This document discusses the role of public intellectuals in addressing complex problems like climate change. It notes that public intellectuals can help create a common understanding of issues by defining causes, solutions, and implications in their writing. However, their influence also risks establishing views that are difficult to challenge. The document advocates for additional public intellectuals to question conventional wisdom and offer alternative perspectives in order to improve the public discourse.
Climate Advocacy in the Obama Years: Assessing Strategies for Societal ChangeMatthew Nisbet
On September 25 at Boston University, as part of a Howard Hughes Medical Institute-sponsored series organized by BU climate researcher David Marchant, I will be giving the following lecture, drawing on insights from two forthcoming papers. Below are details on the talk followed by references and links to the papers.
Climate Advocacy in the Obama Years:
Assessing Strategies for Societal Change
Matthew C. Nisbet
Northeastern University
Sept 25 5pm-6pm
Boston University
Life Sciences Building, B-01
24 Cummington Mall
This lecture evaluates the contrasting political strategies, communication approaches, and policy options pursued by U.S. advocacy groups, philanthropists, and their allies as they urge societal action to address climate change. Though these often competing networks of groups accept the undeniable, human causes of climate change, they each tend to emphasize a unique discourse about the problem, reflecting diverging views of society, nature, technology, policy, and politics. By reflecting on these differences and their implications, we can usefully think through the many ways that our own biases shape how we perceive the political conflict over climate change, who we blame, and what we prefer to be done. The goal is not to choose among competing perspectives, but to constructively grapple with their tensions and uncertainties. Through this process, we can hold our own convictions and opinions more lightly, identifying what is of value among the ideas offered by those on the left, right, and in the center.
Nisbet, M.C. (in press). Disruptive Ideas: Public Intellectuals and their Arguments for Action on Climate Change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change.
http://climateshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Nisbet_inpress_PublicIntellectualsClimateChange_WIREClimateChange.pdf
Nisbet, M.C. (in press). Environmental Advocacy in the Obama Years: Assessing New Strategies for Political Change. In N. Vig & M. Kraft (Eds), Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century, 9th Edition. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
http://climateshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Nisbet_inpress_EnvironmentalAdvocacyObamaYears_CQPress1.pdf
Key note address as part of the Canadian Nuclear Association's "Power for a Cooler Climate" conference held in Ottawa Feb 25-27.
https://cna.ca/2015-conference/program/
Sept 24 Talk @Tufts University: Public Intellectuals in the Climate Change De...Matthew Nisbet
Disruptive Ideas: Public Intellectuals and their Arguments for Action on Climate Change
September 24, 2015 12:00-1:00pm | Rabb Room, Lincoln Filene Center
Map: http://campusmaps.tufts.edu/medford/#fid=m015
Live Stream: Bit.ly/LiveLunchLearn
In this presentation, Dr. Nisbet will discuss his research analyzing the role that prominent public intellectuals like Bill McKibben, Naomi Klein, Jeffrey Sachs, Tom Friedman, and Andrew Revkin play in shaping debate over climate change. He will detail how public intellectuals establish their authority, spread their ideas, and shape political discourse, assessing the contrasting stories that they tell about the causes and solutions to climate change and related environmental problems.He will propose methods for building on his analysis and urge the need for forums that feature a diversity of voices, discourses, and ideas.
Matthew C. Nisbet is Associate Professor ofCommunication, Public Policy & Urban Affairs atNortheastern University. He is Editor-in-Chief of The Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication,“The Age of Us” columnist at The Conversation, a consulting researcher to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and a member of the National AcademiesRoundtable Committee on Public Interfaces in the LifeSciences. Nisbet studies the role of communication, media,and public opinion in debates over science, technology, and the environment. The author of more than 70 peer-reviewed studies, scholarly book chapters, and reports, he teaches courses in Environmental and Risk Communication, PoliticalCommunication, and Strategic Communication.
Among awards and recognition, he has been a Shorenstein Fellow on Media, Policy, and Politics atHarvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation HealthPolicy Investigator, and a Google Science Communication Fellow. The editors at the journalNature have recommended Nisbet’s research as “essential reading for anyone with a passing interest in the climate change debate,” and the New Republic has highlighted his work as a“fascinating dissection of the shortcomings of climate activism.” Nisbet holds a Ph.D. and M.S. inCommunication from Cornell University and a BA in Government from Dartmouth College.
