SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Effects of Stiffness Changes on Ankle Kinematics and Muscle Activity
Nicholas Bira, Julieth Ochoa, Cameron Arnett, Prof. Neville Hogan
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Amgen Scholars Program, Hogan Lab
ABSTRACT
The human ankle is an essential aspect of human locomotion, and understanding the subtle nuances of
how the ankle behaves under different stressors is of interest to researchers studying locomotion. Previous
studies involving both single and multiple degrees of freedom have analyzed the mobility and motility of the
ankle in healthy individuals. This study aims to examine how different ankle stiffnesses affect gait. Individuals
with low mobility in the ankle (high stiffness) stride differently than people with high mobility, or poor
muscular control (low stiffness). We applied varying stiffnesses to healthy individuals during the walking cycle
to examine their responses and muscle activity. The results of these measurements will further define ankle
behavior and how various factors affect locomotion.
METHODS
Processing Raw Data Workflow
Anklebot
Butterworth
Filter
Segmentation
based on
knee angle
Averaging
and Stan.
Deviations
Zero data
using initial
values
EMG
Rectification
Running
Average
window
(200ms)
Segmentation
based on heel
strikes
Averaging
and Stan.
Devs.
Swing Phase
Swing Phase
Swing Phase
Stance Phase
Stance Phase
Stance Phase
Typical Knee Angle Stride Behavior Typical D/P Stride BehaviorTypical I/E Stride Behavior
• ~22 minutes of walking occurred at various stiffnesses: 1 min of
starting 0, 5 min at +40, 5 min at 0, 1 min at -5, 5 min at -10,
and another 5 min at 0.
• Data collected included knee angle, ankle inversion/eversion,
ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, and EMG signals for the
Tibialis Anterior, Soleus, Gastrocnemius, and Peroneus Longus
(200Hz for Anklebot, 1kHz for EMGs).
• 2 Degrees of Freedom in the ankle examined: Inversion/Eversion
(I/E), and Dorsiflexion/Plantarflexion (D/P). Knee angles and lower
leg muscle EMGs were also examined.
• Mobile Anklebot setup for Overground Trials (on a 200m track)
Eversion Inversion Plantarflexion
Dorsiflexion
Anklebot actuators, with knee brace.
Kinematic data was collected from the
two actuators and potentiometer.
Results - Kinematics
• Dependent variable: maximum knee
flexion during swing phase
• +40 produced significantly different results
than neutral or -10; reduced for OG and
increased for TM
• Overall greater flexion in OG than TM
• Dependent variable: Ankle
inversion/eversion maximum knee flexion
during swing phase
• No significant difference between neutral
stiffnesses in OG or TM
• During -10 stiffness, I/E was increased in
both TM and OG
• During +40, I/E was decreased in both TM
and OG
• Dependent variable: Stride Duration
• In both OG and TM walking, +40 elicited
significantly greater stride duration
• In OG, stride duration decreased after
+40 and remained constant regardless
• In TM, stride duration decreased in each
epoch before jumping back up in 0_end
• Dependent variable: Ankle dorsi-/plantar-
flexion at maximum knee flexion during
swing phase
• No significant difference between +40 and
following 0 in OG or TM
• During -10, DP was significantly greater in
OG and lesser in TM
• This trend continued for OG but returned
to normal for TM
• Two-factor ANOVAs over 800
strides
• Knee, DP, and IE angle were
extracted from the moment of
maximum knee flexion during
swing phase
• Stride duration is the elapsed
time between heel strikes
• Independent variables:
• Walking Environment
(TM, OG)
• Stiffness Value (+40,
0_middle, -10, 0_end)
• 0.05 significance level was set
for all statistical tests
• A significant interaction was
observed between walking
environment and stiffness
(p<0.05)
• Post hoc analyses using Tukey’s
HSD test were conducted to
examine marginal means for
stiffness condition
• Overall statistically greater
values for OG when compared
to TM for knee and D/P, and
lesser for I/E and stride
duration.
• -10 stiffness had greatest effect
on all studied aspects.
Inversion
Eversion
Dorsiflexion
Plantarflexion
Treadmill and Overground Mean Stride Behaviors per Epoch
TM
OG
Results – Overground EMGs
• Two-factor ANOVAs were conducted
on 420 strides
• Examining the effect of imposed
ankle stiffness on maximum EMG
activation levels during 4 different
segments of the gait cycle in OG
walking: 0-10% (initial contact &
loading response), 40-60% (terminal
stance and pre-swing), 60-80% (initial
and mid swing), and 80-100% (mid
and terminal swing)
• A 0.05 significance level was set for
all statistical tests.
• Independent variables: Stiffness
Value (0_initial, +40, 0_middle, -10,
0_end) and Muscle Type (TA, PL,
SOL, GAS)
• Dependent variable: Maximum EMG
Activation Levels
• Soleus alone displayed significant differences during
the 0-10% epoch
• Increased between stiffness changes, and only for the -
10 and following 0 stiffness
• SOL and GAS statistically increased across all epochs,
except GAS decreased following the -10 epoch
• TA activation levels decreased significantly for all stiff
• No effects in PL
• PL and SOL increased for each of the progressive
epochs (especially SOL)
• TA displayed decreased magnitude as trial proceeded
• No significant effects in GAS
• SOL displayed significant increases for each of the
progressive epochs
• No significant effects in PL, TA, or GAS
TA
SOLSOL
SOL
GAS
SOL
PL
All four muscles examined play
important roles in normal walking
and stabilization of the ankle.
Conclusions/Future Work
• Anklebot restricts rotation about the I/E plane with applied stiffnesses, but not in the D/P plane.
• While variations in the I/E plane are apparent for the different stiffnesses, there are also statistically significant differences in D/P
angle as well.
• This suggests coupling between I/E and D/P
• The EMG data from overground suggests that the Soleus is profoundly affected by different stiffnesses, in particular, that proceeding from a
positive stiffness to a negative one generates increased muscle activity that lasts beyond the cause
• The TA seems to be noticeably affected by the negative 10 stiffness during the swing phase of the stride
• The TA is involved in lifting the toes, and this behavior may be the result of the ankle attempting to stabilize and compensate for the
negative stiffness.
• Treadmill and Overground demonstrate markedly different magnitudes in angle magnitude
• This indicates that treadmill and overground may be different in how they induce walking, unlike some previous studies that indicate
the two produce equivalent results
• On treadmill, steps seem to be less pronounced as a possible result of the instability felt while walking
• Overground may encourage longer strides and more pronounced movements as a result of better posture and forward facing
movement
• Distinct effort will be taken to collect further trials from multiple subjects using the processing methods in this presentation
• Muscle EMGs will be calibrated to maximum voluntary contraction from standardized procedures in future trials
• A more thorough examination of the differences between TM and OG, eliminating differences such as walking speed, stride length, etc.

