1. NAME:- SEJAL R PARMAR
SEM:- 2
ENROLLMENT NO:- 2069108420190033
YEAR:- 2018-2020
EMAIL:- sejalpamar095@gmail.com
PAPER:- LITERARY THEORY AND CRITICISM-
WESTERN POTICS-1
SUBMITTED TO:- DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, MKBU
2. One of the twentieth
century's major poet.
“ we can hardly make the
word agreeable to English
ears without this
comfortable reference to
the reassuring science of
archaeology.
3. British poet
Playwright
Essayist
Publisher
Social and literary critic.
4. Objective correlation
Theory of Impersonality
Concept of Tradition
Disassociation of Sensibility
ESSAYS:
Traditional and individual talent(1919)
Hamlet and his problem(1920)
Metaphysical poets(1921)
5. “Tradition and individual talent” (1919) is an essay
written by the poet and literary critic T. S. ELIOT.
The essay was first published in “The Egoist”(1919)
and later in Eliot's first book of criticism, “The
sacred wood” (1920).
Tradition and Individual talent is one of the more
well known work that Eliot produced in his critic
capacity.
It formulates Eliot's influential conception of the
relationship between the poet and the literary
tradition which proceeds him.
6. Part 1:- Eliot's concept of tradition
Part 2:- Eliot's theory of impersonality of
poetry
Part 3:- Summary
7. THE SIGNIFICANCE OF TRADITION
1. Tradition doesn’t mean a blind adherence to
the ways of the previous generation.
2. Tradition cannot be inherited; it can only be
obtained by hard labor.
3. Tradition can only obtained by those who
have historical sense.
8. Recognition of the continuity of literature
A critical judgment as to which of the writers of
the past continue to be significant in the
present.
A knowledge of the significant writers obtained
through painstaking effort.
9. Tradition isn't anything fixed and static;
it is constantly changing, growing and
becoming different from what it is.
When a new work is created, the whole literary
tradition is modified.
The relationship between the past and the present is
not one-sided; it is reciprocal.
The past directs the present, and is itself modified
and altered by the present.
10. The work of art a poet in the present is
to be compared and contrasted with
works of the past….
This judgment doesn’t mean “good” or “bad”.
The comparison is for knowing the facts about
the new works of art.
The comparison is for the purpose of analysis
and forming batter understanding of the new.
11. It doesn’t mean to know the past as a whole
without any discrimination.
The sense of tradition doesn’t mean that the
poet should know only a few poets whom he
admires, a particular age, or period which he
likes. This is a sign of immaturity and
inexperience.
12. The artist must surrender himself to tradition.
He must allow his poetic sensibility to be
shaped and modified by the past.
His emotions and feeling must be
depersonalized; he must be as impersonal and
objective as a scientist.
The poets personality is merely a medium; as a
catalytic agent, or a receptacle in which
chemical reaction take place.
13. ‘it is not the “greatness”, the intensity of
emotions, the components, but the
intensity of the artistic process, the
pressure, under which the fusion takes
place, that accounts.’
The more intense the artistic process, the greater
the poem.
The mind of the poet is like the catalytic agent.
It is merely a medium of combination.
14. ELIOT CONCLUDES:
“poetry is not a turning loose of emotion, but an
escape from emotion; it is not the expression of
personality, but escape from personality.”
Eliot doesn’t deny personality or emotion to the
poet. Only he must depersonalize his emotions.
The poet can know what is to be done if he acquires
a sense of tradition; the historic sense which makes
him conscious not only of the present but also of
the present moment of the past.