for Healthy Communities (École de santé publique, Université de l’Alberta). Ces ressources visent à soutenir les organisations de divers secteurs et de tous les paliers de gouvernement dans la conception, la mise en œuvre et l’évaluation d’initiatives relatives aux difficultés financières et au bien-être financier. Joignez-vous à nous pour découvrir la manière dont ces ressources ont été conçues et la façon dont on peut les appliquer en pratique.
This session will provide an overview of two action-oriented resources to reduce financial strain and promote long-term financial wellbeing developed in an international partnership led by the Centre for Healthy Communities (School of Public Health, University of Alberta). The resources are meant to support organizations from diverse sectors and all levels of government in designing, implementing, and assessing/evaluating their initiatives related to financial strain and financial wellbeing. Join us to learn more about how the resources were developed and how they can be applied in practice.
Joignez-vous à Emily Belita, Ph. D., qui décrira le lancement de l’Outil de mesure des compétences en matière de prise de décision éclairée par des données probantes (PDÉDP). Cet outil d’autodéclaration comporte 27 questions visant à aider les professionnels de la santé publique à évaluer leurs connaissances, leurs habiletés, leurs attitudes/croyances et leurs comportements en matière de PDÉDP. Le recours à cette évaluation globale aidera les personnes à connaître leurs forces et les éléments qu’elles pourraient améliorer en ce qui a trait à la PDÉDP.
Join Dr. Emily Belita, PhD, as she describes the launch of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making (EIDM) Competence Measure. This self-report tool has 27 questions to help public health professionals assess knowledge, skills, attitudes/beliefs, and behaviours related to EIDM. Using this comprehensive assessment will help to highlight individual strengths and areas for development related to EIDM
Le CCNMO se réjouit d’organiser son populaire webinaire étudiant sur la prise de décision éclairée par des données probantes (PDÉDP) dans les programmes de santé publique. Dans ce webinaire, des étudiants et de récents diplômés montreront les manières dont ils utilisent des outils et des ressources en matière de PDÉDP. Les habiletés en matière de PDÉDP sont très recherchées sur le marché du travail. Participez à ce webinaire pour découvrir les manières dont les ressources accessibles et enrichissantes du CCNMO peuvent vous soutenir dans vos cours, vos stages et votre future carrière en santé publique.
Profitez de cette occasion d’apprendre d’autres étudiants et de récents diplômés. Ce webinaire fera participer des étudiants actuels et de récents diplômés de programmes de maîtrise en santé publique (M.P.H.) au Canada qui parleront de leurs expériences d’utilisation des données probantes dans leur travail.
Join the winners of the National Collaborating Centre for Public Health (NCCPH) Knowledge Translation (KT) Student Awards and get a first-hand look at their crucial work in bridging the gap between research and practice. These students and recent graduates are leading the field in terms of innovative knowledge translation strategies. This session highlights their academic excellence and features unique and transferable strategies to address today’s public health priorities.
Melissa MacKay, PhD Candidate, Public Health, University of Guelph – Maintaining trust through effective crisis communication during emerging infectious disease
Alexa Ferdinands, PhD, Health Promotion and Socio-behavioural Sciences, University of Alberta – Collaborating with youth to address weight stigma in healthcare, education and the home
Shannon Bird, MPH, Brock University – Art as a tool for promoting public and environmental health: A lesson plan for ecojustice educators
Joignez-vous aux lauréates des Bourses d’application des connaissances pour étudiants du Centre de collaboration nationale en santé publique (CCNMO) afin de prendre directement connaissance de leurs travaux essentiels permettant de combler l’écart entre la recherche et la pratique. Ces étudiantes et ces nouvelles diplômées dirigent des stratégies d’application des connaissances novatrices. Cette séance souligne leur excellence scolaire et met de l’avant des stratégies uniques et transférables pour s’attaquer aux priorités actuelles en matière de santé publique.
Melissa MacKay, candidate au doctorat, Santé publique, Université de Guelph – Maintenir la confiance grâce à une communication de crise efficace lors de l’apparition de nouvelles maladies infectieuses.
Alexa Ferdinands, Ph. D., Promotion de la santé et sciences sociocomportementales, Université de l’Alberta – Collaborer avec les jeunes pour combattre la stigmatisation associée au poids dans les soins de santé, dans le milieu de l’éducation et à la maison.