More Related Content

What's hot

Ground Reaction Force & Stress Injuries
Ground Reaction Force & Stress InjuriesGround Reaction Force & Stress Injuries
Ground Reaction Force & Stress InjuriesAlpesh Jadhav
 
P pt final sagittal plane analysis of gait
P pt  final   sagittal plane analysis of gaitP pt  final   sagittal plane analysis of gait
P pt final sagittal plane analysis of gaitDrTabassumAzmi
 
Jennings Lm. Wear Of Knee Replacements Influence Of Kinematics And Design
Jennings Lm. Wear Of Knee Replacements Influence Of Kinematics And DesignJennings Lm. Wear Of Knee Replacements Influence Of Kinematics And Design
Jennings Lm. Wear Of Knee Replacements Influence Of Kinematics And DesignStruijs
 
Hamelynck Kj. Stability Of The Knee, A Dynamic Concept
Hamelynck Kj. Stability Of The Knee, A Dynamic ConceptHamelynck Kj. Stability Of The Knee, A Dynamic Concept
Hamelynck Kj. Stability Of The Knee, A Dynamic ConceptStruijs
 
Spatial and temporal variables of gait
Spatial and temporal variables of gaitSpatial and temporal variables of gait
Spatial and temporal variables of gaitDr. Nithin Nair (PT)
 
Crimson Publishers-Assessment of the Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Ankl...
Crimson Publishers-Assessment of the Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Ankl...Crimson Publishers-Assessment of the Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Ankl...
Crimson Publishers-Assessment of the Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Ankl...Crimsonpublishers-Sportsmedicine
 
Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athlete...
Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athlete...Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athlete...
Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athlete...Ciro Winckler
 
Kinematic gait analysis 1
Kinematic gait analysis 1Kinematic gait analysis 1
Kinematic gait analysis 1rraja durai
 
Gait_ Introduction, Analysis & Re-education Principles
Gait_ Introduction, Analysis & Re-education PrinciplesGait_ Introduction, Analysis & Re-education Principles
Gait_ Introduction, Analysis & Re-education PrinciplesVivek Ramanandi
 
Cga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we do
Cga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we doCga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we do
Cga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we doRichard Baker
 
Basics of biomechanics
Basics of biomechanicsBasics of biomechanics
Basics of biomechanicsEimaan Ktk
 

What's hot (20)

Ground Reaction Force & Stress Injuries
Ground Reaction Force & Stress InjuriesGround Reaction Force & Stress Injuries
Ground Reaction Force & Stress Injuries
 
Gait analysis
Gait analysisGait analysis
Gait analysis
 
Aagaard, p. 1996
Aagaard, p. 1996Aagaard, p. 1996
Aagaard, p. 1996
 
I:\Kinemetics Of Gait2 Dh 2
I:\Kinemetics Of Gait2 Dh 2I:\Kinemetics Of Gait2 Dh 2
I:\Kinemetics Of Gait2 Dh 2
 
P pt final sagittal plane analysis of gait
P pt  final   sagittal plane analysis of gaitP pt  final   sagittal plane analysis of gait
P pt final sagittal plane analysis of gait
 
SPIN_15
SPIN_15SPIN_15
SPIN_15
 
Jennings Lm. Wear Of Knee Replacements Influence Of Kinematics And Design
Jennings Lm. Wear Of Knee Replacements Influence Of Kinematics And DesignJennings Lm. Wear Of Knee Replacements Influence Of Kinematics And Design
Jennings Lm. Wear Of Knee Replacements Influence Of Kinematics And Design
 
La neta de la goniometria
La neta de la goniometriaLa neta de la goniometria
La neta de la goniometria
 
06 ppt gait seminar
06 ppt gait seminar06 ppt gait seminar
06 ppt gait seminar
 
Hamelynck Kj. Stability Of The Knee, A Dynamic Concept
Hamelynck Kj. Stability Of The Knee, A Dynamic ConceptHamelynck Kj. Stability Of The Knee, A Dynamic Concept
Hamelynck Kj. Stability Of The Knee, A Dynamic Concept
 
Spatial and temporal variables of gait
Spatial and temporal variables of gaitSpatial and temporal variables of gait
Spatial and temporal variables of gait
 
Crimson Publishers-Assessment of the Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Ankl...
Crimson Publishers-Assessment of the Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Ankl...Crimson Publishers-Assessment of the Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Ankl...
Crimson Publishers-Assessment of the Muscle Strength and Range of Motion Ankl...
 
GAIT
GAITGAIT
GAIT
 
Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athlete...
Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athlete...Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athlete...
Discus throwing performances and medical classification of wheelchair athlete...
 
Kinematic gait analysis 1
Kinematic gait analysis 1Kinematic gait analysis 1
Kinematic gait analysis 1
 
Gait analysis
Gait analysisGait analysis
Gait analysis
 
Gait_ Introduction, Analysis & Re-education Principles
Gait_ Introduction, Analysis & Re-education PrinciplesGait_ Introduction, Analysis & Re-education Principles
Gait_ Introduction, Analysis & Re-education Principles
 
WISENC-15
WISENC-15WISENC-15
WISENC-15
 
Cga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we do
Cga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we doCga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we do
Cga ifa 2015 7 why we walk the way we do
 
Basics of biomechanics
Basics of biomechanicsBasics of biomechanics
Basics of biomechanics
 

Viewers also liked

The Experiences of Beginning Principals of Independent Schools
The Experiences of Beginning Principals of Independent SchoolsThe Experiences of Beginning Principals of Independent Schools
The Experiences of Beginning Principals of Independent SchoolsSteve Bagi
 
