This summarizes a legal case between Marico Limited, an Indian FMCG company known for its Parachute coconut oil brand, and Abhijeet Bhansali, a YouTuber who published a video reviewing and criticizing Parachute coconut oil. In the video, Bhansali made claims asserting Parachute oil was of inferior quality compared to other oils. Marico filed suit arguing the claims were false and disparaging. The court found Bhansali's claims prima facie false and malicious given dubious evidence and misleading comparisons. It also found special damages as viewers commented they would stop buying Parachute. The court thus granted Marico's request for an injunction against Bhansali publishing the disparaging video
This document summarizes a landmark intellectual property rights case in India between Coca-Cola and Bisleri International. The case involved a dispute over the trademark "Mazza" and whether Bisleri could manufacture and export Mazza products. The Delhi High Court ruled that it had jurisdiction and issued an injunction preventing Bisleri from selling Mazza in India. It was determined that exporting products with the trademark was considered a sale in the exporting nation and constituted infringement. The court also held exporter Verma International liable for infringing on Coca-Cola's trademark.
This document discusses deceptive advertising practices and provides examples. It begins by defining advertising and its common forms. It then defines deceptive advertising and explains ways companies deceive consumers, such as using vagueness, concealing facts, exaggeration, and bait-and-switch tactics. Motivations for deceptive advertising are to convince customers to buy products and get rid of defective goods. The document concludes by outlining some laws in India related to advertising and providing case studies where the advertising complaints were found valid or invalid.
This document discusses brands, trademarks, and advertising. It begins by defining what a brand is, noting that a brand comprises a product or service, packaging, name/logo, promotion, and appeals to customers physically, aesthetically, rationally, and emotionally. It then defines what a trademark is, explaining that it distinguishes one company's goods/services from another's. The document recommends conducting trademark searches to identify potential issues and minimize risks. It also explains why trademarks should be registered, providing exclusive rights and prima facie evidence of ownership. The document concludes by discussing proper trademark use and marking.
Social Media Influencers and Intellectual Property RightsKerdaSoftech
This document discusses intellectual property rights (IPRs) and the legal risks that social media influencers face regarding IPR infringement. It notes that as social media platforms have become more accessible, influencers are more prone to IPR risks when using others' copyrighted content or trademarks without permission. The document outlines best practices for influencers to ensure compliance with IP laws and protect their own content, such as obtaining proper licenses, avoiding disparaging remarks about brands, and registering copyrights and trademarks. It emphasizes that influencers have a responsibility to understand IP laws due to their ability to impact audiences.
Product liability law governs how manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and others are held responsible for injuries caused by defective products. It has evolved from a doctrine of privity requiring direct transactions between injured and negligent parties, to recognition of implied warranties and exceptions to privity, to modern strict liability. Claims can be based on manufacturing defects, design defects, or failure to warn. Defenses include statutes of limitations, unavoidable dangers, assumption of risk, and failure to mitigate damages. Remedies include compensatory and punitive damages. In India, product liability draws from general statutes like the Consumer Protection Act as well as industry-specific acts, tort law, and criminal statutes.
What Every Marketer Needs To Know About The Law In The Digital AgeAMAMichiana
Presented by Sean J. Quinn of LADUE | CURRAN | KUEHN at the December 2014 AMA Michiana luncheon: http://www.amamichiana.com/portfolio/digital-marketing-laws/.
Questions about this presentation? Visit www.lck-law.com.
The Consumer Protection Act 1986 was enacted to protect the rights of consumers in India. It defines a consumer as someone who buys goods or uses services. The act established three levels of consumer courts - district forums for claims up to 20 lakh rupees, state commissions for claims from 20 lakhs to 1 crore, and a national commission for claims over 1 crore. It aims to protect consumers from unfair trade practices, restrictive trade practices, and defective goods or services. A consumer can file a complaint under this act if they have a grievance.
BUSINESS TORTS and PRODUCT LIABILITYChapter 7MeinersTawnaDelatorrejs
This document provides an overview of business torts and product liability law. It discusses various types of business torts including fraud, interference with contracts and prospective advantage. It covers product liability topics such as negligence, strict liability under contract law, and moves to strict liability in tort. It examines key areas of product liability law including manufacturing defects, failure to warn cases, design defects, and latent injuries. It also discusses defenses to negligence and strict liability claims.
This document summarizes a landmark intellectual property rights case in India between Coca-Cola and Bisleri International. The case involved a dispute over the trademark "Mazza" and whether Bisleri could manufacture and export Mazza products. The Delhi High Court ruled that it had jurisdiction and issued an injunction preventing Bisleri from selling Mazza in India. It was determined that exporting products with the trademark was considered a sale in the exporting nation and constituted infringement. The court also held exporter Verma International liable for infringing on Coca-Cola's trademark.
