The document discusses the conflicting discourses around opening up higher education and the market-driven approach. It analyzes two texts - a UK white paper promoting competition and student choice, and an EU framework advocating open education. The white paper uses language portraying students as consumers and competition as essential, while the framework emphasizes collaboration and access. The author examines how higher education institutions must navigate these diverging discourses around marketization and openness. Research questions consider the overlap and differences between these approaches and how institutions comply with both.
Publishing Development Research and Adding ValueEve Gray
A presentation made at the UNESCO workshop on Open Access in Africa, Pretoria, 22-23 November 2010, co-sponsored by the Academy of Science of South Africa and EiFL
Promoting collaborative RD networks in morocco some elements for thoughtIlyas Azzioui
this presentation highlights some aspects related to innovation systems in development countries, dominant values and some prevalent misconceptions that should be taken into consideration when building a collaborative R&D Network in a developing country like Morocco.
Dr. Carolina Garcia Rizo: Commercializing Innovative Technologies: The US Per...FITT
This presentation was held by Dr. Carolina Garcia Rizo during the FITT conference „ICT Innovations: Research > Business > Society“ on 10 May 2011 in Brussels.
www.fitt-for-innovation.eu
The Remaking of University: What Can We Do?Left Streamed
Keynote presentation by Dr. James L. Turk, Executive Director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) at the 2014 conference "Capitalism in the Classroom: Neoliberalism, Education and Progressive Alternatives." Presentation made in Toronto, 4 April 2014.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGEIFZoAAgs
Publishing Development Research and Adding ValueEve Gray
A presentation made at the UNESCO workshop on Open Access in Africa, Pretoria, 22-23 November 2010, co-sponsored by the Academy of Science of South Africa and EiFL
Promoting collaborative RD networks in morocco some elements for thoughtIlyas Azzioui
this presentation highlights some aspects related to innovation systems in development countries, dominant values and some prevalent misconceptions that should be taken into consideration when building a collaborative R&D Network in a developing country like Morocco.
Dr. Carolina Garcia Rizo: Commercializing Innovative Technologies: The US Per...FITT
This presentation was held by Dr. Carolina Garcia Rizo during the FITT conference „ICT Innovations: Research > Business > Society“ on 10 May 2011 in Brussels.
www.fitt-for-innovation.eu
The Remaking of University: What Can We Do?Left Streamed
Keynote presentation by Dr. James L. Turk, Executive Director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) at the 2014 conference "Capitalism in the Classroom: Neoliberalism, Education and Progressive Alternatives." Presentation made in Toronto, 4 April 2014.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGEIFZoAAgs
"European market for online alternative finance surges"
"The European market for online alternative finance grew by 144 per cent last year to almost €3bn and could hit €7bn this year as companies look to tap new sources of capital, according to a new report.
The analysis, published on Monday by the University of Cambridge Judge Business School and professional services firm EY, reveals how what was once a niche market has become a small sector that is still experiencing rapid growth." (ft.com)
#marketplacelendingrevolution
Global Challenge, International Opportunity: Rehabilitation, Quality, Inclu...Alan Bruce
Presentation at NCRE Fall Conference in Washington, DC in November 2014. Focus on global dimesnions of rehabilitation education and international disability rights in professional best practice.
Presentation of Beyond Current Horizons programme in relation to non formal learning for the UK Youth, St George's Hall, Futurelab event 'Vision not Division'
Open Educational Resources: Education for the World? (Richter & McPherson 2012)Richter Thomas
Pre-Publish Version of: Richter, T. & McPherson M. (2012). Open Educational Resources: Education for the World? Distance Education, 33(2), pp. 201-219.
The uk's key information set was it really needed and what was its real purposeThe University of Hull
An Unnecessary KIS? The UK’s Key Information Set, was it Really needed and What was its Real Purpose?
