SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 71
PHMSA Final Rule for Gas Transmission Pipelines
August 2021
PIPELINE INTEGRITY
WEBINAR SERIES:
TODAY’S SPEAKER
Bryan Louque has over 25 years of
experience in the pipeline industry. He
has been involved with the design,
construction, and O&M of pipeline
systems with an emphasis on corrosion
control, pipeline integrity and
regulatory compliance programs on
hazardous liquids (Part 195) and
natural gas (Part 192) pipeline systems.
Bryan Louque, P.E.
Vice President of Asset Integrity and Corrosion
Audubon Companies
Agenda
 When is the Gas Transmission Rule Effective?
 What’s in the Gas Transmission Rule?
 What’s not in the Gas Transmission Rule?
 What’s Next?
 Q&A
WHY AM I HERE?
September 2010 October 2019
WHEN IS THE RULE EFFECTIVE?
Effective Date – July 1, 2020
TICK
TOCK
 March 20, 2020 - Enacted
 May 26, 2021 - Terminated
§ 191, § 192 & § 195 Stay Due to COVID 19
ENFORCEMENT UPDATE
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 191.23 & 191.25 Reporting Safety-Related Conditions
What’s New?
 Clarifies the SRC reporting requirement for pipeline
operational pressures that exceed MAOP (plus buildup)
• Required information
• Reporting timeframes
• Contact information
Key Exceptions
 Gathering Lines
 Distribution lines
 LNG facilities
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The impact is LOW
 Modify O&M manual to reflect reporting requirements
§ 191.23 & 191.25 Reporting Safety-Related Conditions
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.3 Definitions
What’s New?
 Adds definitions for:
• Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA)
• Moderate Consequence Area (MCA)
Key Exceptions
 Traceable, Verifiable and Complete (TVC) definition not
included rule
 Defined in the preamble to the rule
 Examples given
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.3 Definitions (cont.)
Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA)
 A documented analytical procedure based on
• Fracture mechanics principles
• Relevant material properties (mechanical and fracture
resistance properties)
• Operating history, operational environment and in-service
degradation
• Possible failure mechanisms
• Initial and final defect sizes
• Usage of future operating and maintenance
procedures to determine the maximum tolerable
sizes for imperfections based upon the
pipeline segment MAOP
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.3 Definitions (cont.)
Moderate Consequence Area (MCA)
 An onshore area that is within a potential impact radius (PIR),
as defined in § 192.903, containing either
• Five or more buildings intended for human occupancy; or
• A principal, arterial roadway with 4 or more lanes,
including any portion of the paved surface, including
shoulders, of a designated interstate, other freeway, or
expressway (National Highway System).
December 2012
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is MODERATE
 Review ECA process to determine if beneficial to use
 Define pipeline moderate consequence areas
§ 192.3 Definitions
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.7 What documents are incorporated by reference partly or
wholly in this part?
What’s New?
 Incorporated by reference
• ANSI/ASNT ILI-PQ-2005(2010), “In-line Inspection
Personnel Qualification and Certification”
• AGA, Pipeline Research Committee Project
PR-3-805, (R-STRENG)
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
• What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Modify ILI procedures to reflect new requirements
§ 192.7 What documents are incorporated by reference partly or
wholly in this part?
§ 192.9 What requirements apply to gathering lines?
What’s New?
 Specifically exempts gathering lines from the requirements
enacted as part of this rule
Key Exceptions
 192.67 – Materials; Record collection and record maintenance
 192.127 – Pipe Design and § 192.205 - Pipeline Components
 192.619 – MAOP
 192.227 – Qualification of Welders (Type A Only)
 192.517 – Records: Tests
 192.750 – Launcher and receiver safety
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is MODERATE
 Gathering line requirements to be addressed
in future rules
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.9 What requirements apply to gathering lines?
§ 192.18 How to notify PHMSA (New Section)
What’s New?
 Provides contact information to notify PHMSA
• Requires a 90-day advance notification if the operator
intends to employ an alternate integrity assessment
method, analytical method, sampling approach, or
technique (i.e., “other technology”)
• Operator may proceed with the proposed other
technology unless notified otherwise by PHMSA
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Modify O&M manual to reflect new requirements
 Modify IMP to reflect new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.18 How to notify PHMSA (New Section)
§ 192.67 Records: Material Properties (New Section)
What’s New?
 Steel transmission pipelines installed
• After July 1, 2020 - Retain all records for the life of the pipeline
• Prior to July 1, 2020 - Retain any such records for the life of the
pipeline
 Record requirements
• Document the physical characteristics of the steel transmission
pipeline, including diameter, yield, UTS, wall thickness, seam
type, and chemical composition
 Includes all tests, inspections, and attributes required at the time
the pipe was manufactured.
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The impact is MODERATE
 Update record retention practices to reflect new
requirements
 Modify GIS schema to reflect TVC requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.67 Records: Material Properties (New Section)
§ 192.127 Records: Pipe Design (New Section)
What’s New?
 Steel transmission pipelines installed
• After July 1, 2020 - Retain records for the life of the
pipeline
• Prior to July 1, 2020 - Retain any such records for the life of
the pipeline
 External pressure and loads
• 192.103 Pipe Design – General
 Design pressure
• 192.105 Design Formula
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is MODERATE
 Update record retention practices to reflect new
requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.127 Records: Pipe Design (New Section)
§ 192.205 Records: Pipeline Components (New Section)
What’s New?
 Steel transmission pipelines installed
• After July 1, 2020 - Retain records for the life of the
pipeline
• Prior to July 1, 2020 - Retain any such records for the life of
the pipeline
 Valve manufacturing and pressure rating records
 Applies to flanges, fittings, branch connections, extruded
outlets, anchor forgings, and other components where
• SMYS ≥ 40 ksi and Diameter > 2 inches
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is MODERATE
 Update record retention practices to reflect new
requirements
 Modify GIS schema to reflect TVC requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.205 Records: Pipeline Components (New Section)
§ 192.150 Passage of Internal Inspection Devices
What’s New?
 NACE SP0102, In-Line Inspection of Pipelines, incorporated by
reference
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Review and compare NACE SP0102 with existing ILI
procedures
 Modify ILI procedures to reflect new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.150 Passage of Internal Inspection Devices
§ 192.227 Qualification of Welders
What’s New?
 Steel pipelines
• Maintain individual welder qualifications for a minimum of
5 years post construction
• Will also apply to Type A gathering systems
 Effective July 1, 2021
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Update record retention practices to reflect new
requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.227 Qualification of Welders
§ 192.285 Plastic Pipe: Qualifying Persons to Make Joints
What’s New?
 Non-metallic pipelines
• Maintain individual pipeline joining qualifications for a
minimum of 5 years post construction
 Effective July 1, 2021
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Update record retention practices to reflect new
requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.285 Plastic Pipe: Qualifying Persons to Make Joints
§ 192.493 In-Line Inspection of Pipelines (New Section)
What’s New?
 Incorporated by reference
• API 1163, In-Line Inspection Systems Qualification
Standard
• ANSI/ASNT ILI-PQ, In-Line Inspection Personnel
Qualification and Certification
• NACE SP0102, In-Line Inspection of Pipelines
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is MODERATE
 Review and compare standards with existing ILI procedures
 Modify ILI procedures to reflect new requirements
(validation)
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.493 In-Line Inspection of Pipelines (New Section)
§ 192.506 Transmission lines: Spike Hydrostatic Pressure Test
(New Section Added)
What’s New?
 Defines the requirements steel pipeline spike hydrostatic test
• SMYS ≥ 30%
• Test medium = Water
• Test duration = 8 hours min
• Spike test pressure to lesser of 1.5 times MAOP or 100%
SMYS and hold for 15 minutes (within first two hours of
test)
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Review and compare standards with existing hydro
procedures
 Modify hydro procedures to reflect new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.506 Transmission lines: Spike Hydrostatic Pressure Test
(New Section Added)
§ 192.619 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure:
Steel or Plastic Pipelines (Records)
What’s New?
 Steel transmission pipelines installed
• After July 1, 2020 - Retain records for the life of the
pipeline
• Prior to July 1, 2020 - Retain any such records for the life
of the pipeline
 (a)(4) MAOP reconfirmation (§ 192.624) required to address
record retention gaps
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is HIGH
 Identify all pipeline sections where MAOP verification gaps
exists
 Review records for compliance to TVC standard
 Link TVC records to GIS segments
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.619 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure:
Steel or Plastic Pipelines (Records)
§ 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and
Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
What’s New?
 In and of itself, § 192.607 adds no new requirements
• Only required for § 192.619 MAOP re-confirmation
 Defines requirements for verification of steel transmission
pipeline material properties and attributes
• Maintain records for life of pipeline
• Records must be traceable, verifiable, complete (TVC)
• Develop procedure to verify incomplete records via
destructive or non-destructive tests
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and
Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines. (New Section)
What’s New?
 Testing may be performed at opportune times
• Anomaly direct examination
• In Situ evaluations
• Repairs, remediations & maintenance digs
• Excavations associated with replacements or relocations
 Non-destructive and destructive test requirements
• Minimum Yield Strength (SMYS)
• Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS)
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and
Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
What’s New?
 Sampling program for pipeline sections where information is
incomplete
• Populations of common characteristics & age (FAQ-18)
• Tests required per population is 1 per mile or 150 total,
whichever is less
• Prior tests may be utilized
• Unexpected or non-confirmatory results
• Expanded sampling program @ 95% confidence level
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and
Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
What’s New?
 Component material verification
• Required for
◦ Diameter > 2”
◦ SMYS ≥ 42 ksi
◦ Cannot be isolated from pipeline
• Not required for
◦ Compressor, meter & regulator stations
◦ Separators
◦ River crossing headers
◦ MLV’s and valve operator piping
◦ Cross-connection isolation valves
• Verify ANSI pressure ratings
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and
Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
Key Exceptions
 None
What is the Impact?
 The Impact VARIES
 Depends on presence or absence of TVC records
 Develop sampling program for unexpected results
 How many digs are sufficient to comply?
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.619 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure:
Steel or Plastic Pipelines
What’s New?
 MAOP modifications
• Class 1 safety factor raised from 1.1 to 1.25 for pipe
installed after effective date
• Applies to Type A & Type B gathering lines
• MAOP established under§ 192.619 (a)(4) must account for
the material property requirements under § 192.607
• May be required to re-confirm the MAOP of the pipeline
under the new section § 192.624
• Comply with new MAOP record retention requirements
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is MODERATE
 Modify design procedures to reflect new safety factor
requirements
 May be required to reconfirm MAOP due to incomplete TVC
records
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.619 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure:
Steel or Plastic Pipelines
§ 192.624 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation:
Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
What’s New?
 Steel pipeline MAOP reconfirmation required for
• § 192.619(a) MAOP establishment – Incomplete TVC records
and pipeline is located in:
◦ A High Consequence Area (HCA); or
◦ A Class 3 or Class 4 location
• § 192.619(c) MAOP establishment (grandfather clause) - SMYS
≥ 30% and pipeline is located in
◦ A High Consequence Area (HCA); or
◦ A Class 3 or Class 4 location; or
◦ A Moderate Consequence Area (MCA), if piggable
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What’s New?
 MAOP re-confirmation compliance deadlines
• July 1, 2021 - Develop MAOP re-confirmation procedures
• July 3, 2028 - Complete 50% of re-confirmations
• July 2, 2035 – Complete 100% of re-confirmations
• 4 years maximum post pipeline segment category change
or pipeline segment falls into category requiring MAOP
re-confirmation
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.624 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation:
Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
What’s New?
 MAOP re-confirmation methods
• Pressure test and TVC records for diameter, wall thickness,
seam type and grade (Design Calc)
• Pressure reduction – 5 year lookback with safety factor
applied
◦ Highest operating pressure
◦ Low Stress Pipelines - Highest operating pressure
combined with periodic patrol and leak survey
• § 192.632 Engineering Critical Assessment
• Pipe replacement
• Alternative technology
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.624 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation:
Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
Key Exceptions
 None
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is HIGH
 Develop MAOP re-confirmation process
• Review all pipeline records from one end to the other
• For entire pipeline, not just required area
• Update GIS data base
 Verify MAOP re-confirmation methods comply with
allowable methods
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.624 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation:
Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
§ 192.632 Engineering Critical Assessment for Maximum Allowable
Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation:
Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
What’s New?
 New MAOP confirmation method - ECA
• Conservative assumptions used for missing TVC values
• Analyze & determine defect predicted failure pressure
• MAOP is determined by lowest predicted failure pressure
with safety factor applied
Key Exceptions
 None
 “Path” to utilize where hydro records are incomplete
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 Identify any segments that require cyclic fatigue or crack /
crack like defect threat analysis.
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.632 Engineering Critical Assessment for Maximum Allowable
Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation:
Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
§ 192.710 Transmission lines: Assessments Outside of High
Consequence Areas (New Section)
What’s New?
 Assessment outside HCA’s where:
• SMYS ≥ 30%
• Class 3 or Class 4 areas
• MCA, if piggable
 Deadline - July 3, 2034 or 10 years post segment categorization
 Reassessment interval – 10 years
 Methods - ILI, hydro, spike hydro, direct examination,
DA, and GWUT
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is HIGH
 Modify O&M to reflect new requirements (Not part of
Subpart O)
 Define pipeline moderate consequence areas
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.710 Transmission lines: Assessments Outside of High
Consequence Areas (New Section)
§ 192.712 Analysis of Predicted Failures (New Section)
What’s New?
 Defect failure pressure analysis
• Corrosion - ASME/ANSI B31G or R-STRENG
• Cracks and Crack Like Defects - Models
 Crack growth models
• TVC records include CVN data (§ 192.607)
• Defect stability
• Remaining life
• Precision / accuracy of assessment data
• Conservative assumptions until assessed
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is MEDIUM
 Determine susceptibility to cracks and crack like defects
 Modify O&M procedures to incorporate new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.712 Analysis of Predicted Failures (New Section)
§ 192.750 Launcher and Receiver Safety (New Section)
What’s New?
 July 1, 2021 – Launchers and receivers equipped with pressure
relief device
Key Exceptions
 None
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Verify all ILI launchers and receivers comply with new safety
standards
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.909 How Can an Operator Change its Integrity
Management Program?
What’s New?
 Revised to reference PHMSA notification requirements under
the new section § 192.18
Key Exceptions
 None
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.917 How Does an Operator Identify Potential Threats to Pipeline
Integrity and Use the Threat Identification in its Integrity Program?
What’s New?
 Seismicity, geology and soil stability
 Emphasis
 Cyclic fatigue analysis (7 year interval)
 Manufacturing defect stability
 Prove it by pressure test
 ERW pipe section reference § 192.712 (Failure Pressure
Analysis)
 Cracks and crack like defects (New Section)
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is MODERATE
 Document why some threats are not or have not been
considered
 Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.917 How Does an Operator Identify Potential Threats to Pipeline
Integrity and Use the Threat Identification in its Integrity Program?
§ 192.921 How is the Baseline Assessment to be Conducted?
What’s New?
 ILI assessment requirements
 New section
 Assessments Added
 Spike hydro pressure test
 Excavation and in-situ
 Guided wave
 MAOP re-confirmation
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is MODERATE
 Review IMP with regard to manufacturing defects, time
dependent threats, cyclic fatigue threats, and crack & crack
like defect threats
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.921 How is the Baseline Assessment to be Conducted?
§ 192.935 What Additional Preventive and Mitigative Measures
Must an Operator Take?
What’s New?
 Outside force damage
 Emphasis
 Includes loading, longitudinal / lateral forces and seismicity of
the area
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements
 Modify risk model to reflect new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.935 What Additional Preventive and Mitigative Measures
Must an Operator Take?
§ 192.937 What is a Continual Process of Evaluation and
Assessment to Maintain a Pipeline's Integrity?
What’s New?
 Aligned with Threats (§ 192.917)
 Assessments Added
• Excavation and in-situ
• Guided wave
• MAOP re-confirmation
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.937 What is a Continual Process of Evaluation and
Assessment to Maintain a Pipeline's Integrity?
§ 192.939 What are the Required Reassessment Intervals?
What’s New?
 Revised to reference PHMSA notification requirements under
the new section § 192.18
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ 192.939 What are the Required Reassessment Intervals?
§ 192.949 How does an Operator Notify PHMSA [Removed and
Reserved]
What’s New?
 Removed and replaced with new section § 192.18
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements
§ 192.949 How does an Operator Notify PHMSA [Removed and
Reserved]
§ Appendix F to Part 192–Criteria for Conducting Integrity Assessments
Using Guided Wave Ultrasonic Testing (GWUT) (New Section)
What’s New?
 Added Appendix F for GWUT assessment
Key Exceptions
 None
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
What is the Impact?
 The Impact is LOW
 No longer an alternative technology that requires approval
 Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements
WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
§ Appendix F to Part 192–Criteria for Conducting Integrity Assessments
Using Guided Wave Ultrasonic Testing (GWUT) (New Section)
Future Rules: The Rule does not include many changes to Parts 191
and 192 that PHMSA proposed at earlier points in the proceedings
and will be included in future rules:
WHAT’S NOT IN THE RULE?
Mega Rule Part 2:
 Repair criteria in HCAs
 Creation of new repair criteria for non-HCAs
 Requirements for inspecting pipelines following extreme events
 Updates to pipeline corrosion control requirements
 Codification of a management of change process
 Clarification of certain other IMP requirements
 Strengthening IMP assessment requirements
Mega Rule Part 3:
Requirements related to gas gathering lines that
were proposed in the NPRM
WHAT’S NOT IN THE RULE?
Future Rules: The Rule does not include many changes to Parts 191 and
192 that PHMSA proposed at earlier points in the proceedings and will
be included in future rules:
Bryan Louque, P.E.
Vice President, Asset Integrity & Corrosion
D: 918.514.5879 C: 913.221.3446
blouque@auduboncompanies.com
auduboncompanies.com
Any Questions?
Webinar recording and presentation
will be emailed in 24-48 hours

