The document compares the Standohyd basecoat system to competitors' systems. It analyzes properties like number of toners, VOC levels, shelf life, application methods, opacity, consumption and overall performance. Testing was conducted by Standox technicians and customers in 6 countries. Standohyd required the fewest coats, had the shortest application time, and highest overall rating compared to competitors like Glasurit, Sikkens, Nexa, PPG and DuPont.

1. STANDOHYD BASECOAT
S t a n d o h y d C o m p e t it io n
C o m p a r is o n
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

2. Competition Comparison
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

3. Competition Comparison
Th e r e s u l t s p r e s e n t e d a r e b a s e d o n
f a c t u a l d a t a t a k e n f r o m T e c h n ic a l D a t a
S h e e t s , a n d t h e p r a c t ic a l f in d in g s o f
S t a n d o x T e c h n ic ia n s a n d c u s t o m e r s in
e v a l u a t io n o f t h e s e p r o d u c t s in s ix
d if f e r e n t c o u n t r ie s .
S p a in , G e r m a n y , N e t h e r l a n d s , G e r m a n y , U K
a n d S t a n d o x In t e r n a t io n a l T r a in in g .
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

4. Competitors - System Overview
Standox Glasurit Sikkens Nexa PPG RM DuPont
Name Standohyd Series 90 Autowave Aquabase Envirobase Onyx HD Cromax
No of Toners 64 58 59 63 66 53 67
Binder Urethane Disp Urethane Resin WB Acryl Resin Microgel Urethane Resin Urethane Resin Urethane Acrylate
110 - 100 -
VOC g/l 250 - 410 420 130 ? 480 420 420
Shelf Life 24 months - 18 months No limit 36 months 24 months
Mixed life 6 months 6 months 24 - 36 h 3 months - 7 days 24 months
100-10/
Mix ratio 100 - 10% 2:1 20 10:1:1 100:30 100:60 RFU
No of Coats 0.5 + 1 + 0.25 2 + 0.5 2 + 1 to 2 1 + 0.5 + 0.25 2 to 4 1 to 3 + 0.5 2 + 0.25
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

5. Application – Number of Spray Passes
STANDOX
0 .5 1 .0 0 .2 5
NEXA
1 .0 0 .5 0 .2 5
DuPont
1 .0 1 .0 0 .2 5
GLASURIT
1 .0 1 .0 0 .5
SIKKENS
1 .0 1 .0 0 .5 0 .5
PPG-RM
1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 0 .5
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

6. Number of Spray Passes
“Work & Wait” Time ( Front end, no dryers. From TDS)
STANDOX
0 .5 1 .0 0 .2 5 1 1 m in
NEXA
1 .0 0 .5 0 .2 5 1 9 m in
DuPont
1 .0 1 .0 0 .2 5 0 m in
GLASURIT
1 .0 1 .0 0 .5 2 2 m in
SIKKENS
1 .0 1 .0 0 .5 0 .5 2 4 m in
PPG-RM
1 .0 1 .0 1 .0 2 6 V in
m
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

7. Competitive System Characteristics
Ac t iv it y c o m p a r e d
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

8. Competitive System Characteristics
E a s e o f a p p l ic a t io n (f u l l p a n e l ) Fu l l p a n e l
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

9. Competitive System Characteristics
O v e r s p r a y a b s o r p t io n Fu l l p a n e l
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

10. Competitive System Characteristics
S a n d -a b il it y / d e -n ib Fu l l p a n e l
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

11. Competitive System Characteristics
M o t t l in g - c l o u d in g Fu l l p a n e l
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

12. Competitive System Characteristics
Al u m in iu m a p p e a r a n c e Fu l l p a n e l
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

13. Competitive System Characteristics
O p a c it y c o v e r in g p o w e r Fu l l p a n e l
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

14. Competitive System Characteristics
M a t e r ia l c o n s u m p t io n (F o r d M o n d e o B o n n e t a n d w in g )G r e e n F u a r l p
Pe l l an el
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
460g
5
486g
4 5 1 0g
5 2 4g
3 635 g
676g
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

15. Competitive System Characteristics
T o t a l r a t in g f o r a l l c o m p a r e d p r o p e r t ie s Fu l l p a n e l
Standohyd D u P o n t G l a s u r it PPG Nex a S ik k e n s
H ig h 1 0 Be s t Wo r s t
9
8
7
6
5
54 53
4
45
3 40
2
37 35
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

16. Competitive System Characteristics
Part II
Fade out area
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

17. Competitive System Characteristics
E a s e o f a p p l ic a t io n f a d e o u t (g o l d m e t a l l ic ) Fa d e o u t
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

18. Competitive System Characteristics
C l o u d in e s s o f f a d e o u t a r e a Fa d e o u t
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

19. Competitive System Characteristics
S il v e r h a l o / b a n d Fa d e o u t
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

