Shaikh farid notice issued order
•
0 likes•112 views
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking compensation from the state government respondents for the death of the minor son/brother of the petitioners, who died due to police firing on September 23, 2021 at their village in Darrang District, Assam. The court issued notice to the respondent state government officials, returnable by December 1, 2021. The petitioners were also directed to serve copies of the writ petition and annexures to the state government advocate by October 26, 2021. The case was listed for further proceedings.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Download to read offline
Recommended
20211103 gauhati hc order in rehab for assam evicted families
The Gauhati High Court is hearing two PIL cases (PIL No. 65/2021 and PIL (Suo Moto) No. 6/2021) related to eviction and rehabilitation of alleged encroachers in Sipajhar, Assam. The Advocate General of Assam has been granted one week's time to file a detailed counter affidavit in the cases. The petitioner has been given three weeks thereafter to file a rejoinder. No coercive measures are currently being taken against the remaining alleged encroachers as efforts are being made to convince them to move voluntarily. The cases have been listed for further hearing on December 14, 2021.
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
1) The document is 52 pages long and appears to be court documents from the Gauhati High Court pertaining to several writ petitions challenging aspects of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam.
2) It includes details of 14 different writ petitions, listing the petitioners and respondents in each case.
3) The petitioners seem to be Assamese residents who did not make it to the final NRC list, challenging their exclusion, while the respondents include the Government of India, Government of Assam, election authorities and NRC authorities.
20210409 guwahati hc bail to chenbhanu begum
This document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Chenbhanu Begum challenging a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner. The court issued notice to the respondents, accepted undertakings from their representatives, and ordered the petitioner to appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond so she is not arrested pending the petition's hearing. Her biometrics will also be captured, and she must seek permission to leave the district. The lower court records will be called for, and the matter will be listed after their receipt.
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil 9447464502
it is ordered in the interest of justice that in
case the subject properties obtained by the petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2 registered sale deeds have already been mutated in favour of the petitioner and the land tax has already been accepted from him as per Ext.P3, then certainly he is the registered
landholder of the subject properties as envisaged in Section 3(3)(d) of the Kerala Land Tax Act,1961, in which case going by the cumulative impact mandate of Section 5 (2) r/w Section 3(3)(d) of
the Kerala Land Tax Act, the respondents are obliged to accept
basic land tax from the petitioner as otherwise it would amount to abdication and dereliction of duties. In that view of the matter, it is ordered that the 1st respondent Village Officer will immediately consider the request for acceptance of basic land tax from the petitioner and will grant the said request without any further delay and will issue receipts in that regard immediately.
Guj hc bail order
The document discusses a court order modifying an earlier order regarding the release of certain petitioners on bail. Specifically, it changes the wording of the earlier order to indicate that petitioners no.2, 6, 7 and 8 should be released on bail rather than petitioners no.1, 6, 7 and 8. The rest of the earlier order is to remain unchanged. The modification order was issued to correct discrepancies pointed out in the note for speaking to minutes.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Recommended
20211103 gauhati hc order in rehab for assam evicted families
The Gauhati High Court is hearing two PIL cases (PIL No. 65/2021 and PIL (Suo Moto) No. 6/2021) related to eviction and rehabilitation of alleged encroachers in Sipajhar, Assam. The Advocate General of Assam has been granted one week's time to file a detailed counter affidavit in the cases. The petitioner has been given three weeks thereafter to file a rejoinder. No coercive measures are currently being taken against the remaining alleged encroachers as efforts are being made to convince them to move voluntarily. The cases have been listed for further hearing on December 14, 2021.
20191129 gauhati hc order in 29 gorkha ft cases wpc 8490 18
1) The document is 52 pages long and appears to be court documents from the Gauhati High Court pertaining to several writ petitions challenging aspects of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam.
2) It includes details of 14 different writ petitions, listing the petitioners and respondents in each case.
3) The petitioners seem to be Assamese residents who did not make it to the final NRC list, challenging their exclusion, while the respondents include the Government of India, Government of Assam, election authorities and NRC authorities.
20210409 guwahati hc bail to chenbhanu begum
This document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Chenbhanu Begum challenging a Foreigners Tribunal order declaring her a foreigner. The court issued notice to the respondents, accepted undertakings from their representatives, and ordered the petitioner to appear before the Superintendent of Police and furnish a bail bond so she is not arrested pending the petition's hearing. Her biometrics will also be captured, and she must seek permission to leave the district. The lower court records will be called for, and the matter will be listed after their receipt.
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Jos...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Wpc 40473 /2017 - Non acceptance of Basic tax in Kerala Uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil 9447464502
it is ordered in the interest of justice that in
case the subject properties obtained by the petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2 registered sale deeds have already been mutated in favour of the petitioner and the land tax has already been accepted from him as per Ext.P3, then certainly he is the registered
landholder of the subject properties as envisaged in Section 3(3)(d) of the Kerala Land Tax Act,1961, in which case going by the cumulative impact mandate of Section 5 (2) r/w Section 3(3)(d) of
the Kerala Land Tax Act, the respondents are obliged to accept
basic land tax from the petitioner as otherwise it would amount to abdication and dereliction of duties. In that view of the matter, it is ordered that the 1st respondent Village Officer will immediately consider the request for acceptance of basic land tax from the petitioner and will grant the said request without any further delay and will issue receipts in that regard immediately.
