This document summarizes oral history in Canada. It notes that oral histories allow people who are often not heard, like immigrants, to share their voices. While many believe immigrants come to Canada for a better life, which is true, oral histories provide a new perspective showing that immigrants do not instantly have better economic and social lives. Oral history captures personal experiences with immigration and life in Canada that contradict general beliefs. It allows immigrants to share their personal experiences with immigration and new lives in Canada in a way other research cannot.

1. Oral History In Canada
The use of audio records for this project is significantly important as audio records allows people to heard the voices of those who are not heard, in
this specific case, it is the voices of immigrants that are heard. Often, there is a general belief that people come to Canada for a better life, which is
true. However, people also assume that immigrants instantly have a better life in an economic and social way, which is not true. This is why oral
history is important in this situation. Oral history will allow immigrants to share their personal experience with immigration and new life in Canada.
This will allow the providing of a new perspective on immigration and even contradict the general beliefs on immigrations thanks to the use of oral
history....show more content...
Oral history can capture the essence of a person that other forms of historical research cannot as the interviewer has the ability to ``connect`` with the
person and truly understand the impact of a specific event due to the detailed personal experience told by the interviewee
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Oral History Reflection
One of the things I am passionate about is communicating and learning about people and their stories. Which is the sole reason why my major
after college is going to be business marketing. That's probably why my job is to ask people questions, edify their problems, and to see if my
company can help resolve their problems. I'm curious by nature and like to know the story behind the person which is why the Oral History
Report was my most prized paper as I got to spend quality time with my grandfather and got to experience from his point of view throughout
history. I tend to keep my interview like a normal conversation so it does not feel like I was interrogating him. I accomplished this goal by simply
asking him questions that brought up others event without me asking for them. The most rewarding aspect of conducting the interviews with my
grandfather, was to put my shoes into his so I could experience history first hand. I am not that close to my paternal grandparents as we do not live
under the same roof or visit each other so doing this Oral History Report with my grandfather gave me the opportunity to not only to spend quality
time to know him better, but also to hear his view on politics as he not only knows history but also has experienced it. I never realized that how he
became the man he was or how tough life had treated him. Doing this meeting managed me the opportunity to learn things about him I never knew.
For instance, I never knew my grandfather was a third grade dropout or that he was drafted to the Vietnam War. I was shocked as I placed my
–self in
his shoes and imagined leaving the comfort of my home towards the battlefield. I also learned that my grandfather dropped out of school to provide
for his family, he travelled the country all alone to land a job and to replace the income that they had before his father passed away. The other thing I
discovered compensating from this meeting was figuring out how prominent and regarded my grandfather still is in the community. I realized just
how much of his life he was not living because of the war. I got a greater appreciation and respect not only for him, but for all veterans that fought in
battles and war. Standing in the sidelines is easy so we
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Oral History Interview
The individual I chose to interview for my oral history project was actually the Vice Principal of my school and his name was Mr. Clair. During
our interview, he relayed to me the experiences he went during the Civil Rights Movement. What I was told during this interview was surprisingly
different from what I was expecting, I was expecting to hear stories about how my interviewee witnessed many people of color being abused and
segregated to the extremes. However, what I heard was a bit calmer than that and surprisingly, did not involve much violence at all. Mr. Clair told me
about how he was only a young boy, around ten years old when the civil rights movement began to take off and in his school the main reaction he had
was utter dismay. It was shocking and...show more content...
This was amusing to me because the Civil Rights Movement was having a direct impact on his life. This forced him to make the choice to either
support this movement that was occurring in his school or just go on with his life. Being the young boy he was, my interviewee didn't really have a
reaction to this decision, he did what his parents decided to do. That isn't surprising because most children usually follow their parents, however; what
made this so interesting was the fact that his parents made the decision not to do anything about the actions going on around them. If I was put in this
same situation I would probably do the same thing my interviewee did, just stay neutral and don't actively participate in any actions against the Civil
Rights Movement. I would do this because I am a person who tends to mind my own business unless something actually has an effect on my life. In this
situation, having colored kids leave my school isn't really something that would hinder the quality of my education, therefor; causing me to do
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