More Related Content

What's hot

Cathodic Protection for Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGSTs)
Cathodic Protection for Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGSTs) Cathodic Protection for Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGSTs)
Cathodic Protection for Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGSTs) Audubon Engineering Company
 
Risk Assessment Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity
Risk Assessment Hazardous Liquid Pipeline IntegrityRisk Assessment Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity
Risk Assessment Hazardous Liquid Pipeline IntegrityAudubon Engineering Company
 
INGAA TVC Presentation
INGAA TVC PresentationINGAA TVC Presentation
INGAA TVC PresentationMTS Webmaster
 
Direct Assessment ECDA Program Development
Direct Assessment ECDA Program DevelopmentDirect Assessment ECDA Program Development
Direct Assessment ECDA Program DevelopmentMTS Webmaster
 
The Importance of Risk Management in the Pipeline Industry
The Importance of Risk Management in the Pipeline IndustryThe Importance of Risk Management in the Pipeline Industry
The Importance of Risk Management in the Pipeline IndustryAudubon Engineering Company
 
SCT an Advanced Pipeline Integrity Solution
SCT an Advanced Pipeline Integrity SolutionSCT an Advanced Pipeline Integrity Solution
SCT an Advanced Pipeline Integrity SolutionBrett Payton
 
2. FDR-RAE Int Training 2015 - Pipeline Integrity - Copy
2. FDR-RAE Int Training 2015 - Pipeline Integrity - Copy2. FDR-RAE Int Training 2015 - Pipeline Integrity - Copy
2. FDR-RAE Int Training 2015 - Pipeline Integrity - CopyFranklin Del Rosario, P.Eng.
 
Jim Reed - The Gas Co. - Pipeline Safety In A Post San Bruno Era
Jim Reed - The Gas Co. - Pipeline Safety In A Post San Bruno EraJim Reed - The Gas Co. - Pipeline Safety In A Post San Bruno Era
Jim Reed - The Gas Co. - Pipeline Safety In A Post San Bruno EraContract Cities
 
Understanding Underground Storage Tanks
Understanding Underground Storage Tanks   Understanding Underground Storage Tanks
Understanding Underground Storage Tanks KPADealerWebinars
 
110921 commissioning of offshore installations
110921 commissioning of offshore installations110921 commissioning of offshore installations
110921 commissioning of offshore installationslaithu2908
 
2012 FEPA Presentation: Charlie Hall
2012 FEPA Presentation: Charlie Hall2012 FEPA Presentation: Charlie Hall
2012 FEPA Presentation: Charlie HallFloridaPipeTalk
 
Final well control rule (blowout preventer and well control operations)
Final well control rule (blowout preventer and well control operations)Final well control rule (blowout preventer and well control operations)
Final well control rule (blowout preventer and well control operations)Dr Dev Kambhampati
 
Commissioning of Offshore Installations
Commissioning of Offshore InstallationsCommissioning of Offshore Installations
Commissioning of Offshore Installationswan saiful arini
 
National Oilwell Varco Drilling Automation and Optimization 2017 03 03
National Oilwell Varco Drilling Automation and Optimization 2017 03 03National Oilwell Varco Drilling Automation and Optimization 2017 03 03
National Oilwell Varco Drilling Automation and Optimization 2017 03 03Javan Meinwald, MBA, MS
 
Heather Peters, Missouri DNR, Proposed Underground Storage Tank Rule Changes,...
Heather Peters, Missouri DNR, Proposed Underground Storage Tank Rule Changes,...Heather Peters, Missouri DNR, Proposed Underground Storage Tank Rule Changes,...
Heather Peters, Missouri DNR, Proposed Underground Storage Tank Rule Changes,...Kevin Perry
 
Download-manuals-ground water-manual-gw-volume4fieldmanualgeo-hydrologypartvii
 Download-manuals-ground water-manual-gw-volume4fieldmanualgeo-hydrologypartvii Download-manuals-ground water-manual-gw-volume4fieldmanualgeo-hydrologypartvii
Download-manuals-ground water-manual-gw-volume4fieldmanualgeo-hydrologypartviihydrologyproject001
 

What's hot (20)

AI&C Facility Underground Piping Program
AI&C Facility Underground Piping ProgramAI&C Facility Underground Piping Program
AI&C Facility Underground Piping Program
 
Cathodic Protection for Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGSTs)
Cathodic Protection for Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGSTs) Cathodic Protection for Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGSTs)
Cathodic Protection for Above Ground Storage Tanks (AGSTs)
 
Risk Assessment Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity
Risk Assessment Hazardous Liquid Pipeline IntegrityRisk Assessment Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity
Risk Assessment Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Integrity
 
INGAA TVC Presentation
INGAA TVC PresentationINGAA TVC Presentation
INGAA TVC Presentation
 
AC Interference Analysis and Mitigation
AC Interference Analysis and MitigationAC Interference Analysis and Mitigation
AC Interference Analysis and Mitigation
 
Pipeline integrity documentation
Pipeline integrity documentationPipeline integrity documentation
Pipeline integrity documentation
 
Direct Assessment ECDA Program Development
Direct Assessment ECDA Program DevelopmentDirect Assessment ECDA Program Development
Direct Assessment ECDA Program Development
 
The Importance of Risk Management in the Pipeline Industry
The Importance of Risk Management in the Pipeline IndustryThe Importance of Risk Management in the Pipeline Industry
The Importance of Risk Management in the Pipeline Industry
 
SCT an Advanced Pipeline Integrity Solution
SCT an Advanced Pipeline Integrity SolutionSCT an Advanced Pipeline Integrity Solution
SCT an Advanced Pipeline Integrity Solution
 