Guj hc bail order
The document discusses a court order modifying an earlier order regarding the release of certain petitioners on bail. Specifically, it changes the wording of the earlier order to indicate that petitioners no.2, 6, 7 and 8 should be released on bail rather than petitioners no.1, 6, 7 and 8. The rest of the earlier order is to remain unchanged. The modification order was issued to correct discrepancies pointed out in the note for speaking to minutes.
Gauhati hc
1) The petitioner had been declared a foreigner by a Foreigners Tribunal in Jorhat and has been in detention since May 2019, nearing completion of two years in detention.
2) In light of Supreme Court orders on releasing detainees who have completed two years to avoid COVID spread, the court directs the petitioner's release on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 5,000 and one surety of the same amount.
3) The court reiterates an earlier order directing authorities to release all detainees who have completed two years, on a personal bond and one surety to address the pandemic, while complying with other directions.
Gauhati hc sep 9 order
The document is an order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Asor Uddin challenging a ex-parte order from the Foreigners' Tribunal declaring him to be a foreigner. The High Court allowed the petition, set aside the ex-parte order, and remanded the matter back to the Foreigners' Tribunal for fresh proceedings. However, the petitioner was ordered to remain on bail, appear before the Superintendent of Police, and the Foreigners' Tribunal by certain dates or the ex-parte order would be revived.
Maqbool alam order
The document is a 3-page court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a bail application filed by Maqbool Alam, who was charged with several offenses including praising a terrorist organization on Facebook. The court heard arguments from Alam's lawyer and the public prosecutor. Upon reviewing the Facebook posts and finding that they did not require further custodial interrogation, the court granted bail to Alam subject to furnishing a bond and ensuring he does not interfere with the investigation.
Madras hc anti caa cases quashed
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
Crlp80 21-04-10-2021
The petitioner seeks to quash criminal proceedings against him for offenses under Sections 172, 173 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(F), 3(1)(g) of SC/ST (POA) Act. The allegations are that the petitioner, who owns 5 acres 4 guntas of land, wrongfully claimed ownership of 3 acres 3 guntas of the second respondent's neighboring land and obtained revenue records in his name. However, the court finds that the dispute appears to be civil in nature regarding ownership of land between two parties. Further, the ingredients to prove offenses under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of SC/ST Act are not made out based on the facts.
Mp hc wp 9799 2021_final_order_28-jul-2021
1. The petitioner challenged his detention order under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980.
2. The petitioner was running a business and an FIR was registered against him for illegally stocking and selling oxygen cylinders without a license. A raid found 571 jumbo and 90 small oxygen cylinders in his warehouse.
3. The petitioner argued that the detaining authority failed to consider that he was already in custody at the time the detention order was passed and his potential release on bail, which is required. The court found no mention of the petitioner's custody in the detention order.
കുട്ടികളുടെ പേരിലുള്ള വസ്തു പോക്കുവരവ് ചെയ്യുമ്പോൾ ----Pokkuvaravu of minors ...
കുട്ടികളുടെ പേരിലുള്ള വസ്തു പോക്കുവരവ് ചെയ്യുമ്പോൾ ----Pokkuvaravu of minors ...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Pokkuvaravu of minors property Minor മാരുടെ കൈമാറ്റം ചെയ്യപ്പെട്ട ഭൂമി പോക്കുവരവ് ചെയ്യുന്നത് സംബന്ധിച്ചുള്ള ഹൈക്കോടതി ഉത്തരവ് uploaded by T James Joseph Deputy Deputy CollectorKerala hc on sma
The petitioner sought permission for her marriage to be solemnized and registered digitally under the Special Marriage Act as she had to leave India urgently to start a postgraduate course in the UK. However, the Court dismissed the petition noting that the Act requires the physical presence of the parties and witnesses for solemnization and registration. It observed that the 30 day notice period and other procedures under the Act cannot be relaxed or conducted digitally as penal consequences are prescribed for non-compliance. Given an earlier ruling, the Court held that unless the Act is amended, marriage cannot be solemnized digitally or before the notice period expires.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Kush kalra sc order
The Supreme Court of India heard several petitions related to women's participation and recruitment in the Indian military. For one of the petitions, the Court directed the petitioner to file a rejoinder within a week and listed the matter for further hearing on September 8th. For another petition regarding a stay, the Court issued an interim order allowing women candidates to take an upcoming examination subject to the Court's further orders. The Court also directed the Union Public Service Commission to publicize the interim orders widely. The Court listed several related matters regarding women's participation in Sainik Schools and the Rashtriya Indian Military College for hearing on September 8th as well.
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil As already noted hereinabove, the 1st respondent Tahsildar
as the authority concerned with grant of mutation and Transfer of
Registry, has no power to examine such vexed issues of title and
therefore he has unnecessarily strayed himself into areas which are
totally irrelevant and not germane for the purpose of the enquiry for
exercising the powers conferred on him. It has been held by this
Court in a catena of decisions as in SAINUDHEEN Vs. STATE OF
KERALA [2013 (1) KHC 437 , para 13] that the Tahsildar, as the
mutation granting authority, cannot decide on the validity of the
documents, and the title of the previous owner and that Rule 16 of the
Transfer of Registry Rules has made the said position abundantly
clear. Rule 16 of the Transfer of Registry Rules mandates that “the
summary, enquiry and decision thereon is only an arrangement for
fiscal purposes, and it does not affect the title of any person in
respect of the lands covered with the decisions in Transfer of
Registry cases and the question of legal right is always subject to
adjudication by civil courts and pattas could be revised from time to
time in accordance with such judicial decisions. It has been held by
the Apex Court and various High Courts in various decisions as in
SURNEY Vs INDER KAUR [AIR 1996 SC 2823] that mutation of
W.P.(C).39769/18 - : 18 :-
property in the revenue records does not create or extinguish title,
nor has it any presumptive value on title and it only enables the
person in whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue
in question. Therefore in cases like the present one, where the
registered land holder concerned has transferred the property, then
the transferees/assignees will stand in the shoe of the land holder
and by the cumulative impact of Sec. 5(2) and Sec. 3(3) (d), the
competent revenue officials are under the bounden and statutory
obligation to accept basic land tax from them. Otherwise it will
amount to nothing but abdication to statutory obligations and duties
of such competent revenue officials, which directly leads to loss of
revenue.