4. Oral History At Los Alamos
What kind of public history issues does an individual encounter daily at their local community's historical society? The public history issues that I
have come across in my professional experience include topics as memory, oral histories, and the categorizing of archives. For my professional
experience hours, I am volunteering at Los Alamos' local historical society, where the organization is currently conducting several oral histories and
cataloging their archives. While conducting oral histories on World War II andManhattan Project Veterans I have connected my experience to issues
such as memory. The connection to memory has caused me to form several questions on whether the experiences that these veterans were telling are
accurate accounts...show more content...
The idea of memory can relate to such examples photos, quotes, and how a landscape or town use to appear can connect to the issue of oral history.
The connection allows the historian to help those that they are interviewing recall on their experiences. The connection between the two has caused me
to realize that primary accounts can be very subjective. About previous coursework, I learned that oral histories should subjectively view these
accounts as the recollection of an event by the individual may have faded with age. The concepts of memory and oral history have been an active issue
in my experience. One instance that I have noticed when interviewing several Manhattan Project Veterans is their recollection of dates, which revolve
around certain historical events as the Trinity Test. In one interview, a veteran informed me that he began working in Los Alamos on the Manhattan
Project in 1942 and that the Trinity Test took place in the June of 1945. The interview provides an excellent example of how a primary source's
account of an event can fade over time as the laboratory at Los Alamos did not open until 1943, and the test at the Trinity site took place in July of
1945. Learning from the interview, I immediately connect this to my prior coursework bringing photos of the Los Alamos area during the 1940s to my
next oral history interview.
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

5. History Primary Sources
When writing a paper is it essential to have primary sources and allow them to lead the paper. A great primary source is Oral History, but two issues
with using oral history is first collecting accurate history and then interpreting the history. Oral history is when someone records the stories told by
another person about something that they witnessed. "Oral history that reveals a narrator's strong feelings and emotions will engender strong affective
resonances in listeners and thus be retained.." (McHugh, 206). A personal account is powerful; the emotions that carry in the orator voices bring to
home the truth behind the dry official written forms about the events. It also helps prevent "Selective memories of the winners of the battles of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

6. Emory Oral History
Emory University, a top–ranked private institution recognized internationally for its outstanding liberal arts colleges, graduate and professional
schools, and one of the world's leading health care systems, is located on a beautiful campus in Atlanta, Georgia's historic Druid Hills neighborhood.
Whatever your interest in Emory, we would welcome your visit to campus.
Emory maintains an uncommon balance for an institution of its standing: our scholars and experts generate more than $572 million in research funding
annually while also maintaining a traditional emphasis on teaching. The University is enriched by collaboration among its schools, centers, and partners
as well as by the legacy and energy of Atlanta.
The 2015 Annual Report demonstrates...show more content...
Once a small university in a small town, we are now the premier research and educational institution in the thriving Inland Southern California region.
Explore our history through the links below.
.
Timeline
View the highlights of the history of UC Riverside.
.
Oral History Project
In the late 1990s and early 2000s interviews with early UCR leaders and pioneers were conducted to create an oral history of the campus.
Contributors include Ivan and Birk Hinderaker, Concha Rivera, Hank Carney, Michael Reagan, George Zentmyer, Arthur Campbell Turner and Howard
H. Hays.
.
Past Chancellors
Dynamic leadership has been the hallmark of the provosts and chancellors who have led UC Riverside. Learn the history of UCR's leadership.
UC President Janet Napolitano and UCR Chancellor Kim A. Wilcox made two appearances in the Inland Empire Thursday (April 14), discussing the
value of a college education and highlighting the affordability and accessibility of UC for California students and their families. The visits to Eleanor
Roosevelt High School in Eastvale and Chaffey College in Rancho Cucamonga are part of a statewide effort by UC to boost the enrollment of

7. Californians by 5,000 in fall 2016 and another 5,000 by
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

8. Pros And Cons Of Oral History
Oral history has been a vital source of historical and important information since the beginning of human interaction. Recordings and one on one
interviews with someone who lived through a certain time period or particular event can often provide a substantial amount of information and
evidences on a subject that one may be researching. Unfortunately oral history does has its flaws, and it does not always provide the best source of
information. Often information from direct interviews and other forms of oral history can be misinterpreted and inaccurate. There are quite a few pros
and cons when using oral history as a source of evidence. These pros includes first–hand accounts of a certain event, person, and/or time period, next
access to information not available in books, articles, or journals, and finally oral history allows for different views and opinions on a subject matter
the opportunity to be heard that otherwise wouldn't. There also are several cons when using oral history as a source of evidence. As mention earlier
information from oral history can and has often been misinterpreted and inaccurate. Another con includes biases and ideology differences effecting
personal accounts of an event or person. The final con is the creditability of the actually source. In the Hochschild book and the interview with Stalin's
daughter, these pros and cons are present. Having a first–hand account of a historical event or person can be extremely useful. Someone from a
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

9. Catherine Troup Oral History
1.Oral History has gone through a complex evolution in the professionalization of history. Green and Troup articulate that from the 1960's on, oral
history became known as "unreliable and tainted by personal subjectivity." However, at the same time, oral history saw a revival with the arrival of
New History. Green and Troup articulate, "history from bellow embraced oral history as a means for rewriting history from the perspective of the
marginalized or oppressed." This opens up the discussion of individual agency. Which is more important in terms of oral histories, the agency of the
subject or the interviewer? 2.In Anna Green and Katherine Troup's Houses of History, 1970's historian Ron Grele suggested that "historians needed to
understand
Get more content on HelpWriting.net