A model of the interplay between academic agency, institutional structure and open culture in the contribution and non contribution of Open Educational resources
This presentation explores the meta-synthesis process undertaken in the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project through Archer's (2003) social realist theoretical perspective.
Researching e-portfolios: The current state of playdcambrid
The first in the Europortfolio project's series of open webinars, from February 7, 2014. Inter/National Coalition for Electronic Portfolio Research co-directors Darren Cambridge, Barbara Cambridge, and Kathleen Yancey present on the philosophy behind and design of the Coalition, how its results illustrate the principle of "scaling out," and the four propositions about assessment with e-portfolios and their non-negotiable core that Coalition members are currently exploring.
This presentation explores the meta-synthesis process undertaken in the Research on Open Educational Resources for Development (ROER4D) project through Archer's (2003) social realist theoretical perspective.
Researching e-portfolios: The current state of playdcambrid
The first in the Europortfolio project's series of open webinars, from February 7, 2014. Inter/National Coalition for Electronic Portfolio Research co-directors Darren Cambridge, Barbara Cambridge, and Kathleen Yancey present on the philosophy behind and design of the Coalition, how its results illustrate the principle of "scaling out," and the four propositions about assessment with e-portfolios and their non-negotiable core that Coalition members are currently exploring.
Putting Theory to Work: Comparing theoretical perspectives on academic practi...John Hannon
As research into teaching, learning and professional development has shifted beyond cognitive and individually focussed accounts (Fenwick & Edwards, 2016; Peseta, Kligyte, Smith & McLean, 2016), what begins to surface are the negotiations, interdependencies and collectives inherent in academic work environments. These emergent socialities can be analysed by drawing on the rich conceptual resources of sociology that are used to explore complex issues in higher education. Yet sociology encompasses distinct traditions, concepts and methodologies that are rarely brought to comparative analysis in higher education or examined for their relative commensurability. In this chapter we attempt such a comparative endeavour, focussing on academics in a disciplinary collective and the resources they call upon in their professional development as university teachers, and in their response to organisational change.
The role of OER and OEP in promoting social inclusion in the Global SouthROER4D
This presentation explores whether or not Open Educational Resources and Open Educational Practices can be said to promote social inclusion in the Global South.
This presentation at OE Global 2018 discusses open educational resource and open eductional practice activities and projects in the Global South under Gidden's (2010) social inclusivity lens, with an eye to answering the question "Whether, why, and how do OEP and OER contribute to the social inclusion of underserved communities in the Global South?" It explores the idea that although OER and OEP may widen access to materials, they may also have an unintended consequence of reinforcing epistemic dependency on Global North pedagogies and theories.
Exploratory study of the approach to school leadership development programmes...Alexander_zl
Summary: This paper discusses the findings of a small scale exploratory research study on school leadership development programmes in Latvia. A brief international perspective on leadership development practices is given to appreciate more clearly the issues facing the Latvian context. The evaluation of current research in this field reveals a number of key trends in school leadership training frameworks. This indicates a changing landscape where traditional models of delivery are being succeeded by more innovative approaches.
Semi-structured interviews with three Programme Leaders and the Head of the Association of Educational Leaders of Latvia were conducted to elicit key empirical data. The findings point to a variety of provision with many good elements. However, it is clear that there is an urgent need to develop a more consistent and improved system based on a coherent, strategic and effective framework that addresses trends in the global educational world and recognizes and responds to the Latvian context.
Factors enabling and constraining OER adoption and Open Education Practices: ...ROER4D
Factors enabling and constraining OER adoption and Open Education Practices: lessons from the ROER4D project
Sukaina Walji & Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
Centre for Innovation in Learning & Teaching, University of Cape Town
Presentation at World Conference for Online Learning,
Toronto, Canada, 15-19 October 2017
NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS (Founded 1982 (www.nationalforum.com) is a group of national and international refereed journals. NFJ publishes articles on colleges, universities and schools; management, business and administration; academic scholarship, multicultural issues; schooling; special education; teaching and learning; counseling and addiction; alcohol and drugs; crime and criminology; disparities in health; risk behaviors; international issues; education; organizational theory and behavior; educational leadership and supervision; action and applied research; teacher education; race, gender, society; public school law; philosophy and history; psychology, sociology, and much more. Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Editor-in-Chief.
