SlideShare a Scribd company logo
A Publication of Hillsdale College



Imprimis                                Over 1,900,000 Reader s Monthly
                                            May/June 2011 • Volume 40, Number 5/6




The Right to Work:
A Fundamental Freedom
Mark Mix
President, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation


  Mark Mix is president of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation,
            as well as of the National Right to Work Committee, a 2.2 million
            member public policy organization. He holds a B.A. in finance from
            James Madison University and an associate’s degree in marketing
            from the State University of New York. His writings have appeared
            in such newspapers and magazines as the Wall Street Journal, the
            Washington Times, the Detroit Free Press, the San Antonio Express-
            News, the Orange County Register and National Review.



The following is adapted from a lecture delivered at Hillsdale College on January 31, 2011,
during a conference co-sponsored by the Center for Constructive Alternatives and the
Ludwig von Mises Lecture Series.

Boeing is a great American company. Recently it has built a second production
line—its other is in Washington State—in South Carolina for its 787 Dreamliner
airplane, creating 1,000 jobs there so far. Who knows what factors led to its decision
to do this? As with all such business decisions, there were many. But the National
Labor Relations Board (NLRB)—a five-member agency created in 1935 by the Wagner
Act (about which I will speak momentarily)—has taken exception to this decision,
ultimately based on the fact that South Carolina is a right-to-work state. That is, South
Carolina, like 21 other states today, protects a worker’s right not only to join a union,
but also to make the choice not to join or financially support a union. Washington
State does not. The general counsel of the NLRB, on behalf of the International
Association of Machinists union, has issued a complaint against Boeing, which, if
successful, would require it to move its South Carolina operation back to Washington
State. This would represent an unprecedented act of intervention by the federal
government that appears, on its face, un-American. But it is an act long in the making,
and boils down to a fundamental misunderstanding of freedom.
	 Where does this story begin?


                             hill sdale.edu
Hillsdale College: Pursuing Truth • Defending Libert y since 1844


    The Wagner Act and                                        clear principle that the freedom to associ-

    Taft-Hartley                                              ate necessarily includes the freedom not
                                                              to associate. In other words, the Wagner
    In 1935, Congress passed and President                    Act didn’t protect the freedom of work-
    Franklin Roosevelt signed into law the                    ers because it didn’t allow for them to
    National Labor Relations Act (NLRA),                      decide against union membership. To
    commonly referred to as the Wagner                        be sure, the Wagner Act left states the
    Act after its Senate sponsor, New York                    prerogative to protect employees from
    Democrat Robert Wagner. Section 7 of                      compulsory union membership. But fed-
    the Wagner Act states:                                    eral law was decidedly one-sided: Firing
                                                              or refusing to hire a worker because he
        Employees shall have the right to                     or she had joined a union was a federal
        self-organization, to form, join,                     crime, whereas firing or refusing to hire
        or assist labor organizations, to                     a worker for not joining a union with
        bargain collectively through rep-                     “exclusive” bargaining privileges was
        resentatives of their own choosing,                   federally protected. The National Labor
        and to engage in other concerted                      Relations Board was created by the
        activities for the purpose of collec-                 Wagner Act to enforce these policies.
        tive bargaining or other mutual aid                   	 During World War II, FDR’s War
        or protection.                                        Labor Board aggressively promoted com-
                                                              pulsory union membership. By the end
    	 Union officials such as William                         of the war, the vast majority of unionized
    Green, president of the American                          workers in America were covered by con-
    Federation of Labor (AFL), and John                       tracts requiring them to belong to a union
    L. Lewis, prin-                                                               in order to keep their
    cipal founder                 	−´                                             jobs. But Americans
                                             Imprimis (im-pri-mis),
    of the Congress                         [Latin]: in the first place           were coming to see
    of Industrial                                                                 compulsory union
                                                      Editor
    Organizations (CIO),                       Douglas A. Jeffrey                 membership—euphe-
    hailed this legisla-                        Deputy Editor                     mistically referred to
    tion at the time as                       Timothy W. Caspar                   as “union security”—as
                                                 Copy Editors
    the “Magna Carta                              Emily Thiessen                  a violation of the free-
    of Labor.” But in                        Monica VanDerWeide                   dom of association.
    fact it was far from a                       Art Director
                                                Angela Lashaway
                                                                                  Furthermore, the non-
    charter of liberty for                  Marketing Director                    chalance with which
    working Americans.                             Fred Hadra                     union bosses like John
    	 Section 8(3) of the                  Production Manager
                                                 Lucinda Grimm
                                                                                  L. Lewis paralyzed
    Wagner Act allowed                     Circulation Manager                    the economy by call-
    for “agreements”                            Wanda Oxenger                     ing employees out on
    between employ-                            Staff Assistants
                                                   Robin Curtis
                                                                                  strike in 1946 hard-
    ers and officers of                           Kim Ellsworth                   ened public support
                                                   Kathy Smith
    a union requiring                         Mary Jo Von Ewegen                  for the right to work as
    union membership                                                              opposed to compulsory
    “as a condition of                 Copyright © 2011 Hillsdale College         unionism. As Gilbert
                                    The opinions expressed in Imprimis are not
    employment” if the               necessarily the views of Hillsdale College.  J. Gall, a staunch pro-
    union was certi-                Permission to reprint in whole or in part is  ponent of the latter,
                                  hereby granted, provided the following credit
    fied or recognized             line is used: “Reprinted by permission from    acknowledged in a
    as the employees’             Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College.”  monograph chroni-
                                   Subscription free upon request.
    “exclusive” bargain-                                                          cling legislative battles
                                                 ISSN 0277-8432
    ing agent on matters              Imprimis trademark registered in U.S.       over this issue from
    of pay, benefits, and           Patent and Trademark Office #1563325.         the 1940s on, “the huge
    work rules. On its                                                            post-war strike wave
    face, this violates the                                                       and other problems of
2
May/June 2011 • Volume 40, Number 5/6  hillsdale.edu