This paper provides a critical analysis of the United Kingdom’s higher education Key Information
Set (KIS), which was implemented following the 2011 UK White Paper ‘Students at the Heart of the System’. It argues that one of the central tenets of the KIS – providing information that
students within a free market can make an informed choice and, through this process of consumer choice improve the quality of teaching, is untenable because a central component of the KIS, the National Student Survey (NSS), is unreliable when used for comparing university courses. Further,it argues that the KIS reified a neoliberal perspective about the worth and value of higher education qualification, positioning it as a commodity of value only to the paying individual rather than being
something of value to society as a whole. It will be of particular interest to academics and policy
makers from outside of the United Kingdom, where governmental and regulatory agencies may be implementing similar policies
The Future of Open Science and How to Stop itLeslie Chan
Presentation at the Open Science panel at the launch of Steps Latina America. The talk attempts to situate the rational and objectives of the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network within the broader landscape of discourse on "openness". While recognizing the potential benefits of openness, it is important to keep in mind the existing structural inequality in global scientific knowledge production and circulation and reflect on the needs to challenge this power asymmetry as a starting point for further understanding on how open science may contribute to development challenges.
"European market for online alternative finance surges"
"The European market for online alternative finance grew by 144 per cent last year to almost €3bn and could hit €7bn this year as companies look to tap new sources of capital, according to a new report.
The analysis, published on Monday by the University of Cambridge Judge Business School and professional services firm EY, reveals how what was once a niche market has become a small sector that is still experiencing rapid growth." (ft.com)
#marketplacelendingrevolution
Global Challenge, International Opportunity: Rehabilitation, Quality, Inclu...Alan Bruce
Presentation at NCRE Fall Conference in Washington, DC in November 2014. Focus on global dimesnions of rehabilitation education and international disability rights in professional best practice.
Presentation of Beyond Current Horizons programme in relation to non formal learning for the UK Youth, St George's Hall, Futurelab event 'Vision not Division'
Open Educational Resources: Education for the World? (Richter & McPherson 2012)Richter Thomas
Pre-Publish Version of: Richter, T. & McPherson M. (2012). Open Educational Resources: Education for the World? Distance Education, 33(2), pp. 201-219.
The uk's key information set was it really needed and what was its real purposeThe University of Hull
An Unnecessary KIS? The UK’s Key Information Set, was it Really needed and What was its Real Purpose?
This paper provides a critical analysis of the United Kingdom’s higher education Key Information
Set (KIS), which was implemented following the 2011 UK White Paper ‘Students at the Heart of the System’. It argues that one of the central tenets of the KIS – providing information that
students within a free market can make an informed choice and, through this process of consumer choice improve the quality of teaching, is untenable because a central component of the KIS, the National Student Survey (NSS), is unreliable when used for comparing university courses. Further,it argues that the KIS reified a neoliberal perspective about the worth and value of higher education qualification, positioning it as a commodity of value only to the paying individual rather than being
something of value to society as a whole. It will be of particular interest to academics and policy
makers from outside of the United Kingdom, where governmental and regulatory agencies may be implementing similar policies
The Future of Open Science and How to Stop itLeslie Chan
Presentation at the Open Science panel at the launch of Steps Latina America. The talk attempts to situate the rational and objectives of the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network within the broader landscape of discourse on "openness". While recognizing the potential benefits of openness, it is important to keep in mind the existing structural inequality in global scientific knowledge production and circulation and reflect on the needs to challenge this power asymmetry as a starting point for further understanding on how open science may contribute to development challenges.
Reflections on sustaining Open Educational Resources: an institutional case s...eLearning Papers
Author: Andy Lane.
This paper reviews some of the literature on the sustainability of Open Educational Resources (OER) and what it has to say about successful or sustainable open content projects on the internet.
Educational technology and the war on public educationRichard Hall
I'm presenting at the University of Lincoln's Centre for Educational Research and Development conference on Thursday June 7. I'll be speaking about Educational technology and the war on public education.
Technology and co-operative practice against the neoliberal universityRichard Hall
Slides for my presentation at the CAPPE, Neoliberalism and Everyday Life conference on 4 September 2014 http://arts.brighton.ac.uk/research/cappe/conferences/conferences/annual-conference-neoliberalism-and-everyday-life
As more and more countries race to develop their knowledge economies, internationalise their education sectors, and encourage their young citizens to study abroad, the role of international education agents in recruiting has never been more important… or scrutinised. This is an extract from the 2014 winter issue of European Association for International Education's member magazine, EAIE Forum http://ow.ly/VQo2h. Become an EAIE member to access top-notch resources on a wide range of internationalisation topics. http://ow.ly/VQmqO.