2015_833_Mannan_ppt
2015_833_Mannan_ppt2015_833_Mannan_ppt
2015_833_Mannan_pptZiaul Mannan
 
Внутренняя память компьютера
Внутренняя память компьютераВнутренняя память компьютера
Внутренняя память компьютераVera2160
 
Sample ppt (jigar patel m13cl08 ).ppx
Sample ppt  (jigar patel m13cl08 ).ppxSample ppt  (jigar patel m13cl08 ).ppx
Sample ppt (jigar patel m13cl08 ).ppxjigarpatidar21
 
Hermeticity
HermeticityHermeticity
HermeticityEWI
 
IとTの間のお仕事の話
IとTの間のお仕事の話IとTの間のお仕事の話
IとTの間のお仕事の話Tsutomu Sakaguchi
 
DEL-nr5_Lindenholt_LR.PDF
DEL-nr5_Lindenholt_LR.PDFDEL-nr5_Lindenholt_LR.PDF
DEL-nr5_Lindenholt_LR.PDFAstrid de Groot
 
Challenges in Heavy Manufacturing Part III: Fatigue Performance
Challenges in Heavy Manufacturing Part III: Fatigue PerformanceChallenges in Heavy Manufacturing Part III: Fatigue Performance
Challenges in Heavy Manufacturing Part III: Fatigue PerformanceEWI
 
Septi xii ips2
Septi xii ips2Septi xii ips2
Septi xii ips2septierna
 

Viewers also liked (20)

The Experiences of Beginning Principals of Independent Schools
The Experiences of Beginning Principals of Independent SchoolsThe Experiences of Beginning Principals of Independent Schools
The Experiences of Beginning Principals of Independent Schools
 
Presentation 1 of 4
Presentation 1 of 4Presentation 1 of 4
Presentation 1 of 4
 
2015_833_Mannan_ppt
2015_833_Mannan_ppt2015_833_Mannan_ppt
2015_833_Mannan_ppt
 
CV Lopez Patricia 2015 UAE
CV Lopez Patricia 2015 UAECV Lopez Patricia 2015 UAE
CV Lopez Patricia 2015 UAE
 
Внутренняя память компьютера
Внутренняя память компьютераВнутренняя память компьютера
Внутренняя память компьютера
 
Sample ppt (jigar patel m13cl08 ).ppx
Sample ppt  (jigar patel m13cl08 ).ppxSample ppt  (jigar patel m13cl08 ).ppx
Sample ppt (jigar patel m13cl08 ).ppx
 
Tire pressure
Tire pressureTire pressure
Tire pressure
 
Cars with wifi
Cars with wifiCars with wifi
Cars with wifi
 
Sanuja CV
Sanuja CVSanuja CV
Sanuja CV
 
Mohammed CV 2015
Mohammed CV 2015Mohammed CV 2015
Mohammed CV 2015
 
Cinema2013
Cinema2013Cinema2013
Cinema2013
 
Realidad virtual
Realidad virtualRealidad virtual
Realidad virtual
 
Hermeticity
HermeticityHermeticity
Hermeticity
 
IとTの間のお仕事の話
IとTの間のお仕事の話IとTの間のお仕事の話
IとTの間のお仕事の話
 
DEL-nr5_Lindenholt_LR.PDF
DEL-nr5_Lindenholt_LR.PDFDEL-nr5_Lindenholt_LR.PDF
DEL-nr5_Lindenholt_LR.PDF
 
10 Weeks of Free
10 Weeks of Free10 Weeks of Free
10 Weeks of Free
 
Halla Tomasdottir TED Speaker Presentation of women on boards nwci
Halla Tomasdottir TED Speaker Presentation of  women on boards nwciHalla Tomasdottir TED Speaker Presentation of  women on boards nwci
Halla Tomasdottir TED Speaker Presentation of women on boards nwci
 
Trabajo de investigación
Trabajo de investigaciónTrabajo de investigación
Trabajo de investigación
 
Challenges in Heavy Manufacturing Part III: Fatigue Performance
Challenges in Heavy Manufacturing Part III: Fatigue PerformanceChallenges in Heavy Manufacturing Part III: Fatigue Performance
Challenges in Heavy Manufacturing Part III: Fatigue Performance
 