More information: http://as.tufts.edu/environmentalStudies/documents/lunchLearnFall2015.pdf#page=4
Systems, change and growth - Huff and BrockSTEPS Centre
Presentation from week 1 of the System Change HIVE that outlines big ideas about the environment and some criticisms of capitalism.
http://systemchangehive.org/
Rosemary Kalapurakal: Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable...Daniel Strain
On 31 May, Rosemary Kalapurakal, Kumi Naidoo and Per Olsson hosted a discussion about the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and transformation. The discussion focused on the implications of transformation research for the implementation of the SDGs, particular SDG-17 – "Partnerships for the Goals" – the only goal that explicitly addresses how nations will meet these sustainability targets.
Eeva Furman: Transformation and SDGs: The Measurement ChallengeFuture Earth
On 27 June, Eeva Furman, Michael Quinn Patton and Fred Carden led a webinar exploring "Transformation and the SDGs: The Measurement Challenge." The discussion revolved around the relationship between traditional measures, such as national indices, log frames, results frameworks and efficiency concepts, with the complex quality of transformation.
Kumi Naidoo: SDGs and Transformation in a Context of Institutional FailureFuture Earth
On 31 May, Rosemary Kalapurakal, Kumi Naidoo and Per Olsson hosted a discussion about the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and transformation. The discussion focused on the implications of transformation research for the implementation of the SDGs, particular SDG-17 – "Partnerships for the Goals" – the only goal that explicitly addresses how nations will meet these sustainability targets.
Climate Advocacy in the Obama Years: Assessing Strategies for Societal ChangeMatthew Nisbet
On September 25 at Boston University, as part of a Howard Hughes Medical Institute-sponsored series organized by BU climate researcher David Marchant, I will be giving the following lecture, drawing on insights from two forthcoming papers. Below are details on the talk followed by references and links to the papers.
Climate Advocacy in the Obama Years:
Assessing Strategies for Societal Change
Matthew C. Nisbet
Northeastern University
Sept 25 5pm-6pm
Boston University
Life Sciences Building, B-01
24 Cummington Mall
This lecture evaluates the contrasting political strategies, communication approaches, and policy options pursued by U.S. advocacy groups, philanthropists, and their allies as they urge societal action to address climate change. Though these often competing networks of groups accept the undeniable, human causes of climate change, they each tend to emphasize a unique discourse about the problem, reflecting diverging views of society, nature, technology, policy, and politics. By reflecting on these differences and their implications, we can usefully think through the many ways that our own biases shape how we perceive the political conflict over climate change, who we blame, and what we prefer to be done. The goal is not to choose among competing perspectives, but to constructively grapple with their tensions and uncertainties. Through this process, we can hold our own convictions and opinions more lightly, identifying what is of value among the ideas offered by those on the left, right, and in the center.
Nisbet, M.C. (in press). Disruptive Ideas: Public Intellectuals and their Arguments for Action on Climate Change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change.
http://climateshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Nisbet_inpress_PublicIntellectualsClimateChange_WIREClimateChange.pdf
Nisbet, M.C. (in press). Environmental Advocacy in the Obama Years: Assessing New Strategies for Political Change. In N. Vig & M. Kraft (Eds), Environmental Policy: New Directions for the Twenty-First Century, 9th Edition. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
http://climateshiftproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Nisbet_inpress_EnvironmentalAdvocacyObamaYears_CQPress1.pdf
Key note address as part of the Canadian Nuclear Association's "Power for a Cooler Climate" conference held in Ottawa Feb 25-27.
https://cna.ca/2015-conference/program/
Sept 24 Talk @Tufts University: Public Intellectuals in the Climate Change De...Matthew Nisbet
Disruptive Ideas: Public Intellectuals and their Arguments for Action on Climate Change
September 24, 2015 12:00-1:00pm | Rabb Room, Lincoln Filene Center
Map: http://campusmaps.tufts.edu/medford/#fid=m015
Live Stream: Bit.ly/LiveLunchLearn
In this presentation, Dr. Nisbet will discuss his research analyzing the role that prominent public intellectuals like Bill McKibben, Naomi Klein, Jeffrey Sachs, Tom Friedman, and Andrew Revkin play in shaping debate over climate change. He will detail how public intellectuals establish their authority, spread their ideas, and shape political discourse, assessing the contrasting stories that they tell about the causes and solutions to climate change and related environmental problems.He will propose methods for building on his analysis and urge the need for forums that feature a diversity of voices, discourses, and ideas.