20. Competitive System Characteristics
Al u m in iu m s t r u c t u r e Fa d e o u t
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

21. Competitive System Characteristics
Fl o p t o n e o f t h e b l e n d a r e a Fa d e o u t
Standohyd G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s D u Po n t
H ig h 1 0
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

22. Competitive System Characteristics
T o t a l r a t in g f o r a l l c o m p a r e d p r o p e r t ie s Fa d e o u t
Standohyd Nex a D u P o n t G l a s u r it P P G S ik k e n s
H ig h 1 0 Be s t Wo r s t
9
8
7
6
5
40 40
4
35 35
3 30
2 27
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

23. Competitive System Characteristics
T o t a l r a t in g f o r a l l c o m p a r e d p r o p e r t ie s f u l l
pan el an d fad e o ut
Standohyd D u Po n t G l a s u r it Nex a PPG S ik k e n s
H ig h 1 0 Be s t Wo r s t
9
8
7
6
5 94
88 80
4 77 70
62
3
2
Lo w 1
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

24. Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths
B r ig h t c l e a n s il v e r c o l o u r t o n e s
9 0 L inAp p l ic a t io n is n e a r f o o l -p r o o f
e
S il v e r c o l o u r s s a n d -a b l e w e t o r d r y
N o t d if f ic u l t t o b l e n d o n s m a l l r e p a ir s
Weaknesses
V e r y p o o r o v e r s p r a y a b s o r p t io n
S il v e r c o l o u r s s e t t l e in t h e c a n
Al l n o n -S il v e r c o l o u r s a r e p o o r p e r f o r m in g
O p a c it y n o t c o n s is t e n t
S e n s it iv e t o s p r a y g u n c h o ic e (W S B t o o s m a l l )
H ig h m a t e r ia l c o n s u m p t io n
M ix in g a c c u r a c y w h e n u s in g c o n c e n t r a t e d t o n e
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

25. Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths
Wa v e B a s e c o a t c a n b e s a n d e d
21
B r ig h t S il v e r s h a v e a g o o d -f in e e f f e c t
Us e o f c o a g u l a n t
Weaknesses
M u l t ip l e c o a t s r e q u ir e d
H ig h m a t e r ia l c o n s u m p t io n
D r y c o n t r o l c o a t c a n s h if t t h e f in a l c o l o u r t o n e
P o o r o p a c it y f o r m a n y c o l o u r s
C l o u d in g /m o t t l in g p o s s ib l e w it h l ig h t c o l o u r s
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

26. Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths
Aq u a b a s e
O p a c it y g o o d
B l e n d in g n o t d if f ic u l t
G o o d m e t a l l ic a p p e a r a n c e
Weaknesses
B a s e c o a t r e m a in s v e r y s t ic k y c a n n o t t a k -w ip e
N o c h a n c e t o d e -n ib
M ix in g v e r y c o m p l ic a t e d
S h o r t m ix e d p o t l if e
O p a c it y n o t a s g o o d a s S t a n d o x
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

27. Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths
Go o d t o s p r a y
E n v irF absats in t e r c o a t f l a s h o f f u n t il m u l t ip l e c o a t s u s e
o e
G o o d t o d r y d e -n ib
G o o d o v e r s p r a y a b s o r p t io n
Weaknesses
V e r y p o o r o p a c it y o n s o m e c o l o u r s (r e d s )
L a r g e c o l o u r c h a n g e w e t t o d r y (r e d s a r e p in k t h
M e t a l l ic c o l o u r s c a n a p p e a r t o s p a r k l e /g l it t e r
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

28. Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths
C o l o u r d o c u m e n t a t io n
Weaknesses
L o n g p r o c e s s t im e s
M u l t ip l e c o a t s
D if f ic u l t f o r b l e n d -in /f a d e o u t
C o l o u r a c c u r a c y t o t h e v e h ic l e
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

29. Strengths and Weaknesses
Cr o m ax
Strengths
C o l o u r d o c u m e n t a t io n
B a s e c o a t c a n b e m a s k e d f o r t w o -t o n e c o l o u r s
R e a d y t o u s e (n o -m ix in g )
O n e v is it a p p l ic a t io n
Weaknesses
M a t e r ia l c o n s u m p t io n
E n d f l a s h o f f c a n b e l o n g w it h o u t b l o w -d r y e r s
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards

30. Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths
Standohyd E a s y t o a p p l y
V e r y g o o d o p a c it y
O n e v is it a p p l ic a t io n
C a n b e d e -n ib b e d a n d t a k w ip e d
Go o d t o f a d e o u t
L o w m a t e r ia l c o n s u m p t io n
Weaknesses
S o m e S il v e r c o l o u r s c a n a p p e a r g l it t e r y
D ir t y c o l o u r t o n e s
B it s in t h e f il t e r c a n b e s e e n a f t e r s t r a in in g
04/03/12 Technical Training- Setting new Standards