The document discusses Creative Commons (CC), a non-profit organization that provides open copyright licenses to enable sharing and reuse of creative works. It notes CC's goal of enabling a "some rights reserved" model for content as an alternative between ignoring copyright and public good. The document also discusses how building and enabling access to a commons of shared content and resources could help advance collective intelligence and benefit society by reducing restrictions on innovation, participation, and access to information.

1. Program for the Future A Summit & Workshop on Collective Intelligence 2008-12-09 The Commons as a collective intelligence meta-innovation Mike Linksvayer Creative Commons Photo by asadal · Licensed under CC Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 · http://flickr.com/photos/68242677@N00/2117153416/

2. Creative Commons .ORG Nonprofit organization, launched to public December 2002 HQ and ccLearn in San Francisco Science Commons division at MIT ~60 international jurisdiction projects, coordinated from Berlin Foundation, corporate, and individual funding Born at Stanford, supported by Silicon Valley

3. Enabling Reasonable Copyright Space between ignoring copyright and ignoring fair use & public good Legal and technical tools enabling a “Some Rights Reserved” model Like “free software” or “open source” for content/media But with more restrictive options Media is more diverse and at least a decade(?) behind software

4. Six Mainstream Licenses

5. Lawyer Readable

6. Human Readable

7. Machine Readable <rdf:RDF xmlns=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#&quot; xmlns:rdf=&quot;http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#&quot;> <License rdf:about=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nl/&quot;> <permits rdf:resource=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction&quot;/> <permits rdf:resource=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution&quot;/> <requires rdf:resource=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#Notice&quot;/> <requires rdf:resource=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#Attribution&quot;/> <prohibits rdf:resource=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#CommercialUse&quot;/> <permits rdf:resource=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks&quot;/> <requires rdf:resource=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#ShareAlike&quot;/> </License> </rdf:RDF>

8. Machine Readable (Work) <span xmlns:cc=&quot;http://creativecommons.org/ns#&quot; xmlns:dc=&quot;http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/&quot;> <span rel=&quot; dc:type &quot; href=&quot; http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text &quot; property=&quot; dc:title &quot; > My Book </span> by <a rel=&quot; cc:attributionURL &quot; property=&quot; cc:attributionName &quot; href=&quot; http://example.org/me &quot;> My Name </a> is licensed under a <a rel=&quot; license &quot; href=&quot; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ &quot; >Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License</a>. <span rel=&quot; dc:source &quot; href=&quot; http://example.net/her_book &quot; /> Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at <a rel=&quot; cc:morePermissions &quot; href=&quot; http://example.com/revenue_sharing_agreement &quot;>example.com</a>. </span>

9. DRMfree “ DRM Voodo” by psd licensed under CC BY 2.0 http://flickr.com/photos/psd/1806247462/

10. In Innovation, Meta is Max “The max net-impact innovations, by far, have been meta-innovations, i.e., innovations that changed how fast other innovations accumulated.” Robin Hanson (Economist) http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/06/meta-is-max---i.html

11. Collective Intelligence Meta innovation?

12. Commons Meta innovation for Collective Intelligence?

13. $2.2 trillion Value of fair use in the U.S. Economy http://www.ccianet.org/artmanager/publish/news/First-Ever_Economic_Study_Calculates_Dollar_Value_of.shtml also see http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/7643

16. Cyber terrorism (Cyber terror war on) Privacy breaches Loss of Generativity Lock-in Surveillance DRM Censorship Suppression of innovation Electoral fraud

17. Threat categories Legitimate security issues Protectionism Politics and power Security theater and fear-based responses (driven by all of above, not just legitimate security issues)

18. What digital freedoms needed for beneficial collective intelligence? Keep same rights online/digitally that we (should anyway) have offline/IRL Permit innovation and participation enabled by digital world even if not possible before (probably follows from above)

19. How building the commons (free software, free culture, and friends) helps

20. Security Data shows FLOSS is more secure Security through obscurity doesn’t work FLOSS encourages a heterogeneous computing environment Free software and free culture both allergic to DRM and other mechanisms that sacrifice security to other goals

21. Protectionism Peer production undermines policy arguments for protecting knowledge industries Free software and free culture both allergic to DRM

22. Politics and power Free software and culture improve transparency ... and the ability of all to participate Peer production works against concentrated power — doesn’t require concentrated production structures and lowers barriers to entry

23. Security theater and fear Access to facts mitigates fear and allows rational evaluation of responses Commons work against three previous threats that drive security theater and fear

24. Can the success of the (digital) commons alter how we view freedom and power generally?

25. “The gate that has held the movements for equalization of human beings strictly in a dilemma between ineffectiveness and violence has now been opened. The reason is that we have shifted to a zero marginal cost world. As steel is replaced by software, more and more of the value in society becomes non-rivalrous: it can be held by many without costing anybody more than if it is held by a few.” Eben Moglen

26. “If we don’t want to live in a jungle, we must change our attitudes. We must start sending the message that a good citizen is one who cooperates when appropriate, not one who is successful at taking from others.” Richard Stallman

27. i.e., we can form collective intelligences instead of forced collectives ... and still “change the world”

29. Building the commons is key to the future of collective intelligence Politicians and corporations are unimaginative ... they need to see solutions, or they react in fear A dominant commons makes many collective stupidity scenarios much less likely Beneficial collective intelligence needs universal access to culture, educational resources, research ... in machine-readable form

30. Much less Meta ... 2 of the excellent bootstrap(?) tools CC uses and builds Semantic MediaWiki ... turn your MediaWiki into a database and database application platform RDFa ... bridging the Semantic Web and the Web we all use

31. License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ Attribution Author: Mike Linksvayer Link: http://creativecommons.org Questions? [email_address] Detail of image by psd · Licensed under CC Attribution 2.0 · http://flickr.com/photos/psd/1805374441