This document discusses deceptive advertising practices and provides examples. It begins by defining advertising and its common forms. It then defines deceptive advertising and explains ways companies deceive consumers, such as using vagueness, concealing facts, exaggeration, and bait-and-switch tactics. Motivations for deceptive advertising are to convince customers to buy products and get rid of defective goods. The document concludes by outlining some laws in India related to advertising and providing case studies where the advertising complaints were found valid or invalid.
This document discusses brands, trademarks, and advertising. It begins by defining what a brand is, noting that a brand comprises a product or service, packaging, name/logo, promotion, and appeals to customers physically, aesthetically, rationally, and emotionally. It then defines what a trademark is, explaining that it distinguishes one company's goods/services from another's. The document recommends conducting trademark searches to identify potential issues and minimize risks. It also explains why trademarks should be registered, providing exclusive rights and prima facie evidence of ownership. The document concludes by discussing proper trademark use and marking.
Social Media Influencers and Intellectual Property RightsKerdaSoftech
This document discusses intellectual property rights (IPRs) and the legal risks that social media influencers face regarding IPR infringement. It notes that as social media platforms have become more accessible, influencers are more prone to IPR risks when using others' copyrighted content or trademarks without permission. The document outlines best practices for influencers to ensure compliance with IP laws and protect their own content, such as obtaining proper licenses, avoiding disparaging remarks about brands, and registering copyrights and trademarks. It emphasizes that influencers have a responsibility to understand IP laws due to their ability to impact audiences.
Product liability law governs how manufacturers, distributors, retailers, and others are held responsible for injuries caused by defective products. It has evolved from a doctrine of privity requiring direct transactions between injured and negligent parties, to recognition of implied warranties and exceptions to privity, to modern strict liability. Claims can be based on manufacturing defects, design defects, or failure to warn. Defenses include statutes of limitations, unavoidable dangers, assumption of risk, and failure to mitigate damages. Remedies include compensatory and punitive damages. In India, product liability draws from general statutes like the Consumer Protection Act as well as industry-specific acts, tort law, and criminal statutes.
What Every Marketer Needs To Know About The Law In The Digital AgeAMAMichiana
Presented by Sean J. Quinn of LADUE | CURRAN | KUEHN at the December 2014 AMA Michiana luncheon: http://www.amamichiana.com/portfolio/digital-marketing-laws/.
Questions about this presentation? Visit www.lck-law.com.
The Consumer Protection Act 1986 was enacted to protect the rights of consumers in India. It defines a consumer as someone who buys goods or uses services. The act established three levels of consumer courts - district forums for claims up to 20 lakh rupees, state commissions for claims from 20 lakhs to 1 crore, and a national commission for claims over 1 crore. It aims to protect consumers from unfair trade practices, restrictive trade practices, and defective goods or services. A consumer can file a complaint under this act if they have a grievance.
BUSINESS TORTS and PRODUCT LIABILITYChapter 7MeinersTawnaDelatorrejs
This document provides an overview of business torts and product liability law. It discusses various types of business torts including fraud, interference with contracts and prospective advantage. It covers product liability topics such as negligence, strict liability under contract law, and moves to strict liability in tort. It examines key areas of product liability law including manufacturing defects, failure to warn cases, design defects, and latent injuries. It also discusses defenses to negligence and strict liability claims.
The Consumer Protection Act of 1986 and its subsequent amendments aim to protect consumers from unfair trade practices. The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) was formed under the Consumer Protection Act of 2019 to promote and enforce consumer rights. The CCPA has powers to investigate businesses, recall unsafe products, impose penalties for violations of law, and handle consumer complaints. To file a complaint, a consumer must submit a written complaint to the appropriate consumer disputes redressal forum along with documents and court fees. Remedies available to consumers include refunds, replacement of goods, compensation, and cessation of unfair trade practices.
Indian Intellectual Property Cases Report, 2021.pdfBananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is happy to launch the IP Cases Report for the year 2021. This report covers cases related to intellectual property decided by Courts in India, in the form of case notes. These case notes cover important decisions on critical questions of law and fact with respect to various species of intellectual property.
Comparative Advertisement and Product DisparagementShubhi Verma
This document discusses comparative advertising and product disparagement under Indian law. It begins by defining these concepts and outlining relevant acts like the MRTP Act 1969. Case studies from India and other countries like the US and Germany are presented. The key findings are that comparative advertising is allowed under constitutional rights to free speech if it is truthful, but disparaging a competitor's product is prohibited. Indian law and judicial precedents make it clear that competitors can be referenced when comparing products, but not in a way that damages their reputation or trademark. Overall the position in India is similar to other countries that allow comparative advertising.