Shannon Bird, M.P.H., Université Brock – L’art comme outil de promotion de la santé publique et environnementale : un plan pédagogique pour les professionnels de l’éducation en matière d’écojustice.
Cette séance examinera les recommandations énoncées dans les lignes directrices sur l’utilisation à faible risque de la nicotine. Nous décrirons les méthodes utilisées dans l’élaboration de lignes directrices lorsqu’il n’existe pas suffisamment de données probantes primaires, et nous explorerons l’importance de multiples versions pour améliorer le travail à mesure que de nouvelles données probantes apparaissent. Enfin, nous explorerons les manières dont ces recommandations peuvent s’appliquer en pratique.
This session will investigate the Recommendations made in the Lower-Risk Nicotine Use Guidelines (LRNUG). We will describe the methods used in the development of Guidelines where there is a lack of primary evidence and explore the importance of multiple iterations to improve the work as new evidence emerges. Finally we will explore how the Recommendations may be applied in practice.
Ce webinaire présente une vision éclairée par des données probantes concernant l’établissement d’un système de données en santé publique pancanadien. Il a été commandé par le Bureau de l’Administratrice en chef de la santé publique (ACSP) à l’Agence de la santé publique du Canada afin d’éclairer le webinaire annuel 2021 de l’ACSP. L’objectif global de cette revue était de présenter des approches permettant d’établir et de maintenir les éléments favorisant le développement d’un système de données, en plus de prendre en compte les facteurs fondamentaux, comme les possibilités de coordonner et de piloter le développement et le fonctionnement d’un réseau coordonné de systèmes afin d’éclairer une vision audacieuse pour le renouvellement du système de santé publique au Canada.
Les Centres de collaboration nationale en santé publique, en partenariat avec les auteurs et le Bureau de l’ACSP, présentent ce webinaire afin de diffuser ses résultats plus largement.
More from The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (20)
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V - ROLE OF PEADIATRIC NURSE.pdfSachin Sharma
Pediatric nurses play a vital role in the health and well-being of children. Their responsibilities are wide-ranging, and their objectives can be categorized into several key areas:
1. Direct Patient Care:
Objective: Provide comprehensive and compassionate care to infants, children, and adolescents in various healthcare settings (hospitals, clinics, etc.).
This includes tasks like:
Monitoring vital signs and physical condition.
Administering medications and treatments.
Performing procedures as directed by doctors.
Assisting with daily living activities (bathing, feeding).
Providing emotional support and pain management.
2. Health Promotion and Education:
Objective: Promote healthy behaviors and educate children, families, and communities about preventive healthcare.
This includes tasks like:
Administering vaccinations.
Providing education on nutrition, hygiene, and development.
Offering breastfeeding and childbirth support.
Counseling families on safety and injury prevention.
3. Collaboration and Advocacy:
Objective: Collaborate effectively with doctors, social workers, therapists, and other healthcare professionals to ensure coordinated care for children.
Objective: Advocate for the rights and best interests of their patients, especially when children cannot speak for themselves.
This includes tasks like:
Communicating effectively with healthcare teams.
Identifying and addressing potential risks to child welfare.
Educating families about their child's condition and treatment options.
4. Professional Development and Research:
Objective: Stay up-to-date on the latest advancements in pediatric healthcare through continuing education and research.
Objective: Contribute to improving the quality of care for children by participating in research initiatives.
This includes tasks like:
Attending workshops and conferences on pediatric nursing.
Participating in clinical trials related to child health.
Implementing evidence-based practices into their daily routines.
By fulfilling these objectives, pediatric nurses play a crucial role in ensuring the optimal health and well-being of children throughout all stages of their development.
The dimensions of healthcare quality refer to various attributes or aspects that define the standard of healthcare services. These dimensions are used to evaluate, measure, and improve the quality of care provided to patients. A comprehensive understanding of these dimensions ensures that healthcare systems can address various aspects of patient care effectively and holistically. Dimensions of Healthcare Quality and Performance of care include the following; Appropriateness, Availability, Competence, Continuity, Effectiveness, Efficiency, Efficacy, Prevention, Respect and Care, Safety as well as Timeliness.
India Clinical Trials Market: Industry Size and Growth Trends [2030] Analyzed...Kumar Satyam
According to TechSci Research report, "India Clinical Trials Market- By Region, Competition, Forecast & Opportunities, 2030F," the India Clinical Trials Market was valued at USD 2.05 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.64% through 2030. The market is driven by a variety of factors, making India an attractive destination for pharmaceutical companies and researchers. India's vast and diverse patient population, cost-effective operational environment, and a large pool of skilled medical professionals contribute significantly to the market's growth. Additionally, increasing government support in streamlining regulations and the growing prevalence of lifestyle diseases further propel the clinical trials market.
