This document provides an overview of library resources and services available to NHS staff to help practice evidence-based medicine. It discusses the library collections, databases, and training programs available. Key services include access to books, journals, databases through OpenAthens, reference management support, and a four part information skills training program covering induction, searching, current awareness, and critical appraisal. The training program teaches skills for finding and evaluating evidence using a systematic approach to answer clinical questions and apply results to practice.
This document provides tips for increasing citations of one's research, including using succinct titles with colons and carefully chosen keywords, publishing review articles and open access papers, presenting work at conferences, promoting work on social media and altmetrics platforms, and publishing on hot topics. Consistently formatting one's name and only citing previous relevant work can also help increase citations.
SSC in Evidence Based Medicine - Evaluating the evidencePaulaFunnell
This document provides guidance on evaluating medical research evidence. It discusses the importance of critically appraising research to identify the most valid and useful studies given limitations like publication bias. Key factors to consider when reviewing research include the study design, results presentation, and statistical significance. Forest plots and p-values are explained as tools to assess results. The document encourages using established checklists to systematically evaluate strengths and weaknesses of studies before applying results in clinical practice.
SSC in Evidence Based Medicine - Internet resources PaulaFunnell
This document provides guidance on different categories of internet sources for medical information. It discusses web search engines that search across high-quality medical websites. It also describes electronic databases that contain large collections of published research references that can be filtered and searched. Finally, it outlines clinical summary resources that synthesize evidence from primary research and present it concisely.
This document provides an overview of evidence-based healthcare and how to search for evidence using online resources. It discusses formulating a clinical question using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), and focuses on key resources like DynaMED Plus, Clinical Evidence, Cochrane Library, and NICE Evidence Search to find the best available evidence to answer clinical questions. Contact information is provided for the St. George's Library research enquiries desk and liaison librarians who can help with evidence searches.
Do Citations and Readership Predict Excellent Publications?Dasha Herrmannova
This document discusses research into whether current metrics like citations and readership are sufficient to identify highly influential papers. The authors created a dataset of 314 papers labeled as either seminal works or survey papers based on a questionnaire. They then used this dataset to classify papers based on citations and readership, finding that citations provided a somewhat better prediction of influence than readership alone. However, neither metric was deemed optimal. The authors conclude that an ideal dataset and alternative metrics that examine citation context and content are needed to better measure research impact.
'Not just the usual books...5 useful things that HE libraries offer students' Introduces some of the services and resources that university libraries offer students
The document discusses systematic reviewing and searching for evidence, including:
- The 8 key stages of a systematic review including formulating a question and locating studies through searching.
- Choosing appropriate databases based on topic, such as Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO.
- Developing a search strategy using techniques like Boolean operators, truncation, subject headings, and filters.
- Demonstrations of searching Embase including developing search terms, applying limits, and managing results.
- Tips for accessing full text articles and getting additional help with the review process.
This document provides information about library resources and services available to support final year students with their dissertation research. It outlines the role of the library, key collections and research tools, as well as specialist library services for dissertation research such as interlibrary loans and referencing support. The librarian, Stuart Smith, will lead a session to refresh students on library services, discuss developing a dissertation topic and title, and provide tips for effective search strategies and use of information sources in their research.
This document provides tips for increasing citations of one's research, including using succinct titles with colons and carefully chosen keywords, publishing review articles and open access papers, presenting work at conferences, promoting work on social media and altmetrics platforms, and publishing on hot topics. Consistently formatting one's name and only citing previous relevant work can also help increase citations.
SSC in Evidence Based Medicine - Evaluating the evidencePaulaFunnell
This document provides guidance on evaluating medical research evidence. It discusses the importance of critically appraising research to identify the most valid and useful studies given limitations like publication bias. Key factors to consider when reviewing research include the study design, results presentation, and statistical significance. Forest plots and p-values are explained as tools to assess results. The document encourages using established checklists to systematically evaluate strengths and weaknesses of studies before applying results in clinical practice.
SSC in Evidence Based Medicine - Internet resources PaulaFunnell
This document provides guidance on different categories of internet sources for medical information. It discusses web search engines that search across high-quality medical websites. It also describes electronic databases that contain large collections of published research references that can be filtered and searched. Finally, it outlines clinical summary resources that synthesize evidence from primary research and present it concisely.
This document provides an overview of evidence-based healthcare and how to search for evidence using online resources. It discusses formulating a clinical question using PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome), and focuses on key resources like DynaMED Plus, Clinical Evidence, Cochrane Library, and NICE Evidence Search to find the best available evidence to answer clinical questions. Contact information is provided for the St. George's Library research enquiries desk and liaison librarians who can help with evidence searches.