reconversion gave an added impetus to
right-to-work proposals.”                    An audio version of Imprimis
	 When dozens of senators and con-               is available online at
gressmen who backed compulsory                 hillsdale.edu/imprimis
unionism were ousted in the 1946 elec-
tion, the new Republican leaders of
Congress had a clear opportunity to         But they could still be forced to join, on
curb the legal power of union bosses to     threat of being fired, within a few weeks
force workers to join unions. Instead,      after starting on the job.
they opted for a compromise that they
thought would have enough congres-
sional support to override a presidential   Boeing’s Interest,
veto by President Truman. Thus Section      and Ours
7 of the revised National Labor Relations
Act of 1947—commonly referred to as         It cannot be overemphasized that com-
the Taft-Hartley Act—only appears at        pulsory unionism violates the first princi-
first to represent an improvement over      ple of the original labor union movement
Section 7 of the Wagner Act. It begins:     in America. Samuel Gompers, founder
                                            and first president of the AFL, wrote
   Employees shall have the right to        that the labor movement was “based
   self-organization, to form, join,        upon the recognition of the sovereignty
   or assist labor organizations, to        of the worker.” Officers of the AFL, he
   bargain collectively through rep-        explained in the American Federationist,
   resentatives of their own choosing,      can “suggest” or “recommend,” but they
   and to engage in other concerted         “can not command one man in America
   activities for the purpose of collec-    to do anything.” He continued: “Under
   tive bargaining or other mutual aid      no circumstances can they say, ‘you
   or protection, and shall also have       must do so and so,’ or, ‘you must desist
   the right to refrain from any and all    from doing so and so.’” In a series of
   such activities. . . .                   Federationist editorials published during
                                            World War I, Gompers opposed various
	 Had this sentence ended there,            government mandate measures being
forced union membership would have          considered in the capitals of industrial
been prohibited, and at the same time       states like Massachusetts and New York
voluntary union membership would have       that would have mandated certain provi-
remained protected. Unfortunately, the      sions for manual laborers and other select
sentence continued:                         groups of workers:

   …except to the extent that such             The workers of America adhere to
   right may be affected by an agree-          voluntary institutions in preference
   ment requiring membership in a              to compulsory systems which are
   labor organization as a condition of        held to be not only impractical but a
   employment as authorized in sec-            menace to their rights, welfare and
   tion 158(a)(3) of this title.               their liberty.

	 This qualification, placing federal
policy firmly on the side of compulsory     This argument applies as much to
union membership, left workers little       compulsory unionism—or “union
better off than they were under the         security”—as to the opposite idea that
Wagner Act. Elsewhere, Taft-Hartley         unions should be prohibited. And in
did, for the most part, prohibit “closed    a December 1918 address before the
shop” arrangements that forced work-        Council on Foreign Relations, Gompers
ers to join a union before being hired.     made this point explicitly:
                                                                                          3
buZiOs | ilha grande | paraty | santOs/sÃO paulO
    i ta J a i | p u n ta d e l e s t e | M O n t e v i d e O



Hillsdale College Cruise
    Rio De Janeiro to Buenos Aires
    February 20 - March 3, 2012
    Aboard the Crystal Symphony                        Onboard Speakers
                                                                    Bing West
                                                                    Author, The Wrong War: Grit, Strategy,
                                                                    and the Way Out of Afghanistan

                                                                    Norman Podhoretz
                                                                    Author, World War IV: The Long
                                                                    Struggle Against Islamofascism

                                                                    Midge Decter
                                                                    Author and Editor


                                                                    Larry P. Arnn
                                                                    President, Hillsdale College


                                                        ADDITIONAL SPEAKERS
                                                        TO BE ANNOUNCED!


                       spaCe is liMited!
                                                         book your cabin by June 30
   For more information or to reserve your cabin,
                                                         and receive additional savings!
please call Moneyshow at (800) 797-9519.