Growing Prevalence of Lifestyle Diseases
The rising incidence of lifestyle diseases such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer is a major trend driving the clinical trials market in India. These conditions necessitate the development and testing of new treatment methods, creating a robust demand for clinical trials. The increasing burden of these diseases highlights the need for innovative therapies and underscores the importance of India as a key player in global clinical research.
Global launch of the Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index 2nd wave – alongside...ILC- UK
The Healthy Ageing and Prevention Index is an online tool created by ILC that ranks countries on six metrics including, life span, health span, work span, income, environmental performance, and happiness. The Index helps us understand how well countries have adapted to longevity and inform decision makers on what must be done to maximise the economic benefits that comes with living well for longer.
Alongside the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva on 28 May 2024, we launched the second version of our Index, allowing us to track progress and give new insights into what needs to be done to keep populations healthier for longer.
The speakers included:
Professor Orazio Schillaci, Minister of Health, Italy
Dr Hans Groth, Chairman of the Board, World Demographic & Ageing Forum
Professor Ilona Kickbusch, Founder and Chair, Global Health Centre, Geneva Graduate Institute and co-chair, World Health Summit Council
Dr Natasha Azzopardi Muscat, Director, Country Health Policies and Systems Division, World Health Organisation EURO
Dr Marta Lomazzi, Executive Manager, World Federation of Public Health Associations
Dr Shyam Bishen, Head, Centre for Health and Healthcare and Member of the Executive Committee, World Economic Forum
Dr Karin Tegmark Wisell, Director General, Public Health Agency of Sweden
How many patients does case series should have In comparison to case reports.pdfpubrica101
Pubrica’s team of researchers and writers create scientific and medical research articles, which may be important resources for authors and practitioners. Pubrica medical writers assist you in creating and revising the introduction by alerting the reader to gaps in the chosen study subject. Our professionals understand the order in which the hypothesis topic is followed by the broad subject, the issue, and the backdrop.
https://pubrica.com/academy/case-study-or-series/how-many-patients-does-case-series-should-have-in-comparison-to-case-reports/
Welcome to Secret Tantric, London’s finest VIP Massage agency. Since we first opened our doors, we have provided the ultimate erotic massage experience to innumerable clients, each one searching for the very best sensual massage in London. We come by this reputation honestly with a dynamic team of the city’s most beautiful masseuses.
Leading the Way in Nephrology: Dr. David Greene's Work with Stem Cells for Ki...Dr. David Greene Arizona
As we watch Dr. Greene's continued efforts and research in Arizona, it's clear that stem cell therapy holds a promising key to unlocking new doors in the treatment of kidney disease. With each study and trial, we step closer to a world where kidney disease is no longer a life sentence but a treatable condition, thanks to pioneers like Dr. David Greene.
Struggling with intense fears that disrupt your life? At Renew Life Hypnosis, we offer specialized hypnosis to overcome fear. Phobias are exaggerated fears, often stemming from past traumas or learned behaviors. Hypnotherapy addresses these deep-seated fears by accessing the subconscious mind, helping you change your reactions to phobic triggers. Our expert therapists guide you into a state of deep relaxation, allowing you to transform your responses and reduce anxiety. Experience increased confidence and freedom from phobias with our personalized approach. Ready to live a fear-free life? Visit us at Renew Life Hypnosis..
CHAPTER 1 SEMESTER V PREVENTIVE-PEDIATRICS.pdfSachin Sharma
This content provides an overview of preventive pediatrics. It defines preventive pediatrics as preventing disease and promoting children's physical, mental, and social well-being to achieve positive health. It discusses antenatal, postnatal, and social preventive pediatrics. It also covers various child health programs like immunization, breastfeeding, ICDS, and the roles of organizations like WHO, UNICEF, and nurses in preventive pediatrics.
Public Health Students get a head start with Evidence-informed Public Health!
1. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Evidence-Informed Decision Making
Methods and Tools for Students in
Public Health Programs
Susan Snelling, PhD and colleagues
October 8, 2019 1:00 – 2:30 PM EDT
2. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
2
After Today
The PowerPoint presentation in English will be
made available.