Do Citations and Readership Predict Excellent Publications?Dasha Herrmannova
This document discusses research into whether current metrics like citations and readership are sufficient to identify highly influential papers. The authors created a dataset of 314 papers labeled as either seminal works or survey papers based on a questionnaire. They then used this dataset to classify papers based on citations and readership, finding that citations provided a somewhat better prediction of influence than readership alone. However, neither metric was deemed optimal. The authors conclude that an ideal dataset and alternative metrics that examine citation context and content are needed to better measure research impact.
'Not just the usual books...5 useful things that HE libraries offer students' Introduces some of the services and resources that university libraries offer students
The document discusses systematic reviewing and searching for evidence, including:
- The 8 key stages of a systematic review including formulating a question and locating studies through searching.
- Choosing appropriate databases based on topic, such as Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO.
- Developing a search strategy using techniques like Boolean operators, truncation, subject headings, and filters.
- Demonstrations of searching Embase including developing search terms, applying limits, and managing results.
- Tips for accessing full text articles and getting additional help with the review process.
This document provides information about library resources and services available to support final year students with their dissertation research. It outlines the role of the library, key collections and research tools, as well as specialist library services for dissertation research such as interlibrary loans and referencing support. The librarian, Stuart Smith, will lead a session to refresh students on library services, discuss developing a dissertation topic and title, and provide tips for effective search strategies and use of information sources in their research.
This document provides an overview of navigating clinical information resources. It discusses:
1) The large volume of new MEDLINE articles published daily, including over 1500 new articles and 60 randomized trials.
2) How to access resources like PubMed and select the appropriate resource for different needs such as systematic reviews, guidelines, or time-limited searches.
3) Techniques for searching clinical questions quickly or through advanced searching, and setting up email alerts to stay current.
This document provides guidance on developing a search strategy for a systematic review. It discusses defining key concepts to search, identifying appropriate sources and search terms, using Boolean operators and limits to combine terms, and tips for conducting, recording, and reporting searches. The goal is to comprehensively and systematically identify all relevant evidence to answer the review question while minimizing bias. Developing an effective search strategy is a crucial step in the systematic review process.
This document discusses academic writing and referencing. It introduces plagiarism and how to avoid it using citations and references. Formatting guidelines are provided for different types of references, including books, book chapters, and journal articles. Students are instructed to use EndNote software to organize their references and generate in-text citations and bibliographies in Word documents. Activities are outlined for students to practice identifying reference elements, entering references into EndNote, and using EndNote's "Cite While You Write" function with a provided exercise.
The document provides an overview of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing significant research on a particular topic and placing one's own research question in the context of previous and current studies. The purpose is to evaluate research, recognize relevant sources, synthesize studies, and help answer the research question. It also discusses developing search strategies, evaluating sources, and writing the review. Key steps include formulating a question, identifying search terms, searching databases, appraising sources, and recording search methods.
Clinical Microbiology - searching for informationPaulaFunnell
This document provides an introduction to searching for medical information through the Queen Mary University library website and various databases and search tools. It outlines key learning objectives around using the library website, searching online for quality health information, and effectively using medical databases and EndNote. Specific databases and search engines introduced include Evidence Search, TRIP, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library. Search techniques like broadening terms, narrowing searches, phrase searching, and subject headings are also covered.
The academic impact of research: Current and the future citation trends in de...Nader Ale Ebrahim
Nader Ale Ebrahim presents on research impact and citation trends in developing countries. He discusses how familiarity with research tools can help increase citations and h-index. Developing countries currently lag behind in impact points and h-index compared to developed nations. However, using research tools to increase visibility can help close this gap over time by improving citation records. The future may see developing countries' current status become the future perspectives of other nations.
This document provides an overview of resources for searching for medical and health-related information. It introduces the Queen Mary University library website and search tools, as well as healthcare-specific search engines like Medline Plus and Evidence Search that search across high-quality web resources. It also describes medical databases like PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus that contain vast collections of published research articles and references. Strategies for broadening and narrowing database searches are also discussed.
This document provides guidance on writing a successful research proposal. It discusses including an introduction that establishes the problem being addressed and how the research will achieve its objectives. The methodology section should describe the research design, data collection instruments, participants, and analysis plan. Other important sections are aims and objectives, timeline, budget, and references. The proposal should convince reviewers that the research is feasible, addresses an important question, and is led by an appropriate investigator.