Matthew C. Nisbet is Associate Professor ofCommunication, Public Policy & Urban Affairs atNortheastern University. He is Editor-in-Chief of The Oxford Encyclopedia of Climate Change Communication,“The Age of Us” columnist at The Conversation, a consulting researcher to the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and a member of the National AcademiesRoundtable Committee on Public Interfaces in the LifeSciences. Nisbet studies the role of communication, media,and public opinion in debates over science, technology, and the environment. The author of more than 70 peer-reviewed studies, scholarly book chapters, and reports, he teaches courses in Environmental and Risk Communication, PoliticalCommunication, and Strategic Communication.
Among awards and recognition, he has been a Shorenstein Fellow on Media, Policy, and Politics atHarvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation HealthPolicy Investigator, and a Google Science Communication Fellow. The editors at the journalNature have recommended Nisbet’s research as “essential reading for anyone with a passing interest in the climate change debate,” and the New Republic has highlighted his work as a“fascinating dissection of the shortcomings of climate activism.” Nisbet holds a Ph.D. and M.S. inCommunication from Cornell University and a BA in Government from Dartmouth College.
More information: http://as.tufts.edu/environmentalStudies/documents/lunchLearnFall2015.pdf#page=4
Systems, change and growth - Huff and BrockSTEPS Centre
Presentation from week 1 of the System Change HIVE that outlines big ideas about the environment and some criticisms of capitalism.
http://systemchangehive.org/
Rosemary Kalapurakal: Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable...Daniel Strain
On 31 May, Rosemary Kalapurakal, Kumi Naidoo and Per Olsson hosted a discussion about the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and transformation. The discussion focused on the implications of transformation research for the implementation of the SDGs, particular SDG-17 – "Partnerships for the Goals" – the only goal that explicitly addresses how nations will meet these sustainability targets.
Eeva Furman: Transformation and SDGs: The Measurement ChallengeFuture Earth
On 27 June, Eeva Furman, Michael Quinn Patton and Fred Carden led a webinar exploring "Transformation and the SDGs: The Measurement Challenge." The discussion revolved around the relationship between traditional measures, such as national indices, log frames, results frameworks and efficiency concepts, with the complex quality of transformation.
Kumi Naidoo: SDGs and Transformation in a Context of Institutional FailureFuture Earth
On 31 May, Rosemary Kalapurakal, Kumi Naidoo and Per Olsson hosted a discussion about the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and transformation. The discussion focused on the implications of transformation research for the implementation of the SDGs, particular SDG-17 – "Partnerships for the Goals" – the only goal that explicitly addresses how nations will meet these sustainability targets.
“Sustainable Development” (SD) is an expression frequently used by ecologists,
media and politicians, but it does not always carry the same concise meaning. The EEA
(1998) stated in 1998 that over 300 definitions of SD had been given, many of them inappropriate, as the outcome of different visions, values scales, interests and
ideologies. In this way, SD becomes a non-operative ‘chewing gum concept’ that
everybody can adapt in his own convenience (Bermejo, 2005, p.24)
The Brundtland Report (1987) states the most widely accepted definition of SD as
“the development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generations to meet their own needs”. The worldwide commitment on the
acceptance of this definition constitutes a milestone in itself.
6th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2016 Integrative Risk Management - Towards Resilient Cities. 28 August - 01 September 2016 in Davos, Switzerland
The Social Challenge of 1.5°C Webinar: Frank Biermanntewksjj
Karen O'Brien, Susanne Moser, Ioan Fazey and others from Future Earth's Transformations Knowledge-Action Network discuss mobilising research around the social challenge of a 1.5°C target for climate action.
