"ממחאת אוהלים למחאת גלגלים": מחירי הרכב מכון ירושלים לחקר שווקים מנבא מחאה ציבורית נגד מחירי המכוניות המכון גם מצביע על הסיבות למחירים הגבוהים ומציע רפורמה הממשלה אחראית למחירי המכוניות הגבוהים בישראל, על פי מחקר של מכון ירושלים לחקר שווקים שפורסם היום, ה-16 באוגוסט 2011. • שיטת המיסוי הירוק העלתה למרבית הרכבים את אחוז המס, במקום מס קניה של 72% – מרבית הרכבים משלמים מס בגובה 83% ויותר – מהגבוהים בעולם • עלינו לחסוך משכורות של למעלה משנה לרכישת רכב ממוצע • רמת המינוע (מספר רכבים ל-1,000 תושבים) בישראל - מהנמוכות בעולם • כפל מסים ומכסים גבוהים מוטלים על יבוא אישי ועל חלקי החילוף ומונעים טיפול נאות ברכב • שיטת הליסינג מועדפת ע"י האוצר ופוגעת בצרכנים • סבסוד הביטוח לבעלי אופנועים ייקר את הביטוח לכל בעל רכב במאות ש"ח

1. : ¯
"
2011
JIMS Position Paper Series
¯

2. – ¯
. ¯ , ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯
¯ . " 8,454 ¯ ¯
1
. – . ¯ ¯
, "
, ¯ . ¯
, ¯. ,
2
. , , , ,10% ¯
20) . ¯ ¯ ¯, ¯
¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ (2011
" ¯" . ¯
3
. ¯" 28 ¯ ¯"
¯
, ¯ ¯ , , . ¯,
, ¯
¯ ¯ . ¯
, ¯ ¯ , ¯
, ¯ , . ¯
. ¯
1
, ¯
.2009
2
:
", 10
;2011 25 ," 30 : ", ,
.http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000666232 ,2011 20 ," ' 25 ¯
3
http://www.calcalist.co.il/local/articles/0,7340,L-, ," ¯ , : ", ¯ ¯
," ¯ ", ;2011 20 , 3525080,00.html
.2011 20 ,http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000666075
2

3. ¯ , . ¯
, .72% ,75% ¯ ¯
." " – 2009
¯ ,83% 75% ¯ ,
, ¯ .30% ¯ , ¯ ¯
¯ ¯ 72% . ¯ –
. ¯ ," " ¯ " " ¯
.
83% . ¯ , ¯¯
, . 5 ¯
.100% ¯, ¯ " , ¯
, ¯ ¯
¯ ¯ .
. ¯
. ( 1,000 ¯ )
¯ ,¯ ¯
¯ ¯ ¯ ,
, ¯ ¯ ¯ . ¯ ¯ , ¯
¯ 9 7¯
. ¯ , . ¯ 50%
¯
¯ , ¯ ¯ ¯
" ¯ ¯ ¯ .
, ¯ . "
, ¯ " , ¯ ,83% ¯ ,¯ ,
4
. ¯ 100% . ¯ " " ¯
¯ ¯ ¯ , ¯ ¯
¯ ¯ , ¯
4
. http://www.themarker.com/misc/tags/1.3430 , ¯ ,( ¯) " ¯ " ,
3