This document is a project report by Diwaker Pandey on unaware consumers and consumer rights. It discusses key topics like the definition of a consumer, common problems faced by consumers in the marketplace, the consumer movement in India, the Consumer Protection Act of 1986, consumer rights and responsibilities, and quality standard marks. The objective is to educate consumers and reduce exploitation by making them aware of their rights. It concludes that both government and consumers must work together to increase awareness of consumer rights and responsibilities.
This document summarizes several recent intellectual property cases from Indian courts. It discusses cases related to patent infringement, trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and passing off. In one case, the court issued an injunction in favor of Pidilite Industries in a trademark infringement case regarding the mark "KWIKHEAL". In another case regarding a film script, the court held that under the Copyright Act, an author retains special rights to claim authorship of their work even after assignment.
Globally remove links of video defaming Ramdev, Delhi HC directs Facebook, Go...sabrangsabrang
This document is a court judgment from the High Court of Delhi regarding a defamation case filed by Swami Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. against Facebook, Google, YouTube, Twitter and others ("Platforms"). The Plaintiffs allege that defamatory content about them from a book was disseminated on the Platforms and sought an injunction. The court had earlier directed the Platforms to remove the URLs for access in India but not globally. In this judgment, the court considers arguments for and against globally blocking the URLs and content. The Plaintiffs argue for a global block, while the Platforms argue they should not be obligated to implement court orders globally. The court examines the relevant laws and precedents
This document provides an overview of a social studies lesson plan on consumerism for 8th grade students. It includes objectives, key terms, vocabulary, and activities related to topics like goods and services, types of consumers, factors that influence consumer demand, consumer rights and responsibilities, and consumer protection agencies. Students will analyze how advertising influences consumer behavior and complete assignments designing marketing campaigns and budgets.
This document discusses Federal Trade Commission guidelines for contracts and disclosures relating to influencer marketing. It provides an overview of the key elements that should be included in contracts for brand collaborations, photography work, and travel. It also summarizes FTC requirements for clear and conspicuous disclosures in sponsored social media posts and advertisements. The document notes that failure to properly disclose a material connection between an influencer and brand advertiser could constitute deceptive practices under the FTC Act.
The document summarizes consumer protection in India. It discusses the importance of consumer protection for both consumers and businesses. It outlines key consumer rights and responsibilities. The document also describes the legal framework for consumer protection in India, including important acts and laws. There are three tiers for consumer grievance redressal - district, state and national commissions. Consumer organizations play an important role in educating consumers and advocating for their rights.
Comparative advertising directly compares a business or product to a competitor. It aims to establish what offerings are superior to highlight benefits to consumers. Caution is needed to avoid legal risks like inaccurate claims or denigrating competitors. Indian law allows comparative advertising if statements are factual and don't unfairly attack other brands. The Advertising Standards Council of India regulates advertising through voluntary self-regulation and prohibits advertisements that are untruthful, inappropriate, promote harmful products, or are derogatory to competition. Comparative advertising can benefit consumers by providing more information but also risks if undertakings make unfair comparisons.
This document provides an overview of legal issues related to advertising, marketing, contests, and copyright. It discusses publisher's liability for misleading ads and the defense of good faith dissemination. General advertising principles like substantiating claims are covered, along with exceptions for puffery and opinions. Comparative advertising and tactics to avoid unsubstantiated claims are also summarized. The document concludes with a brief discussion of public domain works, contest regulations, and disclosure requirements.
This is a presentation of Intellectual property rights , how can we use them , what are its benefits and how the intellectual property is protected under these laws.
This document discusses several important legal issues that entrepreneurs need to consider, including intellectual property (patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets), hiring a lawyer, selecting a lawyer, legal issues in setting up an organization, patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, licensing, and product safety/liability. Key points covered are the importance of protecting intellectual property assets, evaluating legal needs at different stages of business, and understanding the different types of intellectual property protection available.
This document discusses several important legal issues for entrepreneurs, including intellectual property, hiring a lawyer, selecting a lawyer, legal issues in setting up an organization, patents, business method patents, trademarks, and copyrights. It provides details on each topic, such as the different types of patents, how to apply for patents and trademarks, and when copyright protection applies. The overall document serves to educate entrepreneurs on key legal considerations and steps they need to take to protect their ideas, brands, and business entities.
Business law presentation on Consumer protection actThakurRaviBisht1
This document provides an overview of the Consumer Protection Act of 1986 and 2019 in India. It discusses key aspects of the acts including their aims to protect consumer interests, establish consumer councils and dispute resolution commissions, define unfair trade practices, and outline consumer rights and responsibilities. Procedures for filing complaints with the district, state, and national consumer commissions are also summarized.