20220311 gauhati hc order in hbs comments on eviction case
The court document summarizes a case in which the complainant filed an FIR against the Chief Minister of Assam for alleged communally sensitive statements. The police did not register an FIR and closed the case after a preliminary inquiry. The complainant then filed a petition with the magistrate under Section 156(3) to direct the police to register an FIR. The magistrate allowed the petition, but the state has challenged this in the High Court. The High Court observed that serious legal issues are involved requiring detailed examination. It then issued a notice to the respondent, obtained case records, stayed the magistrate's order and listed the matter for further hearing.
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021
The petitioners, Siddharth Varadarajan and another, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against them under Sections 153-B and 505(2) of IPC by the Rampur Police. The state was given 3 weeks to file a counter affidavit. The court also ordered that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners pursuant to the interim protection granted by the Supreme Court until the next hearing on November 24th. The petitioners must also submit a self-attested computer generated copy of the Supreme Court order along with an identity proof.
Guj hc pasa aug 25 order
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
Foundation for ind journ crlp(a) 9053 2021
The document summarizes a court case between the Foundation for Independent Journalism (petitioner) and the State of U.P. and others (respondents). The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against them and for a direction not to harass/arrest them based on the FIR. The court granted the state 3 weeks to file a counter affidavit and the petitioner 1 week to file a rejoinder affidavit. The next hearing was scheduled for November 24, 2021 and no coercive action was allowed against the petitioner until then based on interim protection from the Supreme Court.
Mp hc phc in prisons
The court considered an application for suspension of sentence from appellant Lalji Singh who was convicted of murder and other charges, and granted a further 90 day suspension of his sentence due to his heart ailment and the lack of proper medical facilities and transport in the jail. The court directed the state to improve primary healthcare in jails, including establishing on-site health centers, and to submit a report on current medical facilities, citing precedents requiring protection of prisoners' human rights.
Sc order uapa sep 9
The Supreme Court of India allowed an appeal challenging the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The appellants were arrested in connection with offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sought bail after 90 days as no chargesheet was filed. The High Court had rejected bail, noting the extension granted to the investigation. However, the Supreme Court held that under its previous judgment, the Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to extend the investigation period for UAPA offenses. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to default bail as the investigation was not completed within the prescribed period. The Court directed the appellants be released on bail and for the trial to be concluded expeditiously.
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
1. The document is a court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by V.S. Achuthanandan, a former Chief Minister of Kerala, seeking to quash an FIR registered against him for alleged offenses of corruption and criminal misconduct.
2. The FIR was registered based on a vigilance inquiry ordered by the new government into the assignment of government land to a relative of Achuthanandan during his tenure as Chief Minister.
3. Achuthanandan contends that there was no illegality in the land assignment or subsequent decision to exempt the assignee from alienation restrictions. The government argues there is evidence of abuse of power and conspiracy to provide wrongful gain.
4.
No animal slaughter in public place: HC to West Bengal.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
GA 2325 of 2018
WP 328 of 2018
RAJYASHREE CHAUDHURI
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. ORDER DT. 21/08/2018.
Eid uz Zoha Sacrifice of the cow was not an integral part of the festivaland was not a religious requirement under Islam....
State Govt agrees to stop nuisance of slaughter in public from next year.
No animal slaughter in public place: HC to West Bengal.
SEE FULL REPORT AT https://wp.me/pCXJT-9np .
Allahabad hc may 20 order
The court heard a bail application where the prosecution was not able to present full facts due to lack of instructions from police. The court directed police to explain. Police confirmed instructions now available and enquiry ordered into failure to provide earlier. The court discussed prior case law on timely bail hearings and directed the DGP to create a transparent procedure for police to provide timely instructions to prosecutors for bail hearings across UP within 8 weeks.
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
July delhi hc order
1. Gulfisha Fatima filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to direct the State to produce her and release her from what she claims is illegal custody.
2. She was arrested in connection with multiple FIRs including charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. Her bail applications were dismissed except for one case where she was granted bail.
3. The court dismissed the writ petition stating that her detention was not illegal as she was in judicial custody pursuant to court orders and the remedy lies in appealing those orders, not through a writ of habeas corpus.
Maynal haque order
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the 2 page court document:
The document is from the Gauhati High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh regarding a writ petition filed by Makbul Ali and Ainuddin against the State of Assam and its Commissioner and Secretary of Home Affairs, Deputy Commissioner of Darrang, Director General of Police of Assam, and Superintendent of Police of Darrang. The matter was listed along with another writ petition for hearing on December 1, 2021 before the Hon'ble Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak as prayed for by the petitioners.