This document provides an overview of a workshop on using the Cochrane Library to train health librarians. The workshop covers introductions, an overview of Cochrane and systematic reviews, a demonstration of searching the Cochrane Library database, and small group work. Participants learn about finding and critically appraising systematic reviews to help inform evidence-based healthcare practices and decisions.
This document provides guidance on publishing in top-ranked journals (Q1). It discusses selecting the best target journal, writing strategies, manuscript sections, and the peer review process. The goal is to help researchers understand how to develop high-quality manuscripts that stand the best chance of being accepted in top journals.
The document provides guidance on how to conduct peer reviews of academic papers. It discusses what peer review is, how the process works, the roles and responsibilities of peer reviewers, factors to consider when deciding whether to accept a review invitation, questions reviewers should ask, criteria to focus on during reviews, best practices, and how to make decisions on manuscripts. The document aims to help new reviewers understand peer review and provide thoughtful, constructive feedback to improve papers.
Publishing Scientific Research and How to Write High-Impact Research Papersjjuhlrich
The document is a presentation about publishing scientific research and writing high-impact papers. It discusses John Uhlrich's background and role as an editor at Wiley-VCH. It provides tips for selecting journals, writing cover letters, responding to referee reports, and promoting published work. The presentation emphasizes communicating the importance and implications of research, comparing results to related work, and optimizing content for discovery online.
This is the PowerPoint of the short-term training programme conducted at MGR university by Dr.S.Vijayakumar of Crescent University. The talk focussed on the following aspects
Kinds of Research
How to write an Abstract
How to write Keywords
How to write an Effective Introduction
Reporting Methods
Writing the Results
Writing the Discussion section
How to Integrate Tables and Figures in your research paper.
Reference Management-Introduction to Mendeley
10-1. How to get your manuscript published? Elena Levtchenko (eng)KidneyOrgRu
This document provides guidance on how to get a manuscript published in a peer-reviewed journal. It discusses targeting the appropriate journal based on the novelty of the findings, writing each section of the paper including the abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion. It emphasizes defining the central message, preparing all data and references, following the target journal's style guidelines, and responding professionally to reviewer feedback. The overall goal is to clearly communicate new findings in a well-written paper and submit it to a journal where it has the best chance of being accepted for publication.
This document discusses sources of evidence for evidence-based practice. It outlines traditional sources such as textbooks and colleagues as well as evidence-based practice sources. Primary sources include original peer-reviewed papers that can be searched through databases like PubMed. Secondary sources provide synthesized research through systematic reviews and guidelines. Examples given are evidence-based journals, The Cochrane Library, and TRIP Database. A structured approach to database searching is also outlined, including developing a focused question and using keywords, subject headings, and Boolean operators to efficiently search literature.
Mobilizing informational resources for rare diseasesMaria Shkrob
Providing comprehensive disease-specific summaries remains a serious challenge as information is scattered across multiple resources. Elsevier is collaborating with a rare disease charity Findacure to create an informational portal for patients, researchers, and doctors to help finding new treatments, increase awareness, streamline information exchange and education. Using an integrative approach of automated and manual curation of literature, we constructed a knowledgebase containing an overview of the disease mechanisms, targets, drugs, key opinion leaders, and institutions. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, congenital hyperinsulinism will be discussed.
Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)Aboul Ella Hassanien
This seminar presented at faculty of Computers Monofiya university on Saturday 12 Dec. 2015. Seminar for researchers and graduate students at Egyptian universities to increase awareness of the importance of publication and scientific research and how to increase the researchers weight, its calculation, and calculation of magazines weight and how to calculate new weights that differ from the impact of the magazines and tips for students attic studies on how to increase citation of the published research papers and How to use open access publishing. In addition discuss the Issues in the field of open access including its advantages and disadvantages
This presentation was funded by CDC and PEPFAR through the SUCCEED project at Stellenbosch University. The presentation was delivered by Ms Lynn Hendricks from the Centre for Evidence Based Health Care in July 2017
This document provides information about evidence-based resources available through an e-library. It begins with an overview of key e-library databases like DynaMed, Nursing Reference Center, and STAT!Ref. It then discusses how to effectively search within databases using Boolean operators, truncation, and other search techniques. The document concludes by emphasizing the value of evidence-based resources for supporting high-quality patient care and decision-making.
This document provides an overview of navigating clinical information resources. It discusses:
1) The large volume of new MEDLINE articles published daily, including over 1500 new articles and 60 randomized trials.
2) How to access resources like PubMed and select the appropriate resource for different needs such as systematic reviews, guidelines, or time-limited searches.