These resources will be available at:
http://www.nccmt.ca/previous-webinars
3. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Agenda
1. Introduction to the NCCMT and the NCCs
2. What is evidence-informed decision making?
3. Student perspectives: Resources to support
evidence-informed practice
4. Q and A / Discussion
3
4. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Learning Objectives
After attending this webinar, participants will:
• Be able to articulate the key features of a model for evidence-
informed decision making and a process for evidence-informed
public health.
• Know where to access tools and resources to support students
(and others) in public health to find and use best-available research
evidence in decision making.
• Appreciate the perspectives of current and recent public health
graduate students on the value of evidence-informed practice and
the tools that they have found helpful.
4
5. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
5
What is your role?
Poll Question #1
A. Undergraduate student
B. Graduate student
C. Program faculty
D. None of the above
6. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
6
How many people are watching
today’s session with you?
Poll Question #2
A. Just me
B. 2-3
C. 4-5
D. 6-10
E. >10
7. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
7
Poll Question #3
Have you visited the NCCMT
website or used its resources
before?
A. Yes
B. No
8. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
8
Poll Question #4
If you stated YES on the previous
question, how many times have
you used the NCCMT’s resources?
A. Once
B. 2-3 times
C. 4-10 times
D. 10+ times
9.
10. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
What is
Evidence-Informed Public Health?
The process of distilling and disseminating the
best available evidence from research, context and
experience, and using that evidence to inform and
improve public health practice and policy.
Put simply, it means finding, using and sharing
what works in public health.
10
11. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
A Model for Evidence-Informed
Decision-Making in Public Health
11
12. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
12
Poll Question #5
From your observation, which of
these has the greatest influence on
decisions about public health
programs?
A. Community health issues and local context
B. Research evidence
C. Community and political preferences
D. Resources (money, time, skills)
E. Public health expertise
13. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
We asked recent MPH and MHE grads…
• How are evidence-informed decision-making
(EIDM) skills important in your studies and/or in
your work in the public health field?
• What’s an EIDM resource you have found
useful?
13
14. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Our presenters:
14
Martha Andrews
Health Promoter
Public Health Sudbury & Districts
Master of Health Evaluation
University of Waterloo
Bandna Dhaliwal
Research Assistant
National Collaborating Centre for
Methods and Tools
Health Evidence™
Master of Public Health
University of Toronto
Nga Dang
Master of Public Health
Candidate
Queen’s University
15. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
How are EIDM skills important in your
studies/work in the public health field?
15
16. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
What’s an EIDM resource you have
found useful?
16
17. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Stages in the process of
Evidence-Informed Public Health
17
18. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Resources to support use of research evidence in
public health
• http://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-
repositories/search
A free, searchable, online collection of knowledge
translation methods and tools for public health
• Summary statements
• Web links (when available) to Methods and Tools
18
NCCMT Registry of Methods and Tools
19. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
19
NCCMT Registry of Methods and Tools
for Knowledge Translation
http://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-repositories/search
20. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Using the Registry:
Partnership Evaluation in Practice
Partnership Self-Assessment
Tool
https://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-
repositories/search/10
Internal Coalition
Effectiveness (ICE)
Instrument
https://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-
repositories/search/292
20
21. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Canadian Best Practices Portal
21
https://cbpp-pcpe.phac-aspc.gc.ca/
22. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Health Evidence™
www.healthevidence.org
22
23. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Demonstration of Health Evidence™
23
24. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Health Evidence™Quality Assessment Tool
24
https://healthevidence.org/documents/our-appraisal-
tools/quality-assessment-tool-dictionary-en.pdf
35. Follow us @nccmt Suivez-nous @ccnmo
Funded by the Public Health Agency of Canada | Affiliated with McMaster University
Production of this presentation has been made possible through a financial contribution from the Public Health Agency of Canada. The
views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada..
For more information about the
National Collaborating Centre
for Methods and Tools:
NCCMT website www.nccmt.ca
Contact: nccmt@mcmaster.ca
Editor's Notes
Martha
Nga
Bandna
Susan
Martha (two slides for Registry)
Martha (two slides for Registry)
Martha
They were a source of inspiration for the preparation of a partnership evaluation that was requested by a community coalition called the Mental Health and Addictions System Priority Action Table. This was an evaluation deliverable that was identified in this group’s Terms of Reference. The tools was constructed using elements from the partnership evaluation tools in the registry, the group’s Term’s of Reference as well as consultation with the group for their perception of coalition effectiveness.