Brands Advertising and Marketing Event - How to avoid unfair trading in pract...Browne Jacobson LLP
Alex is an IP partner at Browne Jacobson who specialises in advertising and marketing issues, live events, brand strategy, sponsorship and commercial agreements with a large intellectual property element.
At our eighth annual Brands Advertising and Marketing Event, Alex Watt spoke about unfair trading in practice.
During the event we looked at the changes that are being made to the traditional ways we advertise, market and sell brands in light of the shifting expectations of consumers and how they wish to experience products today. We also reviewed some of the recent legislation and case law dealing with unfair trading, experiential advertising and intellectual property.
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeks to promote and protect the interest of consumers against deficiencies and defects in goods or services. It also seeks to secure the rights of a consumer against unfair or restrictive trade practices.
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Parliament of India. Long title. An Act to provide for protection of the interests of consumers and for the said purpose, to establish authorities for timely and effective administration and settlement of consumers' disputes and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
To Provide better and all round protection to consumer. To Provide machinery for the speedy redressal of the grievances. To Create framework for consumers to seek redressal.
For more visit:http://snehilchugh.in/
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
The Consumer Protection Act of 1986 and its subsequent amendments aim to protect consumers from unfair trade practices. The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) was formed under the Consumer Protection Act of 2019 to promote and enforce consumer rights. The CCPA has powers to investigate businesses, recall unsafe products, impose penalties for violations of law, and handle consumer complaints. To file a complaint, a consumer must submit a written complaint to the appropriate consumer disputes redressal forum along with documents and court fees. Remedies available to consumers include refunds, replacement of goods, compensation, and cessation of unfair trade practices.
Indian Intellectual Property Cases Report, 2021.pdfBananaIP Counsels
BananaIP is happy to launch the IP Cases Report for the year 2021. This report covers cases related to intellectual property decided by Courts in India, in the form of case notes. These case notes cover important decisions on critical questions of law and fact with respect to various species of intellectual property.
Comparative Advertisement and Product DisparagementShubhi Verma
This document discusses comparative advertising and product disparagement under Indian law. It begins by defining these concepts and outlining relevant acts like the MRTP Act 1969. Case studies from India and other countries like the US and Germany are presented. The key findings are that comparative advertising is allowed under constitutional rights to free speech if it is truthful, but disparaging a competitor's product is prohibited. Indian law and judicial precedents make it clear that competitors can be referenced when comparing products, but not in a way that damages their reputation or trademark. Overall the position in India is similar to other countries that allow comparative advertising.
This document is a project report by Diwaker Pandey on unaware consumers and consumer rights. It discusses key topics like the definition of a consumer, common problems faced by consumers in the marketplace, the consumer movement in India, the Consumer Protection Act of 1986, consumer rights and responsibilities, and quality standard marks. The objective is to educate consumers and reduce exploitation by making them aware of their rights. It concludes that both government and consumers must work together to increase awareness of consumer rights and responsibilities.
This document summarizes several recent intellectual property cases from Indian courts. It discusses cases related to patent infringement, trademark infringement, copyright infringement, and passing off. In one case, the court issued an injunction in favor of Pidilite Industries in a trademark infringement case regarding the mark "KWIKHEAL". In another case regarding a film script, the court held that under the Copyright Act, an author retains special rights to claim authorship of their work even after assignment.
Globally remove links of video defaming Ramdev, Delhi HC directs Facebook, Go...sabrangsabrang
This document is a court judgment from the High Court of Delhi regarding a defamation case filed by Swami Ramdev and Patanjali Ayurved Ltd. against Facebook, Google, YouTube, Twitter and others ("Platforms"). The Plaintiffs allege that defamatory content about them from a book was disseminated on the Platforms and sought an injunction. The court had earlier directed the Platforms to remove the URLs for access in India but not globally. In this judgment, the court considers arguments for and against globally blocking the URLs and content. The Plaintiffs argue for a global block, while the Platforms argue they should not be obligated to implement court orders globally. The court examines the relevant laws and precedents
This document provides an overview of a social studies lesson plan on consumerism for 8th grade students. It includes objectives, key terms, vocabulary, and activities related to topics like goods and services, types of consumers, factors that influence consumer demand, consumer rights and responsibilities, and consumer protection agencies. Students will analyze how advertising influences consumer behavior and complete assignments designing marketing campaigns and budgets.
This document discusses Federal Trade Commission guidelines for contracts and disclosures relating to influencer marketing. It provides an overview of the key elements that should be included in contracts for brand collaborations, photography work, and travel. It also summarizes FTC requirements for clear and conspicuous disclosures in sponsored social media posts and advertisements. The document notes that failure to properly disclose a material connection between an influencer and brand advertiser could constitute deceptive practices under the FTC Act.