Smt_Jayamma_vs_The_State_Of_Karnataka_on_24_January_2020.PDF
This document summarizes a court case in the Karnataka High Court regarding a land dispute between several petitioners and respondents over ownership of 2 acres and 10 guntas of land in Begur Village. The petitioners claimed ownership based on their grandfather and grandmother previously owning portions of the land. The court case involved multiple appeals over several years as the fourth respondent also claimed ownership of portions of the same land. The petitioners filed a writ petition to challenge orders by the Special Tahsildar that directed entering the fourth respondent's name in the land records for the disputed property. The High Court referred several questions to a larger bench regarding the State's powers to adjudicate land disputes and whether certain provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue
More Related Content
What's hot
Madras hc anti caa cases quashed
The court quashed criminal proceedings against two petitioners who were accused of protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act in 2019. The court found that while the petitioners' protest was unlawful for lacking proper permission, it was a peaceful protest and no criminal acts occurred. Further, witness statements did not properly identify the petitioners as being involved. Prior court rulings established the right to peaceful protest. Thus, the court concluded there was no prima facie evidence against the petitioners and continuing the prosecution would be an abuse of process.
Crlp80 21-04-10-2021
The petitioner seeks to quash criminal proceedings against him for offenses under Sections 172, 173 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(F), 3(1)(g) of SC/ST (POA) Act. The allegations are that the petitioner, who owns 5 acres 4 guntas of land, wrongfully claimed ownership of 3 acres 3 guntas of the second respondent's neighboring land and obtained revenue records in his name. However, the court finds that the dispute appears to be civil in nature regarding ownership of land between two parties. Further, the ingredients to prove offenses under Sections 3(1)(f) and 3(1)(g) of SC/ST Act are not made out based on the facts.
Mp hc wp 9799 2021_final_order_28-jul-2021
1. The petitioner challenged his detention order under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980.
2. The petitioner was running a business and an FIR was registered against him for illegally stocking and selling oxygen cylinders without a license. A raid found 571 jumbo and 90 small oxygen cylinders in his warehouse.
3. The petitioner argued that the detaining authority failed to consider that he was already in custody at the time the detention order was passed and his potential release on bail, which is required. The court found no mention of the petitioner's custody in the detention order.
കുട്ടികളുടെ പേരിലുള്ള വസ്തു പോക്കുവരവ് ചെയ്യുമ്പോൾ ----Pokkuvaravu of minors ...
കുട്ടികളുടെ പേരിലുള്ള വസ്തു പോക്കുവരവ് ചെയ്യുമ്പോൾ ----Pokkuvaravu of minors ...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
Pokkuvaravu of minors property Minor മാരുടെ കൈമാറ്റം ചെയ്യപ്പെട്ട ഭൂമി പോക്കുവരവ് ചെയ്യുന്നത് സംബന്ധിച്ചുള്ള ഹൈക്കോടതി ഉത്തരവ് uploaded by T James Joseph Deputy Deputy CollectorKerala hc on sma
The petitioner sought permission for her marriage to be solemnized and registered digitally under the Special Marriage Act as she had to leave India urgently to start a postgraduate course in the UK. However, the Court dismissed the petition noting that the Act requires the physical presence of the parties and witnesses for solemnization and registration. It observed that the 30 day notice period and other procedures under the Act cannot be relaxed or conducted digitally as penal consequences are prescribed for non-compliance. Given an earlier ruling, the Court held that unless the Act is amended, marriage cannot be solemnized digitally or before the notice period expires.
Madras hc bail caa mar 25 order
The petitioner, Jafar Sathick, filed a criminal original petition to quash the FIR registered against him in Crime No. 63 of 2020 by the Boothapandy Police Station. The FIR alleged that the petitioner organized a protest against amendments to the Citizenship Laws that caused public nuisance and hindered traffic. However, the court noted that the protest was peaceful with no untoward incidents. Since the investigation was almost complete, the court quashed the FIR against the petitioner while emphasizing the constitutional right to peaceful protest without arms.
Maulana fazlul order
The applicant Maulana Fazlul Karim Qasimi was arrested in August 2021 for a Facebook post expressing the view that the Taliban in Afghanistan are not terrorists. The applicant's lawyer argued that the court had granted bail to someone in a similar case for expressing such an opinion. While reviewing the case diary, the court found nothing incriminating against the applicant beyond the Facebook post. Given the lack of other evidence, the court doubted if the post alone constituted a cognizable offense. Therefore, the court directed that the applicant be released on bail on furnishing a bond, finding further custody unnecessary in this case.
Kush kalra sc order
The Supreme Court of India heard several petitions related to women's participation and recruitment in the Indian military. For one of the petitions, the Court directed the petitioner to file a rejoinder within a week and listed the matter for further hearing on September 8th. For another petition regarding a stay, the Court issued an interim order allowing women candidates to take an upcoming examination subject to the Court's further orders. The Court also directed the Union Public Service Commission to publicize the interim orders widely. The Court listed several related matters regarding women's participation in Sainik Schools and the Rashtriya Indian Military College for hearing on September 8th as well.
