This document discusses the policy evaluation process. It begins by defining policy evaluation as determining the effectiveness and efficiency of government policies and identifying areas for change and improvement. It then outlines the main stages of the policy process and lists four standards for conducting policy evaluations: utility, feasibility, propriety, and accuracy. The two main types of evaluation are formative and summative. Formative evaluation aims to improve a project during implementation while summative evaluation assesses outcomes. The key steps in the policy evaluation process are defined as: defining purpose and scope, specifying the evaluation design, creating a data collection plan, collecting and analyzing data, drawing conclusions, and providing feedback for improvement.

2. Submitted to :
Prof.Dr.Mahr Muhammad Saeed
Akhtar
Submitted by:
Umme-Rubab
MP/2015-s-16

3. Policy evaluation Process
Philosophical foundations of education

4. Policy Evaluation
It is a mean of determining the effectiveness
and efficiency of government policies and
identifies areas need change and
improvement

5. Stages of policy process
Agenda setting
Policy
formulation
Policy adoption
Policy
implementation
Policy
Evaluation

6. Standards for conducting policy
evaluation
There are four main standards for conducting policy
evaluation.
 Utility
 Feasibility
 Propriety
 accuracy

7. Types of evaluation
There are two main types of evaluation
Formative evaluation.
Summative evaluation.

8. Formative Evaluation
It is generally any evaluation that takes place
before or during a project's implementation
with the aim of improving the project's
design and performance.

9. Summative Evaluation
Summative evaluation refers to the
assessment of participants where the focus is
on the outcome of a program. This contrasts
with formative assessment, which
summarizes the participants development at
a particular time.

10. Steps in policy evaluation process
 Define purpose and scope.
 Specify evaluation design.
 Create a data collection plan.
 Collect data.
 Analyze data.
 Drawing conclusion.
 Feedback to improvement.

11. Define purpose and scope
Why are u doing the evaluation it defines
the purpose of it.
It also provides information about
program improvement and evaluation.

12. Specify evaluation design
Here the evaluation design is focused that which type of
design we will use such as:
 Status.
 Comparison.
 Change.
 Longitudinal.

13. Create a data collection plan
Here it is decided that hoe we will collect data
we can use the following techniques to
collect data:
Survey.
Focus group.
Observation.
Published instruments.

14. Collect data
Here we will see that how much data do we need.
100% population is ideal but it is too much
expensive and time consuming to collect data from
whole population.
We can use the following sampling techniques to
collect data:
Random sampling
Stratified sampling
Convenience sampling

15. Analyze data
Data collected during policy evaluation is compiled and
analyzed.
Area Frequency
Number of students getting 5 males
Non-traditional education 6 females

16. Drawing conclusions
Results are examined carefully and
objectively
Conclusion is drawn based on our data.
Results should signify the program

17. Feedback to program improvement
Evaluation findings are used to make
improvements.
Consider adjustments
Revise program strategies
Change methodologies
Increase time with program

18. Conclusion
Evaluation helps to:
Determine the effect of program on
recipients.
Know if u have reach your objectives.
Improve your program.