Lectures: Scientists & Advocacy / Models of Science CommunicationMatthew Nisbet
Slides from class lectures and discussion in the American University course COM 589: "Communication, Culture and the Environment," Spring 2014.
http://climateshiftproject.org/com-589-communication-culture-and-the-environment-spring-2014/
Climate Resilience and Innovation in a Polarized Society: Strategies to Infor...Matthew Nisbet
In this final lecture for the course that I teach at American University on "Communication, Culture and the Environment," my goal is to leave the students with a sense of hope by focusing on research and strategies that promote the ability of local publics to collaborate together on actions that prepare and protect their communities and regions against the risks of climate change and in the process promote networks of trust and cooperation that create the demand for national policy action that results in the types of innovative technologies needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions over the long term. You can find out more about the course here:
http://climateshiftproject.org/com-589-communication-culture-and-the-environment-spring-2014/
Disruptive Ideas: Public Intellectuals and their Arguments for Action on Clim...Matthew Nisbet
March 27, 2014 presentation sponsored by the Science and Technology Studies Program, Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, and the School of Journalism at the University of British Columbia.
In this presentation, I review three distinct groups of prominent public intellectuals arguing for action on climate change. I discuss how these individuals establish and maintain their authority, how their ideas and arguments spread and diffuse by way of the media, and how they shape the assumptions of global networks of activists, philanthropists, journalists, and academics. Then, for each group, drawing on their main works, I describe how they define the social implications of climate change and the barriers to addressing the problem, their vision of a future society and their favored policy actions, their outlook on nature and technology, and their views on politics and social change. In the conclusion, I discuss the need for investment in media and public forums that strengthen our civic capacity to learn, debate, and collaborate in ways that take advantage of different discourses, ideas and voices.
“Sustainable Development” (SD) is an expression frequently used by ecologists,
media and politicians, but it does not always carry the same concise meaning. The EEA
(1998) stated in 1998 that over 300 definitions of SD had been given, many of them inappropriate, as the outcome of different visions, values scales, interests and
ideologies. In this way, SD becomes a non-operative ‘chewing gum concept’ that
everybody can adapt in his own convenience (Bermejo, 2005, p.24)
The Brundtland Report (1987) states the most widely accepted definition of SD as
“the development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability
of future generations to meet their own needs”. The worldwide commitment on the
acceptance of this definition constitutes a milestone in itself.
6th International Disaster and Risk Conference IDRC 2016 Integrative Risk Management - Towards Resilient Cities. 28 August - 01 September 2016 in Davos, Switzerland
The Social Challenge of 1.5°C Webinar: Frank Biermanntewksjj
Karen O'Brien, Susanne Moser, Ioan Fazey and others from Future Earth's Transformations Knowledge-Action Network discuss mobilising research around the social challenge of a 1.5°C target for climate action.
Lectures: Scientists & Advocacy / Models of Science CommunicationMatthew Nisbet
Slides from class lectures and discussion in the American University course COM 589: "Communication, Culture and the Environment," Spring 2014.
http://climateshiftproject.org/com-589-communication-culture-and-the-environment-spring-2014/
Climate Resilience and Innovation in a Polarized Society: Strategies to Infor...Matthew Nisbet
In this final lecture for the course that I teach at American University on "Communication, Culture and the Environment," my goal is to leave the students with a sense of hope by focusing on research and strategies that promote the ability of local publics to collaborate together on actions that prepare and protect their communities and regions against the risks of climate change and in the process promote networks of trust and cooperation that create the demand for national policy action that results in the types of innovative technologies needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions over the long term. You can find out more about the course here:
http://climateshiftproject.org/com-589-communication-culture-and-the-environment-spring-2014/
Disruptive Ideas: Public Intellectuals and their Arguments for Action on Clim...Matthew Nisbet
March 27, 2014 presentation sponsored by the Science and Technology Studies Program, Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, and the School of Journalism at the University of British Columbia.
In this presentation, I review three distinct groups of prominent public intellectuals arguing for action on climate change. I discuss how these individuals establish and maintain their authority, how their ideas and arguments spread and diffuse by way of the media, and how they shape the assumptions of global networks of activists, philanthropists, journalists, and academics. Then, for each group, drawing on their main works, I describe how they define the social implications of climate change and the barriers to addressing the problem, their vision of a future society and their favored policy actions, their outlook on nature and technology, and their views on politics and social change. In the conclusion, I discuss the need for investment in media and public forums that strengthen our civic capacity to learn, debate, and collaborate in ways that take advantage of different discourses, ideas and voices.
Preparing for Abrupt Climate Change: Building Civic Capacity and Overcoming P...Matthew Nisbet
Over the past year, I have had the great opportunity to work with faculty and students at the The University of Maine’s Climate Change Institute and their NSF-funded Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship (IGERT) – the first of its kind to focus explicitly on adaptation to abrupt climate change. Here is a short description on the rationale for the program, a joint initiative between the Climate Change Institute and the School of Policy and International Affairs at the University of Maine.