3) Techniques for searching clinical questions quickly or through advanced searching, and setting up email alerts to stay current.
This document provides guidance on developing a search strategy for a systematic review. It discusses defining key concepts to search, identifying appropriate sources and search terms, using Boolean operators and limits to combine terms, and tips for conducting, recording, and reporting searches. The goal is to comprehensively and systematically identify all relevant evidence to answer the review question while minimizing bias. Developing an effective search strategy is a crucial step in the systematic review process.
This document discusses academic writing and referencing. It introduces plagiarism and how to avoid it using citations and references. Formatting guidelines are provided for different types of references, including books, book chapters, and journal articles. Students are instructed to use EndNote software to organize their references and generate in-text citations and bibliographies in Word documents. Activities are outlined for students to practice identifying reference elements, entering references into EndNote, and using EndNote's "Cite While You Write" function with a provided exercise.
The document provides an overview of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing significant research on a particular topic and placing one's own research question in the context of previous and current studies. The purpose is to evaluate research, recognize relevant sources, synthesize studies, and help answer the research question. It also discusses developing search strategies, evaluating sources, and writing the review. Key steps include formulating a question, identifying search terms, searching databases, appraising sources, and recording search methods.
Clinical Microbiology - searching for informationPaulaFunnell
This document provides an introduction to searching for medical information through the Queen Mary University library website and various databases and search tools. It outlines key learning objectives around using the library website, searching online for quality health information, and effectively using medical databases and EndNote. Specific databases and search engines introduced include Evidence Search, TRIP, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library. Search techniques like broadening terms, narrowing searches, phrase searching, and subject headings are also covered.
The academic impact of research: Current and the future citation trends in de...Nader Ale Ebrahim
Nader Ale Ebrahim presents on research impact and citation trends in developing countries. He discusses how familiarity with research tools can help increase citations and h-index. Developing countries currently lag behind in impact points and h-index compared to developed nations. However, using research tools to increase visibility can help close this gap over time by improving citation records. The future may see developing countries' current status become the future perspectives of other nations.
This document provides an overview of resources for searching for medical and health-related information. It introduces the Queen Mary University library website and search tools, as well as healthcare-specific search engines like Medline Plus and Evidence Search that search across high-quality web resources. It also describes medical databases like PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus that contain vast collections of published research articles and references. Strategies for broadening and narrowing database searches are also discussed.
This document provides guidance on writing a successful research proposal. It discusses including an introduction that establishes the problem being addressed and how the research will achieve its objectives. The methodology section should describe the research design, data collection instruments, participants, and analysis plan. Other important sections are aims and objectives, timeline, budget, and references. The proposal should convince reviewers that the research is feasible, addresses an important question, and is led by an appropriate investigator.
This document provides an overview of a workshop on using the Cochrane Library to train health librarians. The workshop covers introductions, an overview of Cochrane and systematic reviews, a demonstration of searching the Cochrane Library database, and small group work. Participants learn about finding and critically appraising systematic reviews to help inform evidence-based healthcare practices and decisions.
This document provides guidance on publishing in top-ranked journals (Q1). It discusses selecting the best target journal, writing strategies, manuscript sections, and the peer review process. The goal is to help researchers understand how to develop high-quality manuscripts that stand the best chance of being accepted in top journals.
The document provides guidance on how to conduct peer reviews of academic papers. It discusses what peer review is, how the process works, the roles and responsibilities of peer reviewers, factors to consider when deciding whether to accept a review invitation, questions reviewers should ask, criteria to focus on during reviews, best practices, and how to make decisions on manuscripts. The document aims to help new reviewers understand peer review and provide thoughtful, constructive feedback to improve papers.
Publishing Scientific Research and How to Write High-Impact Research Papersjjuhlrich
The document is a presentation about publishing scientific research and writing high-impact papers. It discusses John Uhlrich's background and role as an editor at Wiley-VCH. It provides tips for selecting journals, writing cover letters, responding to referee reports, and promoting published work. The presentation emphasizes communicating the importance and implications of research, comparing results to related work, and optimizing content for discovery online.
This is the PowerPoint of the short-term training programme conducted at MGR university by Dr.S.Vijayakumar of Crescent University. The talk focussed on the following aspects
Kinds of Research
How to write an Abstract
How to write Keywords
How to write an Effective Introduction
Reporting Methods
Writing the Results
Writing the Discussion section
How to Integrate Tables and Figures in your research paper.
