The document discusses different philosophical approaches to evaluating the validity of statements or propositions based on the types of questions asked. Gottfried Leibniz focuses on rational justification independent of empirical data. John Locke focuses on empirical data and statistical analysis. Immanuel Kant looks for a combination of data and theoretical justification. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel examines alternative views and the potential for synthesis. Peter Singer considers whether the right questions are being asked and perspectives considered. Mitroff and Turoff note that each approach reflects a different way of understanding communication and that many other approaches exist.
The document discusses different philosophical approaches to evaluating the validity of statements or propositions based on the types of questions asked. Gottfried Leibniz focuses on rational justification independent of empirical data. John Locke focuses on empirical data and statistical analysis. Immanuel Kant looks for a combination of data and theoretical justification. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel examines alternative views and the potential for synthesis. Peter Singer considers whether the right questions are being asked and perspectives considered. Mitroff and Turoff note that each approach reflects a different way of understanding communication and that many other approaches exist.
The document discusses using a Delphi method to gather feedback on traffic CO2 policy scenarios in Finland. It provides guidance on developing the survey, analyzing the results, and conducting follow-up interviews. The key points are:
1) Cluster the responses to group similar viewpoints and identify probable and preferable futures. This revealed responses with similar quantitative statements but different qualitative arguments.
2) Conduct argumentative interviews in the second round by playing the role of counterargument to elicit deeper discussion, but avoid personal bias.
3) The method does not force consistency but reduces oversimplification and aids interpretation, though it may not be suitable for lay people. Analysis of qualitative arguments enriches understanding of scenarios.
"Käsikirjoitus" Delfoi-pedagogiikkaa käsittelevään videoon, jonka Metodix Oy julkaisee 1.11.2019. Alkuperäinen dokumentti tekstien kera öytyy osoitteesta http://bit.ly/33IJsBP.
XAMK: Delphi prosessin neljä vaihetta 2018Hannu Linturi
Kalvosarja nelivaiheisen Delfoi-prosessin toteutukseen Mikkelissä ja verkossa syksyllä 2018 . Kalvosarjaa on kokonaisuudessaan käytettävissä Google Slidesissa http://bit.ly/2UCNecs . Kalvosarjaan liittyy myös nelisosainen video-ohjesarja https://www.edelphi.org/help.page .
The document discusses using a Delphi method to gather feedback on traffic CO2 policy scenarios in Finland. It provides guidance on developing the survey, analyzing the results, and conducting follow-up interviews. The key points are:
1) Cluster the responses to group similar viewpoints and identify probable and preferable futures. This revealed responses with similar quantitative statements but different qualitative arguments.
2) Conduct argumentative interviews in the second round by playing the role of counterargument to elicit deeper discussion, but avoid personal bias.
3) The method does not force consistency but reduces oversimplification and aids interpretation, though it may not be suitable for lay people. Analysis of qualitative arguments enriches understanding of scenarios.
"Käsikirjoitus" Delfoi-pedagogiikkaa käsittelevään videoon, jonka Metodix Oy julkaisee 1.11.2019. Alkuperäinen dokumentti tekstien kera öytyy osoitteesta http://bit.ly/33IJsBP.
XAMK: Delphi prosessin neljä vaihetta 2018Hannu Linturi
Kalvosarja nelivaiheisen Delfoi-prosessin toteutukseen Mikkelissä ja verkossa syksyllä 2018 . Kalvosarjaa on kokonaisuudessaan käytettävissä Google Slidesissa http://bit.ly/2UCNecs . Kalvosarjaan liittyy myös nelisosainen video-ohjesarja https://www.edelphi.org/help.page .