Similar to Opening up Higher Education against the policy backdrop of the 'knowledge economy': navigating the conflicting discourses (20)
Towards a ThirdSpace: designing an inclusive open online learning ecosystemwitthaus
Presentation by Gabi Witthaus and Marwa Belghazi at MOONLITE workshop: Reaching out - Open Digital Learning for Disadvantaged Communities, University of Wolverhampton, 27 March 2019
Action Research in a Community of Practice: from Disciplinary Teaching to Sch...witthaus
Workshop co-presented with Keith Pond at the Chartered Association of Business Schools #LTSE2017 in Bristol, 25 April 2017. Developed in collaboration with the L'boro SBE Community of Practice founders, Chris WIlson and Alex WIlson.
OpenCred Study – Recognition of open learning in Europe: some issues for inst...witthaus
Slides from a European University Association (EUA) Webinar on 19 Nov 2014. I spoke about the OpenCred study, which is part of the EU's OpenEdu project and investigates recognition practices for non-formal, open learning in Europe. The Webinar recording is at https://connect.sunet.se/p830rtdeaki/. My bit of the session is from 22:30 to 38:29.
Presentation given on behalf of Grainne Conole at NLC2014, 8 April 2014: description of the 7Cs of Learning Design framework and some background to the concept of Learning Design.
POERUP elevator pitch: 26 countries in 26 minuteswitthaus
Presentation by POERUP team at OER13 in Nottingham - an overview of open educational resources policies worldwide, based on the POERUP project research (http://www.poerup.info)
Get up to SPEED on e-design and delivery at LSBUwitthaus
Presentation given at LSBU about SPEED project (www.tinyurl.com/speed-website), 23 Oct 2012. Also see www.tinyurl.com/lsbudecisions - collaborative document generated by the group during the session.
A workshop hosted by the South African Journal of Science aimed at postgraduate students and early career researchers with little or no experience in writing and publishing journal articles.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
MATATAG CURRICULUM: ASSESSING THE READINESS OF ELEM. PUBLIC SCHOOL TEACHERS I...NelTorrente
In this research, it concludes that while the readiness of teachers in Caloocan City to implement the MATATAG Curriculum is generally positive, targeted efforts in professional development, resource distribution, support networks, and comprehensive preparation can address the existing gaps and ensure successful curriculum implementation.
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty, In...Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Exploiting Artificial Intelligence for Empowering Researchers and Faculty,
International FDP on Fundamentals of Research in Social Sciences
at Integral University, Lucknow, 06.06.2024
By Dr. Vinod Kumar Kanvaria
Thinking of getting a dog? Be aware that breeds like Pit Bulls, Rottweilers, and German Shepherds can be loyal and dangerous. Proper training and socialization are crucial to preventing aggressive behaviors. Ensure safety by understanding their needs and always supervising interactions. Stay safe, and enjoy your furry friends!
This slide is special for master students (MIBS & MIFB) in UUM. Also useful for readers who are interested in the topic of contemporary Islamic banking.
Chapter 4 - Islamic Financial Institutions in Malaysia.pptx
Opening up Higher Education against the policy backdrop of the 'knowledge economy': navigating the conflicting discourses
1. Opening up Higher Education against the
policy backdrop of the ‘knowledge economy’:
navigating the conflicting discourses
By Gabi Witthaus
Presentation at ALT-C Conference
Liverpool University, 5 September 2017
2. Research questions
1. To what extent does the Discourse of groups arguing for a market-
driven approach to higher education overlap with, or diverge from,
that of groups who are seeking to open up education?
2. What can we deduce from this about how close or how far apart
these groups are in terms of their underlying values and
assumptions?
3. How are HEIs navigating the Discourses to both comply with
market-economy type regulations and open up education?
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
3. Big ‘D’ Discourse
Discourses as distinctive ways of speaking and listening, or writing and
reading, coupled with distinctive ways of acting in the world ‘in the
service of enacting specific socially recognizable identities’ (Gee, 2014,
p.183).
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
4. Marketization of HE and critical discourse
analysis - history
• Staff members of HEIs felt helpless to resist the ‘distasteful, highly
promotional, highly marketized’ new discursive practices in HE at the
time (Fairclough, 1993, p.159).
• He advocated use of Critical Discourse Analysis in the struggle to
develop a new ‘language’ as a key means of building resistance.