Reference Management-Introduction to Mendeley
10-1. How to get your manuscript published? Elena Levtchenko (eng)KidneyOrgRu
This document provides guidance on how to get a manuscript published in a peer-reviewed journal. It discusses targeting the appropriate journal based on the novelty of the findings, writing each section of the paper including the abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion. It emphasizes defining the central message, preparing all data and references, following the target journal's style guidelines, and responding professionally to reviewer feedback. The overall goal is to clearly communicate new findings in a well-written paper and submit it to a journal where it has the best chance of being accepted for publication.
This document discusses sources of evidence for evidence-based practice. It outlines traditional sources such as textbooks and colleagues as well as evidence-based practice sources. Primary sources include original peer-reviewed papers that can be searched through databases like PubMed. Secondary sources provide synthesized research through systematic reviews and guidelines. Examples given are evidence-based journals, The Cochrane Library, and TRIP Database. A structured approach to database searching is also outlined, including developing a focused question and using keywords, subject headings, and Boolean operators to efficiently search literature.
Mobilizing informational resources for rare diseasesMaria Shkrob
Providing comprehensive disease-specific summaries remains a serious challenge as information is scattered across multiple resources. Elsevier is collaborating with a rare disease charity Findacure to create an informational portal for patients, researchers, and doctors to help finding new treatments, increase awareness, streamline information exchange and education. Using an integrative approach of automated and manual curation of literature, we constructed a knowledgebase containing an overview of the disease mechanisms, targets, drugs, key opinion leaders, and institutions. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, congenital hyperinsulinism will be discussed.
Journal and author impact measures Assessing your impact (h-index and beyond)Aboul Ella Hassanien
This seminar presented at faculty of Computers Monofiya university on Saturday 12 Dec. 2015. Seminar for researchers and graduate students at Egyptian universities to increase awareness of the importance of publication and scientific research and how to increase the researchers weight, its calculation, and calculation of magazines weight and how to calculate new weights that differ from the impact of the magazines and tips for students attic studies on how to increase citation of the published research papers and How to use open access publishing. In addition discuss the Issues in the field of open access including its advantages and disadvantages
This presentation was funded by CDC and PEPFAR through the SUCCEED project at Stellenbosch University. The presentation was delivered by Ms Lynn Hendricks from the Centre for Evidence Based Health Care in July 2017
This document provides information about evidence-based resources available through an e-library. It begins with an overview of key e-library databases like DynaMed, Nursing Reference Center, and STAT!Ref. It then discusses how to effectively search within databases using Boolean operators, truncation, and other search techniques. The document concludes by emphasizing the value of evidence-based resources for supporting high-quality patient care and decision-making.
Evidence Based Medicine involves integrating the best available research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values. It is a 5-step process: 1) framing a clinical question, 2) finding the best evidence, 3) critically appraising the evidence, 4) integrating the evidence into practice, and 5) evaluating the process. The hierarchy of evidence ranks randomized controlled trials highest, while expert opinion is lowest. Several sources can be used to find evidence, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, UptoDate, and clinical guidelines websites. Skill is required to perform efficient searches and appraise evidence critically.
(1) This document provides an overview of library resources and evidence-based practice for dental postgraduate trainees. It introduces UCL Library Services and key resources like HER, NICE Evidence, eResources, and UpToDate.
(2) Registration and authentication methods like OpenAthens are explained to access electronic resources. Search techniques like subject headings are recommended over free-text to improve results.
(3) Guidelines on finding and appraising evidence from journals and databases are provided. Contact details are listed for librarian support.
This document provides an overview of search tools and databases available through the Queen Mary University library for finding health-related information. It introduces healthcare specific search engines like MedlinePlus, Evidence Search, and TRIP that search across quality internet resources. It also outlines bibliographic databases like PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus that contain vast collections of published research references that can be filtered and searched using Boolean logic. Key learning points are highlighted on using filters to narrow search results and evaluating the quality and types of sources found through different tools.
This document provides library resources and search tips for nutrition research. It lists the objectives of finding appropriate library resources, distinguishing between types of scientific literature, and using keywords effectively to search PubMed. Useful research guides are listed for topics like nutrition, public health, and epidemiology. The research process is described as iterative, with developing topics as search is done. Scholarly vs. popular information sources are distinguished. Primary, secondary and tertiary literature are defined. Tips are provided for evaluating information sources and reading scientific literature critically. Methods of tracking search terms and using controlled vocabularies in databases are outlined.
