SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 17
Download to read offline
FOR RELEASE SEPTEMBER 6, 2017
BY Elisa Shearer and Jeffrey Gottfried
FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES:
Amy Mitchell, Director, Journalism Research
Hannah Klein, Communications Associate
202.419.4372
www.pewresearch.org
RECOMMENDED CITATION
Pew Research Center, September, 2017, “News
Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017”
1
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
About Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes
and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts
public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social
science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and
technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social
and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew
Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder.
© Pew Research Center 2017
2
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
45%
55
78% 78
2016 2017
50+
Ages
18-49
60
6968
63
2016 2017
Some college
or less
College+
64
74
62
64
2016 2017
Nonwhite
White
2018%
27
26%
20
18%
20172016
62%
67
Often
Sometimes
Hardly ever
News Use Across Social Media
Platforms 2017
As of August 2017, two-thirds (67%) of Americans report that
they get at least some of their news on social media – with two-
in-ten doing so often, according to a new survey from Pew
Research Center. This is a modest increase since early 2016,
when (during the height of the presidential primaries) 62% of
U.S. adults reported getting news from social media. While a
small increase overall, this growth is driven by more substantial
increases among Americans who are older, less educated, and
nonwhite. This study is based on a survey conducted August 8-
21, 2017, with 4,971 U.S. adults who are members of Pew
Research Center’s nationally representative American Trends
Panel.
For the first time in the Center’s surveys, more than half (55%)
of Americans ages 50 or older report getting news on social
media sites. That is 10 percentage points higher than the 45%
who said so in 2016. Those under 50, meanwhile, remain more
likely than their elders to get news from these sites (78% do,
Social media news use increases among older, nonwhite and less educated
Americans
% of U.S. adults who get news from social media sites …
Note: Nonwhite includes all race and ethnic groups other than non-Hispanic whites.
Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017.
“News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
In 2017, two-thirds of
U.S. adults get news from
social media
% of U.S. adults who get news from
social media sites …
Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017.
“News Use Across Social Media Platforms
2017”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
3
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
unchanged from 2016).
Furthermore, about three-quarters of nonwhites (74%) get news on social media sites, up from
64% in 2016. This growth means that nonwhites1 are now more likely than whites to get news
while on social media. And social media news use also increased among those with less than a
bachelor’s degree, up nine percentage points from 60% in 2016 to 69% in 2017. Alternatively,
among those with at least a college degree, social media news use declined slightly.
1 Nonwhite includes all racial and ethnic groups, except non-Hispanic white.
74%
32
29
59%
21
17
52%
20
Twitter
YouTube
'16-'17
CHANGE
+15*
+11*
+12*
2017
2016
2013
Snapchat
Sites where news usership
increased since 2016
68
68
39
27
23
23
70
66
31
23
19
62
47
29
13
13
Reddit
Facebook
Tumblr
Instagram
LinkedIn
-2
+2
+8
+4
+4
WhatsApp N/A
Sites where news usership
did not change since 2016
Twitter, YouTube and Snapchat have grown
in share of users who get news on each
site
Because of the vastly different audience sizes
across major social media sites, there are two
different ways to think about measuring
change in news use on these platforms. One is
to compare the share of each site’s users that
get news on the site, while the second is to
measure the total percentage of Americans
that report seeing news on the site.
We first look at the share of each site’s users
who get news there. Overall, three of the sites
measured — Twitter, YouTube and Snapchat
— had an increase in the share of their
audience that gets news on the site. Since
2013, at least half of Twitter users have
reported getting news on the site, but in 2017,
with a president who frequently makes
announcements on the platform, that share
has increased to about three-quarters (74%),
up 15 percentage points from last year. On
YouTube, about a third of users now get news
there (32%), up from 21% in 2016. And news
use among Snapchat’s user base increased 12
percentage points to 29% in August 2017, up
from 17% in early 2016.
Growth on these three sites follows
investments the companies have made over
the last year in developing their news usability.
Twitter, in addition to getting nearly daily
attention from the president’s posts, spent the
year promoting the platform’s potential for
news publishers and has announced launches
for multiple news streaming partnerships. YouTube launched and expanded YouTube TV, and the
Twitter, YouTube and Snapchat have
grown since 2016 in portion of users
who get news on each site
% of each social media site’s users who get news there
*Change from 2016 to 2017 is statistically significant.
Note: Snapchat not asked about in 2013. WhatsApp not asked
about in 2013 or 2016.
Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017.
“News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
5
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
site added a “breaking news” summary on its homepage. It also continues to be used for
disseminating information to small, dispersed communities. Snapchat won over a number of big
news names this year for its group of Discover publishers: CNN, NBC, The New York Times all
joined, and the platform plans on continuing to bring in others.
For five of the six remaining sites asked about – Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, LinkedIn and
Tumblr –users were about as likely to get news from each as they were last year. The last site,
WhatsApp, was asked about for the first time this year, and nearly a quarter, 23%, of its users get
news there.
6
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
Overall, Facebook outstrips all other social media sites as a source of news; YouTube now
reaches second highest percentage
Looking at the population as a whole, Facebook by far still leads every other social media site as a
source of news. This is largely
due to Facebook’s large user
base, compared with other
platforms, and the fact that
most of its users get news on
the site. Specifically, about
two-thirds of Americans (66%)
use Facebook, and a majority
of those users get news on the
site, similar to 2016. Looked at
as a portion of all U.S. adults,
this translates into just under
half (45%) of Americans
getting news on Facebook.
Even though YouTube has a
large user base – 58% of the
population – a smaller portion
gets news there. In 2017, both
the user base and the share
getting news on YouTube
grew. The result: 18% of all
Americans now get news on
YouTube, making it the second
most common social media
site for news – albeit still far
behind Facebook.
Twitter has the reverse structure from YouTube: While a large share of its users get news on the
site (74% say they do), its audience is significantly smaller overall. This means that overall, fewer
Americans get news on Twitter (11% of U.S. adults).
Social media sites as pathways to news
% of U.S. adults who use each social media site and % of U.S. adults who get
news from each site
Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017.
“News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
7
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
15%
18
26
2013 2016 2017
Not only have Americans grown somewhat in their use of social media for news overall, but now
they are more likely than ever to get news from multiple social media sites. About one quarter of
all U.S. adults (26%) get news from two or more of these sites, up from 18% in 2016 and 15% in
2013.
News users of Instagram, Snapchat and WhatsApp are
particularly likely to get news on multiple social networks; at
least 90% of their news users get news on at least two social
media sites.
There are also some interesting differences in where the
overlaps occur – in other words, which sites tend to share users.
Instagram’s news users, for example, are much more likely to
also get news on Snapchat (40% do so) than are LinkedIn’s
news users (8% of LinkedIn news users also get news on
Snapchat), for example. But Facebook, with such a large news
user base, overlaps with just about every other social media
site: About half or more of news users (at least 48%) of each of
the other sites studied also get news on Facebook.
About one-in-four now get
news from multiple social
media sites
% of U.S. adults who get news on
two or more different social media
sites
Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017.
“News Use Across Social Media Platforms
2017”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
8
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
There are some key differences in the demographic makeup of each site’s news users. Instagram
and Snapchat news consumers are considerably more likely to be nonwhite and younger. Twitter
and LinkedIn have the largest share of college graduates among their news users – 59% of
LinkedIn’s news users have college degrees, as do 45% of Twitter’s news users. The news user
bases of the two largest sites – Facebook and YouTube – include more older Americans than those
of smaller sites such as Instagram and Snapchat.
Snapchat has by far the youngest group of news users – 82% are ages 18-29. While Facebook and
YouTube are still the most popular among this age group for news overall, the makeup of the app’s
news audience means that about one-in-five (21%) 18- to 29-year-olds now get news on Snapchat.
Social media news user profiles
% of each social media site’s news users who are …
Note: Tumblr, Reddit, and WhatsApp not shown. Nonwhite includes all racial and ethnic groups, except non-Hispanic white.
Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017.
“News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
9
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
33%
25
21
30
22
30
37
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Instagram
Snapchat
LinkedIn
All adults
Local TV
24%
24
28
27
20
29
28
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Instagram
Snapchat
LinkedIn
All adults
Cable TV
20%
18
15
22
12
22
26
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Instagram
Snapchat
LinkedIn
All adults
Network nightly TV
33%
44
55
48
49
58
33
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Instagram
Snapchat
LinkedIn
All adults
News websites/apps
24%
26
29
26
15
34
25
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Instagram
Snapchat
LinkedIn
All adults
Radio
11%
9
11
11
5
16
18
Facebook
YouTube
Twitter
Instagram
Snapchat
LinkedIn
All adults
Print newspapers
Getting news on social media doesn’t mean that other more traditional pathways to news are
ignored. Many social media news users also get news from a variety of other platforms, although
there are some differences among the users of the various sites. Twitter news users, for example,
are more likely to also often get news via news websites and apps than Facebook or YouTube news
users. Facebook news users are more likely to often get news from local TV than those on
YouTube, Twitter and Snapchat.
Use of traditional news platforms by social media news users
% of each social media site’s news users who often get news from …
Note: Reddit, Tumblr, and WhatsApp not shown.
Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017 among U.S. adults.
“News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017”
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
10
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
Acknowledgments
This report was made possible by The Pew Charitable Trusts. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary
of the Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. This report is a collaborative effort based on the
input and analysis of the following individuals. Find related reports online at: journalism.org.
Amy Mitchell, Director, Journalism Research
Elisa Shearer, Research Analyst
Jeffrey Gottfried, Senior Researcher
Sophia Fedeli, Research Assistant
Galen Stocking, Research Associate
Katerina Eva Matsa, Senior Researcher
Margaret Porteus, Information Graphics Designer
Rachel Weisel, Communications Manager