        There may be here and there a worker        Employees International Union, was even
        who for certain reasons unexplain-          more blunt. When it comes to union
        able to us does not join a union of         organizing campaigns, he told the Wall
        labor. This is his right no matter how      Street Journal, “We don’t do elections.”
        morally wrong he may be. It is his              Under a decades-old political com-
        legal right and no one can dare ques-       promise, federal labor policies promoting
        tion his exercise of that legal right.      compulsory unionism persist side by side
                                                    with the ability of states to curb such com-
     Compare Gompers’s traditional                  pulsion with right-to-work laws. So far, as
     American view of freedom to the con-           I said, 22 states have done so. And when
     temptuous view toward workers of labor         we compare and contrast the economic
     leaders today. Here is United Food and         performance in these 22 states against
     Commercial Workers union strategist Joe        the others, we find interesting things.
     Crump advising union organizers in a           For example, from 1999 to 2009 (the last
     1991 trade journal article: “Employees are     such year for which data are available), the
     complex and unpredictable. Employers           aggregate real all-industry GDP of the 22
     are simple and predictable. Organize           right-to-work states grew by 24.2 percent,
     employers, not employees.” And in              nearly 40 percent more than the gain reg-
     2005, Mike Fishman, head of the Service        istered by the other 28 states as a group.
4
MAY/JUNE 2011 • VOLUME 40, NUMBER 5/6  hillsdale.edu

    Even more dramatic is the contrast if           ago: “We have the ability, in a sense, to
we look at personal income growth. From             elect our own boss.”
2000 to 2010, real personal incomes grew                How this works is simple, and explains
by an average of 24.3 percent in the 22             the inordinate power of union officials
right-to-work states, more than double              in so many states that have not adopted
the rate for the other 28 as a group. But           right-to-work laws. Union officials funnel
the strongest indicator is the migration            a huge portion of the compulsory dues and
of young adults. In 2009, there were 20             fees they collect into efforts to influence the
percent more 25- to 34-year-olds in right-          outcomes of elections. In return, elected
to-work states than in 1999. In the com-            officials are afraid to anger them even in
pulsory union states, the increase was only         the face of financial crisis. This explains
3.3 percent—barely one-sixth as much.               why states with the heaviest tax burdens
    In this context, the decision by Boeing         and the greatest long-term fiscal imbal-
to open a plant in South Carolina may be            ances (in many cases due to bloated public
not only in its own best interest, but in           employee pension funds) are those with
ours as well. So in whose interest is the           the most unionized government work-
National Labor Relations Board acting?              forces. California, Illinois, Massachusetts,
And more importantly, with a view to                Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New York,
what understanding of freedom?                      Ohio and Wisconsin represent the worst
                                                    default risks among the 50 states. In 2010,

Public Sector                                       an average of 59.2 percent of the public
                                                    employees in these nine worst default-risk
Unionism                                            states were unionized, 19.2 percentage
                                                    points higher than the national average
As more and more workers and businesses             of 40 percent. All of these states except
have obtained refuge from compulsory                Nevada authorize compulsory union dues
unionism in right-to-work states in recent          and fees in the public sector.
decades, the rationality of the free market
has been showing itself. But the public sec-                             ***
tor is another and a grimmer story.                     Fortunately, there are signs that
    The National Labor Relations Act               taxpayers are recognizing the negative
affects only private-sector workers. Since         consequences of compulsory unionism
the 1960s, however, 21 states have enacted         in the public sector. Just this March, leg-
laws authorizing the collection of forced          islatures in Wisconsin and Ohio revoked
union dues from at least some state and            compulsory powers of government union
local public employees. More than a dozen bosses, and similar efforts are underway
additional states have granted union               in several other states. Furthermore,
officials the monopoly power to speak              the NLRB’s blatantly political and un-
for all government workers whether they            constitutional power play with regard to
consent to this or not. Thus today, govern-        Boeing’s South Carolina production line
ment workers are more than five times              is sure to strike fair-minded Americans
as likely to be unionized as private sector        as beyond the pale. Now more than ever,
workers. This represents a great danger            it is time to push home the point that
for taxpayers and                                                         all American work-
consumers of govern-                                                      ers in all 50 states
ment services. For as                                                     should be granted
Victor Gotbaum, head                                                      the full freedom of
of the Manhattan-                                                         association—which
                                      did yOu knOW?
based District 37 of the                                                  includes the freedom
                              two hundr e d eight y-si x s tudent s
American Federation           graduated from hillsdale college on         not to associate—in
of State, County and          May 14. author and journalist Mark          the area of union
                              helprin delivered the commencement
Municipal Employees           address, entitled “churchill and the        membership. I
union, said 36 years          Presidency.” this address can be viewed
                             online at hillsdale.edu/helprin.
                                                                                                      5