Health Promotion Introduction To Literature SearchingJamie Halstead
The document discusses finding evidence from literature to support claims and arguments in assignments. It explains that evidence can come from books, journals, and the Internet. However, journals are preferable sources as they contain peer-reviewed research. When searching for evidence, it's important to evaluate sources for currency, authority, intent, relevance, and objectivity. The document then provides instructions for searching specific databases like CINAHL and NHS Evidence for literature on childhood obesity.
The document provides an introduction to the HSMC Library and its information resources. It outlines the session which includes an overview of the library, an introduction to literature searching, a demonstration of the HMIC database, and a question period. It then describes the library staff and services offered, including databases, collections, education and training, and current awareness resources. It provides examples of how to search for books and articles, and outlines developing an effective search strategy including using synonyms, truncation, spelling variations, and Boolean operators. Finally, it discusses limiting searches, selecting appropriate databases, downloading references, and contacting the library for additional help or guidance.
This document provides an overview of evidence-based nursing practice and how to effectively search for and evaluate evidence. It defines evidence-based practice as using the best available evidence from research to improve clinical practice. A 5-step process is outlined: formulating a question, searching literature, critically appraising evidence, applying evidence to practice, and re-evaluating. Guidance is given on formulating search strategies using PICO and searching various library databases and resources like Cochrane and CINAHL to find relevant evidence to answer clinical questions.
Locating Credible Databases and Research Paper Discussion.pdfbkbk37
1) The document discusses assisting a new nurse in locating credible evidence-based research on a patient's unfamiliar diagnosis.
2) It recommends communicating encouragement to research the diagnosis and collaborating to access online databases and other resources within the hospital.
3) Five relevant online sources are identified, such as medical journal databases and hospital policy databases, with an explanation of why each would provide good evidence for the chosen diagnosis within the clinical context.
Hpd library resources for clinical affiliatesKristin Kroger
This document provides an overview of library resources available to clinical affiliates of Nova Southeastern University's Health Professions Division. It summarizes key online databases, ebooks, journals, and point-of-care tools that are accessible through the HPD Library website or affiliated mobile apps. The resources cover topics like medicine, pharmacy, public health, and nursing, and include sources like ClinicalKey, UpToDate, AccessMedicine, and DynaMed. Instructions are provided for accessing the resources both on and off campus, as well as contacting library staff for assistance.
This document provides an overview of evidence-based practice (EBP) including its definition, importance, evolution, decision-making process, benefits, and misconceptions. It outlines a 5-step approach to EBP: formulating a question, finding evidence, appraising evidence, applying to practice while considering patient values, and evaluating effectiveness. Various resources and levels of evidence are also defined to help practitioners implement EBP and provide the highest quality, cost-effective care.
Nursing - Introduction To Literature SearchingJamie Halstead
This document provides an introduction to literature searching and finding evidence. It discusses what constitutes evidence and where it can be found, such as in books, online, and journals. Journals are highlighted as containing high-quality, peer-reviewed research. The document instructs on how to search specific databases like CINAHL and NHS Evidence to find literature on childhood obesity. It also provides tips for evaluating search results and references.
Literature searching for Health Promotion 2013JoWilson13
This document provides guidance on finding and evaluating evidence from literature for health promotion topics. It discusses searching journal databases and evaluating sources based on currency, authority, relevance and purpose (the CARP test). Key search techniques are covered, such as using keywords and limiting searches. Referencing sources is also explained. The goal is to find the best available evidence to support arguments and avoid plagiarism. Attendees work through hands-on exercises practicing literature searches and learn how to assess sources.
Nursing Informatics in Health Care Research Paper.pdfbkbk37
The document discusses a research paper assignment on the topic of nursing informatics in healthcare. Students are asked to write a 4-5 page evidence-based proposal arguing for the need of a nurse informaticist role in a healthcare organization. The proposal must include sections on nursing informatics and the nurse informaticist role, experiences of other organizations, impact on patient care, and opportunities and challenges. The goal is to justify this new role to organizational leaders by demonstrating return on investment in technology, quality improvement, and engaging nurses. Students are provided guidelines on research, formatting, and including citations and references in APA style.
The document provides an overview of how to find empirical evidence for clinical research projects, outlining key strategies and resources for developing effective search techniques and evaluating different levels of evidence, from systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines down to individual studies. It includes examples of searching databases such as MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library, as well as searching for grey literature and critically appraising the evidence found.
This document provides an overview of library skills and resources for a BSc in Veterinary Nursing. It discusses different types of information sources like books, web pages, newspapers, and journals. It also covers how to use library search tools like Summon to find information on topics related to a case study assignment on nursing care for a rabbit with fly strike. The document demonstrates searching for keywords, completing a quiz on resource types with a partner, and how to access personal eTextbooks and request physical books from the library. Contact information is provided for librarian assistance.