Septi xii ips2
Septi xii ips2Septi xii ips2
Septi xii ips2
 

Similar to Poster Presentation.pptx

The Effects of Heel Lift Height on Back Squat Performance
The Effects of Heel Lift Height on Back Squat PerformanceThe Effects of Heel Lift Height on Back Squat Performance
The Effects of Heel Lift Height on Back Squat PerformanceChristopher Johnston
 
Biomechanics of Gait, Posture and ADL
Biomechanics of Gait, Posture and ADLBiomechanics of Gait, Posture and ADL
Biomechanics of Gait, Posture and ADLSoniya Lohana
 
Gait analysis Presentation_3.pptx
Gait analysis Presentation_3.pptxGait analysis Presentation_3.pptx
Gait analysis Presentation_3.pptxAjitRampure
 
RealReportforSGP_NEW
RealReportforSGP_NEWRealReportforSGP_NEW
RealReportforSGP_NEWAdam Thorne
 
biomechanics of stair climbing
biomechanics of stair climbingbiomechanics of stair climbing
biomechanics of stair climbingHetvi Shukla
 
Streaching - Dra. Deborah Gaebler
Streaching - Dra. Deborah GaeblerStreaching - Dra. Deborah Gaebler
Streaching - Dra. Deborah GaeblerTeletón Paraguay
 
High flexion TKR overview
High flexion TKR overviewHigh flexion TKR overview
High flexion TKR overviewHiren Divecha
 
Postgraduate orthopaedics march 2015 biomechanics
Postgraduate orthopaedics march 2015   biomechanicsPostgraduate orthopaedics march 2015   biomechanics
Postgraduate orthopaedics march 2015 biomechanicsnickcaplan23
 
Squat jump Biomechanics
Squat jump BiomechanicsSquat jump Biomechanics
Squat jump BiomechanicsDaniel Yazbek
 
Gate analysis
Gate analysisGate analysis
Gate analysisdrkaizar
 
Field Work Project Proposal
Field Work Project ProposalField Work Project Proposal
Field Work Project ProposalThom Manning
 
Prosthetic gait deviation
Prosthetic gait deviationProsthetic gait deviation
Prosthetic gait deviationayan ghosal
 
SAGITTAL PLANE ANALYSIS OF GAIT BY DR TABASSUM AZMI
SAGITTAL PLANE ANALYSIS OF GAIT BY DR TABASSUM AZMI SAGITTAL PLANE ANALYSIS OF GAIT BY DR TABASSUM AZMI
SAGITTAL PLANE ANALYSIS OF GAIT BY DR TABASSUM AZMI DrTabassumAzmi
 
Veterans Affairs Student Inservice
Veterans Affairs Student InserviceVeterans Affairs Student Inservice
Veterans Affairs Student InserviceKathleen Deaton
 
Kinesiology
KinesiologyKinesiology
KinesiologyKeppen
 

Similar to Poster Presentation.pptx (20)

The Effects of Heel Lift Height on Back Squat Performance
The Effects of Heel Lift Height on Back Squat PerformanceThe Effects of Heel Lift Height on Back Squat Performance
The Effects of Heel Lift Height on Back Squat Performance
 
Biomechanics of Gait, Posture and ADL
Biomechanics of Gait, Posture and ADLBiomechanics of Gait, Posture and ADL
Biomechanics of Gait, Posture and ADL
 
Gait analysis Presentation_3.pptx
Gait analysis Presentation_3.pptxGait analysis Presentation_3.pptx
Gait analysis Presentation_3.pptx
 
RealReportforSGP_NEW
RealReportforSGP_NEWRealReportforSGP_NEW
RealReportforSGP_NEW
 
biomechanics of stair climbing
biomechanics of stair climbingbiomechanics of stair climbing
biomechanics of stair climbing
 
Streaching - Dra. Deborah Gaebler
Streaching - Dra. Deborah GaeblerStreaching - Dra. Deborah Gaebler
Streaching - Dra. Deborah Gaebler
 
High flexion TKR overview
High flexion TKR overviewHigh flexion TKR overview
High flexion TKR overview
 