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
5. Captured by the discourse (Trowler, 2001)
Traditionalism
Social
reconstructionism
Progressivism
Managerialism
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
6. Emergence of discourse of open education
(Bozkurt et al., 2015)
Traditionalism
Social
reconstructionism
Progressivism
Managerialism
Open education
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
7. A tale of two texts
• Success as a knowledge economy: teaching excellence, social mobility
and student choice (BIS, 2016) - the White Paper explaining the
recently introduced Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF) for England
[the White Paper]
• Opening up Education: a Support Framework for Higher Education
Institutions (Inamorato Dos Santos, Punie & Muñoz, 2016) - an
advisory report by the European Union’s Joint Research Centre aimed
at governments and HEIs in Europe [the OuE Framework]
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
12. Ideational, interpersonal, textual features
• Ideational: ‘the representation and signification of the world and
experience’
• Interpersonal: ‘the constitution (establishment, negotiation,
reproduction’) of identities of participants and social and personal
relationships between them’
• Textual: the distribution of given versus new and foregrounded versus
backgrounded information
(Fairclough, 1993)
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
13. Ideational features: HE as a commercial
transaction
‘Competition between providers in any
market incentivises them to raise their
game, offering consumers a greater
choice of more innovative and better
quality products and services at lower
cost’ (White Paper, 2016, p.8)
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
14. Ideational features: open
education as a universal good
‘In the OpenEdu project, open education
is seen as a way of carrying out education,
often using digital technologies. Its aim is
to widen access and participation to
everyone by removing barriers and
making learning accessible, abundant, and
customisable for all. It offers multiple
ways of teaching and learning, building
and sharing knowledge. It also provides a
variety of access routes to formal and
non-formal education, and connects the
two’ (OuE Framework, 2016, p. 5).
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
15. A social construct with superhero properties
Hidden/ assumed:
• human actors with particular skills, acting with intent
• technologies/ resources
• institutional and political contexts
Openness ‘has become a highly charged and politicised term…’ which
‘has acquired a sheen of naturalised common sense and legitimacy, and
formed what seems to be a post-political space of apparent consensus’
(Bayne et al., 2015, p. 247).
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
16. Interpersonal features: cuddly ‘we’
‘Our universities have a paramount place in an economy driven by
knowledge and ideas. They generate the know-how and skills that fuel
our growth and provide the basis for our nation’s intellectual and
cultural success. Higher Education in the UK enjoys a world-class
reputation, with globally renowned teaching and cutting-edge research
and innovation. We have maintained our position as a world leader,
with continuing success in education exports in the face of increasing
international competition. But we must be ready for the challenges of
the future’ (White Paper, 2016, p.7).
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
17. Interpersonal features: authoritative ‘we’
‘… (I)n 2010, we took steps to enable England’s higher education
system to adjust to these new demands. In 2012, 13 years after tuition
fees were first introduced, we took the decision to put higher
education funding onto a more sustainable footing…’ (White Paper, p.8)
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
18. Interpersonal features: reasonable ‘we’ vs
soon-to-be-extinct ‘they’
‘But we must accept that there may be some providers who do not rise
to the challenge, and who therefore need or choose to close some or
all of their courses, or to exit the market completely. The possibility of
exit is a natural part of a healthy, competitive, well-functioning
market…’ (White Paper, p.10)
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
19. Interpersonal features: personification of
institutions
• ‘If a university were to decide...’ (OuE Framework, p. 8)
• ‘institutions should consider…’ (Ibid., p. 30)
• ‘Europe should act now providing the right policy framework and a
stimulus to introduce innovative learning and teaching practices in
schools, universities, vocational education and training’ (Ibid., p. 30).
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
20. Textual features: noticeable by their absence
• Teaching excellence – what is it?
• Academics mentioned three times in total…
• The White Paper cautions against allowing the development of a
‘crafty mutually convenient disengagement contract among
distracted academics and instrumentalist students’ (White Paper,
p.12), as has reportedly been seen in the American higher
education system.
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
21. Textual features: freedoms in principle (Lane,
2016) and false binaries (Oliver, 2015)
‘Through open education each and every individual, at every stage in
their lives and career development, can have appropriate and
meaningful educational opportunities available to them. These include
access to content, courses, support, assessment and certification in
ways that are flexible, and accommodate diverse needs. Barriers, as
regards for example entry or cost, are reduced or eliminated (OuE
Framework, p.5)
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
22. Some common high-frequency words
White Paper Opening up Education Framework
The market needs to be opened up (to new providers) Education needs to be opened up (to more, and more diverse, learners)
New entrants (i.e. institutions) need access to the market Learners need greater access to education
Consumers (students) primarily need protection from institutions that
may fail them, as well as support to succeed
Learners (students) need support to succeed
Competition (between institutions) is essential to ensuring high
quality delivery of HE
Collaboration (between institutions) is essential to ensuring high
quality delivery of HE - building bridges between informal, non-formal
and formal learning.