The document summarizes consumer protection in India. It discusses the importance of consumer protection for both consumers and businesses. It outlines key consumer rights and responsibilities. The document also describes the legal framework for consumer protection in India, including important acts and laws. There are three tiers for consumer grievance redressal - district, state and national commissions. Consumer organizations play an important role in educating consumers and advocating for their rights.
Comparative advertising directly compares a business or product to a competitor. It aims to establish what offerings are superior to highlight benefits to consumers. Caution is needed to avoid legal risks like inaccurate claims or denigrating competitors. Indian law allows comparative advertising if statements are factual and don't unfairly attack other brands. The Advertising Standards Council of India regulates advertising through voluntary self-regulation and prohibits advertisements that are untruthful, inappropriate, promote harmful products, or are derogatory to competition. Comparative advertising can benefit consumers by providing more information but also risks if undertakings make unfair comparisons.
This document provides an overview of legal issues related to advertising, marketing, contests, and copyright. It discusses publisher's liability for misleading ads and the defense of good faith dissemination. General advertising principles like substantiating claims are covered, along with exceptions for puffery and opinions. Comparative advertising and tactics to avoid unsubstantiated claims are also summarized. The document concludes with a brief discussion of public domain works, contest regulations, and disclosure requirements.
This is a presentation of Intellectual property rights , how can we use them , what are its benefits and how the intellectual property is protected under these laws.
This document discusses several important legal issues that entrepreneurs need to consider, including intellectual property (patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets), hiring a lawyer, selecting a lawyer, legal issues in setting up an organization, patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, licensing, and product safety/liability. Key points covered are the importance of protecting intellectual property assets, evaluating legal needs at different stages of business, and understanding the different types of intellectual property protection available.
This document discusses several important legal issues for entrepreneurs, including intellectual property, hiring a lawyer, selecting a lawyer, legal issues in setting up an organization, patents, business method patents, trademarks, and copyrights. It provides details on each topic, such as the different types of patents, how to apply for patents and trademarks, and when copyright protection applies. The overall document serves to educate entrepreneurs on key legal considerations and steps they need to take to protect their ideas, brands, and business entities.
Business law presentation on Consumer protection actThakurRaviBisht1
This document provides an overview of the Consumer Protection Act of 1986 and 2019 in India. It discusses key aspects of the acts including their aims to protect consumer interests, establish consumer councils and dispute resolution commissions, define unfair trade practices, and outline consumer rights and responsibilities. Procedures for filing complaints with the district, state, and national consumer commissions are also summarized.
Brands Advertising and Marketing Event - How to avoid unfair trading in pract...Browne Jacobson LLP
Alex is an IP partner at Browne Jacobson who specialises in advertising and marketing issues, live events, brand strategy, sponsorship and commercial agreements with a large intellectual property element.
At our eighth annual Brands Advertising and Marketing Event, Alex Watt spoke about unfair trading in practice.
During the event we looked at the changes that are being made to the traditional ways we advertise, market and sell brands in light of the shifting expectations of consumers and how they wish to experience products today. We also reviewed some of the recent legislation and case law dealing with unfair trading, experiential advertising and intellectual property.
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 seeks to promote and protect the interest of consumers against deficiencies and defects in goods or services. It also seeks to secure the rights of a consumer against unfair or restrictive trade practices.
The Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Parliament of India. Long title. An Act to provide for protection of the interests of consumers and for the said purpose, to establish authorities for timely and effective administration and settlement of consumers' disputes and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
To Provide better and all round protection to consumer. To Provide machinery for the speedy redressal of the grievances. To Create framework for consumers to seek redressal.
For more visit:http://snehilchugh.in/
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
1. Marico Limited vs
Abhijeet Bhansali
Incase u need reference
https://dastawezz.com/2021/05/21/marico-v-abhijeet-bhansali-
influencers-and-brand-protection-in-the-age-in-social-media/ slide 1,
2 , 7-12
https://legaldesire.com/marico-limited-vs-abhijeet-bhansali/ slide 3-
6 AND comments
https://rmlnlulawreview.com/2020/02/11/social-media-influencers-
and-the-law-observations-after-marico-limited-v-abhijeet-bhansali/
law on disparagement
https://iiprd.wordpress.com/2020/08/29/what-takes-precedence-
right-to-reputation-or-right-to-freedom-of-speech-and-expression/
slide 7
2. introduction
• In the early part of 2020, the Bombay High Court was called upon to adjudicate a matter involving
a social media influencer. The Bombay High Court’s judgement in the case of Marico Limited v.