The paradigm that climate change operates slowly and gradually shifted with the discovery of abrupt climate change (ACC), which refers to rapid state changes in the climate system that are either transient or persistent, and of variable magnitude. We now recognize that abrupt climate change is one of the greatest threats to the sustainability of human society and ecosystem services, yet economic and social systems are rarely designed for abrupt nonlinear environmental change. The Adaptation to Abrupt Climate Change (A2C2) IGERT is a doctoral training program for students in earth sciences, ecology, anthropology, archaeology, international affairs, and economics. A2C2 is designed to train the next generation of natural and social scientists to meet the critical societal challenge of human adaptation to abrupt climate change (ACC).
In the Spring of 2013, I taught a week-long workshop for students involved in the IGERT program and other faculty and professionals at the University of Maine. Participants were introduced to research and strategies for more effectively engaging the public and policymakers on sustainability-related issues. The workshop also covered different schools of thought, modes of practice, and areas of research relevant to navigating the intersections among science, policy, and communication. The goal was for participants to gain an integrated understanding of the institutions, organizations, and actors involved in public communication and policymaker engagement; and the different roles they can play as experts, professionals and educators.
In Fall 2013, I participated in a retreat for faculty, organizational partners and students involved in the A2C2 program. To generate discussion and small group idea generation, I presented a brief overview on communication challenges and strategies relevant to preparing for abrupt climate change. In my presentation, I focused particularly on sea level rise and other coastal impacts. I also created a web page and list of relevant readings and resources that I will continue to update. You can find the list at the link below.
http://climateshiftproject.org/preparing-and-planning-ahead-for-abrupt-climate-change/
New Climate Media is the first media company that frames climate change as humanity’s chance to realize its full potential.
We create and distribute media that encourages concerned citizens to take personal responsibility for climate change, and to recognize their own unique role in the co-creation of a sustainable future.
HOW TO TALK EFFECTIVELY ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGEHaulTail
Lately, climate change has imposed itself on the public sphere. Through extreme events linked to changes in the climate, new scientific reports and studies, and rejuvenated youth movements (along with many other political, economic, scientific, ecological, meteorological and cultural events and issues) climate change has been increasingly difficult to ignore.
But you wouldn't really have picked up on that in the first round of the U.S. Democratic party primary debates that took place in Miami, Florida. As 20 candidates made their case to the American people, it was striking how minimally and shallowly they discussed climate change.
How Integration of Systems Will Bring Concrete Benefits to the Earth and to M...Stephen Lee
Presentation made to the Hong Kong Bio- and Eco-Energy Industry Assocation, Dec 14, 2011. The world is at an uncertain divide, with the East on the rise and the West on the decline. Excesses of capitalism, and escalating costs of social benefits brought imbalances to the world, potentially pitching the young generation against the old. Will the vision of a green planet be shattered because it is unaffordable and too much of an economic burden on mankind? It is more imperative than ever that efforts to clean up the planet be based on the idea of integrating, automating and optimizing past systems which were operated in isolation from one another. New and concrete benefits will be turned up by innovative ways to explore synergistic relationships among proximate systems and to optimize their joint operation. An example can be found in bringing together systems of waste treatment, electricity production, and steam or heat production. However, real benefits must exceed real costs before the world will remain committed to the path of a green planet.
Essay On Conservation Of Environment. Article on conservation of environment...afjzdtooeofvaa
Sample essay on hindrances to environmental conservation. Short Essay About Environmental Conservation Pollution .... Conservation Of Environment Essay Telegraph. Easy Steps How To Write An Environment Conservation Essay MyCoursebay. Essay one step conservation environment - myteacherpages.x.fc2.com. Article on conservation of environment. Methods and Importance of .... Conservation essay finale. Short essay on conservation of environment. Environmental .... PPT - Save environment essay PowerPoint Presentation, free download .... Essay on Conservation of Environment Environment Conservation Essay .... Write an essay on Conservation of Nature Essay Writing English .... Environment Essay. Environmental Issues Essay : Essays on Environmental Issues. Essay on Save Environment 3 Samples - Leverage Edu. Essay - Ways to conserve the environment. Importance of Environment Essay Essay on Importance of Environment .... Environment Essay Guided Discovery Environmentalism Natural Environment. Conservation of environment essay pdf. Essay on Conservation of .... Students make posters on World Nature Conservation Day. Essay On Conservation Of Environment International Writings Save .... Essay on Conservation of Natural Resources Conversation of Natural .... Narrative Essay: Essay on conservation of environment. Argumentative Essay: Environment protection essay. Essay on Environment Conservation Cheap Essay Writing Help .... We and our environment essay. Essay on Environment for Students and Children PDF Download. 5 Major Importance of Environmental Conservation Earth Reminder. Descriptive essay: Essay on conservation of environment. How to protect the nature essay. Short Essay on the Conservation of .... Admission essay: Environmental conservation essay. Essay on Environment Environment Essay for Students and Children in ... Essay On Conservation Of Environment Essay On Conservation Of Environment. Article on conservation of environment. Methods and Importance of ...
