The document discusses whether it is right for the international community to impose on another nation's sovereignty to protect human rights. It argues that international intervention is only justified if human rights violations are certain and not driven by any nation's personal agenda. However, the document provides examples where interventions like in Iraq and sanctions against Cuba and Russia backfired due to the bias of influential countries. It concludes that human rights abuses can be stopped through international action on a nation's sovereignty, but only if the action is taken carefully with people's well-being as the priority and without biased agendas.