The document discusses evidence-based practice and describes a scenario where a nurse supervisor assists a newly oriented nurse in researching a diagnosis unfamiliar to them. It provides instructions for the reader to describe communication strategies to encourage research of the diagnosis, identify five relevant online sources of evidence, and explain why those sources were selected.
This document discusses evidence-based practice (EBP) and describes a scenario where a nurse supervisor assists a newly trained nurse in researching a patient's unfamiliar diagnosis. It recommends communication strategies for mentoring nurses, such as empathetic listening and feedback. It also provides criteria (currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, purpose) for evaluating credible online sources. Five sources are identified for researching postoperative pain management, including CINAHL, PubMed, and journals. The sources provide validated information from vetted medical articles.
This slideshare is from a lecture given to DENT4104 students beginning UWA's Doctor of Medical Dentistry. It introduces some basis OneSearch Library catalogue functions and introduces the notion of Evidence Based Practice.
1. Practicing Up To
Date Medicine
An overview of things that can
make it easier
Andrew Milne, NHS Librarian
2. Today we’ll cover:
• What the Library can offer you
• What NHS OpenAthens offers you
• How to use those services as part of the
Evidence Based Medicine cycle
• Sources of additional support
3. Working at Imperial College
Healthcare NHS Trust means
access to an Imperial College
network of libraries.
That’s the book stock of six
libraries instead of just one
hospital library.
4.
5. Opening hours vary by site
Hammersmith
9am – 9pm Monday to Friday
Plus out of hours access to PCs
until midnight and on weekends
6. Opening hours vary by site
Charing Cross
9am – 9pm Monday to Friday
Plus 10am – 5pm Saturdays
7. Opening hours vary by site
St. Mary’s
9am – 9pm Monday to Friday
1:30pm – 5pm Saturday
Plus access to the upper gallery
every day from 7am til midnight
8. Joining is simple
1. Show Commonwealth
Building security your hospital
ID to get an Imperial College
ID card.
2. Fill in a registration form at
the library.
9. Now that you’ve
joined you get:
books e-books
journals e-journals
printing and copying quiet study space
PC access
group study rooms
databases free interlibrary loans
help and training from library staff
10. We offer thousands of books covering
general medicine, medical specialisms,
nursing, allied health, and research skills.
12. We arrange our books
based on NLM – National
Library of Medicine
classification.
This means books
are grouped by
subject at general
and specific levels.
13. We arrange our books
based on NLM – National
Library of Medicine
classification.
This means books
are grouped by
subject at general
and specific levels.
14. WJ = general subject
39 = specific subject
OXF = title or first author
15. The library website has a
dedicated section for NHS users.
This offers information and links
to a variety of resources and
services.
16. You can also search the
catalogue for books and
journals or specific journal
articles directly from library
web pages.
17.
18. For the most up to date current awareness
and primary sources of evidence, you
should be looking at journal articles.
19. We keep some current issues of journals in
the library, with older issues available on
request.
Many are now provided electronically
instead and can be viewed at one of our
PCs.
20. As well as journal articles, our PCs give you
access to:
Internet
Microsoft Office
Additional resources
from Imperial College
London – for example
UpToDate
21. You can send work to the
B&W or colour printer from
our PCs and release it from
a printer with your Imperial
College card if it has credit.
Scanning is free.
23. OpenAthens gives you
access to a wide range of
resources – from any
device, anywhere.
24. You can self-register for
OpenAthens online – if
necessary, we’ll check and
approve your account.
25. NICE Evidence search is quick
and handy ‘Google’ for health
queries.
Use it to search for clinical knowledge
summaries, guidelines, care
pathways, and more.
26. The A-Z list of journals gives you access to
the archives of a variety of journals – at the
library, the hospital, at home, and on the go.
Great when you
have a specific
journal or article in
mind.
27. The Cochrane Library
A library of meta-analyses and systematic
reviews available through NICE Evidence
website.
Systematic
reviews = the
gold standard
28. HDAS is the jewel in NICE
Evidence’s crown.
Healthcare Databases Advanced Search
gives you 8 databases to search for
articles specific to your clinical or research
query.
29. The Evidence
Based Medicine
Cycle
Uncertainty
translated into
answerable
question
Systematic
retrieval of high
quality relevant
evidence
Critical appraisal
Evaluation and
Applicable results
applied to
practice
audit
30. Step 1 – Asking the right question
• Be specific and provide as much detail as
possible
• Anticipate how you’ll use the answer
• Consider techniques like PICO
32. • Is acupuncture effective?