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativePeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
2024.06.01 Introducing a competency framework for languag learning materials ...Sandy Millin
http://sandymillin.wordpress.com/iateflwebinar2024
Published classroom materials form the basis of syllabuses, drive teacher professional development, and have a potentially huge influence on learners, teachers and education systems. All teachers also create their own materials, whether a few sentences on a blackboard, a highly-structured fully-realised online course, or anything in between. Despite this, the knowledge and skills needed to create effective language learning materials are rarely part of teacher training, and are mostly learnt by trial and error.
Knowledge and skills frameworks, generally called competency frameworks, for ELT teachers, trainers and managers have existed for a few years now. However, until I created one for my MA dissertation, there wasn’t one drawing together what we need to know and do to be able to effectively produce language learning materials.
This webinar will introduce you to my framework, highlighting the key competencies I identified from my research. It will also show how anybody involved in language teaching (any language, not just English!), teacher training, managing schools or developing language learning materials can benefit from using the framework.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
2. The Design to Win Report (2007)
@MCNisbet
o “A cap on carbon output—and an accompanying
market for emissions permits—will prompt a sea
change that washes over the entire global economy.”
o “The good news is that we already have the technology
and know-how to achieve these carbon reductions—
often at a cost savings.”
o “Climate change, unlike a lot of large-scale problems, is
actually one that is solvable. It is also one where we
know what we need to do. We have the best data in the
world on how to prevent climate change. Everything
was ranked by magnitude, location and sector. It’s a
systematic approach to problem solving.” – Hal Harvey,
NY Times profile
3.
4. This Changes Everything?
Capitalism vs. the Climate
@MCNisbet
“Our economic model is at war with life on
Earth. We can’t change the laws of nature,
but we can change our growth economy.
And that’s why climate change is not just a
disaster, it’s also our best chance to
demand and build a better world.”
6. Telling Stories about Wicked Problems
@MCNisbet
o The more complex a problem like climate
change, the more equally plausible
discourses and narratives exist about
what should be done.
o Climate change serves as an opportunity
for different groups to mobilize on behalf
of their values, goals and vision for
society.
o Climate change is “a synecdoche – a
figurative turn of phrase in which
something stands in for something
else—for something much more important
than simply the way humans are changing
the weather,” – Mike Hulme
7. Who Is a Public Intellectual?
@MCNisbetNisbet 2014
o 1) Write for and engage a broader public on matters of
popular concern, rather than narrowly targeting an expert
audience and emphasizing the more technical details of a
debate.
o 2) Specialize in the synthesis of complex, interdisciplinary
areas of research, engaging in deductive analysis across
cases and events, “working from the top down,” drawing
connections, making inferences, and offering judgments.
o 3) Argue on behalf of causes and policies, serving in the
role of social critic, advocate, or activist.
8. Public Intellectuals and Wicked Problems:
Creating a Common Language and Outlook
@MCNisbet
o Promote a common storyline about climate change, defining who or
what is to blame, what should be done, and what action would mean for
the future.
o Discourses informally guide the decisions of advocates, funders,
journalists, and governmental officials.
o Define which experts or views might be mainstream versus what
might be contrarian or out of bounds.
o Once assumptions and authorities established, “costly in terms of
human mental labor to re-examine what has finally come to be
taken for granted.”
o Other public intellectuals are needed to “disturb the canonical peace”
and “defamiliarize the obvious” by identifying the flaws in
conventional wisdom and by offering alternative renderings of a
problem.