The Moodle Quiz at the Open University:
how we use it & how that helps students
Tim Hunt, Information Technology
MoodleMoot Dublin 2015
The Moodle Quiz at the Open University:
how we use it & how that helps students
Tim Hunt, Information Technology
MoodleMoot Dublin 2015
many dedicated
OU teaching staff
Alternate titles
Lots of interesting graphs
The scholarship of teaching and learning in practice
Overall use
It matters
End of module survey results
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
KPI 01: Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of this module.
Q33 Clear understanding of what was required to complete the assessed work
Q34 the assessment activities supported my learning
It makes a difference
Level 3 physics (SM358)
SM358 assessment tasks
0 TMAs 1 TMA 2 TMAs 3 TMAs 4 TMAs
0 iCMAs
1 iCMA
2 iCMAs
3 iCMAs
4 iCMAs
5 iCMAs
6 iCMAs
Students completing tasks
0 TMAs 1 TMA 2 TMAs 3 TMAs 4 TMAs
0 iCMAs 11.6% 3.4% 1.5% 0.5% 0.5%
1 iCMA 1.5% 1.0%
2 iCMAs 1.5% 2.4% 1.5%
3 iCMAs 1.5%
4 iCMAs 5.3% 2.4%
5 iCMAs 0.5% 3.9% 5.8% 8.2%
6 iCMAs 0.5% 0.5% 5.8% 5.8% 34.3%
Average exam scores
0 TMAs 1 TMA 2 TMAs 3 TMAs 4 TMAs
0 iCMAs 6.0
1 iCMA
2 iCMAs 17.0 24.0
3 iCMAs 60.0
4 iCMAs 43.7 62.0
5 iCMAs 23.0 46.0 62.6 69.5
6 iCMAs 35.3 60.8 77.5
Exam scores vs prediction
0 TMAs 1 TMA 2 TMAs 3 TMAs 4 TMAs
0 iCMAs −20.8
1 iCMA
2 iCMAs −43.9 −27.5
3 iCMAs −9.0
4 iCMAs −15.6 +1.8
5 iCMAs −3.8 −11.1 +1.4 +2.4
6 iCMAs −17.1 +3.4 +4.6
Changing assessment type
T184 robotics & meaning of life
Before
10% mid-course iCMA
90% final written EMA
part 1 short-answer
part 2 programming
& essays
After
10% mid-course iCMA
30% final iCMA
60% final written EMA
Module completion rates
T184 completion rates
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
May
Oct
Introduction of
CME
T184 completion rates
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
May
Oct
Introduction of
CME
Module completion rates
T184 completion rates
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
May
Oct
Introduction of
CME
Module completion rates
Deadlines
SM358 iCMA51 submit date
2010 advisory deadline
SM358 iCMA51 submit date
2010 advisory deadline
2012 hard deadline
Grades
Optional quizzes
Compulsory quizzes
Do students read feedback?
Interactive with multiple tries
Same question in two quizzes
Can computers grade sentences?
Spoiler: Yes!
How good are humans?
Question Number of
responses in
analysis
Percentage of responses where
the human markers were in
agreement with question author
Percentage of
responses where
computer marking
was in agreement
with question
author
Range for the
6 human
markers
Mean of the 6
human
markers
A 189 97.4 – 100. 98.9 99.5
B 248 83.9 – 97.2 91.9 97.6
C 150 80.7 – 94.0 86.9 94.7
D 129 91.5 – 98.4 96.7 97.6
E 92 92.4 – 97.8 95.1 98.9
F 129 86.0 – 97.7 90.8 97.7
G 132 66.7 – 90.2 83.2 89.4
Comparing three algorithms
Question Number of
responses in
analysis
Percentage of responses where computer marking
was in agreement with question author
Computational
linguistics
Algorithmic manipulation of
keywords
IAT Pattern-match Regular
Expressions
A 189 99.5 99.5 98.9
B 248 97.6 98.8 98.0
C 150 94.7 94.7 90.7
D 129 97.6 96.1 97.7
E 92 98.9 96.7 96.7
F 129 97.7 88.4 89.2
G 132 89.4 87.9 88.6
Summary
References
• Overall iCMA usage numbers collated by Phil Butcher.
• End of module server results from Student Analytics in the Institute of Educational
Technology via Linda Price.
• SM358 data from John Bolton
• T184 data from Jon Rosewell
• SDK125, S141, S151 & S240 data from Sally Jordan
• Jordan, Sally (2014). Using e-assessment to learn about students and learning.
International Journal of e-Assessment, 4(1)
• Jordan, Sally (2014). Adult science learners’ mathematical mistakes: an analysis
of responses to computer-marked questions. European Journal of Science and
Mathematics Education, 2(2) pp. 63–86.
• Jordan, Sally (2012). Short-answer e-assessment questions : five years on. In:
2012 International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, 10-11 July 2012,
Southampton.
• Pattern-match question type for Moodle
https://moodle.org/plugins/view/qtype_pmatch
Key points
Getting the assessment right is important
Online quizzes can be powerful learning tools
Dig into the data and you can learn
• Is this quiz working?
• What are my students’ misconceptions?
Computers can grade much more than multi-choice
but only on behalf of a teacher
Want more? I’m giving this talk again at #iMoot15

The Moodle Quiz at the Open University: how we use it & how that helps students

  • 1.
