Intensify and Evolve. Together.
BioContinuum™
Platform
Adoption of
Next Generation
Bioprocessing for mAbs
Current & Future Adoption Context of AdoptionDrivers & Hurdles
Next Generation Processing:
Evolutionary Journey Across Many Disciplines
Facility Goals
90%
90%
70%
90%
less
footprint
less
capital
reduction in
construction time
reduction
in OPEX
Barriers
• System complexity
• Expertise
• Availability of alternate suppliers
• Regulatory guidance
• Scale-up risk
• Tech-transfer risk
• Future difficulty finding CMO in
order to expand process
Customer Needs
Control
Costs
Augment Facility
Flexibility
Enhance Capacity
Utilization
3 Barriers to Fully Continuous Processing
1
On-Line Analytics
2
Batch Definition
3
Company Culture
Important Drivers for Adoption of Intensified Processing
Current & Future Adoption
Evolution to Intensified mAb Processing
is Already Happening Today
2018 | Standard mAb Process Template
2018 - 2020+ | mAb Process Intensification
>2025 | Continuous Processing
????????
Intensified Capture Flow-Through Polishing
In-Line
Viral Inactivation
ACID BASE ACID BASE
Perfusion
Elements of Process Intensification Most Likely to be
Adopted in the Next 5-10 Years
Intensified
Upstream
Technologies
12 3Downstream
Continuous
Capture
Buffer
Management
Intensified
Fed-batch
USP DSP
USP DSP
60%
Cell-line
and Media
Optimization
53%
Perfusion
40%
New Capture
Methodologies
43%
New Approaches
to Buffer
Management
50%
60%
Continuous
Capture
(Prot A / IEX)
#respondents selecting each area; n=30 interviews
Context of Adoption
Process Intensification Efforts Already Adopted at Some Level
in Most Respondents’ Organizations
Flow-through
Chromatography
27
Cell-line and
Media Optimization
27
Flow-through
Polishing/Purification IEX
22
New Approaches to
Buffer Management
16
Membrane
Chromatography
16
Main Reasons for Adopting Process Intensification
Techniques So Far
Who Adopts Process Intensification Where and Why?
• Maximize capacity within existing facilities before
investing in new facilities
• Allow for new facilities to be built with smaller,
more economically efficient processes
Economics - Reduce COGS
Capacity Utilization
Size/Facility Footprint
Intensification is
seen as a lever to:
17
12
4
In 10 Years...
28% of commercial molecules
will utilize intensified DSP
of molecules in commercial
manufacturing will utilize
intensified USP 35%
Large and medium sized
biotech/pharma
Small biotech/pharma
CMOs
Biosimilar manufacturers
Lifecycle products may also adopt
elements of intensification to optimize
current processes
They have the money to invest and
process expertise required, particularly
those with capacity constraints
Hybrid
Mostly single use
Mostly stainless steel
Intensified technologies mostly single use
at the clinical-scale and mostly hybrid at
the commercial scale
New facilities
Both
Existing facilities
Intensified processes incorporated in new
facility design
Existing facilities to implement single-use
intensification for process optimization to
overcome capacity constraints
New molecules in development
Second generation processes
for commercial molecules
Biosimilars
* Source: BioPhorum (BPOG)
https://www.biophorum.com/category/resources/technology-roadmapping-resources/introduction/ The BioContinuum™ Platform represents our belief in and commitment to the evolution
of bioprocessing. Together with our customers and regulators, we strive to accelerate
access to biopharmaceuticals for patients worldwide.
Whether developing an intensified, connected or continuous bioprocess, the
BioContinuum™ Platform provides the building blocks to help you achieve your
bioprocessing goals. This holistic and forward-looking view of biomanufacturing actively
incorporates connected software, controls and analytics across our portfolio of
technologies to make the factory of the future a reality.
The BioContinuum™ Platform is an expanding offering of proven and novel technologies,
applications and expertise enabling biotherapeutic manufacturers to confidently enter
the era of next generation processing by delivering increased speed, greater flexibility
and enhanced quality while reducing the costs and risks of navigating the evolving
biopharma landscape.
