Small and mid-sized enterprises (SMEs) face significant challenges in protecting profits from currency fluctuations when exporting, with 80% of UK SMEs impacted by exchange rate variations. Unlike larger corporations that have dedicated risk management teams, SMEs often lack resources and must navigate complex options for hedging currency risk, including doing nothing, opening local bank accounts, or using financial instruments. The document highlights case studies, such as Glasbau's strategies for managing currency risks, illustrating both the necessity and complexity of making informed financial decisions in international markets.

1. Supported by:
SMALL AND MID SIZED ENTERPRISES
ON THE FRONTIERS OF EXPORTING
PROTECTING PROFITS WHEN CURRENCIES FLUCTUATE

2. 1 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2015
Protecting profits when currencies fluctuate
1
Hedging FX Risk: Taking
stock of the challenge for
mid-caps and SMEs, 2014,
by the accountancy body
Association of Chartered
Certified Accountants
and Kantox, the foreign
exchange provider.
2
“Importers, Exporters, and
Exchange Rate Disconnect,”
Mary Amiti, Itskhoki Oleg,
and Jozef Konings. 2014.
American Economic Review,
104(7): 1942-78.
Protecting foreign earnings against adverse currency fluctuations once the money
is repatriated is among the knottiest issues facing small and mid-sized enterprises
(SMEs). While variations in exchange rates between the home and foreign currencies can
work in a company’s favour, they can also wipe out the entire profit from a transaction. An
estimated eight out of ten UK SMEs that export see gains or losses as a result of exchange rate
fluctuations.1
While large corporations have entire teams to help them manage these risks, smaller
companies tend to rely on one or two individuals, who may also have other duties. Larger
companies are also more likely to have subsidiaries in the destination country which both
make and receive payments in the local currency, thereby reducing the amount of revenue
subject to currency risk when repatriated.2
To deal with this risk, SMEs can choose among a range of options, which include: doing
nothing and hoping for the best; opening a bank account in the host country to make and
receive payments in the local currency; hedging the risk by using financial instruments; or
selling accounts receivable at a discount to a factoring company, which then takes on the risk
of currency fluctuation as well as the risk of non-payment by the buyer.
How do SMEs decide among the many options available? Finding objective advice on managing
foreign exchange risk is not always easy. The UK Government’s Department of Trade and
Investment, for example, does not provide specific guidance on the issue, despite making
substantial information on other export-related topics available to SMEs. UK trade bodies,
such as the British Chambers of Commerce, tend to rely on commercial foreign exchange
agencies to provide advice.
Finding a way through the maze begins with understanding an SME’s appetite for risk.
“Each business has to understand what percentage of its profits it is willing to risk, and for
how long, in its overseas ventures,” says Kevin Grant, managing director of international
payments at Moneycorp, a foreign currency exchange company. If the business understands
what level of loss from currency fluctuations it considers acceptable, it has a baseline target
for the risks it wants to manage.

3. 2 © The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2015
When an SME is new in a foreign market and expects only minor initial revenues, the “do
nothing” option may make the most sense. Currency losses should, however, be transparent.
Most accounting software packages have multi-currency functions that can automatically
calculate foreign exchange gains and losses by comparing the amount invoiced in one
currency with the amount received once it is converted into another currency. While this
information is not sufficient for planning a firm’s future currency needs—most often the
figures include bank charges which are not listed separately—it helps to quantify the gains
and losses from currency movements and to assess what strategy may be appropriate in
future.
Doing nothing—essentially deciding not to hedge—is unwise when dealing with large income
flows, says Isabel Hahn a managing director of the Frankfurt, Germany-based glass cabinets
and windows company Glasbau Hahn. “We had some big UK contracts at a time when the
value of sterling fell sharply against the euro, and we lost a lot of money because we did not
hedge,” she says. “That was our learning curve.”
To manage its currency risks more effectively, Glasbau took three measures. First, it opened
a dollar-denominated account in the US, where it has a legal presence via a New York-based
subsidiary. The account enables Glasbau to price and deliver smaller contracts (under
$100,000) in dollars. The business denominates its operating costs in the US in dollars
as well, subtracting those costs from the dollar-denominated revenues, thereby creating
a natural hedge against part of the currency risk. Second, the firm buys future exchange
instruments for larger contracts from its bank, which fix the exchange rate—and therefore
the level of expected revenue in euros—at a point when a project is expected to end. Finally,
the company offers a discount if a buyer pays upfront in euros, a strategy that has worked
particularly well in Japan.
While these three approaches have reduced Glasbau’s currency risks, some challenges
remain. Ms. Hahn says that while she makes price quotes valid for a relatively short period,
or includes a specific currency exchange rate as a condition of the offer, some public tenders
require price estimates that are valid for up to a year. This long time horizon makes it difficult
to hedge currency risks. “I have to decide on a case-by-case basis whether to participate,”
she says. A further risk arises when projects take longer than expected to complete, thereby
outliving a future option that was intended to cover the currency risk. The firm can make a
further hedge against currency fluctuation, but only at additional cost.
Where cash flow is tight, an exporter may decide to sell its foreign currency invoices
(receivables) at a discount to a factoring company. This provides the selling company with
cash up-front, and eliminates its currency exposure. But for an SME, this option creates
another type of risk, warns Mr. Grant of Moneycorp. “People buy from an SME because
they get a personal service,” he says. “If you put a third party between the seller and the
buyer, and the buyer is invoiced by this other entity which is faceless, it could devalue the
relationship between the SME and its customer.”

4. While every effort has been taken to verify the accuracy
of this information, neither The Economist Intelligence
Unit Ltd. nor Novartis can accept any responsibility or
liability for reliance by any person on this white paper or
any of the information, opinions or conclusions set out
in this white paper.

5. GENEVA
Boulevard des Tranchees 16
1206 Geneva
Switzerland
Tel: +41 22 566 24 70
E-mail: geneva@eiu.com
LONDON
25 St James’s Street
London, SW1A 1HG
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 20 7830 7000
E-mail: london@eiu.com
FRANKFURT
Hansaallee 154, “Haus Hamburg”
60320 Frankfurt am Main
Germany
Tel: +49 69 7171 880
E-mail: frankfurt@eiu.com
PARIS
6 rue Paul Baudry
Paris, 75008
France
Tel: +33 1 5393 6600
E-mail: paris@eiu.com
DUBAI
PO Box 450056
Office No 1301A
Thuraya Tower 2
Dubai Media City
United Arab Emirates
Tel: +971 4 433 4202
E-mail: dubai@eiu.com