The document summarizes the opening remarks at a seminar on Agenda 2063 held in Pretoria, South Africa. Representatives from JICA, the Japanese embassy, NEPAD, and the South African government welcomed participants and emphasized the importance of Agenda 2063, Africa's strategic framework for socioeconomic development. They discussed Japan's support for African development through initiatives like TICAD and how partnerships like TICAD will be crucial to implementing Agenda 2063's goals of inclusive and sustainable development across the continent by 2063.
African union transition and its ability to respond to conflicts in africaSARON MESSEMBE OBIA
From the Organization of African Unity (OAU) to African Union (AU) The African Union initiated by Pan Africanists to improve the lives of Africans through sustainable development and to resolve conflicts in the continent. But the competence of the African Union has been put to question. The inability of the AU to resolve the conflict in central African Republic, the continuous terrorist attacks in Nigeria by Boko-Haram, in Kenya and Somalia by Al-Shabba, has led the international community to focus on insecurity in the African continent. Though this change from OAU to AU the AU still faces some challenges. Nonetheless it has registered some success.
BIMSTEC AND MYANMAR
The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC)
https://burmese.voanews.com/a/bimstec-myanmar-joint-military-exercise/4573245.html?ltflags=mailer
ျမန္မာအပါအ၀င္ BIMSTEC ႏိုင္ငံမ်ား ပူးတြဲ စစ္ေလ့က်င့္
The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) is a regional organization comprising seven Member States lying in the littoral and adjacent areas of the Bay of Bengal constituting a contiguous regional unity. This sub-regional organization came into being on 6 June 1997 through the Bangkok Declaration. It constitutes seven Member States: five deriving from South Asia, including Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and two from Southeast Asia, including Myanmar and Thailand. Initially, the economic bloc was formed with four Member States with the acronym ‘BIST-EC’ (Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka and Thailand Economic Cooperation). Following the inclusion of Myanmar on 22 December 1997 during a special Ministerial Meeting in Bangkok, the Group was renamed ‘BIMST-EC’ (Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Thailand Economic Cooperation). With the admission of Nepal and Bhutan at the 6th Ministerial Meeting (February 2004, Thailand), the name of the grouping was changed to ‘Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation’ (BIMSTEC).
info@bimstec.org
https://bimstec.org
About
Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation. (BIMSTEC)
Impressum
Intergovernmental Regional Organization
In 2014, the OECD Southeast Asia Regional Programme was launched, building on two decades of co-operation and dialogue between OECD and SEA countries. This ‘Active with Southeast Asia’ brochure provides a glimpse of the scope and depth of the OECD work with the region.
African union transition and its ability to respond to conflicts in africaSARON MESSEMBE OBIA
From the Organization of African Unity (OAU) to African Union (AU) The African Union initiated by Pan Africanists to improve the lives of Africans through sustainable development and to resolve conflicts in the continent. But the competence of the African Union has been put to question. The inability of the AU to resolve the conflict in central African Republic, the continuous terrorist attacks in Nigeria by Boko-Haram, in Kenya and Somalia by Al-Shabba, has led the international community to focus on insecurity in the African continent. Though this change from OAU to AU the AU still faces some challenges. Nonetheless it has registered some success.
BIMSTEC AND MYANMAR
The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC)
https://burmese.voanews.com/a/bimstec-myanmar-joint-military-exercise/4573245.html?ltflags=mailer
ျမန္မာအပါအ၀င္ BIMSTEC ႏိုင္ငံမ်ား ပူးတြဲ စစ္ေလ့က်င့္
The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) is a regional organization comprising seven Member States lying in the littoral and adjacent areas of the Bay of Bengal constituting a contiguous regional unity. This sub-regional organization came into being on 6 June 1997 through the Bangkok Declaration. It constitutes seven Member States: five deriving from South Asia, including Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and two from Southeast Asia, including Myanmar and Thailand. Initially, the economic bloc was formed with four Member States with the acronym ‘BIST-EC’ (Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka and Thailand Economic Cooperation). Following the inclusion of Myanmar on 22 December 1997 during a special Ministerial Meeting in Bangkok, the Group was renamed ‘BIMST-EC’ (Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka and Thailand Economic Cooperation). With the admission of Nepal and Bhutan at the 6th Ministerial Meeting (February 2004, Thailand), the name of the grouping was changed to ‘Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation’ (BIMSTEC).
info@bimstec.org
https://bimstec.org
About
Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation. (BIMSTEC)
Impressum
Intergovernmental Regional Organization
In 2014, the OECD Southeast Asia Regional Programme was launched, building on two decades of co-operation and dialogue between OECD and SEA countries. This ‘Active with Southeast Asia’ brochure provides a glimpse of the scope and depth of the OECD work with the region.
A lack of access to natural resources, including minerals, water and land, is often the underlying cause of many conflicts around the world. When managed properly however, as part of a peacebuilding strategy, these same resources can also be utilized, and their benefits shared to generate sustainable livelihoods that help guarantee peace and achieve sustainable human development.
Women have the potential to play a critical role in this process, as they use and manage land and other natural resources, while meeting water, food and energy needs in households and communities.
However, this use rarely translates into women being allowed to influence the distribution of natural resources or being given a decision making role when the management of resources is discussed and peace is negotiated.
This report analyzes the reasons behind this discrepancy, its implications for long-term peace and development and suggests some solutions.
Part one of the report examines the relationship between women and natural resources in peacebuilding contexts, reviewing key issues across three main categories of resources, including land, renewable and extractive resources.
Part two of the report discusses entry points for peacebuilding practitioners to address risks and opportunities related to women and natural resource management, focusing on political participation, protection and economic empowerment.
The report was published jointly by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)[DK1] , the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the United Nations Entity for Gender Equity and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women), and the United Nations Peacebuilding Support Office (PBSO). It is the product of a two-year collaboration among the four partners.
Key findings
Women’s role as managers, users and beneficiaries of natural resources is an often unexplored opportunity for increasing their contribution to peacebuilding
Shifting gender norms in conflict-affected settings can be utilized to increase women’s participation in decision-making, and to enable them to engage in economic recovery more productively
Ignoring the role of women in resource management can perpetuate inequalities and grievances linked to natural resource rights, access and control, which have proven to be powerful catalysts for violence
Addressing issues of inequality related to resource access and ownership, participation in decision-making and benefit-sharing early on in the peacebuilding process is therefore a critical condition for lasting peace and development
The year 2013 marks the Golden Jubilee of the founding of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) in 1963; and Africans are commemorating fifty years of achievement of both the OAU and AU. The Sirte Declaration adopted in 1999 to establish the Africa Union, was based primarily on the realization that the original mandate of the OAU, to rid the continent of colonization was to a great extent fulfilled and that Africa needed new institutional arrangements to push forward its developmental and integration agenda.
In the 50th Anniversary Solemn Declaration of the Heads of State and Government of the African Union assembled to celebrate the Golden Jubilee of the OAU/AU, Africa’s political leadership while acknowledging past successes and challenges, rededicated itself to the continent’s development and pledged their commitment to make progress in eight key areas:
1. African Identity and Renaissance,
2. The struggle against colonialism and the right to self-determination of people still under colonial rule,
3. Integration Agenda,
4. Agenda for Social and Economic Development,
5. Agenda for Peace and Security,
6. Democratic Governance,
7. Determining Africa’s Destiny, and
8. Africa’s place in the world They further pledged to integrate these ideals and goals in the national development plans and the development of the Continental Agenda 2063, through a people-driven process for the realization of the vision of the AU for an integrated, people-centred, prosperous Africa, at peace with itself.
The African Union Commission, working closely with the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) Coordinating Agency (NPCA) and supported by the African Development Bank (AfDB), the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), is in the process of putting in place a continental agenda for the next 50 years as requested by the 21st Ordinary session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the African Union, at Addis Ababa, 26 May 2013.
The objective of the Agenda is to develop Africa’s growth trajectory for the next 50 years benefitting from lessons learnt over the last 50 years. The agenda will be developed within the context of the Union’s 50th Anniversary celebrations and will be people-centered while embracing and continuing with the ideals of Pan Africanism. In accordance with Executive Council Decision EX.CL/799 (XXII), the Agenda 2063 Framework Document is to be presented for consideration by AU policy organs in the January 2014 and the final Agenda 2063 for adoption in June 2014.
Furthermore, it is envisaged that relevant issues pertaining to the implementation of the Framework for Agenda 2063 will be discussed during the 1 21st Ordinary session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the African Union, at Addis Ababa, on 26 May 2013
This edition of Africa Capacity from the African Capacity Building Foundation ( www.acbf-pact.org ) discusses:
Egypt and the Gulf: New inroads sought for Africa’s capacity and development;
ACBF-Afreximbank partnership to support Africa;
Off the press: ACBF’s Reports on STI, Agenda 2063;
Trilogy on Africa’s Capacity Imperatives for achieving Agenda 2063;
Tribute to Prof. Callisto Enias Madavo
Enjoy reading
Africa's Engagement of China and Other Partners to Achieve SDGs and Agenda 2063
Multi-Stakeholder Dialogue Forum Organized by – Oxfam International, Africa-China Dialogue Platform
Suggested Date: Wednesday, 28 September 2016, Sheraton Hotel, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Many ways to support street children.pptxSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
A process server is a authorized person for delivering legal documents, such as summons, complaints, subpoenas, and other court papers, to peoples involved in legal proceedings.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
2024: The FAR - Federal Acquisition Regulations, Part 37
Nepad ISS JICA joint seminar towards agenda 2063 the africa we want
1. 1
NEPAD-‐ISS-‐JICA
Joint
Seminar
“Toward
Agenda
2063
–
The
Africa
we
want-‐“
February
10th
,
2015,
Sheraton
Pretoria
Hotel
Opening
Remarks:
In
his
capacity
as
program
director
for
the
event,
Mr.
Yasushi
Naito,
Executive
Advisor
to
Director
General,
Africa
Department
at
the
Japan
International
Cooperation
Agency
(JICA),
welcomed
the
participants
to
the
seminar
and
thanked
the
co-‐organizers,
the
NEPAD
Planning
and
Cooperation
Agency
and
the
Pretoria
office
of
the
Institute
for
Security
Studies
(ISS)
for
their
support.
He
explained
the
role
of
JICA
as
an
international
development
agency
and
emphasized
the
importance
of
Agenda
2063.
He
noted
that
that
Agenda
2063
will
feature
prominently
at
the
AU
summit
scheduled
for
Johannesburg
in
June/July
2015.
To
that
end
the
seminar
was
a
valuable
opportunity
to
obtain
feedback
from
the
most
recent
summit
in
Addis
Ababa
and
to
reflect
on
progress.
Speaking
of
behalf
of
the
ambassador
of
Japan
to
South
Africa,
Mr.
Shinichi
Asazuma,
Minister,
in
the
Embassy,
explained
that
Japan
shares
with
Africa
the
aspirations
of
Agenda
2063,
such
as
inclusive
growth
and
sustainable
development,
good
governance,
democracy,
respect
for
human
rights,
justice
and
the
rule
of
law,
and
unleashing
the
potential
of
women
and
youth.
He
noted
that
Agenda
2063
provides
an
opportunity
to
understand
the
challenges
and
opportunities
of
the
future.
Japan
has
been
building
a
strong,
long
term
commitment
to
African
development
through
the
process
of
TICAD
(Tokyo
International
Conference
on
African
Development),
co-‐organized
with
the
World
Bank,
UN,
UNDP,
and
the
African
Union
Commission.
As
a
result
of
TICAD,
in
Yokohama
in
2013,
the
government
of
Japan
announced
a
commitment
of
approximately
32
billion
USD
in
five
years
from
then,
with
an
emphasis
on
infrastructure
and
human
resource
development,
based
on
African
ownership
and
international
partnership.
Mr
Asazuma
explained
that
Japan’s
commitment
to
TICAD
V
is
clearly
in
line
with
the
concept
of
Agenda
2063.
He
explained
that
empowerment
of
women
is
also
an
important
political
agenda
in
Japan
as
set
out
by
Japanese
Prime
Minister
Shinzo
Abe.
Next
year,
the
first
TICAD
leaders’
conference,
TICAD
VI,
will
be
held
in
Africa
and
that
Agenda
2063
will
surely
be
a
part
of
the
agenda.
Mr.
Dave
Malcolmson
–
Chief
Director,
NEPAD
&
Partnership
from
the
South
African
Department
of
International
Relations
and
Cooperation
then
briefly
explained
the
history
of
the
AU
and
origins
of
NEPAD.
NEPAD
was
adopted
as
the
socio-‐economic
development
programme
of
the
AU.
The
main
purpose
of
NEPAD
is
to
serve
as
an
integrated
programme
driver
for
the
AU
and
its
organs
in
key
areas
such
as
infrastructure
development,
agriculture
and
good
security,
science
and
technology,
and
human
resource
development.
The
key
strategic
framework
of
NEPAD
is
a
shift
from
poverty-‐reduction
to
growth-‐expansion.
Mr.
Malcolmson
highlighted
the
7
aspirations
upon
which
Agenda
2063
is
based.
Mr.
Malcolmson
explained
that
the
AU
Assembly
met
in
Addis
Ababa
on
31
January
2015
and
adopted
the
Agenda
2063
Framework
Document
and
the
Popular
Version
of
Agenda
2063.
The
AU
Commission
was
requested
to
conclude
all
consultations
and
to
finalize
the
First
Ten-‐Year
Plan
by
the
June
2015
Summit
in
South
Africa.
The
Commission
was
also
requested
to
present
detailed
roadmaps
for
the
2. 2
implementation
of
the
Agenda
2063
projects.
Mr.
Malcolmson
went
on
to
explain
that
Africa
must
use
partnerships
to
scale
up
and
accelerate
its
own
efforts,
not
replace
them.
He
emphasized
that
Agenda
2063
will
not
replace
NEPAD,
but
rather
NEPAD
will
continue
to
serve
as
an
instrument
to
implement
the
objectives
contained
in
the
overarching
framework
that
is
Agenda
2063.
The
main
priorities
for
support
include
regional
integration,
infrastructure
development,
industrialization
and
beneficiation,
and
agriculture,
including
agro-‐processing.
Foremost
among
these
partnerships
is
the
TICAD
partnership.
The
key
areas
addressed
in
this
partnership
are
promoting
the
private
sector,
using
trade
and
investment
as
engines
of
development,
strengthening
sectoral
bases
for
growth,
driving
African
development
through
gender
equality
and
women’s
empowerment,
and
enhancing
peace-‐building
capacity.
Mr.
Malcolmson
concluded
that
that
the
next
TICAD
summit
will
have
to
support
both
Agenda
2063
and
the
post-‐2015
Development
Agenda.
The
final
speaker
during
the
opening
session
was
Dr.
Ibrahim
Mayaki,
the
Chief
Executive
Officer
of
the
NEPAD
Agency.
His
speech
was
read
by
Mr.
Symerre
Grey-‐Johnson,
Head,
Partnerships
and
Resource
Mobilisation
at
the
NEPAD
Agency.
Dr.
Mayaki
explained
that
despite
the
gradual
push
towards
a
one-‐
Africa
and
after
40
years
of
the
formation
of
African
Unity,
most
African
countries
rarely
sustain
a
credible
national
development
strategy
without
major
inputs
from
the
Bretton
Woods
institutions.
African
integration
is
a
possible
solution
to
this
external
dependence.
NEPAD
is
the
socio-‐economic
programme
to
accelerate
economic
cooperation
and
integration
among
African
countries
and
a
program
of
action
and
the
implementing
arm
of
Agenda
2063.
It
builds
on
previous
initiatives
to
ensure
an
integrated,
prosperous
and
peaceful
Africa,
driven
by
its
own
citizens
and
representing
a
dynamic
force
in
the
global
arena.
He
went
on
to
say
that
Africa
is
aware
of
the
multi-‐faceted
and
multi-‐dimensional
problems
ahead.
The
21st
century
saw
real
change
on
the
continent
but
guided
by
the
aspirations
of
Agenda
2063,
“Africa
will
engage
global
economy
as
an
equal
partner,
with
clearly
defined
terms
of
engagement
through
its
continental
programmes
that
will
contribute
to
the
rapid
and
sustainable
transformation
agenda
of
the
African
continent.”
He
emphasized
that
Africa’s
reflection
on
its
own
future
will
be
on
how
to
foster
inclusive
prosperity,
reduce
potential
for
violent
confrontations
and
create
conditions
for
peaceful
co-‐existence.
According
to
him,
infrastructure
development
underpinned
by
intraregional
and
global
trade
is
the
continents
best
strategy
to
trigger
industrialization,
the
major
conduit
to
a
prosperous
and
economically
integrated
Africa.
Presentations
Dr.
Kassim
Mohammed
Khamis,
Expert
from
the
Agenda
2063
technical
team
at
the
Department
of
Strategic
Planning,
in
the
African
Union
Commission
then
provided
feedback
from
the
recent
24th
Summit
of
the
African
Union
(AU)
in
Addis
Ababa.
Dr.
Khamis
reported
that
the
Agenda
2063
Technical
document
and
a
Popular
Version
of
Agenda
2063
had
both
been
adopted
at
the
Summit.
According
to
Dr.
Khamis,
the
Agenda
2063
technical
document
is
based
on
three
dimensions.
The
first
is
a
vision
for
2063
–
a
vivid
picture
of
where
Africans
would
like
to
see
their
continent
50
years
from
now.
The
second
is
the
transformation
framework
–
the
foundations
on
which
Agenda
2063
is
being
built
as
well
as
detailed
milestones.
The
final
dimension
is
implementation
–
how
to
get
to
Agenda
2063
–
and
includes
various
aspects
relating
to
monitoring
and
evaluation,
financing,
partnerships,
communication
and
outreach.
Dr.
Khamis
then
provided
a
brief
overview
of
the
Popular
Version,
which
is
to
present
the
3. 3
technical
document
in
simple
and
understandable
format
to
all
Africans
in
the
AU’s
four
languages
and
thereby
to
popularize
Agenda
2063.
After
a
process
of
consultation
with
a
broad
range
of
African
experts,
the
First
10-‐Year
Implementation
Plan
and
Monitoring
and
Evaluation
framework
will
expectedly
be
adopted
during
the
next
AU
Summit
in
Johannesburg
in
June
2015.
The
plan
sets
specific
targets
and
provide
indicative
strategies
at
the
continental,
national
and
regional
level.
It
outlines
the
institutional
arrangements
as
to
how
to
implement,
monitor,
and
evaluate
the
plan
at
the
continental
and
national
level,
indicates
the
potential
sources
of
funding,
capacity
requirements,
and
strategies
for
communication.
Dr.
Khamis
concluded
his
presentation
by
noting
that
the
Addis
Ababa
Summit
requested
the
Commission
to
undertake
additional
consultations
and
also
decided
to
re-‐structure
the
Commission
to
accommodate
Agenda
2063,
to
integrate
the
Blue
Economy
within
the
Agenda
2063
Framework
and
decided
that
the
Executive
Council
of
Ministers
of
Foreign
Affairs
would
deliberate
on
the
Ten
Year
Implementation
Plan
at
a
preparatory
retreat
ahead
of
the
Summit
in
Johannesburg.
In
a
second
substantive
presentation,
Dr.
Theodore
Ahlers,
Senior
Associate
at
the
Centennial
Group
presented
on
the
agenda
for
action
required
to
realize
the
goals
of
Agenda
2063.
He
did
so
based
on
a
2014
book
co-‐sponsored
by
JICA.
Africa
2050:
realizing
the
continent’s
full
potential1
,
was
published
by
Oxford
University
and
consists
of
a
comprehensive
analysis
and
various
scenarios
for
Africa’s
future.
Dr.
Ahlers
noted
that
the
book
is
driven
by
the
aspirations
of
Africans,
and
emphasized
the
importance
of
capable,
inclusive,
and
accountable
states
and
institutions.
He
noted
that
Africa
has
grown
rapidly
since
the
1990s,
but
that
Africans
aspirations
have
risen
even
faster.
The
challenge
for
Africa’s
leaders
is
to
sustain
the
progress
of
the
last
15
years
and
to
deliver
on
these
aspirations.
The
high-‐road
scenario
that
corresponds
with
Agenda
2063
envisioned
a
six-‐fold
increase
in
per
capita
income
by
2050,
a
ten-‐fold
reduction
in
the
number
of
poor
people
with
two
thirds
of
Africans
part
of
the
middle
class
and
a
share
of
global
GDP
tripling
to
9%.
Dr.
Ahlers
noted
that
turning
vision
into
reality
required
an
integrated
Africa,
competitive
economies,
prosperous
people
and
cohesive
societies.
After
listing
five
global
drivers,
largely
outside
of
Africa’s
control,
the
speaker
turned
to
five
Africa
specific
drivers
to
change
namely:
• Demographics
–
is
it
a
dividend
or
a
social
time
bomb?
• Oil
and
minerals
–
is
it
a
blessing
or
a
curse?
• Fragility
–
do
we
speak
about
growing
security
or
the
contagious
effect
of
conflict?
• Disparities
–
the
difference
between
inclusive
growth
and
explosive
inequality?
• Middle
income
–
a
road
to
prosperity
or
a
trap?
The
framework
for
Africa
2050
is
composed
of
three
dimensions:
prosperous
people,
competitive
economies,
and
an
integrated
continent.
He
concluded
that
all
of
these
dimensions
require
capable
states
and
pragmatic
leadership
focused
on
results.
1
Se
http://jica-‐ri.jica.go.jp/publication/assets/Africa%202050%20Overview%20final%2029%20May.pdf
4. 4
In
a
third
substantive
presentation,
Dr.
Jakkie
Cilliers,
Executive
Director
of
the
Institute
for
Security
Studies
(ISS),
presented
the
results
from
a
recent
publication
“Reasonable
goals
for
reducing
poverty
in
Africa,”
that
was
published
in
February
2015
by
the
African
Futures
Project
at
the
ISS
in
partnership
with
the
Pardee
Center
for
International
Futures
at
the
University
of
Denver.
Dr.
Cilliers
noted
that
the
paper
was
an
updated
and
revised
version
of
an
August
2014
publication
that
now
includes
the
recently
released,
newly
recalculated
2011
GDP
per
capita
income
levels.
Using
this
data
the
authors
were
able
to
propose
an
updated
measure
of
extreme
poverty
($1.75
in
2011
PPP
as
opposed
to
$1.25
in
2005
PPP)
in
anticipation
of
a
new
poverty
line
required
for
inclusion
in
the
post-‐2015
MDG’s.
Using
the
International
Futures
(IFs)
forecasting
system
to
analyze
the
feasibility
of
eradicating
poverty
in
Africa
the
authors
found
that
many
African
states
are
unlikely
to
meet
the
original
target
or
eradicating
extreme
poverty
in
Africa
by
2030.
The
paper
subsequently
modeled
four
discrete
sets
of
pro-‐poor
policy
measures
carefully
targeted
to
relieve
chronic
and
deep-‐seated
poverty.
Lifting
people
out
of
chronic
poverty
requires
social
assistance,
pro-‐poor
economic
growth,
human
development
for
the
hard
to
reach,
and
progressive
social
change.
Based
on
their
work
the
authors
argue
for
country
specific
targets,
reducing
extreme
poverty
to
below
15%
by
2030
using
2011
purchasing
power
parity,
and
to
below
4%
by
2045.
Dr.
Cilliers
stressed
the
importance
of
looking
at
chronic
and
severe
poverty,
i.e.
people
living
on
less
than
$1.00
a
day
(in
2011
purchasing
power
parity,
previously
$0.70
in
2005
PPP)
given
the
depth
of
poverty
in
Africa.
Fully
51%
of
extremely
poor
people
in
Africa
live
in
severe
poverty
–
an
indication
that
dealing
with
poverty
in
Africa
is
a
long-‐term
challenge,
requiring
long-‐term
integrated
planning.
Question
and
Answer
Panel:
The
subsequent
question
and
answer
panel
was
moderated
by
Ms.
Elizabeth
Sidiropoulos,
Chief
Executive
of
the
South
African
Institute
for
International
Affairs
(SAIIA).
After
introducing
the
members
of
the
panel
she
invited
each
to
make
introductory
remarks.
Mr.
Talla
Kebe,
Sr.
Policy
Advisor
at
UNECA
and
Acting
Head
of
Knowledge
Management
and
Strategic
Planning
at
NEPAD
Agency,
is
in
charge
of
collating
the
NEPAD
Agency
Blueprint
for
an
Integrated
Approach
to
Implement
Agenda
2063.
In
his
remarks
Mr.
Kebe
emphasized
the
role
of
the
private
sector
in
Africa’s
development
after
acknowledging
the
important
role
that
governments
play
in
attracting
foreign
direct
investment.
He
called
for
a
human
face
to
Agenda
2063
that
ordinary
Africans
could
identify
with
while
underlining
the
need
to
focus
equally
on
implementation
and
planning.
During
the
panel
discussion
he
underlined
the
need
for
coordination
at
all
three
levels
of
planning:
continental,
national,
and
regional
as
well
as
the
need
to
strengthen
the
capacity
of
national
development
planners
at
the
national
level.
During
his
intervention,
Mr.
Ichiro
Tambo,
Director
General
of
the
JICA
Research
Institute,
underlined
three
aspects
as
particularly
important
for
Agenda
2063:
inclusiveness,
resilience,
and
equity.
Speaking
from
the
Asian
experience,
he
noted
the
need
to
revisit
the
role
of
government
and
development
agencies.
In
the
past,
JICA
was
just
a
resource
provider.
In
his
view
this
should
change
in
the
future.
Japan
has
a
lot
of
experience
with
development
and
he
underlined
the
need
to
rethink
the
role
of
the
5. 5
state
and
of
development
agencies.
He
introduced
Japan’s
experience
in
the
1950’s
in
formulating
an
ambitious
national
development
plan
for
doubling
national
income,
Mr.
Tambo
said
that
doubling
national
income
was
achieved
much
earlier
than
expected,
since
a
consensus
among
Japanese
people
had
been
broadly
built
through
multi-‐stakeholder
consultations
led
by
Japanese
Government.
He
also
expressed
expectation
from
this
past
experience
of
Japan
that
the
Agenda
2063
would
strengthen
bottom-‐up
approach
through
facilitating
multi-‐stakeholder
consultation
with
African
people.
During
the
subsequent
panel
discussion
he
also
focused
his
remarks
on
the
importance
of
investment
in
research
and
development
and
on
science
and
technology.
After
Mr.
Tambo,
Mr.
Joel
Netshitenzhe
from
the
Mapungubwe
Institute
for
Strategic
Reflection
(MISTRA)
spoke
about
the
extent
to
which
all
were
entering
a
new
paradigm
of
discourse
on
Africa.
This
vision
and
practical
action
help
to
influence
self-‐identity,
he
noted.
We
need
to
ask
ourselves,
“How
does
growth
impact
the
human
condition?”
Infrastructure
in
sub-‐Saharan
Africa
must
be
seen
as
an
opportunity
for
industrialization
and
manufacturing.
If
we
are
putting
down
roads
and
railways,
why
should
the
materials
be
imported?
We
need
to
rethink
interactions
between
the
state,
the
private
sector
and
civil
society,
to
forge
a
social
compact
among
these
partners.
We
also
need
to
include
the
‘think
industry’:
academics,
researchers
and
think
tanks.
The
policy
decisions
taken
must
be
informed
by
science
and
intellect.
We
also
need
to
make
sure
that
the
initiatives
are
driven
by
Africans,
not
the
narrow
political
objectives
of
other
powers.
Economic
growth
must
be
premised,
largely,
on
local
manufacturing
and
regional
integration,
and
it
must
benefit
all,
he
intoned.
During
the
subsequent
discussion
Mr.
Netshitenzhe
expressed
his
concern
that
when
leaders
leave
office,
commitment
to
pan-‐
African
programmes
and
Agenda
2063
could
easily
wither
and
die.
In
his
view
this
informed
the
need
to
institutionalize
these
initiatives
in
national
polities
and
to
build
sustainable
capacity.
The
final
discussant
was
Mr.
Kuseni
Dlamini,
the
Chairman
of
Massmart/Walmart
who
reminded
participants
about
the
surplus
of
plans
and
good
intentions
in
Africa.
We
just
need
to
follow
through
and
implement
them,
he
noted.
There
are
strong
correlations
between
the
private
sector
and
the
level
of
democracy,
and
the
private
sector
and
the
level
of
security.
Japan
did
not
develop
in
isolation,
it
was
open
to
the
world.
Global
competitiveness
must
be
embraced.
Other
continents
are
planning
as
well.
Today’s
problems
are
too
big
for
the
state
to
solve
alone.
We
need
to
build
an
Oxford
and
Cambridge
in
Africa.
Concluding
session
After
interaction
with
participants,
Dr.
Tandeka
Nkiwana,
Special
Advisor
to
the
CEO
of
the
NEPAD
Agency
and
the
Managing
Director
of
the
ISS,
Mr.
Anton
du
Plessis
concluded
the
seminar
by
reflecting
on
the
days
proceedings,
thanked
all
the
participants,
the
organizers
and
the
administrative
staff.
The
results
of
the
seminar
will
feed
into
TICAD
(Tokyo
International
Conference
for
African
Development).
The
next
TICAD
summit
(TICAD
VI)
will
be
held
in
Africa
for
the
first
time
in
2016
and
co-‐
organised
with
the
AU
Commission,
the
World
Bank
and
the
United
Nations.
The
meeting
adjourned
at
13:30.