1900 – 1920’s
 Base pay based on piece rate; mainly cash
compensation
 Department of Labor established
 Increased wage standardization resulted in the
beginning of job evaluation and wage structures
 Few companies offered pensions, profit sharing and
guaranteed wages to workers
 Very little government regulation and safety nets
1920’s – 1930’s
 Pay for skill appeared
 Cash compensation was primary form of employee
reward
 Government intervened with a range of social legislation
and public works programs
 Davis Bacon Act (1931) passed: required public
construction project contractors be paid "prevailing
wage"
 Social Security Act of 1935 passed
 National Labor Relations Act of 1935 passed (unions
became stronger and more prevalent)
 Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) passed
1940’s – 1950’s
• Wage system imbedded in regulated
"internal labor markets"
• Wage Stabilization Act; pay levels frozen to
control inflation and boost war production
• "Fringe benefits" were used to lessen the
effects of the freeze
• Individual incentive plans declined; pay
increases became more predictable
1960’s – 1970’s
 1963 Equal Pay Act passed
 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed
 Merit increase grids, seniority-based
increases, cost-of-living adjustment (COLA)
clauses, career progressions and ladders
supporting detailed job analysis and job
evaluation
 A greater emphasis on the external market
1980’s – 1990’s
 Greater emphasis on individual performance and
results, group incentives and team-based pay
 Compensation decisions aligned with the business
strategy and reward valued employee behaviors
 Use of broad banding pay grades increased
 Teamwork and success sharing
 Individualized variable pay based on performance
 More strategic pay decisions
 Intense competition for highly skilled workers
1990’s – 2000
 Great economic expansion
 Intense competition for highly mobile skilled work
force created stronger emphasis on
attraction/retention of key employees
 Increased use of broad-based equity programs,
profit-sharing and pay for performance
 Governmental regulations such as the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the Family
and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA)
2000 – Present
 Pay for performance reward systems linking
performance to compensation prevalent
 The increase of cross-training and multi-tasking
which challenges organizations to customize
compensation approaches
 Continued popularity of equity plans
 A new look at stock plans
 Total rewards approach allows companies to better
compete for talent and resources by viewing the
employer/employee relationship holistically as a
strategic advantage

OAD-41564: The compensation timeline

  • 2.
    1900 – 1920’s Base pay based on piece rate; mainly cash compensation  Department of Labor established  Increased wage standardization resulted in the beginning of job evaluation and wage structures  Few companies offered pensions, profit sharing and guaranteed wages to workers  Very little government regulation and safety nets
  • 3.
    1920’s – 1930’s Pay for skill appeared  Cash compensation was primary form of employee reward  Government intervened with a range of social legislation and public works programs  Davis Bacon Act (1931) passed: required public construction project contractors be paid "prevailing wage"  Social Security Act of 1935 passed  National Labor Relations Act of 1935 passed (unions became stronger and more prevalent)  Fair Labor Standards Act (1938) passed
  • 4.
    1940’s – 1950’s •Wage system imbedded in regulated "internal labor markets" • Wage Stabilization Act; pay levels frozen to control inflation and boost war production • "Fringe benefits" were used to lessen the effects of the freeze • Individual incentive plans declined; pay increases became more predictable
  • 5.
    1960’s – 1970’s 1963 Equal Pay Act passed  Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed  Merit increase grids, seniority-based increases, cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) clauses, career progressions and ladders supporting detailed job analysis and job evaluation  A greater emphasis on the external market
  • 6.
    1980’s – 1990’s Greater emphasis on individual performance and results, group incentives and team-based pay  Compensation decisions aligned with the business strategy and reward valued employee behaviors  Use of broad banding pay grades increased  Teamwork and success sharing  Individualized variable pay based on performance  More strategic pay decisions  Intense competition for highly skilled workers
  • 7.
    1990’s – 2000 Great economic expansion  Intense competition for highly mobile skilled work force created stronger emphasis on attraction/retention of key employees  Increased use of broad-based equity programs, profit-sharing and pay for performance  Governmental regulations such as the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA)
  • 8.
    2000 – Present Pay for performance reward systems linking performance to compensation prevalent  The increase of cross-training and multi-tasking which challenges organizations to customize compensation approaches  Continued popularity of equity plans  A new look at stock plans  Total rewards approach allows companies to better compete for talent and resources by viewing the employer/employee relationship holistically as a strategic advantage