Widening participation means bringing more young people into HE Widening participation means bringing more people into lifelong
learning
Consumers (students) require information about the content of courses
- in order to be able to choose the ‘best’ institution to enrol at
Learners (students) should have access to openly-licensed content
(materials and resources for learning, including research outputs)
Recognition of new HE providers will help to stimulate competition
(between institutions) in the sector
Recognition of prior learning is an essential element in opening up HE
to all
High quality research as an indicator of the reputation and
competitiveness of an institution
Openly published research as a way of removing barriers to access to
knowledge, and broadening participation in research
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
23. Research questions 1 & 2
1. To what extent does the Discourse of groups arguing for a market-
driven approach to higher education overlap with, or diverge from,
that of groups who are seeking to open up education?
2. What can we deduce from this about how close or how far apart
these groups are in terms of their underlying values and
assumptions?
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
25. Research question 3 (on Padlet)
3. How are HEIs navigating the Discourses to both comply with market-
economy type regulations and open up education?
https://padlet.com/witthaus/altc
26. References
Bayne, S., Knox, J., and Ross, J., 2015. Open education: the need for a critical approach. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3),
pp.247–250.
Bozkurt, A., AkgunOzbek, E., Yilmazel, S., Erdogdu, E., Ucar, H., Guler, E., Sezgin, S., Karadeniz, A., Sen-Ersoy, N., Goksel-
Canbek, N., Dincer, G.D., Ari, S., and Aydin, C.H., 2015. Trends in Distance Education Research: A Content Analysis of Journals
2009-2013. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(1).
Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS). 2016. Success as a knowledge economy: teaching excellence, social mobility
and student choice. London: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/523546/bis-16-265-success-as-a-knowledge-
economy-web.pdf
Fairclough, N., 1993. Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse & Society,
4(2), pp.133–168.
Gee, J.P. 2014. How to do Discourse Analysis: A Toolkit 2nd edition, Abingdon: Routledge.
Inamorato Dos Santos, A., Punie, Y., & Muñoz, J. C. 2016. Opening up Education: a Support Framework for Higher Education
Institutions. Seville: Joint Research Centre, European Union. https://doi.org/10.2791/293408
Lane, A., 2016. Emancipation through open education: rhetoric or reality? In: P. Blessinger & T. Bliss, eds. Open Education:
International Perspectives in Higher Education. Open Book Publishers.
McLean, M. & Ashwin, P. 2017. The Quality of Learning, Teaching and Curriculum. In New Languages and Landscapes of Higher
Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oliver, M., 2015. From openness to permeability: reframing open education in terms of positive liberty in the enactment of academic
practices. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(3), pp.365–384.
Trowler, P., 2001. Captured by discourse? The socially constitutive power of higher education discourse in the UK. Organization,
8(2), pp.183–201.
A Discourse reflects people’s values and beliefs, and the identity they are assuming or choosing to portray through the language they use.
I removed words from the White Paper list that misleadingly appeared as high-frequency in the Wordle simply on the basis that they were in the document title, which was repeated on every page, but when computed as the word count minus the number of pages (84) yielded an insignificant number. (Interestingly, this deprived the White Paper list of several terms - ‘success’, ‘knowledge’, ‘economy’, ‘excellence’, ‘social’ and ‘mobility’ - that would appear from the document title to be key.)
The effect of this conflation of individuals and groups with vastly different viewpoints into a single entity in each instance is to homogenise the intended readers, obscuring many a heated debate and glossing over much unresolved conflict within senior management teams.
Apart from the false binary implied through such statements (Oliver, 2015), it is worth considering what remains unsaid behind this extract. Lane (2016) in his critique of the sometimes exaggerated emancipatory achievements of open education in the literature, notes that, ‘it is not enough to have freedoms in principle if a person (learner or teacher) does not possess the knowledge, capabilities and circumstances to exercise those freedoms. For instance, do they have the subject and/or pedagogic knowledge, the technological capabilities and support structures to create educational works, to learn from such works, or to add new knowledge to those works?’ (Lane, 2016, p.69)