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Pi 2012 03 imprimis
Pi 2012 03 imprimisPi 2012 03 imprimis
Pi 2012 03 imprimis
Michael LaPlante
 
Oral portfolios
Oral portfoliosOral portfolios
Oral portfolios
E MendezG
 
Looking for sources
Looking for sourcesLooking for sources
Looking for sources
E MendezG
 
Pi 2011 07 imprimis
Pi 2011 07 imprimisPi 2011 07 imprimis
Pi 2011 07 imprimis
Michael LaPlante
 
Pi 2011 11 imprimis
Pi 2011 11 imprimisPi 2011 11 imprimis
Pi 2011 11 imprimis
Michael LaPlante
 
Chapter 1-indian-ethos
Chapter 1-indian-ethosChapter 1-indian-ethos
Chapter 1-indian-ethos
nimisha_singhal04
 
Pi 2012 12-18-presidents-essay the march of freedom
Pi 2012 12-18-presidents-essay the march of freedomPi 2012 12-18-presidents-essay the march of freedom
Pi 2012 12-18-presidents-essay the march of freedom
Michael LaPlante
 
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
Why network why 4 lifeyes 24LIFEYES
 
Why network why 4 lifeyes 3
Why network why 4 lifeyes 3Why network why 4 lifeyes 3
Why network why 4 lifeyes 3
4LIFEYES
 
ตัวอย่างผู้ใช้ผลิตภัณฑ์ต่างประเทศ
ตัวอย่างผู้ใช้ผลิตภัณฑ์ต่างประเทศตัวอย่างผู้ใช้ผลิตภัณฑ์ต่างประเทศ
ตัวอย่างผู้ใช้ผลิตภัณฑ์ต่างประเทศ
4LIFEYES
 
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
4LIFEYES
 
5อ 1พ เพื่อสุขภาพที่ดีและมีอายุยืนยาว
5อ 1พ เพื่อสุขภาพที่ดีและมีอายุยืนยาว5อ 1พ เพื่อสุขภาพที่ดีและมีอายุยืนยาว
5อ 1พ เพื่อสุขภาพที่ดีและมีอายุยืนยาว
4LIFEYES
 

Viewers also liked (12)

Pi 2012 03 imprimis
Pi 2012 03 imprimisPi 2012 03 imprimis
Pi 2012 03 imprimis
 
Oral portfolios
Oral portfoliosOral portfolios
Oral portfolios
 
Looking for sources
Looking for sourcesLooking for sources
Looking for sources
 
Pi 2011 07 imprimis
Pi 2011 07 imprimisPi 2011 07 imprimis
Pi 2011 07 imprimis
 
Pi 2011 11 imprimis
Pi 2011 11 imprimisPi 2011 11 imprimis
Pi 2011 11 imprimis
 
Chapter 1-indian-ethos
Chapter 1-indian-ethosChapter 1-indian-ethos
Chapter 1-indian-ethos
 
Pi 2012 12-18-presidents-essay the march of freedom
Pi 2012 12-18-presidents-essay the march of freedomPi 2012 12-18-presidents-essay the march of freedom
Pi 2012 12-18-presidents-essay the march of freedom
 
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
 
Why network why 4 lifeyes 3
Why network why 4 lifeyes 3Why network why 4 lifeyes 3
Why network why 4 lifeyes 3
 
ตัวอย่างผู้ใช้ผลิตภัณฑ์ต่างประเทศ
ตัวอย่างผู้ใช้ผลิตภัณฑ์ต่างประเทศตัวอย่างผู้ใช้ผลิตภัณฑ์ต่างประเทศ
ตัวอย่างผู้ใช้ผลิตภัณฑ์ต่างประเทศ
 
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
Why network why 4 lifeyes 2
 
5อ 1พ เพื่อสุขภาพที่ดีและมีอายุยืนยาว
5อ 1พ เพื่อสุขภาพที่ดีและมีอายุยืนยาว5อ 1พ เพื่อสุขภาพที่ดีและมีอายุยืนยาว
5อ 1พ เพื่อสุขภาพที่ดีและมีอายุยืนยาว
 