VS
• Is acupuncture an effective treatment in
smoking cessation?
33. Step 2 – Gathering evidence
• Use a variety of databases
• Use consistent searches
• Break your question down into ‘search
chunks’
• Identify a variety of keywords and synonyms
for each chunk
35. Use OR to combine keyword searches for
similar and synonymous terms – i.e. to
create chunks or groups of keywords.
Oxygen
therapy
Oxygen
delivery
Oxygen
inhalation
therapy
36. Use OR to combine keyword searches for
similar and synonymous terms – i.e. to
create chunks or groups of keywords.
Lower
respiratory
tract infection
Whooping
cough
Pertussis
37. Use OR to combine keyword searches for
similar and synonymous terms – i.e. to
create chunks or groups of keywords.
Child Infant Young
38. Use AND to combine the groups of
keywords – bringing back only results
relevant to every group.
Oxygen
therapy etc.
Lower
respiratory tract
infections etc.
Child etc.
47. Step 3 – Critical Appraisal
“the process of carefully and systematically
examining research to judge its
trustworthiness, and its value and relevance
in a particular context”
(Critical Appraisal
Support Programme)
www.casp-uk.net
48. Critical Appraisal…
…stops you being a passive reader;
…helps you to filter out low quality evidence;
…should lead to stronger research output as
you become aware of what makes evidence
robust.
49. Step 3 – Critical Appraisal
• Use checklists by organisations like CASP
• Maintain a critical eye
• Does the study ask a clear question?
• Is the study well-designed for what it tries to
investigate?
• Is it statistically significant?
• Is it clinically and locally significant?
50. Research design and methodology
• Is the study type appropriate?
• Is it ethical?
• Was blinding used?
• Were participants randomised?
• Was intention to treat analysis used?
• How many participants were lost to follow-up?
• Was collection of results consistent?
51. Results
• How large was the treatment effect?
• Is the primary outcome clearly specified?
• What results were found for each
outcome?
• How precise is the estimate of the
treatment effect? (confidence intervals;
power calculations)
52. Favours Treatment
Value of no effect
Favours Control
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
95% confidence interval
53. Stats cheat sheet
• Look for p-values of 0.05 or less
• Power calculations in the range 80-95%
• Shorter confidence intervals mean closer
pinpointing of the true result
• Confidence intervals that cross 0 mean an
inconclusive result
• Number needed to treat (NNT) – lower is better,
but avoid 0 or negative!
• Relative Risk: 1 means no difference in risk
between groups; either side favours one or the
other
54. Implications of research
• Can it be applied locally?
• Costs and harm versus benefits?
• Statistical significance does not mean
clinical significance
• Is further research needed?
• Any conflicts of interest?
• Any weasel words? (“approaching
statistical significance”)
56. • Join or set up a journal club
• Follow journal clubs online (e.g. #TwitJC)
• Attend a critical appraisal workshop
• Read new literature
• Save searches in HDAS and create alerts for
when new literature is published
57.
58. Steps 4 & 5
• Applying the relevant results to your practice is
up to you and your colleagues
• Evaluation and audit makes continued use of
your information skills and critical skills
• Remain reflective and don’t rely on received
wisdom or assume you’ve perfected something
• Return to step 1
59. The Evidence
Based Medicine
Cycle
Uncertainty
translated into
answerable
question
Systematic
retrieval of high
quality relevant
evidence
Critical appraisal
Evaluation and
Applicable results
applied to
practice
audit
60. In summary
• The library is here for you to use – use it
• OpenAthens is there for you to use – use it
• Apply systematic search techniques to
answer focused questions
• Set up alerts for those searches
• Critically appraise your results before
applying to practice
• Seek help when you need it
61. Library
Induction
Searching
Databases
Current
Awareness
Critical
Appraisal
The four modules of the Library’s
information skills training programme
62. Library
Induction
Searching
Databases
Current
Awareness
Critical
Appraisal
The four modules of the Library’s
information skills training programme
You might be able to skip steps if you feel
comfortable. The goal is to help you complete the
programme with the foundations necessary to make
effective use of resources with stronger information
literacy.
63. Library InductionSearching Databases
Critical Appraisal Text here
Social
Media?
Reference
Management?
Current
Awareness
New
Tech?
But eventually…
• Additional modules
• New content
• A growing set of key
skills for you to pick
and mix
• Consistent delivery
• Fresh training
responding to your
needs and wants