30 US and European biomanufacturers were interviewed
to understand the likely future adoption of ‘Next Generation
Bioprocessing’ for mAbs over the next 5-10 years
the survey focused on
primary research and qualitative results
CDMO
Mid-large Pharma / Biotech
Small Pharma / Biotech
Biosimilar Manufacturers
73 60
40
57
43
27
40
33
10
10
7
US
EU
VP / Head
(Sr.) Director
Technology / Innovation
Process Development
Manufacturing
Organization Type % Respondent Role %
Survey Respondent Demographics
Survey Scope
Drivers & Hurdles
Market Growth New Product
Classes
Cost PressureUncertainty
Speed Flexibility CostQuality
• High demand
• Number of drugs supplied
• Global reach
• Emerging markets
• Clinical efficacy
• Approvals: Complex
regulation
• Demand: Market share
• Regional requirements
• New modalities
• Personalized medicine
• Payer pressure on price
• Biosimilars and competition
• Cost of clinical failure
• Escalating development
costs
Market Trends, Business Drivers and Key Enabling Technologies*
Market Trends
Business Drivers
Key Enabling Technologies
70% 10x 90% 90%reduction in new facility
build times
robustness reduction in product
change over time
reduction in cost to
manufacture and
capital expenditure
Compress production
lead time by 80%
90% reduction in cost
of poor quality
Process
Intensification
Single Use
Process
Analytics
Software &
Automation
BioPhorum Operations Group (BPOG) Technology Roadmap
FACTORY
OF THE
FUTURE
Batch
Continuous
Process
Intensified
Connected
SU/Closed
Format
Stainless
Hybrid
Single Use
In-Line/
Real-Time
Sensing
Analytics
Standard
QC Methods
Rapid QC
Methods
At-line
Predictive
Process
Control
Controls
Stand-Alone
Control
Semi-Centralized
Control
Full Process
Control
Adaptive
Plant
Digital Plant
Pre-Digital
Plant
Digital Silos
Connected
Plant
Today
Near-term
Mid-term
End state
Intensify and Evolve. Together.
BioContinuum™
Platform
Cost control
(CapEx - OpEx
- Labor - Other)
90%
System
complexity/
difficulty
77%
Expertise
with process
development
and tech
transfer
60%
Reliable, robust
supply/availability
of alternate
suppliers
57%
Greater facility
flexibility
93%
Accommodate
multiple
molecules in
the pipeline
74%
Multi-use
product
facilities
67%
© 2018 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Merck, the vibrant M
and BioContinuum are trademarks of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks
are the property of their respective owners. Detailed information on trademarks is available via publicly
accessible resources. Lit Code: MK_BR2733EN Ver. 1.0 09/2018
The life science business of Merck operates as
MilliporeSigma in the U.S. and Canada.

Next Generation Bioprocessing adoption for mAbs – BioContinuum™ Platform Infographic

  • 1.
    Intensify and Evolve.Together. BioContinuum™ Platform Adoption of Next Generation Bioprocessing for mAbs Current & Future Adoption Context of AdoptionDrivers & Hurdles Next Generation Processing: Evolutionary Journey Across Many Disciplines Facility Goals 90% 90% 70% 90% less footprint less capital reduction in construction time reduction in OPEX Barriers • System complexity • Expertise • Availability of alternate suppliers • Regulatory guidance • Scale-up risk • Tech-transfer risk • Future difficulty finding CMO in order to expand process Customer Needs Control Costs Augment Facility Flexibility Enhance Capacity Utilization 3 Barriers to Fully Continuous Processing 1 On-Line Analytics 2 Batch Definition 3 Company Culture Important Drivers for Adoption of Intensified Processing Current & Future Adoption Evolution to Intensified mAb Processing is Already Happening Today 2018 | Standard mAb Process Template 2018 - 2020+ | mAb Process Intensification >2025 | Continuous Processing ???????? Intensified Capture Flow-Through Polishing In-Line Viral Inactivation ACID BASE ACID BASE Perfusion Elements of Process Intensification Most Likely to be Adopted in the Next 5-10 Years Intensified Upstream Technologies 12 3Downstream Continuous Capture Buffer Management Intensified Fed-batch USP DSP USP DSP 60% Cell-line and Media Optimization 53% Perfusion 40% New Capture Methodologies 43% New Approaches to Buffer Management 50% 60% Continuous Capture (Prot A / IEX) #respondents selecting each area; n=30 interviews Context of Adoption Process Intensification Efforts Already Adopted at Some Level in Most Respondents’ Organizations Flow-through Chromatography 27 Cell-line and Media Optimization 27 Flow-through Polishing/Purification IEX 22 New Approaches to Buffer Management 16 Membrane Chromatography 16 Main Reasons for Adopting Process Intensification Techniques So Far Who Adopts Process Intensification Where and Why? • Maximize capacity within existing facilities before investing in new facilities • Allow for new facilities to be built with smaller, more economically efficient processes Economics - Reduce COGS Capacity Utilization Size/Facility Footprint Intensification is seen as a lever to: 17 12 4 In 10 Years... 