Abhijeet Bhansali[1] determines the nature of social media influencers’ relationship with
marketers and followers/subscribers had an impact on the court’s decision. In the case above
mention wherein the Learned Single Judge of Hon’ble High Court of Bombay Justice S. J. Kathawalla
restrained by an order of temporary injunction a social media influencer concerning a video in
which he reviews a branded Coconut Oil and compares it with Virgin Coconut Oil. The Learned
Single Judge found the Video to be false and disparaging. The Influencer in question filed an appeal
which reversed the findings of the Learned Single Judge subject to certain modification in the
video.
3. Brief Facts
• Plaintiff, one of the biggest FMCG companies in India and one of Plaintiff’s products,
Parachute edible coconut oil, was claimed to be amongst the most reputed brands owned
by Plaintiff. Defendant, a YouTuber had his channel titled ‘Bearded Chokra’. On or about
1st September 2018, Defendant published a video titled ‘Is Parachute Coconut Oil 100%
Pure?’. In this video, Defendant reviewed Plaintiff’s product. In the mentioned video the
defendant is forceful, decisive and assertive with his words and statements against
PARACHUTE branded coconut oil. He explains that it is one of the most sold and
consumed coconut oils in India and that he was going to “break down all the tiny details”
about the product and “bring the truth” to the viewers. Plaintiff filed the present suit
claiming that Defendant made false claims and statements about Plaintiff’s product.
4. facts
• 1. Marico Limited, the plaintiff was one of the leading players in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) market
in India that manufactures and markets inter alia packaged edible oil, edible coconut oil, oats, hair oil, beauty
products and other personal care product(s) under its portfolio of various well-known and prestigious brands.
• 2. The plaintiff’s most well-known trademarks are PARACHUTE under which it markets inter alia its edible coconut.
The plaintiff had undertaken the extensive promotion of its edible coconut oil sold under the brand PARACHUTE in
various media.
• 3. The defendant was a “YouTuber” / “V-Blogger” who had his channel titled “Bearded Chokra” on the popular
website “Youtube”.
• 4. On his channel, the defendant who claims to have a Postgraduate degree in Bio-Technology from the Mumbai
University produces and uploads videos wherein he reviews products of various manufacturers.
• 5. On or about 1st September 2018, the defendant published a video titled “Is Parachute Coconut Oil 100% Pure?”.
In this video, the defendant reviewed the plaintiff’s PARACHUTE coconut oil. According to the plaintiff, in or about
last week of January 2019, it came across the Impugned video published by the defendant.
• 6. It is the plaintiff’s case that in the Impugned Video the defendant makes claims and statements concerning the
plaintiff’s PARACHUTE edible coconut Oil, which are false and unsubstantiated.
5. • 7. The plaintiff stated that on the whole, the Impugned Video was disparaging and denigrating in
nature.
• 8. The plaintiff through its Advocates sent an email dated 28th January 2019 to the defendant
whereby the defendant was called upon to cease and desist from publishing or in any manner
communicating the Impugned Video to the public, and calling upon him to remove the Impugned
Video from social media sites including his YouTube channel.
• 9. On 29th January 2019, the defendant replied to the Plaintiff’s advocates defending his video
and also proposed to re-make / modify and/or delete portions of the Impugned Video subject to
certain conditions stated therein.
• 10. On 30th January 2019, the defendant sent another email to the Plaintiff’s advocates stating
that he is expecting a response from the plaintiff.
• 11. On 30th January 2019, the plaintiff, through its Advocates, replied with a holding email stating
that the contents of the defendant’s emails were being considered by the plaintiff and called upon
the defendant to remove the Impugned Video in the meantime.
6. • 12. The defendant refused to comply with the aforesaid request of the plaintiff stating that he had a
right to voice his opinion.
• 13. On 11th February 2019, the plaintiff filed the present suit and on 13th February 2019, the plaintiff
made an application for urgent ad-interim reliefs.
• 14. The defendant filed his affidavit in reply; the plaintiff filed its affidavit in rejoinder, and the
defendant filed a supplementary affidavit in Reply.
• 15. Since the pleadings in the matter were complete, by consent of both the sides, the court took up
the notice of Motion for final hearing.
• 16. The plaintiff inter alia prayed for an injunction against the defendant, restraining him from
• · Publishing or broadcasting or communicating to the public the Impugned Video,
• · Disparaging or denigrating the plaintiff’s PARACHUTE COCONUT OIL product or any other product of the
plaintiff or the plaintiff’s business and
• · Infringing the registered trademarks of the plaintiff.