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...Jamesadhikaram land matter consultancy 9447464502
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil As already noted hereinabove, the 1st respondent Tahsildar
as the authority concerned with grant of mutation and Transfer of
Registry, has no power to examine such vexed issues of title and
therefore he has unnecessarily strayed himself into areas which are
totally irrelevant and not germane for the purpose of the enquiry for
exercising the powers conferred on him. It has been held by this
Court in a catena of decisions as in SAINUDHEEN Vs. STATE OF
KERALA [2013 (1) KHC 437 , para 13] that the Tahsildar, as the
mutation granting authority, cannot decide on the validity of the
documents, and the title of the previous owner and that Rule 16 of the
Transfer of Registry Rules has made the said position abundantly
clear. Rule 16 of the Transfer of Registry Rules mandates that “the
summary, enquiry and decision thereon is only an arrangement for
fiscal purposes, and it does not affect the title of any person in
respect of the lands covered with the decisions in Transfer of
Registry cases and the question of legal right is always subject to
adjudication by civil courts and pattas could be revised from time to
time in accordance with such judicial decisions. It has been held by
the Apex Court and various High Courts in various decisions as in
SURNEY Vs INDER KAUR [AIR 1996 SC 2823] that mutation of
W.P.(C).39769/18 - : 18 :-
property in the revenue records does not create or extinguish title,
nor has it any presumptive value on title and it only enables the
person in whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue
in question. Therefore in cases like the present one, where the
registered land holder concerned has transferred the property, then
the transferees/assignees will stand in the shoe of the land holder
and by the cumulative impact of Sec. 5(2) and Sec. 3(3) (d), the
competent revenue officials are under the bounden and statutory
obligation to accept basic land tax from them. Otherwise it will
amount to nothing but abdication to statutory obligations and duties
of such competent revenue officials, which directly leads to loss of
revenue.
20220311 gauhati hc order in hbs comments on eviction case
The court document summarizes a case in which the complainant filed an FIR against the Chief Minister of Assam for alleged communally sensitive statements. The police did not register an FIR and closed the case after a preliminary inquiry. The complainant then filed a petition with the magistrate under Section 156(3) to direct the police to register an FIR. The magistrate allowed the petition, but the state has challenged this in the High Court. The High Court observed that serious legal issues are involved requiring detailed examination. It then issued a notice to the respondent, obtained case records, stayed the magistrate's order and listed the matter for further hearing.
Vardarajan crlp(a) 8431 2021
The petitioners, Siddharth Varadarajan and another, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against them under Sections 153-B and 505(2) of IPC by the Rampur Police. The state was given 3 weeks to file a counter affidavit. The court also ordered that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners pursuant to the interim protection granted by the Supreme Court until the next hearing on November 24th. The petitioners must also submit a self-attested computer generated copy of the Supreme Court order along with an identity proof.
Guj hc pasa aug 25 order
The High Court of Gujarat quashed four detention orders issued by the District Magistrate of Amreli under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act against four petitioners for allegedly being "property grabbers". The Court found that the detaining authority erred in treating the petitioners' activities as prejudicial to public order, as it was a private property dispute. The Court also noted that the justification provided by the state for issuing the detention orders - that the petitioners would continue illegal activities with advocate help - was untenable. The rule was made absolute and the detention orders were quashed.
Foundation for ind journ crlp(a) 9053 2021
The document summarizes a court case between the Foundation for Independent Journalism (petitioner) and the State of U.P. and others (respondents). The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking to quash an FIR registered against them and for a direction not to harass/arrest them based on the FIR. The court granted the state 3 weeks to file a counter affidavit and the petitioner 1 week to file a rejoinder affidavit. The next hearing was scheduled for November 24, 2021 and no coercive action was allowed against the petitioner until then based on interim protection from the Supreme Court.
Mp hc phc in prisons
The court considered an application for suspension of sentence from appellant Lalji Singh who was convicted of murder and other charges, and granted a further 90 day suspension of his sentence due to his heart ailment and the lack of proper medical facilities and transport in the jail. The court directed the state to improve primary healthcare in jails, including establishing on-site health centers, and to submit a report on current medical facilities, citing precedents requiring protection of prisoners' human rights.
Sc order uapa sep 9
The Supreme Court of India allowed an appeal challenging the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The appellants were arrested in connection with offenses under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sought bail after 90 days as no chargesheet was filed. The High Court had rejected bail, noting the extension granted to the investigation. However, the Supreme Court held that under its previous judgment, the Magistrate did not have jurisdiction to extend the investigation period for UAPA offenses. Therefore, the appellants were entitled to default bail as the investigation was not completed within the prescribed period. The Court directed the appellants be released on bail and for the trial to be concluded expeditiously.
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
1. The document is a court judgment regarding a writ petition filed by V.S. Achuthanandan, a former Chief Minister of Kerala, seeking to quash an FIR registered against him for alleged offenses of corruption and criminal misconduct.
2. The FIR was registered based on a vigilance inquiry ordered by the new government into the assignment of government land to a relative of Achuthanandan during his tenure as Chief Minister.
3. Achuthanandan contends that there was no illegality in the land assignment or subsequent decision to exempt the assignee from alienation restrictions. The government argues there is evidence of abuse of power and conspiracy to provide wrongful gain.
4.
No animal slaughter in public place: HC to West Bengal.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction
ORIGINAL SIDE
GA 2325 of 2018
WP 328 of 2018
RAJYASHREE CHAUDHURI
Versus
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. ORDER DT. 21/08/2018.
Eid uz Zoha Sacrifice of the cow was not an integral part of the festivaland was not a religious requirement under Islam....
State Govt agrees to stop nuisance of slaughter in public from next year.
No animal slaughter in public place: HC to West Bengal.
SEE FULL REPORT AT https://wp.me/pCXJT-9np .
