Phuljan nessa hc order
•
0 likes•350 views
This document is a court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Phuljan Nessa challenging a Foreigners' Tribunal order declaring her to be a foreigner after 1971. The court heard arguments from lawyers for both sides. It noted that despite being declared a foreigner, Phuljan Nessa's name has been entered in the National Register of Citizens. As such, the court impleaded the State Coordinator of Assam NRC as an additional respondent. It directed service of documents on the new respondent and listed the case for admission on a future date to obtain written instructions on this important issue that emerged.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
Shaikh farid notice issued order
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking compensation from the state government respondents for the death of the minor son/brother of the petitioners, who died due to police firing on September 23, 2021 at their village in Darrang District, Assam. The court issued notice to the respondent state government officials, returnable by December 1, 2021. The petitioners were also directed to serve copies of the writ petition and annexures to the state government advocate by October 26, 2021. The case was listed for further proceedings.
Maynal haque order
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the 2 page court document:
The document is from the Gauhati High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh regarding a writ petition filed by Makbul Ali and Ainuddin against the State of Assam and its Commissioner and Secretary of Home Affairs, Deputy Commissioner of Darrang, Director General of Police of Assam, and Superintendent of Police of Darrang. The matter was listed along with another writ petition for hearing on December 1, 2021 before the Hon'ble Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak as prayed for by the petitioners.
20210914 gauhati hc on eviction from lumding reserve forest
This document is a court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a PIL filed to address the issue of encroachment of forest land in the Lumding Reserve Forest in Assam. The court order acknowledges the large area of over 1.1 hectares that has been encroached upon. The state government has submitted an affidavit and action plan to remove the encroachments in a phased manner from October 2021 to February 2022. The court has directed the state authorities to submit a progress update on the eviction actions taken in the first week of November 2021 as per the submitted plan.
Ippta’s “knowledge trip” to china
This document is a registration form for travel to China as a delegate of the IPPTA (Indian Paper, Pulp and Paper Technical Association). It requests information such as name, IPPTA membership number, designation, employer, contact details, passport information, travel dates, dietary preferences, and emergency contact. It outlines the costs of Rs. 47,000 for the trip including a visit to the Great Wall of China, or Rs. 40,000 without the visit. It notes the registration amount may be forfeited if full payment is not made within 7 days of approval. The applicant agrees IPPTA will not be responsible for any accidents or issues during travel.
Klc utilisation of puramboke vested in panchayath by the panchayath - restr...
Klc utilisation of puramboke vested in panchayath by the panchayath - restr...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
ജഡ്ജ്മെന്റ് KLC Act Revenue ഉദ്യോഗസ്ഥർ ശ്രദ്ധിക്കേണ്ട വളരെ ശ്രദ്ധേയമായ ഒരു ഹൈ കോടതി വിധി. Revenue രേഖകളിൽ(BTR) പുറമ്പോക്ക് വഴിയായി രേഖപ്പെടുത്തിയിട്ടുള്ള സ്ഥലത്ത് ഒരു കുടുംബം അവരുടെ സ്വന്തമായ ഭൂമിയും കഴിഞ്ഞ് ടി puramobke സ്ഥലവും കൂടി കയ്യേറി വീട് നിർമാണം നടത്തുന്നു. ജില്ലാ കളക്ടർക്ക് പരാതി ലഭിച്ചതിന്റെ അടിസ്ഥാനത്തിൽ കളക്ടർ തഹസിൽദാരോട് ടി കയ്യേറ്റം ഒഴിപ്പിക്കാൻ നിർദേശം നൽകുന്നു. തഹസിൽദാർ KLC നിയമ പ്രകാരമുള്ള നോട്ടീസുകൾ നൽകി കയ്യേറ്റം ഒഴിപ്പിച്ചു. തുടർന്ന് ടി പുറമ്പോക്ക് വഴി ഒരാൾക്ക് മാത്രം ഉപയോഗയ്ക്കുന്നതിനായി നൽകാൻ കഴിയില്ലെന്നും അവർക്ക് മറ്റ് വഴി ഉണ്ടെന്നും ഉള്ള തിനാൽ പഞ്ചായത്ത് കമ്മിറ്റി ടി പുറമ്പോക് വഴിയിൽ അംഗനവാടി തുടങ്ങുന്നതിനു തീരുമാനിച്ചതായി തഹസിൽദാരെ അറിയിക്കുന്നു.എന്നാൽ തഹസിൽദാർ ടി പുറമ്പോക്ക് സ്ഥലo ആയത് പോലെ സംരെക്ഷിക്കൻ അല്ലാതെ പഞ്ചായത്തിന് സ്വന്തം നിലയിൽ മറ്റ് ആവശ്യങ്ങൾക് ഉപയോഗിക്കാൻ കഴിയില്ല എന്ന് പഞ്ചായത്തിനെ അറിയിക്കുകയും കളക്ടർക്ക് റിപ്പോർട്ട് നൽകുകയും ചെയ്തു. തുടർന്ന് ഒഴിപ്പിക്കുന്നതിനു നിർദ്ദേശം നൽകിയ കളക്ടർ മാറുകയും പുതിയതായി വന്ന കളക്ടർ പഞ്ചായത് കമ്മിറ്റിയുടെ തീരുമാനം അംഗീകരിച്ചു കൊടുക്കുകയും ചെയ്തു. ആയതിനെതിരെ ഹൈകോടതിയിൽ കേസ് ഫയൽ ചെയ്യുകയും puramboke വഴിയായി BTR ഉൾപ്പടെയുള്ള രേഖകളിൽ ഉള്ള സ്ഥലം പഞ്ചായത്തിന് അത് പോലെ സംരക്ഷിക്കാം എന്നല്ലാതെ മറ്റ് പ്രവർത്തികൾ ചെയ്യാൻ അധികാരം ഇല്ലെന്നും, പഞ്ചായത്തിന് അനുമതി നൽകിയ Trivandrum collectorude നടപടി നിയമ ലംഘനം ആണെന്നും നിരീക്ഷിച്ച കോടതി കളക്ടറുടെ ഉത്തരവ് quash ചെയ്ത് കളയുകയും, തഹസിൽദാർ ചെയ്ത നടപടി ശെരി വെയ്ക്കുകയും ചെയ്തു.
പഞ്ചായത്ത്രാജ്, മുൻസിപ്പൽ, corporation തുടങ്ങിയ ആക്ടുകൾ നിലവിൽ വന്നതിനു ശേഷം കുളം, തോട്, റോഡ് തുടങ്ങിയവ അതത് local self government ന് നൽകിയത് പോലെ സംരക്ഷിക്കാം എന്നല്ലാതെ യാതൊരു വിധ രൂപ ഭേദമോ, നിർമാണ പ്രവർത്തനങ്ങളോ Government ന്റെ prior permission ഇല്ലാതെ ചെയ്യാൻ പാടില്ല എന്ന് ടി നിയമങ്ങളിൽ വ്യക്തമാക്കിയിട്ടുണ്ട്.