    The Moodle Quizat the Open University: how we use it & how that helps students Tim Hunt, Information Technology MoodleMoot Dublin 2015
  • 2.
    The Moodle Quizat the Open University: how we use it & how that helps students Tim Hunt, Information Technology MoodleMoot Dublin 2015 many dedicated OU teaching staff
  • 3.
    Alternate titles Lots ofinteresting graphs The scholarship of teaching and learning in practice
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    End of modulesurvey results 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% KPI 01: Overall, I am satisfied with the quality of this module. Q33 Clear understanding of what was required to complete the assessed work Q34 the assessment activities supported my learning
  • 7.
    It makes adifference
  • 8.
  • 9.
    SM358 assessment tasks 0TMAs 1 TMA 2 TMAs 3 TMAs 4 TMAs 0 iCMAs 1 iCMA 2 iCMAs 3 iCMAs 4 iCMAs 5 iCMAs 6 iCMAs
  • 10.
    Students completing tasks 0TMAs 1 TMA 2 TMAs 3 TMAs 4 TMAs 0 iCMAs 11.6% 3.4% 1.5% 0.5% 0.5% 1 iCMA 1.5% 1.0% 2 iCMAs 1.5% 2.4% 1.5% 3 iCMAs 1.5% 4 iCMAs 5.3% 2.4% 5 iCMAs 0.5% 3.9% 5.8% 8.2% 6 iCMAs 0.5% 0.5% 5.8% 5.8% 34.3%
  • 11.
    Average exam scores 0TMAs 1 TMA 2 TMAs 3 TMAs 4 TMAs 0 iCMAs 6.0 1 iCMA 2 iCMAs 17.0 24.0 3 iCMAs 60.0 4 iCMAs 43.7 62.0 5 iCMAs 23.0 46.0 62.6 69.5 6 iCMAs 35.3 60.8 77.5
  • 12.
    Exam scores vsprediction 0 TMAs 1 TMA 2 TMAs 3 TMAs 4 TMAs 0 iCMAs −20.8 1 iCMA 2 iCMAs −43.9 −27.5 3 iCMAs −9.0 4 iCMAs −15.6 +1.8 5 iCMAs −3.8 −11.1 +1.4 +2.4 6 iCMAs −17.1 +3.4 +4.6
  • 13.
  • 14.
    T184 robotics &meaning of life Before 10% mid-course iCMA 90% final written EMA part 1 short-answer part 2 programming & essays After 10% mid-course iCMA 30% final iCMA 60% final written EMA
  • 15.
    Module completion rates T184completion rates 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 May Oct Introduction of CME
  • 16.
    T184 completion rates 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 20042005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 May Oct Introduction of CME Module completion rates
  • 17.
    T184 completion rates 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 20042005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 May Oct Introduction of CME Module completion rates
  • 18.
  • 19.
    SM358 iCMA51 submitdate 2010 advisory deadline
  • 20.
    SM358 iCMA51 submitdate 2010 advisory deadline 2012 hard deadline
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
    Same question intwo quizzes
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    How good arehumans? Question Number of responses in analysis Percentage of responses where the human markers were in agreement with question author Percentage of responses where computer marking was in agreement with question author Range for the 6 human markers Mean of the 6 human markers A 189 97.4 – 100. 98.9 99.5 B 248 83.9 – 97.2 91.9 97.6 C 150 80.7 – 94.0 86.9 94.7 D 129 91.5 – 98.4 96.7 97.6 E 92 92.4 – 97.8 95.1 98.9 F 129 86.0 – 97.7 90.8 97.7 G 132 66.7 – 90.2 83.2 89.4
  • 30.
    Comparing three algorithms QuestionNumber of responses in analysis Percentage of responses where computer marking was in agreement with question author Computational linguistics Algorithmic manipulation of keywords IAT Pattern-match Regular Expressions A 189 99.5 99.5 98.9 B 248 97.6 98.8 98.0 C 150 94.7 94.7 90.7 D 129 97.6 96.1 97.7 E 92 98.9 96.7 96.7 F 129 97.7 88.4 89.2 G 132 89.4 87.9 88.6
  • 31.
  • 32.
    References • Overall iCMAusage numbers collated by Phil Butcher. • End of module server results from Student Analytics in the Institute of Educational Technology via Linda Price. • SM358 data from John Bolton • T184 data from Jon Rosewell • SDK125, S141, S151 & S240 data from Sally Jordan • Jordan, Sally (2014). Using e-assessment to learn about students and learning. International Journal of e-Assessment, 4(1) • Jordan, Sally (2014). Adult science learners’ mathematical mistakes: an analysis of responses to computer-marked questions. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2) pp. 63–86. • Jordan, Sally (2012). Short-answer e-assessment questions : five years on. In: 2012 International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference, 10-11 July 2012, Southampton. • Pattern-match question type for Moodle https://moodle.org/plugins/view/qtype_pmatch
  • 33.
    Key points Getting theassessment right is important Online quizzes can be powerful learning tools Dig into the data and you can learn • Is this quiz working? • What are my students’ misconceptions? Computers can grade much more than multi-choice but only on behalf of a teacher Want more? I’m giving this talk again at #iMoot15