Postgraduate orthopaedics march 2015 biomechanics
Postgraduate orthopaedics march 2015   biomechanicsPostgraduate orthopaedics march 2015   biomechanics
Postgraduate orthopaedics march 2015 biomechanics
 
abn. gaits 28-04-2020.pdf
abn. gaits 28-04-2020.pdfabn. gaits 28-04-2020.pdf
abn. gaits 28-04-2020.pdf
 
Squat jump Biomechanics
Squat jump BiomechanicsSquat jump Biomechanics
Squat jump Biomechanics
 
Gaitortho
GaitorthoGaitortho
Gaitortho
 
Gate analysis
Gate analysisGate analysis
Gate analysis
 
phy212308
phy212308phy212308
phy212308
 
Field Work Project Proposal
Field Work Project ProposalField Work Project Proposal
Field Work Project Proposal
 
Prosthetic gait deviation
Prosthetic gait deviationProsthetic gait deviation
Prosthetic gait deviation
 
SAGITTAL PLANE ANALYSIS OF GAIT BY DR TABASSUM AZMI
SAGITTAL PLANE ANALYSIS OF GAIT BY DR TABASSUM AZMI SAGITTAL PLANE ANALYSIS OF GAIT BY DR TABASSUM AZMI
SAGITTAL PLANE ANALYSIS OF GAIT BY DR TABASSUM AZMI
 
Veterans Affairs Student Inservice
Veterans Affairs Student InserviceVeterans Affairs Student Inservice
Veterans Affairs Student Inservice
 