28% of commercial molecules will utilize intensified DSP of molecules in commercial manufacturing will utilize intensified USP 35% Large and medium sized biotech/pharma Small biotech/pharma CMOs Biosimilar manufacturers Lifecycle products may also adopt elements of intensification to optimize current processes They have the money to invest and process expertise required, particularly those with capacity constraints Hybrid Mostly single use Mostly stainless steel Intensified technologies mostly single use at the clinical-scale and mostly hybrid at the commercial scale New facilities Both Existing facilities Intensified processes incorporated in new facility design Existing facilities to implement single-use intensification for process optimization to overcome capacity constraints New molecules in development Second generation processes for commercial molecules Biosimilars * Source: BioPhorum (BPOG) https://www.biophorum.com/category/resources/technology-roadmapping-resources/introduction/ The BioContinuum™ Platform represents our belief in and commitment to the evolution of bioprocessing. Together with our customers and regulators, we strive to accelerate access to biopharmaceuticals for patients worldwide. Whether developing an intensified, connected or continuous bioprocess, the BioContinuum™ Platform provides the building blocks to help you achieve your bioprocessing goals. This holistic and forward-looking view of biomanufacturing actively incorporates connected software, controls and analytics across our portfolio of technologies to make the factory of the future a reality. The BioContinuum™ Platform is an expanding offering of proven and novel technologies, applications and expertise enabling biotherapeutic manufacturers to confidently enter the era of next generation processing by delivering increased speed, greater flexibility and enhanced quality while reducing the costs and risks of navigating the evolving biopharma landscape. 30 US and European biomanufacturers were interviewed to understand the likely future adoption of ‘Next Generation Bioprocessing’ for mAbs over the next 5-10 years the survey focused on primary research and qualitative results CDMO Mid-large Pharma / Biotech Small Pharma / Biotech Biosimilar Manufacturers 73 60 40 57 43 27 40 33 10 10 7 US EU VP / Head (Sr.) Director Technology / Innovation Process Development Manufacturing Organization Type % Respondent Role % Survey Respondent Demographics Survey Scope Drivers & Hurdles Market Growth New Product Classes Cost PressureUncertainty Speed Flexibility CostQuality • High demand • Number of drugs supplied • Global reach • Emerging markets • Clinical efficacy • Approvals: Complex regulation • Demand: Market share • Regional requirements • New modalities • Personalized medicine • Payer pressure on price • Biosimilars and competition • Cost of clinical failure • Escalating development costs Market Trends, Business Drivers and Key Enabling Technologies* Market Trends Business Drivers Key Enabling Technologies 70% 10x 90% 90%reduction in new facility build times robustness reduction in product change over time reduction in cost to manufacture and capital expenditure Compress production lead time by 80% 90% reduction in cost of poor quality Process Intensification Single Use Process Analytics Software & Automation BioPhorum Operations Group (BPOG) Technology Roadmap FACTORY OF THE FUTURE Batch Continuous Process Intensified Connected SU/Closed Format Stainless Hybrid Single Use In-Line/ Real-Time Sensing Analytics Standard QC Methods Rapid QC Methods At-line Predictive Process Control Controls Stand-Alone Control Semi-Centralized Control Full Process Control Adaptive Plant Digital Plant Pre-Digital Plant Digital Silos Connected Plant Today Near-term Mid-term End state Intensify and Evolve. Together. BioContinuum™ Platform Cost control (CapEx - OpEx - Labor - Other) 90% System complexity/ difficulty 77% Expertise with process development and tech transfer 60% Reliable, robust supply/availability of alternate suppliers 57% Greater facility flexibility 93% Accommodate multiple molecules in the pipeline 74% Multi-use product facilities 67% © 2018 Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and/or its affiliates. All Rights Reserved. Merck, the vibrant M and BioContinuum are trademarks of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany or its affiliates. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Detailed information on trademarks is available via publicly accessible resources. Lit Code: MK_BR2733EN Ver. 1.0 09/2018 The life science business of Merck operates as MilliporeSigma in the U.S. and Canada.