2. FDR-RAE Int Training 2015 - Pipeline Integrity - Copy
2. FDR-RAE Int Training 2015 - Pipeline Integrity - Copy2. FDR-RAE Int Training 2015 - Pipeline Integrity - Copy
2. FDR-RAE Int Training 2015 - Pipeline Integrity - Copy
 
Jim Reed - The Gas Co. - Pipeline Safety In A Post San Bruno Era
Jim Reed - The Gas Co. - Pipeline Safety In A Post San Bruno EraJim Reed - The Gas Co. - Pipeline Safety In A Post San Bruno Era
Jim Reed - The Gas Co. - Pipeline Safety In A Post San Bruno Era
 
ANSI C12.20 and Proposed Field Testing Changes
ANSI C12.20 and Proposed Field Testing ChangesANSI C12.20 and Proposed Field Testing Changes
ANSI C12.20 and Proposed Field Testing Changes
 
Understanding Underground Storage Tanks
Understanding Underground Storage Tanks   Understanding Underground Storage Tanks
Understanding Underground Storage Tanks
 
110921 commissioning of offshore installations
110921 commissioning of offshore installations110921 commissioning of offshore installations
110921 commissioning of offshore installations
 
2012 FEPA Presentation: Charlie Hall
2012 FEPA Presentation: Charlie Hall2012 FEPA Presentation: Charlie Hall
2012 FEPA Presentation: Charlie Hall
 
Final well control rule (blowout preventer and well control operations)
Final well control rule (blowout preventer and well control operations)Final well control rule (blowout preventer and well control operations)
Final well control rule (blowout preventer and well control operations)
 
Commissioning of Offshore Installations
Commissioning of Offshore InstallationsCommissioning of Offshore Installations
Commissioning of Offshore Installations
 
National Oilwell Varco Drilling Automation and Optimization 2017 03 03
National Oilwell Varco Drilling Automation and Optimization 2017 03 03National Oilwell Varco Drilling Automation and Optimization 2017 03 03
National Oilwell Varco Drilling Automation and Optimization 2017 03 03
 
Heather Peters, Missouri DNR, Proposed Underground Storage Tank Rule Changes,...
Heather Peters, Missouri DNR, Proposed Underground Storage Tank Rule Changes,...Heather Peters, Missouri DNR, Proposed Underground Storage Tank Rule Changes,...
Heather Peters, Missouri DNR, Proposed Underground Storage Tank Rule Changes,...
 
Download-manuals-ground water-manual-gw-volume4fieldmanualgeo-hydrologypartvii
 Download-manuals-ground water-manual-gw-volume4fieldmanualgeo-hydrologypartvii Download-manuals-ground water-manual-gw-volume4fieldmanualgeo-hydrologypartvii
Download-manuals-ground water-manual-gw-volume4fieldmanualgeo-hydrologypartvii
 

Similar to PHMSA Final Rule (part 1) for Gas Transmission Pipelines

AFS PHMSA Final Rule Part 2 (GG) and Part 3 (CCC) Central Area Conference
AFS PHMSA Final Rule Part 2 (GG) and Part 3 (CCC) Central Area ConferenceAFS PHMSA Final Rule Part 2 (GG) and Part 3 (CCC) Central Area Conference
AFS PHMSA Final Rule Part 2 (GG) and Part 3 (CCC) Central Area ConferenceAudubon Engineering Company
 
New Rulemakings: What Can We Expect - Gary Krichau
New Rulemakings: What Can We Expect - Gary KrichauNew Rulemakings: What Can We Expect - Gary Krichau
New Rulemakings: What Can We Expect - Gary Krichaunacetwincities
 
PHMSA: Safety of Gas Transmission & Gathering Pipelines Summary
PHMSA: Safety of Gas Transmission & Gathering Pipelines SummaryPHMSA: Safety of Gas Transmission & Gathering Pipelines Summary
PHMSA: Safety of Gas Transmission & Gathering Pipelines SummaryProject Consulting Services, Inc.
 
Babst Calland Bulletin on Proposed PHMSA Change in Pipeline Regulations for N...
Babst Calland Bulletin on Proposed PHMSA Change in Pipeline Regulations for N...Babst Calland Bulletin on Proposed PHMSA Change in Pipeline Regulations for N...
Babst Calland Bulletin on Proposed PHMSA Change in Pipeline Regulations for N...Marcellus Drilling News
 
Developments Under the Clean Air Act Implications and Ramifications
Developments Under the Clean Air Act  Implications and RamificationsDevelopments Under the Clean Air Act  Implications and Ramifications
Developments Under the Clean Air Act Implications and RamificationsQuarles & Brady
 
ASHRAE 90 1 The Big Picture
ASHRAE 90 1 The Big PictureASHRAE 90 1 The Big Picture
ASHRAE 90 1 The Big PictureASHRAE Region VI
 
Willbros - Summary: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Willbros - Summary: Advanced Notice of Proposed RulemakingWillbros - Summary: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Willbros - Summary: Advanced Notice of Proposed RulemakingWillbros Group, Inc.
 
BlueScape Air Quality in 2015: What You Need to Know Webinar 2-10-15
BlueScape Air Quality in 2015: What You Need to Know Webinar 2-10-15BlueScape Air Quality in 2015: What You Need to Know Webinar 2-10-15
BlueScape Air Quality in 2015: What You Need to Know Webinar 2-10-15BlueScape
 
Requirements for Continuous Emissions Monitoring. Proposed Amended Rules (PAR...
Requirements for Continuous Emissions Monitoring. Proposed Amended Rules (PAR...Requirements for Continuous Emissions Monitoring. Proposed Amended Rules (PAR...
Requirements for Continuous Emissions Monitoring. Proposed Amended Rules (PAR...GeneAmnuel
 
The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...
The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...
The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...All4 Inc.
 
INSPECTION OF PRESSURE VESSELS TO ASME Section VIII Div. 1.pdf
INSPECTION OF PRESSURE VESSELS TO ASME Section VIII Div. 1.pdfINSPECTION OF PRESSURE VESSELS TO ASME Section VIII Div. 1.pdf
INSPECTION OF PRESSURE VESSELS TO ASME Section VIII Div. 1.pdfTeddy Setiady
 
Inspection of Pressure Vessels as per ASME Sec VIII Division -1
Inspection of Pressure Vessels as per ASME Sec VIII Division -1Inspection of Pressure Vessels as per ASME Sec VIII Division -1
Inspection of Pressure Vessels as per ASME Sec VIII Division -1Gaurav Singh Rajput
 
Pip arc01015(architechtural & building utilities design criteria)
Pip arc01015(architechtural & building utilities design criteria)Pip arc01015(architechtural & building utilities design criteria)
Pip arc01015(architechtural & building utilities design criteria)Muhammad Hassan
 
MRM-16 (2020).pptx
MRM-16 (2020).pptxMRM-16 (2020).pptx
MRM-16 (2020).pptxxego1
 

Similar to PHMSA Final Rule (part 1) for Gas Transmission Pipelines (20)

AFS PHMSA Final Rule Part 2 (GG) and Part 3 (CCC) Central Area Conference
AFS PHMSA Final Rule Part 2 (GG) and Part 3 (CCC) Central Area ConferenceAFS PHMSA Final Rule Part 2 (GG) and Part 3 (CCC) Central Area Conference
AFS PHMSA Final Rule Part 2 (GG) and Part 3 (CCC) Central Area Conference
 
New Rulemakings: What Can We Expect - Gary Krichau
New Rulemakings: What Can We Expect - Gary KrichauNew Rulemakings: What Can We Expect - Gary Krichau
New Rulemakings: What Can We Expect - Gary Krichau
 
PHMSA: Safety of Gas Transmission & Gathering Pipelines Summary
PHMSA: Safety of Gas Transmission & Gathering Pipelines SummaryPHMSA: Safety of Gas Transmission & Gathering Pipelines Summary
PHMSA: Safety of Gas Transmission & Gathering Pipelines Summary
 
Is 1343 2012
Is 1343   2012Is 1343   2012
Is 1343 2012
 
ANSI Testing
ANSI TestingANSI Testing
ANSI Testing
 
Babst Calland Bulletin on Proposed PHMSA Change in Pipeline Regulations for N...
Babst Calland Bulletin on Proposed PHMSA Change in Pipeline Regulations for N...Babst Calland Bulletin on Proposed PHMSA Change in Pipeline Regulations for N...
Babst Calland Bulletin on Proposed PHMSA Change in Pipeline Regulations for N...
 
Developments Under the Clean Air Act Implications and Ramifications
Developments Under the Clean Air Act  Implications and RamificationsDevelopments Under the Clean Air Act  Implications and Ramifications
Developments Under the Clean Air Act Implications and Ramifications
 
ANSI Standards & Updates
ANSI Standards & UpdatesANSI Standards & Updates
ANSI Standards & Updates
 
ASHRAE 90 1 The Big Picture
ASHRAE 90 1 The Big PictureASHRAE 90 1 The Big Picture
ASHRAE 90 1 The Big Picture
 
Willbros - Summary: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Willbros - Summary: Advanced Notice of Proposed RulemakingWillbros - Summary: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Willbros - Summary: Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
 
CalAPA statewide technical webinar presentations
CalAPA statewide technical webinar presentationsCalAPA statewide technical webinar presentations
CalAPA statewide technical webinar presentations
 
BlueScape Air Quality in 2015: What You Need to Know Webinar 2-10-15
BlueScape Air Quality in 2015: What You Need to Know Webinar 2-10-15BlueScape Air Quality in 2015: What You Need to Know Webinar 2-10-15
BlueScape Air Quality in 2015: What You Need to Know Webinar 2-10-15
 
Requirements for Continuous Emissions Monitoring. Proposed Amended Rules (PAR...
Requirements for Continuous Emissions Monitoring. Proposed Amended Rules (PAR...Requirements for Continuous Emissions Monitoring. Proposed Amended Rules (PAR...
Requirements for Continuous Emissions Monitoring. Proposed Amended Rules (PAR...
 
The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...
The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...
The Petroleum Refinery Sector Rule: What’s all the fuss about and what are th...
 
S2011-6.pdf
S2011-6.pdfS2011-6.pdf
S2011-6.pdf
 
INSPECTION OF PRESSURE VESSELS TO ASME Section VIII Div. 1.pdf
INSPECTION OF PRESSURE VESSELS TO ASME Section VIII Div. 1.pdfINSPECTION OF PRESSURE VESSELS TO ASME Section VIII Div. 1.pdf
INSPECTION OF PRESSURE VESSELS TO ASME Section VIII Div. 1.pdf
 
Inspection of Pressure Vessels as per ASME Sec VIII Division -1
Inspection of Pressure Vessels as per ASME Sec VIII Division -1Inspection of Pressure Vessels as per ASME Sec VIII Division -1
Inspection of Pressure Vessels as per ASME Sec VIII Division -1
 
Pip arc01015(architechtural & building utilities design criteria)
Pip arc01015(architechtural & building utilities design criteria)Pip arc01015(architechtural & building utilities design criteria)
Pip arc01015(architechtural & building utilities design criteria)
 
MRM-16 (2020).pptx
MRM-16 (2020).pptxMRM-16 (2020).pptx
MRM-16 (2020).pptx
 
Presentation on SECVIII
Presentation on SECVIIIPresentation on SECVIII
Presentation on SECVIII
 

Recently uploaded

An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...Chandu841456
 
Effects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixingEffects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixingviprabot1
 
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
pipeline in computer architecture design
pipeline in computer architecture  designpipeline in computer architecture  design
pipeline in computer architecture designssuser87fa0c1
 
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvvWork Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvvLewisJB
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)Dr SOUNDIRARAJ N
 
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptx
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptxConcrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptx
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptxKartikeyaDwivedi3
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdfElectronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdfme23b1001
 
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.pptArduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.pptSAURABHKUMAR892774
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxbritheesh05
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile servicerehmti665
 
Gurgaon ✡️9711147426✨Call In girls Gurgaon Sector 51 escort service
Gurgaon ✡️9711147426✨Call In girls Gurgaon Sector 51 escort serviceGurgaon ✡️9711147426✨Call In girls Gurgaon Sector 51 escort service
Gurgaon ✡️9711147426✨Call In girls Gurgaon Sector 51 escort servicejennyeacort
 
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 

Recently uploaded (20)

An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
An experimental study in using natural admixture as an alternative for chemic...
 
Effects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixingEffects of rheological properties on mixing
Effects of rheological properties on mixing
 
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
 
pipeline in computer architecture design
pipeline in computer architecture  designpipeline in computer architecture  design
pipeline in computer architecture design
 
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
 
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvvWork Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
Work Experience-Dalton Park.pptxfvvvvvvv
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning Unit II Notes with Question bank .pdf
 
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
UNIT III ANALOG ELECTRONICS (BASIC ELECTRONICS)
 
Call Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCR
Call Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCRCall Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCR
Call Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCR
 
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptx
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptxConcrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptx
Concrete Mix Design - IS 10262-2019 - .pptx
 
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Network & Deep Learning UNIT III notes and Question bank .pdf
 
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdfElectronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
 
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.pptArduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
Arduino_CSE ece ppt for working and principal of arduino.ppt
 
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptxArtificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
Artificial-Intelligence-in-Electronics (K).pptx
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
 
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Serviceyoung call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
young call girls in Green Park🔝 9953056974 🔝 escort Service
 
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
9953056974 Call Girls In South Ex, Escorts (Delhi) NCR.pdf
 
Gurgaon ✡️9711147426✨Call In girls Gurgaon Sector 51 escort service
Gurgaon ✡️9711147426✨Call In girls Gurgaon Sector 51 escort serviceGurgaon ✡️9711147426✨Call In girls Gurgaon Sector 51 escort service
Gurgaon ✡️9711147426✨Call In girls Gurgaon Sector 51 escort service
 
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ - Planetary Defender on NASA's Double Asteroid Redirec...
 
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Serviceyoung call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Rajiv Chowk🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
 

PHMSA Final Rule (part 1) for Gas Transmission Pipelines

  • 1. PHMSA Final Rule for Gas Transmission Pipelines August 2021 PIPELINE INTEGRITY WEBINAR SERIES:
  • 2. TODAY’S SPEAKER Bryan Louque has over 25 years of experience in the pipeline industry. He has been involved with the design, construction, and O&M of pipeline systems with an emphasis on corrosion control, pipeline integrity and regulatory compliance programs on hazardous liquids (Part 195) and natural gas (Part 192) pipeline systems. Bryan Louque, P.E. Vice President of Asset Integrity and Corrosion Audubon Companies
  • 3. Agenda  When is the Gas Transmission Rule Effective?  What’s in the Gas Transmission Rule?  What’s not in the Gas Transmission Rule?  What’s Next?  Q&A WHY AM I HERE? September 2010 October 2019
  • 4. WHEN IS THE RULE EFFECTIVE? Effective Date – July 1, 2020 TICK TOCK
  • 5.  March 20, 2020 - Enacted  May 26, 2021 - Terminated § 191, § 192 & § 195 Stay Due to COVID 19 ENFORCEMENT UPDATE
  • 6. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 191.23 & 191.25 Reporting Safety-Related Conditions What’s New?  Clarifies the SRC reporting requirement for pipeline operational pressures that exceed MAOP (plus buildup) • Required information • Reporting timeframes • Contact information Key Exceptions  Gathering Lines  Distribution lines  LNG facilities
  • 7. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? What is the Impact?  The impact is LOW  Modify O&M manual to reflect reporting requirements § 191.23 & 191.25 Reporting Safety-Related Conditions
  • 8. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.3 Definitions What’s New?  Adds definitions for: • Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA) • Moderate Consequence Area (MCA) Key Exceptions  Traceable, Verifiable and Complete (TVC) definition not included rule  Defined in the preamble to the rule  Examples given
  • 9. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.3 Definitions (cont.) Engineering Critical Assessment (ECA)  A documented analytical procedure based on • Fracture mechanics principles • Relevant material properties (mechanical and fracture resistance properties) • Operating history, operational environment and in-service degradation • Possible failure mechanisms • Initial and final defect sizes • Usage of future operating and maintenance procedures to determine the maximum tolerable sizes for imperfections based upon the pipeline segment MAOP
  • 10. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.3 Definitions (cont.) Moderate Consequence Area (MCA)  An onshore area that is within a potential impact radius (PIR), as defined in § 192.903, containing either • Five or more buildings intended for human occupancy; or • A principal, arterial roadway with 4 or more lanes, including any portion of the paved surface, including shoulders, of a designated interstate, other freeway, or expressway (National Highway System). December 2012
  • 11. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? What is the Impact?  The Impact is MODERATE  Review ECA process to determine if beneficial to use  Define pipeline moderate consequence areas § 192.3 Definitions
  • 12. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.7 What documents are incorporated by reference partly or wholly in this part? What’s New?  Incorporated by reference • ANSI/ASNT ILI-PQ-2005(2010), “In-line Inspection Personnel Qualification and Certification” • AGA, Pipeline Research Committee Project PR-3-805, (R-STRENG) Key Exceptions  None
  • 13. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? • What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Modify ILI procedures to reflect new requirements § 192.7 What documents are incorporated by reference partly or wholly in this part?
  • 14. § 192.9 What requirements apply to gathering lines? What’s New?  Specifically exempts gathering lines from the requirements enacted as part of this rule Key Exceptions  192.67 – Materials; Record collection and record maintenance  192.127 – Pipe Design and § 192.205 - Pipeline Components  192.619 – MAOP  192.227 – Qualification of Welders (Type A Only)  192.517 – Records: Tests  192.750 – Launcher and receiver safety WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 15. What is the Impact?  The Impact is MODERATE  Gathering line requirements to be addressed in future rules WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.9 What requirements apply to gathering lines?
  • 16. § 192.18 How to notify PHMSA (New Section) What’s New?  Provides contact information to notify PHMSA • Requires a 90-day advance notification if the operator intends to employ an alternate integrity assessment method, analytical method, sampling approach, or technique (i.e., “other technology”) • Operator may proceed with the proposed other technology unless notified otherwise by PHMSA Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 17. What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Modify O&M manual to reflect new requirements  Modify IMP to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.18 How to notify PHMSA (New Section)
  • 18. § 192.67 Records: Material Properties (New Section) What’s New?  Steel transmission pipelines installed • After July 1, 2020 - Retain all records for the life of the pipeline • Prior to July 1, 2020 - Retain any such records for the life of the pipeline  Record requirements • Document the physical characteristics of the steel transmission pipeline, including diameter, yield, UTS, wall thickness, seam type, and chemical composition  Includes all tests, inspections, and attributes required at the time the pipe was manufactured. Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 19. What is the Impact?  The impact is MODERATE  Update record retention practices to reflect new requirements  Modify GIS schema to reflect TVC requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.67 Records: Material Properties (New Section)
  • 20. § 192.127 Records: Pipe Design (New Section) What’s New?  Steel transmission pipelines installed • After July 1, 2020 - Retain records for the life of the pipeline • Prior to July 1, 2020 - Retain any such records for the life of the pipeline  External pressure and loads • 192.103 Pipe Design – General  Design pressure • 192.105 Design Formula Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 21. What is the Impact?  The Impact is MODERATE  Update record retention practices to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.127 Records: Pipe Design (New Section)
  • 22. § 192.205 Records: Pipeline Components (New Section) What’s New?  Steel transmission pipelines installed • After July 1, 2020 - Retain records for the life of the pipeline • Prior to July 1, 2020 - Retain any such records for the life of the pipeline  Valve manufacturing and pressure rating records  Applies to flanges, fittings, branch connections, extruded outlets, anchor forgings, and other components where • SMYS ≥ 40 ksi and Diameter > 2 inches Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 23. What is the Impact?  The Impact is MODERATE  Update record retention practices to reflect new requirements  Modify GIS schema to reflect TVC requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.205 Records: Pipeline Components (New Section)
  • 24. § 192.150 Passage of Internal Inspection Devices What’s New?  NACE SP0102, In-Line Inspection of Pipelines, incorporated by reference Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 25. What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Review and compare NACE SP0102 with existing ILI procedures  Modify ILI procedures to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.150 Passage of Internal Inspection Devices
  • 26. § 192.227 Qualification of Welders What’s New?  Steel pipelines • Maintain individual welder qualifications for a minimum of 5 years post construction • Will also apply to Type A gathering systems  Effective July 1, 2021 Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 27. What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Update record retention practices to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.227 Qualification of Welders
  • 28. § 192.285 Plastic Pipe: Qualifying Persons to Make Joints What’s New?  Non-metallic pipelines • Maintain individual pipeline joining qualifications for a minimum of 5 years post construction  Effective July 1, 2021 Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 29. What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Update record retention practices to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.285 Plastic Pipe: Qualifying Persons to Make Joints
  • 30. § 192.493 In-Line Inspection of Pipelines (New Section) What’s New?  Incorporated by reference • API 1163, In-Line Inspection Systems Qualification Standard • ANSI/ASNT ILI-PQ, In-Line Inspection Personnel Qualification and Certification • NACE SP0102, In-Line Inspection of Pipelines Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 31. What is the Impact?  The Impact is MODERATE  Review and compare standards with existing ILI procedures  Modify ILI procedures to reflect new requirements (validation) WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.493 In-Line Inspection of Pipelines (New Section)
  • 32. § 192.506 Transmission lines: Spike Hydrostatic Pressure Test (New Section Added) What’s New?  Defines the requirements steel pipeline spike hydrostatic test • SMYS ≥ 30% • Test medium = Water • Test duration = 8 hours min • Spike test pressure to lesser of 1.5 times MAOP or 100% SMYS and hold for 15 minutes (within first two hours of test) Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 33. What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Review and compare standards with existing hydro procedures  Modify hydro procedures to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.506 Transmission lines: Spike Hydrostatic Pressure Test (New Section Added)
  • 34. § 192.619 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure: Steel or Plastic Pipelines (Records) What’s New?  Steel transmission pipelines installed • After July 1, 2020 - Retain records for the life of the pipeline • Prior to July 1, 2020 - Retain any such records for the life of the pipeline  (a)(4) MAOP reconfirmation (§ 192.624) required to address record retention gaps Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 35. What is the Impact?  The Impact is HIGH  Identify all pipeline sections where MAOP verification gaps exists  Review records for compliance to TVC standard  Link TVC records to GIS segments WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.619 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure: Steel or Plastic Pipelines (Records)
  • 36. § 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section) What’s New?  In and of itself, § 192.607 adds no new requirements • Only required for § 192.619 MAOP re-confirmation  Defines requirements for verification of steel transmission pipeline material properties and attributes • Maintain records for life of pipeline • Records must be traceable, verifiable, complete (TVC) • Develop procedure to verify incomplete records via destructive or non-destructive tests WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 37. § 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines. (New Section) What’s New?  Testing may be performed at opportune times • Anomaly direct examination • In Situ evaluations • Repairs, remediations & maintenance digs • Excavations associated with replacements or relocations  Non-destructive and destructive test requirements • Minimum Yield Strength (SMYS) • Ultimate Tensile Strength (UTS) WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 38. § 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section) What’s New?  Sampling program for pipeline sections where information is incomplete • Populations of common characteristics & age (FAQ-18) • Tests required per population is 1 per mile or 150 total, whichever is less • Prior tests may be utilized • Unexpected or non-confirmatory results • Expanded sampling program @ 95% confidence level WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 39. § 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section) What’s New?  Component material verification • Required for ◦ Diameter > 2” ◦ SMYS ≥ 42 ksi ◦ Cannot be isolated from pipeline • Not required for ◦ Compressor, meter & regulator stations ◦ Separators ◦ River crossing headers ◦ MLV’s and valve operator piping ◦ Cross-connection isolation valves • Verify ANSI pressure ratings WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 40. § 192.607 Verification of Pipeline Material Properties and Attributes: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section) Key Exceptions  None What is the Impact?  The Impact VARIES  Depends on presence or absence of TVC records  Develop sampling program for unexpected results  How many digs are sufficient to comply? WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 41. § 192.619 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure: Steel or Plastic Pipelines What’s New?  MAOP modifications • Class 1 safety factor raised from 1.1 to 1.25 for pipe installed after effective date • Applies to Type A & Type B gathering lines • MAOP established under§ 192.619 (a)(4) must account for the material property requirements under § 192.607 • May be required to re-confirm the MAOP of the pipeline under the new section § 192.624 • Comply with new MAOP record retention requirements Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 42. What is the Impact?  The Impact is MODERATE  Modify design procedures to reflect new safety factor requirements  May be required to reconfirm MAOP due to incomplete TVC records WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.619 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure: Steel or Plastic Pipelines
  • 43. § 192.624 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section) What’s New?  Steel pipeline MAOP reconfirmation required for • § 192.619(a) MAOP establishment – Incomplete TVC records and pipeline is located in: ◦ A High Consequence Area (HCA); or ◦ A Class 3 or Class 4 location • § 192.619(c) MAOP establishment (grandfather clause) - SMYS ≥ 30% and pipeline is located in ◦ A High Consequence Area (HCA); or ◦ A Class 3 or Class 4 location; or ◦ A Moderate Consequence Area (MCA), if piggable WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 44. What’s New?  MAOP re-confirmation compliance deadlines • July 1, 2021 - Develop MAOP re-confirmation procedures • July 3, 2028 - Complete 50% of re-confirmations • July 2, 2035 – Complete 100% of re-confirmations • 4 years maximum post pipeline segment category change or pipeline segment falls into category requiring MAOP re-confirmation WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.624 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
  • 45. What’s New?  MAOP re-confirmation methods • Pressure test and TVC records for diameter, wall thickness, seam type and grade (Design Calc) • Pressure reduction – 5 year lookback with safety factor applied ◦ Highest operating pressure ◦ Low Stress Pipelines - Highest operating pressure combined with periodic patrol and leak survey • § 192.632 Engineering Critical Assessment • Pipe replacement • Alternative technology WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.624 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
  • 46. Key Exceptions  None What is the Impact?  The Impact is HIGH  Develop MAOP re-confirmation process • Review all pipeline records from one end to the other • For entire pipeline, not just required area • Update GIS data base  Verify MAOP re-confirmation methods comply with allowable methods WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.624 Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
  • 47. § 192.632 Engineering Critical Assessment for Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section) What’s New?  New MAOP confirmation method - ECA • Conservative assumptions used for missing TVC values • Analyze & determine defect predicted failure pressure • MAOP is determined by lowest predicted failure pressure with safety factor applied Key Exceptions  None  “Path” to utilize where hydro records are incomplete WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 48. What is the Impact?  Identify any segments that require cyclic fatigue or crack / crack like defect threat analysis. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.632 Engineering Critical Assessment for Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure Re-Confirmation: Onshore Steel Transmission Pipelines (New Section)
  • 49. § 192.710 Transmission lines: Assessments Outside of High Consequence Areas (New Section) What’s New?  Assessment outside HCA’s where: • SMYS ≥ 30% • Class 3 or Class 4 areas • MCA, if piggable  Deadline - July 3, 2034 or 10 years post segment categorization  Reassessment interval – 10 years  Methods - ILI, hydro, spike hydro, direct examination, DA, and GWUT Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 50. What is the Impact?  The Impact is HIGH  Modify O&M to reflect new requirements (Not part of Subpart O)  Define pipeline moderate consequence areas WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.710 Transmission lines: Assessments Outside of High Consequence Areas (New Section)
  • 51. § 192.712 Analysis of Predicted Failures (New Section) What’s New?  Defect failure pressure analysis • Corrosion - ASME/ANSI B31G or R-STRENG • Cracks and Crack Like Defects - Models  Crack growth models • TVC records include CVN data (§ 192.607) • Defect stability • Remaining life • Precision / accuracy of assessment data • Conservative assumptions until assessed Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 52. What is the Impact?  The Impact is MEDIUM  Determine susceptibility to cracks and crack like defects  Modify O&M procedures to incorporate new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.712 Analysis of Predicted Failures (New Section)
  • 53. § 192.750 Launcher and Receiver Safety (New Section) What’s New?  July 1, 2021 – Launchers and receivers equipped with pressure relief device Key Exceptions  None What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Verify all ILI launchers and receivers comply with new safety standards WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 54. § 192.909 How Can an Operator Change its Integrity Management Program? What’s New?  Revised to reference PHMSA notification requirements under the new section § 192.18 Key Exceptions  None What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 55. § 192.917 How Does an Operator Identify Potential Threats to Pipeline Integrity and Use the Threat Identification in its Integrity Program? What’s New?  Seismicity, geology and soil stability  Emphasis  Cyclic fatigue analysis (7 year interval)  Manufacturing defect stability  Prove it by pressure test  ERW pipe section reference § 192.712 (Failure Pressure Analysis)  Cracks and crack like defects (New Section) Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 56. What is the Impact?  The Impact is MODERATE  Document why some threats are not or have not been considered  Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.917 How Does an Operator Identify Potential Threats to Pipeline Integrity and Use the Threat Identification in its Integrity Program?
  • 57. § 192.921 How is the Baseline Assessment to be Conducted? What’s New?  ILI assessment requirements  New section  Assessments Added  Spike hydro pressure test  Excavation and in-situ  Guided wave  MAOP re-confirmation Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 58. What is the Impact?  The Impact is MODERATE  Review IMP with regard to manufacturing defects, time dependent threats, cyclic fatigue threats, and crack & crack like defect threats WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.921 How is the Baseline Assessment to be Conducted?
  • 59. § 192.935 What Additional Preventive and Mitigative Measures Must an Operator Take? What’s New?  Outside force damage  Emphasis  Includes loading, longitudinal / lateral forces and seismicity of the area Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 60. What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements  Modify risk model to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.935 What Additional Preventive and Mitigative Measures Must an Operator Take?
  • 61. § 192.937 What is a Continual Process of Evaluation and Assessment to Maintain a Pipeline's Integrity? What’s New?  Aligned with Threats (§ 192.917)  Assessments Added • Excavation and in-situ • Guided wave • MAOP re-confirmation Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 62. What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.937 What is a Continual Process of Evaluation and Assessment to Maintain a Pipeline's Integrity?
  • 63. § 192.939 What are the Required Reassessment Intervals? What’s New?  Revised to reference PHMSA notification requirements under the new section § 192.18 Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 64. What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § 192.939 What are the Required Reassessment Intervals?
  • 65. § 192.949 How does an Operator Notify PHMSA [Removed and Reserved] What’s New?  Removed and replaced with new section § 192.18 Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 66. WHAT’S IN THE RULE? What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements § 192.949 How does an Operator Notify PHMSA [Removed and Reserved]
  • 67. § Appendix F to Part 192–Criteria for Conducting Integrity Assessments Using Guided Wave Ultrasonic Testing (GWUT) (New Section) What’s New?  Added Appendix F for GWUT assessment Key Exceptions  None WHAT’S IN THE RULE?
  • 68. What is the Impact?  The Impact is LOW  No longer an alternative technology that requires approval  Modify IMP manual to reflect new requirements WHAT’S IN THE RULE? § Appendix F to Part 192–Criteria for Conducting Integrity Assessments Using Guided Wave Ultrasonic Testing (GWUT) (New Section)
  • 69. Future Rules: The Rule does not include many changes to Parts 191 and 192 that PHMSA proposed at earlier points in the proceedings and will be included in future rules: WHAT’S NOT IN THE RULE? Mega Rule Part 2:  Repair criteria in HCAs  Creation of new repair criteria for non-HCAs  Requirements for inspecting pipelines following extreme events  Updates to pipeline corrosion control requirements  Codification of a management of change process  Clarification of certain other IMP requirements  Strengthening IMP assessment requirements
  • 70. Mega Rule Part 3: Requirements related to gas gathering lines that were proposed in the NPRM WHAT’S NOT IN THE RULE? Future Rules: The Rule does not include many changes to Parts 191 and 192 that PHMSA proposed at earlier points in the proceedings and will be included in future rules:
  • 71. Bryan Louque, P.E. Vice President, Asset Integrity & Corrosion D: 918.514.5879 C: 913.221.3446 blouque@auduboncompanies.com auduboncompanies.com Any Questions? Webinar recording and presentation will be emailed in 24-48 hours

Editor's Notes

  1. Failure Story September 2010 Rupture of 30” diameter gas pipeline. Resulting crater, 72’ long x 26’ wide Release ignited after the rupture Resulted in 8 fatalities, sent about 50 to the hospital and destroyed 37 homes, damaged 70 others. Technical Cause – Fracture of longitudinal weld seam. Operator records indicated seamless pipe. Findings indicated DSAW and SSAW pipe was used. NTSB Probable Cause - Inadequate QA/QC during construction (1956) - Inadequate IM program Contributing Causes - CPUC failed to detect inadequacies in operators IM program. - PHMSA IM inspection protocols need improvement 7) NTSB Recommendations to: - PHMSA - Operator - CPUC
  2. 1) Make an effort to relate effectiveness of new rule as a potential mitigative measure to causal failure.
  3. 1) Make an effort to relate effectiveness of new rule as a potential mitigative measure to causal failure.
  4. Low, Med, High subjective scale - How much work / organizational disruption with the regulation result in?
  5. Traceable records are those which can be clearly linked to original information about a pipeline segment or facility. Traceable records might include pipe mill records, which include mechanical and chemical properties; purchase requisition; or as-built documentation indicating minimum pipe yield strength, seam type, wall thickness and diameter. Careful attention should be given to records transcribed from original documents as they may contain errors. Information from a transcribed document, in many cases, should be verified with complementary or supporting documents. Verifiable records are those in which information is confirmed by other complementary, but separate, documentation. Verifiable records might include contract specifications for a pressure test of a pipeline segment complemented by pressure charts or field logs. Another example might include a purchase order to a pipe mill with pipe specifications verified by a metallurgical test of a coupon pulled from the same pipeline segment. In general, the only acceptable use of an affidavit would be as a complementary document, prepared and signed at the time of the test or inspection by a qualified individual who observed the test or inspection being performed. Complete records are those in which the record is finalized as evidenced by a signature, date or other appropriate marking such as a corporate stamp or seal. For example, a complete pressure testing record should identify a specific segment of pipe, who conducted the test, the duration of the test, the test medium, temperatures, accurate pressure readings, and elevation information as applicable. An incomplete record might reflect that the pressure test was initiated, failed and restarted without conclusive indication of a successful test. A record that cannot be specifically linked to an individual pipeline segment is not a complete record for that segment. Incomplete or partial records are not an adequate basis for establishing MAOP or MOP. If records are unknown or unknowable, a more conservative approach is indicated. For example, a mill test report must be traceable, verifiable, and complete, which is a typical record for pipelines. For the mill test report to be traceable it would need to be dated in the same time frame as construction or have some other link relating the mill record to the material installed in the pipeline, such as a work order or project identification. For the mill test report to be verified, it would need to be confirmed by the purchase or project specification for the pipeline or the alignment sheet with consistent information. Such an example would be verified by independent records. For the mill test report to be complete, it must be signed, stamped, or otherwise authenticated as a genuine and true record of the material by the source of the record or information, in this example it could be the pipe mill, supplier, or testing lab. Another common record is a pressure test record, which must be traceable, verifiable, and complete. For the pressure test record to be traceable, it would need to identify a specific and unique segment of pipe that was tested (such as mileposts, survey stations, etc.) or have some other link relating the pressure test to the physical location of the test segment, such as a work order, project identification, or alignment sheet. For the pressure test record to be verified, it would need to be confirmed by the purchase or project specification for the pipeline or the alignment sheet with consistent information. Such an example would be verified by independent records. For the pressure test record to be complete, it should identify a specific segment of pipe, who conducted the test, the duration of the test, the test medium, temperatures, accurate pressure readings, elevation information, and any other information required by § 192.517, as Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Gas Transmission Final Rule Page 12 of 16 applicable. An incomplete record might reflect that the pressure test was initiated, failed and restarted without conclusive indication of a successful test.
  6. I-77 Gas Pipeline Rupture and Fire – West Virginia. I-77 Closed in Both Directions for Approximately 18 Hours. Heat melted the concrete. Technical Cause – External Corrosion Root Cause – Lack of Inspection (Pipeline Was Not Piggable) Contributing Cause – Control Room Did Not Recognize the Rupture, No ASV or RCV’s to quickly isolation section. There is no comprehensive GIS-based source of roadways as defined in the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Highway Functional Classification Concepts, Criteria and Procedures, Section 3.1 (see: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/statewide/related/highway_functional_classificatio ns/fcauab.pdf). However, Section 4 of the FHWA document includes recommendations and guidance on how to obtain GIS-based roadway inventory data at a state level. PHMSA does not intend to develop a single source of data for operators to use to determine if an MCA exists on their pipeline system.
  7. A spike test is appropriate and should be considered for time-dependent threats, such as the following: stress corrosion cracking; selective seam weld corrosion; manufacturing and related defects, including defective pipe and pipe seams; and, other forms of defect or damage involving cracks or crack-like defects, such as those listed in §§ 192.710(c)(3), 192.917(e)(6) and 192.937(c)(3).
  8. The opportunistic gathering of data on unknown material properties does not need to meet the MAOP reconfirmation schedule outlined in § 192.624(b), except when the selected MAOP reconfirmation method requires material properties testing to reconfirm the MAOP.
  9. FAQ-18. When determining separate pipe “populations” for conducting a verifiable material properties and attributes sampling program that satisfies § 192.607(e)(1), must an operator compare the dates of manufacture and construction together, or must the manufacture and construction dates be compared separately? For example, would two segments of pipe that were manufactured in the same year but were installed together, 3 years after manufacture, be in the same population? As a second example, would two segments of pipe that were manufactured in the same year but installed 3 years apart be in the same population? When determining the vintage of two potentially similar pipeline segments (e.g., same diameter, wall thickness, grade, and seam type), operators must consider the following: If the difference between either the manufacturing date of the two segments or the construction date of the two segments is greater than 2 years, the two segments cannot be considered similar and must be placed in separate populations per the mandate in § 192.607(e)(1). In the first example, the two pipe segments would be in the same population. In the second example, the operator would not be able to place the two pipe segments in the same population unless additional records demonstrate traceability to another population of pipe.
  10. Operators must verify diameter, wall thickness, seam type, and grade (e.g., yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, or pressure rating for valves and flanges, etc.), and Charpy v-notch toughness values (if needed), if these items are unknown and are necessary for MAOP reconfirmation (per § 192.624), an engineering critical assessment (per § 192.632), or failure pressure analysis (per § 192.712), as specified by those regulations.
  11. This statement means the 8-hour period does not need to be continuous; it can be made up of shorter periods that over the course of 30-days amount to at least 8 hours above a certain pressure. Per §§ 192.624(c)(2) and (c)(5)(i), the value used as the highest actual sustained operating pressure must account for differences between upstream and downstream pressure on the pipeline by use of either the lowest maximum pressure value for the entire pipeline segment or using the operating pressure gradient along the entire pipeline segment (i.e., the location specific operating pressure at each location) that is protected from over-pressuring (see §§ 192.199 and 192.201).