Carrying Angle
Carrying AngleCarrying Angle
Carrying Angle
 
Kinesiology
KinesiologyKinesiology
Kinesiology
 
GAIT.pptx
GAIT.pptxGAIT.pptx
GAIT.pptx
 

Poster Presentation.pptx

  • 1. Effects of Stiffness Changes on Ankle Kinematics and Muscle Activity Nicholas Bira, Julieth Ochoa, Cameron Arnett, Prof. Neville Hogan Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Amgen Scholars Program, Hogan Lab ABSTRACT The human ankle is an essential aspect of human locomotion, and understanding the subtle nuances of how the ankle behaves under different stressors is of interest to researchers studying locomotion. Previous studies involving both single and multiple degrees of freedom have analyzed the mobility and motility of the ankle in healthy individuals. This study aims to examine how different ankle stiffnesses affect gait. Individuals with low mobility in the ankle (high stiffness) stride differently than people with high mobility, or poor muscular control (low stiffness). We applied varying stiffnesses to healthy individuals during the walking cycle to examine their responses and muscle activity. The results of these measurements will further define ankle behavior and how various factors affect locomotion. METHODS Processing Raw Data Workflow Anklebot Butterworth Filter Segmentation based on knee angle Averaging and Stan. Deviations Zero data using initial values EMG Rectification Running Average window (200ms) Segmentation based on heel strikes Averaging and Stan. Devs. Swing Phase Swing Phase Swing Phase Stance Phase Stance Phase Stance Phase Typical Knee Angle Stride Behavior Typical D/P Stride BehaviorTypical I/E Stride Behavior • ~22 minutes of walking occurred at various stiffnesses: 1 min of starting 0, 5 min at +40, 5 min at 0, 1 min at -5, 5 min at -10, and another 5 min at 0. • Data collected included knee angle, ankle inversion/eversion, ankle dorsiflexion/plantarflexion, and EMG signals for the Tibialis Anterior, Soleus, Gastrocnemius, and Peroneus Longus (200Hz for Anklebot, 1kHz for EMGs). • 2 Degrees of Freedom in the ankle examined: Inversion/Eversion (I/E), and Dorsiflexion/Plantarflexion (D/P). Knee angles and lower leg muscle EMGs were also examined. • Mobile Anklebot setup for Overground Trials (on a 200m track) Eversion Inversion Plantarflexion Dorsiflexion Anklebot actuators, with knee brace. Kinematic data was collected from the two actuators and potentiometer.
  • 2. Results - Kinematics • Dependent variable: maximum knee flexion during swing phase • +40 produced significantly different results than neutral or -10; reduced for OG and increased for TM • Overall greater flexion in OG than TM • Dependent variable: Ankle inversion/eversion maximum knee flexion during swing phase • No significant difference between neutral stiffnesses in OG or TM • During -10 stiffness, I/E was increased in both TM and OG • During +40, I/E was decreased in both TM and OG • Dependent variable: Stride Duration • In both OG and TM walking, +40 elicited significantly greater stride duration • In OG, stride duration decreased after +40 and remained constant regardless • In TM, stride duration decreased in each epoch before jumping back up in 0_end • Dependent variable: Ankle dorsi-/plantar- flexion at maximum knee flexion during swing phase • No significant difference between +40 and following 0 in OG or TM • During -10, DP was significantly greater in OG and lesser in TM • This trend continued for OG but returned to normal for TM • Two-factor ANOVAs over 800 strides • Knee, DP, and IE angle were extracted from the moment of maximum knee flexion during swing phase • Stride duration is the elapsed time between heel strikes • Independent variables: • Walking Environment (TM, OG) • Stiffness Value (+40, 0_middle, -10, 0_end) • 0.05 significance level was set for all statistical tests • A significant interaction was observed between walking environment and stiffness (p<0.05) • Post hoc analyses using Tukey’s HSD test were conducted to examine marginal means for stiffness condition • Overall statistically greater values for OG when compared to TM for knee and D/P, and lesser for I/E and stride duration. • -10 stiffness had greatest effect on all studied aspects. Inversion Eversion Dorsiflexion Plantarflexion Treadmill and Overground Mean Stride Behaviors per Epoch TM OG
  • 3. Results – Overground EMGs • Two-factor ANOVAs were conducted on 420 strides • Examining the effect of imposed ankle stiffness on maximum EMG activation levels during 4 different segments of the gait cycle in OG walking: 0-10% (initial contact & loading response), 40-60% (terminal stance and pre-swing), 60-80% (initial and mid swing), and 80-100% (mid and terminal swing) • A 0.05 significance level was set for all statistical tests. • Independent variables: Stiffness Value (0_initial, +40, 0_middle, -10, 0_end) and Muscle Type (TA, PL, SOL, GAS) • Dependent variable: Maximum EMG Activation Levels • Soleus alone displayed significant differences during the 0-10% epoch • Increased between stiffness changes, and only for the - 10 and following 0 stiffness • SOL and GAS statistically increased across all epochs, except GAS decreased following the -10 epoch • TA activation levels decreased significantly for all stiff • No effects in PL • PL and SOL increased for each of the progressive epochs (especially SOL) • TA displayed decreased magnitude as trial proceeded • No significant effects in GAS • SOL displayed significant increases for each of the progressive epochs • No significant effects in PL, TA, or GAS TA SOLSOL SOL GAS SOL PL All four muscles examined play important roles in normal walking and stabilization of the ankle.
  • 4. Conclusions/Future Work • Anklebot restricts rotation about the I/E plane with applied stiffnesses, but not in the D/P plane. • While variations in the I/E plane are apparent for the different stiffnesses, there are also statistically significant differences in D/P angle as well. • This suggests coupling between I/E and D/P • The EMG data from overground suggests that the Soleus is profoundly affected by different stiffnesses, in particular, that proceeding from a positive stiffness to a negative one generates increased muscle activity that lasts beyond the cause • The TA seems to be noticeably affected by the negative 10 stiffness during the swing phase of the stride • The TA is involved in lifting the toes, and this behavior may be the result of the ankle attempting to stabilize and compensate for the negative stiffness. • Treadmill and Overground demonstrate markedly different magnitudes in angle magnitude • This indicates that treadmill and overground may be different in how they induce walking, unlike some previous studies that indicate the two produce equivalent results • On treadmill, steps seem to be less pronounced as a possible result of the instability felt while walking • Overground may encourage longer strides and more pronounced movements as a result of better posture and forward facing movement • Distinct effort will be taken to collect further trials from multiple subjects using the processing methods in this presentation • Muscle EMGs will be calibrated to maximum voluntary contraction from standardized procedures in future trials • A more thorough examination of the differences between TM and OG, eliminating differences such as walking speed, stride length, etc.