4. ) ¯, 4¯ ¯ .
5
. (
¯ ¯ ¯ , ¯ ¯
. ¯ ¯ ¯ ,
¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ,
6
. ¯ ¯ ¯
¯ ¯ ¯ .
¯ ¯, ¯ ¯ ,
¯ ¯ ¯ ,' '¯
7
.
, ¯ , ¯ ¯
8
¯ . 5 . ¯
¯ ¯ " , ,
9
2010 , ¯ .
10
¯ .31% 0.5% , ¯
.(83%)
, ¯ ¯
¯ ,( 1,000 ¯ ¯ ¯' ) ¯ , " ¯
1,000 ¯ ¯ ¯ 326 ¯ 2009 .
1,000 ¯ ¯ 500 ¯ – 1.5 ¯ ¯ ¯ ,11
12
1 .
¯ ( ¯ ) 2008
. ¯
5
. http://www.themarker.com/misc/tags/1.3430 ,2009 23 ," : ¯ ",
6
." ¯ " ,
7
.
8
", .2011
, 26 ,"
9
.5 , ,2009 , ¯ ," ¯ ",
10
EUROSTAT, European Commission, Taxation trends in the European Union, Data for the EU Member States, Iceland and
Norway, 2011 Edition, p. 249, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-DU-11-001/EN/KS-DU-11-001-EN.PDF
11
.2011 13 ,"2010 ¯ ¯ 2.46" : , ¯ ¯
.http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/newhodaot/hodaa_template.html?hodaa=201027152
12
EUROSTAT, European Commission, Candidate and potential candidate countries, Transport and Energy, 2011 Edition, p. 3,
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-30-10-628/EN/KS-30-10-628-EN.PDF
4

5. 1
,
2008 , 1,000 ¯ ¯
," 2008 ¯ ¯ 2.4" , , ¯ ¯ :
,http://www.cbs.gov.il/reader/newhodaot/hodaa_template.html?hodaa=200927133
;(324 – ) 2009 29
EUROSTAT, European Commission, Energy, transport and environment indicators, 2011 Edition, p. 94,
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-DK-10-001/EN/KS-DK-10-001-EN.PDF
, ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯
¯, ¯ .7% ¯ , ¯ ¯ .
. ¯ ,83% ¯
¯ ,2008
13
, , , .75% 95%
," ", ¯ 2009
¯ ¯ , ¯ ,
." "
¯ " " , ¯ ¯ ¯ ,
. ¯ 75%
13
.3 4 ,2011 21 ,"2010 ¯ ", ¯ ¯ ¯ , ,
.4 ," ¯ ", ;http://ozar.mof.gov.il/taxes/docs/rechev2011.pdf
5

6. ¯, 72% ¯ 75%
14
, .2010 ¯ 72%
¯¯ ¯ ¯ ,90% , ¯ 72% ¯ 75%
¯ 2010 , . ¯ ¯
" 2,400 ¯ ¯ ,83% ¯, ¯
15
.1 . ¯ ¯ , ¯ ¯ ¯
1
" " ¯
¯ /
¯ ,2008 95% 2008
,
.75% 95%
¯ 75% 2009 2008
72% 2010 "
"
" ¯ ¯ 90% 25 2009 2
¯ –" 2009
¯ ¯¯
" 2,400 ¯ 83% 2009 25
, ¯ ESP ¯
, ¯
¯
.http://ozar.mof.gov.il/taxes/ ,2010 10 ," ", , :
(2010 ) ¯ , ¯ ¯ ,
2 . ¯
" ¯ ¯ 1.4% ¯ ," ¯ – " ":
14
.2 ,3 , , ,
15
.
6

7. 2
¯ –" "
:
¯ ¯
¯
"
" "
( ) , " ) ¯
2009
(2009
¯ ) 0 50
10% 10% 1
(
30% 30% 1.4% ( ) 51 130
2
38% 15,000 83% 0.3% 51 130
50% 13,750 83% 0.9% 131 150 3
54% 12,000 83% 10.7% 151 170 4
58% 10,500 83% 6.3% 171 175 5
60% 9,250 83% 11.9% 176 180 6
64% 8,250 83% 8.9% 181 185 7
67% 7,250 83% 9.6% 186 190 8
70% 6,500 83% 6.1% 191 195 9
71% 5,500 83% 13.5% 196 200 10
73% 5,000 83% 3.3% 201 205 11
74% 4,000 83% 7.2% 206 210 12
77% 3,250 83% 4.9% 211 220 13
80% 2,000 83% 7.6% 221 250 14
83% 0 83% 7.3% 251 15
," ¯ " ,5 ,2010 10 ," " , , :
.http://ozar.mof.gov.il/taxes/
7

8. 83% 89.6% ¯ , ¯ .30% ¯ , "
. " 1,500 0
15 , ¯ ,2 ¯
, , , ¯ .
. ¯ ¯ 1.4% ¯ ¯ ,30%
,
¯ , ¯ . ¯ ¯ ¯ , , ¯
16
. ,
¯ , ,
2010 3 : . ¯ " 45%
17
. .( ) ¯
2008 2009 ¯ ,
.75% ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯
90% 2009 , ¯) 2009
¯ ¯ ¯ , ¯ ,(83% ¯
18
.2 .2009 14.5% 2010
¯ 2010 . ¯ ¯ 2010
2010 ¯ ¯ .1995 ¯
19
. ¯ – 72% 83% – ¯
¯ , ¯ ¯
¯ ¯ ¯ 2010 ¯ . ¯
61 " 291 2010 , ¯. 9.4 ¯
.2009 ¯ 12.26% 5% ¯ "
.3
16
,2011 6 ," ' 30 : , , ",
http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000660935
17
.
18
.2 , , , :
19
.
8

9. 2
2003 2010 ¯ ¯
21 ,2010 ¯ ", ¯ ¯ ¯ , , :
http://ozar.mof.gov.il/taxes/docs/rechev2011.pdf ,2 ,2011
3
( , " ) 2003 2010 ¯ ¯ ¯
¯ ¯
¯ ¯
51 219 225 4,774 2003
47 242 310 6,287 2004
48 232 321 6,507 2005
40 227 320 6,659 2006
47 267 414 8,029 2007
52 277 437 7,659 2008
53 270 417 7,277 2009
61 291 474 8,557 2010
12.26% 4.99% 10.71% 14.51% *
.2 ,2011 21 ,2010 ¯ ", ¯ ¯ ¯ , , :
.2009 2010 , – *
9

10. ¯ , , ,
," " ¯ ¯
, ¯ . ¯
20
.
. ¯ ¯ " ¯ " ¯
) 7% ¯ , , 83% ¯
,16% ,( ¯ ¯
. ¯ , ¯
¯ ¯ " 8.5 ¯ ,
¯ ¯ .
, ¯ ¯ , 30
21
. ¯
¯ ¯
¯
,( ¯ ) ¯ 122,826 2011 ¯
22
. ¯ 103,936 ¯ ,(2010 ) 16%
. " ¯ ( ) ¯ ¯
¯ " ¯ . ¯
23
. ¯ ¯
, "¯ , , ¯ ¯ ¯ 650,000
24
. ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ .
25
.34% ,( ¯ ¯ ) 51% ¯ ¯ ¯ 2010
¯
¯ 2 ¯ ¯ .
26
. 31% ,20% i20 ,9% ¯
20
: , ,? ¯ ¯ , " , "
. http://www.psakdin.co.il/fileprint.asp?FileName=/Misim/Public/art_caza.htm
21
." , , ",
22
. http://www.vehiclesnet.org.il/statistics ,( , ) 2011 , ¯
23
." , , ",
24
.12 , , , :
25
.11 ,
26
." ", ,
10

11. ¯ ¯ ¯– ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯
¯ , ,
. ¯
. ¯ ¯ ¯
" " ¯ , , ¯
. , ¯ ¯.
27
, . ¯ ¯
28
¯
. , ¯ ¯
, ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯
29
. ¯ ¯
¯ , ¯ , ¯
¯ . ¯ " ¯ " ,
¯ ... ¯ ¯ ":
,(30% ) ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ . ¯
¯ ¯ . ' ' ¯ ¯
30
." ¯ , ¯
¯ , ¯ , ¯
. ,
31
. , ¯
" ,
, . ¯ ": ¯ 2009
¯ , ¯ ¯ ( ) ¯
32
". ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ , ¯
27
.15 17 ," ¯ ",
28
.
29
.
30
.12 ,11 ,8 , , ,
,2011 4 ," , , ", 31
. http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000658204
32
,2010 11 , ¯ ¯ " " , ,
. http://ozar.mof.gov.il/taxes/odaa110810.pdf
11