Version: draft for group discussion.
Prepared for Assignment 2, EDDE 804 - Leadership & Project Management in Distance Education, Ed. D. in Distance Education, Athabasca University, Canada
Presentation made at the Symposium on “Mainstreaming University-Community Research Partnerships” at Indian Habitat Center on 9th Apri 2015, Organized by PRIA.
Taking evidence-based professional learning conversations online: Implicatio...mddhani
Presented in one of the parallel sessions during the 15th International Conference on Education 2010 at Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
Presenter/courtesy of Michael Moroney, Lecturer, Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
UDL – Where the buck stops! - In the change to a UDL model, who does what? Presented at the AHEAD 2018 Conference - Let’s Bring the Elephant into the Room! - Reshaping the inclusive environment in further & higher education
Putting Theory to Work: Comparing theoretical perspectives on academic practi...John Hannon
As research into teaching, learning and professional development has shifted beyond cognitive and individually focussed accounts (Fenwick & Edwards, 2016; Peseta, Kligyte, Smith & McLean, 2016), what begins to surface are the negotiations, interdependencies and collectives inherent in academic work environments. These emergent socialities can be analysed by drawing on the rich conceptual resources of sociology that are used to explore complex issues in higher education. Yet sociology encompasses distinct traditions, concepts and methodologies that are rarely brought to comparative analysis in higher education or examined for their relative commensurability. In this chapter we attempt such a comparative endeavour, focussing on academics in a disciplinary collective and the resources they call upon in their professional development as university teachers, and in their response to organisational change.
The role of OER and OEP in promoting social inclusion in the Global SouthROER4D
This presentation explores whether or not Open Educational Resources and Open Educational Practices can be said to promote social inclusion in the Global South.
This presentation at OE Global 2018 discusses open educational resource and open eductional practice activities and projects in the Global South under Gidden's (2010) social inclusivity lens, with an eye to answering the question "Whether, why, and how do OEP and OER contribute to the social inclusion of underserved communities in the Global South?" It explores the idea that although OER and OEP may widen access to materials, they may also have an unintended consequence of reinforcing epistemic dependency on Global North pedagogies and theories.
Exploratory study of the approach to school leadership development programmes...Alexander_zl
Summary: This paper discusses the findings of a small scale exploratory research study on school leadership development programmes in Latvia. A brief international perspective on leadership development practices is given to appreciate more clearly the issues facing the Latvian context. The evaluation of current research in this field reveals a number of key trends in school leadership training frameworks. This indicates a changing landscape where traditional models of delivery are being succeeded by more innovative approaches.
Semi-structured interviews with three Programme Leaders and the Head of the Association of Educational Leaders of Latvia were conducted to elicit key empirical data. The findings point to a variety of provision with many good elements. However, it is clear that there is an urgent need to develop a more consistent and improved system based on a coherent, strategic and effective framework that addresses trends in the global educational world and recognizes and responds to the Latvian context.
Factors enabling and constraining OER adoption and Open Education Practices: ...ROER4D
Factors enabling and constraining OER adoption and Open Education Practices: lessons from the ROER4D project
Sukaina Walji & Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams
Centre for Innovation in Learning & Teaching, University of Cape Town
Presentation at World Conference for Online Learning,
Toronto, Canada, 15-19 October 2017
NATIONAL FORUM JOURNALS (Founded 1982 (www.nationalforum.com) is a group of national and international refereed journals. NFJ publishes articles on colleges, universities and schools; management, business and administration; academic scholarship, multicultural issues; schooling; special education; teaching and learning; counseling and addiction; alcohol and drugs; crime and criminology; disparities in health; risk behaviors; international issues; education; organizational theory and behavior; educational leadership and supervision; action and applied research; teacher education; race, gender, society; public school law; philosophy and history; psychology, sociology, and much more. Dr. William Allan Kritsonis, Editor-in-Chief.
Version: draft for group discussion.
Prepared for Assignment 2, EDDE 804 - Leadership & Project Management in Distance Education, Ed. D. in Distance Education, Athabasca University, Canada
Presentation made at the Symposium on “Mainstreaming University-Community Research Partnerships” at Indian Habitat Center on 9th Apri 2015, Organized by PRIA.
Taking evidence-based professional learning conversations online: Implicatio...mddhani
Presented in one of the parallel sessions during the 15th International Conference on Education 2010 at Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
Presenter/courtesy of Michael Moroney, Lecturer, Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
UDL – Where the buck stops! - In the change to a UDL model, who does what? Presented at the AHEAD 2018 Conference - Let’s Bring the Elephant into the Room! - Reshaping the inclusive environment in further & higher education
Similar to A model of the interplay between academic agency, institutional structure and open culture in the contribution and non contribution of Open Educational resources
Slides presented at the 5th International Meeting of OERu partners, including some contributions from the floor on research priorities in open education
Strategic Visions & Values: Inclusive Curricula and Leadership in Learning an...Richard Hall
Presentation for the Leadership in Learning and Teaching event at Durham University on 1 May 2019.
Project resources:
Universal Design for Learning: Evaluation Interim Report: https://www.dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/17106
A Literature Review of Universal Design for Learning: https://www.dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/17059
Freedom to Achieve: Project Evaluation Report: https://www.dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/16793
Chris Winberg's presentation at ICED, Stockholm, 2014Brenda Leibowitz
Chris presented data from the Cape Peninsula University of Technology case study, which forms part of the Structure, Culture and Agency research project.
Handbook for the integration of the gender perspective in teaching and researchSUPERA project
Presentation held by Maria J. Pando - Canteli and Pilar Rodriguez (Universidad de Deusto) during the SUPERA Final Conference, organised by SUPERA on 25 March 2022.
Researching ePortfolios: The current state of play- Darren Cambridge, Barbara...EPNET-Europortfolio
#ePortfolios #Webinar
webianr available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUVTGmLHYmU
Published on Feb 19, 2014
Researching ePortfolios: The current state of play led by Darren Cambridge, Babara Cambridge and Kathleen Blake Yancey
This webinar was held on Friday 7th Febuary 2014 by www.europortfolio.org
This webinar discusses the research on e-portfolios, presenting the work of the Inter/National Coalition for Electronic Portfolio Research as a model for collaborative inquiry embedded within the process of implementation that both generates new knowledge and leads to successful results.
Over more than a decade, the Coalition has worked with nearly 70 further and higher education institutions in the US, Canada, the UK, Australia, and the Netherlands to better understand how e-portfolios can supporting learning, assessment, and institutional change.
The webinar will provide an overview of the Coalition's process, survey some results from cohorts that have completed their work, and discuss current questions it is investigating and how they might apply to cross-sector practice in Europe.
For more information about the Coalition and its work see http://ncepr.org/
Webinar leaders will be: Barbara Cambridge, Director, Washington Office, National Council of Teachers of English, Darren Cambridge, Principal Consultant, Networked Learning Group, American Institutes for Research and Kathi Yancey, Kellogg W. Hunt Professor of English and Distinguished Research Professor, Florida State University.
Europortfolio is a European Network of ePortfolio Experts & Practitioners.
Europortfolio, a not-for profit association established with the support of the European Commission, is, dedicated to exploring how e-portfolios and e-portfolio-related technologies and practices can help us to empower:
1. 'Individuals as reflective learners and practitioners;
2. Organisations as a place for authentic learning and assessment, and
3. Society as a place for lifelong learning, employability and self-realisation."
Europortfolio has a broad agenda, if you would wish to know more, or to get involved, you can do this by visiting our website www.europortfolio.org
Hong Kong Knowledge Management SocietyIain Doherty
This is a presentation that I gave to the Hong Kong Knowledge Management Society. It is a high level look at the learning management system in higher education and the presentation makes the case for needing to focus on teaching and learning if eLearning is to be successful.
research-engaged teaching: a discussionRichard Hall
Slides for my workshop at DMU for the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences on research-engaged teaching.
Key links:
McLinden, M. et al. (2015). Strengthening the Links Between Research and Teaching. Education in Practice, 2(1), pp. 24-29
Student as Producer: https://studentasproducer.lincoln.ac.uk/
Information Literacy, Libraries, and Virtual Schools: New Standards for New M...alexrhodges
This roundtable focused conversation on how the emerging information literacy framework (ACRL, 2015) impacts libraries in virtual schooling environments. Participants discussed K-12 and higher education students' development of information literacy as a series of threshold concepts and metaliteracies (Mackey & Jacobson, 2011, 2014; Townsend, Brunetti, & Hofer, 2011). Participants also examined what the evolving information literacy framework means for virtual schools, libraries, teachers and librarians.
Hodges, A. & Ochoa, M. (2015). Information Literacy, Libraries, and Virtual Schools: New Standards for New Modalities. In D. Slykhuis & G. Marks (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (p. 2168). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Similar to A model of the interplay between academic agency, institutional structure and open culture in the contribution and non contribution of Open Educational resources (20)
"DEI Project in Latin America: Plan and preliminary findings" by Carina Bossu and Viviane Vladimirschi was presented at the 2 March 2021 GO-GN webinar.
Blog posts:
Proyecto DEI en Latinoamérica: Plan y resultados preliminares: http://go-gn.net/webinars/proyecto-dei-en-latinoamerica-plan-y-resultados-preliminares/
Projeto DEI na América Latina–Plano e dados preliminares: http://go-gn.net/webinars/projeto-dei-na-america-latina-plano-e-dados-preliminares/
DEI Project in Latin America: Plan and preliminary findings: http://go-gn.net/webinars/dei-project-in-latin-america-plan-and-preliminary-findings/
OEP to Expand High School Learning Environments, Spaces and Experiences was presented by Verena Roberts (EdD) as part of the Researcher Presentations at the GO-GN mini-seminar on 31 March 2020.
A recording of the session is available: https://www.youtube.com/user/GOGNOER/playlists
My #OpenDissertation Journey: First Steps was presented by Gabi Witthaus (Lancaster) as part of the Researcher Presentations at the GO-GN mini-seminar on 31 March 2020.
A recording of the session is available: https://www.youtube.com/user/GOGNOER/playlists
PhD Research Update was presented by Deb Baff (Lancaster) as part of the Researcher Presentations at the GO-GN mini-seminar on 31 March 2020.
A recording of the session is available: https://www.youtube.com/user/GOGNOER/playlists
An Ecological Lens on the Stressors of Planning for OER Engagement was presented by Danielle Dubien (Canterbury, NZ) as part of the Researcher Presentations at the GO-GN mini-seminar on 31 March 2020.
A recording of the session is available: https://www.youtube.com/user/GOGNOER/playlists
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Delivering Micro-Credentials in Technical and Vocational Education and TrainingAG2 Design
Explore how micro-credentials are transforming Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) with this comprehensive slide deck. Discover what micro-credentials are, their importance in TVET, the advantages they offer, and the insights from industry experts. Additionally, learn about the top software applications available for creating and managing micro-credentials. This presentation also includes valuable resources and a discussion on the future of these specialised certifications.
For more detailed information on delivering micro-credentials in TVET, visit this https://tvettrainer.com/delivering-micro-credentials-in-tvet/
Executive Directors Chat Leveraging AI for Diversity, Equity, and InclusionTechSoup
Let’s explore the intersection of technology and equity in the final session of our DEI series. Discover how AI tools, like ChatGPT, can be used to support and enhance your nonprofit's DEI initiatives. Participants will gain insights into practical AI applications and get tips for leveraging technology to advance their DEI goals.
Strategies for Effective Upskilling is a presentation by Chinwendu Peace in a Your Skill Boost Masterclass organisation by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan on 08th and 09th June 2024 from 1 PM to 3 PM on each day.
Normal Labour/ Stages of Labour/ Mechanism of LabourWasim Ak
Normal labor is also termed spontaneous labor, defined as the natural physiological process through which the fetus, placenta, and membranes are expelled from the uterus through the birth canal at term (37 to 42 weeks
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
How to Build a Module in Odoo 17 Using the Scaffold MethodCeline George
Odoo provides an option for creating a module by using a single line command. By using this command the user can make a whole structure of a module. It is very easy for a beginner to make a module. There is no need to make each file manually. This slide will show how to create a module using the scaffold method.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
A model of the interplay between academic agency, institutional structure and open culture in the contribution and non contribution of Open Educational resources
1. A model of the interplay between
academic agency, institutional
structure and open culture in the
contribution and non contribution of
Open Educational resources.
By
Glenda Cox
2. Context: OER in South Africa
• University of the Western Cape were the first
to launch an OER directory.
• SA Department of Higher Education and
Training included a section on the value of
OER in their 2012 Draft policy Framework for
the Provision of Distance Education in SA
Universities.
• UCT OpenContent launched in Feb 2010
• UNISA has recently launched “UNISA Open”
2
5. +185 000 visits
184 countries
UK:
5980
USA: 21
437
Germany: 1632
India: 6010
Philippines:
2134
Brazil:1564
Australia:
1892
South
Africa
91 281
5
6. Why am I doing this?
• My day-to-day work
• The basic rational of this study is that if
academics do not contribute and continue to
contribute resources as part of their academic
practice all Open Initiatives at UCT will fail,
“without academic buy in OER has no future” (
Browne et al. 2010:5). Rolfe (2012) concludes
that “central to sustainability is the community
and growth of a critical mass of interested
individuals” (p.7)
6
7. Purpose of this research
• Participation, both globally and locally is a
voluntary process.
• Why are academics contributing or not? At
UCT roughly 320 contributors so far ( out of
1000 permanent staff and many more on
contract and part time)
7
8. Goals
• Explain what impacts on individual choices in
the “socio-cultural system” in other words in
the context and also the broader realm of
ideas
• Aim to explain the interplay between the
various complex and transforming
components
8
9. Research questions
• What is the relationship between academic agency{Individual
choices}, the institutional system {context}and open culture
{ideas}and how does this impact on contribution and noncontribution of OER by academics in a Higher Education Institution?
• Sub questions:
• 1. Why do academics choose to, or not to, contribute OER?
• 2. What aspects of institutional structure impact upon OER
contribution and non contribution?
• 3. How does Open culture influence academics contribution to
OER?
9
10. Literature focused on sharing and
concerns about sharing
• Studies mostly in US, Europe, UK
• A handful from Africa
10
11. Suggested ‘motivators’ from literature
• Can be grouped under three main headings:
• Altruistic: Altruistic motivations are inspired by the premise that
everyone has a right to education and therefore learning should be
available to all, built on a belief in sharing and culture of
collaboration.
• Reputational: In the case of reputational or commercial
motivations the argument here is around raising the visibility of the
institution thereby enhancing its branding. This can also be on an
individual level
• Transformational: Transformational motivations concern
a fundamental change in the way education at institutions
have functioned
11
12. Key Concerns from literature
Sustainability
Systemic organisations
issues: Time, copyright
infringement, lack of
promotion and
recognition
Quality: View that some
materials are of poor
quality
Pedagogy: Some
disciplines and materials
not suited and OER are
not interactive
Personal concerns:
students won’t come
to
lectures
12
14. Identifying the GAPS
Empirical
Theoretical
• Few empirically based, but
many based on surveys &
not detailed interviews
• Very few studies in Africa
• Some partial attempts to
describe
• Not compelling or
sufficiently explanatory
14
15. Identifying the GAPS
Empirical
• Rolfe (2012) suggests that the
interviews are a better method of
collecting data [than the survey]
because if the “richness of
opinion”
• Ngimwa (2010) has written a
report on OER readiness in Africa
and says:“the question of human
factors affecting this adoption still
remains a big issue”
• Percy (2011) suggests a qualitative
study were academics are also
asked the underlying feelings
and attitudes towards OER and
how these are affected by culture
and politics.
15
16. Identifying the GAPS
Theoretical
• McAndrew (2006) used
Activity Theory as a lens to
investigate how the various
aspects in the adaptation of
OER influence an entire system.
• Hodgkinson-Williams and
Paskevicius (2012) also used AT
in order to understand the role
of postgraduate students in
adapting academics teaching
materials as OER. These
authors have used AT to make
useful causal arguments
around the university system as
well as to explain individual
actions.
16
17. Filling the Gaps
• This research will build on the pioneering
work of these authors who used AT to explain
the impact of OER. This research will
potentially fill this theoretical gap where up to
this point in time only a few attempts have
been made to move beyond describing the
results of interviews and surveys to explaining
why academics share OER or choose not to
share OER
17
18. Theory
• What do I need? A theoretical framework that:
• enables a fine-grained analysis of the individual as well
as the institutional and cultural systems within which
they are located
• will be able to provide descriptive and analytical tools
to enable the description and exploration of barriers
and enablers and how these impact upon teaching
projects of the individual academics
• is dialectical in its approach and able to move between
the individual and the social setting
• it needs to enable an explanation of change and
transformation.
18
19. Starting point: Activity Theory
• Activity Theory enables the researcher to
investigate activity within a social setting. This
social setting is also referred to as the activity
system. Engeström (1987) formulated a model
of the structure of this system which includes
the subject, object, tools, division of labour,
community, rules.
19
20. Pilot study (conducted 2011)
• 3 academics who have contributed
• 3 academics who have NOT contributed
• to assess the usefulness and applicability of
Activity Theory to frame and describe the
barriers and enablers across various contexts
within the University (UCT) system.
20
22. Barriers to sharing from Pilot
• The main barriers to contribution seem to be
around
– the rules of the institution around promotion and
what is valued by the institution.
– rules around the quality of teaching materials and
their readiness which seem unclear and are tacit
– some concerns about the pedagogical use and
value of OER.
22
23. Enablers: New findings from pilot
• In this pilot study it seems that the altruistic belief that
sharing has value (Sclater 2010a) is combined with
another enabler such as increased visibility.
• Other enablers of sharing includes;
– the importance of the stage in career in a faculty like
commerce where commercialisation is a key barrier to
sharing;
– the content of the resource itself is suited to sharing, this
enabler can also be a barrier, in other words some content
is simply not suited to sharing;
– the technical ability of the lecturers who are able to record
and upload their own lectures without any support from
the institution is an enabler.
23
24. Subjects’ role/Agency
• It is not clear from this initial pilot study
whether the role of the individual academic in
exercising their free will is important
• The three academics who are sharing were
also faced with constraints that they managed
to overcome because of their belief in sharing
and the value they place on OER.
24
25. Theory (repeated slide)
• What do I need? A theoretical framework that:
• enables a fine-grained analysis of the individual × as
well as the institutional and cultural systems within
which they are located.
• will be able to provide descriptive and analytical tools
to enable the description and exploration of barriers
and enablers and how these impact upon teaching
projects of the individual academics (did not test this).
• Is dialectical in its approach and able to move between
the individual and the social setting. x
• And lastly it needs to enable an explanation of change
and transformation.(Did not test this)
25
26. Gap: explaining agency
• It seemed from the pilot that my explanation
of why academics were adding resources was
limited.
• I would like to explore “agency” and I feel that
the well established social realism of Margaret
Archer could potentially fill this gap
• Archer also theorises the relationship
between structure and agency
26
27. Archer: Agency
• An individual’s sense of self comes from what
really matters to them, what we choose to
invest in. Individuals can exercise free will
however there are ‘degrees of freedom’ that
are constrained by the social structure (Archer
1982:464).
27
28. Agency of lecturers
...Individuals develop
and define their
ultimate concerns,
those internal goods
that they care about
most (Archer 2007:42)
Ultimate
Concerns
...develop course (s)
of action to realise
that concern by
elaborating a
project...
Projects
Translated into
a set of
practices
Practices
29. Engeström and Archer
• AT: Structure and culture
• Archer: Agency and interplay between structure and agency
• The two theories overlap in some ways as they are both
“materialist and realist, and all focus on tool and artefact-mediated
human labour as the basis of social reproduction and change and as
the basis for development of knowledge” (Wheelehan 2007:5).
• Wheelehan (2007) suggest the two theories should be blended in
order to take into account both the individual agency and the
broader workplace context and the presence of unequal power
relationships in the socio-cultural context (p.5)
29
30. Use both Activity theory and Archer
Tools
Structure
Subject/
agent
Outcome
Object
Activity
system
Rules
DOL
Community
30
31. Research design
• The bulk of the data will come from interview
transcriptions and will be qualitative.
• Some quantitative (analysis of codes and artefacts)
• I am using a case study approach. The aim of these
cases is : “to catch the complexity of (each) single case”
(Stake 1995: xi). The study will not attempt to claim
findings generalisable across all HE institutions
however it hopes that the deep mining nature of the
data will reveal the agental, social and cultural
influences on OER contribution and non-contribution
that have previously been unexplored.
31
32. Sampling
• 14 academics from UCT.
• Purposive sampling, a non-representative subset of
some larger population, (Cohen, Manion and Morrison
2007:114) will be used to identify these 14 individuals.
• Purposive sampling allows the researcher to “Handpick
the cases on the basis of their (researchers) judgement
of their typicality or possession of the particular
characteristics being sought” (Cohen, Manion and
Morrison 2007:115).
• The academics will each be interviewed twice with a
gap of approximately one year between interviews.
32
33. Method
• Maxwell’s Qualitative Research Design (2005, 2011) (critical
realist)
• Interviews will be transcribed and then coded according to
the activity theory framework which will position the
barriers and enablers onto nodes in the activity theory
triangle (Rules, Community, Division of Labour, Tools).
• Interview questions informed by Archer’s (2003, 2007)
work on agents and their ultimate concerns, projects and
practice.
• Coding is the main categorising mechanism in qualitative
research. Coding gives the researcher a mechanism to
“fracture” (Strauss 1987, p.29) the data and rearrange it.
33
34. Interviews (focus 1)
• First round complete- busy with findings
• Focus 1 includes open ended questions asking:
acedemics why they are sharing or not
sharing?
• Also questions around themes that have
emerged in the literature
34
36. Findings: Complex interplay between
factors impacting OER
Cultural
Agential
Technicalaffordances of the
internet
Philosophy of
openness.
Structural
Pedagogy
Financial-models
Altruism
Legal-alternate
copyright licensing
Quality
36
37. Interviews (Focus 2)
• Set of questions around life concerns, projects
and practices
• Can you describe your life projects or key
goals that you would like to achieve over the
next few years?
• whether or no they saw ( or had seen)
anything in their backgrounds which was
helpful or obstructive in relation to the
realising of concerns? Etc…
37
38. Individual action on OER sharing
Agential
Pedagogy
• Understand life
concerns and life
histories in order to
understand the
concerns academics
have
Quality
38
40. Archer (2003)
• Archer maintains that individuals have ‘internal
conversations’ where they reflect on social
situations in light of their concerns and ask
themselves “what should I do?”
• Archer has identified four forms of internal
conversation which govern agents’ responses to
social conditioning
• These conversations she argues are the link
between society and the individual, structure and
agency.
40
41. Four forms of internal conversation
• Communicative: maintain structure
• Autonomous: ambitious and seek to change
structures to fit their concerns
• Meta- reflexives: idealists who help others
and will ignore or subvert any constraints or
enablers in the structure ( Context)
• Fractured: not able to have internal
conversations
41
42. Meta-reflexives
• Usually academics ( but will have to show
that)
• They reflect on the process of reflecting
• High ideals and serve others
• Subvert constraints and enablements in their
environments in order to achieve their
concerns
42
43. Findings: reward and policy
• Would some kind of reward enable you to add
teaching materials as OER?
• Would a University policy enable you to
share?
• Both aspects in the literature
43
44. Reward or Policy
Reward an enabler
Yes
Group 1
Group 2
Total
Policy an enabler
Yes
No
No
5 whether or no they saw ( or had seen)
2
4
anything in their backgrounds which was
helpful or obstructive in relation to the
2
5
1
realising of concerns
3
7
9
7
5
6
44
45. Possible explanation
• For these meta-reflexives incentives do not
work.
