The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...
Port-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context.
1. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Port-City governance
A comparative analysis in the European context
jose.sanchez@hcu-hamburg.de
theportandthecity.wordpress.com
José M P Sánchez - Architect & PhD Candidate - Hafencity University
March 2016, Ghent, Belgium
2. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Evolution of the Port-City Interface
Stages in the evolution of port-city interrelationships
according to Hoyle's model (2000)
3. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Changes in the maritime transport chain
Changes in the Port-City Relation
ISPS CODE
6. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
3 Main Topics:
Institutional Relation
Physical Interaction
Social Integration of Ports
7. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Institutional Relation
North vs South
Centralized vs Decentralized
Different Investment priorities
Institutional and emotional
detachment
Who is the majority shareholder?
8. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Institutional Relation
Land Ownership
Helsinki
Rotterdam
The City
Oslo
Marseille
The Port Autority
Genoa
Lisbon
The Central State
9. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Institutional Relation
Relation between city and port
Relation between cities and port http://madeinmarseille.net/
10. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
http://splash247.com/
http://www.maritime-executive.com
http://fionajack.net//
Institutional Relation
Port Community reluctant to change
The Unions The Port Companies
13. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Physical Interaction
6 cases – Many projects
Helsinki
West Harbor
Kalasatama
Oslo
Fjord City
Genoa
Blueprint
Lisbon
Waterfront Plan
Marseille
Euroméditerranée
Rotterdam
Kop van Zuid
Stadshavens
14. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Physical Interaction
Table 1 Dimensions of waterfront
(re-)development for comparative
perspectives, adapted from
Schubert (2011). In the case of
Lisbon there is no current major
waterfront regeneration project.
15. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Physical Interaction
Contracts
Long term agreements
Large compensations
Difficulties implementing the plan
16. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Physical Interaction
Planning agencies - Quangos
Agencies created to deal with the specific
waterfront and port interface issues
Stadshavens
Frente Tejo
Genoa Lab
Euroméditerranée
17. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Physical Interaction
Different Planning Paths
Classical approach: “port out – city in”
New approach: planning inside the active port
18. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Physical Interaction
Classical Approach: “Port out – City in”
Helsinki
West Harbor
Kalasatama
Oslo
Fjord City
Rotterdam
Kop van Zuid
19. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Physical Interaction
New Approach: Planning inside the active port
Genoa
Blueprint
Rotterdam
Stadshavens
20. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Physical Interaction
Combination of both tendencies
Marseille
Euroméditerranée
21. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Physical Interaction
Single projects
Lisbon
New Cruise Terminal
Braço de prata
Waterfront Public space
Champalimaud
22. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Emotional Relation
Two Key Concepts
Social License to Operate (SLO)
In its broader concept, fulfilling the expectations of stakeholder and local
communities in dimensions that go beyond the creation of wealth, i.e. the social
acceptance of port activities by local communities.
(Dooms, 2014)
Soft Values of Seaports
non-socioeconomic values which include among others historical, sociological,
artistic and cultural sub-functions that form the soft-function of seaports
(Van Hooydonk, 2007)
23. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Emotional Relation
4 Main Fields of Action
Education
Communication
Heritage
Social Agenda
Port-City Identity
24. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Emotional Relation
Education
Collaboration with educational institutions
Port Centers
25. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Emotional Relation
Communication
The port is a reality that
must be explained
(Van Stiphout, 2007)
26. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Emotional Relation
Heritage
How can we integrate port industrial heritage in the
waterfront plans?
Musealization or new use?
Respect the local genius Loci
27. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Emotional Relation
Social Agenda
Port Festivals – Open days
Folklore
28. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Conclusions
From Integration to coexistence
The context determines the solution for common issues
From Beauty Waterfront to Productive Waterfront
New role of the Port Authority – Beyond the Landlord
For the SLO the social integration of ports plays a key role
29. theportandthecity.wordpress.comPort-City governance. A comparative analysis in the European context. j o s e . s a n c h e z @ h c u - h a m b u r g . d e
Crossovers
AIVP 15 World Conference
http://citiesandports2016.aivp.org/en/
Thank you!