Allahabad hc may 20 order
The court heard a bail application where the prosecution was not able to present full facts due to lack of instructions from police. The court directed police to explain. Police confirmed instructions now available and enquiry ordered into failure to provide earlier. The court discussed prior case law on timely bail hearings and directed the DGP to create a transparent procedure for police to provide timely instructions to prosecutors for bail hearings across UP within 8 weeks.
M p bangle seller bail
1) The applicant Golu @ Tasneem @ Taslim filed a bail application in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh seeking bail in connection with a crime registered under various sections of IPC and POCSO Act.
2) It was argued for the applicant that he is the first offender and has been in custody since August 23, 2021. His custodial interrogation is no longer required.
3) The prosecution opposed the bail plea submitting that various identity cards of different names were recovered from the applicant. The court examined the facts of the case and granted bail to the applicant with various conditions.
July delhi hc order
1. Gulfisha Fatima filed a writ petition seeking a writ of habeas corpus to direct the State to produce her and release her from what she claims is illegal custody.
2. She was arrested in connection with multiple FIRs including charges under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act. Her bail applications were dismissed except for one case where she was granted bail.
3. The court dismissed the writ petition stating that her detention was not illegal as she was in judicial custody pursuant to court orders and the remedy lies in appealing those orders, not through a writ of habeas corpus.
What's hot (20)
കുട്ടികളുടെ പേരിലുള്ള വസ്തു പോക്കുവരവ് ചെയ്യുമ്പോൾ ----Pokkuvaravu of minors ...
കുട്ടികളുടെ പേരിലുള്ള വസ്തു പോക്കുവരവ് ചെയ്യുമ്പോൾ ----Pokkuvaravu of minors ...
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...
WPC 39769 /2018 b uploaded by James Joseph Adhikarathil പോക്കുവരവ് അപേക്ഷ- ...
20220311 gauhati hc order in hbs comments on eviction case
20220311 gauhati hc order in hbs comments on eviction case
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
High court single bench judgment soman case - wpc no 21529 of 2012
No animal slaughter in public place: HC to West Bengal.
No animal slaughter in public place: HC to West Bengal.
Similar to Shaikh farid notice issued order
Maynal haque order
This 3 sentence summary provides the essential information from the 2 page court document:
The document is from the Gauhati High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh regarding a writ petition filed by Makbul Ali and Ainuddin against the State of Assam and its Commissioner and Secretary of Home Affairs, Deputy Commissioner of Darrang, Director General of Police of Assam, and Superintendent of Police of Darrang. The matter was listed along with another writ petition for hearing on December 1, 2021 before the Hon'ble Justice Manash Ranjan Pathak as prayed for by the petitioners.
Smt_Jayamma_vs_The_State_Of_Karnataka_on_24_January_2020.PDF
This document summarizes a court case in the Karnataka High Court regarding a land dispute between several petitioners and respondents over ownership of 2 acres and 10 guntas of land in Begur Village. The petitioners claimed ownership based on their grandfather and grandmother previously owning portions of the land. The court case involved multiple appeals over several years as the fourth respondent also claimed ownership of portions of the same land. The petitioners filed a writ petition to challenge orders by the Special Tahsildar that directed entering the fourth respondent's name in the land records for the disputed property. The High Court referred several questions to a larger bench regarding the State's powers to adjudicate land disputes and whether certain provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue
Tablighi jamaat ktaka hc order
These petitions were filed in the High Court of Karnataka seeking to quash several FIRs registered in Tumkur district against various foreign nationals for alleged violations of the Foreigners Act. The FIRs were registered by the Thilak Park police station in Tumkur based on complaints filed against the petitioners for participating in religious activities while being in India on a tourist visa. The petitions argued that the FIRs should be quashed as no cognizable offense was made out in the complaints. The court heard petitions from over 15 foreign nationals seeking to quash the FIRs.
Sonali order 2(1)
1. The court is following up on orders it previously passed on July 1st and August 27th directing state authorities in Jharkhand to comply with Supreme Court orders regarding treatment, aftercare, and rehabilitation of acid attack victims.
2. The Supreme Court had convened a meeting where it was decided that states must treat acid attack victims, involve private hospitals, not refuse treatment, provide first aid and further care, and take action against non-compliant hospitals.
3. The court is unhappy that Jharkhand authorities have not provided a concrete response or shown compliance with the Supreme Court orders, and warns that the Chief Secretary and other officials may have to appear in person at the next hearing if no affidavit
karnataka-hc-1-456310.pdf
This document is a court order from the High Court of Karnataka summarizing a criminal case and petition. It discusses:
1) A complaint was filed alleging the petitioners trespassed a property, picked a quarrel, abused the complainant and threatened him and others with dire consequences.
2) The petitioners filed a writ petition to quash the criminal proceedings. The court analyzed the complaint and statements and found offenses under IPC and SC/ST Act were made out.
3) While some offenses may not apply to all petitioners, there was a joint trial required. The court dismissed the petition, finding ingredients for the charges were present and quashing was not justified. The criminal proceedings against the petition
20200512 guj hc order on chudasama election 2017
This document is a judgment from the High Court of Gujarat regarding an election petition challenging the results of the 2017 Gujarat state assembly election in the 58-Dholka constituency. It summarizes the key details of the case, including the allegations made by the petitioner (candidate who lost the election) against the returning officer and winning candidate. It records the evidence and arguments presented by both sides and provides answers to the issues framed by the court. In the end, it outlines the court's final order in the case.