7. Trademark Infringement and Product
Disparagement
• For a liability to exist, the defendant must satisfy all the ingredients to constitute disparagement,
slander of goods and malicious falsehood. The constituents of slander of goods/ product
disparagement/ malicious falsehood include:
1. The impugned statements must be false;
2. There must be a clear intent of causing harm;
3. There must be damage caused by such impugned statements.
• The defendant claims that “This video was only to bring awareness to the general public of the
inferior quality of parachute coconut oil.” The defendant also contends that he conducted the tests
required before publishing the video along with providing the court with scholarly articles which
were referred before the publication of the video.
8. Law on Disparagement
• It is settled law that the law of personal defamation is distinct from the law of malicious falsehood
and slander of goods. In Reckit Benckiser (India) Limited v Naga Limited, the Delhi High Court
explained that, in the latter, the plaintiff suffers special damages, as the damage is not restricted to
his reputation but is also to his property and trade. There are three essentials for proving
disparagement as provided in Halsbury’s Laws of England (quoted in Hindustan Unilever Limited v
Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Ltd.): (i) that the defendant’s statements are false;
(ii) that the statements were made maliciously or recklessly; (iii) that the said statements caused
special damages to the plaintiff.
9. • In Marico Limited, the first essential was satisfied prima facie as the influencer had cited dubious
internet material to justify his claims. He also muddled the distinction between virgin organic
coconut oil (oil as removed from wet coconut kernel) and organic coconut oil (oil derived from
copra or dried coconut kernel), which are treated differently under the Food Safety and Standards
Regulations, 2011. Thus, the claims made therein were patently false. As far as the maliciousness
and recklessness of the statements is concerned, the same were exemplified by the manner in
which the influencer presented the claims: he insisted that the same were ‘scientific’ and
‘empirical’ despite a lack of expertise in the matter, the purposeful erasing of the distinction
between the two aforesaid kinds of coconut oil, and the overall vindictive tone of the video and
related text. Lastly, any special damage to Marico was evinced by the comments below the
influencer’s video, which showcased that several viewers had taken the decision to not use
Parachute after having watched the video.
10. Plaintiff’s arguments
• The Impugned video provided incorrect information and deceived the viewer into believing that
the tests conducted substantiated the claim of the defendant that the plaintiff’s product was of
inferior quality and/or is inferior to other oils, subsequently, the impugned video as a whole was
disparaging and denigrating in nature. The video also maliciously published by the defendant
comprises words and visuals in respect of the plaintiffs’ product, which were false, and which have
not only denigrated the plaintiff’s product but also caused and likely to further cause special
damage to the plaintiff. Since the defendant claims that creation and publication of such videos is
his occupation and source of livelihood, the defendant’s review cannot be equated or treated at
par with any other review provided by an ordinary consumer since the intention of an ordinary
consumer is not to generate viewership or hits and consequently earn revenues from the impact
created by the Impugned Video. Hence, the acts of the defendant fall under the category of
‘commercial activities and not a general review of the product by an ordinary consumer. The
defendant also in his video promoted a competing product in substitution for the product of the
plaintiff and urged the viewers to stop using the plaintiffs’ product and attempted to promote two
other competing products by providing links for purchasing these products from online retailers
such as amazon. Consequently, Defendant’s actions satisfy all ingredients to constitute
disparagement, slander of goods, and malicious falsehood.
11. Defendant’s Arguments
• There was no malicious intent from the defendant’s side and the purpose of the video was only
educational in nature. The defendant remarks that the plaintiff has used a trick of showing a wet
coconut alongside its product to fool consumers into thinking that its product was derived from
wet coconut instead of copra. Subsequently, the defendant’s offer to delete certain parts of the
video was made as a concession to settle the dispute and was not an admission. Upon buying
products from clicking on the link mentioned by Defendant, Defendant receives a commission from
the online site not the competitors of Plaintiff. However, Defendant’s recommendations and review
videos in the past have been made without receiving any commission. Plaintiff uses the term
‘coconut oil’ when they are selling copra oil which is of inferior quality. Statements made by
Defendant in the Impugned Video are true and constitute bona fide opinion and is guaranteed by
Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Defendant’s statement that Plaintiff’s oil’ is of an inferior
quality to other organic cold-pressed coconut oils’ is correct and per the scientific literature. Some
of the words of Defendant such as that the smell of Plaintiff’s product is akin to a dried or rotten
coconut’ were used for exaggeration and were not to be taken literally. An action for
disparagement/malicious falsehood/slander of goods can only be against a trader or a competitor.
13. Observations by single bench
• The Single Bench stated that the defendant being a ‘social media influencer’ bears a higher burden to
ensure there is a degree of truthfulness in his statements and added that a social media influencer
cannot deliver statements with the same impunity available to an ordinary person. The court on the
statements made by the defendant remarks that in the impugned Video, Defendant has made use of
forceful statements and thus has portrayed himself as an expert who has undertaken extensive research.