Vesting with the Panchayat is only
for the purpose of management👆👆👆 uploaded for the Kerala land revenue officers and citizens of kerala by James Joseph Adhikaram, Retd. Deputy Collector, Kottayam, Kerala.Mob- 9447464502. https://www.facebook.com/keralalawsonland/Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil 9447464502
it is ordered in the interest of justice that in
case the subject properties obtained by the petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2 registered sale deeds have already been mutated in favour of the petitioner and the land tax has already been accepted from him as per Ext.P3, then certainly he is the registered
landholder of the subject properties as envisaged in Section 3(3)(d) of the Kerala Land Tax Act,1961, in which case going by the cumulative impact mandate of Section 5 (2) r/w Section 3(3)(d) of
the Kerala Land Tax Act, the respondents are obliged to accept
basic land tax from the petitioner as otherwise it would amount to abdication and dereliction of duties. In that view of the matter, it is ordered that the 1st respondent Village Officer will immediately consider the request for acceptance of basic land tax from the petitioner and will grant the said request without any further delay and will issue receipts in that regard immediately.
WPC 11567/19 - Mutation of surrendered land - puramboke ordered - james adhik...
WPC 11567/19 - Mutation of surrendered land - puramboke ordered - james adhik...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 11567/19 - Mutation of surrendered land - puramboke ordered - james adhikaram your land consultant 9447464502 WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil As already noted hereinabove, the 1st respondent Tahsildar
as the authority concerned with grant of mutation and Transfer of
Registry, has no power to examine such vexed issues of title and
therefore he has unnecessarily strayed himself into areas which are
totally irrelevant and not germane for the purpose of the enquiry for
exercising the powers conferred on him. It has been held by this
Court in a catena of decisions as in SAINUDHEEN Vs. STATE OF
KERALA [2013 (1) KHC 437 , para 13] that the Tahsildar, as the
mutation granting authority, cannot decide on the validity of the
documents, and the title of the previous owner and that Rule 16 of the
Transfer of Registry Rules has made the said position abundantly
clear. Rule 16 of the Transfer of Registry Rules mandates that “the
summary, enquiry and decision thereon is only an arrangement for
fiscal purposes, and it does not affect the title of any person in
respect of the lands covered with the decisions in Transfer of
Registry cases and the question of legal right is always subject to
adjudication by civil courts and pattas could be revised from time to
time in accordance with such judicial decisions. It has been held by
the Apex Court and various High Courts in various decisions as in
SURNEY Vs INDER KAUR [AIR 1996 SC 2823] that mutation of
W.P.(C).39769/18 - : 18 :-
property in the revenue records does not create or extinguish title,
nor has it any presumptive value on title and it only enables the
person in whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue
in question. Therefore in cases like the present one, where the
registered land holder concerned has transferred the property, then
the transferees/assignees will stand in the shoe of the land holder
and by the cumulative impact of Sec. 5(2) and Sec. 3(3) (d), the
competent revenue officials are under the bounden and statutory
obligation to accept basic land tax from them. Otherwise it will
amount to nothing but abdication to statutory obligations and duties
of such competent revenue officials, which directly leads to loss of
revenue.
Recommended
Shaikh farid notice issued order
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking compensation from the state government respondents for the death of the minor son/brother of the petitioners, who died due to police firing on September 23, 2021 at their village in Darrang District, Assam. The court issued notice to the respondent state government officials, returnable by December 1, 2021. The petitioners were also directed to serve copies of the writ petition and annexures to the state government advocate by October 26, 2021. The case was listed for further proceedings.
Maynal haque order
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the 2 page court document:
The document is from the Gauhati High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh regarding a writ petition filed by Makbul Ali and Ainuddin against the State of Assam and its Commissioner and Secretary of Home Affairs, Deputy Commissioner of Darrang, Director General of Police of Assam, and Superintendent of Police of Darrang. The matter was listed along with another writ petition for hearing on December 1, 2021 before the Hon'ble Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak as prayed for by the petitioners.
20210914 gauhati hc on eviction from lumding reserve forest
This document is a court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a PIL filed to address the issue of encroachment of forest land in the Lumding Reserve Forest in Assam. The court order acknowledges the large area of over 1.1 hectares that has been encroached upon. The state government has submitted an affidavit and action plan to remove the encroachments in a phased manner from October 2021 to February 2022. The court has directed the state authorities to submit a progress update on the eviction actions taken in the first week of November 2021 as per the submitted plan.
Ippta’s “knowledge trip” to china
This document is a registration form for travel to China as a delegate of the IPPTA (Indian Paper, Pulp and Paper Technical Association). It requests information such as name, IPPTA membership number, designation, employer, contact details, passport information, travel dates, dietary preferences, and emergency contact. It outlines the costs of Rs. 47,000 for the trip including a visit to the Great Wall of China, or Rs. 40,000 without the visit. It notes the registration amount may be forfeited if full payment is not made within 7 days of approval. The applicant agrees IPPTA will not be responsible for any accidents or issues during travel.
Klc utilisation of puramboke vested in panchayath by the panchayath - restr...
Klc utilisation of puramboke vested in panchayath by the panchayath - restr...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
ജഡ്ജ്മെന്റ് KLC Act Revenue ഉദ്യോഗസ്ഥർ ശ്രദ്ധിക്കേണ്ട വളരെ ശ്രദ്ധേയമായ ഒരു ഹൈ കോടതി വിധി. Revenue രേഖകളിൽ(BTR) പുറമ്പോക്ക് വഴിയായി രേഖപ്പെടുത്തിയിട്ടുള്ള സ്ഥലത്ത് ഒരു കുടുംബം അവരുടെ സ്വന്തമായ ഭൂമിയും കഴിഞ്ഞ് ടി puramobke സ്ഥലവും കൂടി കയ്യേറി വീട് നിർമാണം നടത്തുന്നു. ജില്ലാ കളക്ടർക്ക് പരാതി ലഭിച്ചതിന്റെ അടിസ്ഥാനത്തിൽ കളക്ടർ തഹസിൽദാരോട് ടി കയ്യേറ്റം ഒഴിപ്പിക്കാൻ നിർദേശം നൽകുന്നു. തഹസിൽദാർ KLC നിയമ പ്രകാരമുള്ള നോട്ടീസുകൾ നൽകി കയ്യേറ്റം ഒഴിപ്പിച്ചു. തുടർന്ന് ടി പുറമ്പോക്ക് വഴി ഒരാൾക്ക് മാത്രം ഉപയോഗയ്ക്കുന്നതിനായി നൽകാൻ കഴിയില്ലെന്നും അവർക്ക് മറ്റ് വഴി ഉണ്ടെന്നും ഉള്ള തിനാൽ പഞ്ചായത്ത് കമ്മിറ്റി ടി പുറമ്പോക് വഴിയിൽ അംഗനവാടി തുടങ്ങുന്നതിനു തീരുമാനിച്ചതായി തഹസിൽദാരെ അറിയിക്കുന്നു.എന്നാൽ തഹസിൽദാർ ടി പുറമ്പോക്ക് സ്ഥലo ആയത് പോലെ സംരെക്ഷിക്കൻ അല്ലാതെ പഞ്ചായത്തിന് സ്വന്തം നിലയിൽ മറ്റ് ആവശ്യങ്ങൾക് ഉപയോഗിക്കാൻ കഴിയില്ല എന്ന് പഞ്ചായത്തിനെ അറിയിക്കുകയും കളക്ടർക്ക് റിപ്പോർട്ട് നൽകുകയും ചെയ്തു. തുടർന്ന് ഒഴിപ്പിക്കുന്നതിനു നിർദ്ദേശം നൽകിയ കളക്ടർ മാറുകയും പുതിയതായി വന്ന കളക്ടർ പഞ്ചായത് കമ്മിറ്റിയുടെ തീരുമാനം അംഗീകരിച്ചു കൊടുക്കുകയും ചെയ്തു. ആയതിനെതിരെ ഹൈകോടതിയിൽ കേസ് ഫയൽ ചെയ്യുകയും puramboke വഴിയായി BTR ഉൾപ്പടെയുള്ള രേഖകളിൽ ഉള്ള സ്ഥലം പഞ്ചായത്തിന് അത് പോലെ സംരക്ഷിക്കാം എന്നല്ലാതെ മറ്റ് പ്രവർത്തികൾ ചെയ്യാൻ അധികാരം ഇല്ലെന്നും, പഞ്ചായത്തിന് അനുമതി നൽകിയ Trivandrum collectorude നടപടി നിയമ ലംഘനം ആണെന്നും നിരീക്ഷിച്ച കോടതി കളക്ടറുടെ ഉത്തരവ് quash ചെയ്ത് കളയുകയും, തഹസിൽദാർ ചെയ്ത നടപടി ശെരി വെയ്ക്കുകയും ചെയ്തു.
പഞ്ചായത്ത്രാജ്, മുൻസിപ്പൽ, corporation തുടങ്ങിയ ആക്ടുകൾ നിലവിൽ വന്നതിനു ശേഷം കുളം, തോട്, റോഡ് തുടങ്ങിയവ അതത് local self government ന് നൽകിയത് പോലെ സംരക്ഷിക്കാം എന്നല്ലാതെ യാതൊരു വിധ രൂപ ഭേദമോ, നിർമാണ പ്രവർത്തനങ്ങളോ Government ന്റെ prior permission ഇല്ലാതെ ചെയ്യാൻ പാടില്ല എന്ന് ടി നിയമങ്ങളിൽ വ്യക്തമാക്കിയിട്ടുണ്ട്.
Vesting with the Panchayat is only
for the purpose of management👆👆👆 uploaded for the Kerala land revenue officers and citizens of kerala by James Joseph Adhikaram, Retd. Deputy Collector, Kottayam, Kerala.Mob- 9447464502. https://www.facebook.com/keralalawsonland/Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil 9447464502
it is ordered in the interest of justice that in
case the subject properties obtained by the petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2 registered sale deeds have already been mutated in favour of the petitioner and the land tax has already been accepted from him as per Ext.P3, then certainly he is the registered
landholder of the subject properties as envisaged in Section 3(3)(d) of the Kerala Land Tax Act,1961, in which case going by the cumulative impact mandate of Section 5 (2) r/w Section 3(3)(d) of
the Kerala Land Tax Act, the respondents are obliged to accept
basic land tax from the petitioner as otherwise it would amount to abdication and dereliction of duties. In that view of the matter, it is ordered that the 1st respondent Village Officer will immediately consider the request for acceptance of basic land tax from the petitioner and will grant the said request without any further delay and will issue receipts in that regard immediately.
WPC 11567/19 - Mutation of surrendered land - puramboke ordered - james adhik...
WPC 11567/19 - Mutation of surrendered land - puramboke ordered - james adhik...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 11567/19 - Mutation of surrendered land - puramboke ordered - james adhikaram your land consultant 9447464502 WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil As already noted hereinabove, the 1st respondent Tahsildar
as the authority concerned with grant of mutation and Transfer of
Registry, has no power to examine such vexed issues of title and
therefore he has unnecessarily strayed himself into areas which are
totally irrelevant and not germane for the purpose of the enquiry for
exercising the powers conferred on him. It has been held by this
Court in a catena of decisions as in SAINUDHEEN Vs. STATE OF
KERALA [2013 (1) KHC 437 , para 13] that the Tahsildar, as the
mutation granting authority, cannot decide on the validity of the
documents, and the title of the previous owner and that Rule 16 of the
Transfer of Registry Rules has made the said position abundantly
clear. Rule 16 of the Transfer of Registry Rules mandates that “the
summary, enquiry and decision thereon is only an arrangement for
fiscal purposes, and it does not affect the title of any person in
respect of the lands covered with the decisions in Transfer of
Registry cases and the question of legal right is always subject to
adjudication by civil courts and pattas could be revised from time to
time in accordance with such judicial decisions. It has been held by
the Apex Court and various High Courts in various decisions as in
SURNEY Vs INDER KAUR [AIR 1996 SC 2823] that mutation of
W.P.(C).39769/18 - : 18 :-
property in the revenue records does not create or extinguish title,
nor has it any presumptive value on title and it only enables the
person in whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue
in question. Therefore in cases like the present one, where the
registered land holder concerned has transferred the property, then
the transferees/assignees will stand in the shoe of the land holder
and by the cumulative impact of Sec. 5(2) and Sec. 3(3) (d), the
competent revenue officials are under the bounden and statutory
obligation to accept basic land tax from them. Otherwise it will
amount to nothing but abdication to statutory obligations and duties
of such competent revenue officials, which directly leads to loss of
revenue.
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Complaint to the Honble President of India against Supreme Court of India_04_...
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court of India regarding a property dispute in Bihar that was dismissed and directed to be filed in the Patna High Court instead. The petitioner believes this will have far-reaching negative consequences for public interest and senior citizens. They allege the retired Justice S B Sinha is conspiring to kill the petitioners and seize their property in Bihar, and that the petitioner's father was already killed in 2007 regarding this property dispute. The petitioner requests the Supreme Court invoke its powers to protect the petitioner's fundamental rights to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Kerala hc on sma
The petitioner sought permission for her marriage to be solemnized and registered digitally under the Special Marriage Act as she had to leave India urgently to start a postgraduate course in the UK. However, the Court dismissed the petition noting that the Act requires the physical presence of the parties and witnesses for solemnization and registration. It observed that the 30 day notice period and other procedures under the Act cannot be relaxed or conducted digitally as penal consequences are prescribed for non-compliance. Given an earlier ruling, the Court held that unless the Act is amended, marriage cannot be solemnized digitally or before the notice period expires.
8284 of 2019 gauhati hc
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a petition filed by Rahima Khatun challenging an ex-parte order from the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her an illegal migrant. The High Court remanded the matter back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration of Rahima Khatun's citizenship status, after hearing from her. It also directed Rahima Khatun to appear before the Superintendent of Police within 15 days to provide information and furnish a bail bond, and not leave the district without permission. The records were then remitted back to the Foreigners Tribunal for further proceedings.
Gauhati hc judgement july 15
The petitioner challenged an opinion by a Foreigners Tribunal that held she was a foreigner who entered India illegally after March 24, 1971. The High Court set aside the opinion and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal. The Court found that the Tribunal exceeded the scope of the reference made to it by the police, which was to determine if the petitioner entered between January 1, 1966 and March 25, 1971. The Tribunal instead ruled she entered after March 25, 1971. The High Court held this was impermissible and sent the matter back for the Tribunal to rule on the actual terms of the reference.
Kerala hc may 4
The petitioners are accused in a case registered for offenses including unlawful assembly and assaulting a public servant. The public servant was attending an inquiry regarding a complaint against him at the High Court. The petitioners, who are lawyers, allegedly formed an unlawful assembly at the High Court and assaulted the public servant. The court observed that the key ingredient for the offense of assaulting a public servant was not made out as the public servant was attending an inquiry and not discharging official duties. The court questioned why Section 353 IPC (assaulting a public servant) was included and opined it was to wrongly implicate the lawyers in a non-bailable offense. The bail application was allowed.
WPC 2424/2020 - Excess land can be mutated - James Adhikaram 9447464502
WPC 2424/2020 - Excess land can be mutated - James Adhikaram 9447464502Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 2424/2020 - Excess land can be mutated - James Adhikaram 9447464502Solve your land problems in Kerala - We provide Legal support, assistance and monitoring of your complaints in Bhoomi tharam mattom, pattayam , thandapper , pokkuvaravu , land tax , building tax , digital survey Raila Odinga Petition Determination
Here is the summarised ruling of Raila Odinga's presidential petition challenging the election of President Uhuru Kenyatta on August 8.
Chhattis garh hc marital rape order
The document summarizes a court case in India. It discusses the charges filed against three applicants - a husband (Applicant 1) and his brother and sister-in-law (Applicants 2 and 3). The complainant is the wife of Applicant 1. She alleged harassment and cruelty by the applicants after marriage, including demands for dowry. The court upheld the charge of cruelty/dowry demand against all three applicants under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. However, it removed the charges of rape and unnatural sex against the husband, citing exceptions for marital rape in Indian law. It said sexual acts between a husband and wife do not constitute rape or unnatural sex offenses. The charge of unnatural
Sonali order 2(1)
1. The court is following up on orders it previously passed on July 1st and August 27th directing state authorities in Jharkhand to comply with Supreme Court orders regarding treatment, aftercare, and rehabilitation of acid attack victims.
2. The Supreme Court had convened a meeting where it was decided that states must treat acid attack victims, involve private hospitals, not refuse treatment, provide first aid and further care, and take action against non-compliant hospitals.
3. The court is unhappy that Jharkhand authorities have not provided a concrete response or shown compliance with the Supreme Court orders, and warns that the Chief Secretary and other officials may have to appear in person at the next hearing if no affidavit
Jbm hh bulletin012214
This document provides announcements and information for the Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall community. It includes notices about upcoming events such as visits from Miss America and volunteers being sought for wreath clean-up. It also provides information about assistance programs for veterans, education workshops, and changes to parking lot access due to ceremonies. The document serves to keep the community informed of news and opportunities through a collection of short notices.
WPC 28115/2006 Pokkuvaravu of harrison plantation property allowed uploaded b...
WPC 28115/2006 Pokkuvaravu of harrison plantation property allowed uploaded b...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 28115/2006 Pokkuvaravu of harrison plantation property allowed uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathik 9447464502 From the judicial decisions of this court, enumerated in the forgoing paragraphs, it is clearly evident that despite attempting various litigations and raising varioius contentions challenging title of the 7th respondent company and the transfers made by them, the Government could not initiate any statutory proceedings under any of the relevant laws for recovery of the land or to get it established that Government holds title over the property. Legal precedents with respect to the Transfer of Registry Rules remains settled to the effect that, with respect to a transfer of title by consent of parties, mutation cannot be rejected. Further, it is evident that mutation effected will not affect the title or rights with respect to any property. Therefore, unless the Government could establish with concrete evidence based on materials that title of the property in question vests with the Government, they cannot be allowed to refuse or reject the request for mutation, based on transfer of title by consent. In both these cases the request for mutation is rejected on the basis that the Government have got a claim that the 7th respondent company and its transferees were not holding valid title. But such an allegation by itself is not sufficient to deny the mutation requested. This is especially because of the fact that the properties in question stands already mutated in the name of the 7th respondent company and its transferees, as per the revenue records. Unless and until the Government establishes through methods acceptable to law that the Government is title holder of the property and there is no absolute transfer of title by virtue of the documents relating to transaction of the properties, the denial of mutation cannot be justified and sustained. It is also not justifiable on the part of competent authorities to keep the matter indefinitely pending on the basis that an enquiry was ordered by the Government by constituting a `High Level Committee'. The Special Government Pleader is not in a position to point out that any proceedings under the Land Conservancy Act was initiated, despite liberty granted by this court.
19. Under the above mentioned circumstances, these writ petitions are allowedKerala hc marital rape judgement (1)
This judgment involves two related matrimonial appeals. The High Court of Kerala upheld the family court's judgment granting a divorce to the wife on the grounds of cruelty by the husband. The court found that the husband treated the wife as a source of money, constantly harassing her and her family for funds. He mismanaged his real estate business and spent money lavishly. He also physically and sexually abused the wife, even during her pregnancy. The husband further levelled false allegations of adultery against the wife. Taking all the circumstances into account, the High Court dismissed the husband's appeal and upheld the divorce.
Chandni v state of up
The petitioners Chandni and another have challenged an FIR registered under Sections 363, 366 IPC at Police Station Kamrauli, District Amethi. They have approached the court due to harassment by police after the invocation of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020. The petitioners married out of their own will three years ago and are living peacefully with their one and a half year old child. The court has granted the state a week to seek instructions and listed the matter thereafter, providing that till the next date of listing, the petitioners shall not be harassed by police based on the impugned FIR.
Application form
Pankaj Kanta has applied for a fresh normal Indian passport. He was born on June 5, 1991 in Piplah, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. He listed his father Gulab Singh Kanta and mother Barda Devi as references. The application has not been paid for yet and does not include appointment details. Instructions are provided regarding documents to bring, accompanying persons, reporting time, prohibited items, and balance payment.
Gauhati hc santosh das v uoi (1)
1. The petitioner sought to quash an order declaring him a foreigner who illegally entered India after 1971.
2. The Tribunal acknowledged the reference was made against the petitioner for illegally entering between 1966-1971, but declared him a post-1971 foreigner.
3. The Court agrees the petitioner failed to prove his citizenship, but finds the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by not confining its opinion to the terms of the reference between 1966-1971. The Court modifies the Tribunal's order and directs the petitioner be registered as a 1966-1971 foreigner.
CJP NHRC petition- sultanpur rape case
1. On September 10, 2019, locals in Baijapur village, Sultanpur district, Uttar Pradesh discovered the brutally mutilated body of a girl hanging from a tree. The body was completely naked and showed signs of severe injuries including a stick inserted in her private parts.
2. The police filed an FIR that contradicted eyewitness accounts and did not properly investigate the crime as a case of sexual assault and rape. They also delayed sending the body for autopsy and made false claims about the autopsy report.
3. Citizens for Justice and Peace has filed a complaint with the National Human Rights Commission seeking an inquiry into the mishandling of the case by the Sultanpur police and to ensure
Privacy act statement website
This document contains a recruiting duty volunteer statement. The volunteer provides their contact information and acknowledges that they will serve a minimum of 36 months of recruiting duty if selected. They understand a background investigation will be conducted and their spouse must also volunteer if married to another soldier. The volunteer has not previously been disapproved for recruiting duty.
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
20210409 guwahati hc bail to chenbhanu begum
This document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Chenbhanu Begum challenging a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner. The court issued notice to the respondents, accepted undertakings from their representatives, and ordered the petitioner to appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond so she is not arrested pending the petition's hearing. Her biometrics will also be captured, and she must seek permission to leave the district. The lower court records will be called for, and the matter will be listed after their receipt.
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
The petitioner challenged a second proceeding initiated against her by the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her a foreigner, despite an earlier tribunal opinion finding she was not a foreigner. The court allows the petition, setting aside the second opinion as violating the Supreme Court ruling that the principle of res judicata applies to Foreigners Tribunal proceedings. As the petitioner's identity was the same in both proceedings and the tribunal made no finding she was different than the earlier proceedee, the second proceeding against the same person cannot be sustained. The petitioner must be released if detained under the second, now set aside, opinion.
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
1) The document is 52 pages long and appears to be court documents from the Gauhati High Court pertaining to several writ petitions challenging aspects of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam.
2) It includes details of 14 different writ petitions, listing the petitioners and respondents in each case.
3) The petitioners seem to be Assamese residents who did not make it to the final NRC list, challenging their exclusion, while the respondents include the Government of India, Government of Assam, election authorities and NRC authorities.
More Related Content
What's hot
Gauhati hc order july 20
1) The petitioner challenged a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner.
2) The Court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration, noting communication issues with the petitioner's counsel resulted in her missing hearings.
3) The Court will allow the petitioner to appear before the Tribunal again to prove her citizenship, as this is an important right that should be decided on the merits rather than by default.
4) The impugned Foreigners Tribunal order declaring the petitioner a foreigner is set aside, and she must appear before the Tribunal within one month to prove she is an Indian citizen.
Complaint to the Honble President of India against Supreme Court of India_04_...
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court of India regarding a property dispute in Bihar that was dismissed and directed to be filed in the Patna High Court instead. The petitioner believes this will have far-reaching negative consequences for public interest and senior citizens. They allege the retired Justice S B Sinha is conspiring to kill the petitioners and seize their property in Bihar, and that the petitioner's father was already killed in 2007 regarding this property dispute. The petitioner requests the Supreme Court invoke its powers to protect the petitioner's fundamental rights to life under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
Kerala hc on sma
The petitioner sought permission for her marriage to be solemnized and registered digitally under the Special Marriage Act as she had to leave India urgently to start a postgraduate course in the UK. However, the Court dismissed the petition noting that the Act requires the physical presence of the parties and witnesses for solemnization and registration. It observed that the 30 day notice period and other procedures under the Act cannot be relaxed or conducted digitally as penal consequences are prescribed for non-compliance. Given an earlier ruling, the Court held that unless the Act is amended, marriage cannot be solemnized digitally or before the notice period expires.
8284 of 2019 gauhati hc
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a petition filed by Rahima Khatun challenging an ex-parte order from the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her an illegal migrant. The High Court remanded the matter back to the Foreigners Tribunal for reconsideration of Rahima Khatun's citizenship status, after hearing from her. It also directed Rahima Khatun to appear before the Superintendent of Police within 15 days to provide information and furnish a bail bond, and not leave the district without permission. The records were then remitted back to the Foreigners Tribunal for further proceedings.
Gauhati hc judgement july 15
The petitioner challenged an opinion by a Foreigners Tribunal that held she was a foreigner who entered India illegally after March 24, 1971. The High Court set aside the opinion and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal. The Court found that the Tribunal exceeded the scope of the reference made to it by the police, which was to determine if the petitioner entered between January 1, 1966 and March 25, 1971. The Tribunal instead ruled she entered after March 25, 1971. The High Court held this was impermissible and sent the matter back for the Tribunal to rule on the actual terms of the reference.
Kerala hc may 4
The petitioners are accused in a case registered for offenses including unlawful assembly and assaulting a public servant. The public servant was attending an inquiry regarding a complaint against him at the High Court. The petitioners, who are lawyers, allegedly formed an unlawful assembly at the High Court and assaulted the public servant. The court observed that the key ingredient for the offense of assaulting a public servant was not made out as the public servant was attending an inquiry and not discharging official duties. The court questioned why Section 353 IPC (assaulting a public servant) was included and opined it was to wrongly implicate the lawyers in a non-bailable offense. The bail application was allowed.
WPC 2424/2020 - Excess land can be mutated - James Adhikaram 9447464502
WPC 2424/2020 - Excess land can be mutated - James Adhikaram 9447464502Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 2424/2020 - Excess land can be mutated - James Adhikaram 9447464502Solve your land problems in Kerala - We provide Legal support, assistance and monitoring of your complaints in Bhoomi tharam mattom, pattayam , thandapper , pokkuvaravu , land tax , building tax , digital survey Raila Odinga Petition Determination
Here is the summarised ruling of Raila Odinga's presidential petition challenging the election of President Uhuru Kenyatta on August 8.
Chhattis garh hc marital rape order
The document summarizes a court case in India. It discusses the charges filed against three applicants - a husband (Applicant 1) and his brother and sister-in-law (Applicants 2 and 3). The complainant is the wife of Applicant 1. She alleged harassment and cruelty by the applicants after marriage, including demands for dowry. The court upheld the charge of cruelty/dowry demand against all three applicants under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. However, it removed the charges of rape and unnatural sex against the husband, citing exceptions for marital rape in Indian law. It said sexual acts between a husband and wife do not constitute rape or unnatural sex offenses. The charge of unnatural
Sonali order 2(1)
1. The court is following up on orders it previously passed on July 1st and August 27th directing state authorities in Jharkhand to comply with Supreme Court orders regarding treatment, aftercare, and rehabilitation of acid attack victims.
2. The Supreme Court had convened a meeting where it was decided that states must treat acid attack victims, involve private hospitals, not refuse treatment, provide first aid and further care, and take action against non-compliant hospitals.
3. The court is unhappy that Jharkhand authorities have not provided a concrete response or shown compliance with the Supreme Court orders, and warns that the Chief Secretary and other officials may have to appear in person at the next hearing if no affidavit
Jbm hh bulletin012214
This document provides announcements and information for the Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall community. It includes notices about upcoming events such as visits from Miss America and volunteers being sought for wreath clean-up. It also provides information about assistance programs for veterans, education workshops, and changes to parking lot access due to ceremonies. The document serves to keep the community informed of news and opportunities through a collection of short notices.
WPC 28115/2006 Pokkuvaravu of harrison plantation property allowed uploaded b...
WPC 28115/2006 Pokkuvaravu of harrison plantation property allowed uploaded b...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 28115/2006 Pokkuvaravu of harrison plantation property allowed uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathik 9447464502 From the judicial decisions of this court, enumerated in the forgoing paragraphs, it is clearly evident that despite attempting various litigations and raising varioius contentions challenging title of the 7th respondent company and the transfers made by them, the Government could not initiate any statutory proceedings under any of the relevant laws for recovery of the land or to get it established that Government holds title over the property. Legal precedents with respect to the Transfer of Registry Rules remains settled to the effect that, with respect to a transfer of title by consent of parties, mutation cannot be rejected. Further, it is evident that mutation effected will not affect the title or rights with respect to any property. Therefore, unless the Government could establish with concrete evidence based on materials that title of the property in question vests with the Government, they cannot be allowed to refuse or reject the request for mutation, based on transfer of title by consent. In both these cases the request for mutation is rejected on the basis that the Government have got a claim that the 7th respondent company and its transferees were not holding valid title. But such an allegation by itself is not sufficient to deny the mutation requested. This is especially because of the fact that the properties in question stands already mutated in the name of the 7th respondent company and its transferees, as per the revenue records. Unless and until the Government establishes through methods acceptable to law that the Government is title holder of the property and there is no absolute transfer of title by virtue of the documents relating to transaction of the properties, the denial of mutation cannot be justified and sustained. It is also not justifiable on the part of competent authorities to keep the matter indefinitely pending on the basis that an enquiry was ordered by the Government by constituting a `High Level Committee'. The Special Government Pleader is not in a position to point out that any proceedings under the Land Conservancy Act was initiated, despite liberty granted by this court.
19. Under the above mentioned circumstances, these writ petitions are allowedKerala hc marital rape judgement (1)
This judgment involves two related matrimonial appeals. The High Court of Kerala upheld the family court's judgment granting a divorce to the wife on the grounds of cruelty by the husband. The court found that the husband treated the wife as a source of money, constantly harassing her and her family for funds. He mismanaged his real estate business and spent money lavishly. He also physically and sexually abused the wife, even during her pregnancy. The husband further levelled false allegations of adultery against the wife. Taking all the circumstances into account, the High Court dismissed the husband's appeal and upheld the divorce.
Chandni v state of up
The petitioners Chandni and another have challenged an FIR registered under Sections 363, 366 IPC at Police Station Kamrauli, District Amethi. They have approached the court due to harassment by police after the invocation of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Religious Conversion Ordinance, 2020. The petitioners married out of their own will three years ago and are living peacefully with their one and a half year old child. The court has granted the state a week to seek instructions and listed the matter thereafter, providing that till the next date of listing, the petitioners shall not be harassed by police based on the impugned FIR.
Application form
Pankaj Kanta has applied for a fresh normal Indian passport. He was born on June 5, 1991 in Piplah, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh. He listed his father Gulab Singh Kanta and mother Barda Devi as references. The application has not been paid for yet and does not include appointment details. Instructions are provided regarding documents to bring, accompanying persons, reporting time, prohibited items, and balance payment.
Gauhati hc santosh das v uoi (1)
1. The petitioner sought to quash an order declaring him a foreigner who illegally entered India after 1971.
2. The Tribunal acknowledged the reference was made against the petitioner for illegally entering between 1966-1971, but declared him a post-1971 foreigner.
3. The Court agrees the petitioner failed to prove his citizenship, but finds the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by not confining its opinion to the terms of the reference between 1966-1971. The Court modifies the Tribunal's order and directs the petitioner be registered as a 1966-1971 foreigner.
CJP NHRC petition- sultanpur rape case
1. On September 10, 2019, locals in Baijapur village, Sultanpur district, Uttar Pradesh discovered the brutally mutilated body of a girl hanging from a tree. The body was completely naked and showed signs of severe injuries including a stick inserted in her private parts.
2. The police filed an FIR that contradicted eyewitness accounts and did not properly investigate the crime as a case of sexual assault and rape. They also delayed sending the body for autopsy and made false claims about the autopsy report.
3. Citizens for Justice and Peace has filed a complaint with the National Human Rights Commission seeking an inquiry into the mishandling of the case by the Sultanpur police and to ensure
Privacy act statement website
This document contains a recruiting duty volunteer statement. The volunteer provides their contact information and acknowledges that they will serve a minimum of 36 months of recruiting duty if selected. They understand a background investigation will be conducted and their spouse must also volunteer if married to another soldier. The volunteer has not previously been disapproved for recruiting duty.
Madras hc dowry order
The petitioners, who are the parents of the deceased's husband, were convicted of dowry harassment under Section 498A of IPC for beating and harassing the deceased and demanding jewels and money, which caused her mental agony and suicide. They filed this appeal seeking to suspend their 2-year sentence. While the petitioners argued there were inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and they never lived with the deceased, the court found materials in the record to show the petitioners induced their son to demand dowry. The court dismissed the petition, noting parents have a responsibility to properly raise their children and cannot escape liability by not living with them, and upheld the conviction given the nature of the offense.
What's hot (19)
Complaint to the Honble President of India against Supreme Court of India_04_...
Complaint to the Honble President of India against Supreme Court of India_04_...
WPC 2424/2020 - Excess land can be mutated - James Adhikaram 9447464502
WPC 2424/2020 - Excess land can be mutated - James Adhikaram 9447464502
WPC 28115/2006 Pokkuvaravu of harrison plantation property allowed uploaded b...
WPC 28115/2006 Pokkuvaravu of harrison plantation property allowed uploaded b...
Similar to Phuljan nessa hc order
20210409 guwahati hc bail to chenbhanu begum
This document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Chenbhanu Begum challenging a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner. The court issued notice to the respondents, accepted undertakings from their representatives, and ordered the petitioner to appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond so she is not arrested pending the petition's hearing. Her biometrics will also be captured, and she must seek permission to leave the district. The lower court records will be called for, and the matter will be listed after their receipt.
13.12.2021 res judicata applicable in ft
The petitioner challenged a second proceeding initiated against her by the Foreigners Tribunal declaring her a foreigner, despite an earlier tribunal opinion finding she was not a foreigner. The court allows the petition, setting aside the second opinion as violating the Supreme Court ruling that the principle of res judicata applies to Foreigners Tribunal proceedings. As the petitioner's identity was the same in both proceedings and the tribunal made no finding she was different than the earlier proceedee, the second proceeding against the same person cannot be sustained. The petitioner must be released if detained under the second, now set aside, opinion.
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
1) The document is 52 pages long and appears to be court documents from the Gauhati High Court pertaining to several writ petitions challenging aspects of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam.
2) It includes details of 14 different writ petitions, listing the petitioners and respondents in each case.
3) The petitioners seem to be Assamese residents who did not make it to the final NRC list, challenging their exclusion, while the respondents include the Government of India, Government of Assam, election authorities and NRC authorities.
20211103 gauhati hc order in rehab for assam evicted families
The Gauhati High Court is hearing two PIL cases (PIL No. 65/2021 and PIL (Suo Moto) No. 6/2021) related to eviction and rehabilitation of alleged encroachers in Sipajhar, Assam. The Advocate General of Assam has been granted one week's time to file a detailed counter affidavit in the cases. The petitioner has been given three weeks thereafter to file a rejoinder. No coercive measures are currently being taken against the remaining alleged encroachers as efforts are being made to convince them to move voluntarily. The cases have been listed for further hearing on December 14, 2021.
Written Arguments along with Affidavit before Patna High Court
AO NUMBER : 668271/2019 dated 16-10-2019 for Written Arguments along with Affidavit filed before Patna High Court because Judge refused to hear on 14-10-2019
M.A. D.No.42652 of 2019 in W.P. (Crl) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of In...
Challenged the order dated 21.10.2016 in Writ Petition (Criminal) 136 of 2016 passed by Supreme Court of India
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-457750.pdf
The petitioner Tarapada Namadas challenged an ex-parte opinion by the Foreigners Tribunal declaring his mother Sorojoni Sarkar a foreigner who entered Assam between 1966-1971. The petitioner provided evidence from a 1966 voter list showing his family as Indian citizens. However, an order stated Sorojoni Namadas died in 1991, while the Foreigners Tribunal process server reported serving her in 1997. The court found the ex-parte opinion unsustainable since notice was not properly served on Sorojoni, who was deceased, and quashed the opinion. The petitioner's citizenship rights in India were upheld without reliance on the ex-parte foreigner declaration against his mother.
Sofiya khatun foreigner case sci 12.09.2018 1
This document is a record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding a petition for special leave to appeal. It summarizes the following key points:
1. The Court granted leave in the case and had previously directed the State of Assam to inquire about the citizenship status of the petitioner's family members.
2. In response, an affidavit was filed stating that an inquiry found the petitioner's brothers, husband, and parents (whose names appeared in voter lists from 1965-2018) were Indian citizens.
3. However, the State requested to conduct a full inquiry, which the Court permitted. The Court also directed the petitioner be released on bail and report monthly to police until the inquiry is completed.
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Uttam Chakraborty challenging a Foreigners' Tribunal order declaring him a foreigner. The order issues notice to the respondents and accepts their representation. It also orders that the petitioner not be arrested or deported in the meantime, but must appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond. The petitioner must also provide biometric data and not leave the district without permission. The matter is listed for admission hearing after receiving the lower court records.
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Uttam Chakraborty challenging a Foreigners' Tribunal order declaring him a foreigner. The order issues notice to the respondents and accepts their representation. It also orders that the petitioner not be arrested or deported in the meantime, but must appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond. The petitioner must also provide biometric data and not leave the district without permission. The matter is listed for admission hearing after receiving the lower court records.
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Uttam Chakraborty challenging a Foreigners' Tribunal order declaring him a foreigner. The order issues notice to the respondents and accepts their representation. It also orders that the petitioner not be arrested or deported in the meantime, but must appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond. The petitioner is also directed to not leave the district without providing details and is allowed to remain on bail. The matter is listed for admission hearing after receiving the lower court records.
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
This document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Uttam Chakraborty challenging a Foreigners' Tribunal order declaring him a foreigner. The order issues notice to the respondents and accepts their representation. It also orders that the petitioner not be arrested or deported in the meantime, but must appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond. The petitioner must also provide biometric data and not leave the district without permission. The matter is listed for admission hearing after receiving the lower court records.
Gauhati hc 482 inherent juris for foreigner order
1) The petitioner, Md. Amir Khan, filed a petition seeking to quash the order that convicted him under the Foreigners Act for illegally residing in India.
2) The trial court had framed charges and the petitioner had pled guilty, receiving a two year prison sentence and fine.
3) The petitioner now claims he is not a foreigner but a citizen of Tripura, India based on birth and school documents. However, he did not provide these documents during the investigation or trial.
4) The high court dismissed the petition, finding no illegality in the trial court's order since the petitioner pled guilty without presenting any evidence and the documents are produced only after appealing the conviction.
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
The court remanded the case back to the Foreigners Tribunal to pass a reasoned order after reviewing the records of two previous cases regarding the petitioner's citizenship status. An earlier opinion declaring the petitioner not a foreigner lacked reasons and was therefore not a valid basis for the principle of res judicata to apply. However, in the interest of justice, the court ordered the Tribunal to consider materials from both previous cases and issue a new reasoned ruling, while no coercive action should be taken against the petitioner until then. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.
20200212 munindrabiswas gauhatihc
The petitioner challenged the opinion of the Foreigners Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner of post-1971. The Tribunal held that the petitioner failed to prove that his parents entered Assam before 1966 as required. The High Court dismissed the petition, finding that the Tribunal correctly appreciated the evidence and arrived at a correct finding, as mere production of documents like sale deeds and EPIC card do not prove their contents without proper verification. As the petitioner did not file voter lists prior to 1997, he failed to prove that he had been staying in Assam prior to the cut-off date of March 25, 1971. The High Court held that it would not re-appreciate the evidence and found no perversity in the Tribunal's decision.
Gauhati hc declared foreigner
The document summarizes a court case regarding a man named Papu Roy challenging an ex-parte order declaring his deceased father Ranjeet Roy as a foreigner. The key points are:
1) Papu Roy filed a petition challenging a 2019 ex-parte order declaring his late father Ranjeet Roy, who died in 2007, as a foreigner.
2) The court found that any proceedings against Ranjeet Roy would have abated upon his death in 2007.
3) As such, the 2019 ex-parte order declaring Ranjeet Roy a foreigner was set aside since he had died over a decade prior to the order.
4) However, the court left open the
Gauhati hc order
1) The petitioner had previously been declared not a foreigner by the Foreigners' Tribunal in an earlier case in 2013.
2) A subsequent case proceeded against the petitioner in 2017 and declared her a foreigner.
3) On reviewing both cases, the court found the only differences were minor discrepancies in names, but that it was clear both cases referred to the same person.
4) As the petitioner had already been declared not a foreigner in the earlier 2013 case, the subsequent 2017 case violated the principle of res judicata. The court therefore allowed the petition and declared the petitioner an Indian citizen.
Gauhati HC checks legality of ED summons to Assam newspaper
This order summarizes and addresses a writ petition filed by Jayanta Baruah challenging two notices issued by the Central Bureau of Investigation summoning him to appear as a witness in an ongoing investigation. The court notes the petitioner's objections to the notices and details provided about restrictions on movement in Assam. While the notices were issued under a provision allowing for summons of witnesses, the court finds issues with the short notice periods provided, lack of information on what testimony is sought and from what documents, and timing of the notices in the context of petitioner's journalism work. The court orders the prayer regarding one notice to be disregarded as not pressed, and reserves orders on the other prayers.
20220311 gauhati hc order in hbs comments on eviction case
The court document summarizes a case in which the complainant filed an FIR against the Chief Minister of Assam for alleged communally sensitive statements. The police did not register an FIR and closed the case after a preliminary inquiry. The complainant then filed a petition with the magistrate under Section 156(3) to direct the police to register an FIR. The magistrate allowed the petition, but the state has challenged this in the High Court. The High Court observed that serious legal issues are involved requiring detailed examination. It then issued a notice to the respondent, obtained case records, stayed the magistrate's order and listed the matter for further hearing.
K'taka HC on Marital Rape.pdf
The document summarizes four writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka regarding charges of rape against a husband.
1. The petitions challenge the constitutionality of sections 29 and 30 of the POCSO Act, which place the burden of proof on the accused, as violating Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Indian constitution.
2. One petition was filed by the accused husband seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against him for offenses including rape of his wife under section 376 of the IPC.
3. The lawyers for the accused argued that the presumptions under the POCSO Act are unconstitutional and that the original FIR did not mention offenses under section 376 of the IPC.
4
Similar to Phuljan nessa hc order (20)
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
20211103 gauhati hc order in rehab for assam evicted families
20211103 gauhati hc order in rehab for assam evicted families
Written Arguments along with Affidavit before Patna High Court
Written Arguments along with Affidavit before Patna High Court
M.A. D.No.42652 of 2019 in W.P. (Crl) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of In...
M.A. D.No.42652 of 2019 in W.P. (Crl) 136 of 2016 before Supreme Court of In...
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
20210409 guwahati hc bail order uttam chakraborty (1)
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
gauhati-high-court-foreigner-tribunal-03032023-461954.pdf
Gauhati HC checks legality of ED summons to Assam newspaper
Gauhati HC checks legality of ED summons to Assam newspaper
20220311 gauhati hc order in hbs comments on eviction case
20220311 gauhati hc order in hbs comments on eviction case
Recently uploaded
PAS PSDF Mop Up Workshop Presentation 2024 .pptx
This is the slide deck of what PAS learnt supporting councils awarded Planning Skills Delivery Funds
加急办理华威大学毕业证硕士文凭证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【华威大学毕业证硕士文凭证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
在线办理美国乔治华盛顿大学毕业证（gwu毕业证书）学历学位证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【美国乔治华盛顿大学毕业证（gwu毕业证书）学历学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
在线办理(西班牙UPV毕业证书)瓦伦西亚理工大学毕业证毕业完成信一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(西班牙UPV毕业证书)瓦伦西亚理工大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 40
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
Practical guide for the celebration of World Environment Day on june 5th.
Land degradation, desertification and drought resilience. UN ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME -WORLD ENVIRONMENT DAY 2024.
原版制作(英国Southampton毕业证书)南安普顿大学毕业证录取通知书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(英国Southampton毕业证书)南安普顿大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Border towns and spaces of (in)visibility.pdf
This report explores the significance of border towns and spaces for strengthening responses to young people on the move. In particular it explores the linkages of young people to local service centres with the aim of further developing service, protection, and support strategies for migrant children in border areas across the region. The report is based on a small-scale fieldwork study in the border towns of Chipata and Katete in Zambia conducted in July 2023. Border towns and spaces provide a rich source of information about issues related to the informal or irregular movement of young people across borders, including smuggling and trafficking. They can help build a picture of the nature and scope of the type of movement young migrants undertake and also the forms of protection available to them. Border towns and spaces also provide a lens through which we can better understand the vulnerabilities of young people on the move and, critically, the strategies they use to navigate challenges and access support.
The findings in this report highlight some of the key factors shaping the experiences and vulnerabilities of young people on the move – particularly their proximity to border spaces and how this affects the risks that they face. The report describes strategies that young people on the move employ to remain below the radar of visibility to state and non-state actors due to fear of arrest, detention, and deportation while also trying to keep themselves safe and access support in border towns. These strategies of (in)visibility provide a way to protect themselves yet at the same time also heighten some of the risks young people face as their vulnerabilities are not always recognised by those who could offer support.
In this report we show that the realities and challenges of life and migration in this region and in Zambia need to be better understood for support to be strengthened and tuned to meet the specific needs of young people on the move. This includes understanding the role of state and non-state stakeholders, the impact of laws and policies and, critically, the experiences of the young people themselves. We provide recommendations for immediate action, recommendations for programming to support young people on the move in the two towns that would reduce risk for young people in this area, and recommendations for longer term policy advocacy.
Texas Water Development Board Updates June 2024
Presented at June 6-7 Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Business Meeting
在线办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Abiy Berehe - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Updates
Abiy Berehe - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality UpdatesTexas Alliance of Groundwater Districts
Presented at June 6-7 Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Business Meeting2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 41
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
RFP for Reno's Community Assistance Center
Property appraisals completed in May for downtown Reno’s Community Assistance and Triage Centers (CAC) reveal that repairing the buildings to bring them back into service would cost an estimated $10.1 million—nearly four times the amount previously reported by city staff.
Indira awas yojana housing scheme renamed as PMAY
Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) played a significant role in addressing rural housing needs in India. It emerged as a comprehensive program for affordable housing solutions in rural areas, predating the government’s broader focus on mass housing initiatives.
Awaken new depths - World Ocean Day 2024, June 8th.
UN WOD 2024 will take us on a journey of discovery through the ocean's vastness, tapping into the wisdom and expertise of global policy-makers, scientists, managers, thought leaders, and artists to awaken new depths of understanding, compassion, collaboration and commitment for the ocean and all it sustains. The program will expand our perspectives and appreciation for our blue planet, build new foundations for our relationship to the ocean, and ignite a wave of action toward necessary change.
Recently uploaded (20)
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 40
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 40
Practical guide for the celebration of World Environment Day on june 5th.
Practical guide for the celebration of World Environment Day on june 5th.
Abiy Berehe - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Updates
Abiy Berehe - Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Updates
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 41
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 41
Awaken new depths - World Ocean Day 2024, June 8th.
Awaken new depths - World Ocean Day 2024, June 8th.
Phuljan nessa hc order
- 1. Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010204242017 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C) 7196/2017 1:MUSSTT. PHULJAN NESSA W/O. INNAS ALI, VILL. NO. 1 GARUMARA, P.S. SAMAGURI, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS 1:THE UNION OF INDIA and 4 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, DEPTT. OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMM. and SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME and POLITICAL B DEPTT. DISPUR. 3:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE BORDER NAGAON ASSAM. 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER NAGAON ASSAM. 5:THE OFFICER-ION-CHARGE SAMAGURI POLICE STATION SAMAGURI POLICE STATION NAGAON ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.B C DAS Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM
- 2. Page No.# 2/3 :: BEFORE :: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BORTHAKUR O R D E R 31.10.2019 (Manojit Bhuyan, J) Heard Mr. B.C. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. G. Hazarika, learned counsel representing respondent no.1. Mr. J. Payeng, learned counsel appears for respondent nos.2, 3, 4 and 5. Having regard to the facts of the case, the State Co-ordinator, Assam, National Register of Citizens, Bhangagarh, Guwahati is impleaded as party respondent no.6 in the present petition. Extra copy of the writ petition be served on Ms. A. Verma, learned Standing Counsel, representing the impleaded respondent. List this case for Admission on 05.11.2019, by which date Ms. Verma shall obtain written instructions in the matter and produce the same before this Court. Instructions are sought due to an important aspect having emerged today at the time of hearing, inasmuch as, although the petitioner Phuljan Nessa, wife of Innas Ali, of Village No.1 Garumara, P.S. Samaguri, in the district of Nagaon has been declared as a foreigner of post 1971 stream vide impugned order/opinion dated 25.10.2017 of the Foreigners’ Tribunal,(2nd), Nagaon in F.T. Case No.146/2016, now it is seen that despite being declared as a foreigner, as against “ARN: 101830502032209400628”, the name of Phuljan Nessa has been entered in the National Register of Citizens. Let a copy of the writ petition, copy of this order as well as copy of the ARN
- 3. Page No.# 3/3 Receipt be made available to Ms. Verma during the course of the day. List accordingly. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant