+
Let’s be “Person Critical”A vision for a new suite of enterprise
applications with a personal focus
Saurav Mohapatra
mohaps@gmail.com
+
“Mission Critical” Enterprise Apps
 Traditional Enterprise Applications are “Mission Critical”
 Designed to be sold “Top Down”
 Sold to the CIO or VP, Sales
 Adoption model is “by decree”
 Web based
 Centralized data store
 Assumes 24/7 “Always On” connectivity
 Prioritizes “Global Consistency” over “Local”
 Collaboration model assumes the ideal individual
 Assumes Non-zero sum competition amongst users
 “One for all and all for one”
 Designed with a view towards compliance to a single global model
of productivity
 Promotes “Group Think” over “Getting shit done™”
+
“Mission Critical” Enterprise Apps
(contd.)
 In short, designed for folks like these…
+
What is “Person Critical”?
 “Person Critical” inverts the paradigm
 Designed from ground up towards making a single user more productive and effective
 Collaboration is “integral (but incidental)” to achieving individual goals.
 Baked in, but not in your face.
 Recognizes the Game Theory concept of “Frenemies”
 Competitive Collaborators
 Zero-Sum Collaboration
 Assumes a post-PC “on the go” user with intermittent connectivity with a mobile device form factor
 iPad or Android tablet
 iPhone or comparable smart phone
 Varied connectivity – 3G/4G/WiFi/Offline
 “Local is king”
 All operations on local data store
 Advantage is fast search and retrieval
 Syncs to the “Global” data store via user choice
 How often? (on demand / scheduled)
 How much? (what actually gets synced)
 Adoption model is “Bottoms up”
 Individual subscriptions
 Viral adoption
 “Word of Mouth”/Referal Gamification
+
What is “Person Critical”? (contd.)
 Operates on a principle of “Convenient Solipsism”
 Primary focus: Individual/Personal Productivity
 If organization has access to traditional enterprise
applications/services, fully leverage them as required
 CRM
 Contact Management
 Chat/IM/Presence
 Content Management
 Streamlined User Experience
 “Intent is the feature is the app”
 “There’s an app for that”
 Minimum friction vector in “Getting Shit Done™”
+
“Person Critical” Poster Child
 This guy! 
+
Why “Person Critical”?
 The face of the Enterprise is changing
 Remember how Baby Boomers gave way to ex-Generation X/Y
as the decision makers in the enterprise?
 Guess what? The “hipsters” are next in line 
 A paradigm shift to mobile is taking place
 Same as the move to Desktop Computing in the 90’s
 And to the Web in the 00’s
 Vanguards:
 Dropbox
 Evernote
 MacBook and iDevices in the enterprise
+
Summary
 Not intended to replace traditional enterprise apps
 Some can’t be replaced
 Compliments the traditional “Mission Critical” enterprise app
offering
 Leverages emerging behavior and paradigms to bolster the
flanks of existing enterprise application players
 If we already have the brand and the trust
 Why not build a solid moat around our castle?
 Indicative Examples:
 Task Master (Personal CRM)
 EverBox  (Contextual Content Manager / Binder reborn)
 Pinger (Multi-protocol Multi-network Seesmic like client)

Person critical(mohapatra)

  • 1.
    + Let’s be “PersonCritical”A vision for a new suite of enterprise applications with a personal focus Saurav Mohapatra mohaps@gmail.com
  • 2.
    + “Mission Critical” EnterpriseApps  Traditional Enterprise Applications are “Mission Critical”  Designed to be sold “Top Down”  Sold to the CIO or VP, Sales  Adoption model is “by decree”  Web based  Centralized data store  Assumes 24/7 “Always On” connectivity  Prioritizes “Global Consistency” over “Local”  Collaboration model assumes the ideal individual  Assumes Non-zero sum competition amongst users  “One for all and all for one”  Designed with a view towards compliance to a single global model of productivity  Promotes “Group Think” over “Getting shit done™”
  • 3.
    + “Mission Critical” EnterpriseApps (contd.)  In short, designed for folks like these…
  • 4.
    + What is “PersonCritical”?  “Person Critical” inverts the paradigm  Designed from ground up towards making a single user more productive and effective  Collaboration is “integral (but incidental)” to achieving individual goals.  Baked in, but not in your face.  Recognizes the Game Theory concept of “Frenemies”  Competitive Collaborators  Zero-Sum Collaboration  Assumes a post-PC “on the go” user with intermittent connectivity with a mobile device form factor  iPad or Android tablet  iPhone or comparable smart phone  Varied connectivity – 3G/4G/WiFi/Offline  “Local is king”  All operations on local data store  Advantage is fast search and retrieval  Syncs to the “Global” data store via user choice  How often? (on demand / scheduled)  How much? (what actually gets synced)  Adoption model is “Bottoms up”  Individual subscriptions  Viral adoption  “Word of Mouth”/Referal Gamification
  • 5.
    + What is “PersonCritical”? (contd.)  Operates on a principle of “Convenient Solipsism”  Primary focus: Individual/Personal Productivity  If organization has access to traditional enterprise applications/services, fully leverage them as required  CRM  Contact Management  Chat/IM/Presence  Content Management  Streamlined User Experience  “Intent is the feature is the app”  “There’s an app for that”  Minimum friction vector in “Getting Shit Done™”
  • 6.
    + “Person Critical” PosterChild  This guy! 
  • 7.
    + Why “Person Critical”? The face of the Enterprise is changing  Remember how Baby Boomers gave way to ex-Generation X/Y as the decision makers in the enterprise?  Guess what? The “hipsters” are next in line   A paradigm shift to mobile is taking place  Same as the move to Desktop Computing in the 90’s  And to the Web in the 00’s  Vanguards:  Dropbox  Evernote  MacBook and iDevices in the enterprise
  • 8.
    + Summary  Not intendedto replace traditional enterprise apps  Some can’t be replaced  Compliments the traditional “Mission Critical” enterprise app offering  Leverages emerging behavior and paradigms to bolster the flanks of existing enterprise application players  If we already have the brand and the trust  Why not build a solid moat around our castle?  Indicative Examples:  Task Master (Personal CRM)  EverBox  (Contextual Content Manager / Binder reborn)  Pinger (Multi-protocol Multi-network Seesmic like client)