12. ' ' , ¯ ¯ ": ¯ ¯
¯, , ¯ , ¯
33
." 2010 : .
¯
20 ¯ ¯ . ( ¯ , ) ¯
¯ 9 7 ¯. ¯
50% ¯ .
,(12%) ' ,(15%) ,(18%) " ¯: ¯
34
.3 .(10%)
3
,http://www.vehiclesnet.org.il/statistics ,( , ) 2011 , ¯ :
.2011 21 : ¯
33
." , , ",
34
. , ¯ :
12

13. ,15% : ¯ 50% ¯ , ¯
35
. 4% ¯ 6% , .7% ,9% ,11%
.4
4
. http://www.vehiclesnet.org.il/statistics ,( , ) 2011 , ¯ :
–
– . " , , ¯ : ¯
¯– ¯ .7% ¯ – ¯
, ¯ 83% ¯ . ¯ – "
36
, ¯ ¯ .16% "
.
35
.
36
? ¯ ¯ , :( ¯ )
13

14. ¯ ¯, 128% 113% ¯ ¯ 4
¯ . ¯
¯ , / ¯
¯ ¯ .4 ' ¯ ,51% 113%
. ' ¯ ,62% 128%
4
2010 ¯ , ¯
' '
¯ ' ) )
( ¯ ( ¯
¯ / / ¯ 113% ¯ 128% ¯
¯ 100% ¯ 115% ¯
21 ¯ 51% ¯ 62% ¯
, ¯ , ¯ ¯ : ," ¯ ", , :
.http://ozar.mof.gov.il/customs/RECHEV.HTM#h1
:( ' ) ¯ *
. ¯ ¯ .1
. ¯ ¯ .2
(EUR1) " / ¯ .3
(CERTIFICATE OF ORIGIN) / " ¯ .4
: **
. ' ¯ ( ¯ ) ¯
.' ¯ ( ¯ ) " ¯
¯ ,( ¯ ) ( ¯ ) ¯
. '
¯ , ¯ ¯ , "
, .
" : ¯ ¯
¯ ...
37
." " , ¯ ¯
¯ ) ¯ ¯ , ¯ ": "
,( ¯ " ¯ ¯
38
". ¯ ¯ , ¯ ¯
37
? ¯ ¯ ,
38
.
14

15. ¯
¯ , , ¯ *
*
( ) *
¯ ¯ ¯ *
*
¯ ¯ *
¯ *
¯ – *
*
6 22% ¯ ¯ 2010
61% ,2016 2012 4% 3% ¯ ¯,
39
¯ OECD 2010 ¯ .
OECD " ¯ . ¯ ¯
¯ . ¯
¯ ¯
40
.
¯ ¯ ¯,
, ¯ ." ¯ "
¯ ¯ ,(2010 11) " " ¯
75% – , ,
¯ " ,2011 21 , ¯ .83%
¯ , ,"2010
. ¯
39
,2010 24 ," 6 22% ¯ ¯ ", ,
. http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000561534
40
. ¯ ," ¯ ",
15

16. ¯
5 . ¯
, , ,
¯ . ¯ ¯ ¯
, ¯ ¯ ¯
" ( 1,000 ¯ ) .
.
, ¯ ¯ ,
¯ . ¯ ¯ ¯ 50%
, ¯ ¯ ¯
¯ , ¯ ,¯ .
. ¯ , ¯ ¯
¯, ¯ ,¯ ¯
. " ¯ 140% ¯
. ¯
, ¯ ¯
.
¯ ¯ ¯ ¯
" 30 ¯ ¯ ¯ ¯ , ¯
¯ , ,¯ .
¯ , , " , ¯
¯ ( , ¯ , , ) ¯ .
" " ¯ ¯ ¯
.
16