Similar to Pi 2011 05 imprimis

Research Proposal
Research ProposalResearch Proposal
Research Proposal
Sean Walsh
 
Second New Deal
Second New DealSecond New Deal
Second New Deal
juliahornaday
 
Pocket review of organized labor in america
Pocket review of organized labor in americaPocket review of organized labor in america
Pocket review of organized labor in america
RA Harris
 
AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL
AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALLAN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL
AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL
SOA Watch Labor Caucas: SE MI
 
The new deal
The new dealThe new deal
The new deal
wtidwell
 
The Los Angeles Times bombing
The Los Angeles Times bombingThe Los Angeles Times bombing
The Los Angeles Times bombing
Nick Elle
 
Redcio revision 2012
Redcio revision 2012Redcio revision 2012
Redcio revision 2012
Mike Olszanski
 
Limits Of Progressivism
Limits Of ProgressivismLimits Of Progressivism
Limits Of Progressivism
zmiers
 
2008vus8d progressives
2008vus8d progressives2008vus8d progressives
2008vus8d progressives
k0socha
 
L580 aifld paper aflcia
L580 aifld paper aflciaL580 aifld paper aflcia
L580 aifld paper aflcia
Mike Olszanski
 
WHY IT MATTEREDThe 1935 Wagner Act was one of the most impor.docx
WHY IT MATTEREDThe 1935 Wagner Act was one of the most impor.docxWHY IT MATTEREDThe 1935 Wagner Act was one of the most impor.docx
WHY IT MATTEREDThe 1935 Wagner Act was one of the most impor.docx
alanfhall8953
 
Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining Private and Public Sectors 10th Edi...
Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining Private and Public Sectors 10th Edi...Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining Private and Public Sectors 10th Edi...
Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining Private and Public Sectors 10th Edi...
gosexeruzy
 
Hogan's History- Rise of Labor Unions
Hogan's History- Rise of Labor Unions Hogan's History- Rise of Labor Unions
Hogan's History- Rise of Labor Unions
William Hogan
 
Top of FormExpected OutcomesTo understand the political ec.docx
Top of FormExpected OutcomesTo understand the political ec.docxTop of FormExpected OutcomesTo understand the political ec.docx
Top of FormExpected OutcomesTo understand the political ec.docx
edwardmarivel
 
Pi 2011 09 imprimis
Pi 2011 09 imprimisPi 2011 09 imprimis
Pi 2011 09 imprimis
Michael LaPlante
 
Red CIO 3 16
Red CIO 3 16Red CIO 3 16
Red CIO 3 16
Mike Olszanski
 
A.p. ch 34 pt. 3
A.p. ch 34 pt. 3A.p. ch 34 pt. 3
A.p. ch 34 pt. 3
tobin15
 
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecturePageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
Deborah Robbins
 
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
Pageant 13th  Ch 33 lecturePageant 13th  Ch 33 lecture
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
Deborah Robbins
 
Top of FormLesson 7 Public PolicyExpected Outcomes.docx
Top of FormLesson 7 Public PolicyExpected Outcomes.docxTop of FormLesson 7 Public PolicyExpected Outcomes.docx
Top of FormLesson 7 Public PolicyExpected Outcomes.docx
edwardmarivel
 

Similar to Pi 2011 05 imprimis (20)

Research Proposal
Research ProposalResearch Proposal
Research Proposal
 
Second New Deal
Second New DealSecond New Deal
Second New Deal
 
Pocket review of organized labor in america
Pocket review of organized labor in americaPocket review of organized labor in america
Pocket review of organized labor in america
 
AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL
AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALLAN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL
AN INJURY TO ONE IS AN INJURY TO ALL
 
The new deal
The new dealThe new deal
The new deal
 
The Los Angeles Times bombing
The Los Angeles Times bombingThe Los Angeles Times bombing
The Los Angeles Times bombing
 
Redcio revision 2012
Redcio revision 2012Redcio revision 2012
Redcio revision 2012
 
Limits Of Progressivism
Limits Of ProgressivismLimits Of Progressivism
Limits Of Progressivism
 
2008vus8d progressives
2008vus8d progressives2008vus8d progressives
2008vus8d progressives
 
L580 aifld paper aflcia
L580 aifld paper aflciaL580 aifld paper aflcia
L580 aifld paper aflcia
 
WHY IT MATTEREDThe 1935 Wagner Act was one of the most impor.docx
WHY IT MATTEREDThe 1935 Wagner Act was one of the most impor.docxWHY IT MATTEREDThe 1935 Wagner Act was one of the most impor.docx
WHY IT MATTEREDThe 1935 Wagner Act was one of the most impor.docx
 
Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining Private and Public Sectors 10th Edi...
Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining Private and Public Sectors 10th Edi...Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining Private and Public Sectors 10th Edi...
Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining Private and Public Sectors 10th Edi...
 
Hogan's History- Rise of Labor Unions
Hogan's History- Rise of Labor Unions Hogan's History- Rise of Labor Unions
Hogan's History- Rise of Labor Unions
 
Top of FormExpected OutcomesTo understand the political ec.docx
Top of FormExpected OutcomesTo understand the political ec.docxTop of FormExpected OutcomesTo understand the political ec.docx
Top of FormExpected OutcomesTo understand the political ec.docx
 
Pi 2011 09 imprimis
Pi 2011 09 imprimisPi 2011 09 imprimis
Pi 2011 09 imprimis
 
Red CIO 3 16
Red CIO 3 16Red CIO 3 16
Red CIO 3 16
 
A.p. ch 34 pt. 3
A.p. ch 34 pt. 3A.p. ch 34 pt. 3
A.p. ch 34 pt. 3
 
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecturePageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
 
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
Pageant 13th  Ch 33 lecturePageant 13th  Ch 33 lecture
Pageant 13th Ch 33 lecture
 
Top of FormLesson 7 Public PolicyExpected Outcomes.docx
Top of FormLesson 7 Public PolicyExpected Outcomes.docxTop of FormLesson 7 Public PolicyExpected Outcomes.docx
Top of FormLesson 7 Public PolicyExpected Outcomes.docx
 