The literature relied upon by Defendant pertains to gauging the quality of ‘Virgin Coconut Oil’ and thus
inapplicable to the present case. The court on the question of whether the Defendant had any reason to
believe that the statements he made were true since there is material in respect of Plaintiff’s product to
demonstrate that such belief was possible. And thus, Defendant’s statements have been made with
recklessness and without caring whether they were true or false. On the defendant’s fundamental right
to free speech the court observed that Defendant has afforded no explanation for using the term ‘rotten
coconuts. Later in his video, Defendant has once again insinuated that Plaintiff’s product might be made
from poor quality coconuts.
• In an action for disparagement/malicious falsehood/slander of goods, it is irrelevant whether the
Defendant is a trader or not so long as the necessary ingredients are satisfied. Fundamental rights
cannot be abused by any individual by maligning or disparaging the product of others.
14. Observations in the Appeal by the
Division Bench
• The Appeal by Abhijeet Bhansali was allowed with some minor modifications to the video.
However, the dominant message conveyed by the video was not restricted.
• On Freedom of Speech the Division Bench stated the statements of facts or statements of opinions
or defamation, where a person asserted a matter of fact, it cannot be restrained from expressing
himself. In cases of opinions or subjective issues, different considerations apply. Whether a
statement is a fact or opinion depends upon whether the consumer can verify the statement. If
yes, the same cannot be treated as an opinion. If an opinion is based on disclosed non-defamatory
facts, action against it is not maintainable, irrespective of how unreasonable or derogatory the
opinion is. However, if an opinion is based on undisclosed or implied facts, the support of an
action depends on the understanding of the statement. If the recipient reasonably believes the
truth of an undisclosed or implied defamatory fact about the subject of the statement, the speaker
is liable for making a defamatory statement. Admittedly, Respondent’s product is not extracted
from fresh coconut oil and it uses an expeller pressed process. This results in a yellowish tint and a
strong odour. Thus, Respondent accepts statements of facts made by Appellant that the suggested
claim of Respondent that its oil is extracted from fresh coconut, is false.
15. • The Division Bench also opined on the errors made in the decision of the single bench. Learned
Single Bench has wrongly held that the Appellant has compared Respondent’s product with an
unknown product which was a virgin coconut oil. The Single Bench has overlooked the fact that
even the Respondent had claimed its oil to be virgin coconut oil. The only error committed by the
Appellant is to refer to the exemplar oil as organic coconut oil because the reference is to virgin
coconut oil, but this is a trivial error and does not mislead the viewer who would clearly
understand that the essentiality of the presentation is that Respondent’s product is not extracted
from fresh coconuts and that the expeller pressed process is used to extract the oil from Copra.
16. Comments
Social media is the perfect platform to misuse the fundamental right to speech and expression
guaranteed to every citizen of this country. While one uses this right as a defence to derogatory
statements made, they often forget that right to dignity is also a fundamental right which is at stake
because of the reckless statements and baseless accusations they make. Social media in general
these days has given people the opportunity to say whatever they want without having the fear of
being punished. There are so many websites making numerous statements starting from a water
bottle’s material to theory of mars having water content irrespective of checking the authenticity.
With intriguing thumbnails to such videos, people attract more and more likes which help them in
making easy money. While doing this, people often forget or probably choose to ignore that they
might cause harm to someone. With the concept of “influencers” on rise, everybody with a phone
has an opinion which he/she thinks would be an ultimatum if shared. In the present case, the person
posted a video about the quality of a product. Not just him, anyone and everyone has a right to do
so. But only after making sure that their accusations if any are backed by strong theories and
evidence. In the present case, he not only used wrong tests but was himself confused between two
completely different products. The biggest problem with the video is him adding his qualifications
which is one of the best ways to make the viewers believe in the statements and accusations made.
17. • The judgement was in favour of the defendants and it rightly struck down the irrelevant and highly
irresponsible statements made by the defendants. I, however, feel this was not it. The defendant
should have been asked to pay compensation to teach a lesson to people who intentionally or
unintentionally spread false statements and fake theories. However, the plaintiff had not asked for
compensation but asked for the video to be taken down. This was ordered by the court and justice
was given in favour of the plaintiff. The only addition the court could have made was to make him
record another video stating that the theory he had put forth was not true. The defendant in his
contentions had raised this point saying that the plaintiff may make a counter video justifying their
facts. This should have been the defendant’s task to do as he was solely responsible for the chaos
created and there is every possibility that viewers believed in his theory and made videos
professing the same. The court could have ordered for the judgement to be widely publicised.