Gauri lankesh case final slp regarding accused number 6 (1)
The document appears to be a petition filed in the Supreme Court of India challenging a high court order related to the investigation and prosecution of a murder case. Specifically, it challenges an order that quashed the sanction order and supplementary charge sheet filed against an accused, Mohan Nayak, under the Karnataka Control of Organised Crime Act for his alleged involvement in the 2017 murder of journalist Gauri Lankesh. The petitioner argues the high court failed to properly examine the relevant provisions and facts of the case in quashing the sanction order and invokes the court's jurisdiction to do justice in this high-profile murder case.
Hp hc inter caste judgment
The document summarizes a court case in India regarding an inter-caste marriage. It details that petitioner Sanjeev Kumar and Komal Parmar applied to marry under the Special Marriage Act but Komal's family strongly opposed the marriage due to differences in caste. Komal's family detained her to prevent the marriage. The court ordered Komal be produced and she stated her desire to not return to her family due to threats and abuse, but also did not want to marry Sanjeev. The court considered statements and evidence from both families over multiple hearings to make a determination in the case.
Gauhati hc order
1) The petitioner had previously been declared not a foreigner by the Foreigners' Tribunal in an earlier case in 2013.
2) A subsequent case proceeded against the petitioner in 2017 and declared her a foreigner.
3) On reviewing both cases, the court found the only differences were minor discrepancies in names, but that it was clear both cases referred to the same person.
4) As the petitioner had already been declared not a foreigner in the earlier 2013 case, the subsequent 2017 case violated the principle of res judicata. The court therefore allowed the petition and declared the petitioner an Indian citizen.
Sanji ram v state
The petitioner, Sanji Ram, sought parole for 8 weeks to attend his son's marriage. However, the court denied his request. According to a police report, the victim's relatives had returned to the village where the marriage was to take place. There were concerns that granting parole could lead to community clashes and protests in Jammu and Kashmir given the apprehensions around the case. As a result, the court dismissed the petition due to the genuine law and order concerns expressed by releasing the petitioner.
Phuljan nessa hc order
This document is a court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding a writ petition filed by Phuljan Nessa challenging a Foreigners' Tribunal order declaring her to be a foreigner after 1971. The court heard arguments from lawyers for both sides. It noted that despite being declared a foreigner, Phuljan Nessa's name has been entered in the National Register of Citizens. As such, the court impleaded the State Coordinator of Assam NRC as an additional respondent. It directed service of documents on the new respondent and listed the case for admission on a future date to obtain written instructions on this important issue that emerged.
Lutfor Ali v assam.pdf
The document is a court order from the Gauhati High Court regarding an application for anticipatory bail filed by four applicants (Lutfor Ali, Rakmat Mollah, Jorina Khatun, and Ikbal Hussain Sikdar) who were apprehending arrest in connection with a case registered under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The court heard from the counsels for the applicants and the state. Considering the facts and circumstances, the court granted interim anticipatory bail to the applicants, allowing them to be released on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 each with a local surety of the same amount, but requiring them to appear before the investigating officer within two weeks
Deliberate attempt by Mangalore police to cover up excesses: Karnataka HC
This document summarizes four criminal petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka regarding individuals arrested for their involvement in violent protests in Mangaluru, Karnataka in December 2019 against the Citizenship Amendment Act and National Register of Citizens. The petitions seek bail for the individuals who have been charged with serious offenses like attempted murder and destruction of public property. The State opposes bail, arguing that the individuals conspired in the violence and there is risk they may engage in further illegal activities if released. The Court is considering whether to grant bail to the individuals.
Sample criminal proceedings
The petitioner Pushpalatha S filed a petition against respondent Guruswamy S under Section 125(1) of CrPC seeking maintenance. The petitioner and respondent got married on 12-08-2010 in a mass marriage ceremony registered in the Sub-Registrar office of Chamarajanagar. However, the respondent left the petitioner and started living separately without reasonable cause after 2 months of marriage. The petitioner has no independent source of income and is unable to maintain herself. Hence, the petitioner requested that the respondent be directed to pay monthly maintenance of Rs. 5000 for her livelihood.
Court formats
This include some important formats applicable in Indian courts and is very essential for Law Students.
These formats may even be translated to the local (scheduled) indian languages and may be used in the respective courts.
Gauhati HC checks legality of ED summons to Assam newspaper
This order summarizes and addresses a writ petition filed by Jayanta Baruah challenging two notices issued by the Central Bureau of Investigation summoning him to appear as a witness in an ongoing investigation. The court notes the petitioner's objections to the notices and details provided about restrictions on movement in Assam. While the notices were issued under a provision allowing for summons of witnesses, the court finds issues with the short notice periods provided, lack of information on what testimony is sought and from what documents, and timing of the notices in the context of petitioner's journalism work. The court orders the prayer regarding one notice to be disregarded as not pressed, and reserves orders on the other prayers.
pramod-kumar-pradhan-v-principal-secretary-water-resources-department-bhubane...
pramod-kumar-pradhan-v-principal-secretary-water-resources-department-bhubaneswar-16-january-2023-455300.pdf
E.mohanammal
The petitioner filed a criminal petition seeking police protection from the third respondent and his brother who were interfering with her property possession and threatening her. However, the court dismissed the petition stating that there is a pending civil dispute between the petitioner and third respondent regarding the same property. The court noted that the police cannot interfere unless directed by the civil court handling the property dispute case. The petitioner was given liberty to seek appropriate remedies from the lower civil court, including police protection or initiating contempt proceedings.