• They are not sharing because they have
chosen not to…
• Their life concerns and projects are not about
sharing so for some of these academics
incentives will not change their practice.
45
46. Culture, Structure and Agency
Why are some academics influenced by structure
and culture?
Why are some not?
What are these academics concerned about and
can we model a framework to encourage them to
share?
How to explain sharing and not sharing?
Agents at the heart of sharing ( not extrinsic
awards)
46
Editor's Notes
Start by explaining the local contextUCTOutline empirical and theoretical gaps that I have identified andThen talk about what I plan to research and how I will go about doing it.
Khan academy
Almost 300 resources, granular- over 1000 itemsOver 300 academics have added, includes collaborations
I manage the OpenContent directoryMy concern is to make this work> I feel this this is the one of the best parts of my job. I think this can make a differenceOther initiatives like the OpenUCT project.
This the main question and three sub questions ( there are other key questions that I will mention in my method a little later)
Term motivators used in some of the key authors. Not necessarily one I will use.
Percy (2011) Exploring the barriers and enablers to the use of open educational resources by academics in higher educational institutions inAfrica. Unpublished Bachelor of Commerce (Honours) degree, University of Cape Town
Already used by others and it seemed that perhaps it would be useful for my purposes...
The activity in the system at UCT is preparing or creating teaching materials to share as OER in the OpenContent directory. Engeström et al (2010:6) clarifies that “the object is turned into outcomes with the help of instruments, that is, tools and signs”.In this triangle the Tools, are the mediating artefacts through which the object is transformed into the outcome (Figure 1). These mediating artefacts influence how the subject (s) acts on the object in order to arrive at the outcome. The subject is therefore influenced by the rules of the system, the community and also the division of labour (Engeström 1987). The community consists of all the individuals or groups who have a stake in the object of the activity system. The object therefore defines the community and helps to distinguish the community from other communities (Engeström 2001). The division of labour represents the hierarchy in the system including the power relations at play. Contradictions are historically present in Activity systems. When a new activity is introduced into the system internal ‘primary’ contradictions result in “aggravated secondary contradictions where some old element collides with a new one...” (Engeström, 2001:137). Contradictions are present and are crucial driving forces of transformation (Engeström and Sannino 2010). Articulating the location of these contradictions in the system and overcoming them can transform the activity.
Agency- that fine grained analysis of the individualArcher argues that it is possible to unpick them analytically. By isolating structural and/or cultural factors which provide a context of action for agents, it is possible to investigate how those factors shape the subsequent interactions of agents and how those interactions in turn reproduce or transform the initial context.
Importance if the agents- earlier social theorists gave structure the most power but Archer emphasises the importance of the agent to make choices.
Archer views individuals as “active agents” who follow a trajectory which starts with their ‘concerns’ - “those internal goods that they care most about”, which results in elaborating a ‘project’ and if the project successfully addresses the concern it is “translated into a set of established practices”(Archer 2007b, p.42).
Wheelehan article with the title: Blending activity theory and critical realism to theorise the relationship between the individual and society and the implications for pedagogyAnalytic dualism: While recognizing the interdependence of structure and agency (i.e. without people there would be no structures) she argues that they operate on different timescales. At any particular moment, antecedently existing structures constrain and enable agents, whose interactions produce intended and unintended consequences, which leads to structural elaboration and the reproduction or transformation of the initial structure. The resulting structure then provides a similar context of action for future agents. Likewise the initial antecedently existing structure was itself the outcome of structural elaboration resulting from the action of prior agents. So while structure and agency are interdependent,
Critical realists recognise the existence of an external world, independent of, and often defying, our desires of it and attempts to understand and change it (Benton and Craib 2001). Or Realists in the theory of knowledge are committed to the existence of a real world, which exists and acts independently of our knowledge of it. (B & C p.120)
At UCT we have seven Faculties and therefore two academics will be interviewed from each faculty. The sample will include 7 individuals who have contributed OER and seven who have not. The sampling strategy involves choosing individuals across all faculties, both male and female, from different age groups and from different academic rankings.
Group 1 recognise the time and effort it takes. Group 2 not willing to shareEven Policy more No’s it would not move them….