Hannah Klein, Communications Associate
Shannon Greenwood, Associate Digital Producer
11
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
Methodology
The American Trends Panel (ATP), created by Pew Research Center, is a nationally representative
panel of randomly selected U.S. adults recruited from landline and cellphone random-digit-dial
(RDD) surveys. Panelists participate via monthly self-administered web surveys. Panelists who do
not have internet access are provided with a tablet and wireless internet connection. The panel is
being managed by Abt Associates.
Data in this report are drawn from the panel wave conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017, among 4,971
respondents. The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 4,971 respondents is plus or
minus 2.5 percentage points.
Members of the American Trends Panel were recruited from several large, national landline and
cellphone random-digit-dial surveys conducted in English and Spanish. At the end of each survey,
respondents were invited to join the panel. The first group of panelists was recruited from the
2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey, conducted from Jan. 23 to March 16, 2014. Of the
10,013 adults interviewed, 9,809 were invited to take part in the panel, and a total of 5,338 agreed
to participate.2 The second group of panelists was recruited from the 2015 Pew Research Center
Survey on Government, conducted from Aug. 27 to Oct. 4, 2015. Of the 6,004 adults interviewed,
all were invited to join the panel, and 2,976 agreed to participate.3 The third group of panelists was
recruited from a survey conducted from April 25 to June 4, 2017. Of the 5,012 adults interviewed
in the survey or pretest, 3,905 were invited to take part in the panel and a total of 1,628 agreed to
participate.4
The ATP data were weighted in a multi-step process that begins with a base weight incorporating
the respondents’ original survey selection probability and the fact that in 2014 some panelists were
subsampled for invitation to the panel. Next, an adjustment was made for the fact that the
propensity to join the panel and remain an active panelist varied across different groups in the
sample. The final step in the weighting uses an iterative technique that aligns the sample to
population benchmarks on a number of dimensions. Gender, age, education, race, Hispanic origin
and region parameters come from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2015 American Community Survey.
The county-level population density parameter (deciles) comes from the 2010 U.S. Decennial
2 When data collection for the 2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey began, non-internet users were subsampled at a rate of 25%,
but a decision was made shortly thereafter to invite all non-internet users to join. In total, 83% of non-internet users were invited to join the
panel.
3 Respondents to the 2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey who indicated that they are internet users but refused to provide an
email address were initially permitted to participate in the American Trends Panel by mail but were no longer permitted to join the panel after
Feb. 6, 2014. Internet users from the 2015 Pew Research Center Survey on Government who refused to provide an email address were not
permitted to join the panel.
4 White, non-Hispanic college graduates were subsampled at a rate of 50%.
12
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
Census. The telephone service benchmark comes from the January-June 2016 National Health
Interview Survey and is projected to 2017. The volunteerism benchmark comes from the 2015
Current Population Survey Volunteer Supplement. The party affiliation benchmark is the average
of the three most recent Pew Research Center general public telephone surveys. The Internet
access benchmark comes from the 2017 ATP Panel Refresh Survey. Respondents who did not
previously have internet access are treated as not having internet access for weighting purposes.
Respondents were also weighted according to their previously reported usage of eight different
social networks for news consumption. The variables used for this weighting were measured on
the January-February 2016 wave of the ATP and were weighted to match a Pew Research Center
journalism survey from March-April 2016. For panelists who did not participate in the 2016
survey, these variables were imputed using chained equations. Sampling errors and statistical tests
of significance take into account the effect of weighting. Interviews are conducted in both English
and Spanish, but the Hispanic sample in the American Trends Panel is predominantly native born
and English speaking.
The following table shows the unweighted sample sizes and the error attributable to sampling that
would be expected at the 95% level of confidence for different groups in the survey:
Group
Unweighted
sample size Plus or minus …
Total sample 4,971 2.5
Sample sizes and sampling errors for other subgroups are available upon request.
In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical
difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.
The August 2017 wave had a response rate of 74% (4,971 responses among 6,722 individuals in the
panel). Taking account of the combined, weighted response rate for the recruitment surveys
(10.0%) and attrition from panel members who were removed at their request or for inactivity, the
cumulative response rate for the wave is 2.6 %.5
© Pew Research Center, 2017
5 Approximately once per year, panelists who have not participated in multiple consecutive waves are removed from the panel. These cases
are counted in the denominator of cumulative response rates.
13
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
Topline questionnaire
2017 PEW RESEARCH CENTER’S AMERICAN TRENDS PANEL
WAVE 28 August
FINAL TOPLINE
Aug. 8-Aug. 21, 2017
TOTAL N=4,971
Now, thinking about your general news habits …
ASK ALL:
NEWS_PLATFORM How often do you … [RANDOMIZE]
Often Sometimes
Hardly
ever Never
No
Answer
a. Read any newspapers in print?
Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 18 25 32 25 *
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 20 28 31 21 *
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 27 27 27 19 *
b. Listen to news on the radio?
Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 25 31 22 21 *
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 25 34 24 17 *
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 26 30 27 18 *
NO ITEM C
d. Watch local television news?
Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 37 27 21 15 *
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 466
27 17 10 *
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 46 26 17 11 *
e. Watch national evening
network television news (such
as ABC World News, CBS
Evening News, or NBC Nightly
News)?
Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 26 25 25 25 *
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 30 27 25 17 *
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 31 28 24 18 *
f. Watch cable television news
(such as CNN, The Fox News
cable channel, or MSNBC)?
Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 28 27 23 22 *
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 31 27 24 18 *
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 24 28 26 21 *
6
In the Spanish language version of the questionnaire, “local television news” was mistranslated as “television news” for NEWS_PLATFORM
item D. This affected the 66 respondents who took the survey in Spanish (4% of the sample after weighting). The effects of this mistranslation
were minimal and do not affect the report’s substantive conclusions.
14
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
Often Sometimes
Hardly
ever Never
No
Answer
NEWS_PLATFORM CONTINUED …
g. Get news from a social media site
(such as Facebook, Twitter, or
Snapchat?)?
Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 20 27 20 33 0
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 18 26 18 38 *
h. Get news from a news website or
app?
Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 33 31 19 17 *
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 28 28 18 26 *
ASK ALL INTERNET USERS (F_INTUSER_FINAL=1) [N=4,752]:
SNS Do you use any of the following social media sites?
[Check all that apply] [RANDOMIZE WITH “OTHER” ALWAYS LAST]
BASED ON TOTAL Selected
Not
Selected No Answer
a. Facebook
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 66 34 -
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 67 33 -
Mar 13-15, 20-22, 2015 [N=2,035] 66 34 1
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 64 36 *
b. Twitter
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 15 85 -
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 16 84 -
Mar 13-15, 20-22, 2015 [N=2,035] 17 83 1
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 16 84 *
NO ITEM C
d. LinkedIn
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 21 79 -
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 20 80 -
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 19 80 *
e. Instagram
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 26 74 -
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 19 81 -
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 12 88 *
NO ITEM F
g. Tumblr
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 4 96 -
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 4 96 -
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 4 96 *
15
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
Selected
Not
Selected No Answer
SNS CONTINUED …
h. YouTube
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 58 42 -
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 48 52 -
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 51 49 *
i. Reddit
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 6 94 -
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 4 96 -
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 3 97 *
j. Snapchat
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 18 82 -
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 10 90 -
k. WhatsApp
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 11 89 -
l. Other
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 5 95 -
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 11 89 -
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 3 97 *
ASK IF AT LEAST YES TO 1 ITEM SNS; SHOW ONLY THOSE SITES USED (SNSA-K=1):
SNSNEWS Do you ever get news or news headlines on any of the following sites? By news we mean
information about events and issues that involve more than just your friends or family.
[RANDOMIZE]
Yes No
No
Answer
BASED ON FACEBOOK USERS:
a. Facebook
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=3,635] 68 32 1
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=3,210] 66 34 *
Mar 13-15, 20-22, 2015 [N=1,343] 63 37 *
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=3,268] 47 53 0
BASED ON TWITTER USERS:
b. Twitter
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=1,088] 74 25 1
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=908] 59 41 1
Mar 13-15, 20-22, 2015 [N=347] 63 37 0
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=736] 52 48 0
NO ITEM C
BASED ON LINKEDIN USERS:
d. LinkedIn
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=1,540] 23 76 1
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=1,348] 19 81 *
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=1,107] 13 87 0
16
PEW RESEARCH CENTER
www.pewresearch.org
Yes No
No
Answer
SNSNEWS CONTINUED …
BASED ON INSTAGRAM USERS:
e. Instagram
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=1,390] 27 71 2
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=933] 23 76 1
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=467] 13 87 0
NO ITEM F
BASED ON TUMBLR USERS:
g. Tumblr
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=226] 39 60 1
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=198] 31 69 -
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=159] 29 71 0
BASED ON YOUTUBE USERS:
h. YouTube
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=3,180] 32 67 1
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=2,542] 21 77 1
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=2,506] 20 80 0
BASED ON REDDIT USERS:
i. Reddit
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=369] 68 32 *
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=288] 70 30 *
Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=114] 62 38 0
BASED ON SNAPCHAT USERS:
j. Snapchat
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=787] 29 70 2
Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=439] 17 82 1
BASED ON WHATSAPP USERS:
k. WhatsApp
Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=585] 23 74 3