cra-d454202109112023finalorder-2-503843.pdf
पंजाब एंड हरियाणा हाईकोर्ट ने कड़े गैरकानूनी गतिविधि रोकथाम अधिनियम (UAPA Act) के तहत गिरफ्तार किए गए व्यक्ति को जमानत दे दी। कोर्ट ने यह यह देखते हुए उक्त व्यक्ति को जमानत दी कि पाकिस्तान के साथ संबंधों के आधार पर कथित तौर पर कुछ आतंकवादी कृत्यों को अंजाम देने की योजना बनाने के मामले में प्रथम दृष्टया कोई मामला नहीं बनता है।
231129-Madras-HC-order.pdf;lgd;lksajpojprj
रूट्सतमिल के प्रधान संपादक करिकालन छह साल से अधिक समय से पत्रकारिता में थे, जब उन्होंने निडर तरीके से तमिलनाडु के भाजपा नेता अन्नामलाई से कड़े सवाल पूछे तो उनके चैनल को उनके गुस्से का निशाना बनना पड़ा था।
Similar to Shaikh farid notice issued order (20)
Smt_Jayamma_vs_The_State_Of_Karnataka_on_24_January_2020.PDF
Smt_Jayamma_vs_The_State_Of_Karnataka_on_24_January_2020.PDF
Gauri lankesh case final slp regarding accused number 6 (1)
Gauri lankesh case final slp regarding accused number 6 (1)
Deliberate attempt by Mangalore police to cover up excesses: Karnataka HC
Deliberate attempt by Mangalore police to cover up excesses: Karnataka HC
Gauhati HC checks legality of ED summons to Assam newspaper
Gauhati HC checks legality of ED summons to Assam newspaper
pramod-kumar-pradhan-v-principal-secretary-water-resources-department-bhubane...
pramod-kumar-pradhan-v-principal-secretary-water-resources-department-bhubane...
Recently uploaded
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022
A draft Ukraine-Russia treaty from April 2022, published here in full for the first time.
Essential Tools for Modern PR Business .pptx
Discover the essential tools and strategies for modern PR business success. Learn how to craft compelling news releases, leverage press release sites and news wires, stay updated with PR news, and integrate effective PR practices to enhance your brand's visibility and credibility. Elevate your PR efforts with our comprehensive guide.
13062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
केरल उच्च न्यायालय ने 11 जून, 2024 को मंडला पूजा में भाग लेने की अनुमति मांगने वाली 10 वर्षीय लड़की की रिट याचिका को खारिज कर दिया, जिसमें सर्वोच्च न्यायालय की एक बड़ी पीठ के समक्ष इस मुद्दे की लंबित प्रकृति पर जोर दिया गया। यह आदेश न्यायमूर्ति अनिल के. नरेंद्रन और न्यायमूर्ति हरिशंकर वी. मेनन की खंडपीठ द्वारा पारित किया गया
在线办理(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证Offer一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(latrobe毕业证书)拉筹伯大学毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Youngest c m in India- Pema Khandu Biography
Pema Khandu, born on August 21, 1979, is an Indian politician and the Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh. He is the son of former Chief Minister of Arunachal Pradesh, Dorjee Khandu. Pema Khandu assumed office as the Chief Minister in July 2016, making him one of the youngest Chief Ministers in India at that time.
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75LUMINATIVE MEDIA/PROJECT COUNSEL MEDIA GROUP
From his beginnings with a daily newspaper, he moved easily through Newsweek magazine to cable news and, later, to the frontiers of online journalism.Recently uploaded (8)
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Snigdha-Sreenath-Minor-v-Travancore-Devaswom-Board-WPCNO-39847-OF-2023-2024-L...
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Howard Fineman, Veteran Political Journalist and TV Pundit, Dies at 75
Shaikh farid notice issued order
- 1. Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010167302021 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5534/2021 KHALEK ALI AND ANR S/O CHALIMUDDIN RESIDENT OF NO. 3 DHALPUR, PS SIPAJHAR, DIST DARRANG, ASSAM 2: AMIR HUSSAIN S/O KHALEK ALI RESIDENT OF NO. 3 DHALPUR PS SIPAJHAR DIST DARRANG ASSAM (EARLIER RESIDENT OF KIRAKARA HAVING SHIFTED TO NO 3 DHALPUR DUE TO WASHING AWAY OF THE VILLAGE KIRAKARAABOUT 5 YEARS BACK VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, HOME AND POLITICAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF ASSAM, 2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DARRANG ASSAM 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE DARRAN Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DUTTA
- 2. Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 25/10/2021 Heard Mr. M Dutta, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. K Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent Nos. 1 to 4. The minor son of the petitioner No. 1 died on 23.09.2021 due to police firing at village No. 3 Dhalpur (Gorukhuti), District-Darrang. Petitioner No. 2 is the other son of the petitioner No. 1 and the brother of the minor deceased. For such death of their minor son/ brother, the petitioners have preferred this writ petition praying amongst others for a direction to the respondents herein to pay necessary compensation to them. Issue notice, returnable by 01.12.2021. As Mr. K Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam has accepted notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 4, no formal notice need to be issued to those respondents. Petitioners shall serve requisite extra copies of this writ petition along with the annexures appended thereto to Mr. K Gogoi, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam by tomorrow, i.e., 26.10.2021, obtaining necessary acknowledgment from him in that regard. List accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant