What is good action
research?
Reflections on Elliott's – What is Good Action Research?
By W.P.N Pietrek
The Main features
• Pedagogical aim and ideal to which all participants are committed to realising in
practice
• The changing of practice to reflect the pedagogical aim
• Gathering of evidence
• Awareness of inconsistencies between aspiration and practice problematises the
assumptions and beliefs which underpin practice in classrooms
• The testing of new approaches to realise aspirations which will in turn reconstruct
theories and guide future practice
• Teacher reflexivity
• The essence of good action research is identifying an issue and developing
responses to address it in practice.
• A key test of the effectiveness of action research – 'does it improve
interaction between teacher and pupil?'
• If there is no evidence that research is bringing about positive changes to
practice, then it is dubious that it is effective action research – effective
action research should "fuse teaching and research into a singular activity".
Impact on the curriculum
• Effective action research should impact upon the curriculum:
• It should examine how content within subjects is best delivered
• Always consider how your subject is best articulated
Where does the data come from?
• Action research needs to be reflexive as well as reflective.
• Data needs to come from a wide range of perspectives:
• Teachers' own accounts of their practice
• Students' accounts of their teachers' practice
• Peer observations
• Outsiders' observational accounts of their children's experiences
• Video and audio recordings of interactions between teachers and pupils
Quality indicators to be defined by action research
• Cannot predefine quality indicators. The task of action research is to define
them.
• The quest is to qualify what constitutes good practice and the research of
this is what will establish the indicators for quality.

Presentation elliott

  • 1.
    What is goodaction research? Reflections on Elliott's – What is Good Action Research? By W.P.N Pietrek
  • 2.
    The Main features •Pedagogical aim and ideal to which all participants are committed to realising in practice • The changing of practice to reflect the pedagogical aim • Gathering of evidence • Awareness of inconsistencies between aspiration and practice problematises the assumptions and beliefs which underpin practice in classrooms • The testing of new approaches to realise aspirations which will in turn reconstruct theories and guide future practice • Teacher reflexivity
  • 3.
    • The essenceof good action research is identifying an issue and developing responses to address it in practice. • A key test of the effectiveness of action research – 'does it improve interaction between teacher and pupil?' • If there is no evidence that research is bringing about positive changes to practice, then it is dubious that it is effective action research – effective action research should "fuse teaching and research into a singular activity".
  • 4.
    Impact on thecurriculum • Effective action research should impact upon the curriculum: • It should examine how content within subjects is best delivered • Always consider how your subject is best articulated
  • 5.
    Where does thedata come from? • Action research needs to be reflexive as well as reflective. • Data needs to come from a wide range of perspectives: • Teachers' own accounts of their practice • Students' accounts of their teachers' practice • Peer observations • Outsiders' observational accounts of their children's experiences • Video and audio recordings of interactions between teachers and pupils
  • 6.
    Quality indicators tobe defined by action research • Cannot predefine quality indicators. The task of action research is to define them. • The quest is to qualify what constitutes good practice and the research of this is what will establish the indicators for quality.