More Related Content

What's hot

Burson-Marsteller DC Advocacy Groups Social Media Study Final
Burson-Marsteller DC Advocacy Groups Social Media Study FinalBurson-Marsteller DC Advocacy Groups Social Media Study Final
Burson-Marsteller DC Advocacy Groups Social Media Study FinalBurson-Marsteller
 
Rt for Trump, Fav for Clinton
Rt for Trump, Fav for ClintonRt for Trump, Fav for Clinton
Rt for Trump, Fav for ClintonHayden Miller
 
understanding-the-participatory-news-consumer-100301062153-phpapp02.pdf
understanding-the-participatory-news-consumer-100301062153-phpapp02.pdfunderstanding-the-participatory-news-consumer-100301062153-phpapp02.pdf
understanding-the-participatory-news-consumer-100301062153-phpapp02.pdfAnjanette Delgado
 
FINAL PRINT -Engagement in the Details - AN ANALYSIS OF READER INTERACTION AC...
FINAL PRINT -Engagement in the Details - AN ANALYSIS OF READER INTERACTION AC...FINAL PRINT -Engagement in the Details - AN ANALYSIS OF READER INTERACTION AC...
FINAL PRINT -Engagement in the Details - AN ANALYSIS OF READER INTERACTION AC...Nathan J Stone
 
Grasso Fake News Final Presentation
Grasso Fake News Final PresentationGrasso Fake News Final Presentation
Grasso Fake News Final PresentationBrian Grasso
 
Prime "Social" Ministers - François Hollande Analysis
Prime "Social" Ministers - François Hollande AnalysisPrime "Social" Ministers - François Hollande Analysis
Prime "Social" Ministers - François Hollande AnalysisDOING
 
Prime "Social" Ministers - Mariano Rajoy Analysis
Prime "Social" Ministers - Mariano Rajoy AnalysisPrime "Social" Ministers - Mariano Rajoy Analysis
Prime "Social" Ministers - Mariano Rajoy AnalysisDOING
 
Prime social ministers - David Cameron Analysis
Prime social ministers - David Cameron AnalysisPrime social ministers - David Cameron Analysis
Prime social ministers - David Cameron AnalysisDOING
 
Social Media: the good, the bad and the ugly
Social Media: the good, the bad and the uglySocial Media: the good, the bad and the ugly
Social Media: the good, the bad and the uglyJosh Cowls
 
Young adults want news every day, survey shows
Young adults want news every day, survey showsYoung adults want news every day, survey shows
Young adults want news every day, survey showsjealouslattice367
 
Social media negativity fys 100
Social media negativity fys 100Social media negativity fys 100
Social media negativity fys 100DevinAHankins
 

What's hot (17)

Digital Politics: Pew Research findings on technology and campaign 2012
Digital Politics: Pew Research findings on technology and campaign 2012Digital Politics: Pew Research findings on technology and campaign 2012
Digital Politics: Pew Research findings on technology and campaign 2012
 
ICDM 2017 tutorial misinformation
ICDM 2017 tutorial misinformationICDM 2017 tutorial misinformation
ICDM 2017 tutorial misinformation
 
Burson-Marsteller DC Advocacy Groups Social Media Study Final
Burson-Marsteller DC Advocacy Groups Social Media Study FinalBurson-Marsteller DC Advocacy Groups Social Media Study Final
Burson-Marsteller DC Advocacy Groups Social Media Study Final
 
Rt for Trump, Fav for Clinton
Rt for Trump, Fav for ClintonRt for Trump, Fav for Clinton
Rt for Trump, Fav for Clinton
 
understanding-the-participatory-news-consumer-100301062153-phpapp02.pdf
understanding-the-participatory-news-consumer-100301062153-phpapp02.pdfunderstanding-the-participatory-news-consumer-100301062153-phpapp02.pdf
understanding-the-participatory-news-consumer-100301062153-phpapp02.pdf
 
Social Journalism Study 2012 - Sweden
Social Journalism Study 2012 - SwedenSocial Journalism Study 2012 - Sweden
Social Journalism Study 2012 - Sweden
 
Facebook news-full-report-05.23.19
Facebook news-full-report-05.23.19Facebook news-full-report-05.23.19
Facebook news-full-report-05.23.19
 
FINAL PRINT -Engagement in the Details - AN ANALYSIS OF READER INTERACTION AC...
FINAL PRINT -Engagement in the Details - AN ANALYSIS OF READER INTERACTION AC...FINAL PRINT -Engagement in the Details - AN ANALYSIS OF READER INTERACTION AC...
FINAL PRINT -Engagement in the Details - AN ANALYSIS OF READER INTERACTION AC...
 
Grasso Fake News Final Presentation
Grasso Fake News Final PresentationGrasso Fake News Final Presentation
Grasso Fake News Final Presentation
 
Social media and civic life
Social media and civic lifeSocial media and civic life
Social media and civic life
 
Prime "Social" Ministers - François Hollande Analysis
Prime "Social" Ministers - François Hollande AnalysisPrime "Social" Ministers - François Hollande Analysis
Prime "Social" Ministers - François Hollande Analysis
 
Prime "Social" Ministers - Mariano Rajoy Analysis
Prime "Social" Ministers - Mariano Rajoy AnalysisPrime "Social" Ministers - Mariano Rajoy Analysis
Prime "Social" Ministers - Mariano Rajoy Analysis
 
Pj 2018.09.25 media-attitudes
Pj 2018.09.25 media-attitudesPj 2018.09.25 media-attitudes
Pj 2018.09.25 media-attitudes
 
Prime social ministers - David Cameron Analysis
Prime social ministers - David Cameron AnalysisPrime social ministers - David Cameron Analysis
Prime social ministers - David Cameron Analysis
 
Social Media: the good, the bad and the ugly
Social Media: the good, the bad and the uglySocial Media: the good, the bad and the ugly
Social Media: the good, the bad and the ugly
 
Young adults want news every day, survey shows
Young adults want news every day, survey showsYoung adults want news every day, survey shows
Young adults want news every day, survey shows
 
Social media negativity fys 100
Social media negativity fys 100Social media negativity fys 100
Social media negativity fys 100
 

Similar to News use across social media platforms 2017

FOR RELEASE MAY 31, 2018 BY Monica Anderson and Ji
FOR RELEASE MAY 31, 2018 BY Monica Anderson and JiFOR RELEASE MAY 31, 2018 BY Monica Anderson and Ji
FOR RELEASE MAY 31, 2018 BY Monica Anderson and JiShainaBoling829
 
EMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION UNTIL 0.docx
EMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION UNTIL 0.docxEMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION UNTIL 0.docx
EMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION UNTIL 0.docxSALU18
 
Twitter and Instagram - WIU HR Training Session 2.16.16
Twitter and Instagram - WIU HR Training Session 2.16.16Twitter and Instagram - WIU HR Training Session 2.16.16
Twitter and Instagram - WIU HR Training Session 2.16.16Teresa Koltzenburg
 
Comparison emal vs social media
Comparison emal vs social mediaComparison emal vs social media
Comparison emal vs social mediaJeroen Vos
 
Pew research social media update 2014
Pew research social media update 2014Pew research social media update 2014
Pew research social media update 2014PNMI
 
Brazilian journalists and social networks
Brazilian journalists and social networksBrazilian journalists and social networks
Brazilian journalists and social networksPR Newswire
 
Running head ANNOTATED OUTLINE .docx
Running head ANNOTATED OUTLINE                                  .docxRunning head ANNOTATED OUTLINE                                  .docx
Running head ANNOTATED OUTLINE .docxtoddr4
 
Social Networking Sites & Ourl Lves
Social Networking Sites & Ourl LvesSocial Networking Sites & Ourl Lves
Social Networking Sites & Ourl LvesPatty Bender
 
2011 Pew Social Media and Life Report
2011 Pew Social Media and Life Report2011 Pew Social Media and Life Report
2011 Pew Social Media and Life ReportMatthew Rathbun
 
Pew Internet Trends :Social networking and Seniors
Pew Internet Trends :Social networking  and SeniorsPew Internet Trends :Social networking  and Seniors
Pew Internet Trends :Social networking and SeniorsSumit Roy
 
Pip social networking sites and our lives
Pip social networking sites and our livesPip social networking sites and our lives
Pip social networking sites and our livesnich_marketing
 
NAAS Presentation: Social Media Usage at Spanish-language Newspapers
NAAS Presentation: Social Media Usage at Spanish-language NewspapersNAAS Presentation: Social Media Usage at Spanish-language Newspapers
NAAS Presentation: Social Media Usage at Spanish-language NewspapersTexas Wesleyan University
 
Pip social networking sites and our lives
Pip   social networking sites and our livesPip   social networking sites and our lives
Pip social networking sites and our livesLong Tran Huy
 
Chapter 8 Links and Info The following story comes from th.docx
Chapter 8 Links and Info The following story comes from th.docxChapter 8 Links and Info The following story comes from th.docx
Chapter 8 Links and Info The following story comes from th.docxbissacr
 
The truth behind filter bubbles: bursting some myths
The truth behind filter bubbles: bursting some mythsThe truth behind filter bubbles: bursting some myths
The truth behind filter bubbles: bursting some mythsEduardoSuarez87
 

Similar to News use across social media platforms 2017 (20)

FOR RELEASE MAY 31, 2018 BY Monica Anderson and Ji
FOR RELEASE MAY 31, 2018 BY Monica Anderson and JiFOR RELEASE MAY 31, 2018 BY Monica Anderson and Ji
FOR RELEASE MAY 31, 2018 BY Monica Anderson and Ji
 
EMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION UNTIL 0.docx
EMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION UNTIL 0.docxEMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION UNTIL 0.docx
EMBARGOED COPY – NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION UNTIL 0.docx
 
Twitter and Instagram - WIU HR Training Session 2.16.16
Twitter and Instagram - WIU HR Training Session 2.16.16Twitter and Instagram - WIU HR Training Session 2.16.16
Twitter and Instagram - WIU HR Training Session 2.16.16
 
Comparison emal vs social media
Comparison emal vs social mediaComparison emal vs social media
Comparison emal vs social media
 
Pew research social media update 2014
Pew research social media update 2014Pew research social media update 2014
Pew research social media update 2014
 
Brazilian journalists and social networks
Brazilian journalists and social networksBrazilian journalists and social networks
Brazilian journalists and social networks
 
Running head ANNOTATED OUTLINE .docx
Running head ANNOTATED OUTLINE                                  .docxRunning head ANNOTATED OUTLINE                                  .docx
Running head ANNOTATED OUTLINE .docx
 
Social Networking Sites & Ourl Lves
Social Networking Sites & Ourl LvesSocial Networking Sites & Ourl Lves
Social Networking Sites & Ourl Lves
 
2011 Pew Social Media and Life Report
2011 Pew Social Media and Life Report2011 Pew Social Media and Life Report
2011 Pew Social Media and Life Report
 
Pew Internet Trends :Social networking and Seniors
Pew Internet Trends :Social networking  and SeniorsPew Internet Trends :Social networking  and Seniors
Pew Internet Trends :Social networking and Seniors
 
Pip social networking sites and our lives
Pip social networking sites and our livesPip social networking sites and our lives
Pip social networking sites and our lives
 
NAAS Presentation: Social Media Usage at Spanish-language Newspapers
NAAS Presentation: Social Media Usage at Spanish-language NewspapersNAAS Presentation: Social Media Usage at Spanish-language Newspapers
NAAS Presentation: Social Media Usage at Spanish-language Newspapers
 
Understanding The Participatory News Consumer
Understanding The  Participatory  News  ConsumerUnderstanding The  Participatory  News  Consumer
Understanding The Participatory News Consumer
 
Understanding The Participatory News Consumer
Understanding The Participatory News ConsumerUnderstanding The Participatory News Consumer
Understanding The Participatory News Consumer
 
Understanding The Participatory News Consumer
Understanding The Participatory News ConsumerUnderstanding The Participatory News Consumer
Understanding The Participatory News Consumer
 
Pip social networking sites and our lives
Pip   social networking sites and our livesPip   social networking sites and our lives
Pip social networking sites and our lives
 
Chapter 8 Links and Info The following story comes from th.docx
Chapter 8 Links and Info The following story comes from th.docxChapter 8 Links and Info The following story comes from th.docx
Chapter 8 Links and Info The following story comes from th.docx
 
The truth behind filter bubbles: bursting some myths
The truth behind filter bubbles: bursting some mythsThe truth behind filter bubbles: bursting some myths
The truth behind filter bubbles: bursting some myths
 
The state of social media
The state of social mediaThe state of social media
The state of social media
 
Pew Research findings on politics and advocacy in the social media era
Pew Research findings on politics and advocacy in the social media eraPew Research findings on politics and advocacy in the social media era
Pew Research findings on politics and advocacy in the social media era
 

More from Tel-Aviv Journalists' Association

התנועה לחופש המידע נגד משרד האוצר ואחרים
התנועה לחופש המידע נגד משרד האוצר ואחריםהתנועה לחופש המידע נגד משרד האוצר ואחרים
התנועה לחופש המידע נגד משרד האוצר ואחריםTel-Aviv Journalists' Association
 
בועז ניצן נגד היועץ המשפטי לממשלה
בועז ניצן נגד היועץ המשפטי לממשלהבועז ניצן נגד היועץ המשפטי לממשלה
בועז ניצן נגד היועץ המשפטי לממשלהTel-Aviv Journalists' Association
 
פרופ' יאיר אורון ואחרים נגד משרד החוץ ואחרים
פרופ' יאיר אורון ואחרים נגד משרד החוץ ואחריםפרופ' יאיר אורון ואחרים נגד משרד החוץ ואחרים
פרופ' יאיר אורון ואחרים נגד משרד החוץ ואחריםTel-Aviv Journalists' Association
 
מועצה מקומית מג'דל שמס ואח' נ' ג'והרי ואח'
מועצה מקומית מג'דל שמס ואח' נ' ג'והרי ואח'מועצה מקומית מג'דל שמס ואח' נ' ג'והרי ואח'
מועצה מקומית מג'דל שמס ואח' נ' ג'והרי ואח'Tel-Aviv Journalists' Association
 
יואל וגלית שאול נגד חברת ניידלי תקשורת בע"מ
יואל וגלית שאול נגד חברת ניידלי תקשורת בע"מיואל וגלית שאול נגד חברת ניידלי תקשורת בע"מ
יואל וגלית שאול נגד חברת ניידלי תקשורת בע"מTel-Aviv Journalists' Association
 
ברוך קרא ו"המקור" נגד מדינת ישראל, גבי אשכנזי ואח'
ברוך קרא ו"המקור" נגד מדינת ישראל, גבי אשכנזי ואח'ברוך קרא ו"המקור" נגד מדינת ישראל, גבי אשכנזי ואח'
ברוך קרא ו"המקור" נגד מדינת ישראל, גבי אשכנזי ואח'Tel-Aviv Journalists' Association
 
יונתן אוריך, עופר גולן, יוסי שלום וישראל איינהורן נגד משטרת ישראל
יונתן אוריך, עופר גולן, יוסי שלום וישראל איינהורן נגד משטרת ישראליונתן אוריך, עופר גולן, יוסי שלום וישראל איינהורן נגד משטרת ישראל
יונתן אוריך, עופר גולן, יוסי שלום וישראל איינהורן נגד משטרת ישראלTel-Aviv Journalists' Association
 
ד"ר שלמה סוויסה נ' תומר גלאם ראש עיריית אשקלון
ד"ר שלמה סוויסה נ' תומר גלאם ראש עיריית אשקלוןד"ר שלמה סוויסה נ' תומר גלאם ראש עיריית אשקלון
ד"ר שלמה סוויסה נ' תומר גלאם ראש עיריית אשקלוןTel-Aviv Journalists' Association
 

More from Tel-Aviv Journalists' Association (20)

רינת חזן נגד אברהם לונשטיין
רינת חזן נגד אברהם לונשטייןרינת חזן נגד אברהם לונשטיין
רינת חזן נגד אברהם לונשטיין
 
התנועה לחופש המידע נגד משרד האוצר ואחרים
התנועה לחופש המידע נגד משרד האוצר ואחריםהתנועה לחופש המידע נגד משרד האוצר ואחרים
התנועה לחופש המידע נגד משרד האוצר ואחרים
 
בועז ניצן נגד היועץ המשפטי לממשלה
בועז ניצן נגד היועץ המשפטי לממשלהבועז ניצן נגד היועץ המשפטי לממשלה
בועז ניצן נגד היועץ המשפטי לממשלה
 
שגיא נגד צורי ואחרים
שגיא נגד צורי ואחריםשגיא נגד צורי ואחרים
שגיא נגד צורי ואחרים
 
כתב תביעה גיא ניר נגד הדס שטייף
כתב תביעה גיא ניר נגד הדס שטייףכתב תביעה גיא ניר נגד הדס שטייף
כתב תביעה גיא ניר נגד הדס שטייף
 
פרופ' יאיר אורון ואחרים נגד משרד החוץ ואחרים
פרופ' יאיר אורון ואחרים נגד משרד החוץ ואחריםפרופ' יאיר אורון ואחרים נגד משרד החוץ ואחרים
פרופ' יאיר אורון ואחרים נגד משרד החוץ ואחרים
 
לוין נ' טייקאייר ישראל בע"מ ואח'
 לוין נ' טייקאייר ישראל בע"מ ואח' לוין נ' טייקאייר ישראל בע"מ ואח'
לוין נ' טייקאייר ישראל בע"מ ואח'
 
דורון כהן נגד מדינת ישראל
דורון כהן נגד מדינת ישראלדורון כהן נגד מדינת ישראל
דורון כהן נגד מדינת ישראל
 
מועצה מקומית מג'דל שמס ואח' נ' ג'והרי ואח'
מועצה מקומית מג'דל שמס ואח' נ' ג'והרי ואח'מועצה מקומית מג'דל שמס ואח' נ' ג'והרי ואח'
מועצה מקומית מג'דל שמס ואח' נ' ג'והרי ואח'
 
סולו איטליה בע"מ ואח' נ' בוטגה
סולו איטליה בע"מ ואח' נ' בוטגהסולו איטליה בע"מ ואח' נ' בוטגה
סולו איטליה בע"מ ואח' נ' בוטגה
 
Internetreport 2019
Internetreport 2019Internetreport 2019
Internetreport 2019
 
יואל וגלית שאול נגד חברת ניידלי תקשורת בע"מ
יואל וגלית שאול נגד חברת ניידלי תקשורת בע"מיואל וגלית שאול נגד חברת ניידלי תקשורת בע"מ
יואל וגלית שאול נגד חברת ניידלי תקשורת בע"מ
 
מאירי נגד פאנדר
מאירי נגד פאנדרמאירי נגד פאנדר
מאירי נגד פאנדר
 
ברוך קרא ו"המקור" נגד מדינת ישראל, גבי אשכנזי ואח'
ברוך קרא ו"המקור" נגד מדינת ישראל, גבי אשכנזי ואח'ברוך קרא ו"המקור" נגד מדינת ישראל, גבי אשכנזי ואח'
ברוך קרא ו"המקור" נגד מדינת ישראל, גבי אשכנזי ואח'
 
יונתן אוריך, עופר גולן, יוסי שלום וישראל איינהורן נגד משטרת ישראל
יונתן אוריך, עופר גולן, יוסי שלום וישראל איינהורן נגד משטרת ישראליונתן אוריך, עופר גולן, יוסי שלום וישראל איינהורן נגד משטרת ישראל
יונתן אוריך, עופר גולן, יוסי שלום וישראל איינהורן נגד משטרת ישראל
 
הלוי נגד גניש
הלוי נגד גנישהלוי נגד גניש
הלוי נגד גניש
 
גרשוני ואח' נ' רוזנבלום ואח
גרשוני ואח' נ' רוזנבלום ואחגרשוני ואח' נ' רוזנבלום ואח
גרשוני ואח' נ' רוזנבלום ואח
 
קרן נגד ליבר ואח'
קרן נגד ליבר ואח'קרן נגד ליבר ואח'
קרן נגד ליבר ואח'
 
ד"ר שלמה סוויסה נ' תומר גלאם ראש עיריית אשקלון
ד"ר שלמה סוויסה נ' תומר גלאם ראש עיריית אשקלוןד"ר שלמה סוויסה נ' תומר גלאם ראש עיריית אשקלון
ד"ר שלמה סוויסה נ' תומר גלאם ראש עיריית אשקלון
 
עמוס דב סילבר נגד שב"ס
עמוס דב סילבר נגד שב"סעמוס דב סילבר נגד שב"ס
עמוס דב סילבר נגד שב"ס
 

Recently uploaded

定制(Lincoln毕业证书)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(Lincoln毕业证书)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(Lincoln毕业证书)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(Lincoln毕业证书)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一Fs
 
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝soniya singh
 
Chennai Call Girls Alwarpet Phone 🍆 8250192130 👅 celebrity escorts service
Chennai Call Girls Alwarpet Phone 🍆 8250192130 👅 celebrity escorts serviceChennai Call Girls Alwarpet Phone 🍆 8250192130 👅 celebrity escorts service
Chennai Call Girls Alwarpet Phone 🍆 8250192130 👅 celebrity escorts servicevipmodelshub1
 
Complet Documnetation for Smart Assistant Application for Disabled Person
Complet Documnetation   for Smart Assistant Application for Disabled PersonComplet Documnetation   for Smart Assistant Application for Disabled Person
Complet Documnetation for Smart Assistant Application for Disabled Personfurqan222004
 
Git and Github workshop GDSC MLRITM
Git and Github  workshop GDSC MLRITMGit and Github  workshop GDSC MLRITM
Git and Github workshop GDSC MLRITMgdsc13
 
定制(Management毕业证书)新加坡管理大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(Management毕业证书)新加坡管理大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(Management毕业证书)新加坡管理大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(Management毕业证书)新加坡管理大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一Fs
 
Magic exist by Marta Loveguard - presentation.pptx
Magic exist by Marta Loveguard - presentation.pptxMagic exist by Marta Loveguard - presentation.pptx
Magic exist by Marta Loveguard - presentation.pptxMartaLoveguard
 
Packaging the Monolith - PHP Tek 2024 (Breaking it down one bite at a time)
Packaging the Monolith - PHP Tek 2024 (Breaking it down one bite at a time)Packaging the Monolith - PHP Tek 2024 (Breaking it down one bite at a time)
Packaging the Monolith - PHP Tek 2024 (Breaking it down one bite at a time)Dana Luther
 
办理(UofR毕业证书)罗切斯特大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
办理(UofR毕业证书)罗切斯特大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一办理(UofR毕业证书)罗切斯特大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
办理(UofR毕业证书)罗切斯特大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一z xss
 
VIP Call Girls Kolkata Ananya 🤌 8250192130 🚀 Vip Call Girls Kolkata
VIP Call Girls Kolkata Ananya 🤌  8250192130 🚀 Vip Call Girls KolkataVIP Call Girls Kolkata Ananya 🤌  8250192130 🚀 Vip Call Girls Kolkata
VIP Call Girls Kolkata Ananya 🤌 8250192130 🚀 Vip Call Girls Kolkataanamikaraghav4
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Alambazar 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Alambazar 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl Alambazar 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Alambazar 👉 8250192130 Available With Roomdivyansh0kumar0
 
Potsdam FH学位证,波茨坦应用技术大学毕业证书1:1制作
Potsdam FH学位证,波茨坦应用技术大学毕业证书1:1制作Potsdam FH学位证,波茨坦应用技术大学毕业证书1:1制作
Potsdam FH学位证,波茨坦应用技术大学毕业证书1:1制作ys8omjxb
 
Contact Rya Baby for Call Girls New Delhi
Contact Rya Baby for Call Girls New DelhiContact Rya Baby for Call Girls New Delhi
Contact Rya Baby for Call Girls New Delhimiss dipika
 
Call Girls In The Ocean Pearl Retreat Hotel New Delhi 9873777170
Call Girls In The Ocean Pearl Retreat Hotel New Delhi 9873777170Call Girls In The Ocean Pearl Retreat Hotel New Delhi 9873777170
Call Girls In The Ocean Pearl Retreat Hotel New Delhi 9873777170Sonam Pathan
 
A Good Girl's Guide to Murder (A Good Girl's Guide to Murder, #1)
A Good Girl's Guide to Murder (A Good Girl's Guide to Murder, #1)A Good Girl's Guide to Murder (A Good Girl's Guide to Murder, #1)
A Good Girl's Guide to Murder (A Good Girl's Guide to Murder, #1)Christopher H Felton
 
Font Performance - NYC WebPerf Meetup April '24
Font Performance - NYC WebPerf Meetup April '24Font Performance - NYC WebPerf Meetup April '24
Font Performance - NYC WebPerf Meetup April '24Paul Calvano
 
定制(UAL学位证)英国伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(UAL学位证)英国伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(UAL学位证)英国伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(UAL学位证)英国伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一Fs
 
定制(AUT毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(AUT毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(AUT毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(AUT毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一Fs
 

Recently uploaded (20)

定制(Lincoln毕业证书)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(Lincoln毕业证书)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(Lincoln毕业证书)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(Lincoln毕业证书)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝Call Girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
Call Girls in Uttam Nagar Delhi 💯Call Us 🔝8264348440🔝
 
Chennai Call Girls Alwarpet Phone 🍆 8250192130 👅 celebrity escorts service
Chennai Call Girls Alwarpet Phone 🍆 8250192130 👅 celebrity escorts serviceChennai Call Girls Alwarpet Phone 🍆 8250192130 👅 celebrity escorts service
Chennai Call Girls Alwarpet Phone 🍆 8250192130 👅 celebrity escorts service
 
Complet Documnetation for Smart Assistant Application for Disabled Person
Complet Documnetation   for Smart Assistant Application for Disabled PersonComplet Documnetation   for Smart Assistant Application for Disabled Person
Complet Documnetation for Smart Assistant Application for Disabled Person
 
Git and Github workshop GDSC MLRITM
Git and Github  workshop GDSC MLRITMGit and Github  workshop GDSC MLRITM
Git and Github workshop GDSC MLRITM
 
定制(Management毕业证书)新加坡管理大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(Management毕业证书)新加坡管理大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(Management毕业证书)新加坡管理大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(Management毕业证书)新加坡管理大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
Model Call Girl in Jamuna Vihar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in  Jamuna Vihar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in  Jamuna Vihar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Jamuna Vihar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
Magic exist by Marta Loveguard - presentation.pptx
Magic exist by Marta Loveguard - presentation.pptxMagic exist by Marta Loveguard - presentation.pptx
Magic exist by Marta Loveguard - presentation.pptx
 
Packaging the Monolith - PHP Tek 2024 (Breaking it down one bite at a time)
Packaging the Monolith - PHP Tek 2024 (Breaking it down one bite at a time)Packaging the Monolith - PHP Tek 2024 (Breaking it down one bite at a time)
Packaging the Monolith - PHP Tek 2024 (Breaking it down one bite at a time)
 
办理(UofR毕业证书)罗切斯特大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
办理(UofR毕业证书)罗切斯特大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一办理(UofR毕业证书)罗切斯特大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
办理(UofR毕业证书)罗切斯特大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
VIP Call Girls Kolkata Ananya 🤌 8250192130 🚀 Vip Call Girls Kolkata
VIP Call Girls Kolkata Ananya 🤌  8250192130 🚀 Vip Call Girls KolkataVIP Call Girls Kolkata Ananya 🤌  8250192130 🚀 Vip Call Girls Kolkata
VIP Call Girls Kolkata Ananya 🤌 8250192130 🚀 Vip Call Girls Kolkata
 
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Alambazar 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Alambazar 👉 8250192130  Available With RoomVIP Kolkata Call Girl Alambazar 👉 8250192130  Available With Room
VIP Kolkata Call Girl Alambazar 👉 8250192130 Available With Room
 
Potsdam FH学位证,波茨坦应用技术大学毕业证书1:1制作
Potsdam FH学位证,波茨坦应用技术大学毕业证书1:1制作Potsdam FH学位证,波茨坦应用技术大学毕业证书1:1制作
Potsdam FH学位证,波茨坦应用技术大学毕业证书1:1制作
 
young call girls in Uttam Nagar🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Uttam Nagar🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Serviceyoung call girls in Uttam Nagar🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
young call girls in Uttam Nagar🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
 
Contact Rya Baby for Call Girls New Delhi
Contact Rya Baby for Call Girls New DelhiContact Rya Baby for Call Girls New Delhi
Contact Rya Baby for Call Girls New Delhi
 
Call Girls In The Ocean Pearl Retreat Hotel New Delhi 9873777170
Call Girls In The Ocean Pearl Retreat Hotel New Delhi 9873777170Call Girls In The Ocean Pearl Retreat Hotel New Delhi 9873777170
Call Girls In The Ocean Pearl Retreat Hotel New Delhi 9873777170
 
A Good Girl's Guide to Murder (A Good Girl's Guide to Murder, #1)
A Good Girl's Guide to Murder (A Good Girl's Guide to Murder, #1)A Good Girl's Guide to Murder (A Good Girl's Guide to Murder, #1)
A Good Girl's Guide to Murder (A Good Girl's Guide to Murder, #1)
 
Font Performance - NYC WebPerf Meetup April '24
Font Performance - NYC WebPerf Meetup April '24Font Performance - NYC WebPerf Meetup April '24
Font Performance - NYC WebPerf Meetup April '24
 
定制(UAL学位证)英国伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(UAL学位证)英国伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(UAL学位证)英国伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(UAL学位证)英国伦敦艺术大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
定制(AUT毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(AUT毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(AUT毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(AUT毕业证书)新西兰奥克兰理工大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 

News use across social media platforms 2017

  • 1. FOR RELEASE SEPTEMBER 6, 2017 BY Elisa Shearer and Jeffrey Gottfried FOR MEDIA OR OTHER INQUIRIES: Amy Mitchell, Director, Journalism Research Hannah Klein, Communications Associate 202.419.4372 www.pewresearch.org RECOMMENDED CITATION Pew Research Center, September, 2017, “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017”
  • 2. 1 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org About Pew Research Center Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping America and the world. It does not take policy positions. The Center conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, content analysis and other data-driven social science research. It studies U.S. politics and policy; journalism and media; internet, science and technology; religion and public life; Hispanic trends; global attitudes and trends; and U.S. social and demographic trends. All of the Center’s reports are available at www.pewresearch.org. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. © Pew Research Center 2017
  • 3. 2 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org 45% 55 78% 78 2016 2017 50+ Ages 18-49 60 6968 63 2016 2017 Some college or less College+ 64 74 62 64 2016 2017 Nonwhite White 2018% 27 26% 20 18% 20172016 62% 67 Often Sometimes Hardly ever News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017 As of August 2017, two-thirds (67%) of Americans report that they get at least some of their news on social media – with two- in-ten doing so often, according to a new survey from Pew Research Center. This is a modest increase since early 2016, when (during the height of the presidential primaries) 62% of U.S. adults reported getting news from social media. While a small increase overall, this growth is driven by more substantial increases among Americans who are older, less educated, and nonwhite. This study is based on a survey conducted August 8- 21, 2017, with 4,971 U.S. adults who are members of Pew Research Center’s nationally representative American Trends Panel. For the first time in the Center’s surveys, more than half (55%) of Americans ages 50 or older report getting news on social media sites. That is 10 percentage points higher than the 45% who said so in 2016. Those under 50, meanwhile, remain more likely than their elders to get news from these sites (78% do, Social media news use increases among older, nonwhite and less educated Americans % of U.S. adults who get news from social media sites … Note: Nonwhite includes all race and ethnic groups other than non-Hispanic whites. Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017. “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017” PEW RESEARCH CENTER In 2017, two-thirds of U.S. adults get news from social media % of U.S. adults who get news from social media sites … Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017. “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017” PEW RESEARCH CENTER
  • 4. 3 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org unchanged from 2016). Furthermore, about three-quarters of nonwhites (74%) get news on social media sites, up from 64% in 2016. This growth means that nonwhites1 are now more likely than whites to get news while on social media. And social media news use also increased among those with less than a bachelor’s degree, up nine percentage points from 60% in 2016 to 69% in 2017. Alternatively, among those with at least a college degree, social media news use declined slightly. 1 Nonwhite includes all racial and ethnic groups, except non-Hispanic white.
  • 5. 74% 32 29 59% 21 17 52% 20 Twitter YouTube '16-'17 CHANGE +15* +11* +12* 2017 2016 2013 Snapchat Sites where news usership increased since 2016 68 68 39 27 23 23 70 66 31 23 19 62 47 29 13 13 Reddit Facebook Tumblr Instagram LinkedIn -2 +2 +8 +4 +4 WhatsApp N/A Sites where news usership did not change since 2016 Twitter, YouTube and Snapchat have grown in share of users who get news on each site Because of the vastly different audience sizes across major social media sites, there are two different ways to think about measuring change in news use on these platforms. One is to compare the share of each site’s users that get news on the site, while the second is to measure the total percentage of Americans that report seeing news on the site. We first look at the share of each site’s users who get news there. Overall, three of the sites measured — Twitter, YouTube and Snapchat — had an increase in the share of their audience that gets news on the site. Since 2013, at least half of Twitter users have reported getting news on the site, but in 2017, with a president who frequently makes announcements on the platform, that share has increased to about three-quarters (74%), up 15 percentage points from last year. On YouTube, about a third of users now get news there (32%), up from 21% in 2016. And news use among Snapchat’s user base increased 12 percentage points to 29% in August 2017, up from 17% in early 2016. Growth on these three sites follows investments the companies have made over the last year in developing their news usability. Twitter, in addition to getting nearly daily attention from the president’s posts, spent the year promoting the platform’s potential for news publishers and has announced launches for multiple news streaming partnerships. YouTube launched and expanded YouTube TV, and the Twitter, YouTube and Snapchat have grown since 2016 in portion of users who get news on each site % of each social media site’s users who get news there *Change from 2016 to 2017 is statistically significant. Note: Snapchat not asked about in 2013. WhatsApp not asked about in 2013 or 2016. Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017. “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017” PEW RESEARCH CENTER
  • 6. 5 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org site added a “breaking news” summary on its homepage. It also continues to be used for disseminating information to small, dispersed communities. Snapchat won over a number of big news names this year for its group of Discover publishers: CNN, NBC, The New York Times all joined, and the platform plans on continuing to bring in others. For five of the six remaining sites asked about – Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, LinkedIn and Tumblr –users were about as likely to get news from each as they were last year. The last site, WhatsApp, was asked about for the first time this year, and nearly a quarter, 23%, of its users get news there.
  • 7. 6 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org Overall, Facebook outstrips all other social media sites as a source of news; YouTube now reaches second highest percentage Looking at the population as a whole, Facebook by far still leads every other social media site as a source of news. This is largely due to Facebook’s large user base, compared with other platforms, and the fact that most of its users get news on the site. Specifically, about two-thirds of Americans (66%) use Facebook, and a majority of those users get news on the site, similar to 2016. Looked at as a portion of all U.S. adults, this translates into just under half (45%) of Americans getting news on Facebook. Even though YouTube has a large user base – 58% of the population – a smaller portion gets news there. In 2017, both the user base and the share getting news on YouTube grew. The result: 18% of all Americans now get news on YouTube, making it the second most common social media site for news – albeit still far behind Facebook. Twitter has the reverse structure from YouTube: While a large share of its users get news on the site (74% say they do), its audience is significantly smaller overall. This means that overall, fewer Americans get news on Twitter (11% of U.S. adults). Social media sites as pathways to news % of U.S. adults who use each social media site and % of U.S. adults who get news from each site Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017. “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017” PEW RESEARCH CENTER
  • 8. 7 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org 15% 18 26 2013 2016 2017 Not only have Americans grown somewhat in their use of social media for news overall, but now they are more likely than ever to get news from multiple social media sites. About one quarter of all U.S. adults (26%) get news from two or more of these sites, up from 18% in 2016 and 15% in 2013. News users of Instagram, Snapchat and WhatsApp are particularly likely to get news on multiple social networks; at least 90% of their news users get news on at least two social media sites. There are also some interesting differences in where the overlaps occur – in other words, which sites tend to share users. Instagram’s news users, for example, are much more likely to also get news on Snapchat (40% do so) than are LinkedIn’s news users (8% of LinkedIn news users also get news on Snapchat), for example. But Facebook, with such a large news user base, overlaps with just about every other social media site: About half or more of news users (at least 48%) of each of the other sites studied also get news on Facebook. About one-in-four now get news from multiple social media sites % of U.S. adults who get news on two or more different social media sites Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017. “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017” PEW RESEARCH CENTER
  • 9. 8 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org There are some key differences in the demographic makeup of each site’s news users. Instagram and Snapchat news consumers are considerably more likely to be nonwhite and younger. Twitter and LinkedIn have the largest share of college graduates among their news users – 59% of LinkedIn’s news users have college degrees, as do 45% of Twitter’s news users. The news user bases of the two largest sites – Facebook and YouTube – include more older Americans than those of smaller sites such as Instagram and Snapchat. Snapchat has by far the youngest group of news users – 82% are ages 18-29. While Facebook and YouTube are still the most popular among this age group for news overall, the makeup of the app’s news audience means that about one-in-five (21%) 18- to 29-year-olds now get news on Snapchat. Social media news user profiles % of each social media site’s news users who are … Note: Tumblr, Reddit, and WhatsApp not shown. Nonwhite includes all racial and ethnic groups, except non-Hispanic white. Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017. “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017” PEW RESEARCH CENTER
  • 10. 9 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org 33% 25 21 30 22 30 37 Facebook YouTube Twitter Instagram Snapchat LinkedIn All adults Local TV 24% 24 28 27 20 29 28 Facebook YouTube Twitter Instagram Snapchat LinkedIn All adults Cable TV 20% 18 15 22 12 22 26 Facebook YouTube Twitter Instagram Snapchat LinkedIn All adults Network nightly TV 33% 44 55 48 49 58 33 Facebook YouTube Twitter Instagram Snapchat LinkedIn All adults News websites/apps 24% 26 29 26 15 34 25 Facebook YouTube Twitter Instagram Snapchat LinkedIn All adults Radio 11% 9 11 11 5 16 18 Facebook YouTube Twitter Instagram Snapchat LinkedIn All adults Print newspapers Getting news on social media doesn’t mean that other more traditional pathways to news are ignored. Many social media news users also get news from a variety of other platforms, although there are some differences among the users of the various sites. Twitter news users, for example, are more likely to also often get news via news websites and apps than Facebook or YouTube news users. Facebook news users are more likely to often get news from local TV than those on YouTube, Twitter and Snapchat. Use of traditional news platforms by social media news users % of each social media site’s news users who often get news from … Note: Reddit, Tumblr, and WhatsApp not shown. Source: Survey conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017 among U.S. adults. “News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2017” PEW RESEARCH CENTER
  • 11. 10 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org Acknowledgments This report was made possible by The Pew Charitable Trusts. Pew Research Center is a subsidiary of the Pew Charitable Trusts, its primary funder. This report is a collaborative effort based on the input and analysis of the following individuals. Find related reports online at: journalism.org. Amy Mitchell, Director, Journalism Research Elisa Shearer, Research Analyst Jeffrey Gottfried, Senior Researcher Sophia Fedeli, Research Assistant Galen Stocking, Research Associate Katerina Eva Matsa, Senior Researcher Margaret Porteus, Information Graphics Designer Rachel Weisel, Communications Manager Hannah Klein, Communications Associate Shannon Greenwood, Associate Digital Producer
  • 12. 11 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org Methodology The American Trends Panel (ATP), created by Pew Research Center, is a nationally representative panel of randomly selected U.S. adults recruited from landline and cellphone random-digit-dial (RDD) surveys. Panelists participate via monthly self-administered web surveys. Panelists who do not have internet access are provided with a tablet and wireless internet connection. The panel is being managed by Abt Associates. Data in this report are drawn from the panel wave conducted Aug. 8-21, 2017, among 4,971 respondents. The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 4,971 respondents is plus or minus 2.5 percentage points. Members of the American Trends Panel were recruited from several large, national landline and cellphone random-digit-dial surveys conducted in English and Spanish. At the end of each survey, respondents were invited to join the panel. The first group of panelists was recruited from the 2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey, conducted from Jan. 23 to March 16, 2014. Of the 10,013 adults interviewed, 9,809 were invited to take part in the panel, and a total of 5,338 agreed to participate.2 The second group of panelists was recruited from the 2015 Pew Research Center Survey on Government, conducted from Aug. 27 to Oct. 4, 2015. Of the 6,004 adults interviewed, all were invited to join the panel, and 2,976 agreed to participate.3 The third group of panelists was recruited from a survey conducted from April 25 to June 4, 2017. Of the 5,012 adults interviewed in the survey or pretest, 3,905 were invited to take part in the panel and a total of 1,628 agreed to participate.4 The ATP data were weighted in a multi-step process that begins with a base weight incorporating the respondents’ original survey selection probability and the fact that in 2014 some panelists were subsampled for invitation to the panel. Next, an adjustment was made for the fact that the propensity to join the panel and remain an active panelist varied across different groups in the sample. The final step in the weighting uses an iterative technique that aligns the sample to population benchmarks on a number of dimensions. Gender, age, education, race, Hispanic origin and region parameters come from the U.S. Census Bureau's 2015 American Community Survey. The county-level population density parameter (deciles) comes from the 2010 U.S. Decennial 2 When data collection for the 2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey began, non-internet users were subsampled at a rate of 25%, but a decision was made shortly thereafter to invite all non-internet users to join. In total, 83% of non-internet users were invited to join the panel. 3 Respondents to the 2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey who indicated that they are internet users but refused to provide an email address were initially permitted to participate in the American Trends Panel by mail but were no longer permitted to join the panel after Feb. 6, 2014. Internet users from the 2015 Pew Research Center Survey on Government who refused to provide an email address were not permitted to join the panel. 4 White, non-Hispanic college graduates were subsampled at a rate of 50%.
  • 13. 12 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org Census. The telephone service benchmark comes from the January-June 2016 National Health Interview Survey and is projected to 2017. The volunteerism benchmark comes from the 2015 Current Population Survey Volunteer Supplement. The party affiliation benchmark is the average of the three most recent Pew Research Center general public telephone surveys. The Internet access benchmark comes from the 2017 ATP Panel Refresh Survey. Respondents who did not previously have internet access are treated as not having internet access for weighting purposes. Respondents were also weighted according to their previously reported usage of eight different social networks for news consumption. The variables used for this weighting were measured on the January-February 2016 wave of the ATP and were weighted to match a Pew Research Center journalism survey from March-April 2016. For panelists who did not participate in the 2016 survey, these variables were imputed using chained equations. Sampling errors and statistical tests of significance take into account the effect of weighting. Interviews are conducted in both English and Spanish, but the Hispanic sample in the American Trends Panel is predominantly native born and English speaking. The following table shows the unweighted sample sizes and the error attributable to sampling that would be expected at the 95% level of confidence for different groups in the survey: Group Unweighted sample size Plus or minus … Total sample 4,971 2.5 Sample sizes and sampling errors for other subgroups are available upon request. In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls. The August 2017 wave had a response rate of 74% (4,971 responses among 6,722 individuals in the panel). Taking account of the combined, weighted response rate for the recruitment surveys (10.0%) and attrition from panel members who were removed at their request or for inactivity, the cumulative response rate for the wave is 2.6 %.5 © Pew Research Center, 2017 5 Approximately once per year, panelists who have not participated in multiple consecutive waves are removed from the panel. These cases are counted in the denominator of cumulative response rates.
  • 14. 13 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org Topline questionnaire 2017 PEW RESEARCH CENTER’S AMERICAN TRENDS PANEL WAVE 28 August FINAL TOPLINE Aug. 8-Aug. 21, 2017 TOTAL N=4,971 Now, thinking about your general news habits … ASK ALL: NEWS_PLATFORM How often do you … [RANDOMIZE] Often Sometimes Hardly ever Never No Answer a. Read any newspapers in print? Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 18 25 32 25 * Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 20 28 31 21 * Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 27 27 27 19 * b. Listen to news on the radio? Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 25 31 22 21 * Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 25 34 24 17 * Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 26 30 27 18 * NO ITEM C d. Watch local television news? Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 37 27 21 15 * Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 466 27 17 10 * Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 46 26 17 11 * e. Watch national evening network television news (such as ABC World News, CBS Evening News, or NBC Nightly News)? Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 26 25 25 25 * Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 30 27 25 17 * Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 31 28 24 18 * f. Watch cable television news (such as CNN, The Fox News cable channel, or MSNBC)? Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 28 27 23 22 * Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 31 27 24 18 * Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 24 28 26 21 * 6 In the Spanish language version of the questionnaire, “local television news” was mistranslated as “television news” for NEWS_PLATFORM item D. This affected the 66 respondents who took the survey in Spanish (4% of the sample after weighting). The effects of this mistranslation were minimal and do not affect the report’s substantive conclusions.
  • 15. 14 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org Often Sometimes Hardly ever Never No Answer NEWS_PLATFORM CONTINUED … g. Get news from a social media site (such as Facebook, Twitter, or Snapchat?)? Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 20 27 20 33 0 Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 18 26 18 38 * h. Get news from a news website or app? Aug 7-Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 33 31 19 17 * Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 28 28 18 26 * ASK ALL INTERNET USERS (F_INTUSER_FINAL=1) [N=4,752]: SNS Do you use any of the following social media sites? [Check all that apply] [RANDOMIZE WITH “OTHER” ALWAYS LAST] BASED ON TOTAL Selected Not Selected No Answer a. Facebook Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 66 34 - Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 67 33 - Mar 13-15, 20-22, 2015 [N=2,035] 66 34 1 Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 64 36 * b. Twitter Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 15 85 - Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 16 84 - Mar 13-15, 20-22, 2015 [N=2,035] 17 83 1 Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 16 84 * NO ITEM C d. LinkedIn Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 21 79 - Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 20 80 - Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 19 80 * e. Instagram Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 26 74 - Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 19 81 - Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 12 88 * NO ITEM F g. Tumblr Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 4 96 - Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 4 96 - Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 4 96 *
  • 16. 15 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org Selected Not Selected No Answer SNS CONTINUED … h. YouTube Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 58 42 - Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 48 52 - Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 51 49 * i. Reddit Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 6 94 - Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 4 96 - Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 3 97 * j. Snapchat Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 18 82 - Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 10 90 - k. WhatsApp Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 11 89 - l. Other Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=4,971] 5 95 - Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=4,654] 11 89 - Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=5,173] 3 97 * ASK IF AT LEAST YES TO 1 ITEM SNS; SHOW ONLY THOSE SITES USED (SNSA-K=1): SNSNEWS Do you ever get news or news headlines on any of the following sites? By news we mean information about events and issues that involve more than just your friends or family. [RANDOMIZE] Yes No No Answer BASED ON FACEBOOK USERS: a. Facebook Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=3,635] 68 32 1 Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=3,210] 66 34 * Mar 13-15, 20-22, 2015 [N=1,343] 63 37 * Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=3,268] 47 53 0 BASED ON TWITTER USERS: b. Twitter Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=1,088] 74 25 1 Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=908] 59 41 1 Mar 13-15, 20-22, 2015 [N=347] 63 37 0 Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=736] 52 48 0 NO ITEM C BASED ON LINKEDIN USERS: d. LinkedIn Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=1,540] 23 76 1 Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=1,348] 19 81 * Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=1,107] 13 87 0
  • 17. 16 PEW RESEARCH CENTER www.pewresearch.org Yes No No Answer SNSNEWS CONTINUED … BASED ON INSTAGRAM USERS: e. Instagram Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=1,390] 27 71 2 Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=933] 23 76 1 Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=467] 13 87 0 NO ITEM F BASED ON TUMBLR USERS: g. Tumblr Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=226] 39 60 1 Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=198] 31 69 - Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=159] 29 71 0 BASED ON YOUTUBE USERS: h. YouTube Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=3,180] 32 67 1 Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=2,542] 21 77 1 Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=2,506] 20 80 0 BASED ON REDDIT USERS: i. Reddit Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=369] 68 32 * Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=288] 70 30 * Aug 21-Sep 2, 2013 [N=114] 62 38 0 BASED ON SNAPCHAT USERS: j. Snapchat Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=787] 29 70 2 Jan 12-Feb 8, 2016 [N=439] 17 82 1 BASED ON WHATSAPP USERS: k. WhatsApp Aug 7- Aug 21, 2017 [N=585] 23 74 3