PAR     PARTICIPATORY
      ACTION RESEARCH
      LAUREN MORLEY • SABRINA ALLETSON • MORIAH VICE
       OKSANA KRAVETS • BRIGIT O’REGAN • ZACH ASHBEE
PAR     PARTICIPATORY
      ACTION RESEARCH
         INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
 Participatory Action
 Research is...

 A qualitative approach that improves social
 practice by changing it and learning from the
 consequences of these changes.




                                   P A R
INTRODUCTION                            FEATURES
•   Collaborative
•   A systematic learning process involving
    planning, acting, observing, and reflecting
•   Often used when dealing with social work and
    the relationship-building process
•   Relies on participant self-education and
    consciousness so that they may plan to raise the
    quality of their lives

                                      P A R
INTRODUCTION                           KEY STEPS
1. Engage community participants
2. Clearly define the problem
3. Examine assumptions
4. Assess the needs of the group
5. Identify a research team
6. Develop an action plan
7. Develop research plan
8. Identify research question(s)
9. Create data collection strategies
10. Conduct ongoing data
   collection and analysis
11. Report findings and results
                                       P A R
INTRODUCTION                        CURRENT USES
• Education: collaboration
  between
  researchers, teachers, students
  , and/or parents
• Community engagement:
  specific phenomena (e.g.
  violence), social justice, or
  community planning
• Organizations: employees and
  managers make joint decisions
                                      P A R
INTRODUCTION                         STRENGTHS
• Empowers people to democratically develop
  practical solutions to problems that affect them
• Participants decide which problems to study
  (PAR highlights minority needs and concerns)
• Provides insight into a group's values and
  knowledge.




                                      P A R
INTRODUCTION                       WEAKNESSES
• Has no timeline: action cycles can continue
  indefinitely
• May have no research leader, resulting in
  disorganization and conflicting research
  strategies
• Can be used to manipulate




                                     P A R
INTRODUCTION                           KEY TERMS
• Social Learning: Changes in individual values and
  behaviour due to collaboration, which in turn
  influence collective culture
• Recognized Impacts: Perceptions of change due
  to PAR
• Conflict Resolution: Degree of conflict between
  participants; resolution during the process; could
  include quality of decision making.

                                      P A R
PAR     PARTICIPATORY
      ACTION RESEARCH
       DATA COLLECTION
DATA COLLECTION                        METHODS
• Methods: interviews, focus groups, surveys,
  photovoice, documents, observations, field
  notes, etc.
• Primary data sources: participants,
  stakeholders, reports, researchers, documents,
  etc.
• Secondary data sources: archival materials,
  media, statistics, etc.


                                     P A R
DATA COLLECTION                         METHODS
• Interviews, for example, are a rich source of data
  that can highlight the perceived links between
  cause and effect.
  • Disadvantages: They are time consuming and
     complex to analyze.
• Data collection must be context-
  sensitive, inductive and naturalistic.
• Researchers should not attempt to manipulate
  the process but observe it.
                                      P A R
DATA COLLECTION                             STEPS
1. Gain entry            6. Gather data
2. Collaboratively       7. Encourage
   choose a research        participants to reflect
   topic and plan data      on their assumptions
   collection.              through reflexive
3. Select participants      journaling
4. Clarify participant   8. Perform preliminary
   roles                    analysis, which leads
5. Develop data             back to step 2
   collection tools
                                     P A R
DATA COLLECTION                      KEY TERMS
• Transparency: Both internal, whereby
  participants understand how decisions are made;
  and external, whereby observers can audit the
  process.
• Emergent Knowledge: Influence of local
  knowledge on the outcome of the research.




                                    P A R
Par 2

Par 2

  • 1.
    PAR PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH LAUREN MORLEY • SABRINA ALLETSON • MORIAH VICE OKSANA KRAVETS • BRIGIT O’REGAN • ZACH ASHBEE
  • 2.
    PAR PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH INTRODUCTION
  • 3.
    INTRODUCTION Participatory Action Research is... A qualitative approach that improves social practice by changing it and learning from the consequences of these changes. P A R
  • 4.
    INTRODUCTION FEATURES • Collaborative • A systematic learning process involving planning, acting, observing, and reflecting • Often used when dealing with social work and the relationship-building process • Relies on participant self-education and consciousness so that they may plan to raise the quality of their lives P A R
  • 5.
    INTRODUCTION KEY STEPS 1. Engage community participants 2. Clearly define the problem 3. Examine assumptions 4. Assess the needs of the group 5. Identify a research team 6. Develop an action plan 7. Develop research plan 8. Identify research question(s) 9. Create data collection strategies 10. Conduct ongoing data collection and analysis 11. Report findings and results P A R
  • 6.
    INTRODUCTION CURRENT USES • Education: collaboration between researchers, teachers, students , and/or parents • Community engagement: specific phenomena (e.g. violence), social justice, or community planning • Organizations: employees and managers make joint decisions P A R
  • 7.
    INTRODUCTION STRENGTHS • Empowers people to democratically develop practical solutions to problems that affect them • Participants decide which problems to study (PAR highlights minority needs and concerns) • Provides insight into a group's values and knowledge. P A R
  • 8.
    INTRODUCTION WEAKNESSES • Has no timeline: action cycles can continue indefinitely • May have no research leader, resulting in disorganization and conflicting research strategies • Can be used to manipulate P A R
  • 9.
    INTRODUCTION KEY TERMS • Social Learning: Changes in individual values and behaviour due to collaboration, which in turn influence collective culture • Recognized Impacts: Perceptions of change due to PAR • Conflict Resolution: Degree of conflict between participants; resolution during the process; could include quality of decision making. P A R
  • 10.
    PAR PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH DATA COLLECTION
  • 11.
    DATA COLLECTION METHODS • Methods: interviews, focus groups, surveys, photovoice, documents, observations, field notes, etc. • Primary data sources: participants, stakeholders, reports, researchers, documents, etc. • Secondary data sources: archival materials, media, statistics, etc. P A R
  • 12.
    DATA COLLECTION METHODS • Interviews, for example, are a rich source of data that can highlight the perceived links between cause and effect. • Disadvantages: They are time consuming and complex to analyze. • Data collection must be context- sensitive, inductive and naturalistic. • Researchers should not attempt to manipulate the process but observe it. P A R
  • 13.
    DATA COLLECTION STEPS 1. Gain entry 6. Gather data 2. Collaboratively 7. Encourage choose a research participants to reflect topic and plan data on their assumptions collection. through reflexive 3. Select participants journaling 4. Clarify participant 8. Perform preliminary roles analysis, which leads 5. Develop data back to step 2 collection tools P A R
  • 14.
    DATA COLLECTION KEY TERMS • Transparency: Both internal, whereby participants understand how decisions are made; and external, whereby observers can audit the process. • Emergent Knowledge: Influence of local knowledge on the outcome of the research. P A R