Pi 2011 05 imprimis

  • 1. A Publication of Hillsdale College Imprimis Over 1,900,000 Reader s Monthly May/June 2011 • Volume 40, Number 5/6 The Right to Work: A Fundamental Freedom Mark Mix President, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation Mark Mix is president of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, as well as of the National Right to Work Committee, a 2.2 million member public policy organization. He holds a B.A. in finance from James Madison University and an associate’s degree in marketing from the State University of New York. His writings have appeared in such newspapers and magazines as the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Times, the Detroit Free Press, the San Antonio Express- News, the Orange County Register and National Review. The following is adapted from a lecture delivered at Hillsdale College on January 31, 2011, during a conference co-sponsored by the Center for Constructive Alternatives and the Ludwig von Mises Lecture Series. Boeing is a great American company. Recently it has built a second production line—its other is in Washington State—in South Carolina for its 787 Dreamliner airplane, creating 1,000 jobs there so far. Who knows what factors led to its decision to do this? As with all such business decisions, there were many. But the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)—a five-member agency created in 1935 by the Wagner Act (about which I will speak momentarily)—has taken exception to this decision, ultimately based on the fact that South Carolina is a right-to-work state. That is, South Carolina, like 21 other states today, protects a worker’s right not only to join a union, but also to make the choice not to join or financially support a union. Washington State does not. The general counsel of the NLRB, on behalf of the International Association of Machinists union, has issued a complaint against Boeing, which, if successful, would require it to move its South Carolina operation back to Washington State. This would represent an unprecedented act of intervention by the federal government that appears, on its face, un-American. But it is an act long in the making, and boils down to a fundamental misunderstanding of freedom. Where does this story begin? hill sdale.edu
  • 2. Hillsdale College: Pursuing Truth • Defending Libert y since 1844 The Wagner Act and clear principle that the freedom to associ- Taft-Hartley ate necessarily includes the freedom not to associate. In other words, the Wagner In 1935, Congress passed and President Act didn’t protect the freedom of work- Franklin Roosevelt signed into law the ers because it didn’t allow for them to National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), decide against union membership. To commonly referred to as the Wagner be sure, the Wagner Act left states the Act after its Senate sponsor, New York prerogative to protect employees from Democrat Robert Wagner. Section 7 of compulsory union membership. But fed- the Wagner Act states: eral law was decidedly one-sided: Firing or refusing to hire a worker because he Employees shall have the right to or she had joined a union was a federal self-organization, to form, join, crime, whereas firing or refusing to hire or assist labor organizations, to a worker for not joining a union with bargain collectively through rep- “exclusive” bargaining privileges was resentatives of their own choosing, federally protected. The National Labor and to engage in other concerted Relations Board was created by the activities for the purpose of collec- Wagner Act to enforce these policies. tive bargaining or other mutual aid During World War II, FDR’s War or protection. Labor Board aggressively promoted com- pulsory union membership. By the end Union officials such as William of the war, the vast majority of unionized Green, president of the American workers in America were covered by con- Federation of Labor (AFL), and John tracts requiring them to belong to a union L. Lewis, prin- in order to keep their cipal founder −´ jobs. But Americans Imprimis (im-pri-mis), of the Congress [Latin]: in the first place were coming to see of Industrial compulsory union Editor Organizations (CIO), Douglas A. Jeffrey membership—euphe- hailed this legisla- Deputy Editor mistically referred to tion at the time as Timothy W. Caspar as “union security”—as Copy Editors the “Magna Carta Emily Thiessen a violation of the free- of Labor.” But in Monica VanDerWeide dom of association. fact it was far from a Art Director Angela Lashaway Furthermore, the non- charter of liberty for Marketing Director chalance with which working Americans. Fred Hadra union bosses like John Section 8(3) of the Production Manager Lucinda Grimm L. Lewis paralyzed Wagner Act allowed Circulation Manager the economy by call- for “agreements” Wanda Oxenger ing employees out on between employ- Staff Assistants Robin Curtis strike in 1946 hard- ers and officers of Kim Ellsworth ened public support Kathy Smith a union requiring Mary Jo Von Ewegen for the right to work as union membership opposed to compulsory “as a condition of Copyright © 2011 Hillsdale College unionism. As Gilbert The opinions expressed in Imprimis are not employment” if the necessarily the views of Hillsdale College. J. Gall, a staunch pro- union was certi- Permission to reprint in whole or in part is ponent of the latter, hereby granted, provided the following credit fied or recognized line is used: “Reprinted by permission from acknowledged in a as the employees’ Imprimis, a publication of Hillsdale College.” monograph chroni- Subscription free upon request. “exclusive” bargain- cling legislative battles ISSN 0277-8432 ing agent on matters Imprimis trademark registered in U.S. over this issue from of pay, benefits, and Patent and Trademark Office #1563325. the 1940s on, “the huge work rules. On its post-war strike wave face, this violates the and other problems of 2
  • 3. May/June 2011 • Volume 40, Number 5/6 hillsdale.edu reconversion gave an added impetus to right-to-work proposals.” An audio version of Imprimis When dozens of senators and con- is available online at gressmen who backed compulsory hillsdale.edu/imprimis unionism were ousted in the 1946 elec- tion, the new Republican leaders of Congress had a clear opportunity to But they could still be forced to join, on curb the legal power of union bosses to threat of being fired, within a few weeks force workers to join unions. Instead, after starting on the job. they opted for a compromise that they thought would have enough congres- sional support to override a presidential Boeing’s Interest, veto by President Truman. Thus Section and Ours 7 of the revised National Labor Relations Act of 1947—commonly referred to as It cannot be overemphasized that com- the Taft-Hartley Act—only appears at pulsory unionism violates the first princi- first to represent an improvement over ple of the original labor union movement Section 7 of the Wagner Act. It begins: in America. Samuel Gompers, founder and first president of the AFL, wrote Employees shall have the right to that the labor movement was “based self-organization, to form, join, upon the recognition of the sovereignty or assist labor organizations, to of the worker.” Officers of the AFL, he bargain collectively through rep- explained in the American Federationist, resentatives of their own choosing, can “suggest” or “recommend,” but they and to engage in other concerted “can not command one man in America activities for the purpose of collec- to do anything.” He continued: “Under tive bargaining or other mutual aid no circumstances can they say, ‘you or protection, and shall also have must do so and so,’ or, ‘you must desist the right to refrain from any and all from doing so and so.’” In a series of such activities. . . . Federationist editorials published during World War I, Gompers opposed various Had this sentence ended there, government mandate measures being forced union membership would have considered in the capitals of industrial been prohibited, and at the same time states like Massachusetts and New York voluntary union membership would have that would have mandated certain provi- remained protected. Unfortunately, the sions for manual laborers and other select sentence continued: groups of workers: …except to the extent that such The workers of America adhere to right may be affected by an agree- voluntary institutions in preference ment requiring membership in a to compulsory systems which are labor organization as a condition of held to be not only impractical but a employment as authorized in sec- menace to their rights, welfare and tion 158(a)(3) of this title. their liberty. This qualification, placing federal policy firmly on the side of compulsory This argument applies as much to union membership, left workers little compulsory unionism—or “union better off than they were under the security”—as to the opposite idea that Wagner Act. Elsewhere, Taft-Hartley unions should be prohibited. And in did, for the most part, prohibit “closed a December 1918 address before the shop” arrangements that forced work- Council on Foreign Relations, Gompers ers to join a union before being hired. made this point explicitly: 3
  • 4. buZiOs | ilha grande | paraty | santOs/sÃO paulO i ta J a i | p u n ta d e l e s t e | M O n t e v i d e O Hillsdale College Cruise Rio De Janeiro to Buenos Aires February 20 - March 3, 2012 Aboard the Crystal Symphony Onboard Speakers Bing West Author, The Wrong War: Grit, Strategy, and the Way Out of Afghanistan Norman Podhoretz Author, World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism Midge Decter Author and Editor Larry P. Arnn President, Hillsdale College ADDITIONAL SPEAKERS TO BE ANNOUNCED! spaCe is liMited! book your cabin by June 30 For more information or to reserve your cabin, and receive additional savings! please call Moneyshow at (800) 797-9519. There may be here and there a worker Employees International Union, was even who for certain reasons unexplain- more blunt. When it comes to union able to us does not join a union of organizing campaigns, he told the Wall labor. This is his right no matter how Street Journal, “We don’t do elections.” morally wrong he may be. It is his Under a decades-old political com- legal right and no one can dare ques- promise, federal labor policies promoting tion his exercise of that legal right. compulsory unionism persist side by side with the ability of states to curb such com- Compare Gompers’s traditional pulsion with right-to-work laws. So far, as American view of freedom to the con- I said, 22 states have done so. And when temptuous view toward workers of labor we compare and contrast the economic leaders today. Here is United Food and performance in these 22 states against Commercial Workers union strategist Joe the others, we find interesting things. Crump advising union organizers in a For example, from 1999 to 2009 (the last 1991 trade journal article: “Employees are such year for which data are available), the complex and unpredictable. Employers aggregate real all-industry GDP of the 22 are simple and predictable. Organize right-to-work states grew by 24.2 percent, employers, not employees.” And in nearly 40 percent more than the gain reg- 2005, Mike Fishman, head of the Service istered by the other 28 states as a group. 4
  • 5. MAY/JUNE 2011 • VOLUME 40, NUMBER 5/6 hillsdale.edu Even more dramatic is the contrast if ago: “We have the ability, in a sense, to we look at personal income growth. From elect our own boss.” 2000 to 2010, real personal incomes grew How this works is simple, and explains by an average of 24.3 percent in the 22 the inordinate power of union officials right-to-work states, more than double in so many states that have not adopted the rate for the other 28 as a group. But right-to-work laws. Union officials funnel the strongest indicator is the migration a huge portion of the compulsory dues and of young adults. In 2009, there were 20 fees they collect into efforts to influence the percent more 25- to 34-year-olds in right- outcomes of elections. In return, elected to-work states than in 1999. In the com- officials are afraid to anger them even in pulsory union states, the increase was only the face of financial crisis. This explains 3.3 percent—barely one-sixth as much. why states with the heaviest tax burdens In this context, the decision by Boeing and the greatest long-term fiscal imbal- to open a plant in South Carolina may be ances (in many cases due to bloated public not only in its own best interest, but in employee pension funds) are those with ours as well. So in whose interest is the the most unionized government work- National Labor Relations Board acting? forces. California, Illinois, Massachusetts, And more importantly, with a view to Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, what understanding of freedom? Ohio and Wisconsin represent the worst default risks among the 50 states. In 2010, Public Sector an average of 59.2 percent of the public employees in these nine worst default-risk Unionism states were unionized, 19.2 percentage points higher than the national average As more and more workers and businesses of 40 percent. All of these states except have obtained refuge from compulsory Nevada authorize compulsory union dues unionism in right-to-work states in recent and fees in the public sector. decades, the rationality of the free market has been showing itself. But the public sec- *** tor is another and a grimmer story. Fortunately, there are signs that The National Labor Relations Act taxpayers are recognizing the negative affects only private-sector workers. Since consequences of compulsory unionism the 1960s, however, 21 states have enacted in the public sector. Just this March, leg- laws authorizing the collection of forced islatures in Wisconsin and Ohio revoked union dues from at least some state and compulsory powers of government union local public employees. More than a dozen bosses, and similar efforts are underway additional states have granted union in several other states. Furthermore, officials the monopoly power to speak the NLRB’s blatantly political and un- for all government workers whether they constitutional power play with regard to consent to this or not. Thus today, govern- Boeing’s South Carolina production line ment workers are more than five times is sure to strike fair-minded Americans as likely to be unionized as private sector as beyond the pale. Now more than ever, workers. This represents a great danger it is time to push home the point that for taxpayers and all American work- consumers of govern- ers in all 50 states ment services. For as should be granted Victor Gotbaum, head the full freedom of of the Manhattan- association—which did yOu knOW? based District 37 of the includes the freedom two hundr e d eight y-si x s tudent s American Federation graduated from hillsdale college on not to associate—in of State, County and May 14. author and journalist Mark the area of union helprin delivered the commencement Municipal Employees address, entitled “churchill and the membership. I union, said 36 years Presidency.” this address can be viewed online at hillsdale.edu/helprin. 5